Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Second Coming of the KKK: The Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and the American Political Tradition
The Second Coming of the KKK: The Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and the American Political Tradition
The Second Coming of the KKK: The Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and the American Political Tradition
Audiobook7 hours

The Second Coming of the KKK: The Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and the American Political Tradition

Written by Linda Gordon

Narrated by Jo Anna Perrin

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5

()

About this audiobook

By legitimizing bigotry and redefining so-called American values, a revived Klan in the 1920s left a toxic legacy that demands reexamination today.

Boasting 4 to 6 million members, the reassembled Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s dramatically challenged our preconceptions of hooded Klansmen, who through violence and lynching had established a Jim Crow racial hierarchy in the 1870s South. Responding to the "emergency" posed by the flood of immigrant "hordes"-Pope-worshipping Irish and Italians, "self-centered Hebrews," and "sly Orientals"-this "second Klan," as award-winning historian Linda Gordon vividly chronicles, spread principally above the Mason-Dixon Line in states like Indiana, Michigan, and Oregon. Condemning "urban" vices like liquor, prostitution, movies, and jazz as Catholic and Jewish "plots" to subvert American values, the rejuvenated Klan became entirely mainstream, attracting middle-class men and women through its elaborate secret rituals and mass "Klonvocations" before collapsing amid revelations of sordid sexual scandals, financial embezzlement, and Ponzi-like schemes. The Klan's brilliant melding of Christian values with racial bigotry and its lightning-like accretion of political power now becomes a sobering parable for the twenty-first century.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateOct 24, 2017
ISBN9781541480193
The Second Coming of the KKK: The Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s and the American Political Tradition

Related to The Second Coming of the KKK

Related audiobooks

United States History For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for The Second Coming of the KKK

Rating: 4.333333261904762 out of 5 stars
4.5/5

42 ratings3 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Such a profound listen on the KKK. Very enlightening. Also a sense of sarcasm that is wonderful.

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I had mixed views on this book. The author, early on, makes no bones that she has a point of view, and given her biographical blurb on the back cover, a reader is forewarned. There's a very strenuous effort to try to tie the KKK to the "Tea Party" and the current right, which is both distasteful and not, in my view, convincing. However, it must be said that that is confined to only a few areas of the book. The analysis of the workings of the 1920s Klan is done in a straightforward fashion; not a great deal of new ground is broken in terms of looking at Klan corruption (Korruption?), and there's some demographic analysis that purports to confound expectations, though I believe I've seen similar analyses that go back many decades (such as when American Heritage magazine looked at the issue). One point that is soft-pedaled, but that still shows up, is how tightly the Democratic Party was tied to the KKK, in spite of the status in GOP-dominated Indiana and sharply divided Oregon. To the author's credit, she does not pussy-foot around that problem, even if it is soft-pedaled. The analysis of the anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish nature of the Klan (and anti-Orthodox Christian, which hasn't really gotten much ink before) is fairly well done, and worth noting. Still somewhat mixed views on the book, but it is interesting.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Gordon offers an explicitly presentist account of the KKK in the 1920s through the 50s. She emphasizes how mainstream the KKK was in certain areas, especially the midwest, and how it adapted in different regions, emphasizing the danger of black political and social participation in the South and the danger of Asians in the Pacific Northwest, while targeting Catholics in northern cities where they were more numerous than (the groups we now call) nonwhites. Its opportunism was both strength and weakness—when it raged against the corruption of elites (sound familiar?) and then engaged in self-dealing, self-enrichment, and other shenanigans itself, its credibility was diminished. Still, many white people were able to avoid endorsing the KKK and its ever-looming threat of mob violence because so many of its preferred social policies were enacted anyway, such as non-Western European immigration restrictions and exclusionary laws in the Pacific Northwest. I liked Gordon’s point that the really un-American idea is the idea that there is consensus on much of anything in America. The KKK is American (as apple pie) and so is antiracism—the question is which one will be relegated to the dustheap of history.