Draw!: The Art of the Half-Point in Chess
By Leonid Verkhovsky and Mikhail Tal
3/5
()
About this ebook
Related to Draw!
Related ebooks
Alexander Alekhine: Fourth World Chess Champion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Topalov Kramnik 2006 World Chess Championship: On the Edge in Elista Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5My Best Games of Chess: 1908-1937 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Emanuel Lasker: Second World Chess Champion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Zurich 1953: 15 Contenders for the World Chess Championship Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The King: Chess Pieces Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Paul Morphy and the Evolution of Chess Theory Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Life & Games of Vasily Smyslov: Volume 1: The Early Years 1921-1948 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Longest Game: The Five Kasparov/Karpov Matches for the World Chess Championship Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDevoted to Chess: The Creative Heritage of Yuri Razuvaev Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Modern Ideas in Chess Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Attacking with g2 - g4: The Modern Way to Get the Upper Hand in Chess Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Risk & Bluff in Chess: The Art of Taking Calculated Risks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Attacking the Strongpoint: The Philosophy of Chess Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTimman's Triumphs: My 100 Best Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDanish Dynamite: Explosive Gambits: the Danish, Göring, Scotch and Urusov Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Endgame Magic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Best Games of Chess 1905-1954 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Botvinnik: 100 Selected Games Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Marshall's Best Games of Chess Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gelfand-Anand 2012: Match for the World Chess Championship Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLondon 1922 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Human Comedy of Chess: A Grandmaster's Chronicles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Strike Like Judit!: The Winning Tactics of Chess Legend Judit Polgar Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tactics In the chess Opening 4: Queen's Gambits, Trompowsky & Torre Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Chess Combination Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Catastrophes & Tactics in the Chess Opening - Vol 5 - Anti-Sicilians: Winning Quickly at Chess Series, #5 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why You Lose at Chess Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Modern Guide to Checkmating Patterns: Improve Your Ability to Spot Typical Mates Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Chess Board Options: A Memoir of Players, Games and Engines Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Games & Activities For You
How to Draw Anything Anytime: A Beginner's Guide to Cute and Easy Doodles (Over 1,000 Illustrations) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5101 Fun Personality Quizzes: Who Are You . . . Really?! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quiz Master: 10,000 general knowledge questions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51001 Chess Exercises for Beginners: The Tactics Workbook that Explains the Basic Concepts, Too Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kokology 2: More of the Game of Self-Discovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best F*cking Activity Book Ever: Irreverent (and Slightly Vulgar) Activities for Adults Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Chess: Chess Masterclass Guide to Chess Tactics, Chess Openings & Chess Strategies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5All the Light We Cannot See: A Novel by Anthony Doerr | Conversation Starters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everything Lateral Thinking Puzzles Book: Hundreds of Puzzles to Help You Think Outside the Box Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBored Games: 100+ In-Person and Online Games to Keep Everyone Entertained Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Monsters Know What They're Doing: Combat Tactics for Dungeon Masters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How To Beat Anyone At Chess: The Best Chess Tips, Moves, and Tactics to Checkmate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stuff You Should Know: An Incomplete Compendium of Mostly Interesting Things Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Big Book of Nature Activities: A Year-Round Guide to Outdoor Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Serial Killer Trivia: Fascinating Facts and Disturbing Details That Will Freak You the F*ck Out Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/530 Interactive Brainteasers to Warm Up your Brain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStar Wars: Book of Lists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Kill a Mockingbird: A Novel by Harper Lee (Trivia-On-Books) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Chess Openings: Traps And Zaps Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everyone's First Chess Workbook: Fundamental Tactics and Checkmates for Improvers – 738 Practical Exercises Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Card Games: The Complete Rules to the Classics, Family Favorites, and Forgotten Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption by Laura Hillenbrand (Trivia-On-Books) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarry Potter - The Complete Quiz Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Nightingale: A Novel by Kristin Hannah | Conversation Starters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Embrace Your Weird: Face Your Fears and Unleash Creativity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Into the Dungeon: A Choose-Your-Own-Path Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Best Bar Trivia Book Ever: All You Need for Pub Quiz Domination Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Draw!
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Draw! - Leonid Verkhovsky
1972
Introduction
There are very many positions that cannot be actually won even if both chessplayers follow the right course. The most elementary example is when both kings are alone on the chessboard. The initial position, with each side having 16 pieces and pawns, does not guarantee success to either side. We never know if both players want, as they say, to spill blood, and in many cases the game is likely to end up drawn. The history of chess competitions often reveals that sad truth.
(1) Walbrodt – Tarrasch
Dresden 1892
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e×d5 e×d5 4.Nf3 Bd6 5.Bd3 Nf6 6.0–0 0–0 7.c3 c6 8.Bg5 Bg4 9.Nbd2 Nbd7 10.Qc2 Qc7 ½-½
Draw?! To tell the truth, two years after this draw,
the same game between Marco and Berger was played in Leipzig, but the draw was agreed upon after another three moves: 11.Rae1 Rae8 12.Bh4 Bh5 13.Bg3 Bg6. Characterizing such masterpieces,
Mikhail Chigorin noted with bitter irony: Great games! Chessplayers travel very far from their countries to
dazzle the chess world with this extraordinary art!
Only a year later after Chigorin’s death, in his memorial tournament, the following game was played:
(2) Rotlewi – Eljaschoff
St.Petersburg 1909
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bb5 Bb4 5.0-0 0-0 6.d3 d6 7.B×c6 B×c3 8.B×b7 B×b2 9.B×a8 B×a1 10.Bg5 Bg4 11.Q×a1 Q×a8 12.B×f6 (D)
12.B×f3 13.B×g7
White can win after 13.B×e5 B×e4 14.B×g7 B×g2 15.B×f8.
13…B×g2 14.B×f8 B×f1 15.Q×f1 Q×f8 16.Qg2+ Qg7 ½-½
Fearing to break off the symmetry, the players agreed to a draw here. But if the players are all out for blood, then sucha game cannot satisfy anyone. (D)
(3) Hamppe – Meitner
Vienna 1873
This game, played almost 140 years ago, is a silent reproach to those who make short draws today.
1.e4 e5 2.Cc3 Bc5 3.Ca4
White has violated the basic principle of development in chess, so Black carries out a bishop sacrifice. Nowadays theory recommends 3.Nf3 d6 4.d4 e×d4 5.N×d4 Nc6 6.Be3 N×d4 7.B×d4 B×d4 8.Q×d4 Nf6 9.0–0–0 with a slight edge for White.
3…B×f2+
This is typical 19th century chess!
4.K×f2 Qh4+ 5.Ke3
Stronger is 5.g3 Q×e4 6.Nf3 Q×a4 7.Bh3.
5…Qf4+ 6.Kd3 d5 7.Kc3 Q×e4 8.Kb3 Na6 9.a3 (D)
It seems that White’s king will find shelter on a2 (after 10.Cc3). But by sacrificing the queen, Black continues the attack.
9…Q×a4+ 10.K×a4 Nc5+ 11.Kb4 a5+!!
This is precise and beautiful!
12.K×c5 Ne7!
Now White’s king is in a mating net. However, he finds magical moves to draw the game.
13.Bb5+ Kd8 14.Bc6 b6+ 15.Kb5 N×c6 16.K×c6 Bb7+ (D)
This is the final touch!; White cannot accept this gift because after 17.K×b7 Kd7 18.Qg4+ Kd6 White is mated.
17.Kb5 Ba6+ 18.Kc6 Bb7+ ½-½
Incidentally, even in those days of yore,
when short, bloodless draws were made, chess organizers declared war on them. Moreover, this was applied not only to short draws, but also to all draws in general; they wanted to uproot draws from tournament practice altogether. But very often such methods were ridiculous. For example, in 1834 in London for the match between MacDonnell and LaBourdonnais, the strongest chessplayers of the time, draws were not counted. At the first international tournaments in London, 1851 and in Paris, 1862, draws were replayed. And at the third tournament in Paris in 1867, draws were considered as losses for both chessplayers! It was only in 1870 in Baden-Baden that draws were granted a half-point.
At the big international tournaments in Monte Carlo in 1901 and 1902, the organizer, Prince Dadian Mingrelia, introduced a special system that was supposed to motivate the chessplayers. In case of a draw, both players received a quarter-point, and they had to play another game between the official rounds. The winner received another half-point, for a total of three-quarters of a point for those two games. The loser received only a quarter-point.
However, if the second game was drawn as well, both players received an additional quarter-point. It is notable that in Monte Carlo in 1902, because of such a peculiar draw
regulation, Pillsbury finished second, a quarter point behind Maróczy, although if the points were counted as they are today, the American master would have been the winner! That tournament was the last in chess history in which quarterpoints were used.
Within a few years, draws were becoming more frequent. In the mid-1890s the chess world became familiar with the name of Carl Schlechter, the young player from Vienna, who was called the king of draws.
Winning against weaker players, he almost invariably drew his games with the strongest players of the era, and his performance in tournaments was impressive. Schlechter’s chess pacifism became proverbial. True, his contemporaries were joking when they said that Schlechter was always willing to make a draw, but in point of fact draws were largely prevalent in his tournament scores. For instance, in Leipzig, 1894 he drew ten out of 17 games. In Hastings in 1895, he drew nine games in the first ten rounds. In Baden, in 1914 and in 1895, he took third prize, having drawn 14 of 18 games, without a single loss.
Most of Schlechter’s matches were also drawn. Something incredible happened in his match with Marco in 1893: all ten games of the match were drawn! In the second match with Marco, the score was also even. Schlechter drew matches with Janowski, Alapin, and Tarrasch. The most dramatic match in Schlechter’s career, with Emanuel Lasker, was also drawn. In ten games the chess giants made eight draws.
It has to be admitted that Schlechter truly deserved the title of the king of draws,
although he was a remarkable chess figure and he left an impressive chess heritage.
Although Schlechter’s draws are part of chess history and chess art, still they were only draws and therefore his influence in the world of chess was considerably reduced, compared with his natural talent and chess strength,
Romanovsky remarked. Many great chess masters of that time followed Schlechter’s chess pragmatism, such as Marco, Teichmann, Tarrasch and others. To quote Rudolf Spielmann, the ‘draw practice’ reached its climax in the era of Capablanca.
At the beginning of the 20th century, draws in major chess tournaments made up about 50% of the games played.
In 1919 Capablanca put forward his theory that the draw would be the death of chess. His reasoning was that the enhanced defensive technique as well as the possibility of finally using up the stock of strategic ideas would lead to the disappearance of chess as a game. He feared that in the years to come, chess openings would be studied to such an extent that the normal result of the game between top-class grandmasters would be a draw. In the long run, that would kill the interest of both the chess professional and the amateur.
To revitalize interest in the game, Capablanca even proposed reforming chess. He published an article that caused an uproar among the greatest masters, such as Lasker, Nimzovitsch, Tarrasch, Alekhine and Tartakower. Opposing Capablanca, they asserted that chess was still very much alive, though formerly the game had become exhausted. The great tournament in New York in 1924 was a serious blow to Capablanca’s theory. To begin with, for the first time in eight years, Capablanca lost a game. Besides, the percentage of draws in this strong tournament was very low: out of 73 games played, only 37 were draws.
But Capablanca still wanted to prove his theory. In 1929 he played a fourgame match on a special board with Maróczy. The board was 16 squares by 12 and each player had two kings, two queens four rooks, etc. In other words, two sets of chess pieces. The rules corresponded to the ordinary chess game except that the pawn could reach any square of the sixth rank. Although each side had two kings, it was very difficult to give a checkmate. Capablanca won three games and lost one. This match showed that such a game should last 100 moves, that is, two or three times longer than in standard chess. In other words, the duration of such a game would be 12-14 hours. It was most unlikely that anyone could enjoy such a game.
There were other proposals concerning the elimination of draws. Lasker and Réti, for example, suggested that a full point should be given for a checkmate, while five-eighth