Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Elementary Wave Optics
    Elementary Wave Optics
    Elementary Wave Optics
    Ebook435 pages3 hours

    Elementary Wave Optics

    By Robert H. Webb

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    This undergraduate textbook presents thorough coverage of the standard topics of classical optics and optical instrument design; it also offers significant details regarding the concepts of modern optics. Its survey of the mathematical tools of optics grants students insights into the physical principles of quantum mechanics.

    Two principal concepts occur throughout: a treatment of scattering from real scatterers (leading to Huygens’ principles, diffraction theory, the index of refraction, and related topics); and the difference between coherent and noncoherent wave phenomena. Examinations of superimposition of field amplitudes and detection of intensities recur throughout the book.

    This highly physical approach is augmented by extensive appendixes of mathematical details. Two sets of problems appear at the end of each chapter and form a crucial part of the exposition. One set consists of well-tested problems with detailed solutions, paired with similar problems without supplied solutions. The other set contains short, easier exercises, filling the more conventional role of end-of-chapter problems.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherDover Publications
    Release dateSep 14, 2012
    ISBN9780486145952
    Elementary Wave Optics
    Author

    Robert H. Webb

    Dr. Robert H. Webb is a hydrologist and Diane E. Boyer is a photo archivist with the U.S. Geological Survey National Research Program in Tucson, Arizona. Dr. Raymond M. Turner is a botanist, now retired from the USGS in Tucson. In 1959, Turner established the Desert Laboratory Repeat Photography Collection, now managed by Webb and Boyer.

    Read more from Robert H. Webb

    Related to Elementary Wave Optics

    Titles in the series (100)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Physics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Dancing To A Galactic Death

      Dec 1, 2022

      Dancing To A Galactic Death
      1 min read

    • Article

      How the Universe Remembers Information

      Feb 28, 2019

      It was one of the great missed connections of physics. In 1965 a particle theorist derived a formula for the collision of elementary particles. Twenty years later two gravitation theorists, using completely different techniques, derived a formula for

      6 min read

    • Article

      Why Mathematicians Should Stop Naming Things After Each Other

      Sep 2, 2020

      Any student of modern math must know what it feels like to drown in a well of telescoping terminology. For a high-profile example, let’s take the Calabi-Yau manifold, made famous by string theory. A Calabi-Yau manifold is a compact, complex Kähler ma

      6 min read

    • Article

      Evil Triumphs in These Multiverses, and God Is Powerless

      Mar 2, 2017

      The challenge that the multiverse poses for the idea of an all-good, all-powerful God is often focused on fine-tuning. If there are infinite universes, then we don’t need a fine tuner to explain why the conditions of our universe are perfect for life

      7 min read

    • Article

      Digital Connection

      May 1, 2020

      Digital Connection
      8 min read

    • Article

      Is The Law Of Conservation Of Energy Cancelled?

      Dec 12, 2019

      Physics is often baffling, but one principle seems rock-solid: the law of conservation of energy. The world contains this thing called “energy” whose amount never changes. It can change its form or go from one body to another, but its total amount re

      6 min read

    • Article

      A Universe Made of Tiny, Random Chunks: The space-time that makes up our universe is inherently uncertain.

      Jun 6, 2013

      One of science’s most crucial yet underappreciated achievements is the description of the physical universe using mathematics—in particular, using continuous, smooth mathematical functions, like how a sine wave describes both light and sound. This is

      6 min read

    • Article

      Propogation

      Sep 1, 2019

      Propogation
      12 min read

    • Article

      What Is The Theory Of Everything?

      Jun 20, 2019

      The theory will have to bring together a lot of different aspects of physics, from Einstein’s general theory of relativity that governs our understanding of the largest structures in the universe to the Standard Model that helps us understand the sma

      2 min read

    • Article

      Will Quantum Mechanics Swallow Relativity?: The contest between gravity and quantum physics takes a new turn.

      Oct 29, 2015

      It is the biggest of problems, it is the smallest of problems. At present physicists have two separate rulebooks explaining how nature works. There is general relativity, which beautifully accounts for gravity and all of the things it dominates: orbi

      17 min read

    • Article

      Will Quantum Mechanics Swallow Relativity?

      Jun 8, 2017

      It is the biggest of problems, it is the smallest of problems. At present physicists have two separate rulebooks explaining how nature works. There is general relativity, which beautifully accounts for gravity and all of the things it dominates: orbi

      17 min read

    • Article

      The End of the Dark Universe?

      Mar 13, 2024

      Please excuse me for being excited, but this hasn’t happened for more than four decades: Physicists have found a new approach to solving a problem which is almost a century old—how to combine quantum physics with gravity. The new idea comes from John

      5 min read

    • Article

      What You’re Doing Right Now Is Proof of Quantum Theory

      Nov 24, 2021

      Nobody understands quantum mechanics,” Richard Feynman famously said. Long after Max Planck’s discovery in 1900 that energy comes in separate packets or quanta, quantum physics remains enigmatic. It is vastly different from how things work at bigger

      8 min read

    • Article

      Q & A WITH A SOLAR SCIENTIST

      Jan 18, 2024

      Q & A WITH A SOLAR SCIENTIST
      2 min read

    • Article

      A Supermassive Lens On The Constants Of Nature

      Nov 25, 2020

      The 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics went to three researchers who confirmed that Einstein’s general relativity predicts black holes, and established that the center of our own galaxy houses a supermassive black hole with the equivalent of 4 million suns

      9 min read

    • Article

      Propagation

      Nov 1, 2019

      Propagation
      15 min read

    • Article

      The Trouble with Theories of Everything: There is no known physics theory that is true at every scale—there may never be.

      Oct 1, 2015

      Whenever you say anything about your daily life, a scale is implied. Try it out. “I’m too busy” only works for an assumed time scale: today, for example, or this week. Not this century or this nanosecond. “Taxes are onerous” only makes sense for a ce

      8 min read

    • Article

      Is The Standard Model Broken?

      Jun 2, 2021

      Is The Standard Model Broken?
      3 min read

    • Article

      The THEORY of EVERYTHING

      Jun 20, 2019

      The THEORY of EVERYTHING
      6 min read

    • Article

      Secrets Of The SYNCHROTRON

      Jan 21, 2021

      Secrets Of The SYNCHROTRON
      8 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Elementary Wave Optics

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Elementary Wave Optics - Robert H. Webb

      Copyright

      Copyright © 1969, 1997 by Robert H. Webb

      All rights reserved.

      Bibliographical Note

      This Dover edition, first published in 2005, is an unabridged republication of the work originally published by Academic Press, New York, in 1969. The reddish brown color found in the figures and diagrams of the original edition has been reproduced here in gray.

      Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

      Webb, Robert H., 1934—

      Elementary wave optics / Robert H. Webb.

      p. cm.

      Originally published: New York : Academic Press, 1969.

      Includes bibliographical references and index.

      9780486145952

      1. Light, Wave theory of. I. Title.

      QC403.W4 2004

      535’.13—dc22

      2004059346

      Manufactured in the United States of America

      Dover Publications, Inc., 31 East 2nd Street, Mineola, N.Y. 11501

      I’m cariad i.

      Yn gyntaf rhaid i fardd ddysgu canu.

      Table of Contents

      Title Page

      Copyright Page

      Preface

      1 - Geometrical optics: summary

      2 - Waves: description

      3 - Superposition: reflection, standing waves, group velocity

      4 - Electromagnetic waves, energy and momentum, doppler effect

      5 - Scattering: index of refraction

      6 - Polarized light

      7 - Interference

      8 - Interference from two sources

      9 - Interference from many sources

      10 - Multiple images: Interference of light from an extended source

      11 - Diffraction

      12 - Modern optics

      Appendix A: - Miscellaneous mathematical notes

      Appendix B: - Derivation of the wave equation

      Appendix C: - String

      Appendix D: - Summary on electricity and magnetism—derivation of electromagnetic wave equation

      Appendix E: - Resonance

      Appendix F: - Index of refraction—macroscopic approach

      Appendix G: - Fresnel diffraction

      Appendix H: - Fourier transforms

      Bibliography

      Solutions to selected problems

      Index

      Preface

      Wave optics is the study of the various phenomena associated with the wave properties of light—and by extension, with any waves. A knowledge of this subject is necessary for an understanding of optical devices, but more important, a study of wave optics provides a way to introduce many of the phenomena of modern quantum physics. The feature which distinguishes modern physics from classical physics is the occurrence of wave (interference) effects in the interactions of all kinds of matter and energy. This book is designed to explain these phenomena in terms of electromagnetic waves (including visible light) and of other wave systems closer to common experience. Extensively described are superposition, scattering, and the concept of coherence. Coherent optics (so-called modern optics) has newly become accessible to experimentation, and the approach to modern physics which is emphasized here permits the treatment of this subject in some detail.

      In order to maintain the thread of the argument, the main part of the text uses as little formal mathematics as possible. For more advanced students, the appendices will supply the missing derivations, after the subject has been introduced in the text.

      Problems are an integral part of this text. Detailed solutions are given to half of them, so that the student can use solved problems as a learning device. Self-restraint in looking up the solution is important, since the value of a problem lies in trying to solve it and in understanding its difficulties. Subsequent use of the solution then makes pedagogic sense. The unsolved problems are roughly paired with the solved ones in most cases. Short exercises of a more conventional sort are also included.

      I am grateful for the many contributions of problems, criticisms, and insights from my colleagues in the courses which generated this book. Professors R. F. Walker, J. T. Tessman, and A. E. Everett, in particular, will recognize their efforts—I hope faithfully included. Finally, and in dedication, this is for my most important luminary—Charme.

      ROBERT H. WEBB

      Lexington, Massachusetts

      1

      Geometrical optics: summary

      Geometrical optics deals with light (and more generally with waves) in situations where it is possible to ignore the wave character of the phenomenon. This usually means that the wavelengths involved are very much smaller than the dimensions of anything with which the waves interact. Later we will see that geometrical optics is a limiting case of wave optics. The usual value in limiting cases is their simplicity, and geometrical optics shares this asset, with reservations.

      All of geometrical optics may be deduced from three simple empirical rules:

      1. Light travels in straight lines in homogeneous media.

      2. The angle at which light is reflected from a surface is equal to the angle at which it is incident.

      3. When light passes from one medium to another, its path is described by the equation n1 sin θ1 = n2 sin θ2.

      Figure 1.1 summarizes these rules and defines the various angles. A ray is a line along the path the light follows. We think of this as a very narrow beam of light.

      Figure 1.1: Reflection and refraction.

      We may regard rule 3, which describes refraction, as defining the relative index of refraction: n2/n1.

      If we follow custom and define the index of vacuum to be nvac = 1, then n1 and n2 are the indices of each medium relative to vacuum, and are so listed in handbooks. Later we will see that this ability to characterize each medium by a single number is extremely important. Among other consequences, it will lead us to regard nk as the ratio of the speed of light in vacuum (c) to (ck), the speed of light in medium k: nk = c/ck . This in turn allows us to deduce the three rules from the more general Fermat’s principle. The main asset of this principle is the esthetic one of unification. It is not essential to the conclusions of geometrical optics, although occasional simplifications are possible. But the three rules suffice.

      A further statement limits the kinds of media usually considered. This is the reciprocity principle, which requires that if light can follow a certain path from A to B, then it can follow the same path from B to A. Some media do not support this principle, but they seldom occur in questions pertaining to geometrical optics.

      If we apply our rules directly to plane surfaces, they describe the behavior of mirrors and prisms (1.1—1.3)¹. Rule 3 also predicts the phenomenon of total internal reflection. When light passes from a medium with a larger index to one with a smaller index (as, for instance, from glass to air), the ray is bent toward the surface. That is, θ2 > θ1. Eventually, the ray emerging from the denser medium (the one with larger index) lies parallel to the surface. This occurs at the critical angle: n1 sin θc = n2 sin(90°) = n2. If θ1 is bigger than θc, no light emerges. In this case, all incident light is contained in the reflected ray so that, from inside, the surface appears to be a perfect mirror. Such mirrors are important in various optical instruments. Familiar examples are the right-angle prisms in binoculars and the light pipes which illumine hard-to-reach places.

      Figure 1.2: Total internal reflection.

      Figure 1.3: Applications of total internal reflection.

      Notice that all light incident from the outside of a totally reflecting surface will enter the surface, but it will not reach the region for which θ1 > θc. (1.4)

      In applying rule 3, we find a new empirical fact: n is different for different colors of light. Later we will study the source of this dispersion in some detail, but in geometrical optics we merely use it, for example, when we separate colors with a prism. Or, we may compensate for it, as in making achromatic lenses of two kinds of glass, in which the dispersion of one compensates for that of the other. (1.5)

      Rule 2 for reflection governs the behavior of instruments with curved mirrors, such as the astronomical telescope. Since the manipulation is similar to that of lenses, we can summarize the operations of the two devices together.

      A converging lens is a device which brings parallel light to a single point, called the focus. Parallel light means a beam in which any one ray is parallel to any other in the beam. Such light comes from a source so distant that the divergence of two adjacent rays is imperceptible, or (by the reciprocity principle) it comes from a source at the focal point of a converging lens. The three rules of geometrical optics tell us how to construct a real lens, but we will generally deal with existing ones, deferring consideration of their construction until needed. So, using the definition of a converging lens alone, and assuming an ideal lens, we can find how images are formed.

      Without derivation, we present the thin-lens equation:

      This refers to a lens thin enough to have its focal points at equal distances on each side. Practically, the equation works only for rays nearly parallel to the axis of a real lens.

      Figure 1.4: Thin-lens parameters.

      Figure 1.4 defines the parameters. Notice that the way to find the image graphically is to follow two of the rays diverging from an off-axis point on the object. The one going through the center of the lens is undeflected. (This follows from rule 3, in the approximation of the thin lens, which has two close, parallel surfaces at its center.) The ray parallel to the axis must go, by definition, through the far focal point. The ray going through the near focal point becomes parallel to the axis. Two of these three rays are enough. In the situation illustrated, the rays actually come together again, and a real image (one which can be cast on a screen) is formed. Subsequently, the rays diverge from a real image just as they do from a real object. The size of the image may be inferred immediately from the geometry. The magnification M is defined by the equation:

      (The negative sign indicates that the image is inverted.) M is called the linear magnification.

      If the rays never do meet again, they will appear (by rule 1) to come from a virtual image, as shown in Figure 1.5.

      Figure 1.5: Virtual images.

      The lens in Figure 1.5(b) is a diverging lens, which makes parallel light diverge as if it came from a point. We can describe all thin lenses and all situations by the same equation if we adopt a few conventions to clarify the way in which the equation is used:

      1. If the incident light comes from the OBJECT, we say it is a real object, and define the distance from the lens to it as positive. Otherwise, it is virtual, and its distance is negative.

      2. If the emergent light goes toward the IMAGE, we say it is a real image, and define the distance from the lens to it as positive.

      3. The FOCAL LENGTH is positive for a converging lens or a concave mirror and negative for a diverging lens or a convex mirror.

      Figure 1.6: Image formation, two lenses.

      The following exercise illustrates these conventions: In Figure 1.6, A is a real object for the converging lens C. B is the consequent real image, or would be if the diverging lens D did not intervene. B is also a virtual object for lens D, and E is the consequent real image. Some numerical values might be: f1 = + 5 cm; f2 = −10 cm; p1 = + 7 cm; YA = + 1 cm; and L = 12.5 cm.

      First find q1, the position of B:

      Its size is

      Since the object distance for the lens D is the difference between q1 and L we find p2 = −5 cm, with the negative sign indicating that it is on the side of D to which the light goes. Again we apply our equation and find that

      The object size is

      Mirrors also obey the thin-lens equation, and the conventions apply in the same way. (1.6−1.10)

      So far we have said nothing about the actual surfaces from which lenses and mirrors are made, nor have we provided for lenses of finite thickness. In fact, the ideal surfaces are seldom available for lenses and are often unnecessary for mirrors. The ideal surface for a lens is a very complicated curve, derivable from our rules but difficult to fabricate. That for a mirror is the simpler ellipsoid. Since a spherical surface is easiest to make, lenses (and sometimes mirrors) usually have this form.

      A spherical mirror has a focal length equal to one-half the radius of curvature. Using this value, it is easy to see that only rays near the axis will be focused sharply.

      For a single spherical refracting surface, the following equation holds:

      where ninc is the index on the side from which the light is incident, nem is that on the side into which the light emerges, and R (the radius of curvature of the surface) is positive if the center of curvature is on the side toward which the light goes. For example, in Figure 1.7 an object at A yields an image at B according to

      or an object at B yields an image at A:

      Figure 1.7: Single, spherical-surface parameters.

      As with lenses, we apply our equation to each surface in turn, ignoring the others. (1.11−1.12)

      Keep in mind that this summary is for the simplest of applications of geometrical optics, although its assumptions are sufficient for an understanding of that subject. This explanation should enable you to use reference texts, such as Jenkins and White (see Bibliography), and help you to understand real (for example, thick) lenses, but you must expect to labor diligently to apply such knowledge. Applied geometrical optics as practiced today is one of the most complicated subjects ever derived from three simple rules.

      EXERCISES

      1. If a 6-ft man can just see from his feet to the top of his head in a mirror, how tall is the mirror?

      2. A prism has a small peak angle, α, and is made of glass with index n. Through what angle will it bend a light beam?

      3. Find the size and position of the sun’s image due to a lens of focal length +50 cm. (The sun subtends an angle of about 0.5 degree.)

      4. Find the size and position of the moon’s image due to a lens of focal length −50cm.

      5. Use the equation for the image formed by a single spherical surface to find the apparent depth of a penny which is actually under 10 cm of water.

      PROBLEMS

      These problems are intended to supplement, as well as illustrate, the material covered above. Relevant sections of the text are followed by problem numbers in parentheses. Solutions are given for selected problems at the end of the book.

      1.1 Three mirrors are set at right angles to each other to form a corner reflector. If a light is shone into this system, where does the beam go?

      1.2 Where does the light ray in the figure hit the screen? Suppose that at each interface one-half the light intensity goes into the reflected ray and one-half into the refracted (transmitted) ray. Find the second brightest spot on the screen.

      1.3 A fish watcher looks at an aquarium from a point on a line diagonally through it. For a fish on this line of sight, 5 cm from the corner, how many images does the watcher see, and what are their locations. Does the fish appear different in the different images? What does the fish see?

      1.4 A skin diver shines his flashlight at the surface on the water so that the beam makes an angle of 60 degrees with the vertical.

      (a) Where does the beam go? Assume that there is no reflected beam if there is a transmitted one.

      (b) Oil of index 1.2 is now spread on the water. Where does the beam go?

      (c) Many layers of oil are spread on the water, as shown. Sketch the path.

      (d) The air over a blacktop road is hottest near the road surface. The index of air far from the surface is 1.0003. An observer sees the road surface only if he looks down at an angle of 89 degrees or less. What is the index of air at the surface?

      1.5 The index of the glass used to make a prism is 1.55 for red light and 1.65 for blue. Design an arrangement whereby only red light emerges from the prism. Take the index of air to be 1.00. Hint: Let the beam enter perpendicularly to a surface.

      1.6 Find and describe the image in the following lens combinations:

      (a) Simple magnifier:

      Yobj = 1 mm, p = 5 cm, f = 6 cm.

      (b) Compound microscope:

      Yobj = 0.01 mm, p1 = 1.1 cm,

      f1 = 1 cm, f2 = 10 cm, L = 18 cm.

      Does the image appear bigger or smaller? Hint: Keep at least the

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1