New Philosopher

Changing minds

“Change is the process by which the future invades our lives.” Alvin Toffler

Jonathan Swift was one to choose his words carefully. In a letter from 1725 written to his good friend, the poet and satirist Alexander Pope, he contested the contemporary definition of humanity. “I have got materials toward a treatise, proving the falsity of that definition animal rationale,” he wrote. That common definition of humans being ‘rational animals’ was one that Swift found outrageously vain. Instead his treatise was to “show it should be only rationis capax”. That is, humans are “capable of reason”, although we typically choose not to employ it.

If we’re honest with ourselves, Swift was right. Indeed, one of the richest veins of recent scientific research has shown that the human animal is rarely rational, and rational discourse is

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from New Philosopher

New Philosopher3 min read
Wealth
Letitia Elizabeth Landon 1802-1838 One great evil of highly civilised society is, the immense distance between the rich and the poor; it leads, on either side, to a hardened selfishness. Where we know little, we care little; but the fact once admi
New Philosopher2 min read
FORTUNES WON & LOST
In 2005, this British couple won a $2.76 million lottery jackpot, after which they did what many lottery winners do: they bought a Porsche and went on luxury holidays. Five years later, their underinsured house caught on fire, and media reports sugge
New Philosopher6 min read
Reverse The Flow
In 1600, as Shakespeare worked on his great tragedies, the Mughal Empire, stretching across modern South Asia, was arguably the wealthiest place in the world. It produced about a quarter of the world’s manufactured goods and dominated the global text

Related Books & Audiobooks