Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Appellate Brief by State

    Enviado por

    Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
    2K visualizações25 páginas
    This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.

    Direitos autorais

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formatos disponíveis

    PDF ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    2K visualizações25 páginas

    Appellate Brief by State

    Enviado por

    Mark A. Adams JD/MBA
    This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 25
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellanr, v Case No. 2006 MARK A. ADAMS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT AN AND FOX PINSLLAS CUUNIY STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL. DONNA S$. KOCH Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No. 865974 concourse Center 4 3507 E. Frontage Road, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33607-7013 (813) 287-7900 Fax (813) 281-5500 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT TABLE OF CONTENTS ABLE OF CLUATLONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS... .... SUMMARY OF THR ARGUMENT Eye i AROUMENT 2. . UTR alanie eset et UU IMI LETTER WHETHER THE SUCCESSOR JUDG2 ERRED IN REVERSING A FINAL ORDER OF THE PREDECESSOR JUDGE TSsiR TT : eras WHETHER THE SUCCESSOR JUDCE ERRED IN RULING ‘TIME WEBER APFIDAVIT WAS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT CONULUSLUN Se CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .....------ CRRTTFTCATR OF FONT COMPLIANCE . 1.7... ee e iL 14 20 20 TABLE OP CITATIONS cases Adams v. State, 2003-4844 (Fla. 2d November 24, 2003) Adams v. State, 884 So. ad 287 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) Aceizaya v. Spices, B41 So. zd 4y4 (ila. 2d DCA 2003) - Barwick v. State, 660 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1995) allele Bryant v Stare, 363 So. 24 1141 (Fla. 1% DCA 1978) Castro v. buce, 650 So. 24 1067 (Fla, 2d DCA 1995) Decoro v. State, 771 Sc. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) . Riehert v. State, 199 So. 24 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), aff/d, 201 80. 24 726 (Fla. 1967) 5X parte Crews, 127 Hla. 381, 1/¥ So. 24> (Fla. 1947) Folson v. Folson, 509 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) Hagerman v. Hagerman, 751 80. 24 152 (Pla. 24 DCA 2000) Jacksuu v. Slate, 881 So. 24 666 (Fla. 5 DCA 2004). Lowe v. State, 468 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) Mackenzie v. Super Kids Eargain Stare, 565 So. 24 1332 (Fla. 1990) ii 10, me, or a 15 17 13

    Você também pode gostar