Understanding Deliberative Democracy
()
About this ebook
This compilation is a comprehensive guide to contemporary deliberative democracy thought. It contains four guides, beginning with the basic tenets of deliberative democracy theory in Deliberative Democracy Basics, before moving on to explore the deliberative theories of John Rawls, Jurgen Habermas, and John Dryzek. The four guides are:
Deliberative Democracy Basics
This concise, essay length guide covers the basics of deliberative democracy by canvassing a spectrum of theories on the subject. It explains what is unique about deliberative theories of democracy, what they all have in common, as well as how they differ.
Jurgen Habermas and Deliberative Democracy
Jurgen Habermas is one of the most influential thinkers of our time. This detailed, article length guide examines his theory of deliberative democracy and covers many of the central concepts such as communicative reason, communicative power, and the ideal speech community.
John Rawls and Deliberative Democracy
This detailed, article length guide is a clearly written, in-depth analysis of John Rawls's deliberative democracy theory. It covers important concepts in Rawls's theory including the idea of public reason and the politicised public sphere.
John Dryzek and Deliberative Democracy
John Dryzek argues for a transnational deliberative democracy that moves beyond the nation state. This detailed, article length guide outlines Dryzek's radical concept of citizenship, his arguments about de-traditionalisation of societies through globalisation, and a transnational public sphere.
sphere.
Hercules Bantas
Dr Hercules Bantas has been teaching and reading the human sciences for the better part of a decade. It is his opinion that he is too often immersed in some weighty tome or other, the authors of which always use one thousand words where one hundred words would suffice. It was while juggling no less than three weighty tomes by the same author and trying to understand what the fellow was trying to say that the idea of The Reluctant Geek Guides was born. He is well aware that publishing clearly written and unambiguous guides to important ideas in the human sciences is frowned upon in some circles, but he's going to do it anyway. Despite his well documented grumpiness, Hercules claims to like people and can be contacted by email at reluctantgeek[at]tpg.com.au.
Read more from Hercules Bantas
Understanding Essay Writing: A Guide To Writing Essays By Someone Who Grades Them Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Accounting Fundamentals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nine Thinkers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy, Citizenship, and the Internet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Political Internet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLove Lust & Petty Crime Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriters Disrupting Publishers: How Self-Published Writers Disrupted the Publishing Industry, 2nd Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTime in Fiction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Understanding Deliberative Democracy
Related ebooks
Rawls and Habermas: Reason, Pluralism, and the Claims of Political Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The State We're In: Reflecting on Democracy's Troubles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Deliberative Democracy? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Democracy and Its Crisis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Democratic Theory of Michael Oakeshott: Discourse, Contingency, and 'The Politics of Conversation' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for John Rawls's "A Theory of Justice" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Democratizing Deliberation: A Political Theory Anthology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction To The Thought Of Ernesto Laclau: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHabermas and Giddens on Praxis and Modernity: A Constructive Comparison Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Movements in Times of Democratic Transition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Of "Political Sociology" By Jacques Legroye: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Idea of a Liberal Theory: A Critique and Reconstruction Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Supranational citizenship Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Specter of Democracy: What Marx and Marxists Haven't Understood and Why Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiberal Languages: Ideological Imaginations and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits of Political Theory: Oakeshott's Philosophy of Civil Association Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMax Weber: A Critical Introduction Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Anti-Democratic Thought Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of A Theory of Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Stuart Mill: Proportional Representation is Personal Representation. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Principles and Politics in Contemporary Britain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritique of Instrumental Reason Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Year 30: Germany's Second Chance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeynes and Marx Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Legendary Past: Michael Oakeshott on Imagination and Political Identity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivil Society in the Age of Monitory Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mindfulness in Plain English: 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Understanding Deliberative Democracy
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Understanding Deliberative Democracy - Hercules Bantas
Understanding Deliberative Democracy
Hercules Bantas
Published by The Reluctant Geek
Melbourne, Australia
Copyright Hercules Bantas 2010
Table of Contents
Deliberative Democracy Basics
John Rawls and Deliberative Democracy
Júrgen Habermas and Deliberative Democracy
John Dryzek and Deliberative Democracy
Author's Notes
This compilation is a complete guide to contemporary deliberative democracy thought. It begins with the basic tenets of deliberative democracy theory, before moving on to explore the work of three leading theorists, namely John Rawls, Jurgen Habermas, and John Dryzek. The collection is made up four guides: Deliberative Democracy Basics, John Rawls and Deliberative Democracy, Jürgen Habermas and Deliberative Democracy, and John Dryzek and Deliberative Democracy.
Deliberative Democracy Basics
To label a democratic theory as 'deliberative' is to say that it has, at its core, the exercise of public reason through the political deliberations of citizens. This is because deliberative theories of democracy focus on communication rather than preference aggregation, which is not to say that these theories abandon voting and elections all together. Rather, a deliberative democracy is a democracy in which citizens make decisions and solve political problems through some sort of deliberative process, which may or may not involve elections and voting.
Most theories of deliberative democracy would have deliberative elements introduced to an existing political system, utilising existing social and political institutions such as churches, corporations, unions, parties, lobby groups, courts, and parliaments. This would mean that rather than simply counting votes, citizens would be encouraged to participate in public deliberation in order to solve political problems (Stokes, 2002, p. 40), and most theories of deliberative democracy associate legitimacy of the law with the exercise of public reason. The following review considers the various starting points and problems addressed by diverse theories of deliberative democracy, concludes on the similarities and differences between them, and constructs a spectrum of issues addressed by theories of deliberative democracy.
John Rawls is a well-known proponent of liberal thought, who has set out a deliberative theory in his book The Law of Peoples (Rawls, 1999). He articulates his theory of deliberation in order to try to solve problems of legitimacy in law by equating the legislative process with public deliberation on matters of political import. He uses the idea of public reason as the focus of his theory, arguing that ‘...in public reason comprehensive doctrines of truth or right [are] replaced by an idea of the politically reasonable addressed to citizens as citizens’ (Rawls, 1999, p. 132). He argues that there are three elements of deliberative democracy: the idea of public reason; a framework of constitutional institutions; and a general willingness by citizens to realise the ideal of public reason (1999, p. 139). His theory restricts political deliberation to political elites, such as elected officials and judges on constitutional courts, as well as confining public deliberation to a subsection of the public sphere.
Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson present an alternate liberal conception of deliberative democracy. Their iteration of deliberative democracy sets out to solve the problem of ruling elites making political decisions that have serious ramifications for the state but that have not been through a process of legitimisation by the polity. They start from an observation that in many liberal-democratic countries there is an increasing cynicism about politics and politicians among citizens who feel less represented by elites who are less accountable for their decisions. They base their theory of deliberative democracy on the assumption that citizens are not passive individuals or subjects of government. Rather, they are autonomous agents capable of taking part in the governance of their society (Gutmann & Thompson, 2004, p. 3). They outline four characteristics of a deliberative democracy:
1. Reasons for acting need to be justifiable, and should be acceptable by free and reasonable people seeking fair terms of co-operation
2. Public debate
3. Binding decisions that can be changed with the passage of time
4. A dynamic process that aims at justifiable decisions, but does not guarantee them
Using these four characteristics, they propose the following definition of deliberative democracy,
...a form of government in which free and equal citizens (and their representatives), justify decisions in a process in which they give one another reasons that are mutually acceptable and generally accessible, with the aim of reaching conclusions that are binding in the present on all citizens but open to challenge in the future (2004, p. 7)
Like Rawls, they maintain the institutions of liberal democracy and use deliberation as the tool to solve political problems.
Habermas bases his deliberative democracy theory on critical theory, although he has been criticised by some commentators for straying too far into liberal territory (Dryzek, 2000, p. 27). Habermas uses communicative reason to establish a constitutional framework for his theory and to combine a procedural system of democracy with his theory of discourse ethics. Habermas (1996) articulates most of his deliberative theory in his book Between Facts and Norms, and the title of the text hints at his motivation. He attempts to overcome fissures between his normative political theory of discourse ethics and real-world political practices. The discourse principle is integral to discourse ethics and it requires that all affected by a decision be entitled to participate in the deliberation about what to do. This means that for some nation-wide political problems, all citizens in the state are entitled to participate in the deliberation. He argues that political power has its origin in deliberations in the public sphere. The democratic practice of voting transforms public opinion in the public sphere into communicative power. Legislation is the mechanism that then transforms communicative power into administrative power. A critically enabled public sphere, free from institutional interference is central to his theory of deliberative democracy.
Warren argues that the proceduralism of Habermas’s theory of deliberative democracy differs from the liberal account by imposing constraints on ‘the medium’ rather than ‘the substance’ of political decision-making (Warren, 2002, p. 196). Where liberal theorists argue that the topics for deliberation should be ‘reasonable’ or ‘morally neutral’, deliberative proceduralism uses law to block the forces of coercive power and money (2002, p. 196).
Joshua Cohen proposes a more radical theory of deliberative democracy. He begins with a critique of Rawls’s deliberative theories, and attempts to solve many of the inconsistencies he finds. He argues that in order for a deliberative democracy to exist and function effectively, the institutions of that democracy must support deliberative activity. He formulates the ‘ideal deliberative procedure’ that will highlight the properties that these democratic institutions should embody (Cohen, 1997, p. 73). He argues that there are three general aspects to any deliberation: an agenda, proposed alternative solutions to the problems on the agenda, and settling on a solution. Democratic legitimacy requires outcomes that are the result of free and reasoned agreement amongst equals.
The discursive theories of Dryzek are not limited to the nation state, and he describes a democratic polity that is transnational in nature. His theory centres on communicative action in a transnational public sphere that ‘...is an informal, communicative realm that can be contrasted with the constitutional exercise of authority (though of course it can influence the latter)’ (Dryzek, 2006, p. 154). Dryzek’s theory attempts to solve problems presented by divergent conceptions of democracy and the bias towards liberal ideology that he argues exists within deliberative thought. He bases his arguments in critical theory and develops a conception of deliberative democracy that is not dependant on liberal institutions. Deliberations in this transnational public sphere do not lead directly to legislation, but rather they influence and construct international outcomes through mechanisms such as citizen mobilisation, protest actions, and similar political activities. These activities usually spring from a politicised civil society that ‘...consists of self-limiting political associations oriented by a relationship with the state, but not seeking any share in state power’ (Dryzek, 2000, p. 100).
Deliberative democracy is a label used to describe a range of democratic theories that utilise citizen deliberation and communication in order to solve political problems. The theories of Rawls, Habermas, and Dryzek are a good example of this disparity. In the spectrum of theories discussed above, starting at the liberal Rawls and moving in order to the radical Dryzek, they represent