Audiobook11 hours
Eyes on the Prize: America's Civil Rights Years, 1954-1965
Written by Juan Williams and Julian Bond
Narrated by Sean Crisden
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
About this audiobook
From the Montgomery bus boycott to the Little Rock Nine to the Selma-Montgomery march, thousands of ordinary people who participated in the American civil rights movement; their stories are told in Eyes on the Prize.
From leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr., to lesser-known figures such as Barbara Rose John and Jim Zwerg, each man and woman made the decision that something had to be done to stop discrimination. These moving accounts of the first decade of the civil rights movement are a tribute to the people, black and white, who took part in the fight for justice and the struggle they endured.
From leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr., to lesser-known figures such as Barbara Rose John and Jim Zwerg, each man and woman made the decision that something had to be done to stop discrimination. These moving accounts of the first decade of the civil rights movement are a tribute to the people, black and white, who took part in the fight for justice and the struggle they endured.
Author
Juan Williams
Juan Antonio Williams is a journalist and political analyst for Fox News Channel.
Related to Eyes on the Prize
Related audiobooks
Dark Sky Rising: Reconstruction and the Dawn of Jim Crow (Scholastic Focus) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Race Beat: The Press, the Civil Rights Struggle, and the Awakening of a Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The King Years: Historic Moments in the Civil Rights Movement Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stolen Justice: The Struggle for African American Voting Rights (Scholastic Focus) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Have Black Lives Ever Mattered? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Panther in Exile: The Pete O'Neal Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation's Founding Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5White Lies: The Double Life of Walter F. White and America's Darkest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, 10th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Forever Free: The Story of Emancipation and Reconstruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Birth of a Nation: Nat Turner and the Making of a Movement Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5To Make Our World Anew: Volume II: A History of African Americans from 1880 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Confederate and Neo-Confederate Reader: The "Great Truth" about the "Lost Cause" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMake Good the Promises: Reclaiming Reconstruction and Its Legacies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom on Trial: The First Post-Civil War Battle Over Civil Rights and Voter Suppression Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black against Empire: The History and Politics of the Black Panther Party Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Common Ground: Confederate Monuments and the Ongoing Fight for Racial Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Black Power and the American Myth: 50th Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Silent Shore: The Lynching of Matthew Williams and the Politics of Racism in the Free State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Black Hands, White House: Slave Labor and the Making of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Accident of Color: A Story of Race in Reconstruction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mirror to America: The Autobiography of John Hope Franklin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Alabama v. King: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Criminal Trial That Launched the Civil Rights Movement Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Force and Freedom: Black Abolitionists and the Politics of Violence Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lifting as We Climb: Black Women's Battle for the Ballot Box Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Girl in Black and White: The Story of Mary Mildred Williams and the Abolition Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Race and Reckoning: From Founding Fathers to Today’s Disruptors Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Discrimination & Race Relations For You
The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, 10th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Letter from Birmingham Jail Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5South to America: A Journey Below the Mason-Dixon to Understand the Soul of a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Grandmother's Hands: Racialized Trauma and the Pathway to Mending Our Hearts and Bodies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Uncomfortable Conversations with a Black Man Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Boy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Hidden Conversations: What Americans Really Think About Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letter to My Rage: An Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The FBI War on Tupac Shakur: The State Repression of Black Leaders from the Civil Rights Era to the 1990s Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (Oprah's Book Club Summer 2018 Selection) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Account of Race: The Supreme Court, White Supremacy, and the Ravaging of African American Voting Rights Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism 2nd Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Organ Thieves: The Shocking Story of the First Heart Transplant in the Segregated South Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Color of Money: Black Banks and the Racial Wealth Gap Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5SUMMARY Of White Fragility: Why It's So Hard For White People To Talk About Racism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cross and the Lynching Tree Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Say the Right Thing: How to Talk about Identity, Diversity, and Justice Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Fatigue: How Racism Erodes the Mind, Body, and Spirit Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5White Guilt: How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5America's Cultural Revolution: How the Radical Left Conquered Everything Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil You Know: A Black Power Manifesto Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Eyes on the Prize
Rating: 4.322580419354839 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
31 ratings1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eyes on the Prize utilizes the tactic of revisionist history -- that is, telling historical events from perspectives not often considered. For instance, the master narrative or textbook version of the Civil Rights movement is generally focused on Martin Luther King and how he empowered a repressed people.
Eyes on the Prize approaches the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s with a different perspective. It starts by introducing the social elements and people between the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1964, and explains how the second Civil Rights movement gained momentum and spread.
I was particularly struck by the story of Kenneth Clark and how his Dolls Study was used as evidence in the Briggs v. Clarendon County case. I think this instance is a great example of the combination of legal strategy and action with the intent to change public opinion. It is clear they were aware of the charged nature of this decision from the quote on page 20,
"It was highly unorthodox evidence to present in a courtroom, but the situation called for unusual legal ammunition."
I think this choice must have had more impact in the legal and public spheres than is focused on in this book, as it is now relatively common for a court of law to seek the expert opinion of a mental health worker. Psychologists and others who work with the mentally ill are often tainted with a sort of stigma-by-association, yet in a high-stakes trial, they chose to highlight not only a psychological study, but a study done by a black psychologist. It is clear why: Not only is the study itself sound, the ramifications are unsettling on an instinctual level. To prove the effect of discrimination on innocent young minds is an extremely effective way of inciting both sympathy and desire to act in the viewer -- it draws on the innate human desire to protect our children from harm.
In many ways, both the legal strategy and the public action danced around this concept. Charles Houston drew on it when he focused his initial efforts of educational desegregation oat the higher education levels, knowing that it would be less threatening to whites if it started in adult institutions rather than with children. He drew on this human instinct, too, whether consciously or not, when he filmed the contrasting situations of white and black children in their segregated learning environments. I suspect it is easier for a moderate white to be unconcerned about the plight of black children if they are not aware of the reality of that plight.
Clearly, hard-core racist segregationists didn't particularly care if black children were in school, in the gutter, or dead. But it wasn't the hard-core segregationists they needed to sway; it was the moderates and public opinion in general. I think Martin Luther King's advocacy of nonviolent, passive resistance also appealed, in a sense, to the parent's desire for their children's safety. The nonviolent movement showed through both word and actions that blacks were not the threat segregationists were trying to paint them as. Indeed, as the movement progressed, the juxtaposition of dignified non-violent resistance of the blacks and their white allies to the lashing anger and rage of the of segregationists highlighted who the real danger to society was.
This is further alluded to on page 113, in an interview with a white student at Central High in Little Rock, Arkansas:
"Other Whites, however, lost sympathy for the governor. 'I began to change,' remembers Craig Rains, a white senior at Central during the 1957-1958 school year, 'from being . . . a moderate, who, if I had my way, would have said, 'Let's don't integrate, because it's the state's right to decide.' I changed to someone who felt a real sense of compassion for those students, and felt like they deserved something that I had, and I also developed a real dislike for the people that were out there causing problems." (pg 113)
I wouldn't go so far as to argue that the entire civil rights movement was predicated on the human urge to protect the children, but I do think that a sensitivity and awareness of this shared instinct permeates the movement. It present in the cases they choose to argue and the order they chose to pursue them in. It was a consideration in the way blacks and their white allies presented themselves to the public.
In the arena of national attention, they often focused on the violence done to black children. In the arena of legal cases, they chose defendants who were either children or adults who were not considered a threat to those who needed to be protected. They also chose to focus on litigation that either did not affect children and was therefore not perceived as a threat to white children, or that focused on the harm done to black children, which incited sympathy in moderate whites. On top of these choices was the conscious decision to employ children in many marches and boycotts, which both made for moving publicity and allowed their parents more freedom of movement behind the scenes. Whether these choices were conscious or subconscious, they positively impacted both the participants in and the observers of the freedom movement on a very instinctive level.
The impact of this was even evidenced by segregationists, who in the immediate wake of the Emmet Till murder were, "outraged at what happened,"(43) and promised justice would be done. As it turned out, justice was not done -- but I do think it's telling that in the immediate aftermath of the murder, the reported reaction of, "all 'decent' people," was outrage and horror. The Southerners did not initially respond with a meh, or (worse), glee: They reacted with the disgust any right-thinking person should feel upon learning of such an incident. As the media attention grew and swelled, the white community drew back on itself and became defensive and angry, but their first reaction to the murder of a child was one of horror.
Today, many social activist groups say, "Think of the children," when they try to defend or argue some stance or other. I suspect the segregationists said this phrase, too, or some 1950's equivalent of it. It is interesting that a successful social movement is the one that does think of the children, and that considers the impact of their movement on all children, rather than just their children.