Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Contents
Definition of operative Principles of tooth
dentistry Indication for operative treatment Rationale of pediatric treatment General consideration regarding pediatric dentistry Classification of dental caries
preparation Various materials used in pediatric restorations Amalgam Restoration GIC restoration Resin based composites Comparative studies
Definition
Art and science of the DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, and
PROGNOSIS of defects of teeth that do not require full coverage restoration for correction. Treatment should result in the restoration of proper tooth form, function, and esthetics, while maintaining the physiologic integrity of the teeth in harmonious relationship with the adjacent hard and soft tissues.
All of which should enhance the general health and
smile care
5
children
development / resorption
Caries experience of the patient: Caries risk assessment
based on history
Patients oral hygiene Patient cooperation & parent compliance Individually tailored treatment plan
Primary tooth is small, bulbous, bell shaped Definite cervical constriction Pulpal outline DEJ Pulp horns are highly placed Thin & uniform thick enamel
Symmetry of caries attack
Finns modification
Class I: Cavities involving the pit and fissures of the molar
teeth which may or may not involve a labial or a lingual extension tooth which involve the incisal angle
Class IV: A restoration of the proximal surface of an anterior Class V: Cavities present on the cervical third of all teeth,
including proximal surface where the marginal ridge is not included in the cavity preparation
10
Sturdevants Classification:
Simple Cavity- One surface Compound Cavity- Two surfaces Complex Cavity- + Two surfaces
11
Baumes Classification:
Pit & Fissure Cavities Smooth Surface Cavities
12
1.2
2.2
1.3
2.3
1.4
2.4
3.2
3.3
3.4
13
14
Class I :- all pits and fissure restoration are class I , and are assigned to three groups. Restoration on occlusal surface of molars and premolars. Restoration on occlusal two thirds of the facial and lingual surfaces of molars.
15
maxillary incisors.
2. Class II :Restoration on the proximal surfaces of posterior teeth. 3.Class III :Restoration on the proximal surfaces of anterior teeth that do not involve the incisal angles.
16
4. Class IV :Restoration on the proximal surfaces of anterior teeth that do involve the incisal edges.
5. Class V :Restoration on the gingival third of the facial or lingual surfaces of all teeth.
17
6. Class VI :Restoration on the incisal edge of anterior teeth or the occlusal cusp heights of posterior teeth.
18
this stage includes excavating any remaining ,infected carious dentin,removing old restorative material if indicated,protecting pulp.
19
follows: Initial tooth preparation: Step 1. outline form and initial depth Step 2. primary resistance form Step 3. primary retention form Step 4. convenience form
20
old restorative material,if indicated. Step 6. pulp protection, if indicated Step 7. secondary resistance and retention form Step 8. final procedures-cleaning , inspecting,sealing.
21
it is the placement of the preparation margins in the position they will occupy in the final preparation, except for finishing the enamel walls and margins.it also includes preparing an initial depth of 0.20.5 mm pulpally beyond the DEJ.
22
PRINCIPLES:
1)
2) Include all faults 3) Place margins such that good finishing of the margins of the restoration is possible.
23
FACTORS:
Certain factors affect the decision regarding the extent of the outline form . they are: Extent of the carious lesion, defect or faulty old
restoration.
Esthetic requirements which may affect the choice of
FEATURES:
Generally proper outline form may be established if the following features are incorporated: 1)Preserve cuspal strength. 2)Preserve marginal ridge strength. 3)Minimize faciolingual extension. 4)Use enameloplasty wherever possible.
25
26
restoration.
27
splints.
iv. Need to adjust tooth contours.
28
STEP 2: FORM.
PRIMARY
RESISTANCE
It may be defined as
the shape and placement of the preparation wall that best enables the restoration and the tooth to withstand, without fracture, masticatory forces delivered principally in the long axis of the tooth.
29
PRINCIPLES:
THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES INVOLVED IN
1.
2.
3.
4. To cap weak cusps and envelope or include enough of a weakened tooth with in the restration.
5. To provide enough thickness of restorative material
appropriate.
31
minimal
FACTORS:
Certain factors affect the resistance form of
the preparation:
1)
FEATURES:
The following features enhance primary resistance form: 1) Relatively flat floors 2) Box shape 3) Including all weakened tooth structure 4) Preservation of tooth and marginal ridges
34
35
STEP 3. FORM
IT is
PRIMARY
RETENTION
the shape or form of the conventional preparation that resists displacement or removal of the restoration by tipping or lifting forces.
PRINCIPLES: the principles of primary retention form
For amalgam:
37
Close parallelism of opposing walls with a slight degree of occlusal divergence. 2. Occlusal dovetail
1. 1.
38
the shape or form of the preparation that provides for adequate observation , and ease of operation in preparing and restoring the tooth.
39
FEATURES:
1.
Providing adequate width and lateral extensions for tooth preparation for all restorative materials. Refining line and point angles.
2.
3.
the objectives of initial tooth preparation, the preparation is inspected carefully for other needs.
For most conservative restoration at this stage itself
steps required.
41
STEP 5.REMOVAL OF ANY REMAINING ENAMEL PIT OR FISSURE,INFECTED DENTIN, OR OLD RESTORATIVE MATERIAL IF INDICATED
the elimination of any infected
carious tooth structure or faulty restorative material left in the tooth after initial tooth preparation.
42
PRINCIPLES:
The deeper portion of carious dentin may generally exhibit two distinct areas:
1.
INFFECTED DENTIN: this is more superficial layer which is soft and leathery. High concentration of irreversibly denatured. Must be removed.
43
bacteria
and
collagen
is
It does not contain bacteria and is reversibly denatured. Therefore this layer must be preserved.
44
if:
1) It would affect the esthetics of the new restoration 2) It may compromise the retention of new restoration 3) There is evidence of secondary caries
45
46
is actually not a step in tooth preparation in the strict sense but since it is a step in adapting the preparation for receiving the final restoration it s considered under final tooth preparation.
step is achieved by the use varnish,liners,bases or bonding agents. of cavity
This
47
1)Extent of tooth destruction and preparation to the pulp. 2) Type of restorative material to be used
proximity of
48
exposure areas. It is recommended to have approximately a 1mm thickness of calcium hyroxide over near or actual exposure areas.
The varnish prevents penetration of material into
49
complex cavity preparation where additional preparational features are required to improve resistance and retention form.
types:
1. Mechanical features 2. Conditioning procedures
50
1)
Groove extention
Skirts
2) conditioning procedures:
These include etching and bonding. These are employed for bonded restoration like glass
52
the preparation walls is the further development, when indicated, of a specific cavosurface design and degree of smoothness or roughness that produces the maximum effectiveness of the restorative material being used.
53
OBJECTIVES:
1.
To allow a smooth marginal junction between the restoration and the tooth. To provide close adaptation between the restoration and the tooth structure so that marginal seal is maintained. To provide maximum strength for both the tooth and the restorative material at and near the margins.
54
2.
3.
FACTORS:
Certain factors decide the type of finishing necessary for the external walls:
1) The direction of the enamel walls 2) Support of enamel rods at the DEJ and at preparation
side
55
56
material employed:
1)design of the cavosurface angle For amalgam:- cavosurface or butt joint recommended.
.
57
2)Degree of smoothness or roughness of the wallthis also vary with the type of restorative material used
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Class I Restorations
All pit-and-fissure restorations are Class I, and they are
assigned to three groups, as follows. Restorations on Occlusal Surface of Premolars and Molars Restorations on Occlusal Two Thirds of the Facial and Lingual Surfaces of Molars Restorations on Lingual Surface of Maxillary Incisors.
65
AAPD, 2008
Dental amalgam is recommended for:
1. Class I restorations in primary and permanent teeth; 2. Class II restorations in primary molars where the preparation does not extend beyond the proximal line angles; 3. Class II restorations in permanent molars and pre- molars; 4. Class V restorations in primary and permanent poste- rior teeth.
66
AAPD, 2008
Glass ionomers can be recommended as: 1. luting cements; 2. cavity base and liner; 3. Class I, II, III, and V restorations in primary teeth; 4. Class III and V restorations in permanent teeth in high risk patients or teeth that cannot be isolated; 5. caries control with:
a. high-risk patients; b. restoration repair; c. ITR; d. ART.
67
AAPD,2008
Resin-based composites are indicated for: 1. Class I pit-and-fissure caries where conservative pre- ventive resin restorations are appropriate; 2. Class I caries extending into dentin; 3. Class II restorations in primary teeth that do not ex- tend beyond the proximal line angles; 4. Class II restorations in permanent teeth that extend approximately one third to one half the buccolingual intercuspal width of the tooth; 5. Class III, IV, V restorations in primary and permanent teeth; 6. strip crowns in the primary and permanent dentitions. Contraindications: Resin-based composites are not the restorations of choice in the following situations: 1. where a tooth cannot be isolated to obtain moisture control; 2. in individuals needing large multiple surface restora- tions in the posterior primary dentition
68
69
Prophylactic odontomy
Recommended by Hyatt (1923)
70
71
72
73
and fissures Include deep susceptible pits and fissures Overdestruction of cusps not acceptable Isthmus- to 1/3
Resistance form-Class I- atleast 0.5 mm
below DEJ Flat pupal floor when ever possible Rounded internal line angles Cavo surface margin- 90o
74
Cavity preparation for 1st primary molar-conservative amalgam Cavity Preserve central ridge
Try not to enter dentin untill
75
nd 2
may be formed
lingual restorations
76
mesial pit and grooves seperating them. Avoid crossing oblique ridge
77
78
79
lesions can be prepared by using a no. 2 small, round or a no.330 bur to carefully remove the carious enamel. , 1/8 or 1/16 size according to the size of carious lesionFor enameloplasy Air abrasion can also be used
80
Conditioning of enamel Gel/liquid etchant placed Washed with air water spray Enamel dried throughly (moist for acetone based adhesive) Primer and adhesive placed Placement of resin based composite: flowable
composite preferred over pit and fissure sealant Pit in centric occlusion restored with resin based composite
81
bur and spoon excavator Sharp line angles avoided Flat ended fissure burs contraindicated Disclosing agents might be used
82
Choice of material
GIC- indicated in active lesions
Primary focus towards removal of soft caries Fluoride releasing properties considered
Larger lesions
83
Conditioning of enamel Enamel should be dried- frosty white appearence Complete dehydration of dentin not recommended GIC base might be used as dentin replacement- to be place immediately after etchant befor bonding agent is placed Bonding agent- thin film, avoid pooling at base Placement of composite or compomer 2mm increment- 20 sec curing
84
Indirect pulp capping might be required Calcium hydroxide base placed confined to
If GIC used- Enamel conditioned using Dentin conditioned using polyacrylic acid Final bevel placed after GIC base placement
85
86
88
Conclsion
Therefore , since the form of cavity preparation in
primary teeth is partly governed by their anatomy , newer materials with better adhesive properties are recommended so that minimal destruction of the tooth structure is required.
The more ideal materials are expected to have better
fluoride releasing properties , better aesthetics and a more functionally appropriate stress bearing strength
89
References
Pediatric Dentistry: A Clinical Approach by Goran Koch
kAssess.pdf FDI statement. Minimal intervention in the management of dental caries. FDI general assembly 1 October 2002 Kreulen CM, van Amerngen et al. Two yeas results with box only resin compposite restorations.J Dent Child 1995;NovDec:395-39 Murdoch-Kinch C A, McLean M E. Minimally invasive 90 dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003(Jan); 134:87-95
Mount GJ and Hume WR: Preservation and restoration of tooth structure. Mosby 1998; 121-154 Mount GJ, Hume WR. A revised classification of carious lesions by site and size. Quintessence Int 1997;28:301-303 Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry: rationale of cavity design. Operative dent 2003;28:92-99 Mount GJ. Minimal treatment of the carious lesion. Int Dent J 1991;41:55-59
91
92