Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945
The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945
The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945
Ebook124 pages2 hours

The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Physics is the science that deals with the properties and interrelationship of matter and energy. It studies mechanics, heat, light, sound, electricity, magnetism, radiation, and atomic structure. This tale stretches from 2000 BCE to 1945 and introduces the reader to the brilliant men and women from Thales of Miletos to Albert Einstein who working alone or collaboratively made it all possible.
LanguageEnglish
PublishereBookIt.com
Release dateApr 26, 2016
ISBN9781456607432
The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945

Read more from Sheldon Cohen

Related to The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945

Related ebooks

Physics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    The History of Physics from 2000BCE to 1945 - Sheldon Cohen

    century.

    WHAT IS LIGHT?

    The Greeks were also responsible for the first enlightened discussion on the subject of light. Prior to their serious evaluation of this phenomenon, the world was content to accept God’s pronouncement: Let there be light: and there was light. Light was the antithesis of dark. Because of it, all life on earth was given the gift of sight.

    What was it that caused our eyes to perceive the world around us when the sun or the moon or fire allowed us to see? What did our eyes do that allowed us to visualize distant objects? Did our eyes emit something that sped rapidly to a distant or nearby object, and once having struck the object caused us to see it, or did light issue forth from any luminous object and reach our eyes, and having done so give us a visible world? Pythagoras (582-500BCE) championed this latter thought.

    These conflicting theories only served to raise many more questions. If light entered our eyes enabling us to see, or if something left our eyes giving us the same ability, what is it that entered or left? What is its size? What does it weigh? Very little, no doubt, if it has weight at all? What is its speed? Why does it pass through some objects and not others? Why does cloth block light and thick glass allow it to pass through?

    These questions would remain unanswered for centuries, and the solution would be intimately connected with the development of the atom theory that the Greeks so brilliantly propounded.

    THERE ARE ATOMS AFTER ALL

    The first to experimentally open the door to confirming the atomos theory was Robert Boyle (1627-1691). He was born in Ireland. His father was the richest man in the British Isles. Boyle, to his credit, took advantage of the opportunities that money opened up for him. He became a renaissance man, studying religion, philosophy, mathematics, languages, and the physics of such pioneers as Descartes and Galileo.

    His natural philosophic work included an improved vacuum pump that allowed him to make excellent vacuums, and in so doing he demonstrated that air was necessary to sustain life, that sound would disappear in a vacuum, and a candle would stop burning as the air was evacuated.

    His main triumph, so familiar to all students of chemistry, was the volume-pressure inverse relationship. Boyle used a J shaped glass tube closed at the shorter end and opened at the long end. When he poured mercury in the tube, air trapped in the closed short end. The more mercury he poured in the less air seemed to be trapped. He made many measurements at atmospheric pressure and also at lower and higher then atmospheric pressure. He determined that when the pressure on the air was increased by the addition of more mercury, the volume of the air decreased, and when the pressure on the air was decreased the volume of air increased.

    This was the pressure-volume inverse relationship and it lent credence to the atomistic theory: if air is made up of widely separated atoms, suggested by Democritus, this would explain the fact that air was lighter then solids, where the atoms were closer together. Placing the atoms of air under pressure would push the atoms closer together, thus decreasing the volume of the air.

    It all made sense under the atomistic theory. Others could easily reproduce Boyle’s experiments, and the concept of atoms gained the upper hand, finally vindicating the Greek philosophers.

    ATOMS ELEMENTS COMPOUNDS

    Boyle’s work also laid the foundation for ending the concept of air, fire, earth, and water as the basic four elements. Boyle said speculation as to the basic elements served no purpose and an element was anything that could not be broken down further by chemical manipulation. Chemists then started on the trail of elements and eventually it was determined that gases, such as oxygen and nitrogen were elements, and iron, copper, gold, silver, and the mercury used in Boyle’s experiments were elements.

    This led to the definition of a compound (latin meaning put together), which was any substance put together by a combination of elements.

    Joseph Louis Proust (1754-1826) was born in France and trained as a pharmacist. He taught and did research in Spain for twenty years. Napoleon’s invasion of Spain forced him back to France where he did his most important work.

    Chemists of the time were trying to determine the proportion of elements within each compound. The French chemist Claude Berthollet (1748-1822) stated that the compounds could vary in composition depending upon the amount and proportion of the reactants used in the formation of the compounds.

    Proust experimented with copper carbonate and separated it into copper, carbon, and oxygen in a ratio of five to one to four. No matter how he did the experiment this was the result. If he added more of one of the elements in a greater proportion then there ordinarily would be in the compound, he founded some of the element left over. He found the same thing to be true for other compounds he worked with. They always had a fixed amount of elements in a definite proportion. He named this the law of definite proportions, and other chemists confirmed his work. Berthollet eventually had to admit that his concept was wrong and Proust’s was right.

    Proust’s work supported the concept of the indivisibility of atoms.

    John Dalton (1766-1844) was an English chemist who worked with gases and discovered that different gases could have different proportions of the same elements. For instance: the substance carbon monoxide had one part carbon and one part oxygen, while the compound carbon dioxide had one part carbon and two parts oxygen. (mon is a Greek word for one and di is a Greek word for two). He called this the law of multiple proportions, although each compound followed the law of definite proportions. He agreed that all chemical elements were composed of atoms, and each atom of an element had the same mass, whereas different elements had different atomic masses, and it was these masses that differentiated one element from another. Dalton also said that atoms combine with each other in whole number ratios. As example 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:4, etc. Since atoms were indivisible, it was impossible for a fraction of an atom to combine to form a

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1