Who Owns Antiquity?: Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage
By James Cuno
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Whether antiquities should be returned to the countries where they were found is one of the most urgent and controversial issues in the art world today, and it has pitted museums, private collectors, and dealers against source countries, archaeologists, and academics. Maintaining that the acquisition of undocumented antiquities by museums encourages the looting of archaeological sites, countries such as Italy, Greece, Egypt, Turkey, and China have claimed ancient artifacts as state property, called for their return from museums around the world, and passed laws against their future export. But in Who Owns Antiquity?, one of the world's leading museum directors vigorously challenges this nationalistic position, arguing that it is damaging and often disingenuous. "Antiquities," James Cuno argues, "are the cultural property of all humankind," "evidence of the world's ancient past and not that of a particular modern nation. They comprise antiquity, and antiquity knows no borders."
Cuno argues that nationalistic retention and reclamation policies impede common access to this common heritage and encourage a dubious and dangerous politicization of antiquities--and of culture itself. Antiquities need to be protected from looting but also from nationalistic identity politics. To do this, Cuno calls for measures to broaden rather than restrict international access to antiquities. He advocates restoration of the system under which source countries would share newly discovered artifacts in exchange for archaeological help, and he argues that museums should again be allowed reasonable ways to acquire undocumented antiquities. Cuno explains how partage broadened access to our ancient heritage and helped create national museums in Cairo, Baghdad, and Kabul. The first extended defense of the side of museums in the struggle over antiquities, Who Owns Antiquity? is sure to be as important as it is controversial.
Some images inside the book are unavailable due to digital copyright restrictions.
James Cuno
James Cuno is president and CEO of the J. Paul Getty Trust and former director of the Art Institute of Chicago. His books include Who Owns Antiquity?: Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage (Princeton).
Related to Who Owns Antiquity?
Related ebooks
The Brutish Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Chasing Aphrodite: The Hunt for Looted Antiquities at the World's Richest Museum Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Do Museums Still Need Objects? Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Contesting Antiquity in Egypt: Archaeologies, Museums, and the Struggle for Identities from World War I to Nasser Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArt, commerce and colonialism 1600–1800 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAfrica’s Struggle for Its Art: History of a Postcolonial Defeat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInside the Lost Museum: Curating, Past and Present Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whose Culture?: The Promise of Museums and the Debate over Antiquities Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Curators and Culture: The Museum Movement in America, 1740-1870 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Scattered Finds: Archaeology, Egyptology and Museums Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Museum Object Lessons for the Digital Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhose Muse?: Art Museums and the Public Trust Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Decolonizing Museums: Representing Native America in National and Tribal Museums Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Archives of Dispossession: Recovering the Testimonios of Mexican American Herederas, 1848–1960 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsModernism on the Nile: Art in Egypt between the Islamic and the Contemporary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMuseums Matter: In Praise of the Encyclopedic Museum Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Greek Art and Aesthetics in the Fourth Century B.C. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Restitution: The Return of Cultural Artefacts Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Women and museums 1850–1914: Modernity and the gendering of knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJournal of Roman Pottery Studies: Volume 17 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReal, Recent, or Replica: Precolumbian Caribbean Heritage as Art, Commodity, and Inspiration Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Museum Curator's Guide: Understanding, Managing and Presenting Objects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrivate Life in New Kingdom Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stealing History: Tomb Raiders, Smugglers, and the Looting of the Ancient World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlunder: Napoleon's Theft of Veronese's Feast Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Contraband Corridor: Making a Living at the Mexico--Guatemala Border Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsModernist Art in Ethiopia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEthics and the Visual Arts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Baroque: Pearls and the Nature of Empire, 1492-1700 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Archaeology For You
Sex and Erotism in Ancient Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5America Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilization Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How to Survive in Ancient Greece Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed: Revised and Updated Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Underwater Ghost Towns of North Georgia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHidden History: Lost Civilizations, Secret Knowledge, and Ancient Mysteries Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost King: The Search for Richard III Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Epic of Gilgamesh Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anunnaki Chronicles: A Zecharia Sitchin Reader Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Far Traveler: Voyages of a Viking Woman Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5100 Hieroglyphs: Think Like an Egyptian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Survive in Ancient Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secret History of America: Classic Writings on Our Nation's Unknown Past and Inner Purpose Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lehi and Sariah in Arabia: The Old World Setting of the Book of Mormon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Disinformation Guide to Ancient Aliens, Lost Civilizations, Astonishing Archaeology & Hidden History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lost Colony and Hatteras Island Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Memory Code Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Amazons: Lives and Legends of Warrior Women across the Ancient World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Indian New England Before the Mayflower Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mystery of the Olmecs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Earth Chronicles Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to the Seven Books of The Earth Chronicles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fifty Things You Need to Know About World History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Burying the Dead: An Archaeological History of Burial Grounds, Graveyards & Cemeteries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTalking Taino: Caribbean Natural History from a Native Perspective Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mastodons to Mississippians: Adventures in Nashville's Deep Past Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuried: An alternative history of the first millennium in Britain Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mound Builders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stone Artifacts of Texas Indians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Who Owns Antiquity?
14 ratings4 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cuno argues that current laws and policies regarding archaeological finds are conducive only to nationalism, not education. "What, we wondered, is a national culture in this modern age, when the geographic extent of so many cultures does not coincide with national borders, and when national borders are usually new and artificial creations designating sovereignty over the cultural artifacts of peoples no longer extant or no longer in political power?"
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5James Cuno understands Museums and that's important in a book like this. Ways of thinking about antiquities, value and culture will continually evolve. We may never come to a consensus on ownership and that's what keeps this industry on its toes.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An excellent exploration of the issues dividing the world's great museums and the countries in which great works were taken. What right do museums have to retain treasures obtained illegally or extralegally in previous centuries? What about Egyptian treasures willed to the British Museum by the Turkish leader when Egypt was under his control? And then you get the other side. Many of the treasures would have been destroyed, or have ended up in private collections, owned by people who wouldn't share them with the world. And then you read, theft is theft, and then you read they are world treasures. And by the end the whole topic is one gigantic collection of grey shades. Absolutely NOT cut and dried. And for that thought provoking roller coaster, I am very grateful to the author.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5While still conspicuously ignorant of the subjects, museum acquisitions, museology in general, and the debates concerning (re)appropriation of “culturally significant objects” all fascinate me. James Cuno manages to cover all these bases in this book whose major question is: Do modern states have the right to demand the return of objects that may be deemed to have cultural, aesthetic, or national value? And if they do, what reasons validate this demand? Cuno’s short answer is that states don’t have this right at all. Instead, he sees the rise of these cultural reappropriation laws as a way of shoring up nationalist pretentions. His argument seems strong. Two of his chapters, “The Turkish Question” and “The Chinese Question,” examine this assertion in detail. For example, when the Ba’athists took control in Iraq in 1968, they adopted strict laws of cultural appropriation in concert with their virulently nationalist rhetoric. “Their intention was to create a ‘national-territorial consciousness resting upon the particular history of Iraq and, equally significantly, of what the regime, or a powerful circle within it, presented as the history of the Iraqi people.’ Central to this effort was an official drive to foster archaeology as a way of making people aware and proud of ‘their ancient past,’ including that of the pre-Islamic era. At the same time, the Party encouraged local folklore for the purpose of inspiring communities with a sense of internal Iraqi unity, and emphasizing Iraq’s uniqueness among the nations of the world at large” (p. 58-59). In other words, at least on the level of political propaganda, the purpose of these new laws was not to maintain and preserve ancient artifacts, but rather a proxy for a relatively new country to build a sense of cultural and national identity. Much the same thing happened to the young Turkey while trying to survive the birth pangs of early Ataturkism and subsequent westernization. “The emergence and the development of archaeology in Turkey took place under constraints that are deeply rooted in history. Confrontation between the traditional Islamic framework and the Western model, the endeavor to survive as a non-Arabic nation in the Middle East while the empire was disintegrating, the hostile and occasionally humiliating attitude of Europeans, and growing nationalism have all been consequential in this development … The pace that archaeology took in Turkey is much more related to the ideology of the modern Republic than to the existing archaeological potential of the country” (p. 83, a direct quote from Mehmet Ozdogan’s article “Ideology and Archaeology in Turkey”). In a similar way, the Elgin Marbles served as political symbols critical to the identity and “national spirit” of the modern nation-state of Greece, not just as archaeological artifacts. The claim to national identity is also a common one, and one that Cuno rejects with equal fervor. We are so used to the argument that this object or that belongs here or there because of the important part it plays in making a people who they are. However, these objects are often so removed in historical time that the number of things these artists shared with the supporters of cultural appropriation shared is vanishingly small. Look at contemporary Egyptians. They share neither a common language, a body of customs, a religion, or law with ancient Egyptians, yet we are still urged to believe that one is an integral part of the identity of the other – presumably because of geographical proximity. That dynamic thing we call culture has worked over dozens of centuries to produce these widely divergent changes. The claims of contemporary Egyptians on the cultural artifacts of ancient Egypt seem tenuous at best. The ever-presence of boundary-crossing and the impermanence of cartography both speak to the capriciousness that is “cultural identity.”Cuno argues for what he calls “partage,” the provision of archaeological and historical expertise in return for the partitioning of important discovered objects. One of the only other alternatives would be to potentially let these objects onto the black market, where they would certainly lack the curatorial and historical expertise they would be afforded in a museum. While Cuno effectively cottons on to an important lesson of the last few centuries – that the modern nation-state will stop at nothing to traduce any obstacle that gets in the way of imparting its influence - he does go out of his way to paint many of these states as heterogeneous and uniform in their power, which is misleading at best. Not all nascent nations practiced nationalism, either on an ideological or pragmatic level, with equal vim and vigor. As convincing as Cuno’s arguments were, I often found myself reversing the cultural tables and asking myself what I would do if, for whatever counterfactual historical reason, an original copy of the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution had found its way into the halls of the Kremlin or the Forbidden City. Could Americans who argue against cultural reappropriation laws have the intellectual courage to say, with a straight face, that it doesn’t matter that these objects are not permanently housed in the United States? Then again, we’re much closer in historical time – in language, heritage, culture, and mores – to the people that created this country than the contemporary Chinese are to Shang-era potters or the contemporary Greeks are to those brilliant artisans who created the Elgin Marbles, which may further complicate an already intricate argument. Whatever your opinion on the issues, provided you had one prior to exposure to this book, it will make you re-think how art, identity, cultural appropriation, and museum-building are all intimately connected. It does a wonderful job at raising intelligent questions about how these concepts are linked.