Why John Roberts Was Wrong About Healthcare: A Conservative Critique of The Supreme Court's Obamacare Ruling
5/5
()
About this ebook
During Chief Justice Roberts’s first seven terms on the Supreme Court of the United States, he distinguished himself as a fair-minded jurist and a true constitutional scholar—a man seemingly committed to the rule of law and to core constitutional principles. That hard-earned distinction was turned on its head when, on June 28, 2012, the Chief Justice—writing for a five-to-four majority in National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebilius—essentially re-wrote key provisions of Obamacare in order to uphold the law, and allow it to be approved, in the face of a justified constitutional challenge.
Now United States Senator Mike Lee presents a conservative critique of this controversial ruling, and explains why John Roberts in particular was wrong to vote to preserve the act. In an attempt to be perceived as fair in the mainstream media, Roberts allowed himself to be swayed by outside influences -- influences to which a Supreme Court justice is supposed to be absolutely immune. Not only that, Senator Lee explains, Roberts conceded that much of the Obamacare act was unconstitutional; yet he instructed states simply to ignore those parts, instead of recognizing that those parts made the entire act invalid.
A smart, fair and evenhanded argument, Why John Roberts Was Wrong provides a definitive, concise argument against Obamacare.
Sen. Mike Lee
Senator Mike Lee is a United States Senator for Utah, serving as member of the Judiciary Committee and as ranking member of the Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights. He graduated from Brigham Young University with a Bachelor of Science in Political Science, and graduated from BYU's Law School in 1997. He then served as law clerk to future Supreme Court Justice Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Lee spent several years as an attorney with the law firm Sidley & Austin and then served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Salt Lake City arguing cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals. Lee and his wife live in Alpine, Utah.
Related to Why John Roberts Was Wrong About Healthcare
Related ebooks
Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tempting of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men in Black: How the Supreme Court Is Destroying America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Defending the Constitution: Alan Dershowitz's Senate Argument Against Impeachment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScalia's Court: A Legacy of Landmark Opinions and Dissents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Credentialed Court: Inside the Cloistered, Elite Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDavid's Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClarence Thomas and the Lost Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBarry Goldwater: The Biography of a Conservative Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Republic, Not a Democracy: How to Restore Sanity in America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Price of Principle: Why Integrity Is Worth the Consequences Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Case Against Impeaching Trump: by Alan Dershowitz | Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Society: How Conservatives Took the Law Back from Liberals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLincoln & Liberty: Wisdom for the Ages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRollback: Repealing Big Government Before the Coming Fiscal Collapse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat the (Bleep) Just Happened?: The Happy Warrior's Guide to the Great American Comeback Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Scalia: A Court of One Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why We Must Defend the Electoral College Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Forgotten Conservative: Rediscovering Grover Cleveland Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Republic, Not an Empire: Reclaiming America's Destiny Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Electile Dysfunction: A Guide for Unaroused Voters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Republican Workers Party: How the Trump Victory Drove Everyone Crazy, and Why It Was Just What We Needed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Nation Like No Other: Why American Exceptionalism Matters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Drift: Stopping America's Slide to Socialism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fair Tax Book: Saying Goodbye to the Income Tax and the IRS Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
American Government For You
Unwoke: How to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Laptop from Hell: Hunter Biden, Big Tech, and the Dirty Secrets the President Tried to Hide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inside the CIA Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Watergate: A New History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Leadership: In Turbulent Times Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Corruptible: Who Gets Power and How It Changes Us Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/525 Lies: Exposing Democrats’ Most Dangerous, Seductive, Damnable, Destructive Lies and How to Refute Them Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trumpty Dumpty Wanted a Crown: Verses for a Despotic Age Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Treating People Well: The Extraordinary Power of Civility at Work and in Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lemon Tree: An Arab, a Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We're Polarized Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Profiles in Courage: Deluxe Modern Classic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A History of the American People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 9/11 Report: The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Why John Roberts Was Wrong About Healthcare
2 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Why John Roberts Was Wrong About Healthcare - Sen. Mike Lee
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP
Title ImageContents
Foreword: The Judgment of Solomon
Introduction: National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius
I. The Court’s Ruling
II. Why the Court Was Wrong to Rewrite the Mandate as a Tax
III. Why the Supreme Court Was Wrong to Rewrite the ACA’s Medicaid-Expansion Provisions to Save the Rest of the ACA
IV. What Happened to Chief Justice Roberts?
V. Where Do We Go from Here?
Conclusion
Foreword: The Judgment of Solomon
My day started early on Thursday, June 28, 2012. I had scheduled a series of news-media interviews, which began at about 7:00 a.m., and would last throughout the day. By late morning, the U.S. Supreme Court would be issuing its ruling in a landmark case involving the constitutionality of President Obama’s defining legislative accomplishment, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), known to many as Obamacare.
It was rare to see such intense media interest in a single case pending before the Supreme Court. This case was different.
Having served as a law clerk to Justice Alito (first while he was serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and then again during his first full term on the Supreme Court), I knew that it is often difficult to predict how the Court might rule. But I also knew that in some instances, you can make a pretty good guess as to how each justice might vote if you know what to look for.
I also knew that I would need to rely on a time-proven strategy I had learned from my dad decades earlier. My father, the late Rex E. Lee, served as President Reagan’s solicitor general and argued fifty-nine cases before the Supreme Court during his career. My dad used to say, When trying to predict how the Supreme Court might rule, the formula is simple, but not always easy: Count to five.
At the conclusion of the four-day oral argument in late March 2012, I had felt quite confident that I could count to five in the Obamacare case. I predicted that Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito would likely find the ACA unconstitutional at least in part, and perhaps in its entirety.
Arguments lead to decisions. The ruling in this case was announced on June 28, the final day of the Court’s October 2011 term. That morning, I took my seat in the courtroom. I couldn’t help but think about the countless times I had sat in the same room—not just as a law clerk and lawyer, but beginning at the age of ten, when I started attending my dad’s arguments before the Supreme Court.
There is a carved marble frieze above the bench on the courtroom’s east wall. It has captured my attention on countless occasions. The frieze features two men seated in what appear to be thrones with a large eagle behind them, wings outstretched. The man on the left, who has a large book of law at his side, is known within the Supreme Court as the Majesty of Law.
The man on the right holds a large fasces—an ancient Roman symbol of authority consisting of a tightly bound bundle of rods—and is known as the Power of Government.
Both men appear unusually but equally strong, sending the message that each is capable of keeping the other in check, and that when the two are united, they constitute a formidable force.
Corresponding friezes, one on the north wall and the other on the south, depict a long line of ancient lawgivers, including Moses, Hammurabi, Solomon, and King John. A final frieze on the west wall contains carved figures representing the conflict between good and evil: Virtue, charity, peace, harmony, and security are depicted on one side, and vice, crime, corruption, slander, deception, and despotic power on the other. The evil side conjures a feeling of chaos, while the good side creates an impression of order.
Taken together, the friezes seem to hold the law, and with it the history of civilization, in balance.
Much like the stone figures in the courtroom, I was surrounded by witnesses of the legal landscape, guardians of the proper role of government. Aided by my surroundings, I became keenly aware of each generation’s role in maintaining the rule of law.
As the press gallery began to fill with the small handful of reporters fortunate enough to get a seat in the courtroom, I gave additional thought to what I might say to the army of reporters lining up outside, most of whom were equipped with cameras, microphones, and other modern equipment that would enable them to tell the entire world how the Court had ruled as soon as this hearing had concluded. Unlike