Implementing Philosophy in Elementary Schools: The Washington Elementary School Philosophy Project
By Ali Bassiri
5/5
()
About this ebook
Written by teachers, professors, and the founders of the project, Principal Maria Evans and Dr. Ali Bassiri, the contents cover every aspect of preparing students for philosophy. Implementing Philosophy in Elementary Schools is the perfect supplement for districts interested in boosting oral language development, critical thinking, and persuasive writing exercises--all essential components of the Common Core Standards.
Teachers will appreciate the easy to follow guidelines, while parents will learn how to discuss abstract topics with their children. Elementary school principals will be inspired to share this book with their staff, with an eye toward raising academic rigor for children. And, best of all, teachers will love reading comprehension strategies and discussion topics that will engage their classes in real-life dilemmas. "Implementing Philosophy in Elementary Schools" is of interest to us all--whether in class, on the playground, or around the dining room table at home.
Related to Implementing Philosophy in Elementary Schools
Related ebooks
Philosophy of Education: Introductory Readings Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Getting to the HEARTS of Teaching Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience And Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whole Brain Learning Theory in Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe School and Society and The Child and the Curriculum Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Differentiating with Graphic Organizers: Tools to Foster Critical and Creative Thinking Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5World Peace and Other 4th-Grade Achievements Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Kick-Start Your Class: Academic Icebreakers to Engage Students Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Crisis To Tranquility: A Guide to Classroom: Management Organization and Discipline Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLucky To Be A Teacher: Life-Changing Affirmations for Positive Classrooms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thinking Games and Activities: Making Critical Thinking Fun for the Classroom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Classroom Success Through Creativity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Good School: How Smart Parents Get Their Kids the Education They Deserve Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Primer for Philosophy and Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Practical Enquiry into the Philosophy of Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings50 Activities for the First Day of School: Teacher Tools, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy in the Classroom Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Outstanding Teaching in a Primary School Classroom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Planning to teach Science: In the Primary Classroom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreative Classroom Management, Grades 3 - 5: A Fresh Approach to Building a Learning Community Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5"Little" Thoughts for the Day: Encouraging Daily Thoughts for Administrators and Teachers to Share with Their Students Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBoredom Busters: Transform Worksheets, Lectures, and Grading into Engaging, Meaningful Learning Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Teaching The Teacher, The Pupil, The School Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvolving Education: Shifting to a Learner-Centered Paradigm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMindsets in the Classroom: Building a Growth Mindset Learning Community Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Being a Teacher: The Human Dimension Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPencils Down!: A Forty-Five Year Teaching Odyssey: a Teacher’S Manual for Educating for Life. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agile Learner: Where Growth Mindset, Habits of Mind and Practice Unite Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dumbing Us Down - 25th Anniversary Edition: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inside American Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost Tools of Learning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Summary of The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A study guide for Frank Herbert's "Dune" Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Speed Reading: How to Read a Book a Day - Simple Tricks to Explode Your Reading Speed and Comprehension Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix (10th Anniversary, Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Competent to Counsel: Introduction to Nouthetic Counseling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Making Friends: Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Four-Hour School Day: How You and Your Kids Can Thrive in the Homeschool Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How To Do Motivational Interviewing: A guidebook for beginners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 5 Love Languages of Teenagers: The Secret to Loving Teens Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Chicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Who Gets In and Why: A Year Inside College Admissions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Implementing Philosophy in Elementary Schools
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Implementing Philosophy in Elementary Schools - Ali Bassiri
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction: Does Philosophy Improve Children’s Thinking?
Chapter 1: Overview Of The Washington Elementary School Philosophy Project
Chapter 2: Lesson Plans And Classroom Sessions
Chapter 3: Philosophical Analysis Of Children’s Story Books
Chapter 4: Making Everyday Discussions More Philosophical
Chapter 5: Preparing The Classroom For Group Discussion
Chapter 6: Assessing The Effectiveness Of Classroom Sessions
Epilogue: Has It Been Worth It? A Principal’s Perspective
Author Bios
INTRODUCTION: Does Philosophy Improve Children’s Thinking?
Thomas E. Wartenberg
Since 2001, I have been teaching a course – Philosophy for Children – at Mount Holyoke College in which my students lead philosophy discussions at a local elementary school. I began the course at the Jackson Street Elementary School in Northampton, MA, where my son was a student. More recently, we have been working at the Martin Luther King Jr. Charter School of Excellence in Springfield, MA, a school whose students are almost all African-American and Hispanic. In fact, our eight-week philosophy class has become part of the second grade curriculum at the school.
In order to demonstrate that elementary school children actually benefit from discussing philosophy, I undertook a research project at the Pioneer Valley Chinese Immersion Charter School in Hadley, MA. I worked with two cognitive psychologists from Boston College who knew how to effectively implement such a research program, Caren Walker and Ellen Winner. Part of the impetus behind their desire was their belief that previous studies of the impact of doing philosophy on young children had not employed the appropriate sort of experimental design. What needed to be done was to develop an experiment
or research program that would be deemed adequate by the standards employed in cognitive psychology.
First, we had to use instruments
that were acknowledged to test what they sought to test and, most centrally, a control group to ensure that the changes in scores one measured in the children were not due to the maturation of the children. In addition, we had to control for the skilled teacher
factor. It has been noted (Kane, Rockoff, and Staiger, 2007) that a skilled teacher has a tremendous impact upon student learner. We would have to be sure that the effect we hoped to find was not due to the skill of the philosophy teacher. Ultimately we came up with the following research project:
We would divide a class of second graders into two groups. One group would have philosophy discussions based on a series of picture books facilitated by a student who had taken my Mount Holyoke College course, Philosophy for Children. The other group would take part in what I called an art history class,
led by another former student of mine. In each art history class session, the teacher
would read a picture book, but the students would be given an art project instead of taking part in a philosophy discussion. The art project asked them to create something – what that something was changed each week – in the style of the artist whose works they had seen in the picture book. After a twelve week session, the two groups were switched, so that the philosophy students would become the art history students and vice versa. The college student would stay with her group, to control for differences in their abilities if any.
The researchers administered tests to the students three times during the year: once before we began the program; once after the first set of philosophy lessons; and once at the end of our teaching. The researchers developed a set of argumentation skills tasks
based upon a method developed by Valle (2009). The children were presented with a picture book that presented conflicting sides dealing with the following child-relevant issues:
1. metaphysical (the existence of aliens)
2. social (boys versus girls)
3. value (candy in school)
4. aesthetic (classical versus rock music)
Here is the value issue as presented in a picture book:
Some people think that soda and candy should be sold in the lunch room in school. They think that kids should choose what they have to eat and drink. Other people think that soda and candy should not be sold in the lunch room at school. They think that adults should decide what children are allowed to eat and drink.
The children were scored on their responses to these four questions:
1. What do you think? Why? (4 points)
2. Can you be sure that you are right? (1 point)
3. Is it possible that there could be new things you could find out that could make you change your mind? (1 point0
4. Disagreeing Alex says, No, No, No! That’s not true.
Now you tell me what Alex says next. What would Alex say if he was trying to convince you that he is right? (4 points)
The scoring was as follows:
0 pts. Answering I don’t know
1 pt. Choosing a side or repeating the claim (Children should not have candy in school because parents should decide what they eat
)
2 pts. Citing the word evidence
or proof
or providing irrelevant evidence (Children should not have candy because there is evidence that parents should decide what they eat
OR Children should not have candy in school because school is for learning math
)
3 pts. Providing relevant, anecdotal evidence (Children should not have candy in school because once I got a tummy ache from too much candy
)
4 pts. For providing relevant, non-anecdotal evidence (Children should not be allowed to have candy in school because too much sugar will make them crazy and they won’t be able to sit still in class.
)
Here are the results:
Pre-Test (before the lessons began), both groups scored approximately 15 on the argumentation test out of a possible 32 points. After the first semester intervention, the philosophy group scored an average of 21 while the art students’ scores declined slightly. At the end of the second semester, the 1st semester philosophy students scored about 22 and the 2nd semester philosophy students now raised their scores to about 21. What this shows is that taking part in a 12-week philosophy discussion improved children’s understanding of argumentation in a significant manner. This effect was durable in that it was maintained over a second semester even when there was no philosophy lesson. (A full presentation and discussion of the results can be found in [Walker, et. al. 2012]).
When I first visited the Washington Elementary School Philosophy Project in the winter of 2012, I was very impressed. Here was a program for teaching philosophy to elementary school children that was based on my own work, but that used parents and volunteers to lead the philosophy lessons. My own innovation