No Simple Victory: World War II in Europe, 1939-1945
Written by Norman Davies
Narrated by Simon Vance
4.5/5
()
About this audiobook
In detailing the clash of political philosophies that drove the war's savage engine, Davies also examines how factors as diverse as technology, economics, and morale played dynamic roles in shaping battles, along with the unsung yet vital help of Poland, Greece, and the Ukraine (which suffered the highest number of casualties). And while the Allies resorted to bombing enemy civilians to sow terror, the most damning condemnation is saved for the Soviet Union, whose glossed-over war crimes against British soldiers and its own people prove that Communism and Nazism were two sides of the same brutal coin.
No Simple Victory is an unparalleled work that will fascinate not only history buffs but anyone who is interested in discovering the reality behind what Davies refers to as "the frozen perspective of the winners' history."
Norman Davies
Norman Davies FBA, FRHistS is a British-Polish historian noted for his publications on the history of Europe, Poland and the United Kingdom. He is widely regarded as one of the preeminent historians of Central and Eastern European history. He is the UNESCO Professor at the Jagiellonian University, Professor Emeritus at the University College London, a Visiting Professor at the College of Europe and an Honorary Fellow at St. Antony's College, Oxford.
More audiobooks from Norman Davies
Vanished Kingdoms: The Rise and Fall of States and Nations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Isles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trail of Hope: The Anders Army, An Odyssey Across Three Continents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Europe: A History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to No Simple Victory
Related audiobooks
Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5After Hitler: The Last Ten Days of World War II in Europe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Vanquished: Why the First World War Failed to End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eight Days at Yalta: How Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin Shaped the Post-War World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cold War: A New History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First World War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First World War: A Complete History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Moscow 1941: A City and Its People at War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Deluge: The Great War, America and the Remaking of the Global Order, 1916-1931 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Lighthouse of Stalingrad: The Epic Siege at the Heart of the Greatest Battle of World War II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Devils' Alliance: Hitler's Pact With Stalin, 1939-1941 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Iron Wind: Europe Under Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5April 1945: The Hinge of History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bitter Road to Freedom: A New History of the Liberation of Europe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Checkmate in Berlin: The Cold War Showdown That Shaped the Modern World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/51939: A People's History of the Coming of the Second World War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eight Days in May: The Final Collapse of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stalin, Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Third Reich in History and Memory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great War and Modern Memory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of Tsarist Russia: The March to World War I and Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ivan's War: Life and Death in the Red Army, 1939-1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51946: The Making of the Modern World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Monuments Men: Allied Heroes, Nazi Thieves, and the Greatest Treasure Hunt in History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/51917: Lenin, Wilson, and the Birth of the New World Disorder Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Armor and Blood: The Battle of Kursk: The Turning Point of World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
History For You
The Endurance Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Five Rings Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Demon Copperhead: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All the Sinners Bleed: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Secret History of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Korean War: A History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Overstory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Swingtime for Hitler: Goebbels’s Jazzmen, Tokyo Rose, and Propaganda That Carries a Tune Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mary Magdalene: Women, the Church, and the Great Deception Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell's Princess: The Mystery of Belle Gunness, Butcher of Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Knowing What We Know: The Transmission of Knowledge: From Ancient Wisdom to Modern Magic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Razorblade Tears: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Restaurant: A History of Eating Out Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Small Mercies: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cuba (Winner of the Pulitzer Prize): An American History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dead Are Arising: The Life of Malcolm X Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story of Art Without Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Astor: The Rise and Fall of an American Fortune Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for No Simple Victory
13 ratings6 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A comprehensive account of the war that cannot be called a military history. As much historiography as history, Norman Davies examines the terms used to recount the events to a greater extent than the events themselves. Giving the majority of his time to events on the Eastern Front as the greater of the fronts, he includes details not normally included by a work of such a scope. A must read for any serious student of the Second World War.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Multi-faceted study of the war in Europe with a number of interesting observations. NOT a straight military history. Some facts may be in error but a worthwhile read for those interested in something other than a general history.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Norman Davies posits that the standard Western narrative of "how WWII was _won_" demands a closer look. Many, many mistakes were made in the West's approach, unnecessary and unconscionable death and destruction was visited upon many innocents, and the Wests motives were not as pure as standard history books would have one believe.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5It was a relief to finish this - I might have given it more than 3 stars if it'd been 200 pages shorter. I enjoyed the first 3 chapters, and his perspective about the relative contributions of the parties and their motives made me think. He repeats his main points about the Soviet Union over and over, so I won't forget them any time soon...but I won't be reading any more Norman Davies books for a while. I gave up on his Warsaw Rising book a few years back so should have known this'd be a struggle!
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Davies’ extensive history of WW2 is divided into five subject areas: military, politics, soldiers, civilians, and media. Each area is explored chronologically, so that we go back and forth, five times, sometimes over the same material.Throughout, several themes predominate: 1. Western powers aggrandize their roles in WW2. To the contrary, the most important battles were in the East, and the 1945 victory in Europe was “above all” Stalin’s. These facts are obscured by “relentless Western publicity pursued to the greater glory of Western interests….”2. Most histories of WW2, looking through Western conceptual lenses, see Hitler’s Germany as the “most” evil. America’s “war-time love affair with the USSR” put Soviet atrocities out of focus, and romanticized the role of “the Russians.”3. The USSR was multinational, not just Russian; Ukrainians and Byelorussians suffered more than any other group;4. Stalin was way more evil than westerners give him “credit” for; and5. Poland got screwed by all parties (including the allies) big time.These points are important and well-taken, but Davies tends to beat them to death in this extremely detailed overview. Some of his observations are nicely crafted. E.g., in describing Britain’s situation after March 1941 when Lend-Lease started, he suggests that Britain became an “island aircraft carrier, to which U.S. military assets could be transferred as the need arose.” Some of his observations are questionable. Hitler was “only human” if, albeit, “obnoxious”?!!! David Irving displayed “the wrong shade of opinion”?!!! Ariel Sharon “alleged” there were Jews who fought with the Allies?!!! Some 150,000 “Jews” fought with the Wehrmacht?!!! (N.B. This number actually represents the number of “mischlinge” or those who were designated as Jews only because of Hitler’s insistence in going back to the fourth generation past for racial purity. Most of these men were born and raised Christians and were ardent German patriots.) Oddly, in spite of Davies’ anti-Soviet, anti-Stalin bias, he doesn’t make a strong statement about Roosevelt’s pandering to Stalin. He does opine that Roosevelt was much more wary of Churchill as an “old imperialist” than of Stalin. Yet later in the narrative he avers (speaking of the Tehran summit) “Roosevelt was inclined to humor Stalin.” Davies’ world of the Gulag, the Katyn Forest, Sobibor and its ilk seems so alien from our current reality that it is hard to come away with useful lessons for the present. Tony Judt, in the New York Review of Books (May 1, 2008) (writing about WW2 historical treatments generally), charges that “teaching the War through vectors of the suffering of particular groups” (as does Davies) only serves to make us feel separate from other groups’ sufferings. Thus we lose a sense of a shared past in favor of au courant atrocities. The underlying message is that these “Historical Horror way stations” are past us, and “we may now advance…into a different and better era.” I’m afraid one of my biggest criticisms of this book is rather fuzzy: that is to say, in my opinion this book lacks “background music.” Davies’ long delineation of particulars is cold and lifeless, even with, and in spite of, the inclusion of many inspiring stories. As Saul Friedlander observes in “Reflections on Nazism,” language can establish emotional distance by “showing that all the chaos and horror is, after all, coherent and explainable.” Thus Davies evokes nothing with his recitation of numbers of war dead – not even understanding, since the numbers are beyond rational understanding. And of the cultures that were lost, there is not a word. I believe one can learn more about the pain and loss of WW2 from listening to the music of Kreisler than by reading Davies’ neutralized analyses.My husband loved this book; but he would much prefer lists of tanks and planes to evocations of life and love. I would have preferred to see Davies advance his theories in a nice long article in The Atlantic or The New Yorker, rather than a 560-page book. I give this book three stars; he would give it five. His review follows....(JAF)This is a far better book than my wife gives it credit for being. It is as much a book of historiography as a work of history. It points out how both popular and scholarly works in both the West and East (Soviet) have skewed their perceptions to promote the political preconceptions of their audiences. Davies emphasizes how Western historians have poorly expressed the comparative magnitudes of the war in the East with the war in the West, in which only about one fifth of the troops were employed and only one tenth of the fatalities occurred. He also shows that both Eastern and Western historians have underestimated the criminality of the Soviet behavior in the war. The Germans were not the only barbarians who fought the war. In his reassessment of the writing about the war, Davies observes that the Holocaust and the plight of the European Jews has had an enormous share of the ink spilled on the period. If this were the only book written about WWII, one would say that Davies greatly underestimated the enormity of the Nazi treatment of the Jews. But that is not his point. He is starting from a position in which there exists an enormous corpus of Holocaust literature, and remarkably little about the plight of the Serbs, the Gypsies, the Ukrainians, Bylorussians, and the entire Polish people. Moreover, little is written about the fate of 10 million Germans, mostly women and children, who were uprooted, many of whom were raped, and 2 million of whom perished during the Red Army's final thrust into the Reich. Davies's choice of organization does cause some repetitive treatment of some events, as he analyzes them sequentially from the respective coigns of vantage of military, politics, soldiers, civilians, and media. Nonetheless, I think that is necessary since he makes some fairly controversial assertions, and he must martial his authority on each contentious point. A sampling of Davies' observations and conclusions indicates how inaccurate was the general account of the war given by western media: 1. The first campaign of the war was a joint invasion of Poland by both Germany and the Soviet Union. 2. Russians composed barely more than 50% of the population of the Soviet Union. The Germans conquered only about 10% of the land mass of the Soviet Union, and most of the occupation covered the USSR's western republics, Ukraine and Byelorussia, not Russia proper. 3. The countries of Western Europe had no intention of giving up the colonial empires they held before the war. 4. The communists "proved to be incompetent at almost everything except espionage, deception and war." 5. The western allies needed a coherent rallying message, but the best they could come up with (and still include the Soviets) was "anti-facism." 6. Roosevelt's entourage was riddled with fellow travelers who proved incapable of grasping the nature of Stalin's regime. 7. The Soviets maintained larger concentration camps with more inmates than the Germans did. 8. The Soviet invasion of Finland in 1939 was as blatant as Germany's invasion of the USSR in 1941. 9. Forcible repatriation to the USSR involved millions who were being sent to their deaths or to long prison terms for the "crime" of not fighting to their deaths against the Germans. 10. The victory of the USA and Britain was at best only partial, leading to 45 years of the cold war, a military standoff with the co-victors and the imposition of a totalitarian tyranny in the Soviet zone of Europe. The book may not thoroughly original, but it is the best comprehensive reevaluation of our perception of the most significant event of the twentieth century that I have encountered. (JAB)
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This was extremely interesting and certainly casts a "new light" on interpretations of World War 2. The author puts forward the theory that the war was won on the Eastern front and that D-day etc were mere sideshows. He debunks the view of the "good" versus "evil Nazi " empire by suggesting that the Nazis and Soviets were both criminal enterprises led by 2 evil monsters Hitler and Stalin.Furthermore the end of the war brought misery and enslavement for Eastern Europe.He points out that huge injustices were meted out to the Poles in particular and prolonged suffering to many millions over Europe.This book is a masterpiece of Historical research and delivers a mighty punch.