Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Casimir-Polder forces
between atoms and
magnetodielectric bodies
Stefan Yoshi Buhmann and Dirk-Gunnar Welsch
Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena, Germany
Electronic address: s.buhmann@tpi.uni-jena.de
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Puzzle
What is greater than God,
more evil than the devil?
The poor have it,
the happy need it,
and if you eat it, you will die.
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Puzzle
What is greater than God,
more evil than the devil?
The poor have it,
the happy need it,
and if you eat it, you will die.
Answer: Nothing
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Content
Introduction
QED vacuum and induced forces
Duality in the context of vacuum forces
Motivation
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Content
Introduction
QED vacuum and induced forces
Duality in the context of vacuum forces
Motivation
General Theory
Quantization scheme
Perturbative Casimir-Polder force
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Content
Introduction
QED vacuum and induced forces
Duality in the context of vacuum forces
Motivation
General Theory
Quantization scheme
Perturbative Casimir-Polder force
Recent results: Casimir-Polder force
Specic examples: half space, plate, planar cavity
Born expansion of the Casimir-Polder force
Microscopic origin of the Casimir-Polder force
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Content
Introduction
QED vacuum and induced forces
Duality in the context of vacuum forces
Motivation
General Theory
Quantization scheme
Perturbative Casimir-Polder force
Recent results: Casimir-Polder force
Specic examples: half space, plate, planar cavity
Born expansion of the Casimir-Polder force
Microscopic origin of the Casimir-Polder force
Summary and outlook
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
The QED vacuum
vacuus [lat.]: empty
Classical electrodynamics:
E
n
(r)) = 0, B
n
(r)) = 0 n (no electromagnetic eld)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
The QED vacuum
vacuus [lat.]: empty
Classical electrodynamics:
E
n
(r)) = 0, B
n
(r)) = 0 n (no electromagnetic eld)
QED: [
0
E
i
(r),
B
j
(r
t
)] = i
ijk
k
(r r
t
)
AB
1
2
[[
A,
B])[ (Heisenberg uncertainty relation)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
The QED vacuum
vacuus [lat.]: empty
Classical electrodynamics:
E
n
(r)) = 0, B
n
(r)) = 0 n (no electromagnetic eld)
QED: [
0
E
i
(r),
B
j
(r
t
)] = i
ijk
k
(r r
t
)
AB
1
2
[[
A,
B])[ (Heisenberg uncertainty relation)
QED vacuum: [E
(+)
(r)]
n
) = 0, [B
(+)
(r)]
n
) = 0 n
E(r)) = 0,
E(r) =
k
g
k
(r)a
k
+H.c.
c-number functions
creation/annihilation
operators
E(r) =
k
g
k
(r)a
k
+H.c.
c-number functions
creation/annihilation
operators
E(r) =
_
0
d
_
d
3
r
t
i
0
_
2
c
2
_
Im(r
t
, ) G(r, r
t
, )
f
e
(r
t
, )
+
c
_
Im
1
(r
t
, )
_
t
G(r, r
t
, )
_
f
m
(r
t
, )
_
+H.c.
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom-eld dynamics
H =
H
MF
+
H
A
+
H
AMF
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom-eld dynamics
H =
H
MF
+
H
A
+
H
AMF
Medium-assisted eld Hamiltonian:
H
MF
=
=e,m
_
d
3
r
_
0
d
(r, )
(r, )
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom-eld dynamics
H =
H
MF
+
H
A
+
H
AMF
Medium-assisted eld Hamiltonian:
H
MF
=
=e,m
_
d
3
r
_
0
d
(r, )
(r, )
Atomic Hamiltonian:
H
A
=
2
2m
+
1
2
0
_
d
3
r
P
A
2
(r)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom-eld dynamics
H =
H
MF
+
H
A
+
H
AMF
Medium-assisted eld Hamiltonian:
H
MF
=
=e,m
_
d
3
r
_
0
d
(r, )
(r, )
Atomic Hamiltonian:
H
A
=
2
2m
+
1
2
0
_
d
3
r
P
A
2
(r)
Electric dipole interaction:
H
AMF
=
E(r
A
) +
1
2m
A
_
p
A
,
d
B(r
A
)
_
+
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Ground-state CP force
Idea: System in state [0) [0) ,
Interaction
H
AMF
energy shift E
0
van-der-Waals potential E
0
= E
(0)
0
+U(r
A
)
Casimir-Polder force F(r
A
) =
A
U(r
A
)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Ground-state CP force
Idea: System in state [0) [0) ,
Interaction
H
AMF
energy shift E
0
van-der-Waals potential E
0
= E
(0)
0
+U(r
A
)
Casimir-Polder force F(r
A
) =
A
U(r
A
)
2
nd
-order perturbation theory:
2
E
0
=
[0[0[
H
AMF
[)[
2
E
0
E
[0[0[
H
AMF
[)[
2
E
0
E
Result:
U(r
A
) =
0
2
_
0
duu
2
(iu) TrG
(1)
(r
A
, r
A
, iu)
Atomic polarizability:
() = lim
0
2
3
k0
[d
0k
[
2
2
k0
2
i
Scattering Green
tensor:
G
(1)
(r
A
, r
A
, iu)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
1
A
z
() ( )
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
1
A
z
() ( )
Short distance: z
A
_ c/
+
M
, c/
+
A
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
1
A
z
()
Short distance: z
A
_ c/
+
M
, c/
+
A
Purely dielectric half space: U(z
A
) =
C
3
z
3
A
C
3
=
16
2
0
_
0
du(iu)
(iu) 1
(iu) +1
0
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
1
A
z
( )
Short distance: z
A
_ c/
+
M
, c/
+
A
Purely dielectric half space: U(z
A
) =
C
3
z
3
A
C
3
=
16
2
0
_
0
du(iu)
(iu) 1
(iu) +1
0
Purely magnetic half space: U(z
A
) = +
C
1
z
A
C
1
=
16
2
0
_
0
du
_
u
c
_
2
(iu)
_
(iu) 1
(iu) +1
+
(iu) 1
2
_
0
1
S.Y.B., Ho Trung Dung, T. Kampf, and D.G.W., EPJD, DOI:
10.1140/epjd/e2005-00044-6 (2005)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
Long distance: z
A
c/
M
, c/
A
U(z
A
) =
C
4
z
4
A
C
4
= C
4
[(0), (0), (0)] 0
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
Long distance: z
A
c/
M
, c/
A
U(z
A
) =
C
4
z
4
A
C
4
= C
4
[(0), (0), (0)] 0
1
3
5
7
9
11
1 1.5 2 2.5 3
(0)
(0)
repulsive
attractive
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near half space
Numerical results: Two-level atom, Drude-Lorentz model
-0.0004
0
0.0004
0.0008
0 2 4 6 8 10
bar200.txt u 3:8
bar180.txt u 3:8
bar160.txt u 3:8
bar120.txt u 3:8
bar043.txt u 3:8
PSfrag replacements
z
A
Tm
/c
U
(
z
A
)
1
2
2
c
/
(
3 T
m
d
2 1
0
)
Pm
= 2.00
Pm
= 1.80
Pm
= 1.60
Pm
= 1.20
Pm
= 0.43
C
1
C
3
C
4
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Atom near plate
Numerical results: Two-level atom, Drude-Lorentz model
0
0.0004
0.0008
0.0012
2 4 6 8
PSfrag replacements
z
A
Tm
/c
U
(
z
A
)
1
2
2
c
/
(
3 T
m
d
2 1
0
)
d
10
/c =0.01
d
10
/c =0.10
d
10
/c =0.55
d
10
/c =1.50
d
10
/c =4.00
d
10
/c
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Relations between dispersion forces
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Relations between dispersion forces
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Relations between dispersion forces
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Born expansion of the vdW potential
Method: =1 +
expand G in powers of (Born series)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Born expansion of the vdW potential
Method: =1 +
expand G in powers of (Born series)
Result:
U(r
A
) =
k=1
k
U(r
A
)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Born expansion of the vdW potential
Method: =1 +
expand G in powers of (Born series)
Result:
U(r
A
) =
k=1
k
U(r
A
)
k
U(r
A
) =
()
k
0
2c
2k
_
0
duu
2k+2
(iu)
_
_
k
j=1
_
d
3
s
j
(iu, s
j
)
_
_
Tr [G
vac
(r
A
, s
1
, iu) G
vac
(s
1
, s
2
, iu) . . . G
vac
(s
k
, r
A
, iu)]
=
+ +
...
10
/c
U
(
z
A
)
1
2
0
c
3
/
(
3 1
0
|
d
0
1
|
2
)
(a)
(b)
(c)
0
0
5 10 15
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.002
electric
magnetic
d
i
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
m
a
g
n
e
t
o
1
U(z
A
) +
2
U(z
A
) =
_
z
A
dz
d
1
U
d
(z) +
2
U
d
(z)
+
_
z
A
dz
d
_
0
ds
d
2
U
dd
(z
A
, s)
A
z
A
z
A
z
z
z s
=
+
1
S.Y.B., T. Kampf, and D.G.W., submitted to PRA
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Microscopic origin of the vdW potential
Dilute atomic gas: (r, ) =
1
0
n(r)()
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Microscopic origin of the vdW potential
Dilute atomic gas: (r, ) =
1
0
n(r)()
Result:
U(r
A
) =
k=1
1
k!
_
_
k
j=1
_
d
3
s
j
n(s
j
)
_
_
U(r
A
, s
1
, . . . , s
k
)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat Jena QED 2005 Les Houches
Microscopic origin of the vdW potential
Dilute atomic gas: (r, ) =
1
0
n(r)()
Result:
U(r
A
) =
k=1
1
k!
_
_
k
j=1
_
d
3
s
j
n(s
j
)
_
_
U(r
A
, s
1
, . . . , s
k
)
U(r
1
, . . . , r
l
) =
()
l1
l
0
2l
_
0
duu
2l
[(iu)]
l
p
Tr
_
G
vac
(r
p(1)
, r
p(2)
, iu) . . . G
vac
(r
p(l)
, r
p(1)
, iu)
_
=
+ +
...