Bridging the Gap: Perspectives on Nationally Competitive Scholarships
By Suzanne McCray and Dana C. Kuchem
()
About this ebook
Read more from Suzanne Mc Cray
Roads Less Traveled and Other Perspectives on Nationally Competitive Scholarships Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll In: Expanding Access through Nationally Competitive Awards Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLights! Camera! Arkansas!: From Broncho Billy to Billy Bob Thornton Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Bridging the Gap
Related ebooks
How To Choose A College That's Right For You! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollege Without Ramen Noodles, A Guide to Affording College Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIndian Americans of Massachusetts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNavigating Diversity and Inclusion in Veterinary Medicine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAce Your Naval Academy Interview Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdult & Continuing Professional Education Practices: Cpe Among Professional Providers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlay the Game: How to Get Accepted and Succeed in Graduate School Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Choosing A College: Get All The Support And Guidance You Need To Be A Success Choosing A College! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeadership by Engineers and Scientists: Professional Skills Needed to Succeed in a Changing World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Graduate's Handbook: Your No-Nonsense Guide for What Comes Next Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAcademic Advising: A Comprehensive Handbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll before Them: Student Opportunities and Nationally Competitive Fellowships Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNaylor Report on Undergraduate Research in Writing Studies, The Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBridging Differences for Better Mentoring: Lean Forward, Learn, Leverage Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fundraising Principles for Faculty and Academic Leaders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Base of the Pyramid Promise: Building Businesses with Impact and Scale Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Strategic Communication for Organizations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRedefining Roles: The Professional, Faculty, and Graduate Consultant’s Guide to Writing Centers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Your Brand: Career Management and Personal PR for Librarians Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundraising Consultants: A Guide for Nonprofit Organizations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGetting Grants: The Complete Manual of Proposal Development and Administration Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Academic Job Search Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Handbook for Student Leadership Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHigher Education Careers Beyond the Professoriate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGraduate from College Debt-Free: Get Your Degree With Money In The Bank Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVisible Learners: Promoting Reggio-Inspired Approaches in All Schools Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeading with Cultural Intelligence 3rd Edition: The Real Secret to Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Use Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence to Mentor Doctoral Learners Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWinter 2016: Fourth Estate, #4 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
The Three Bears Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From 150 to 179 on the LSAT Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A study guide for Frank Herbert's "Dune" Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Speed Reading: How to Read a Book a Day - Simple Tricks to Explode Your Reading Speed and Comprehension Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How To Be Hilarious and Quick-Witted in Everyday Conversation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Easy Spanish Stories For Beginners: 5 Spanish Short Stories For Beginners (With Audio) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study Guide for S.E. Hinton's The Outsiders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conversational Spanish Dialogues: Over 100 Spanish Conversations and Short Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Chicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Call of the Wild and Free: Reclaiming the Wonder in Your Child's Education, A New Way to Homeschool Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Failure of Nerve: Leadership in the Age of the Quick Fix (10th Anniversary, Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everything You Need to Know About Personal Finance in 1000 Words Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Who Gets In and Why: A Year Inside College Admissions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Bridging the Gap
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Bridging the Gap - Suzanne McCray
director).
Introduction
This year marks the twentieth anniversary of Truman and Marshall Scholarships: Breaking the Code, a fellowships advisor workshop held in Fayetteville, Arkansas, in the summer of 1999. The conference focused mainly on two major scholarships but included information about others as well. That foray into advisor and foundation information sharing on multiple scholarships sparked the creation of the National Association of Fellowships Advisors (NAFA), officially launched a year later in Chicago by a group of fifteen advisors, most of whom had attended Breaking the Code. That first conference was about understanding the basics, comparing notes, reaching out directly to foundation members, breaking their codes. After twenty years, some of the same discussions are still relevant as scholarships change goals and requirements, as new awards like the Schwarzman have been added to the opportunities available to students, as advisors develop new competitive award programs for the first time on their campuses, or as new advisors accept a fellowships advising role (approximately one-third of advisors who are members of NAFA have held such a job less than three years). Breaking the code can still seem overwhelming to many. NAFA conferences and books like this one have helped provide what can seem to those just starting out as insider information, but what is actually an effort to create a framework for providing support for exceptional students seeking transformational opportunities to further their academic goals and their professional and personal aspirations.
Those early days have been followed by deeper examinations of the work that both advisors and foundations do. Different conferences, as well as the resulting proceedings, have focused at least to some extent on different recurring themes: the value of the process (Beyond Winning), service (Serving Students and the Public Good), leadership (Leading the Way), access (All In), holistic approaches to serving students (All Before Them), and increasing the scope of awards (Roads Less Traveled). At the 2017 NAFA conference held in Philadelphia, attendees at the Mind the Gap
–themed event were charged with considering the gaps that exist both in our advising practices and in the broader contexts that shape them, as well as how [advisors and foundations] might bridge or eliminate them.
And it is the bridging of such gaps that the essays in this volume seek to do.
The essays included in Bridging the Gap: Perspectives on Nationally Competitive Scholarships are for the most part (though not exclusively) a product of presentations, roundtable discussions, and percolating ideas that were generated for or at the 2017 conference. The collection is divided into four parts. The first, Serving Students,
expands the ways advisors can best support students through the creation of new learning opportunities, by reducing or eliminating bias in the recruitment and selection process, by giving students support and (equally important) space to continue to develop a sense of identity, and finally by allowing students to sink or swim on their own accord. The second, Best Practices for Advisors and Advising Offices,
offers pragmatic advice for advisors on a range of topics including the specific practices of recognizing and addressing gender bias in letters of recommendation, setting up effective selection panels, establishing strategic plans that can drive an office forward, and understanding how graduate students search for opportunities and what that means for their advisors. Part III focuses on international awards—how to develop a general campus environment that supports international awards and how to establish a student culture willing to take the leap to explore another culture intellectually, academically, and personally. Part IV includes the biennial Survey of the Profession to allow directors and staff of individual advising offices to understand the landscape of advising work being conducted across the country.
Karen Weber and Ben Rayder in the volume’s opening essay, Early Research as a Pathway for Nationally Competitive Awards,
make the case for fellowships advising offices to become engaged in active learning programs like undergraduate research, study abroad, and service learning. The authors examine various high-impact practices—a phrase that is currently much discussed in higher education circles—including the actual act of supporting students as they apply for nationally competitive awards. They conclude that perhaps the most effective way to bond students with faculty is through research. To that end, the University of Houston’s Honors College created the Houston Early Research Experience (HERE) that serves all students on the campus, not just honors students. The program recruits and then prepares freshmen and sophomores for future research. Students participate in a two-week workshop in May to learn research fundamentals. The essay details the goals, the student benefits, and the successes of the program. It also makes a persuasive case that such programs can effectively inform students about and guide them to offices of merit awards, which can in turn assist students, who are already on their way in developing strong faculty connections and a research profile, in choosing and competing more successfully for award opportunities that best fit their long-term goals.
Chapter 2 focuses on the Morris K. and Stewart L. Udall Scholarship. Authors Suzanne McCray, Jane Morris, and Paula Randler are all experienced Udall Scholarship reviewers, and Randler is a former Udall Scholar herself who also served as a program manager of the scholarship for several years. This essay provides reviewer perspectives on how applications are read, what leadership means within the Udall Scholarship context, and how the well-known Udall factor
is applied. One of the most salient points is that leadership can be viewed very differently by different scholarship programs and that advisors should be careful to review the individual foundation values (like Udall’s civility, integrity, and consensus
).
Authors Richelle Bernazzoli, Joanna Dickert, Anne Moore, and Jason Kelly Roberts examine authentic student motivation and drive in chapter 3’s Excellent Sheep or Passionate Weirdos? Fellowships and Fellowships Advising as Vehicles for Self-Authorship.
The article begins with an analysis of the perceived and actual purposes of higher education and relies heavily (and takes part of its name from) a controversial but interesting book by William Deresiewicz, Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life. Deresiewicz eschews the sheep and celebrates the weirdos. As chapter 3’s title promises, the authors of this article also look at how students fall into traps of what is expected rather than examining what it is they actually hope to learn, to accomplish, and to be. The article meshes theory with practice and ends with examples of two students who, after relevant experience and self-reflection, decide on a path that seems more appropriate to their goals. They may or may not be fully developed passionate weirdos,
but they do seem to be headed in a direction that feels designed by and right for them.
The last essay in this section (chapter 4) is from Tara Yglesias. Once again Yglesias does not disappoint in her article, You Sank My Fellowship: The ‘Near Miss’ Truman Application.
Yglesias has written many articles on the Truman application process for various proceedings on topics ranging from what constitutes leadership to Truman reviewers, to how students should think about developing a postgraduate studies plan, to surviving the Truman interview. All are written with an inimitable flair. You Sank My Fellowship
is a lively look at why students may not move forward to an interview from the written application review process. Readers of this essay should not be misled by the jaunty prose or the game framework (literally games like Scattergories, Apples to Apples, Connect Four, Chutes and Ladders) that Yglesias employs. Hers is a serious look at why dedicated, talented, and even amazing students are sometimes (indeed all too often) not included as Truman finalists, and it is an easy step to apply these assessments to a broader set of opportunities. Advisors who may have a comprehensive view of the talented students on their own campus are less likely to have that comprehensive view of the applicants that come from across the country. Here students and advisors are likely to take comfort. That there is simply a subjective aspect of choosing scholars that cannot be avoided is less appealing, but may benefit an advisor’s students on some occasions if not on