Ebook199 pages5 hours
Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan
By J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
()
About this ebook
The role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election raised questions in the minds of many Americans about the relationships between judges and political influence; the following years saw equally heated debates over the appropriate role of political ideology in selecting federal judges. Legal scholars have always debated these questions—asking, in effect, how much judicial systems operate on merit and principle and how much they are shaped by politics.
The Japanese Constitution, like many others, requires that all judges be "independent in the exercise of their conscience and bound only by this Constitution and its laws." Consistent with this requirement, Japanese courts have long enjoyed a reputation for vigilant independence—an idea challenged only occasionally, and most often anecdotally. But in this book, J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen use the latest statistical techniques to examine whether that reputation always holds up to scrutiny—whether, and to what extent, the careers of lower court judges can be manipulated to political advantage.
On the basis of careful econometric analysis of career data for hundreds of judges, Ramseyer and Rasmusen find that Japanese politics do influence judicial careers, discreetly and indirectly: judges who decide politically charged cases in ways favored by the ruling party enjoy better careers after their decisions than might otherwise be expected, while dissenting judges are more likely to find their careers hampered by assignments to less desirable positions.
Ramseyer and Rasmusen's sophisticated yet accessible analysis has much to offer anyone interested in either judicial independence or the application of econometric techniques in the social sciences.
The Japanese Constitution, like many others, requires that all judges be "independent in the exercise of their conscience and bound only by this Constitution and its laws." Consistent with this requirement, Japanese courts have long enjoyed a reputation for vigilant independence—an idea challenged only occasionally, and most often anecdotally. But in this book, J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen use the latest statistical techniques to examine whether that reputation always holds up to scrutiny—whether, and to what extent, the careers of lower court judges can be manipulated to political advantage.
On the basis of careful econometric analysis of career data for hundreds of judges, Ramseyer and Rasmusen find that Japanese politics do influence judicial careers, discreetly and indirectly: judges who decide politically charged cases in ways favored by the ruling party enjoy better careers after their decisions than might otherwise be expected, while dissenting judges are more likely to find their careers hampered by assignments to less desirable positions.
Ramseyer and Rasmusen's sophisticated yet accessible analysis has much to offer anyone interested in either judicial independence or the application of econometric techniques in the social sciences.
Read more from J. Mark Ramseyer
Second-Best Justice: The Virtues of Japanese Private Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fable of the Keiretsu: Urban Legends of the Japanese Economy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Comfort Women Hoax: A Fake Memoir, North Korean Spies, and Hit Squads in the Academic Swamp Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Measuring Judicial Independence
Related ebooks
The Federalist Society: How Conservatives Took the Law Back from Liberals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond High Courts: The Justice Complex in Latin America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThis Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConflict for Space: A Focus on Identity Duality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarmful Thoughts: Essays on Law, Self, and Morality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Rights and Foreign Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEdward S. Corwin's Constitution and What It Means Today: 1978 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrial and the Art of Sailing: A Guidebook for New (and Not So New) Attorneys to Navigate Trial Advocacy, and Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw and the "Sharing Economy": Regulating Online Market Platforms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDo the Poor Count?: Democratic Institutions and Accountability in a Context of Poverty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Ideology: Human, #18 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivic Talk: Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Philosophical Theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Religicide: Confronting the Roots of Anti-Religious Violence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: The Evolution of the Caste System in Early India Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Weaver's Lost Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Discord: Values and Power in a Fractured World Order Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivil Collaborative Law: The Road Less Travelled Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresenting Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Modest Proposal and Other Satires Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Democratic Conception of Privacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Economic Analysis of Crime and Justice: Theory, Methods, and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Exceptionalism and Human Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAffirmative Action and the Meanings of Merit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Jurisprudence For You
The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Yale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 7 - May 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotarial Practice & Malpractice in the Philippines: Rules, Jurisprudence, & Comments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Case of George Pell: reckoning with child sexual abuse by clergy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNatural Law Jurisprudence in U.S. Supreme Court Cases since Roe v. Wade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBodies of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Causes of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Theory of the Trial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of Some of the Hardest Decisions They’ve Ever Made Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeeking Justice: The Radical Compassion of Jesus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReligious Liberty in Crisis: Exercising Your Faith in an Age of Uncertainty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF PLATFORM MARKETS: Why the Supreme Court Got It Right in American Express Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBacklash: Libel, Impeachment, and Populism in the Reign of Queen Anne Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLegal Literacy: An Introduction to Legal Studies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Introduction to The International Court of Justice - Icj- Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFictions, Lies, and the Authority of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 6 - April 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConfident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Yale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 4 - January-February 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 2 - November 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 81, Number 3 - Summer 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 2 - December 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 81, Number 4 - Fall 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 6 - April 2014 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Exploring Wild Law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Measuring Judicial Independence
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Measuring Judicial Independence - J. Mark Ramseyer
Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1