Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Pre-Emption and Precedent: The Significance of Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) for an Israeli Response to an Iranian Nuclear Threat - Osirak Reactor, Covert Actions, Air Strike, IAEA, U.S. Relations
Unavailable
Pre-Emption and Precedent: The Significance of Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) for an Israeli Response to an Iranian Nuclear Threat - Osirak Reactor, Covert Actions, Air Strike, IAEA, U.S. Relations
Unavailable
Pre-Emption and Precedent: The Significance of Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) for an Israeli Response to an Iranian Nuclear Threat - Osirak Reactor, Covert Actions, Air Strike, IAEA, U.S. Relations
Ebook170 pages2 hours

Pre-Emption and Precedent: The Significance of Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) for an Israeli Response to an Iranian Nuclear Threat - Osirak Reactor, Covert Actions, Air Strike, IAEA, U.S. Relations

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. In 1981, Israel conducted a pre-emptive strike on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor. Then Israel bombed a Syrian nuclear reactor at al-Kibar in 2007. Today, Israel is facing a new challenge as it considers Iran's nuclear program. This thesis is a comparative case study analyzing how Israel utilized its instruments of national power to deal with the threats in Iraq and Syria and how the international community responded after Israel destroyed their nuclear reactors. After determining the similarities and differences between cases, this thesis draws implications for Israel's ongoing efforts to deal with Iran's nuclear program. This study is significant because it is the first comparative case study to analyze Israel's experiences dealing with Iraq and Syria's nuclear programs. The findings of this study offer insight to US strategic planners as they consider strategies and timelines for dealing with Tehran's nuclear program, recognizing that Israel is willing to act unilaterally as historical events attest. The findings will assist US decision makers as they formulate policy concerning Iran, Israel, and the uncertain road ahead.

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION * Background * Research Questions * Assumptions * Definitions * Scope of Study * Limitations * Delimitations * Structure and Significance of Study * CHAPTER 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW * Iraq * Syria * Iran * Theory * Summary * CHAPTER 3 - RESEARCH DESIGN * CHAPTER 4 - ANALYSIS * Israel's Use of its Instruments of National Power to Deal with Iraq's Nuclear Program * Diplomatic * Information * Military (Covert Action and Air Strike) * Economic * International Responses to Israel's 1981 Attack on Iraq's Osirak Nuclear Reactor * Iraq * Arab Nations * United Nations * France * Britain * United States * Others * Israel's Use of its Instruments of National Power to Deal with Syria's Nuclear Program * Diplomatic * Information * Military (Covert Action and Air Strike) * Economic * International Responses to Israel's 2007 Attack on Syria's Nuclear Reactor * Syria * North Korea * Turkey * United Nations * Arab Nations * United States * Cross-Case Synthesis (Iraq and Syria) * Findings: Israel's Use of Its Instruments of National Power * Timeframe * Diplomatic * Information and Economic * Israeli Perception of an Existential Threat * Willingness to Act Unilaterally * Israel's Perception of the IAEA * Extensive Use of Covert Action * Air Strikes * Findings: International Responses to Israeli Attacks * Lack of Military Response by Targeted Nation * Insignificant Economic Responses * Arab Response * US-Israeli Relations * UN Response * Targeting of Israel's Nuclear Program * Implications of Case Findings for Israel's Dealings with Iran's Nuclear Program * Current Israeli Use of Its Instruments of National Power to Deal with Iran's Nuclear Program * Israeli Perception of an Existential Threat * Diplomatic and Economic * Willingness to Act Unilaterally * Extensive Use of Covert Action * Timeframe * Israel's Perception of the IAEA * Air Strike. * Likely International Responses to an Israeli Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities * Lack of Military Response by Targeted Nation * Insignificant Economic Response * Arab Response * US-Israeli Relations * UN Response and Targeting of Israel's Nuclear Program * CHAPTER 5 - CONCLUSION * Major Discoveries of Case Study * Significance of Studies Findings * Suggestions for Further Research * BIBLIOGRAPHY

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 5, 2016
ISBN9781310651410
Unavailable
Pre-Emption and Precedent: The Significance of Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) for an Israeli Response to an Iranian Nuclear Threat - Osirak Reactor, Covert Actions, Air Strike, IAEA, U.S. Relations
Author

Progressive Management

Progressive Management: For over a quarter of a century, our news, educational, technical, scientific, and medical publications have made unique and valuable references accessible to all people. Our imprints include PM Medical Health News, Advanced Professional Education and News Service, Auto Racing Analysis, and World Spaceflight News. Many of our publications synthesize official information with original material. They are designed to provide a convenient user-friendly reference work to uniformly present authoritative knowledge that can be rapidly read, reviewed or searched. Vast archives of important data that might otherwise remain inaccessible are available for instant review no matter where you are. The e-book format makes a great reference work and educational tool. There is no other reference book that is as convenient, comprehensive, thoroughly researched, and portable - everything you need to know, from renowned experts you trust. Our e-books put knowledge at your fingertips, and an expert in your pocket!

Related to Pre-Emption and Precedent

Related ebooks

Middle Eastern History For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Pre-Emption and Precedent

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words