The Railway Magazine

ACCESS ALL AREAS?

ASK someone for their views on open access passenger operations and the response will give you a pretty good idea where they stand on the much larger issues of railway ownership and structure.

For some, open access is the ultimate expression of free enterprise on the railway – a way to improve services, reduce fares and increase choice through competition. But for others, it is a distraction from the real business of running a cohesive railway system, a wasteful use of scarce capacity and a drain on already stressed franchised operators on key routes. And, of course, rail already has strong competition from cars, coaches and airlines.

Such contrasting, strongly held beliefs make it hard to establish a clear, objective view of the benefits – or otherwise – of open access, but with the current Government apparently keen to encourage new passenger operators, it is a good time to look at the successes and failures so far and what the future holds.

We’ll also take a brief look at mainland Europe, where several countries have followed the UK example in opening up their national networks to new operators, with varying degrees of success.

The complexity and cost of bidding for open access paths, not to mention the (understandable) reluctance of operators to accommodate competitors on ‘their’ route, and more practical issues such as capacity, means only a few schemes have actually made it onto the rails.

When the original 25 franchises were created in the mid-1990s, the privatised structure had an in-built contradiction from the outset. Franchise bids were based on the level of subsidy the train companies would receive for running services.

Budding open access operators were effectively squeezed out as no-one wanted to risk the best and most profitable services being 'cherry-picked' and damaged by new competitors. As a result, only a handful of services have ever run outside the franchise system.

New rules

Interestingly, the UK’s first open access passenger operation was not aimed at providing competition to a franchised main line operator – it was Heathrow Express (HEX). Taking advantage of the new rules on open access after Privatisation, HEX started its dedicated service between London Paddington and Heathrow Airport in 1998, operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of British Airports Authority (BAA), now Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd.

The project started as a joint venture between British Rail and BAA, but following Privatisation in 1994, the latter took full control.

In 2018, Heathrow Airport decided to hand over the operation of HEX to Great Western Railway (GWR), which

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from The Railway Magazine

The Railway Magazine13 min read
MIDLAND TRANSITIONS 3 The 125 era
Guinness World Record: Longest-running railway series, established in 1901 IT was to be more than 30 years from the introduction of 125mph-capable trains to the Midland Main Line before matching track was provided. As we have seen in the previous Mid
The Railway Magazine3 min readCrime & Violence
West Coast Suspends ‘Jacobite’ Operation
JUST eight days before the start of the 2024‘Jacobite’season was due to begin, the West Coast Railway Company (WCR) announced it was suspending the start of the seasonal operation over the West Highland extension. The shock announcement came on March
The Railway Magazine3 min read
Railways in Parliament
WOKINGHAM MP John Redwood asked the Department for Transport (DfT) to take steps to allow multiple train operating companies to operate on each rail line and take other steps to help increase competition on regional lines. Transport Minister Hugh Mer

Related