Who Wrote the New Testament?: The Making of the Christian Myth
3.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
The Making of the Christian Myth
Commencing in mid February 2004, SBS TV (Australia) will run a two–part documentary based on this title.
In this groundbreaking and controversial book, Burton Mack brilliantly exposes how the Gospels are fictional mythologies created by different communities for various purposes and are only distantly related to the actual historical Jesus.
Mack‘s innovative scholarship which boldly challenges traditional Christian understanding‘ will change the way you approach the New Testament and think about how Christianity arose.
The clarity of Mack‘s prose and the intelligent pursuit of his subject make compelling reading. Mack‘s investigation of the various groups and strands of the early Christian community out of which were generated the texts of Christianity‘s first anthology of religious literature and makes sense of a topic that has been confusing.
Burton L. Mack
Burton L. Mack is John Wesley Professor of the New Testament at the school of Theology at Claremont and the author of The Lost Gospel: The Book Q and Christian Origin and A Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins.
Read more from Burton L. Mack
The Lost Gospel: The Book of Q & Christian Origins Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho Wrote the New Testament?: The Making of the Christian Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Critical Times for America: The Politics of Cultural Amnesia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Who Wrote the New Testament?
Related ebooks
The Rise and Fall of the Bible: The Unexpected History of an Accidental Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hebrew Bible: A Critical Companion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReading the Bible Again For the First Time: Taking the Bible Seriously But Not Literally Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Has Archaeology Buried the Bible? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bible: A Biography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gospels Behind the Gospels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJesus for the Non-Religious Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How the Bible Came to Be Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Sacred Texts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jesus Dynasty: The Hidden History of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Can We Trust the Bible on the Historical Jesus? Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Historical Jesus in Context Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jesus Discovery: The Resurrection Tomb that Reveals the Birth of Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bart Ehrman Interpreted Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWho Wrote the Bible? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Forged: Writing in the Name of God--Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Triumph of Christianity: How a Forbidden Religion Swept the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Birth of Christianity: Discovering What Happened In the Years Immediately After the Execution of Jesus Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Excavating Jesus: Beneath the Stones, Behind the Texts: Revised and Updated Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Paul and Jesus: How the Apostle Transformed Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus from Outer Space: What the Earliest Christians Really Believed about Christ Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Scientist in the Early Roman Empire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Jesus Became Christian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Amazing Colossal Apostle: The Search for the Historical Paul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dead Sea Scrolls: A Biography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus the Jew Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Christianity For You
The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex: Creating a Marriage That's Both Holy and Hot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Uninvited: Living Loved When You Feel Less Than, Left Out, and Lonely Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Don't Give the Enemy a Seat at Your Table: It's Time to Win the Battle of Your Mind... Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Holy Bible (World English Bible, Easy Navigation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Winning the War in Your Mind: Change Your Thinking, Change Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5New Morning Mercies: A Daily Gospel Devotional Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Enoch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Draw the Circle: The 40 Day Prayer Challenge Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Your Brain's Not Broken: Strategies for Navigating Your Emotions and Life with ADHD Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Workbook: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Present Over Perfect: Leaving Behind Frantic for a Simpler, More Soulful Way of Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I'll Start Again Monday: Break the Cycle of Unhealthy Eating Habits with Lasting Spiritual Satisfaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Decluttering at the Speed of Life: Winning Your Never-Ending Battle with Stuff Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anxious for Nothing: Finding Calm in a Chaotic World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law of Connection: Lesson 10 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Lead When You're Not in Charge: Leveraging Influence When You Lack Authority Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Who Wrote the New Testament?
33 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5I agree that modern society sometimes misunderstands and misuses the Bible. However, this arises, in part, because some "scholars" misrepresent it as not reliable and not worth reading. I find it incredible that a professor at a college linked to Methodism claims to be surprised by the Bible's influence in the modern world. It is as if he simply sweeps aside 2000 years of European and world history and says "Huh?". The book assumes that the traditional reading is incorrect and puts forward an alternative. He claims that "scholars locate . . ." [that is, they date] the New Testament over one hundred years. As Wikipedia would say "who?" and "citation needed". He simply makes these claims without providing support and although he speaks of the huge flow of literature around Biblical studies, he does not address any of the huge number of volumes that support the alternative view. Indeed, there are authors who would date the canonical (New Testament) documents even earlier than the mainstream consensus. It should be noted that the idea of extremely late dates for e.g.; Acts arise out of 18th century scepticism and have no strong evidence behind them. Instead, Acts shows a reliable knowledge of the time in which it is set. For example, a plaque supporting the existence of Gallio - a proconsul mentioned in Acts - was found in the 20th century.
I accept that Jesus' vision of the Kingdom of God had (and has) a strong social dimension, but, unlike the author, I see no problem with seeing this as connected with the God of Israel. The very terminology of the "kingdom of God" is Jewish and Jesus was a Jew. Whatever your view of the identity of Jesus, it should not be difficult to see that any Jewish reformer or prophet would not and could not put forward an agenda that did not meet with the approval of God. The idea that Jesus's teachings were contextless and such a connection had to be forced by his followers makes no sense. The idea that Jesus is similar to the Cynic philosophers has already been put forward by the Jesus Seminar and has been thoroughly debunked, as has their procedure of deciding authenticity of texts by voting. See, for example, "Fabricating Jesus" by Craig A. Evans and Evans's "The Misplaced Jesus".
Mack starts with the presupposition that the New Testament cannot be trusted and seems to assume that he and he alone, apparently, can work out what really happened. As with other authors of this type of literature, Mack simply lumps together first century texts with later gnostic works of the second or third centuries to argue for a mix of very different groups; for example, he argues that the Gospel of Thomas is very early, when most scholars recognise it as late 2nd century (ad 175.)
He argues for the existence of many early different views, with no centrist tradition, but he does not explain how the original teachings of Jesus spread so widely and were so influential that all these very early groups wished to claim Jesus for their own whilst, at the same time, supposedly ignoring most of what Jesus said. This flies in the face of both Jewish and Gentile practice, whereby disciples/followers would be careful to preserve what their teacher said. On the other hand, the traditional view makes sense: the early Christian movement spread rapidly, it impacted both Jews and Gentiles and as it grew it became possible for divergence to grow and for other groups to try to co-opt Jesus for their own purposes.
In contrast to this traditional view Mack claims that the New Testament we have is ultimately a product of Constantine's time. Constantine wanted to favour a particular moderate or centrist type of Christianity as it fitted his needs. The author argues that this "centrist tradition" had "positioned itself against gnostic forms of Christianity on the one hand, and radical forms of Pauline and spiritist communities on the other" - but he does not explain, if that is the case, how Pauline letters and apocalyptic material (e.g.; Revelation and parts of the Gospels) survived this process.
He ignores early tradition in stating that most of the New Testament was written by anonymous authors and only some letters of Paul and the Revelation are by named authors. While it is true that many texts are not signed, there are strong traditions around authorship, plus the strong sense that the early Church did not just accept any text that was going. In "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses" Richard Bauckham shows that there was not a process of free floating oral tradition, rather the communities of believers relied on the eye-witness testimony of living people. The followers of Jesus did not all just disappear the day after Jesus died. Both the New Testament and Church tradition show them living on for decades after. Written documents were produced to preserve the witness of these people as time passed. "The Jesus Legend" by Paul Rhodes Eddy and Gregory A. Boyd also argues for this and for the existence of a reliable oral tradition that fits with the oral culture of the time. The picture painted by Evans, Eddy and Boyd and other historians* fits with what we know of the geographical spread of Christianity and the rise of later movements. *See the many works by N.T. Wright and "A Marginal Jew" (4 volumes) by John P. Meier, for examples of serious historical scholarship.
Mack is aware of conservative scholarship, but cherry picks examples, so that he can say "Are we to feel confident about the accuracy of the gospel’s account on the basis of three second-century fragments that a scholar has tried to redate?" (Referring to thor e work of Carsten Tiede). Mack may be right about the failings of Tiede's work, but this quote is a confidence trick, since confidence in the Gospels is not based on fragments, nor on the work of a single scholar - but the sarcasm sounds good. Notice as well, that Mack does not apply his criticisms or his sarcasm to his use of Thomas, which most scholars recognise as a late Gnostic text and not an early witness to Jesus.
As an aside: The traditional view also makes sense of the early Christians fortitude and willingness to suffer and even die, rather than renege on their faith. If the spiritual aspect of Christian faith is a late invention and so utterly alien to Jesus, why were so many people willing to die for it and indeed why was there any persecution of the believers? Jesus was not crucified for telling people "to be nice" to one another. Christian claims revolved around a new King - the Messiah - sent by the one God of Israel. This picture of Jesus and the Church goes far to explain both Jewish and Roman hostility, a fractured picture of many, utterly diverse, christianities does not. After all, if it was so fractured, how did it become such a large and effective movement that Constantine felt compelled to take notice of it? One might have expected an emperor to avoid all mention of a Messiah and to prefer an other-worldly, purely immaterial Gnostic Jesus. But that is not what happened.
Mack starts from a position of skepticism and creates a portrait of Jesus and the early Church to fit. This is precisely what Albert Schweitzer charged the 19th century "Liberals" with doing - looking into a deep well in search of Jesus and seeing, instead, only their own reflection. We see this in the Jesus Seminar, also where, despite their supposed agreement as to what Jesus said, the various members cannot agree on a single portrait of Jesus and have come up with a multiplicity of their own. The problem is that the New Testament is our only major witness to Jesus, if you ignore it you have little or nothing left that is not dependent upon the New Testament and you either give up or you come up with a Jesus and Christianit(y)/ies of your own invention. The fact that the scholarly tools and presuppositions used by scholars such as Mack have not come to a consensus should tell us something. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A excellent book to anyone that has serious and not based on faith interest on the Bible. Yes, there is some dose of speculation but how to investigate these times without some assumptions. And Mack knows how support his thesis with clever clues, building a consistent construction.The amazing chapters about Paul's Gospels analysis give us a impressive idea of Paul's character showing him as a compound of sincerity and charlatanism, common characteristics of a Mythmaker.
2 people found this helpful
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I was surprised at the lack of sources and the disappointing amount of opinion.