Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong
5/5
()
About this ebook
The "happy meat" position does not challenge our large-scale mistreatment of non-human beings, but rather serves to support it. That is among the core claims of this essay, which argues that the rejection of the "happy meat" position is critical if we are to end the extreme horrors that humanity inflicts upon other animals.
"Magnus Vinding argues powerfully against eating 'happy meat'." — Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, author of The Life You Can Save and Animal Liberation
"Like child abuse, animal abuse can be practised with more or less cruelty. Magnus Vinding argues persuasively that we shouldn't be doing it at all. In his latest work, Vinding explores the insidious concept of 'happy meat' – a tribute to the human capacity for self-deception. Harming other sentient beings should not be a lifestyle choice in any civilised society." — David Pearce, author of The Hedonistic Imperative
Magnus Vinding
Magnus Vinding is the author of Speciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Implications of Rejecting It (2015), Reflections on Intelligence (2016), You Are Them (2017), Effective Altruism: How Can We Best Help Others? (2018), Suffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications (2020), Reasoned Politics (2022), and Essays on Suffering-Focused Ethics (2022).He is blogging at magnusvinding.com
Read more from Magnus Vinding
The Meaning of Life: An Examination of Purpose Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree Will: An Examination of Human Freedom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nature of Mathematics Given Physicalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMoral Truths: The Foundation of Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays on Suffering-Focused Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Simple Case for Going Vegan Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5In Defense of Nuance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Speciesism of Leaving Nature Alone and the Theoretical Case for “Wildlife Anti-Natalism” Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Induction Is All We Got: Essays on Epistemology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInduction Is All We Got Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReasoned Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReflections on Intelligence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Should We Do?: Essays on Cause Prioritization and Fundamental Values Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong
Related ebooks
Animal Rights: Liberty and Justice for All Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSuffering-Focused Ethics: Defense and Implications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Simple Case for Going Vegan Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why We Should Go Vegan Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Barking in the Wind: Conflict with Human Apathy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Are Them Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeciesism: Why It Is Wrong and the Implications of Rejecting It Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Striking at the Roots: A Practical Guide to Animal Activism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5If You Tame Me: Understanding Our Connection With Animals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5For the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The No-Nonsense Guide to Animal Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoices for Animal Liberation: Inspirational Accounts by Animal Rights Activists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Moral Lives of Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Save-My-Life School: A First Responder's Mental Health Journey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Humane Economy: How Innovators and Enlightened Consumers Are Transforming the Lives of Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Animal Code: Giving Animals Rights & Respect Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding Our Compassion Footprint Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everyone Loves a Good Train Wreck: Why We Can't Look Away Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Vivisection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntervention or Protest: Acting for Nonhuman Animals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking A Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animals Property & The Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Caught in Play: How Entertainment Works on You Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimal Rights: A Historical Anthology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life in Lakes and Rivers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sustainability Secret: Rethinking Our Diet to Transform the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJust Think about It Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Philosophy For You
The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The School of Life: An Emotional Education: An Emotional Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Why "Happy Meat" Is Always Wrong - Magnus Vinding
Why Happy Meat
Is Always Wrong
In this essay I would like to delve into an issue that is often raised as an objection against veganism, namely the issue of so-called happy meat
.
As I define it, the happy meat
position is that it is justifiable – in practice – to bring non-human animals into existence in order for us to eat their flesh, as long as we make an effort to treat them well. Note that this is a distinctly practical position, meaning that it concerns what can be justified in the real world rather than in some hypothetical world. (Thus, a purely theoretical happy meat
position that is not related to our actual world will not be my concern in this essay; for a defense of ethical views that rule out happy meat
directly at the theoretical level, see my book Suffering-Focused Ethics as well as Teo Ajantaival’s Minimalist axiologies sequence.)
I will seek to refute this happy meat
position in two different ways, each of which, I think, lend significant support to its wrongness. The first way is the simplest one: I will briefly point out that according to some basic and widely accepted ethical principles and intuitions, the happy meat
position is not justifiable. Yet not everyone will be convinced by this line of argument. Some might object that this first approach