My Contact With UFO's

Message Page 1 of 10
Subject: fs1 - Contact with UFO's
My Contact with UFO's by Dino Kraspedon chapter one
Preface to this second edition Introduction A Pleasant Surprise.
God Matter and Energy
Overcoming Gravity
Authors Note
Astro Navigation
Sundry Topics
Olaf Roemers Experiments
The Aberation of light
Man wasted Efforts
The atomic danger
file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

Life on other worlds
Farewell and Conclusion
DEDICATION
To all those who fought, and are fighting, for the progress of ideas, against the
bitter criticism and injured pride of their contemporaries, in a desire to create a
better world: not for themselves, but in order to lighten the burden of life for
future generations
"I am surprised that scientists of Earth should continue to put their trust in
their false science, in spite of all its errors they have so far been unable to
rectify, and to deny the supreme science which is God They are like glow-worms
enamoured of their own light, crying out to other glow-worms, The Sun does not
exist; the light in my tail is the only light there is'"
(The Captain of the Flying Saucer)
Preface to Second Edition

WHEN we wrote this book we had not expected so rapid a confirmation of many of our
affirmations. A month after the first edition had come off the press a Dutchman
announced that he had been in contact with beings from Venus who informed him that
another Sun would come into our planetary system, which is in accord with what we
wrote. A Professor of Roman Law at the Catholic university of Santos said he had
been in contact with the crew of a flying saucer, and his story is similar to ours,
including details of the system of propulsion by the creation of a vacuum, which no
one had mentioned before this book was published. Counties like the U.S.A. and
Great Britain published the results of their researches and announced that they
hoped to construct interplanetary craft using ionisation as a means of propulsion
similar to that described in this book.
We have said that gravity is a combination of phenomena in which the atmosphere

plays a large part and beyond which one is almost entirely free from gravity. We
showed that all objects have the same rate of fall in a vacuum which disproves
Newton's law as it shows that the mass of the objects is attracted by the vertical,
component of magnetism. Many "boffins" would be highly amused at this, but the
success of the sputniks shows there is some truth in what we have said.
The Reds announced that they had launched an artificial satellite weighing 86 kg.
whereas the Americans, obstinately clinging to the laws of gravity and relativity,
doubted the truth of the Soviet announcement, having calculated that only a
satellite of 5kg. could maintain itself in orbit.
The Soviets replied by saying that not only was there an 86 kg. satellite in orbit,
but that the third stage of the carrier rocket had, contrary to expectations, also
gone into orbit round the Earth; and the rocket weighing much more than the
satellite. The theory of gravitation is therefore a non sequitur.
At this height, free of the atmosphere and subject only to a small proportion of
the vertical component of magnetism, the satellite becomes more subject to its
horizontal component and moves at a certain speed corresponding to the relation
between its mass and the magnetic impulse. As magnetic lines of force describe a
circular path around the planet, both these bodies launched into space went into
orbit round us.

We should have been happy to have received even the smallest scientific
confirmation, let alone this wealth of proof which has accumulated in so short a
time.
It was apparently not God's will that proof should be lacking, as even the Soviets
have declared that planets are repelled by the light of the Sun and not attracted
by it.
This statement is to be found in our book, and we can go so far as to say that it
is the backbone of the system we have described.
We could make a long list of all the proofs such as observations of aurorae,
properties of electrons, etc., but it would tire the reader's patience as he would
have read about these himself in the Press. We would, however, like to publish a
letter from the U.S.S.R. addressed to one of our scientific friends:
Please note I was unable to convert the Russian script for the address (web editor)
Moscow, 26th September, 1957
Dear Sir~
We have your letter, together with your book My Contact with Flying Saucers which
we have passed on to the astronomical section of the Academy of Sciences of the
U.S.S.R. (Bolshaya Gruzinskaya St. 10), asking them to reply directly to you. We
are of the opinion that Soviet astronomers will be very interested in the work of
their Brazilian colleagues.
Sincerely,
(signed) Constantin Chugunov.
(Head of the American Department of Voks).
We would like to point out that our friend, who shall remain anonymous, sent a copy
of this book to a friend of his in Russia without asking for any comment from the
Academy of Sciences. He only wanted to show that the West was taking some interest
in flying saucers. Being a scientist and not wishing to give the Russians the
impression that he was a raving lunatic, he told his Soviet friend that our book
was in the nature of space fiction and was a sample of a new type of Western
literature. However, the Head of Voks, who is also a scientist, when he had taken
note of the problem, passed it on for study by the greatest academy of science in
the world. Surely the Reds are not idiots. Why should they waste their time
studying a work of fiction? Could it be that they found something more in it than
light reading?
The book was sent off in June and as early as October the U.S.S.R. published the
results of its researches on the effect of the repulsion of solar light Far be it
from us to say that the fruits of the Soviet scientists' researches were based on
this book, but we are in any case grateful for the moral support which we have
derived from them. If they accept our scientific theories, may they not forget to
take note of our ethical conclusions also. May their hearts ponder on the humanist
and religious aspects as fully as their minds have worked on the scientific ones.
The deference that has been shown to our book by cultural institutions in the
U.S.S.R. is flattering to us and should help to call our authorities' attention not

to the book itself, but to the whole subject of flying saucers.
If they are loath to follow the Soviet example, they should at least take note of
the desperate attempts that the Americans are making to obtain all possible
information about flying saucers, which border, in certain cases, on the
unscrupulous. This does not apply only to the Americans, but to the Russians as
well.
Many people have attacked us and even those who believe in the existence of flying
saucers are subjected to invective by the incredulous. We have disregarded them and
not taken offence. It is not us they are attacking, but Truth, and this, whatever
they may say now, will one day triumph. They can no more deter us with insults than
pebbles can stop an advancing wave. The wave of Truth will one day break over them
and submerge them.
Dmo Kraspedon
Sao Paulo. November 1957.
INTRODUCTION
THE events which are described in this book have been kept secret since November
1952.
We wanted at all costs to keep quiet about them for fear of the criticism of people
who believe only in an Earthly life and who could not credit the existence of other
human beings in the solar system capable of reasoning in scientific terminology as
good as, if not better than, our own.
This does not mean to say that our believing in the existence of other inhabited
worlds beyond this nutshell in space, of which we are so proud, is just an act of
faith; we are convinced that it is highly probable that life is not just an
accident that happened to a globe with no special attributes, as ours is.
If this is a reasonable premise, then it is also equally possible that there should
be an exchange of scientific, spiritual and other ideas between planets. Such
exchanges between the inhabitants of other worlds who have been able to free
themselves from the shackles that still bind the feet of proud homo sapiens are
probably at a higher level than we can conceive of, and for reasons that are beyond
our imagination.
In spite of our self-imposed silence, we were on one occasion asked to take part in
a reunion at the residence of one of our generals where a young lad was to give an
account of a strange journey which he had made to a distant planet with the crew of
a flying saucer.
In order to give some moral support to the lad and put him at easer we told him
some of the things that had happened to us, with the result that everybody wanted
to know the rest of the story. We gave them some of the facts and remained silent
about others which we did not consider relevant at the time.
It is, however, difficult for a man to keep quiet about flying saucers, especially
when someone else is holding forth about them.

Within a short time we were being pressed from all sides to tell the whole story,
which we had to repeat a number of times. We gave an account of fragments of it, so
as not to impose on our host, but our attempts to cut the story short merely
aroused greater interest. A certain gentleman who spent most of his time arguing
with people who had seen saucers, and to whom we had confided a few things,
promised faithfully not to pass them on. A few days later he invited us to visit a
friend of his.
When we arrived, thinking that it was an ordinary social call, we were met by about
forty people' who had been "specially" invited to hear us. We were surprised that
this topic, which holds so much interest for the world, should have been handled so
indiscreetly. As we did not wish to appear discourteous to our hosts, we invented
some fairy stories about flying saucers which passed the time and gave full rein to
our sense of humour. It was an amusing evening.
We mention this to show the reader that we never did have, nor have, any desire for
publicity; the publication of this book has been brought upon us by force of
circumstance. We had many cash offers for the story which we always declined in
spite of our abject poverty.
This book does not contain all the information we received,
but represents a resume of it. There are certain things which we considered it our
duty to withhold, partly in accordance with our informant's wishes, and partly on
our own judgment. Furthermore, there are other things which we intend to publish in
a separate book which do not really come within the scope of a work for the general
public, such as this one.
We have also withheld the details of our first meeting with the flying saucers, as
it was our sole intention to make known the viewpoints of the people that man these
mysterious craft.
We wished thereby to avoid relating minor details which others have already done to
good effect.
As far as was possible we have avoided bringing in religious questions, since an

invasion of a territory reserved for those properly ordained might well appear as
an impertinence on our part.
If we have here and there made reference to religion, it is because we have been
forced to do so and because we did not wish the subject to suffer as a result of
our being too unwilling to risk the possibility of treading on other people's toes.
The remarks in this book do not imply that we disdain the honest efforts made by
our scientists and the sincere efforts of thousands of research workers bent over
test tubes and various apparatus in search of the unknown, and to whom we, in fact,
owe what well-being we enjoy, and the little enlightenment that is left to us. We
respect their efforts and hold them in highest regard.
We are certain that if errors or omissions have crept into science it is not due to
bad faith on the part of the scientists, who have dedicated their lives to the
search for true knowledge.
The thing that appals us is that the long hours, the sacrifice of lives, and all
the efforts of thousands of inquiring minds which only had the common good in view
should have been diverted by pseudo-scientists towards the destruction of this
humanity which produced so many geniuses and which is held in such high esteem by

the truly wise.
We do not attack science as such, but only those who pervert it. Those who dedicate
themselves to the nefarious task of destroying human life no longer have the right
to call themselves scientists. It would be an insult to Newton, Galileo, Fleming,
Laplace, Kepler, Lagrange, Hertz and all those others to include among their number
the bloodthirsty individual responsible for letting off atomic bombs over Hiroshima
and Nagasaki. Pascal would turn in his grave if he should one day be compared with
the individual who produced the" G" gas.
It is possible for anyone to make a correct observation, yet draw false

conclusions from it. Newton thwarted progress in the field of optics for about a
century merely because he drew a wrong conclusion, but nobody could blame him for
it, or doubt his good faith. Aristotle's philosophical theories blocked the path of
human knowledge for several centuries, but he was honest with himself and his
fellow beings. We could say the same for a great many others in all branches of
knowledge where the flash of genius was accompanied by tremendous mistakes.
But we pay our respects to those whose only motivating interest was honesty and
love of science, and do not dwell on the mistakes they were in some way or other
responsible for, bound as they were by the limited knowledge of their times and a
false appreciation of Nature's laws.
Everything is forgivable in man within the concept of perfection which we hold.

What he can never be forgiven is wilful wrongdoing and the abuse of knowledge
endangering the life and most cherished aspirations of his less enlightened and
intelligent fellow beings.
Nor does this book intend to refute other works which have dealt with the question
of flying saucers, and which describe different types and different principles from
those shown by us. We know that even on one planet there are men of various types
ranging from black to white, from pigmy to giant.
We believe these other stories, for we believe in other people's honesty.
We have confined ourselves to repeating what we heard. It is obvious that the words
printed here are not the very ones which the captain of the flying saucer spoke.
Even if we had taken them down verbatim, we still could not reproduce the whole
message. We have, however, tried to simplif3r matters, and used the same reasoning
and the same logic as our informant, albeit a lamentably poor imitation, in an
attempt to bring out the spirit of his replies rather than his actual words.
If we should later receive confirmation of the ideas put forward, perhaps this book
will be looked upon as having contributed something to the unravelling of the
mystery of the so-called" Unidentified Flying Objects." If, however, they are not
confirmed, we lay ourselves open to charges of misrepresentation.
We are fully aware of the risks we run, if it turns out that we have been victims
of a cruel deception, but we remain undaunted.
However, the last thing we -want to do is to give the impression that we are in any
way better than the next man, or that we have vast knowledge with which to
contradict everything that scientists have proclaimed to date. We do not wish to
resemble that glow-worm which the captain of the flying saucer referred to, who was
so proud of his own light endowed by Nature, that he cried out to all the other
glow-worms:

The sun does not exist because the only light there is is the one I carry in my
tail.
Dino Kraspedon
A Pleasant Surprise
The doorbell rang three times. My wife came and told me that there was a parson at
the door who wanted to speak to me.
"What does he want?" I asked apprehensively.
"I don't know, but it looks as if he wants to preach at you, replied my wife.
Almost every Sunday Protestant parsons, or ordinary preachers, would come along to
preach at us or try to convert us to their belief. As, at that time, I was an
atheist in the widest sense of the word, I hated long biblical dissertations and,
in fact, had an aversion to anything that smacked of religion.
We won't be able to go out with the children now," I remarked.
"No, I suppose we won't," said my wife," but never mind, if we don't go today,
we'll go another day."
"It's not fair that the children should miss their walk. The will have to go out
after lunch by themselves."
I had a good mind to tell the parson I could not see him, but then decided that he
was probably quite harmless. After all, he was only coming to see if he could get
me into heaven. I went downstairs far from pleased, but maintained an air of
politeness, and managed to put on a smile.
Sitting downstairs, however, I found a well-dressed man in a good cashmere suit

which fitted his athletic body perfectly. As a rule priests dress unostentatiously,
but this one was singularly well turned out. He had a white shirt with a stiff
collar, and a blue tie with white geometrical patterns. His shoes did not look as
if they had been worn for more than a month or two.
My attention was drawn to the fine weave of his gloves, and I remembered where I
had seen this type of glove before. As I came face to face with him, I almost lost
my voice with surprise; I recognised him as the captain of a flying saucer.
In November 1952 I was touring with a friend in the State of Sao Paulo. On reaching
the top of the Angatuba range coming up from Parana, we were confronted by five
saucers hovering in the air. It was a rainy day and visibility was had.
I went back to the same spot later and spent thee days and nights there in the hope
of seeing a saucer again. On the last night, after a series of episodes which we
will not go into here for fear of digression, a saucer landed and we were given the
chance of going inside it and meeting its crew.
We stayed on board for about an hour looking at the various pieces of equipment in
the machine. The captain was kind enough to explain how they all worked. At the end
of our visit, this fascinating individual promised to come and see us as soon as he
was able. And now, four or five months later, he had come as romised.

"Your surprise is quite understandable," he said, getting up from the armchair and
extending his hand, "but I have come to return your visit to my craft. I have come,
not only because I promised, but because I very much wanted to have the pleasure of
seeing you again."
"I feel I hardly deserve such a gracious gesture on your part, especially as I have
nothing to offer you but the hand of friendship."
"If you were to offer me the whole Earth, but not the hand of friendship, it would
be worth nothing. Only friendship has real value. I accept it with gratitude as I
have come to offer you the same thing: my hand of friendship.
Please excuse me for having presented myself as a parson, but you must realise that
your wife would be very disturbed if she knew the truth."
"It was a harmless subterfuge," I reassured him, "and I am grateful to you for it;
my wife would certainly be unhappy if she one day thought her husband was mixed up
in some subversive activity in partnership with a foreign agent who passed himself
off as a gentleman wandering about in space.
"In fact I had never believed that flying saucers were extraterrestrial. The whole
thing appeared to me as a deception on the part of people of Earth, presenting
themselves as beings from another world, and exploiting humanity's vague desire to
know that there is other human life within the solar system, in order better to
carry on some nefarious activity or other.'
My visitor merely smiled. "I assure you," he said, "that your suspicions are
groundless, but there is no doubt that it your duty to be on your guard against
possible deception. Or thing is certain however; if I were a foreign agent I show
long since have conquered the Earth, and you would have pa dearly for your
curiosity which led you into my craft."
At this point my wife came in with the children. She told me that lunch was ready
and that the "parson" was welcome to eat with us. She would be going out and would
not be back until the evening.
During lunch I wanted to try out my guest's linguistic ability to see whether he
would betray his origin by his accent. I started off by discussing the Christian
religion and asked him if he could tell me the first words of the Old Testament in
Hebrew, to which he replied promptly and without the slightest hesitation or
embarrassment, "Bereshith bara Elohim,"*1 and proceeded to recite a lengthy
passage.
I continued the discussion in the same vein without letting him know that he was
being put through his paces. At one point I pretended to be day-dreaming and began
reciting "hodie si audieritis vocem meam.. " and asked him how it went on. He
continued .... . nollite obdurare corda vestra."
*1 In the beginning God created.
2 Today if ye will hear my voice.., harden not your hearts (Heb. 3:vii-viii).
Continuing on the same lines I said " nollite putare quoniarn veni solvere lege aut
prophet.. .", he completed it for me, "non veni solvere sed adimplere."~
I spoke to him later in English and Greek and he answered me m each language
perfectly. Not only was he a linguist, but it was obvious from what he said that he

was extremely erudite, giving dates and places of historical events and the names
of the principal figures involved. Only once in a while would his interpretation of
events be slightly at variance with our orthodox point of view.
English was the only language he appeared to have any difficulty with at all,
nevertheless his ability to discuss the most varied topics in that language amazed
me.
When we returned to the sitting-room I decided to try to find out what his
scientific knowledge was like; it is one thing to be able to discourse on history
and religion and to have the gift of languages, but it is quite another thing to be
able to talk on scientific subjects. Obviously when talking about science he should
not only show he possessed all the knowledge that we have, but he should also be
able to present something more advanced, If he could not do so, this would prove
him to be nothing more than an inhabitant of this planet. Nobody makes up
scientific theories on the spot unless he is a genius or unless they do not hold
water.
What is your name?" I asked him.
"I have no name in your sense of the word. On my planet names are a picture of the
character of the individual. Though them we know a person's merits and
shortcomings, even if he is unknown to us. Our names are based on a combination of
sounds which would be unintelligible to you, for whom one name is as good as
another. Today I have one name, and if tomorrow I should be wiser or better, I
should have a different one, and so on."
*3 Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to
destroy, but to fulfil (Matthew ~: xvii).
"I see. Well, tell me, then, where do you come from?"
"I come from a satellite of Jupiter."
"From which satellite?"
"Not from any one in particular. Sometimes I live on Ganymede, and sometimes on Io,
just as you move around from one city to another."
"But I have heard that men from other planets are diminutive, but you are tall-over
six foot How do you explain this?" I asked him with the object of embarrassing him.
"We are not all diminutive. On the same satellite we have men who are small or
large, white, black or dark. Earth men are generally tall, but there are also
pigmies and people of medium stature, and the white, the red, the dark and the
black. Nature reveals her unity in diversity."
"That is unimportant," I said. "One knows the leopard by its spots. You must be
aware of our prodigious efforts to make certain discoveries. We spend vast sums of
money on research, often without encouraging results.
I myself, as you can see from my books full of notes, do a lot of studying, but up
to the present, I cannot say that I have learned anything. I appear to be lost in a
tangle of equations, and the mere mention of a parameter in a calculation drives me
insane.

There is one problem, for example, which our best physicists and mathematicians
have worn themselves out on; it is one which I believe may be easy for you to
answer, whose science has conquered space for you. The problem is to know whether
it is energy or matter that exists in Nature. I would like to make it clear that I
shall not be satisfied with some simple academic definition, and shall require from
you a more detailed explanation, which you are obviously in a position to give. Can
you enlighten me?"
The captain of the flying saucer seemed to withdraw his thoughts to some distant
point, as though looking for some way of embarking on this subject in a simple
manner, or as if he were trying to listen to someone who was speaking to him
from the depths of his soul. Then he answered me slowly, weighing each word as he
said it
* * *
The object of this chapter is to explain to the reader how it was that we were able
to start off a conversation on the highest level with this captain of the flying
saucer. Therefore we would like to close it at this point and take up the thread
again in the next chapter.
In this new chapter we will try to exclude all the unimportant words that passed
between us, synthesising the whole conversation in the form of questions and
answers.
The following pages do not represent the fruits of a single conversation, but a
series of five meetings which took place as follows: Once in the flying saucer
itself, once in my home, twice in the main square in Sao Paulo, and the last at the
Roosevelt station in Sao Paulo. It is perhaps important to explain that the two
conversations we had in the main square took place in the presence of a professor
of physics and mathematics, who shall remain anonymous out of respect for his
present high position.
It is possible that some of the replies do not reflect the true spirit of the
captain, and owing to the time that has elapsed since some of the outlines may have
become blurred. However, we have preserved the essence of the replies, based on
notes made at the time.
We have also tried, in the part that deals with religion, to exclude anything which
could offend the viewpoint of existing Churches or sects. There is just one thing
we would like to state, as a matter of conscience. The difficulties we faced him
with concerning the Bible were fully explained by him. He gave us answers about the
creation of man, the resurrection of the body, the reason for human suffering,
etc., which fully confirm the truth of this book. For us his arguments were so
satisfying that we became Christians. It is possible, however,
that what appeared to be perfectly understandable to us may seem ridiculous to

others. We shall refrain from publishing these questions, unless we are pressed to
do so, for fear of prejudicing the main issue. With these reservations we shall now
proceed with the subjects that appear most interesting to us.

God, Matter and Energy, Chap. 2

A: Your question was badly formulated. You should first investigate the origin of matter
and energy, as both are expressions of something else which you see and feel, but are not
aware
Q: Are you referring to the ether?
A: No, I am certainly not referring to the ether. Ether only exists around planets for a
certain distance, and is nothing more than a type of matter. The etheric layers are
effects, not causes. Lacking the basic terms of reference, it is difficult for me to be
explicit. What I mean to say is that I lack the basic term of reference because you reason
in a different way. I do not know the appropriate terminology in your language.
Q: What particular terms are you referring to? Mathematical ones?
A: No, theological ones rather than mathematical.
Q: What have matter and energy to do with theology?
A: Man can only truly understand the phenomena of Nature when he understands the nature of
God.
Q: Well, I could never believe in the existence of God, for the very good reason that I
could not see what part He had to play in the Universe. If He existed, and reigned
eternally, He should play the leading role. But to me there never appeared to be any
arbitrary principle capable of influencing the general order of things, that could be
considered to be above everything that is; because matter, energy and the movement- of
bodies, in fact everything, seems to resolve itself into specific laws, mostly of a
mechanical order. It is up to you to tell me what He is, what is His nature, what He is
composed of, what are His attributes, how He acts and what influence He has on created
things; and also to prove to me that He is not a mere decorative figure. I do not wish to
be shown a God subject to mechanical laws, in whom I could never believe, but a supreme God
who is above any law. If He is subordinate to the law, that which subordinates Him is
superior, and if laws operate on Him, then the divine attributes belong to the laws, and
God becomes a mere subject. I am also subject to law, but I am not God.
A: There is a certain truth in your scepticism. I would also not be able to believe in a
God who is subject to anything or to the natural order. Law is nothing more than a
convention and presupposes a legislator. The Creator is above the thing created, so He is
the judge who judges the law. He is the lawgiving principle whenever lawgiving becomes
necessary for the good of creation, and for the maintenance of order. But creation itself
is above the law, because legal statutes are only made for its protection. It is useful for
the protection of created beings, but if instead of protecting them, it becomes oppressive,
the legislator has the power to modi4r it according to his discretion. God judges, and is
not judged on any question.
I would like to give you my views on God, giving you the simplest possible definition. God
is an isotropic' line parallel to itself and vibrating on itself at right angles. He is
like a system of axes in which the point of intersection of the lines is (isotropic: That
which exhibits equal physical actions in all directions. Light is a case in point.)
everywhere at the same time. Then He is many, because dimensions are contained within Him,
'when these are per-mutated-to use a terrestrial definition-" n" equals infinity. Please
remember that this is an attempt to explain, in human language, the unexplainable. On the
basis of this premise we can now go further and see how matter and energy were created.
Q: Did you say created?

A: I mean created because there was a time when they did not exist. If they had existed for
all eternity they would have coexisted with God and the Father could not have been the
Creator of something which was as eternal as He. God acted as a transformer and created
them. The "how's is what we shall study.
Your attention must have been drawn to an interesting peculiarity of electricity: if we

turn a rotor in a magnetic field formed by a magnet, we immediately get a flow of electrons
which move along the surface of the conductor. I myself used to wonder where these
electrons came from. They must have come from somewhere, but where?
They do not come from anywhere, they were generated within the magnetic field. How? They
are the result of a deformation brought about within the magnetic field by the movement of
the rotor.
Supposing we take this generator and enclose it in an airtight vessel, we still get a flow
of electrons as soon as we start the rotor turning, and if we had a pressure gauge inside
the vessel we would see that in spite of the large current flowing between the two
conductors, the atmospheric pressure would remain the same. This being the case, we can
define the electron as deformed magnetic space, propagated in wave form.
An eloquent proof that the electron is a wave form and not a particle is obtained by
refracting it through a spectrum.
There is an experiment that Earth scientists have done to prove this: a gamma ray (a gamma
ray is of electro-magnetic origin), when passing close to a nucleus, pulls an electron away
with it. It is true that the moment of inertia of the gamma ray is changed. To explain this
phenomenon they devised the rather thin hypothesis that the ray's acceleration was
transformed into energy, but it is absurd to believe that the moment of inertia of a vector
in space could be transformed into energy.
There is a relationship between energy and the force that imparts acceleration to a body,
but only a certain relationship. Water activates a turbine, but the gravitational force
which activated the water could never be turned into electrical energy.
All that happened then was that the rotor moved inside the generator and caused a
deformation of the magnetic space. The deformation that the points M' of the mass M of the
rotor brought about in the magnetic field corresponds to the force of gravity in the water
in a turbine.
If it is absurd to say that a vector moment creates energy, it would be even worse to say
that this moment generates matter, in other words that an electron is a particle. The only
rational explanation is that a gamma ray, being of electromagnetic origin, deformed itself
for an instant near the nucleus and from this deformation an electron was created which
must therefore be a charge of wave form.
Q: But if the gamma ray, on being deformed, does create electrical energy, it must have
come out of something, whose mass in turn must have been diminished.
A: The gamma ray lost nothing other than acceleration. That is to say it lost a certain
proportion of its frequency or its wave compression. Thus it could be said that if one put
obstacles consisting of nuclei in its path, we could create as many electrons as its
frequency allowed. As it happens, this system is used to a great extent by us in order to
obtain energy more about this later. In any case the alteration was brought about in the
space occupied by it at that moment.
Q: Your reasoning is very interesting. If one concedes that an electron is a wave form, how
can one reconcile this with the structure of an atom? How can waves rotate round a nucleus?
A: If waves cannot rotate round a nucleus, particles certainly cannot.(5)
The laws of physics are immutable. The first law of thermodynamics is called the Mechanical
Equivalent of Heat.(6)

A given quantity of energy is required for a body to carry out a given amount of work. When
this is exhausted, the mechanical movement of the body ceases.
However much energy an electron may have, it must be a limited amount of energy.
This being the case, an electron revolving round a nucleus would use up this energy in a
short time. However, this does not happen as the movement and stability of an electron in
its orbit is dependent neither on time nor thermodynamics.
Let us go further. If an electron were a particle, its high speed would make it fly off at
a tangent from the atom owing to its centrifugal force.
We must also bear in mind that a body, however much energy of its own it may have, does not
move unless an exterior force sets it in motion. If one charges a sphere with a
considerable amount of energy, it still does not move. Nevertheless if a force of i gr. is
applied to it, a corresponding impulse is transferred to the sphere.
All the intrinsic energy of an electron, supposing an electron to be a particle, would be

of no use to it unless there were an exterior force to impart acceleration to its mass.
As a wave form(7) however, an electron perpetuates its vibration within a field without
losing its characteristic wave structure. These wave structures have the property of moving
through a field, or remaining stationary within it. An electron is a stationary wave form
within an atom.(8)
Even Heisenberg felt that he could not account for all the electronic movements in an atom.
He saw that this minute electron seemed to be ubiquitous, appearing at all points in an
orbit at the same instant. Being unable to locate the point in space where it was to be
found at any given time, since it appeared at all points, he developed his "Uncertainty
Principle"(8)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
(*5) The scholar Antonio J. B. de Miranda, in his work The Theory of Photons (page 208),
states that if an electron were an homogeneous particle its speed of revolution around the
nucleus would be 268 times that of light, which science admits is impossible. And if we
were to consider an electron as a cylindrical particle, we would arrive at a speed 100
times that of light, On page 15 of the same work the author says "the problems of the
dimensions of the quantum have puzzled physicists. Transverse measurements taken by
producing bands of interference from parallel slits indicate that a quantum has a width of
about 6 metres; longitudinal measurements taken by producing interference by echelons down
to a microns indicate that the wavelength of a quantum is in the order of I metre.
(*6) The Mechanical Equivalent of Heat is the number of kilogramme/ metres required to
produce a calorie. Thus, a caloric is the amount of energy obtained from a body of one
kilogramme falling through 427 metres.
(*7) If photographic plates are bombarded by parallel streams of electrons, these

defractive images are produced. They appear as concentric rings. which shows that the
electron is a wave form.
(*8)If the electron is a wave form having its origin in space, the whole concept of modern
science would fall to the ground. It would contradict the principal argument of Planck's
theory which asserts that an electron is a particle whose energy is stepped up in "quantic
jumps.
It would also lead to the collapse of our conception of light and all the mechanics of
relativity.
(*9)The "Uncertainty Principle" exploded the scientific theory of determinism. This showed
that Nature, in isolated cases, acted in a completely arbitrary manner and did not conform

to, and appeared to be unaware of, any mathematical laws. Later, Dirac showed that the
concept of the Universe as a collection of measurable phenomena of constant and definite
form was possibly correct. He based this theory on the fact that these arbitrary phenomena
in the U eventually gave rise to a definite pattern. This was also the death of the laws of
cause and effect because it was not possible to conceive of identical effects originating
from different causes.
The physicists reasoned that if the basic phenomena are arbitrary that the
force which gives rise to these must also be arbitrary.
That force must therefore possess freedom of action in the widest sense of the word, and
act as it pleases apparently purposely unaware of the precision required by science, in
spite of the fact it showed this desired precision when the secondary effects which make up
the visible Universe were created from the primary phenomena.
In fact it appeared to the physicists that behind the laws of physical phenomena there was
an Intelligence with well-defined aims, infallibly arriving at the same result using
different means to do so every time. Thus we reached a point where we could state that the
principal cause of phenomena is an Intelligence, and that these phenomena which we believe
to be causes are nothing more than effects, or in other words, accidents appertaining to a
substance which in its entirety gives rise to the visible Universe.
(*10) orbits K-L-M are those in which electrons are believed to revolve round a nucleus.
"In reality the action of short radio waves on television brings about various effects,
e.g. the transformation of positive into negative; the superimposition of extraneous
images; multi-colour effect in the form of bands; outside interference; the reception of
distant foreign stations; and the appearance of unknown human forms. These phenomena only
occur when ultra short waves and television sets with anti-magnetic circuits are used.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Thus the so-called orbits K-L-M'0 are nothing but stationary electrical waves in the field
of the atom, each having its particular wave structure and frequency. It is known that
waves of varying length do not interfere with one another as is shown by radio, even though
'they occupy the same area of space. In this peculiarity of an electron, there is a vast
field waiting to be opened up for the benefit of man in almost all branches of knowledge.
As an electron has a variable wave form, its characteristics are in consequence virtually
unlimited.
If, for example, you connect up your television and set up interference by means of short
radio waves, you will see how this inverts the image. If still shorter waves are used, even
more interesting phenomena occurs, Thus, if it is possible to deform the sweep of electrons
which form the television picture, to completely inverse their characteristics, making
white appear as black and black appear as white, then it is evident that such an effect
could never be produced by a particle."
If we do not regard an electron as a wave form, there is no explanation for molecular

cohesion.
Q: There is, however, something that is not clear to me. You say a body or particle cannot
move indefinitely through space without losing its energy. On the other hand you say that
all bodies require a force to impart acceleration to them. Using Newton's laws of physics
that all bodies can be considered points in space, and taking for the moment the Earth as a
simple particle, we get two movements which are contrary to your theory: the first is the
rotation of the Earth, and the second is our planet's revolution in orbit.
A: Quite. The case of the Earth is quite different and quite simple. The analogy that
physicists wish to see between movements of stars and planets and the movement within the
atom is false. In the atom we have stationary waves in a state of permanent vibration;
Earth is a body impelled by constant force. Even if Earth had no energy of its own, it

would still move through space.
This phenomenon is the same as that which occurs in a radiometer. In this apparatus the
blades are subject to a potential difference, the black sides absorb sunlight, and begin to
rotate around their axis. The intensity of the movement depends upon the intensity of the
sunlight that the black faces are able to retain (see Fig. I).
Earth also, having one hemisphere in sunlight and the other in darkness, is subject to a
difference of potential or, more specifically, a binary potential difference, and turns
about its axis. It should be noted that in the radiometer the atmospheric pressure inside
the bulb needs to be low, otherwise the blades will not rotate. Earth also, in the upper
layers of its atmosphere, has this low pressure, extending almost to a vacuum. It was a
good thing you mentioned the rotation of the Earth, because later when we talk about its
movement in orbit, this knowledge will be invaluable to us.
So, to continue the explanation of how rotation arises, I can tell you that this phenomenon
will be one of the difficulties which will face you when you come to make interplanetary
voyages-that is if, 'with the way things are going in the world, you get as far as that.
FIG I RADIOMETER.
This little apparatus gives an idea of the movement of the Earth. The vanes are painted
black on one side and white on the other. Solar energy is absorbed by the black faces,
which gives rise to a difference of potential and causes the vanes to rotate on their axis.
(*12) Airmen who make parachute descents from a great height get into violent spins and are
only able to control this movement when they reach the denser layers of the atmosphere.
There is, however, quite a simple solution to this problem. if a body rises to a certain
height above the Earth, thus reducing the atmospheric pressure on it, the body at once
begins to rotate?' This is due to one side of the body receiving more light and heat than
the other. The remedy lies in balancing out the difference and supplying light and heat to
the colder side.
From this you can see that the phenomena of Nature are simple, all resolving themselves
into readily understandable laws which need very little analysis or understanding. This is
what we are trying to prove in the question of electrons.
Having satisfied ourselves on this point, we will leave the explanation of the revolution
of the Earth in orbit round the Sun until later, so as to keep to the point. We will now
see how things are created in the Universe out of nothing.
We said that God, being an isotropic line, can be regarded as a system of axes, from which

an infinite number of lines go out in all directions. As the centre of this axis is
everywhere, we can regard the whole Universe as its centre.
The fact that the lines of force are consequently unable to escape from the ubiquitous
centre and are always encompassed by the Being of God, makes Him an Immanent figure.
Thus, if the lines cannot move out from the Being of God, they can only move within it. But
as there is no such thing as interior or exterior, the whole Universe being a centre of
lines of force, all the lines resulting from the isotropism of God will be found to be
oscillating on one point.
We may therefore call the Universe a point of infinite osci1lation.~~ We have already shown
that superimposition of lines of force on a certain point constitutes a deformation of
space.
If this definition of the Universe is correct, God is an oscillating charge superimposed on

an infinite point, constantly causing a deformation of space, continually exerting its
influence on the un manifest, and automatically creating energy, and in consequence,
matter. If God did not exist, nothing whatsoever would exist.
I could continue this proof up to a high level, but people not used to these heights might
suffer from dizziness. Let us be satisfied with this for the moment.
(*13) Science made a great step forward when Newton regarded all bodies
mere points. Thus all the points M' of a body were taken as a single
were to regard universes as points instead of scattered masses,
we might get somewhere.
This continual creation of energy in the Universe gives rise to an internal pressure in
the nebulae which can be seen in the phenomenon known as "the flight of the nebulae."14 As
a result of this internal pressure they move away from one another.
You may raise the objection that this pressure is also applied in the direction of flight
so that the internal pressure coupled with the external one would make them stable and they
would not move apart, which would cause their mass to condense. My answer to this would be
that energy created outside a galaxy tends to be drawn into the galaxy, condensing itself
into material form. Thus we have an internal pressure coupled with an external
decompression.
The flight of the nebulae prevents condensation taking place for three reasons:
(i) This movement causes the interior pressure to disappear.
The flight of the nebulae is a well-known phenomenon, where they appear to fly away from
each other, moving out from a hypothetical centre. Various theories have been put forward.
An interesting one is one suggesting that this flight might he a pure periodic movement,
and that the nebulae will later return to the point of departure. This might be described
as a sistolic and diastolic movement of the Universe. The most generally accepted theory
is, however, that of Father LeMaitre who thought that the Universe, many millions of years
ago, was an immense radioactive atom which, at a certain point, became completely
disintegrated, the nebulae being fragments of this original atom. His theory, however,
brought serious difficulties in its wake for if we all originate from one single "atom,"
all bodies in Nature should be of the same age. However, it is known that things did not
happen that way, celestial bodies are of different ages. On the other hand, there could
have been no disintegration if external factors had not upset the internal movement. If
such external factors had indeed existed, the "radioactive atom" would not have been the
only thing in existence and the Universe could thus not have begun in this manner.

It is strange that a priest should be able to conceive of a system so completely different

from that revealed by the Church, a system which was born of an accident in Nature and
appears to leave out the question of an Intelligence acting as a superior power directing
all activity.
However, nebulae appear to maintain an acceleration caused by an internal pressure within

the Universe.
(2) As the nebulae move apart, that space which had been transformed into matter
endeavours to return to its former state of primordial space in accordance with the law of
rotation of masses in a magnetic field. This reconstitutes the energy that had been used
for condensation of the matter, turning it into light, whose wave energy goes on decreasing
until the moment of entropy is reached. This is what takes place on the Sun. Leaving aside
the reaction that they bring about on the planets, the Sun's discharges into space are, in
a sense, matter returning to its original state of primordial space.
(3) Light repels magnetic fields. Light from a myriad of suns in the various galaxies
produces a very great force of repulsion on all the nebulae, and under this pressure they
move away from one another. We shall have more to say about this force of repulsion later.
In the first instance God supplied the power that brings about the deformation of space
and the Sun, by an opposite process, turns it back into energy, thus re-establishing the
balance. Everything comes from God and everything returns to Him.
That is why neither matter nor energy exist, but only deformed space, which is called
matter, and what you call energy is nothing more than a phenomenon of transition between
primordial space and deformed space.
Q: I assure you, my friend, that we have no means of refitting your theory, and your
explanation fascinates me. However, God is spirit. If He can create matter, can it be said
that all spirits can deform space and create also.
A: Not all of them. Only the Creator, whose nature is different. Spirits are created, and
therefore in some degree manifest, but God is the Unmanifest. We are spirits but not of the
nature of God. The Father is the generator of energy, and the spirits are merely a form of
energy, albeit a different form to that found in matter.
A spirit can create to a certain extent, just as we ourselves can, within limits, deform
space,create and destroy. But there are limits to the things we can create. No spirit can
create another spirit, for example. That would be beyond its power, but nothing is beyond
the power of God. Not only can He create matter, energy and spirit, as He did, but He also
created others who have a nature akin to His own. These are His Sons, let us give homage to
them; they are of a similar nature to Him, and are sources of life and have the power to
deform space.
Life does not belong to us, and if we were to dissociate ourselves from God, we would die
spiritually. But these other beings who are of a similar nature to the Father constitute
with Him a single unit, in themselves eternal.
Q: You said you were going to talk about the movement of the Earth in orbit. I would like
to hear about that.
A: The Earth's movement through space is partly a result of its rotation. Note, however,
that I said partly, because in order to explain it fully there is one other thing in
connection with the Sun that needs to be studied: Terrestrial science states that the Sun
is the centre of the planetary system, which is not the case. The Milky Way is a vast
magnetic field, but a magnetic field contains within itself secondary fields. Earth, for
example, is a magnetic field, within a field of our system, which in turn is a field within
the Milky Way. Earth with its poles also has its secondary fields, which the people of
Earth have unfortunately not yet discovered.(*15)
(15) Many scientists already suspect that there may be other magnetic centres on Earth,

independent of other know poles. Thee Dutch have put a lot of research into this question.
Herschel and Newton mathematically proved the existence of our magnetic field, within which
the Sun and the planets move, when they discovered that the point of equilibrium of the
solar system lay at a distance from the Sun equal to three times its diameter, due to the
proportion of 1 to 700 in the relative mass of the planets to that of the Sun. It is round
this point of equilibrium that the Sun moves.
It is wrong to say that matter attracts matter in the direct ratio of mass and in the
inverse of the square of distance. Matter having undergone atomic interaction has no
influence on other matter at a distance. However, magnetic fields attract or repel one
another, and matter can be attracted by a magnetic field. A force of attraction is exerted
on the Earth by this magnetic point of equilibrium of our system, which we may call "point
zero."
While being attracted by this point. Earth is being repelled by the light from the Sun; its
orbit round the Sun represents the balance between these two actions of attraction and
repulsion.17
Q: Repelled by the light of the Sun?
A: Yes, repelled. The same force of repulsion that makes nebulae fly apart affects Earth
and the rest of the planets. Has the weight of light not been measured? What is it but a
pressure constantly exerted upon matter? If the Sun exerted attraction its light would not
have weight, but a contrary effect.(18)
I told you that light is deformed space turning itself back '
(16) According to science this point is where the equilibrium of the masses
is to be found, due to the movement of the planets around space. The Sun appears to revolve
round this point. Given the form of the terrestrial orbit, if the Sun made a revolution
round this point of equilibrium its movement should also take 365 days, equal to that of
Earth.
(17) Newton showed that if Earth were to be only very slightly attracted, its orbital
movement would become spiral and it would finish by colliding with the Sun. However, as yet
it is difficult to calculate the action of these forces because we have not had, until the
present time, a satisfactory mathematical solution to the problem of the three bodies.
(18) The weight of light is equal to 410 of atmospheric pressure per square mile. If the
captain of the flying saucer is correct, this pressure of light will be greater on the
upper atmosphere. As long ago as 1873 Maxwell showed that radiation exerts a pressure.
Lebedev and Nichols discovered the same thing.
I told you that light is deformed space turning itself back into primordial space. The
meeting of these two conditions of space causes quite a marked pressure (see Fig. 2)
Now, a body in space can only be in a state of equilibrium if two contrary forces meet to
support it. If there were only a force of attraction without a corresponding one of
repulsion, the planet would move towards the point of attraction.19
I have already shown you that if the repulsion were caused solely by centrifugal force, the
planet would slowly spiral in, towards the source of attraction.
Earthly mathematics themselves confirm this. Without the repulsive force of the Sun, there
would, however, be no circular movement. There would be neither axial rotation nor orbital

revolution. A body impelled in one direction only does not move in another direction.
How could Earth move in orbit in a different direction to this repulsive force? Surely a
thrust from one direction cannot give rise to another at right angles to itself?
In order to understand the phenomenon of revolution we must regard the true diameter of the
planet not as that of its solid mass, but as the sum of its solid and gaseous parts.
The true diameter can be obtained from the following formula:
Terrestrial radius x speed of revolution
--------------------------------
Speed of rotation of the globe (= 407,200 km.).
Your planet rotates on its axis at 1,660 km. per hour, and revolves in its orbit at 1o6,ooo
km. per hour. This gives a value of 407,200 km. for the radius of the total gaseous
envelope. If we subtract from this figure the radius of the Earth (6,378 km.) we see that
the terrestrial ether extends 400,822 km. beyond the solid surface of the planet (see Fig.
3).
The Moon, then, lies within the fringes of the etheric covering, so that the various
phenomena connected with it take place within this covering.
The etheric covering acts as a fulcrum by virtue of which
(*19) in mathematics a body in space only has equilibrium when two contrary forces act upon
it, whose result equals zero.
Fig. 2. FORCES WHICH MAINTAIN EARTH IN SPACE.
Earth is simultaneously attracted by the magnetic centre of the system and repelled by the
light of the Sun. According to the captain of the flying saucer, this light repels the
magnetic field of Earth in the same way as a ray of light from a star is repelled and so
deflected on approaching the magnetic centre of our system.

The movement of the Earth in orbit is the result of its speed of rotation and the extent of
its etheric covering, which acts as a supporting medium allowing it to revolve under the
action of the two simultaneously opposing forces.
Its orbit round the magnetic centre is not eccentric because the Sun moves round the centre
in the same time that the Earth takes to move round the Sun. Thus the orbits of the planets
are affected whenever the come into conjunction with or p ass through opposition to the Sun
and the magnetic centre, causing both their speed of rotation and velocity in orbit to
increase or decrease.
The greater deflection of light near the poles causes a drop intemperatur4 whereas at the
Equator a strong concentration of light gives more heat. The elliptical orbits of the
planets are yet another consequence of the interaction
of the two forces. If the magnetic centre lies between a planet and the Sun, the force of
attraction is predominant and the planet is drawn in. However, if the Sun is between the
planet and the centre, the force of repulsion predominates and the planet moves out, its
path disturbed. As the position of the Sun changes in relation to the "point zero" centre,
each successive aphelion and perihelion of a planet occurs in a different position.
the two opposing forces of attraction and repulsion are able to act upon the Earth.
This gives us 814,400 km. as the effective overall diameter of the planet. The whole moves
with an angular velocity, supported by the opposing forces, upon a given plane. It is moved
in its orbit just as a turning wheel moves forward over the ground.
We see, then, that the same force which causes rotation, moves the body through space. In
the case of Earth, the rotational force is applied to the solid surface at a distance of
6,378 km. from the axis, but the effect of its movement through space occurs at 407,200 km.
from the axis, at which point the surface of the etheric covering attains a speed of
io6,ooo km. per hour.
Having explained this, we can understand why planets of large volume are situated at a
considerable distance from the Sun. By taking note of their distance from the Sun and their
volume, we can discover their true density, and this will also give us the magnetic force
of its poles. Thus the planet Jupiter is of low density and, having a large diameter, it is
more subject to the force of repulsion than that of attraction.(*20) If it were true that
matter attracted matter in direct proportion to the mass of the bodies, Jupiter, with a
volume 1,330 tunes greater than Earth and 331 times as much mass, should be much closer to
the Sun than Earth is.
Once the speed of rotation of a planet and its velocity in orbit are known, we can work out
the extent of its gaseous envelope. This cannot generally be observed by telescope.

You will see from the foregoing why celestial bodies move in elliptical orbits. The problem
involves the movement of three bodies, and terrestrial mathematics have not yet found any
suitable equation to solve this problem involving eighteen unknown factors.
If no suitable solutions have been found to problems involving three bodies, imagine an
equation involving the whole solar system with eight, nine or ten bodies, and the number of
unknown factors to which this would give rise.
However, there is a solution and it is easy to prove. The problem becomes complicated by
the amount of self-luminosity that each planet has.
Q: Self-luminosity? Then the planets have light of their own?
A: Every body in rotation, surrounded by atmosphere, has some light of its own. Earth has
what scientists call the " permanent aurora." It is a greenish light, found in the higher
(*20)The density given by science to the various heavenly bodies( is:
Mercury 6.2; Venus 5; Earth 5.5 Mars 3.8; Jupiter 1.36; Saturn 0.07; Uranus 1.3; Neptune
1.2; Pluto unknown. (Based on density of water= 1.)
layers, invisible to the naked eye.(21)" It is the result of discharges from the poles in
the upper atmosphere, where hydrogen, sodium and oxygen are to be found. The intensity of
this light depends upon the atmospheric composition and on the speed of rotation of each
planet. A body rotating in space, being immersed in the magnetic field of the solar system,
acts like a dynamo, generating a certain degree of electricity. The intensity of its poles
depends upon the rotation of its mass. In this case we take the diameter, the mass, the
distance between the poles, and the atmospheric composition of the planet, and make the
equation.
These equated elements will give us the intensity of the discharge and in consequence the
amount of self-generated light, which in turn modifies the actual movements of rotation and
revolution in orbit. Therefore, rotation is the result of the distance of the planet from
the Sun, the overall diameter it presents to the Sun, its mass and the satellites which
throw their light on its surface; less its own self generated light.
This also includes the Aurora Borealis, the explanation of which has given so much trouble
to your scientists. Its intensity is due to the proximity of the magnetic and geographical
poles.
Q: Is there any concrete proof that light repels matter?
A: There are several proofs. For example:
(1) A comet approaching the Sun becomes flattened.
(2) Light is deflected when it comes into contact with a magnetic field (it is not
deflected by mass). An electron, passing through a magnetic field, is also deflected.
(3) The planet Jupiter, when closest to the Sun, is able to exert a pressure upon it which
moves it from its position.
(4) Light has weight and gives rise to friction.
(*21)"The permanent aurora is also known by physicists as "air glow." It may be found at a
height of 150 km.
(5) Solar light causes barometric pressure.
(6) In aphelion the planets move at slower speeds.

(7) The pressure of sunlight upon Mercury pushes it 23 million km. away from the Sun.
One could quote other proofs, but we will leave these aside as we have not yet discussed
other phenomena.
Shortly, people of Earth will have other problems to solve. if up to the present you have
been unable to solve problems involving three bodies, there will soon be a greater
difficulty with the entry into our system of another Sun. There will then be four bodies
instead of three, that is to say, the Earth, the two Suns and the magnetic centre.
Q: I do not understand you. What is this other Sun that will form part of our system?
A: That is what I want to explain to you. Another Sun will soon enter our solar system, and
we shall be lucky enough to have a system of binary Suns. This is, in effect, one of the
reasons, apart from conveying greetings to you, why this meeting is taking place; the other
is to warm you of the dangers to which you are exposed with the advent of the atomic age.
Q: Yes, I would like to know what dangers we are laying ourselves open to with the advent
of the atomic age, but first I would like to hear more about this new Sun.
A: It is a body of monstrous proportions which will shortly become visible in the direction
of Cancer. It will not, however, emit any light as the light of a Sun only becomes intense
when it enters into a secondary magnetic field such as our solar system. It begins to
rotate on entering such a field. It deforms space around itself and generates currents
which give rise to its brilliance, if it were luminous beforehand, its light would set up a
force of repulsion, and it would be deflected from its path. With no luminosity it becomes
subject to the pressure of our Sun, but its own momentum will ensure that it enters our
system.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note from the web master
It is interesting to note as of may 1999 a comet matching this description has been
observed by an Australian amateur astronomer's at a star party and is believed not behaving
in a way a normal comet should.
It is rumoured the military are a little nervous about this object and newspaper coverage
at this time August 1999 has been lacking.
More detials can be read in The Australian New times magazine Nexus July August 1999 volume
6 number 5 or check out the following website www.millengroup.com
Photos of this object are of a greeny blue in colour at the moment.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
It will first be seen as a reddish light, later turning to blue. After reaching the area of
the large planetary bodies, it will encounter the repulsive force of the Sun, but in its
rear it will then have the weight of large bodies, also imparting a force of repulsion to
it in the opposite direction. The force of repulsion of the planets behind it, the light it
gives off and its great mass will cause the present Sun to move further away from the
magnetic centre of our system. Then the two Suns will settle down in their new orbits, the
one of greater mass and lesser light being nearer the centre 22 (see Fig. 4).
Two Suns in the solar system will create difficult problems. The orbits of all the planets
will be changed. Mercury will move into the area between the present orbits of Venus and
the Earth. Venus will move out to a position between the present orbit of the Earth and
Mars. The Earth will feel the effect before the new Sun settles down in its definitive

orbit. As the luminosity of this body increases, the pressure of this light will cause the
Moon to move out of its orbit, and it will settle in a position that will turn it into a
planet. With this displacement it will take with it part of the etheric mass of the Earth,
which will impart to it a stabilised movement. The Earth, in turn, under the pressure of
the twin Suns, will move out into the area now occupied by the planetoids. In short, there
will be a general displacement of all the bodies belonging to 'our system. Pluto will be
ejected from the system, and will wander though space until it finds some new haven.
(*22) And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord God, that I will cause the sun
to go down at noon and I will darken the Earth in the clear day (Amos 8: ix).
FIG. 4. A Binary System.
The entry of a new Sun into our system would throw the Earth out into an orbit between Mars
and Jupiter now occupied by the planetoids. All the planetary orbits will be altered. There
will be turmoil1 but this will be bearable as the repulsive force of the new Sun will
speedily restore order. When the new Sun reaches it maximum luminosity the Earth will
already be in its appointed place in the system. There will certainly be a change in the
fauna, but life will continue, probably under better conditions than before.
The entry of this new body into the system was predicted by Nostradamus in his famous
Centuries, vol II, stanza 4r:
"La grande estoile par sept jours bruslera
Nuee fera deux soleils apparoir."
(The great star will bum or seven days, and cloud will make two Suns appear.)
One of the satellites of Mars will be torn from its present orbit and thrown into space.
As it is a relatively dense body, it will be attracted towards the centre of the system
rather than repelled outwards. Its trajectory will be such that it will become a satellite
of the Earth. Everything depends on its direction of travel when it establishes contact

with this planet. If this happens to be against the direction of rotation of the Earth, the
shock produced by its contact with the etheric covering of the Earth will smash it to
pieces; if it is with the rotation of the Earth, then the satellite will attach itself to
the planet.
The Earth itself will not be affected by this impact, as its etheric covering will protect
it. According to our calculations, a shower of rocks is all that will reach the surf ace of
the planet; principally in the area of Europe and North Africa, Asia Minor, the north of
South America and the south of North America. The impact will turn this now splendid
Martian satellite into fragments weighing about 50 lb. each, which will lay waste these
areas. After that, everything will become normal again and we shall have a new sky in which
to travel, and you will have a new Earth.
Q: When will this take place? In the distant future?
A: It will be very soon, towards the end of this century. The Earth will begin its new
millennium with a new source of light to illuminate it. Many people will vanish forever
from the face of the Earth but a small community, obedient to the laws of God, will remain,
and present suffering will cease. There will be peace and abundance, justice and
compassion. The unjust souls will get the punishment they deserve, and the just will get
their recompense. On this day, many will understand the triumph of the just and he will see
why God did not immediately punish the wrongdoers. The Sun which is to come will be called
the Sun of Justice. Its appearance in the heavens will be the warming signal of the coming
of the One who will shine even more than the Sun itself.
Q: What has the arrival of the flying saucers on Earth to do with the Sun that is to come?
A: We are studying all the effects that its appearance will bring in its wake. If we were
permitted, we could, with suitable apparatus, send electromagnetic pulses against it, and
prevent its entry into our system by causing it to become incandescent outside our system.
However, to prevent its arrival would be tantamount to opposing the will of God and
allowing the injustice that eiists here to continue indefinitely. Those with clear
consciences and those at peace with their Creator need fear nothing. Let it come.
We came here for purposes of study but also to make a desperate appeal to man to avoid the
catastrophe and to live in peace. The Earth is not the centre of the planetary system. as
was previously believed, but the centre of evil. If man were to reform himself, it is
possible that the Creator would have compassion on him. Avoid war, because man can thereby
destroy his planet with his own hands without the intervention of the forces of Nature. It
is not difficult to be good; it is sufficient to do no evil. God will do the rest.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
DETAILS OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM ACCOUDING TO THEORETEICAL DATA
FURNISHED BY THE CAPTAIN OF THE FLYING SAUCUER
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Planets Diameter Period of Speed of Velocity etheric
Rotation Rotation in orbit covering
Miles hr min mph mph miles
Mecury 3025 23 412 107700 392500
Venus 7700 16 31 1465 78750 200500

Earth 7970 23 59 1040 66250 253500
Mars 4160 24 37 530 54000 197250
Jupiter 87390 9 50 28000 29500 10
Saturn 71025 10 2 22000 21800 no atmospheric ether
Uranus 29625 10 50 8560 15300 11530
Neptune 27050 15 10 5435 12225 16750
Pluto 7300 19 57 1230 10660 60500

Overcoming Gravity, Chap. 3

Q: Have you any objection to telling us about the problems of navigation in flying
saucers?
A: None at all. It is obvious that interplanetary voyages will not be possible for
people of Earth for some time to come, but we will give them a helping hand by
showing you what takes place.
The atmospheric pressure on Earth is 1.033 kg. per sq. cm. If a sheet of paper is
placed over the mouth of a glass full of water and turned upside down, the
atmospheric pressure on the paper will prevent the water from being subject to the
force of gravity and spilling out of the glass.
We use this natural atmospheric pressure in the flying saucer. It is this which
gives us the necessary propulsive force.
If we maintain this pressure underneath the saucer and bring about a decompression
on top, the craft will be given a terrific upward thrust which no known force can
match.
Q: Please be more explicit, I do not quite understand the system you describe.
A: It is quite simple, my friend. We create a vacuum in the direction of travel. If

we have low pressure on one side, the other side is subject to the full atmospheric
pressure. Any object, whatever its nature, can only be moved if some difference of
energy potential is created. For example, with a saucer of 20 m. diameter, we get
pir radius cubed= 3,141,600 sq. cm. as the surface of the saucer.
With an atmospheric pressure of 1.033 kg. per sq. cm. we can calculate that the
force operating on a saucer of 20 m. diameter is equal to 3,278,272.8 kg.
This gives you some idea of what is involved, even, the smallest type of saucer
develops a thrust of approximately 3 million kg., whereas even your most powerful
aeroplanes cannot develop more than a few thousand kilogrammes of thrust.

FIG. 5. Saucer in horizontal flight.
By maintaining the vacuum in the direction of its flight, the saucer can move at
any speed and without creating any friction with the atmosphere. It is also very
easy to manoeuvre, since this vacuum can be moved in any direction. The atmospheric
pressure developed on a saucer of 65 ft. diameter is over 3,000 tons; in the case
of a saucer 'with a diameter of 200 ft. the pressure developed would be some 30,000
tons. This, therefore, is a tremendous source of power, unequalled by any other
natural phenomenon.
For those who are interested in communication with the spirits of the departed, we
quote below an extract from the Spiritualist Review of 1859, which 'was translated
into Portuguese and incorporated into a publication entitled Poitevin the aeronaut.
At that time the possibility of reaching other planets by balloon was being
investigated so in this book Allan Kardec invokes the spirit of Poitevin, ~
balloonist, and asks him about the future of this type of craft
Poitevin predicted that there was no great future for balloons, and that they were
not suitable for space travel; later he went on to describe how a suitable craft
might be constructed. "You did not ask me whether you would be able to visit other
planets by this means. But this problem has given much food for thought, and its
solution would fill your 'world 'with 'wonder. No, you will not succeed by this
means.
You can imagine how long it would take to traverse the inconceivable vastness of
space, when it takes light several years to travel the millions of millions of
leagues, even if we were carried there by wind or steam But to get back to the main
subject, I told you at the beginning that you should not expect too much from the
present system, but that you will achieve far more by utilising the high and
permanent pressure of the air. The fulcrum that you seek is always before you and
encloses you on every side. You run up against it in your every move, it hinders
your flight and acts on everything you touch. Meditate well on this and work on
this revelation as much as you can, the possibilities are enormous."
Otto de Guericke was the first to notice the tremendous pressure of the atmosphere.
It was in 1654 that he tried to pull two hemispheres apart in which he had created
a vacuum. Not even the strength of sixteen horses could achieve this. Before this
he had seen atmospheric pressure crush a copper boiler in which the pressure was
low like a piece of paper. The movement of the air in the upper layers of the
atmosphere supports this incredible pressure; if it were not for these we would be
crusted by the volume of gas above us.
A great danger hangs over the Earth as a result of atomic explosions; the
disturbance of these upper layers can cause torrential rainstorms, hurricanes and
an unbelievable increase in the atmospheric pressure and in the intensity of solar
radiation.
Saucers do not cancel out gravity, as was at first thought, but they derive their
power from the atmospheric pressure itself.
This is why many people have been told that their source of energy was Nature
herself. If saucers cancelled out gravity, they would only be able to move in one
direction, and would still need a propellant to supply the power. Even supposing
they did overcome gravity this way, they would still possess a certain 'weight in
relation to the air, and the ensuing friction with the atmosphere 'would limit
their speed considerably.

It should, therefore, be perfectly feasible to construct a saucer on Earth. Its

covering could be made of any material, as there 'would be no friction with the
atmosphere. They could be any shape although the saucer shape is the ideal one,
since one half can take the full force of the atmospheric pressure, while the other
is immersed in a vacuum. The speed and manoeuvrability of a cube shaped craft would
be impaired owing to air resistance on its sides, which would consequently be
subject to friction.
The saucer could not be fitted with glass windows, since the difference of pressure
at various points of their surface would break them, which would create havoc
inside the saucer. The saucer's "eyes" consist of television apparatus paced at
various points on the outside of the craft, which relay to a screen in front of the
pilot. This screen covers all directions simultaneously, and is therefore better
than the human eye which can only take in a certain angle of vision at one time.
Unfortunately a craft of this type could be used in war, but it would also
revolutionise our transport systems if it could be constructed on Earth. Distance
would not be a factor, ships and trucks could be dispensed with, as loading and
unloading could take place anywhere without having to build special landing fields.
In a standard transport saucer, this pressure would be much greater. With a craft
of room. diameter, we would get a thrust of 78,540,000 kg. and with one of 200 m.
diameter the thrust would be 314,160,000 kg.
There is no limit to the size or capacity of these craft. We construct big cargo
carriers up to 600 m. diameter with a payload of almost 300 million kg.

This is more or less "theoretical because we never use the whole cargo carrying
capacity of these giant freighters. If we did so, we would not have sufficient
force available to develop high speeds.
When we undertake any interplanetary journey we use a low capacity craft. The size
depends on the object of the visit. Generally saucers with a diameter of 20 metres
are the handiest. These craft, fully equipped, weigh 250,000 kg. The total capacity
of this craft would be 3 million kilos, but we use this margin of power to enable
us to operate at high speeds.
A ship could never develop energy on this scale, not even atomic energy can compare
with the forces of Nature. And Nature does it without poisoning the atmosphere! Is
it clear to you now?
Q: I understand. What an extraordinarily simple process!
A: Yes, it is simplicity itself. It is just a question of knowing how. But it would

not be complete unless I told you how we set about creating a vacuum externally.
First I will explain to you how the saucer is steered. We can move this vacuum in.
any direction. Course is set by operating an ordinary lever on a hemispherical
mounting which moves the vacuum in the required direction. If we wish it to go in a
particular direction, we produce a vacuum on that side of the saucer, and
immediately the atmosphere produces a pressure on the opposite side pushing us in
the direction of the vacuum. Let us imagine that we are moving in level horizontal
flight, if we wish to make a right-angled turn, all we have to do is move the
vacuum to the top, or to one of the other sides, and we shall move at the same
speed in the new direction. We can change direction abruptly and do not need to
describe curves. Do you understand now?
Q: Yes, I see the whole import of it. This can revolutionise all our concepts of
aerial navigation. It is a diabolical piece of machinery.
A:It depends on the use to which it is put. I stlll have faith in humanity and
promise that if one day you can agree to abolish war, I will personally come and
help you achieve these results, and other more important ones. I shall teach you
how to make life a paradise.
But as I was saying, we create a vacuum and, to use your words, a "diabolical"
thrust. Friction, however, does not arise as we are always moving into a vacuum.
And without friction the craft does not heat up. We often need extra heating to
keep ourselves warm, because the vacuum causes a drop in temperature.
There are no technical difficulties involved in producing an external vacuum. You

know that cathode rays have the strange property of decomposing the atmosphere
through which they pass. Under the action of these rays, the elements of the
atmosphere revert to their etheric state. In addition to this we make cathode rays
intersect the anode rays at an angle of 45 degrees. This we achieve by using high
voltage and current.
Q: Where is the cathode ray apparatus situated?
A: All over the peripheral area. That is to say, the whole of the outer edge of the
craft acts as a cathode ray emitter. These rays are deadly and can only be
projected outwards. If a human being were to be exposed to rays as powerful as the
ones we use, his cells would be destroyed, and he would suffer lethal burns.

But inside the craft there is less radioactivity than in the air that is breathed
on Earth.
The coloration that saucers appear to give off in flight is caused by these rays,
the same thing happens in a Crookes or Geissler tube. They are a result of the low
pressure or vacuum that we create. If we wish to go very fast, we use an absolute
vacuum, and move through space in a flash. At other times, we use a semi-vacuum,
and we move more slowly. The intensity of the vacuum is proportional to the current
used and is controlled by a rheostat. If we want to follow an undulating course we
use a pulsing current.
When we are using a semi-vacuum, you observe a luminosity around us at night; but
if we are using an absolute vacuum we become invisible because light does not exist
in a vacuum." This is the reason why people always say that we appear to be
stationary and suddenly vanish and appear in another spot.
I must admit that other methods are also used, such as the bismuth system, which is
still used on some craft to set up a difference of energy potential, in fact this
was the system we used to use at first. (The captain described this other process
to us, but as it was a complex one we would rather not repeat it here.)
After having travelled around for some time in these bismuth crates, a Being from
another planet explained to us how to use a simpler method. Now they are only used
for space travel by enthusiasts as a kind of sport, just as you still use sailing
boats.
That, my friend, is how you can make a craft as fast as, or even faster than, a
flash of lightning.
(*23) A diminution of the pressure in cathode ray tubes causes the light in them
to disappear. Light therefore is an atmospheric effect, and if it were possible for
us to live in a vacuum we would be in darkness.
Q:I filly accept the explanation you have given Of course, a craft which could
create an external vacuum should have great manoeuvrability; motive power and
payload. It appears to me, however, that this system would not be very good for
getting away from the Earth. It is easy to manoeuvre as long as there is
atmospheric pressure. But at a certain height, unless our calculations are
basically wrong, this pressure goes down to nothing. I would like you to talk
frankly about the method you use to escape from the Earth, because what you have
told us so far is only part of the answer.
A: You are forcing me to elucidate a vital point, which I would have preferred not
to tell you. Once you know this, we shall no longer have any security and would run
serious risks due to man's innate love of conquest. But no one can refuse to tell
the truth when he is asked. I will tell you everything, but you must promise to
keep secret the means by which we produce this force.
Q: Does this mean that I am not to tell it to other people?
A: Of course. If there were nothing in what I have to tell you I would not be
imposing conditions. But you must use your own judgment. I cannot forbid you
passing on to others information which could contribute to the well-being of the
community. But I insist that the information that I give you concerning means of
destruction must be kept for yourself only. What I want to tell you could bring
destruction even to us as it would make it possible for you to reach our homeland.
The menace that hangs over the world as a result of human technological development

would be upon us, and it might turn men into devils. If you approve of the other
things I tell you, you may talk about them and carry them out. And if at any time
any technical difficulties should arise, I shall be ready to help you solve them.
It is sufficient for you to call upon me in thought, and I shall know, even at a
distance.
Friendship does not impose conditions, and generosity ought to be our universal
motto.
I also ask you that if one day you should want to make use of this information for
the good of the world, you should first tell your own people, as the Brazilians are
not aggressive and abhor war. Do not try to explain the problem to anyone who could
make one of these craft into a weapon of mass destruction.
However, if your people do not attach any importance to the information, you should
publish it as you see fit. You should do this without any restrictions, so that all
men know it and no one nation can gain an advantage over another.
Now I will satisfy your curiosity, but first please pay special attention to
certain details which I have told you. Around every inhabited globe in space there
is an etheric fluid which envelops it and creates suitable conditions for life.
It is a temporary habitat, not only for men but also for spirits. No one can escape
from it unless he knows how to produce another for his use.
Q: Are spirits also caught within this etheric envelope?
A: Yes. A spirit inhabiting a planet has a fluid body surrounding it. A spirit who
is still bound by matter to any extent, cannot live without it. If it attempts to
escape from its particular world, its spirit body leaves it and is re-assimilated
into the etheric envelope of the planet. Thus, even spirits are prisoners for as
long as they are unable to reject evil, and remain ignorant.
Many people call this fluid "ether," but the label is of little importance. It is a
question of words, which does not affect the problem. What is important is to know
what it is made of
We could well call it" electric fluid," which would be nearer the truth. In
electricity there is a negative charge, and a positive charge. In physics we have
protons and anti-protons, mesons and anti-mesons, electrons and anti-electrons,
matter and anti-matter. On Earth we only find matter, yet it is possible to create
anti-matter.
A body made of anti-matter would be expelled from matter. The force of repulsion
would be unbelievable. There are interplanetary vessels which are composed entirely
of anti-matter, but the force-field created by this means has a terrifying effect
on the physical properties of the people travelling in them.
For this reason our space ships are made of matter.
Further, we make our own etheric fluid inside the saucer, and by changing its
polarity so as to oppose that of the Earth we are repelled from the planet at a
speed corresponding to the difference in polarity between the saucer and the Earth.
A knowledge of magnetic fields is required. You on Earth do not yet define them
correctly, but we know that the magnetic field is made up of the "electric fluids'
of the planet. If we "manufacture" an electric fluid which differs from the

terrestrial etheric 'envelope, the magnetic field of the Earth no longer affects
us, and we enjoy complete freedom of movement. We can change direction in a way
that amazes you, we can move at the speed of light and suffer no ill effects. It is
a complete breaking of the shackles which bind man.
Within the Earth's atmosphere we always use a vacuum system, but when we leave this
atmosphere we put the anti-electron producing machinery into action, and our escape
velocity is then phenomenal. Without wishing to terrify you, I can tell you that
normally we can reach Mars in a matter of minutes, unless there is a breakdown, and
then the trip becomes tedious.
When you entered our craft I called your attention to the different kind of light
inside which did not emanate from any particular piece of machinery, but was caused
by the air itself being luminous. You also noticed an agreeable, almost spiritual
feeling of lightness, a state of near levitation, as well as a feeling of great
well-being.
At that time you were in an artificial etheric atmosphere and not the ordinary
Earth atmosphere. When one's eyes are accustomed to seeing the terrestrial ether,
the artificial ether appears luminous.
Without this artificial ether no interplanetary voyage is possible. If you tried to

make a journey without this precaution, you would face certain death. The fluid
which binds you to your bodies would leave you, and your bodies would instantly be
crystallised. This is the mystery of the crystallised bodies which reach the Earth
in the form of meteorites, any body in space without ether undergoes this process,
whether it be made of carbon, calcium, iron, nickel, or any other element.
After passing out of the magnetic field of the Earth, all we need to do is to
create an ether similar to that of the planet to which we are travelling, and we
will then be attracted by it. We can create this ether of another planet even on
Earth, so that we will be repelled from Earth and attracted to the other planet
whose ether is contained within the saucer.
On reaching that planet, we need only to change the ether again to propel ourselves
once more into space.
By this means life can be maintained inside the craft whatever its construction,
and at the same time it provides us with a means of locomotion.
Q:I think I understand the system, it is rational enough, but the difficulty would
appear to lie in making and changing this "electric fluid" as required.
A: You are wrong there. In Nature nothing is difficult. Things are only difficult
for those who make them so. Let us go back to what I told you about an electron
being a wave and not a particle. One of your physicists said, correctly, that an
electron is an integration of electro-magnetic waves. But an electro-magnetic wave
can be of positive or negative polarity. If we were to send electro-magnetic pulses
between magnets, the waves thus produced would create an ether different from that
on Earth. A variation in the distance between the plates would bring about a
modification in the ether produced. That is what you wanted to know in clear and
simple terms. I cannot tell you more clearly than that.
Q: Is very much electrical energy required to bring about this effect?
A: Everything is relative. On our saucer, the voltage and current are very high
indeed. On a small craft used for research, very little current would be needed.

Q: Where do you get this energy from to achieve these results?
A: There are various means of making it. It can be obtained by turning hydrogen
into helium at low temperature and bombarding deuterium with heavier mesons,
releasing a fabulous amount of energy; or by using ultra rays in an acid solution
saturated with helium nuclei. The latter process is the most usual.
Q: How does the transformation of ultra rays into useable energy take place?
A: If you allow radioactivity to pass through a magnetic field you will get alpha,
beta and gamma rays. The first are helium nuclei, the second are electrons and the
third are gamma rays which are similar to ultra rays in their electro-magnetic
content. These three components of radioactivity are related.
The ultra rays, or gamma rays, on passing close to helium nuclei, bring about a
deformation of space and give birth to electrons until their wave energy is
expended. Thus when gamma rays pass through an acid solution saturated with helium
nuclei, the newly created electrons gyrate around the nuclei, but the acid prevents
them from joining up with the nuclei, and they are collected on plates at the
bottom of the apparatus. This provides an inexhaustible supply of energy which
requires nothing more than a little acid solution and some helium nuclei.
There are, however, other means. On an interplanetary journey something might go

wrong with the apparatus we use for transforming hydrogen into helium and the gamma
ray collecting apparatus. If this should happen we would turn to solar energy. We
would pass it through a tube of coal gas. This gas, with a suitable catalyst,
unites with water, turning it into formaldehyde. This product is then oxidised
giving us coal-gas and water again.
In this second process solar energy is turned into useable electric current, which
is quite sufficient to meet our immediate requirements, as on interplanetary
voyages there is no lack of propulsive energy for the craft. The laws of inertia
provide us with the necessary acceleration to reach the planet that is our
objective.
Q: So that explains the whole operation of the saucer?
A: Yes, that is how it moves. We have, however, several navigational instruments,

as you were able to see. Supposing you had to explain to somebody how a jet plane
moves, you would naturally say that a backward thrust is exerted which impels the
craft in a forward direction. That would be true, but inside the plane there are
many navigational instruments.
If I were to begin to talk to you about the equipment we use for detecting the
etheric covering of planets, that alone would take us some three hours. The
instrument we use for interplanetary communication is also complex; it is based on
principles that you already know of, but have not put into practice.
The most important scientific discoveries are still to be made in the simplest
things. The secret lies in concentrating on the main issue without going into
abstract formulae.
With a formula you can explain a phenomenon but you cannot discover it. In science
we have to try to discover things, even though everything may already appear to
have been discovered. To bring formulae into the calculation merely complicates
something that was previously simple.

How would your formulae help to show that a difference of energy potential could be
produced between the atmospheric pressure and a vacuum, thus producing a thrust. If
you had discovered this, it would not have to be proved. The craft itself would
have been sufficient demonstration. Anything else is academic pedantry.
Terrestrial science does not accept anything which cannot be proved mathematically,
and is then only accessible to the few. I can assure you that many brilliant ideas
have been shelved for the sole reason that their originators were not sufficiently
versed in mathematics to supply the necessary proofs. This kills the spirit of
research in a world where so much is yet to be discovered.
Q: We supposed, hitherto, that the saucer simply cancelled out the effect of
gravity.
A: You supposed something that doesn't exist. Gravity is no more than a wrong
interpretation of a combination of phenomena.
Q: What? Doesn't gravity exist?
A: It does not exist. What science calls gravity is a question of a difference in

the density of bodies. To explain; the smoke of your cigar is heavier than the
surrounding air. Yet, it rises as the result of warmth. That is to say the
difference in density is compensated for by the temperature of the smoke.
Therefore, two factors are at work which can influence this phenomenon; density and
temperature.
We can see that a balloon full of hydrogen gas rises, according to the volume of
the gas. The same thing happens with helium. That is to say, bodies of lesser
density always tend to rise, in the same way that water and oil separate, due to
density: Gravity does not prevent bodies of lesser density from rising. Whereas in
air, which is of low density, heavy objects fall rapidly, in water-more dense than
air-they fall more slowly. The third factor influencing gravity is the mass of
atmosphere and ether surrounding a planet; this can, however, be included in the
factor of density. It is wrong to attribute greater or lesser gravity to a planet
without knowing the extent of its gaseous mass and the density of its atmosphere.
On Saturn, for example, owing to the absence of atmosphere, gravity is considered
zero. On Jupiter, which has a very rarefied atmosphere, it is quite different. A
falling body has a high initial acceleration and then it collides with the low
density of the planet. On Mercury, however, where the etheric covering extends more
than 6oo,ooo km., atmospheric pressure is high and gravity is tremendous.
The fourth factor influencing gravity is the vertical component of magnetism.

However, the attraction it exerts on a body is, with small variations, the same as
that on any other body. Thus it is that the speed of fall in a vacuum is constant.
However, this attraction is not due to mass, it is caused by the magnetism with
which the whole body is endowed.
Lastly, we have the energy that exerts pressure upon the Universe and penetrates
our systems of galaxies, of which I spoke to you earlier. As a body cannot be
subject to pressure in all directions, the Earth always shielding it from this
pressure on one side, the body feels a difference in the forces acting upon it and
falls to the surface of the Earth.
This tremendous universal pressure, which is the result of the vibration of God on
the infinite point of the Universe, is what maintains the atmosphere of the
planets.'

As the atmospheric pressure has the fabulous power we use to propel our saucers,
and as the tendency of gases is towards continual expansion, the whole of the
gaseous envelope surrounding a planet would expand into the vacuum were it not
maintained by constant pressure.
When Newton saw the apple fall, he could not guess that in that moment he witnessed
the effect of the divine presence in the Universe. Thus it is that we move and have
our being in God.
Gravity is, then, a combination of phenomena and never an individualised force.
Q: Why does heat affect gravity?
A: Because it reduces the magnetic force of bodies. You can prove that a magnet
loses its properties on being heated. As matter is made up of stationary waves,
heat has a powerful influence on them. By increasing the frequency of these waves
they begin to give off light. Moreover, it is well known that heat reduces the
density of a body. Accordingly, it tends to rise. This can best be seen in the case
of boiling water.
The warmer water tries to place itself above the cooler, producing currents. We
note that heat is a factor which affects gravity, not because it is itself an agent
causing the phenomena of gravity, but because it influences magnetism and density.
Q: Does this mean that our science is wrong?
A: Very wrong.
Q: Then all our physics, including relativity, fall to the ground?
A: Only the fallacious principles fall to the ground. Others will certainly remain
valid. Does it seem strange to you that this should happen? Ptolemy was a genius,
but his entire system collapsed like a pack of cards. The same thing happened with
Aristotle. In turn, Isaac Newton came up with the physics of relativity, and its
days are numbered.
Q: But relativity provided an explanation for the irregularity in the orbit of

Mercury.
A: It could give an explanation, it remains to be seen whether it is rational.
But even supposing it were, we need to see whether it corresponds with the method
Nature uses. We can advance a thousand rational hypotheses, whereas Nature makes
use of only one, rejecting the other , however rational they may be; or again, it
may not even make use of any of them.
Relativity contains certain erroneous elements which in themselves can be called

rational, but which Nature, according to the view of Sir James Jeans, appears to
disregard. For example, it is an accepted mechanical theory that if two rays move
in the same direction at the same speed, their velocity in relation to one another
is nil; but if they move in opposite directions, the velocity of the one in
relation to the other is 2V. However, in order to cope with certain difficulties in
his system, Einstein affirmed that whether the rays move in one direction or
another, the velocity between them is always V.
It is not necessary to have much imagination to see that this principle is false.

In order to justify this fallacy, Einstein invented another, greater one; he

attributed a space and a time appropriate to each moving body, according to its
speed. But as one error leads mankind to another greater one, he had now to produce
a third idea in order to justify the second; he set confines to the Universe,
marking out a particular space for us. But Nature disregards imaginary enclosures,
and our desire that the Universe should conform to our particular points of view,
as well as our carefully thought out ideas. Throughout she behaves as though she
were ignorant of Hamilton's calculus and the importance which Earth people attach
to formulae.
In short, you can see that the frontiers proposed by Einstein were too narrow to
contain what is by nature infinite. Space is indivisible and time is non-existent.
The latter is merely a convention based on the movement of the stars. It is merely
an effect.
If the movement of a body, or the acceleration of a mass, is due to force, time is

then an effect of the force and the latter' is the cause. But if the force varies
and is consumed, time will vary accordingly. Now, as space is a constant, it is
difficult to imagine how you could create a time/space constant, let alone regard
it as a dimension in itself. This is an example of Nature disregarding these
things. If one multiplies two dimensions one gets the area; if one multiplies area
by height, one gets the volume; now, if one multiplies this volume by a fourth
dimension, one only gets nonsense. In space, a body does not travel in four, three,
two one dimension,because space, being infinite, has no dimensions whatsoever. We
can, at the most, say that a body obeys a direction of stress when it moves from
point A to point B.
Up to a point Einstein was right in saying that a moving body in space has its own
time, because when one leaves the Earth there is a change in what is conventionally
known as terrestrial time; but basically he was wrong. Time is based on the period
a moving body takes to return to its point of departure, and is thus the result of
a circular movement. He made a further mistake when he assumed that every moving
body created a space of its own and peculiar to itself.
The precession of Mercury's perhelions, which gave rise to this theory, is due to
the planet's proximity to the Sun. As it moves closer to the Sun, it receives more
light, rotates more rapidly and moves through space with greater speed.
Q: Well, then, what about the curvature of light, obseryed by Eddington, Crommelin
and Davidson during the eclipse of the Sun on May 29th, 1919, which formed part of
Einstein's theory?
A: The curvature of light is not due to the action of the mass of the Sun, but is
caused by the magnetic centre of the system situated near the Sun. Even within a
solenoid you can see that a stream of electrons is deflected by a magnetic field.
There is nothing new in this. If light were to be deflected when passing close to a
mass, this phenomenon could be clearly observed in the vicinity of planets, let us
say Mars, when it is close to Earth. Eclipses of the Moon, for example, would
provide the best opportunity for such observation.
Nevertheless, this curvature was only seen precisely where the magnetic centre of
our system is to be found. If there were no repulsion between energy and magnetism,
your motors would not turn. Therefore, light is deflected by the magnetic centre
and curves round the Sun. If you had proper apparatus, you would see that light
also curves on the side opposite the centre, as though it were trying to get away
from the Sun.
I wish to imply that the curvature of space is anti-scientific. Primordial space is

not relative to any thing and has no form at all. It is neither a curve nor a
straight line, and it has no dimensions, it is simply space, infinite in all
directions. Wheresoever an observer may place himself, he will always have before
him the infinite Universe.
Q: Then no limit can be conceived to matter?
A: If in space there should be a point that could serve as a limit to creation,

there God would be contained. But God is infinite, and the Universe is a point to
Him. Only a materialistic science could limit creation. If you conceive a limit,
what would you then have beyond it?
Q: I should say, nothing.
A: Truly, you would have nothing. But space is nothing transformed by God. Matter
also is nothing. If it comprises anything, it is the divine energy that brought
life to space. To you matter is something; but make a stream of cathode rays pass
through it and it will disappear from your view. You will only see space.
All that appears is an illusion of our senses. Only one thing is real; that is
Spirit, and that is exactly what earthly science does not admit.
Q: It is hard for us to learn that our most cherished concepts are completely at
variance with reality.
A: Indeed, one of the bad aspects of man is his obstinacy. If I had erred for an
eternity, I would welcome the day when someone would enlighten me. Believe me, l'am
telling you the truth. What pain can anyone feel by putting error aside and seeing
the truth.
Q: But it is difficult for us to abandon the science of relativity.
A: It will be difficult for science, also, to abandon the experiments of Hertz and
Fresnel, who settled upon the wave theory of light. However, when science has to
explain electronic theory, the wave theory is put aside; when atomic theory is in
question, it turns things upside down and says that the electron is a particle, and
has recourse to Planck's theory.
Before abandoning relativity, first decide whether the wave theory or the emission
theory is true. Verify the true speed of light. Determine the action and reaction
of the planetary system. Never use two interpretations in one science, in order to
explain the same thing.
Q: I have noted the factors which you say affect gravity, but there is a case which
should be considered. If it is true that the density of bodies affects gravity, on
the top of a mountain the air is more rarefied so that iron, for example, being in
a more attenuated medium, should weigh more. However, the contrary is the case, the
higher one goes, the less it weighs.
A: But I told you also that gravity is affected by the mass of ether surrounding
the planet. If the weight of the atmosphere, at sea level, is equivalent to a
column of mercury of 76 cm. for each 10 m. of altitude the column falls about 1 mm.
Thus, we must consider the pressure which bodies undergo as a function of their
density. The lower the atmospheric pressure, the less is the weight. If gravity
were a force with its own attributes and it was that which supported bodies in
space, it would be rather difficult for earthly science to explain why meteors are

maintained in their orbits. Every year Earth collides with millions of meteorites,
always in the same month. This means that they are located in one place. Now, if
there were a law of gravitation, they would either all come towards Earth, or
already have been attracted by the Sun.
However, those which succeed in penetrating the mass of ether fall to Earth and the
others remain in the same place. They are, then, in balance between the magnetic
attraction of the centre of the system and the repulsive force of the Sun. For
terrestrial gravity to exist, there would have to be solar attraction, but neither
of these exist.
If my reasoning were incorrect, bodies in a vacuum would never have the same speed
of fall.
For the sake of argument, let us suppose that gravity exists. But if all bodies in
a vacuum fall with equal velocity, it ceases to be true that matter attracts matter
in direct proportion to their respective mass, at least not if this matter is in a
vacuum. If this premise is demolished, it is easy to see that if a vacuum exists
between the celestial bodies, solar gravitation-if it exists-should attract all
bodies equally, independently of their mass. But all terrestrial astronomy is based
on the mass of bodies and their distance from one another.
Therefore your conception of the cosmos is wrong. Besides, when Newton supposed a
gravitational force to exist, he had to imagine the existence of an ether. He could
not conceive of this force without there being a vehicle for it. And it is strange
that, later, relativity denies the ether and yet approves of gravity. it admits
what the discoverer of gravity himself could not admit.
This being the case, we do not cancel out gravity at all. All we do is to utilise
the forces of Nature. if our craft flew on the basis of cancelling out gravity, as
you suppose, we would only move in one direction. We would always fly against the
Earth's rotation, and it would be impossible to fly with it, or anywhere near the
poles. Besides, we would be limited to the insignificant speed of 1,660 km. per
hour.
Now, it is laughable to imagine a craft coming from another planet with such low
velocity and with only one directional movement. Such a saucer would be much
inferior to terrestrial aircraft and it would be a case of our coming to learn from
you something about manoeuvrability and how to fly faster.

Message Page 1 of 7
Author's Note, Chap. 4

The extraordinary power of atmospheric pressure was discovered in 1654. It was then
that Otto Guericke carried out his famous experiment with two hemispheres. Even
sixteen horses could not succeed in pulling them apart. Another time he exhausted
the air from a copper cauldron but the terrific exterior pressure crumpled it as
though it were a piece of paper.
A short while ago, a water sprout was observed at Santos in Brazil, and the bathers
on the beach were able to witness this spectacle. Several tons of water were seen
to rise to a great height and then fall back again. If a ship had been passing at
that moment, it would have been sucked several hundred feet into the air.
This was merely the effect of an area of low pressure, not an absolute vacuum. This
phenomenon is caused by a whirly wind which spins the air molecules at great speed,
thus creating a semi-vacuum at the centre by virtue of the centrifugal force. As
the atmospheric pressure is exerted on the whole of the surface area of the sea, a
tremendous volume of water rises up into the low-pressure area. Toricelli, the
notable Italian physicist, found that atmospheric pressure acting on the surface of
the Earth was equal to 76 cm. of mercury in his tube. Given that 1 cu. cm. of water
weighs 1 gr. and that mercury is 136 times heavier than water, he concluded that
the atmospheric pressure per cm.2 should be 136 gr. x 76 cm., which gives 033 kg.
per cm.
This, however, is the pressure at sea level only. For every 10 m. above sea level,
the height of the column of mercury decreases by i mm. In theory, atmospheric
pressure should cease to exist at a height of 76 km.
However, physics will need to revise its calculations as air currents have been
observed at about this height. Air currents parallel to the Earth's surface give
the upper layers of the atmosphere a considerable degree of support, especially
when we remember that these layers move at a speed of some 1400 m.p.h., or faster
than a jet plane. If these currents did not exist, we would be crushed by the
terrific atmospheric pressure.
So that in whatever part of the atmosphere a saucer is, there is a considerable

atmospheric pressure available for propulsion, its speed will depend on the degree
of vacuum it happens to be wing. To give you some idea of the power of atmospheric
pressure at 1.033 kg. per cm.2: there is a pressure of almost 500 kg. now acting on
the page of this book.
A man can slide a weight of several hundred kilograms over a smooth surface, and
can move several thousand kilograms floating in water. However, no one has ever
been able to lift a weight of 500 kg. unaided, and even in water our large ships
only displace a few thousand tons. On the other band, a saucer 20 m. diameter can
develop a lift of more than 3 million kg., producing an absolute vacuum on its
upper surface. If its diameter were increased to 60 in., the lift obtained from the
atmospheric pressure would reach the incredible total of 29 million kg.
There is thus nothing on Earth to equal this force. If such a craft were built on
Earth it would completely revolutionise our transport system. Such a fantastic
power, enough to lift a skyscraper into the air, would make our large cargo ships

Message Page 2 of 7
look insignificant, for not only do these craft have an enormous carrying capacity,
but they can also move at the speed of lightning without needing landing fields. We
would not even have any further use for cranes.
There is no great difficulty involved in the production of an exterior vacuum.
For reasons of security we are not permitted to give all the information that was
imparted by the captain of the flying saucer.
If anybody were to use the system as here described, he would get nowhere because
there is also another important factor involved, apart from the high voltage and
current and the anti-cathode plates which we mentioned.
The known effects produced by cathode rays are as follows:
(1) They produce fluorescence in bodies with which they come into contact.
(2) They are deflected by a magnetic field.
(3) They are attracted by the positive plate of a condenser.
(4) They penetrate matter enabling one to "see" through it.
(5) They decompose the elements that make up the atmosphere.
(6) They discharge bodies carrying an electric charge.
Now that we know the principle by which saucers move, we can explain the various
phenomena connected with their sightings.
The light that has been seen round them at night depends on the degree of vacuum.
By varying the vacuum the colour is also changed. The flakes that have been seen to
fall when flying saucers pass over are a precipitate of nitrogen. The nitrogen, by
the action of currents, falls from the atmosphere and settles on the ground. The
luminous wake which saucers leave is a result of the ionisation by cathode rays.
After their passage, there must be an intense molecular disturbance of the air,
which would appear to the observer like a vapour trail.
There is no friction between the saucer and the atmosphere, however quickly it
moves. It always moves through a tunnel of low pressure.
All a saucer would have to do to destroy one of our aircraft would be to get close
enough for the aircraft to come within the area of low pressure round the saucer,
and then suddenly change the direction of the vacuum which would release the full
atmospheric pressure on to the aircraft. This would smash it to pieces.
This is what happened to Captain Mantell. When he was pursuing the saucer he got
into the low-pressure area that was maintaining the saucer in the air. After he had
gone through this area, he ran up against the wall of atmospheric pressure on the
opposite side, and was shattered to pieces. He probably died when passing through
the vacuum created by the saucer and may never have been aware of the
disintegration of the plane.

Message Page 3 of 7
This was certainly not done intentionally by the people in the saucer, and could
only have been an accident.
It is apposite to mention certain other details of the functioning of the saucer,

based on the cathode ray method of propulsion. Gassiot, in the middle of the
nineteenth century, made the first unsuccessful attempts to pass electricity
through rarefied gases. After him, Plucker invented the tube which was later used
by Geissler for his experiments, from which the name "Geissler tubes" is derived.
Other scientists of world fame, like Crookes, also carried out experiments with
considerable success, which resulted in considerable progress in the field of
physics.
In a Geissler tube the atmospheric pressure is reduced to between 1 and 3 mm. of

mercury. If the tube contains air and the anode and cathode ends of it are put into
contact with the positive and negative poles of a high tension electric current,
the whole tube lights up with a violet light, with the exception of a space at the
cathode end where the light is blue and separated from the remaining violet light
by a dark band.
Various effects are brought about by changing the gas pressure inside the tube,
such as the appearance of dark bands which are known as Faraday bands; the
disintegration of gas molecules, liberating hydrogen; changes in the colour of the
light to green, yellow, red, etc. Crookes succeeded in proving the mechanical
action of cathode rays by bombarding rotary blades with them and setting them in
motion. Similar experiments with spheres painted black produced the same result.
There was, however, one great difficulty which dogged the steps of science: cathode
rays could not leave the tube of rarefied air since they were incapable of passing
through any substance. The scientists asked themselves what effect cathode rays had
on the ordinary atmosphere.
It was then that Lenard, Nobel prize winner in physics in 1905, working on Hertz'
previous experiments, made an aluminium "window" on the opposite side to the
cathode which projected the rays outside the tube where they could be studied with
ease. He proved that these "Lenard rays" could be propagated in the atmosphere as
easily as in the rarefied air of the tube, causing atmospheric phenomena of a
similar nature. He proved that the passage of electrons through the dense air of
the atmosphere appeared to open up a tunnel giving rise to strong ionisation of the
particles with considerable air turbulence and luminous effects which varied
according to the voltage used.
However, he could not completely comprehend the nature of the phenomena as he did
not know that they were the result of a disturbance in the atmosphere and ether.
The most important thing as far as we are concerned, is to know whether or not
jonisation causes a drop in atmospheric pressure. It is now well known from
meteorology that heavy ions cause low pressure, they often bring about devastating
cyclones. It is known that the emission of a single particle of medium velocity can
produce in the first centimetre of its trajectory through the atmosphere as many as
24,400 ions. The number gradually increases as the particle proceeds along its
trajectory. Even using a low voltage the electrons moved through space at a speed
of between 25,000 and 50,000 miles per second.
Later it was observed that by using 250,000 volts 'the elctrons moved at 150,000
miles per second. In one experiment 900,000 volts was used, but the speed of the
electron was not noted. It is also well known that the higher the voltage used, the
greater is the number of ions produced, sometimes as many as 2 million ions
appearing in the first centimetre of the electron's trajectory.

Message Page 4 of 7
Subsequent experiments showed that the electrons emanating from cathode ray tubes
could break down the atmosphere and set free hydrogen which then also became
ionised.
It may well be that these rays break the atmosphere down completely, and set free
the nuclei, which they subsequently join up with, thus producing the amount of
hydrogen that has been observed.
Madame Curie was able to calculate the speed of ions as 1.3 cm. per electron volt
in dense atmosphere, and 6.7 cm. per electron volt when the ionic movement took
place in pure hydrogen. This shows that a high voltage would result in a higher
electron speed and that in the upper atmosphere the speed would be greater.
The vacuum creating effect is, however, not strictly due to the intrinsic speed of
the ion, but to the atmosphere's ability to absorb ionised particles. While
negative ions are absorbed by the atmosphere, the positive ones move towards the
negatively charged surface of the saucer, at which point the electrons pass into
the vacuum.
In an ordinary cathode ray tube the electric current reaches a saturation point
which shows that all the atmospheric particles contained within the tube have been
ionised. This is due to the limited amount of electrolyte within the confines of
the tube. In the case of the flying saucer the electrolyte is made up of the whole
atmospheric envelope of the Earth which never reaches saturation point. The ionised
"bubble" surrounding the saucer is attracted and absorbed by the surrounding
atmosphere with tremendous force and in its place only a vacuum is left, into which
the saucer moves, impelled by the atmospheric pressure of 1.033 kg. per cm2.
The reader may ask how the saucer can stop in space. The question is a pertinent
one because if an inexperienced saucer pilot were to cut off the current, the
atmosphere would immediately fill the vacuum, generating sufficient heat to
vaporise the saucer and produce a tremendous explosion. Any short circuit would be
equally disastrous.
There are, however, various means by which a saucer can be brought to a standstill.
One is by a magnetic effect which deflects electrons, but we would prefer not to
talk about this here. The chief means, however, is to create a vacuum on the other
side of the saucer as well, preventing the atmosphere from exerting pressure on the
craft.
There is another way this is done which we would like to outline to the reader, but
it involves the whole question of the automatic production of propulsive power for
the saucer itself. In the previous chapter we mentioned various systems of
producing energy but we refrained from mentioning the principal one, which we have
now decided to include in this book to add to its authenticity.
This is not a perpetual motion system which some people might suppose. Energy for
the saucer can be extracted from the atmosphere itself, ensuring constant
uninterrupted mobility.
We saw that it was not the movement of ions themselves that produced the vacuum,
but the atmosphere's ability to absorb them, which corresponds to the electric
potential of the atmosphere. If the end of an insulated wire is heated, anything
from 6o to 6oo volts are developed for every metre that the wire is raised above
ground level.
This gives some idea of the magnitude of this potential. More energy is obtained

Message Page 5 of 7
from the effect of atmospheric pressure on the craft than is required to create the
vacuum.
An electric motor is an example of this type of operation. The motor will not work
without an electromagnet to create the magnetic field; but the electromagnet is
made of soft iron and has no latent magnetism. If a current is passed through it,
the motor begins to turn under the action of the current. The current supplied to
the electromagnet is not proportional to the effect obtained by the rotation of the
motor. The electromagnet in this illustration performs the same function as the
ionised particles which merely supply the atmosphere with the means by which
absorption takes place.
Another illustration we can give is the fission of uranium. The energy used is only
the minimal amount required to bring two masses of uranium dose enough to cause
their explosion. The presence of one produces an excitation in the other and
immediately a chain reaction is set off. These illustrations help us to understand
how saucers obtain their energy automatically without confusing this process with
perpetual motion.
Many people who have seen saucers have observed that most of them, but not all,
have a hollow tube running through their centre. Inside this there is an air
turbine. If some 3oo,oOo kg. of pressure is sufficient to move a saucer of zo m.
diameter, and the available pressure exceeds 3 million kg., there is a considerable
margin of surplus energy. The air pressing against one side of the saucer rushes
through the vent into the area of the vacuum and creates a strong current that
actuates the blades of the turbine.
In a "tunnel" of air 4 metre in diameter, pressure on the turbine blades would be

equal to 130 tons, that is, the pressure of a jet of water of i sq. metre falling
from 130 m. The current of air thus produced would be sufficient to suck a man into
it from 100 yd. away. If a saucer with its turbine working were to pass over a
tree, the movement of the air currents would strip off its branches.
The energy thus obtained would be sufficient to keep a dozen factories going.
This is the way in which the inhabitants of other planets generate the electrical
energy they require without using waterfalls, which are preserved for their natural
beauty.
The air that goes in one side rushes into the vacuum and is there immediately
ionised and absorbed by the atmosphere. Thus there is always a small layer of
atmosphere close to the saucer. When the saucer wants to stop, the emission of
Lenard rays is decreased and this atmospheric layer gradually increases until it
joins up with the adjacent atmosphere.
Any violent collisions between the particles that might occur would take place away
from the surface of the saucer, giving it complete structural protection.
At first sight it might seem absurd to make a tunnel to utilise atmospheric

pressure, yet what is a chimney but a vertical tunnel which makes use of a
difference in atmospheric pressure?
It may well be that many people before us have looked at the power in waterfalls
with wonder, but considered it impossible to use as the pressure was only exerted
in one direction. One day, however, someone must have realised that a paddle-wheel
could be used to transform this power.

Message Page 6 of 7
When it came to the question of exploiting the expansive forces of gases, even the
most renowned scientists ridiculed the idea of using this uncontrollable force,
until an unqualified mechanic constructed the first motor utilising this difference
of energy potential by the use of pistons. The same thing happened with steam;
orthodox science, having looked into the idea, decreed that the machine would not
move.
In spite of this edict, great liners now proudly plough the seven seas. In 1934 the
erudite American C. C. Furnas wrote about atomic energy, saying that any attempt to
exploit the energy contained in the nucleus would be doomed to failure because the
energy derived from its disintegration would be less than that required to bring
the disintegration about.
Eleven years later, atomic power terrorised multitudes and today keeps the world in
a state of panic.
It often happens that the effect is many times greater than the cause. When mixing
chlorine with water a small ray of light is sufficient to detonate the mixture and
convert it into energy.
The small amount of energy contained in a fuse cup or detonator is sufficient to

send a projectile several miles.
The same thing happens with the inexhaustible energy available to a saucer. The
atmospheric ionisation on one side gives rise to a fantastic pressure on the other.
It is the detonator that unleashes a cyclone behind the saucer.
What we are stating is not a pipe dream, but something quite practicable, the
result of observation in low which more advanced beings than ourselves have used
with complete success.
The author of this book does not claim any exclusivity with regard to this
knowledge, as it is certain that other men on Earth also possess it.
It is only that they will always refuse to reveal what they know, for fear of
vested interests, or because they have been sworn to secrecy by certain
philosophical orders, whose existence everyone is aware of. The whole world, the
pattern of life of nations, commercial interests, governments, frontiers, in fact
everything could be transformed by the exploitation of this atmospheric energy.
Cars would lose their raison d'etre and there would be no further need for roads or
railways, nor for large port installations or ships.
The ownership of land would cease to exist. The head of a family could put his
house on wings and move about in space visiting any part of the world he wished,
with his whole household and without, it should be noted, having to give any
explanation to officious Customs officers, unless aerial barriers are set up.
Governments would not be in a position to impose crushing taxes, and without taxes
there would be no armies to make wars to plague us.
The flying saucer could be used to destroy humanity, but it could also lead to
man's complete liberation and the release from the "patriotic" chains that bind
him, and the reinstatement of his right to direct his own life which a misguided
social order deprived him of, leading him by various isms to a criminal and
unbrotherly clash of interests.

Message Page 7 of 7
The petroleum reserves of Earth are running out, fissionable material will one day
come to an end and with deforestation, rivers and waterfalls will dry up, but
atmospheric pressure will always be there.
God gave man inexhaustible wealth to be exploited as the evolution of life and
intelligence proceed. Before we were created, He prepared our table with our "daily
bread."
In our intellectual blindness we cannot discern the laden table and, famished, pray
that He should satisfy our hunger. Nature, however, wellnigh revolted by such
stupidity, pushes into our mouth things which we have only to stretch forth our
hands to get.
It is infuriating to us proud members of modem Western civilisation, lords of fire

and thunder, with the exalted title of homo sapiens, that individuals from other
planets, whose very existence we had until recently disbelieved, should have to
teach us how to use atmospheric energy to save ourselves from dying of atmospheric
pollution or becoming cannibals. If we do not, strictly speaking, eat each other's
flesh, we live on the sweat of the poor in a disgraceful and unjust society, which
progress will one day have to supplant; unless we kill ourselves off in a hydrogen
war before that happens.
We would rather not say anything about the electronic fluid discussed by the
captain of the flying saucer. The malevolence of humanity is enough to discourage
anyone and turn to stone the most friendly of hearts. Man's antecedents prove his
intentions. All that has been achieved to date has been used to further his
murderous, dominating and imperialist spirit.
Santos Dumont, one of those beings without parallel, who only grace this world once
in a century, sought in death an escape from his conscience for having given wings
to man, while in the depths of his soul there was only love and desire for
progress. In wishing to make man into an angel he forgot that we were not men but
wild beasts. He gave wings to vipers. This kindly soul, doubtless used to living
among the immortals in a glorious homeland far from Earth, did not realise that
what was progress for good people was, for us, a calamity without parallel. He
would never have made his invention into a weapon of mass murder.
If Pasteur had dreamed that his discovery would one day give rise to
bacteriological warfare, he would rather have taken his knowledge to the grave;
if Galvani could have foreseen the electric chair he would have preferred not to
have exposed himself to ridicule by asserting that frogs' legs could be made to
twitch; Marconi would certainly have committed suicide had he foreseen that radio
could be used for the remote control of missiles which in future war could destroy
life on Earth; Curie and his wife would never have revealed radioactivity to the
world had they been able to foresee the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
It is not necessary to state how a flying saucer can leave the Earth. If, one day,
higher beings more advanced than ourselves see in man a sufficient greatness of
soul to reach up to them, they will come to meet us and aid us in the great journey
through space. It is not up to the humble author of this book to tell the world the
why and wherefore of things. Others who do not belong to the Earth will discharge
this duty. On that day the condor will come down from the Andes, not only to visit
us earthworms of the lowlands, but to give us wings powerful enough to make the
return journey to the Andes. May this day not be far distant!

Message Page 1 of 9
ASTRO-NAVIGATION, Chap. 5
Q: Shall we one day be able to journey through space and visit other planets?
A: Yes, it will be possible, as it is, in fact, at present. There is now much talk on
Earth of journeys through space and of conquering other worlds and their inhabitants but
before running the tremendous risks involved, one needs to know all the laws which govern
the planetary system and the peculiarities of each one of the planets. If one were
ignorant of these laws one would be destroyed before leaving the rarefied matter that
surrounds the Earth; and if we are to have the pleasure of being conquered we should hate
to see you come to grief without having got beyond the gaseous envelope of your own
planet! There is no visible doorway into space, but it is shut to those who are ignorant
of the fundamental laws that govern it.
Knowledge is the key that opens it.
But in view of the state of Earthly knowledge, this is as yet an impossible dream.
Science will not be able, in one fell swoop, to achieve the conquest of space when it
knows nothing about what happens more than 300 miles up.
How do you think that man, who knows nothing of the forces which move and maintain the
planets in space, can leave the Earth? This would be tantamount to a primitive savage
building an aeroplane and flying.
A certain American official even went so far as to state that other planets would have to
be conquered, and the Stars and Stripes hoisted on them. He presumably thought this was
the best way of defending Democracy and our Christian values.
To achieve this using fuel propellants is impractical for various reasons, if only
because fuel is unnecessary. If the forces which operate in the planetary system were
indeed those which terrestrial science claims them to be, the saucer would be attracted
by the Sun or by the planets and in this case the law of inertia that maintains
acceleration imparted to a body would not be valid.
Even at this point science has gone wrong.
If one were to use fuel, a tremendous amount of it would be required in view of the time
it would take for a craft of this type to reach another planet. Then there is the
question of the return journey. This method is obviously impractical.
The difficulty facing the people of Earth is an illusory one. They need only to
understand cosmic laws and everything will be made easy. If we have been able to
understand them, you also will be able to.
Earth's scientists have got their terminology mixed. It appeared to them that the only
thing that could conceivably maintain the Earth in orbit and account for its revolution
was solar attraction, so they based all their calculations on this. In reality the
opposite is the case; the Sun exerts a repulsive force on the Earth. Further, as it was
obvious to them that a body could not maintain itself in an orbit when acted upon by a
single force, they impute miraculous qualities to centrifugal force, believing that it
was the second force that held the planets in their orbits. Nothing could be farther from
the truth.
Even if centrifugal force did give the necessary balance to a planet, which it does not,
there is one glaring omission in this theory, namely the force that impels a planet in a

Message Page 2 of 9
certain direction. They see that a planet is attracted, they also see that centrifugal
force counterbalances this attraction, but they do not see that they have overlooked a
third force which gives a planet movement. When one whirls a stone on the end of a
string, the string represents the force of attraction and centrifugal force plays the
part of repulsion, but the individual represents the third force which gives direction to
the stone.
If y = F or f= y x M,
then the element of propulsion F is necessary to make the Earth move, since it is this
that imparts an acceleration to the mass M. It is logical that a body to which
acceleration has been imparted should begin to move, but it is absurd to state that this
acceleration could be initiated without a force and then maintained without one,
especially as there is a loss of energy as the result of the movement of the body against
the action of gravity.
Your term is "centrifugal force," which means to say that all the points in a body tend
to fly away from the centre. We put it diffently. In our view all the points M' tend to
follow a straight line in space in the direction of the impelling force and at a tangent
to the equatorial plane of the body.
It is this interpretation of centrifugal force which gives direction to the saucer when
we leave the Earth or any other planet. Without it there would be no interplanetary
travel.
Now let us analyse the consequences of the terrestrial system based on solar attraction
and repulsion through centrifugal force: if all the points of a body tried to fly away
from the centre, the force of solar attraction resisted by the centrifugal force would
give rise to a loss of energy and the planet would become stationary.
We should also bear in mind that this loss of energy would be a double one as the Earth
develops two kinds of centrifugal force, the first due to its orbital velocity, and the
second due to its axial rotation. Work cannot be performed by a body without a source of
power. If Earth itself were the source of the power, then the whole of physics,
thermodynamics included, would be wrong.
This alone is sufficient to show the incorrectness of terrestrial astronomy, as a theory

is only valid when it answers all the relevant problems involved.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Let us look at the following:
Velocity in Distance from
Orbit the Sun Mass
Earth 66,000 m.p.h. 93,000,000 miles 1
Jupiter 29,500 m.p.h. 489,000,000 miles 317
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Jupiter, with a mass 317 times greater than that of the Earth, should be subject to a far
greater attraction than the Earth, yet the velocity in orbit is not high enough to
counterbalance this and maintain it in orbit. This planet has a large mass and a low
velocity. This being the case, either the orbital velocity of the Earth is too great for
its mass, and it should be flung out of its orbit, or Jupiter's is too low, and it should
be drawn into the Sun.

Message Page 3 of 9
Note that I give Jupiter's mass as 317 times that of the Earth, so as not to differ from
your estimate which is based on the force of attraction of the Sun against centrifugal
force. This figure, however, is incorrect.
You might raise the objection that Jupiter, with its large mass, revolves in an outer
orbit according to the theory that spheres of greater mass are said to be more subject to
the action of centrifugal force. Against this we have the case of Mars which is smaller
than the Earth, yet is farther from the Sun; or again, the planets beyond Jupiter which
are smaller than it, and yet revolve at a tremendous distance from the Sun. Moreover
their velocity in orbit is very low. So that does not make sense either.
The phenomena of Nature are simple and can easily be explained. The difficulties lie in
the capacity of beings to analyse the facts, and they often elaborate complicated systems
which are often quite ridiculous. There was one which lasted for some time which
maintained that the Earth was held in space by elephants. If anyone had had the sense to
ask what the elephants were standing on, this theory might have had a shorter life.
Nobody can equate problems without weighing all the factors which lead to their solution.
Scientists forgot, when dealing with the movement of planets, that energy must have been
used up as a result of solar attraction working against the two centrifugal forces
mentioned. If no explanation was given as to the source of power necessary to sustain the
movement- which in this case is what the elephants' feet stand on-then it is because the
problem was based on false premises.
In the theory which I contend is the correct one, this force is derived from difference
of energy potential which sunlight sets up by illuminating one face of the planet while
leaving the other m darkness. A body which is balanced between two opposing forces
(attraction and repulsion) has no weight and moves like a stone whirled round on the end
of a string, the radius of its orbit being represented by the string. All the mechanical
phenomena of the Universe are explainable.
Q: There is one great difficulty you appear to forget. If there is any logic in your
theory that planets can be maintained between the attraction of the magnetic centre of
our system and the repulsion by the light of the Sun, how can your theory be applied to
satellites? For example, how can you reconcile these factors with the problem of the
Moon's movements?
A: By the theory of centrifugal force which is what I have not yet explained. Before
showing you the solution I would like to point out the difficulties in the theory that
Earth's people have elaborated.
The Moon does not describe a truly circular orbit round the Earth. Sometimes it moves
closer and other times it moves away. The distance between the planet and the satellite
can vary by as much as 26,000 miles. If the Moon were maintained by the action of gravity
against centrifugal force, its orbit should be perfectly circular and there being a
balance of these two forces, the Moon would be unable to alter its distance from the
Earth, unless there was some inconsistency in the laws of gravitation, which would be
inadmissible. This does not take into consideration the fact that when it moves into
close orbit, the balance is upset and the satellite should be drawn towards the Earth.
The first satellite of Mars represents a curious phenomenon which completely negates your
conception of the truth; while Mars completes its axial rotation in 24 hours 37 minutes,
its satellite completes three revolutions round the planet, taking 7 hours 39 minutes per
revolution.
We are thus back to where we started, wondering what supplies the force which enables the
satellite to disobey the gravitational force of the planet and complete three revolutions
instead of one.
Even more curious is the behaviour of the ninth, tenth and eleventh satellites of
Jupiter, which utterly defy the laws of gravitation as you suppose them to be.

Message Page 4 of 9
Jupiter and its satellites move anti-clockwise, whereas the above three satellites move
in the opposite direction.
I will now show you why the Moon is held in space without colliding with the planet; it
is because it lies within the periphery of the etheric envelope which surrounds the
Earth. There is a magnetic attraction between the two bodies, the poles of the Earth
acting on the poles of the Moon and vice versa. While there is attraction between their
magnetic fields, the two bodies themselves are repelled by solar light.
Q: How?
A: Sunlight is reflected from the Moon to Earth and from the Earth to the Moon. The
combined reflective action of the two bodies supplies the necessary repulsive force to
overcome the magnetic attraction. The result is that the satellite maintains itself in
orbit. When the reflection of sunlight between the two bodies is greatest, the pressure
increases and the Moon moves away from the Earth; when, however, the Moon is waning the
reflection of light is less, which proportionally decreases the force of repulsion and
the magnetic attraction increases so that the satellite moves closer to the Earth.
FIG. 6. HOW THE MOON IS MAINTAINED IN ORBIT.
While the poles of the Moon are attracted by the Earth's poles the reflected light of the
Sun coming from the Moon causes the two bodies to repel one another, and this repulsion
balances with the magnetic attraction between them. Since the amount of reflected light
varies, so the Moan's distance from the Earth varies too. The maximum variation is about
26,ooo miles. When there is an eclipse and less moonlight reaches the Earth, the
repulsive force is thereby lessened; but as the Moon is at that moment still being
repelled by the full pressure of the sunlight from behind, it falls rapidly through space
towards the Earth. The time is, however, too short to seriously affect the orbit, and the
proper balance is restored as soon as the reflection returns after the eclipse.
This variation causes the Moon to describe a perfect ellipse around the Earth (see Fig.
6).
It is wrong to suppose that tides are caused by the attraction of the Moon. What happens
is the exact opposite; this can be proved by observation. Sunlight reflected from the
Moon exerts a pressure on the liquid mass of the ocean. Being compressed at one point,

Message Page 5 of 9
this liquid is raised up at another. This is the explanation of the retardation of tides
caused by the Moon25 (see Fig. 7).
Astronomers would run up against the same difficulty in explaining the orbits of the
planets as they did when explaining the lunar orbit, because if, in reality, the Sun did
attract them, they could not conceivably have elliptical orbits. But the movement of the
Sun around the magnetic centre of the system makes its repulsive force stronger at times,
in which case the planet moves away from it, and other times the magnetic centre is
closer to the planet and the planet moves towards it. The difference in the eccentricity
of the orbits of the various planets is due to the volume and density of each of them. So
that it is more rational to calculate the density of celestial bodies by observing their
diameter and their distance at aphelion and perihelion.
Q: But the pressure of light that is reflected between two bodies must be very small.
A: It is no less than the magnetic attraction. You can also prove for yourself that this
attraction is minimal in view of the fact that the Moon moves around the Earth in little
less than thirty days. If the attraction were strong the satellite should revolve round
the Earth at the same speed and it should not advance or lag by more than so minutes a
day.
Aristotle committed suicide by throwing himself off a cliff, because he could find no
explanation for the tides. There are two tides a day. At the Equator they reach a height
of about 30 in. at full Moon and about 20 inches. at other phases of the Moon. Tides can
be regarded as a depression in the surface of the waters, with an elevation on either
side of it-these elevations are not waves, but actual increases in the mass of water. If
the tides were caused by attraction, there would be a single wave travelling directly
under the Moon; but tides do not occur directly under the Moon, and take place 50 minutes
later each day. According to current theory this daily retardation is caused by the angle
of the Sun to the Earth at the time.
The waters of the Earth, on being compressed at one point, rise up in two other places,
and this is the cause of the tides. The reflected light from the Moon causes a
compression at one point, and the direct light from the Sun a compression at another.
Thus it is that the tides are highest at the full Moon, these two pressures then being
conjoined.
The pressure of light is not just the insignificant weight that is felt at the surface of
the Earth; there is a very great pressure on the upper layers of the atmosphere, that
gradually decreases until it reaches the surface of the planet where it is almost non-
existent. It behaves like a bullet, whose power of penetration is very high at the
beginning of its trajectory, but gradually tails off as the velocity decreases through
resistance of the atmosphere until it eventually comes to rest. This pressure of light is
transmitted through the atmosphere until it reaches the oceans.
This same compressive force of the Son's light causes winds. Pressing on the upper
etheric layers, the force is then transmitted to the atmosphere proper. The difference of
pressure on various parts of the atmosphere gives rise to air currents, and their
intensity depends on the amount of pressure acting on them at the time. Most wind
currents start near the Equator, where the pressure is greatest. However, a great deal
depends on the speed these upper sir currents are able to maintain, very often they reach
as much as 1250 miles per hour. This movable layer is subjected to the greatest pressure,
which it translates into a movement parallel with the Earth's surface. If the speed of
these upper layers drops, then the full pressure of the light of the Sun is transmitted
to the Earth. It is this which gives rise to cyclones. We should not confuse those air
currents that run parallel to the Earth's surface with the vertical ones. The former are
caused by the pressure of the Sun's light, and the latter by temperature differences in
the upper layers.

Message Page 6 of 9
Some of the great force that the waves from the Sun exert on this planet. maintaining it
in orbit, is absorbed in producing high winds in both the upper layers of the atmosphere
and those close to the Earth's surface.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Does this mean that the satellite has no movement of its own?
A: That is correct. It is merely subject to the effect, at a distance, of the Earth's

movement. The speed of the Earth's rotation produces an angular velocity on the Moon of
almost one twenty-eighth. It is as though only the axis of the Earth exerted an
attraction. This being the case there can be no attraction between the masses but there
is a magnetic attraction.
Q: Knowing all these things, how do you set about travelling though space, or better
still, how should we go about it if we were to attempt to do so?
A: I explained to you how the atmosphere can be ionised by cathode rays. The ionised
"bubble" is absorbed by the atmosphere creating a vacuum in its rear into which the
saucer is drawn, thus rising upwards. Now, the Earth develops a surface speed of 1,040
m.p.h., but no one feels it move. This means to say that if we continued to rise in
relation to a point on the Earth's surface we should be increasing our speed, but would
have no sensation of acceleration. On reaching a height of 250,000 miles from the Earth's
surface we should, without any other effort than that of going upwards, reach a speed of
66,000 m.p.h., which is equal to the speed of revolution of the planet in space. We
neither see nor feel the speed we have reached as we have no point of reference; but if
there were a stationary observer outside the etheric envelope, in which we have no
sensation of speed, he would see us moving at a terrific angular velocity.
Having reached this speed we would try to escape from the etheric coveting, falling into
the vacuum. Due to the tendency of moving bodies to move in a straight line, we would
leave the etheric envelope at a point at which the saucer, by following a straight line,
would reach the planet we wanted to get to. The procedure would, of course, be different
if we were using the "electric fluid" of the planet as our means of propulsion.
In order to explain one principle to you, I have had to omit another. I said "a straight
line" in order to simplify the reasoning, but we have, in fact, to take into
consideration the deflective action the forces of attraction and repulsion would have on
us. We would, however, follow a rectilinear course because we have means of offsetting
these differences. If we create a magnetic field with the powerful solenoids at our
disposal, we should be attracted, and if we switch off the field, we should be repelled.
That is why it is necessary to understand fully the laws of Nature, otherwise we would
not reach any planet at all.
Also for the sake of simplicity I said that we leave the Earth at a speed of 66,ooo
m.p.h. In practice the minimum escape velocity we use is 125,000 m.p.h., of which 66,000
are supplied by the Earth and the difference by the speed developed by the saucer within
the atmosphere. Sometimes we use even higher speeds which to you would seem incredible.
Nature has resources which the people of Earth have not dreamed of.
Using a speed of 66,000 m.p.h. with which the Earth provides us gratis, it would be
possible for people to attempt a journey through space and reach other planets, but there
would be certain dangers due to loss of energy though solar repulsion. It should be noted
that we move at right angles to the direction of solar repulsion.
If we were to move in the same direction we should be impelled by it, and if we were to
move in an opposite direction we should be repelled by it, in which case we would suffer
a loss of kinetic energy. Therefore a higher speed is required, as the laws of inertia
are valid to some extent.
A pilot who is used to making these flights could do so using this low speed, but it

Message Page 7 of 9
would take him a long time.
With a high escape velocity we only require fuel or 'other sources of energy in small
quantities for use within the saucer.
We can completely disconnect the Crookes and Geissler tubes which bring about the
atmospheric disturbance because we have no need for them. Once in a while they are used
to deflect meteorites that we meet with en route.
We generally connect them up when wandering meteorites appear on the screens of our
detecting apparatus.
At a certain height above the Earth's atmosphere a body begins to rotate violently. This
fact has been observed by you countless times, and it is these same factors which cause
the Earth to rotate. Under low atmospheric pressure a body illuminated on one face, with
the other in darkness, tends to rotate on itself on an imaginary axis. This is a grave
danger for the inexperienced for the same thing happens in space. In order to correct
this we heat up that part of the craft which is away from the Sun, and this maintains our
balance.
The principal technique in astro-navigation lies in establishing contact with the etheric
covering of the planet we wish to reach. We must always approach the planet in the
direction of its rotation. If we were to approach it counter to its rotation, our craft
would be broken to pieces. For this reason we approach the etheric mass at a tangent,
following the direction of its movement. Two bodies travelling in the same direction have
no relative velocity; it is as though they were both stationary. Then the contact between
them does not give rise to any friction.
I should also add that we have means of stopping and starting the saucer in space and,
naturally, of increasing or diminishing its speed. If we were travelling at 175,000
m.p.h. it would be dangerous to make contact with the etheric covering of a planet with a
low speed of rotation, even if this took place in the direction of its movement. In such
cases we reduce speed until we are moving at the same speed as the etheric covering.
This is a convenient place to explain to you the phenomenon of meteorites which reach the
planets. If they reach the etheric envelope against the direction of the planet's
rotation, they are broken to pieces, but if they come into it following the direction of
rotation they sometimes manage to reach the surface of the planet. This, however, depends
on the speed at which they reach the planet.
If we go from Earth to Jupiter, we generally use Mars or Venus as staging posts,

depending on the positions of the planets at the time.
In your case, as you would not have any reliable means of correcting your speed in space,
you should, if you were to undertake a voyage to Jupiter, proceed as follows:
Earth moves in orbit at 66,000 m.p.h., Mars at 54,O0O m.p.h. and Jupiter at 29,000 m.p.h.
The solution would be to use Mars as a staging post, and attain a speed identical to this
planet's rotation, that is to say 54,000S m.p.h. A difference of 25000 m.p.h. between
your speed and that of the ether of the planet will not produce too great a friction. In
order to prevent accidents the Geissler tubes should be switched on at the moment of
contact in order to avoid as much friction as possible. With the velocity supplied by
Mars, the journey could be continued to Jupiter, but the trip would take a long time.
No landing should be made on Jupiter itself, but on the satellites. The small etheric
envelope makes contact very dangerous, unless the craft has its own means of deceleration
in space. You should aim by preference for Ganymede, which has a large etheric envelope
and atmosphere moving at a high speed. Io can also be recommended. It would be wrong for
you to pass via Venus since this planet has a velocity of 77,000 m.p.h. and the
difference between this speed and Jupiter's would be too great.

Message Page 8 of 9
Q: What would happen if we were to stop the craft? For example, if we approached a planet
with only vertical acceleration and no horizontal acceleration?
A: You would only do this once, there would be no second time. You would be utterly
destroyed. The shock would be of unparalleled intensity. It would be as though you were
standing on a railway line and a train ran into you at high speed.
We know because many of us made this mistake and died. It was also difficult for us to
learn the secrets of space. You will not have these difficulties if you undertake a space
journey one day, because we shall have told you the dangers that can dog the steps of the
most courageous traveller.
You have only to listen to us and tell the pundits of Earth that it is wiser for an
individual to profit by the experience of others than to reach the same result at the
price of his own life. We are aware that you threaten to dominate and even to destroy us,
but we do not wish to bring about your ruin that way. On the contrary, we should sorry to
see the people of Earth fail, as we are sorry about many of the things they do.
We would prefer to see you as horsemen of space, holding the reins of a fiery chariot, or
as intrepid sailors braving the turbulent seas of the Cosmos.
Maybe men would then come to understand the grandeur of the works of God who dispensed
riches abundantly in every corner of the Universe, and see that there is no need to fight
for land and lebensraum. To fight for these things shows an ignorance of the greatness of
the Universe; man behaves like a turkey held within an imaginary circle, lacking the
intelligence to see that he needs only to take a single step to freedom.
Maybe men would also cease destroying one another in warfare over some wretched oil wells
which are no more important than holes in the ground. If they need energy, space sends it
to them from all directions by means of cosmic rays. It is as though they were dying of
thirst while sailing down the Amazon.
They have only to lower a bucket into the water and fill it as often as they wish.
If they would cease making war, and live like rational beings, we would show them how to
harness energy, be it atomic, solar, magnetic or cosmic energy. If they learn to be
peace-loving and merciful, the elder brothers in the solar system will show them how to
turn this Earth into a Garden of Eden.
Do not believe that God made the world evil, for it is His wish that all should be happy.
Nobody's suffering brings Him any satisfaction. Pain, physical or mental suffering and
difficulties in general are of no help to anybody, but only show how debased his feelings
have now become. If anything produces suffering, it is resentment and blasphemy against
Him who continually showers blessings on us.
Everyone is responsible for the misery and oppression in which he finds himself If man
changes his heart and makes up his mind to be merciful and good, he will at once have
countless brothers at his side to help him, not to mention the help and joy from on High.
Rest assured that the Father is more ready to give than the son is to ask.
If one day you should recount to others what I have told you, tell them that I,
personally, in the name of the inhabitants of my planet, assure them if one day any
country in the world decides to abandon destruction, I will come, together with thousands
of others, to give them material help and moral support.
Even if this should happen to a man instead of a country, we would still come to this
man, and not a hair on his head would perish. We do not rely on our forces. alone, but on
the paramount power of the Universe, which always supports the efforts of beings who
follow the right path.

Message Page 9 of 9
At the moment the Great Powers of Earth are preparing to make war. In a few years their
swords will be drawn, making a holocaust in honour of their Moloch, and a host of victims
will fall to the self-interest of a few potentates who stop at nothing to gain their
objectives, even at the cost of many living.
Human blindness is deplorable. Men preach peace but destroy the Earth; they talk of love
and perpetrate deeds of hatred; they believe in progress but disregard finer feelings,
becoming worse than beasts.
We have been watching the carnage on Earth for some time and we had hoped that man might
one day understand the work of God and repent. We waited for this transformation to come
about, but in vain. However fruitless our efforts may be, we have come to present
ourselves and to offer you help. In this we are obeying an order, and our hearts are glad
to be able to extend a helping hand to others.
You must be wondering why I am revealing all our knowledge without restriction. It is
because we would like to share what we have with those who have not. It is like giving
medicine to a child, if the pill is bitter we coat it with sugar.
While explaining the scientific points we are at the same time making a desperate appeal
to you to unite in the great Christian doctrine of brotherhood and to renounce wars for
ever.
It is an indication that we are ready to help you with all our resources, asking for
nothing in return save the right to call each other friends.
We are not interested in your raw materials, because we can obtain them at will by
transmutation. We would like to see your Earth and land in your cities, to live together
with the people and enjoy their company.
If we were in too much of a hurry to come down, we would greet you with a friendly dip of
the wing.
You would come to us and be able to live in our world, making use of all that we have,
because in our society, all goods are held in common. Among us the only currency is
brotherhood. We do not bargain with the gifts that God gave us, but put ourselves in the
position of being able to hand them out.
We offer our hand to you in these dire straits, and would not like it to be turned down,
hoping to take back with us a warm friendship. However, we do not expect you to have any
greater feeling of brotherhood for us than you have for each other. We would be quite
content with a small corner in the human heart when it becomes full of love for its
fellow beings.
If there should be misery as a result of wars, tell us, and we will help you. It saddens
me, however, to see that wars take place against the wishes of most people, because poor
people do not fight easily. Carnage has become the perquisite of the rich and powerful,
of those who need no help and who even renounce God, seeing no necessity for the Divine
Presence in their lives. Abundance blinded them, gluttony clouded their vision. Strife is
the product of egoism. It cannot be said that they fight for principles, for a man of
principles does not fight. The great principles that have guided the life of many men on
Earth, and which also guide life on other worlds, are love of God and of one's neighbour.

Message Page 1 of 8
SUNDRY TOPICS, Chap. 6

Q: Taking your theory that the light of the Sun repels bodies in space, and that
the tides are caused by the force of this light reflected from the Moon, why is it
that the Earth's velocity in orbit increases when the Moon crosses this orbit ahead
of the Earth, and decreases when it crosses it in the Earth's wake?
A: When the Moon is ahead of the Earth, it is obvious that the pressure of light
gives an impulse to the surface of the Moon. As the Moon is within the Earth's
magnetic field, this impulse is transmitted magnetically back to Earth as though it
were impelling the Earth from the rear. This is like a system of transmission of
forces. The opposite happens when the Moon crosses in the wake of the planet. When
the light presses upon it, it is as though it opposed the Earth.
Q: You told me that if a comet approached the Earth against the direction of the
Earth's rotation, it would be shattered. However, it seems that comets avoid
approaching other bodies, since those that come too close to the satellites of
Jupiter are deflected. Why?
A: This is again due to the force of repulsion which light exerts upon bodies. The
light from the satellites does not only fall upon the planet, but goes out in all
directions. Each satellite acts as a mirror on the comets, which are deflected by
their joint effect, and are forced to change direction.
One particular comet, for instance, approached the Sun and was at the same time
repelled by it. This resulted in an acceleration of 1,400 miles per second.
Everything depends upon the speed with which one body approaches the other, and the
position of the satellites at that moment. If the direction of the approaching body
is such that it receives the effective light of the satellites at an angle, then it
will be deviated from its path, but if this light meets it anywhere near head on,
then the comet will quite probably reach the planet, having sufficient acceleration
to overcome the repulsive force of the light.
This is what happened to Saturn. A comet entered the solar system, demolished a
satellite in its path, and both satellite and comet were transformed into a huge
ring. The fragments of the comet and of the satellite can still be seen in this
ring, forming concentric circles according to the density of their matter.
Q: You spoke, also, of an envelope of ether around the Earth; however, Michelson in
his famous experiment found no ether.
A: He found none, nor could it be found. The retardation which he thought to find
in the speed of light, owing to the resistance of the ether, could not exist if the
ether moves with the same angular velocity as the Earth. When two bodies develop
identical velocity in the same direction, they remain in the same relative
positions. It does not matter what the speed is to an observer outside the system;
it is a question of relative velocity between two points in the same system. A mass
M may rotate at any speed; the important thing is to observe whether two points of
the mass move at different speeds. The most difficult problems can be explained
with the simplest illustrations. If a fly takes off from the rear of a bus
travelling at high speed, and flies to the front in is seconds, would it take more

Message Page 2 of 8
than is seconds for it to fly back to the rear of the bus?
Q: No, it takes the same time because it is flying inside the vehicle.
A: Exactly, it takes the same time. Let us now suppose that one person is seated in
the rear and another in front; the one behind throws a ball to the other in front,
who returns it. If the ball is thrown with the same force in each direction, it
should take the same time to go as it takes to come back. You see that the speed of
the bus is external, that is to say in relation to points outside the bus. Inside
the bus there is no speed. Michelson should have reasoned his experiment out in the
same way; light being like thr ball going from one part of the bus to another,
without any loss of speed. It could no more be retarded in relation to the ether
than the ball in relation to the atmosphere. It-is as though one were to say there
is no atmosphere because it did not cause the ball to loose velocity when the bus
was travelling at high speed.
However, Michelson is not to be blamed. The blame lies with those who thought that
the ether was universal and stationary in relation to Earth. On this false premise,
anybody would have come to the same erroneous conclusion. If a minor premise in a
syllogism is wrong, the conclusion is wrong, just as it is if a major premise is
involved. False theories produce wrong results. As far as that experiment was
concerned, it was a false premise on which the people of Earth have elaborated a
whole theory. We must therefore go back to first principles.
Michelson found a constant for the speed of light. Is this constant correct? The
answer is no. If he found that the ether had no retarding effect on light, it was
because:
(1) There can be no retardation in the movement of a body if all points of its mass
move with the same speed. That is to say that ether has the same impulse as light,
less its velocity.
(2) The medium was a homogeneous one.
(3) The basis of measurement was very small (12 yd.).
(4) Retardation of light due to the resistance of the medium should be sought by
comparing two different media, say air and water.
(5) Light is only visible on the planet if it has a speed of i86,000 miles per
second.
Let us take this a stage further; the resistance which Michelson sought and did not
find is to be found in a mirror which reflects light, because a resistance is set
up by the barrier, in this case the mirror, in the process of reflection.
In water, for example, the reflection is never complete because part of the light
is absorbed. This shows that there is pressure, resistance and absorption. On
looking at the Moon, we notice that this reflected light is softer. In this case
some of the visible light falls to a lower frequency and becomes invisible on
account of this resistance by the barrier.
It depends on what we call light. Something which is darkness for you may be
flooded with light for me.
A single pressure on the eyeball or the optic nerve can demonstrate this fact.
There are species of animals which see in another frequency range and for them

Message Page 3 of 8
night is day and vice versa. Infra red rays are a form of invisible light and their
speed is much less than that of visible light. Again, chemical, actinic or ultra-
violet rays are invisible light and travel with much greater speed than visible
light, as they have much higher frequencies; that is, always assuming that the
speed equals frequency times wavelength.
If we say that visible light travels in space with a speed of 186,000 miles per
second, we should be right; but we should be wrong if we thought that this speed
constant applied to waves of different frequency ranges.
We must consider certain aspects of the problem. For their propagation, these rays
require a medium adapted to their wavelength and frequency. Heat rays, or infra-red
rays, require a dense medium, for they cannot pass through a vacuum.
Visible light can travel in a semi-vacuum and in a dense medium to a certain

extent, but not as well as infra-red rays do.
In an absolute vacuum there is no propagation of light. This can better be seen in

the so-called holes in space, such as the "Coal Sack" in the Milky Way. In a
Geissler tube also, it can be seen that light ceases to cast a shadow when the
pressure within the tube is very low. However, a vacuum is the ideal medium for the
propagation of waves above the frequency of visible light.
Looking at the problem in this way, the light that reaches the Earth's surface is
modified. If this were not so, the chemical rays would destroy life on Earth.
Behold the wisdom of God, who protects the planets close to the Sun by giving them
a cloak of dense atmosphere and ether, and gives those distant ones, whose speed of
revolution is low, a thin covering.
The modification of solar light can be seen at sunrise or sunset, when it is red,
whereas at midday it is white. This modification from white to red takes place over
a distance of 6,758 km., equal to the equatorial radius of Earth, which is the
extra distance the light must travel to reach the observer, compared with the light
at midday. While the latter has to penetrate 400,822 km. of ether, the light of the
rising Sun has to travel 407,200 km. Between white and red light there is a
difference of 30,000 mgcs. per second. If the light loses 30,000 mgcs. in 6,758
km., how much will it lose in 407,200?
If the wavelength remains the same and the frequency is considerably increased,
this must mean that the waves from the Sum reach the Earth's etheric covering at a
much higher speed as shown by the formula:
Wavelength = distance travelled through etheric covering/ over 1
We can see the same thing in the difference of the speed of light in the
atmosphere. and in water. It is only 140,000 miles per second in water, as opposed
to i86,000 in the atmosphere. Therefore, density has a considerable effect on its
speed.
Light which becomes visible on reaching the Earth's surface reaches the etheric
envelope of the Earth at a speed of 6,250,000 miles per second; and light that is
above the visible spectrum on reaching the Earth arrives at far higher speeds. For
the Sun emits its energy at various wavelengths and at different frequencies. Its
emission is never uniform.
We have reached a point where we can say that the light of the Sun exerts on

Message Page 4 of 8
Earth a pressure equal to the weight of light, measured at the Earth's surface,
plus the energy lost in traversing the 400,000 km. of etheric mass. If we consider
that the effect is twofold, since this "fatigue" of light is progressive or in
geometrical progression, we can arrive at an approximate idea of what that means.
Q: Why a twofold effect?
A: Because, as light loses weight, its frequency falls correspondingly and this, in
turn, is a factor.
Having thus obtained the pressure of solar light, and reasoning that Earth's
stability in orbit is due to the equilibrium between the forces of attraction and
repulsion, it is evident that the magnetic field that causes the attraction must
exactly counterbalance the force of repulsion; we can then determine the flux
density of the magnetic field.
The Danish scientist Olaf Roemer established the speed of light in 1676. as the
result of observations he made of eclipses of an inner satellite of Jupiter.
Together with his teacher Cassini he observed an eclipse of this satellite when the
Earth was in conjunction with Jupiter and again when it was in opposition; the
second eclipse taking place 1,002 seconds later than predicted. They came to the
conclusion that the retardation was due to the Earth's position in relation to
Jupiter, and that as the diameter of the Earth's orbit was 300 million km ,then the
speed of light must equal this figure divided by the 1,000 second delay, that is to
say 300,000 km. per second.
Waves above the visible spectrum may well have reached the Earth long before that,
travelling at far higher speeds than the visible ones. The speed of waves in the
visible spectrum is actually 300,000 km. per second, but this does not mean to say
that energy of a higher frequency is limited to this low speed.
Light is therefore not necessarily the fastest moving energy in space.
The visible spectrum covers a band of several frequencies, there is a great

difference between the wavelength of red and violet light. Chemical rays have a far
higher speed of transmission than light. We must bear in mind that our power of
sight which only operates on one octave is very limited. It is possible that
certain birds are able to see on other wavelengths, which are invisible to us. A
raven, for example, can see in complete proves that even at night there is energy
in space. This energy may very well be beyond our range of perception. If man had
the power of vision that certain animals possess, and then verified the speed of
the light that he was seeing with, his results would certainly be different to
ours. If he then built up a relativist theory with these data his conception of the
Universe would also be very different to ours. Relativist science can therefore
only show us the world as perceived by our senses, and never the ultimate Universe,
where phenomena beyond our perception take place.
Man is an egocentric being. For a long time he believed the Earth was the centre of
the Universe. When this theory was disproved, he came to believe that the Universe
was the result of our limitations, as though wishing to impose his will on Nature
by disbelieving anything beyond his senses. He believes that he is the ne plus
ultra of Creation; there can be no intelligence superior to his, there can be no
life outside the Earth, there can be no beings greater than he, man is the only god
there is. There can be no other light than that which he sees, in fact nothing

Message Page 5 of 8
exists that does not come within the scope of man's arrogant self-assertion.
Q: Notwithstanding the explanation you have just given, Olaf Roemer noted that
light took a certain time to cover the distance represented by the diameter of the
Earth's orbit, and on this basis calculated its speed at i86,000 miles per
second,which tallies with the results obtained by other experiments. How do you
explain this?'
A: I have never studied Roemer's mathematical data, but as the results of his
experiments are at complete variance with the facts, let us study the optical
phenomena which appear to take place in space and which are in fact illusions.
Roemer must definitely have taken one of these phenomena into his calculations.
In the first place we need to know more about the movements of the Sun. All the
planets move in a given plane which we can call the equatorial plane of the system.
The Sun, however, revolves around the magnetic centre in a different plane which,
to be exact, lies at an angle of 460 to the mean plane of the planets.
The first optical effect that this gives rise to is to make it appear to the
inhabitants of a planet that the angle of the planet's axis in relation to the
Sun changes as the planet moves round in its orbit every year, giving greater
illumination to its northern hemisphere when the Sun is rising towards its upper
node, and its southern when the Sun is going down into its lower node; we are also
subject to the illusion that the Sun describes a pendulum-like movement in space.
It is true that the orbits of all the planets are inclined to a certain extent, but
for the most part this is optical illusion, due to the movement of the Sun.
The true inclination is due to the Sun exerting a downward pressure and pushing the
planet down in its orbit, when rising in its own plane of revolution; and pushing
the planet upward when going down in its plane of revolution. The remainder is
optical illusion due to the fact that the displaced Sun is taken as a fixed point
of reference, which gives the appearance that all the planets are also displaced.
The Sun moves around the magnetic centre in an orbit of 6,250,000 miles in diameter
and completes one revolution in 355 days.
Thus it is that the ancient astronomers based their calculations on a year of 355
days. which is the true solar year, and not the movement that the Earth describes
around the magnetic centre, which takes 365 days.
Roemer observed two eclipses of Jupiter at an interval of 2oo days. In this time,
the Sun had moved though approximately half of its orbit, and was 6,125,000 miles
from its original position. This shift in the Sun's position caused the eclipse to
take place at a different time.
If a point or a satellite were casting a shadow on Jupiter, the change in the Sun's
position in 200 days would have made a change of several miles in the position of
the shadow. If the satellite revolves at a given distance from Jupiter, this would
cause an apparent retardation of approximately 1,000 seconds in the time of the
eclipse, depending on the satellite's distance from the planet. What I mean is that
the satellite would still have about 1,000 seconds to go before the predicted
eclipse would actually take place. This is why Roemer's calculation was incorrect.
In the second place, we need to take note of the angle at which Jupiter was seen

Message Page 6 of 8
from the Earth. If we had the exact time of the eclipse we could work out how far
the planet had moved in that time, and we could then make our calculation with
accuracy. But in any case the eclipse can be said to have taken place at a given
time in relation to a point on Jupiter, but owing to the angle of observation we
would get an impression of relative retardation. Let us take an example:
let us place two bodies in such a way that from the point of observation an
imaginary line from the observer to them would touch the surface of each at a
tangent. If we move the bodies from this position, the line also moves. In this
case one of the bodies would have to move again for the imaginary line to meet it
at a tangent. This is the second factor which may have passed unnoticed to any
observer, however attentive he may have been.
Roemer could have made an error in calculation due to one of these phenomena,
either of which would have brought him into error.
Q: Has the angle of the ecliptic any effect on the spirit of human beings?
A: None at all. External factors do not affect the spirit, but only internal ones.
Good and evil derive from the heart. What virtue would there be in man being good
if this were the result of conditions for which he was not responsible? The same
thing would apply to evil.
If we give a man an injection which causes him to go mad, and he then goes berserk,
no blame can be attached to him. How could God expect man to be good if He placed
him in such adverse conditions? God does not tempt anyone. Evil is the result of
arrogance and the audacity of man in disregarding the divine laws.
If what you say were true, other planets would be far worse off, the
Earth's angle to the ecliptic is 23 degrees 25',
Mars, which you consider very advanced, 25 degrees 12',
Venus 32 degrees,
Saturn 26 degree 45'
Neptune 29 degrees and
Uranus 68 degrees.
Uranus then, would be in a state of moral depravity. Spirit creates conditions, and
never vice versa. The good people on Earth would be good even if the poles were
reversed, and the evil-doers, even if there were no angle of inclination, or if
they were in Paradise, would continue in the same way.
One should not confuse virtues with phenomena of a mechanical order. Good has
nothing to do with gear wheels.
Q: Why is there a difference in the colour of light reflected from different

planets. Mars is reddish and the others white, yet the light all comes from the
Sun.
A: It is due to the chemical light.

Message Page 7 of 8
Q: What is the chemical light?
A: Sunlight always maintains its direction of focus on its journey through space,
whereas the other, chemical light, is diffuse. It originates from the passage of
energy though hydrogen and sodium layers on the Sun. If one looks at a shadow, one
will see an illuminated band which represents this diffused light.
If it were not for this chemical light, many planets would be invisible. At the
distance which Pluto is from the Sun, its light would not otherwise be seen. The
Sun, seen from Pluto, is small and the amount of energy it receives is
insignificant. However, this little planet shines in space, giving off a light of
0.16, whereas Mercury, which is close to the Sun, only gives off 0.058."
This is due to the fact that Pluto's atmosphere is extremely sensitive to solar
waves and sets up a violent reaction to this very small quantity of energy.
We should bear in mind that Earth, in spite of its relative proximity to the Sun,
is considered by terrestrial science to be a very poor reflector of light.
The Earth's reflection is given as 0.039, but other more distant planets have a
greater reflective capacity; Jupiter 0.51, Saturn 0.5, Uranus 0.66 and Neptune 0.62
The light that we see on planets is the modified light of the Sun and also the
physiochemical light. The resultant light depends on the intensity of the latter.
Pluto's light is not of solar origin as this light, on reaching the planet, drops
too much in frequency to be reflected. The small amount of light that Pluto
receives would be insignificant if it alone were reflected back into space.
There are other optical phenomena which would take us a long time to explain, but I
can tell you that the function of light consists largely in creating conditions in
space by which various phenomena can be perceived at a distance.
This is not the moment to discuss metaphysics.
*27 The amount of light that a planet reflects back into space is known as the
Albedo.
Q: Although you do not wish to go into metaphysics, I would like you to give me
one example, if that is possible. I gather from your words that light has to reach
us for us to be able to see a phenomenon taking place at a distance.
A: I will give you an example: in an ordinary Geissler tube, electrons are unable
to penetrate the walls of the tube, or, for that matter, any other material except
alumimum. This has been proved experimentally by placing a cross inside the tube in
the electron beam. This cross causes a shadow, showing that the electrons were
stopped. Even if this cross were made of glass, the electrons would not go through
it.
So, if light or electrons are incapable of going through glass, how, I ask, can one
see shadows and Faraday bands inside the lighted tube. Light could not get out of
the tube, yet one could see into it.
I could quote many other examples, but one is enough to disprove the theory. We
should not confuse light and image because universal phenomena take place
everywhere at the same time. It would take a very long time to explain this in
detail.

Message Page 8 of 8
Q: Some people say that the heat observed on Earth comes to us from the Sun. Is
there any truth in this?
A: Heat comes from the Sun, but in the form of high frequency waves, which are then
transformed into heat waves. This transformation takes place in the atmosphere of
the planets. They do not come from the Sun in the form of heat because heat will
not travel through a vacuum. Even the heat on the Sun is bearable, it is merely a
field in which electrical forces operate.
A generator is cold, but the currents it produces can give rise to high
temperatures. It is nonsense to say that temperatures of several million degrees
exist on the Sun. Its luminosity is not related to its heat; on Earth there are
also sources of cold light. A neon bulb shows that light is not always hot. Many
insects develop cold light, as well as certain vegetables which produce a
luminescence by bacteriological action.
Besides the heat that is developed by the frequency of the Sun s rays, heat is also
developed by the pressure of the light of the Sun. At sunrise the oblique rays of
the Sun do not exert any pressure and one has the impression that the Sun is a
large red disc of no power; but when it is at its zenith one can sense the
intensity of its rays pushing against the ground. That is why we feel colder the
higher we go.
At the Equator, where the Sun's rays pour down at right angles, the heat is great.
At the poles, these rays are to a very great extent repelled by the magnetic
effect, and the pressure is very small. So, the polar cold is the result of
obliqueness of the Sun's rays and their deflection by the magnetic effect.
Some aurorae are the result of electrical reactions in the ionosphere, but others
are due to the deflection of rays at a height giving rise to luminosity in the
upper reaches of the atmosphere.
Q: You say that it gets colder as we go up, but this is not always the case. At a
certain altitude the thermometer goes up to 22000 F.
A: The heat that is encountered at these altitudes derives from the physiochemical
reaction that I mentioned. Various layers produce this reaction.
So you see, my friend, your science contains many errors. I am not surprised at
this because things in life are not judged by the errors they may contain but by
their truth. We are all imperfect, therefore perfection is an attribute which can
only be found complete in divinity. In us, it is always mingled with defects, the
defects often predominating.
What surprises and pains me is that scientists of Earth should continue to put
their trust in their false science. In spite of all its errors they have been
unable to rectify and to deny the supreme science which is God. They are like glow-
worns enamoured of their own light, crying out to other glowworms, "The Sun does
not exist; the light in my tail is the only light there is.

OLAF ROEMER'S EXPERIMENT, Chap. 7

OLAF ROEMER'S conclusions regarding the speed of light certainly appear to be false. This Danish scientist
noted that the eclipse of Jupiter's satellite lo always took place slightly later than the predicted time.
Having taken note of the time of the eclipse when the Earth was in opposition to Jupiter, he calculated the exact
time at which a subsequent eclipse should occur, 200 days later, when the Earth went into conjunction with
Jupiter. His actual observations showed that the eclipse took place approximately 1000 seconds later than
predicted.
On the basis of Galileo's ideas, who postulated a speed of light, he calculated that this retardation must be due
to the time that light took to travel across the diameter of the Earth's orbit. Taking this diameter as 300 million
km. he merely divided this by the 1,000 seconds retardation and arrived at a figure of 300,000 km. per second for
the speed of light.
Fig. 8 shows the position of the planets concerned at that time.
FIG. 9.
It is, however, not difficult to disprove Roemerr's reasoning. Let us take Fig. 9 and
resolve it trigonometrically.

Let us suppose that the Earth was in position E.1 in its orbit at the time of the first
eclipse. If we take its position at E.2, we will see that the eclipse will already have
taken place so that an observer at E.1 will note a delay in the time of the eclipse, and
at E.2 an advance. The time difference observed can be mathematically shown as follows:
Distance Sun E.1 = 149,000,000 km.
Distance Sun Jupiter = 780,000,000 km.
Distance Jupiter I0(a) = 400,000 km.
Distance Jupiter IO(b) = 400,000 km.
allowing for trigonometric corrections due to lines of sight passing 70,000 km. from
centre of Jupiter.
We then get the following:
Distance Sun/E1
----------------------- = 0.1910
Tan Distance Sun/Jupiter
Distance Jupiter/Io(a)
------------------------- = 76,400 km
Tan Distance Io(a)/Io(b)
Io's velocity in orbit around Jupiter is 20.67 km. per second, we can therefore see that
the difference in time between a sighting from the Earth in position E.1 and from the
position E.2 is:
76,400 km.
-------------- = 3 696 seconds
20.67 km. per second -
This means that a movement of the Earth in its orbit through 90 degree
causes a time difference in an eclipse of Io of 3696 seconds.
When Roemer reached the conclusion that there was a retardation due to the speed of
light, the Earth had, at that time, moved through 197degree 122 degree in its orbit.
Seeing that the Earth had moved in its orbit from position A to position B (Fig. 10) in
this time, we can, for the purpose of trigonometry, consider it to have reached point C,
which gives a difference of only 17.12 degree between position A and position C.

Fig. 11 shows how points in an orbit can be projected on an
exterior point. On this scale,90 degrees corresponds to 100 per cent,
17 degrees corresponds to 29 per cent. Using this as a basis for the calculation, we get
3,696 seconds X 29
-------------------- = 1,071 seconds
100
There is a difference between our calculations and Roemer's of 71 seconds because we do

not know the exact position of Jupiter when the eclipse took place. Eclipses of Jupiter
and Io take pLace every 42 hours 28 minutes 33 seconds.
It is possible that Roemer based his calculations on an observation after or before the
eclipse, and any variation would alter the result. Further, the data we are using are
approximate. Jupiter may have been nearer or farther away from the Earth. Neither can we
be sure that Io's distance from Jupiter is constant, as in the case of our Moon, where
the distance varies as much as 42000 km. Any of these factors may have accounted for the
difference.
But in any case the retardation noted certainly exists, but is not due to the speed of
light, but due to an optical effect which can be clearly illustrated by trigonometry.

We do not entirely deny that light has a certain speed at which it moves through space,
we are merely pointing out Roemer's false assumptions which science has not troubled to
revise, even though much research has been put into it since Roemer's day.
The fact is that no one would have thought it possible for a great personage to have made
an error of trigonometry, especially as he was considered infallible. Right or wrong they
accepted his conclusions.
As Roemer's deductions are false, it would be difficult to see how the relativist theory
of physics would have developed without them, as the speed of light was the cornerstone
of the whole theory.
We do not guarantee the absolute correctness of our calculations, but we do maintain that
the time of an eclipse is advanced or retarded according to the position the planets
occupy in space, quite independently of the speed of light, if this exists at all. If it
does exist then it must move through our system with a speed that makes it virtually
instantaneous.
However, we must also consider that contrary to our analysis, anyone versed in astronomy
could raise the objection that Roemer did not base his calculations on the apparent
eclipse that Io undergoes every 42 hours, but on its real eclipse due to its entry into
the penumbra that is formed on the face of-a planet opposite the Sun.
However, if this objection were raised, it would be equally inconsistent as the penumbra
also alters its position as the planet moves in its orbit through space, as shown in Fig.
12.
It is immaterial whether the lines Aji or CJ2 were lines of sight or were made by the
light of the Sun, as both are the same. It is evident that Jupiter's continued movement
in orbit would bring about a difference between a line of sight of an observer on Earth
and that of the light of the Sun which makes the penumbra. In any case in Roemer's
observations these lines coincide exactly and the variation amounts to 1,071 seconds,
The above illustration is only given to show the reader that a certain phenomenon may
have various explanations with very divergent results. One cannot come to hasty
conclusions without viewing the problem from all angles. It is not the intention to
discredit the work of this famous scientist, who is worthy of our respect.
In the first edition of this book we refrained from inserting the full explanation of
the captain's point of view. As the phenomenon of light and space is of fundamental
interest to the whole of physics, and can even be considered the keystone to all science,
we enlisted the opinion of various European universities and some famous physicists.
Where we first mentioned Roemer's calculations to the captain of the flying saucer, he
stated he was not conversant with his theory, but gave us various explanations of the
possible traps that Roemer could have fallen into. His views are given in the following
pages.

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Q: It is a pity that you cannot give a full explanation of this phenomenon as this would
be of great value to us. To take a concrete example: on the basis of the phenomenon
observed by Olaf Roemer, science ceased to believe in God. The scientists reasoned as
follows:
They say that God is light, or akin to light. But if there is a time lag in the movement
of light through space, then light cannot be said to be ubiquitous; God could therefore
not be omnipresent since He would need time to get from place to place. Then, as there
could be no real God subject to time and space, they concluded that He did not exist. If
He is not omnipresent, it must be because He is finite rather than infinite and could not
therefore sustain the Universe. No finite principle could be God.
This is, succinctly, the reasoning behind scientific materialism. If it is your wish to
make us believe in God, you will never achieve this without a clear analysis of the
principles that science has espoused. It is, indeed, not strange that you are not
familiar with Roemer's calculations, because he never published them. It is said that
after his death, his work was virtually destroyed and only came to be known through one
of his friends publishing his findings.
However, the details on which science bases its conclusions are known to me, and I can
quote them from memory. Perhaps if we examine these, we could arrive at a definite
conclusion on which you can give your opinion.
A: (after having studied the mathematical background).
In the light of your information I can now give you a rapid review of the question. Let
me have some sheets of paper and I will draw some diagrams by way of explanation. Let us
look at the following diagram:
If the Sun were to revolve round the planets instead of vice versa, and if we noted the
time of an eclipse with the Sun in position as S.1, and again in position S.2, we would
note an advance in the time of the eclipse. That is, in position S.2 the eclipse would
already have taken place. Now try and follow the reasoning very carefully.
The phenomenon is, however, unaltered by the fact that Jupiter revolves round the Sun. I
do not know whether this comes in the scope of the "rational mechanics" on Earth, but

there is a principle which states that all bodies moving in an orbit are subject to
advance or retardation depending on the position they occupy in space.
Let us see how this operates with the aid of another diagram:
The horizontal lines represent the "line of sight" observation of the eclipses having
regard for the direction of the planet's movement in orbit which in this case is anti-
clockwise. The point at which this line of sight makes a tangent to the planet we will
call A.
In this case we have to presuppose the existence of an equatorial diameter which is not
included in your calculations. This is shown in the diagram as the line AF.
Note that in the case of the first eclipse the line of sight made a tangent to the planet
at A, and in the case of the second eclipse it made a tangent at F.
The difference, therefore, is equal to the equatorial diameter, or in other words, the
diameter of Jupiter. Note again that in the first eclipse lo was in position L1, and
farthest away from the Sun, whereas in the case of the second eclipse it was in position
L2 and between the Sun and Jupiter. Now we begin to see the reasons for the time lag
which you maintain is due to the limited speed of light by which you try to banish God
from the Universe.
To begin with, we do not know the exact distance of Jupiter from the Earth at the time of
the eclipse. I will also take this opportunity to call your attention to a mistake made
by astronomers which has a considerable bearing on the dimensions of the Universe, as we
shall see later.
According to the astronomical data we have here, Earth should have moved through 197.122
degree of its orbit in 200 days, taking its mean sidereal day as O.98561 degree . Then
deducting 1800 we are left with 17.122degrees, which, for the purposes of calculation,
brings the planet back into its position of opposition.
In this time, Jupiter, with a mean sidereal day of only 0.08309 degree would have moved
through 16.618, but this does not make sense, as with both planets moving in the same
direction, there should be no difference in the angle at which Jupiter is seen from the
Earth.
Now let us take this angle as a starting point; in 2oo days Io will have completed 113
revolutions of the planet. Yet Roemer could not have seen an eclipse either at the exact
time of opposition or of conjunction, as the angle of sight was not wide enough to allow
him to see this, He must have seen it happening before opposition and after conjunction.
As the satellite completes 113 revolutions in 200 days, two further eclipses will bring
it to 115,thus making the number of days to 2031/2. The angle that Jupiter moves through

between opposition and conjunction with the Earth is 17.122degree. This would vary
slightly in perihelion or aphelion due to the difference in speed brought about by the
pressure of sunlight.
Jupiter's mean sidereal day is in the region of 0.08561 degree, with the corrections
that we have made, so that if we add 3 1/2 days we would get a total of 17.47 degree. Let
us say 17.45d egree to simplify the calculation.
If we can accept these figures, we can make a further diagram:
We saw that in Fig. 14 a movement of i80 degree of the Earth in its orbit will have
brought about an inversion of the points at which the line of sight makes a tangent to
the planet. In the first position the line touches A and in the second, 180 degree later,
at F. But this inversion takes place slowly as the planet moves through space. Thus it is
that with only 17.45 degree of movement the line of sight AP moves round to AQ, since we
made it intersect exactly at point A. In this case the line AQ cuts through part of the
planet forming an arc. The retardation occasioned by the movement of 17.45 degree will be
found to be equal to this arc.
We now only need to see how to do the calculation with the aid of a further diagram.

FIG. 16.
We can work this out by various means but we have adopted the one which is most easily
shown graphically. We can now see how the phenomenon takes place. The line AQ determines
a point of intersection on the circumference of a planet, which we shall call B. From
this point we make a line from the circumference to the centre at E. EB is then equal to
the equatorial radius of Jupiter and is the same as EA. From point B we draw a line at
right angles to EA which will meet the latter at C. The retardation of the planet after
moving through ~7.45 degree will therefore equal the distance AC.
Let us further work out what this distance represents in time. The angle EB EA is 33.80
or sin 0.558 the angle BC BA is 17.45 degree or tan 0.32O1.
Equatorial radius of Jupiter = EB = BA
Sin EB =BC
Tan BC = AC = 13000 km.
Having established the distance AC as 13,000 km., we now only need to convert this into
seconds. Jupiter moves in its orbit at a speed of 13 km. per second.
13,000 km.
----------- = 1,000 seconds
13 km./seconds
Roemer observed a time difference of 1,000 seconds, which we also found. He attributed
this to the time that light takes to cover the distance across the Earth's orbit; we have
shown that this extraordinary hypothesis which led scientists to banish God from the
Universe has a perfectly simple trigonometrical explanation. It was excusable for him to
have made a mistake, because we all make plenty, but it is the conclusions which have
been drawn from it which are not so excusable.
This would be more than sufficient to demonstrate the irrationality of Earth's people
when they speak of a speed of light, and when they use this to support their materialist

theories of limitation and curvature of space. But let us continue the reasoning and see
whether our calculations are accurate.
When Jupiter was in position J.I and the Earth in opposition, the points ABC all
coincided at point A, but when the planet had moved to position J.2 these points were
moved as the line AP proceeded to form the line AQ. If we were to move the planet
gradually back from the position J.2 through the ~7.45 degree that it had covered, we
would see that the line AQ would eventually become the line AP, and that the points B and
C would move closer together until they coincided at point A.
In the next figure we can see the variations of the movement of the equatorial axis we
mentioned.
Fig. 17.
At the starting point 0 degree, points AB and C coincide and the line of sight is at
right angles to the equatorial axis AF. As the planet moves so do points B and C, making
a triangle whose area increases in relation to the angle the axis makes to the Sun. At 45
degree the distance between A and B is at a maximum and begins to decrease again until
the 90 degee position, but the line AC continues to lengthen which means that the time
noted for the eclipse will be changed very little. At the 90 degree position it will be
seen that B and C coincide completely at F, when the relative time difference will be
equal to the equatorial axis or diameter.
From that position to the 180 degree position, the position of points B and C is inversed
and they again move towards point A; point B again moving round the circumference towards
point A. We also notice that in this phase the triangle formed by ABC is on the opposite
side of the baseline AF. At the 180 degree position, points ABC are again coincident.
However, the time difference is equal to that of the diameter of the planet, as the line
of sight of an eclipse must now pass through point F and no longer through point ABC, as
was the case with the planet in the 0 degree position.
Having shown this, it would be easy to check the diameter of Jupiter and in consequence
the optical problem. Let us proceed as follows (see Fig. 16):
If the line AC 13,000 km. the diameter of the planet will be
13,000 km.

------------ =40,612 km. = BC
0.3201
where 0.3201 tan angle BC BA
BC __ 40,612
Sin = EB =72,780km
EB - 0.558
Having obtained the equatorial radius of Jupiter, you can compare this with the radius
obtained by optical measurement, and you will find a percentage difference between the
two. This would be due to the defraction of light as in the case of the Sun appearing
larger at sunrise or sunset than it does at midday. This is why I told you beforehand
what I based my calculations on, to avoid contradicting terrestrial mathematics. Thus it
is that the mass and the volume of Jupiter are not exactly those given by you.
If Jupiter unwittingly contributed to the establishment of scientific materialism on

Earth, what we have now shown may well mean that she will be able to supply the proof of
the error of existing theories. We have seen that, like other planets, its speed of axial
rotation is equal to its velocity in orbit. This axial rotation, which you have not
thought of, explains the peculiarities of Mercury. Astronomers observing the planet on
its equatorial plane have noted that it rotates once on its axis for each revolution in
orbit, yet this is not the whole story.
It is the same effect as we saw in the case of Jupiter; science maintaining erroneously
that light takes a certain amount of time to move through space. In the case of Mercury,
science maintains equally erroneously that it revolves once on its axis for every
revolution in orbit.
What happens is that Mercury has a very rapid axial rotation. This does not take place on
the equatorial plane of the solar system, but at right angles to it. Mercury is really a
satellite of the Sun and not, strictly speaking, a planet, because only satellites have
this peculiarity.
Having put this detail right, we can go much further. We can disprove the theory of
relativity and Planck's quantum theory. Planck observed radiation in dark bodies and
finding no explanation for this in the wave theory of light, he established the quantum
theory to show the discontinuity of energy. Roemer's fallacious theory of light lent him
support.
Now an electron, as a wave form, is moved in an anti-clockwise circle. In this spiraloid

movement it has a discontinuous wave surface rather like a spiral spring. The movement
itself is not discontinuous, but only appears so by virtue of its spiralling movement. It
also shows a magnetic phenomenon cancelling out the charge on one side which gives an
observer the impression that the energy moves in jumps. Further, it is subject to the
outcome of the difference of charge due to this magnetic effect, as well as the result of
its rotation, behaving like a globe, as a planet does in relation to the Sun.
This is a rough resume of the quantum theory which physicists boast of. The whole thing
is a misinterpretation of simple trigonometrical phenomena.
Before denying God on the basis of this reasoning they should ask the Father for insight
as He is the only one who can reveal His secrets. No one will be able to penetrate the
Universe with the support of only a very limited power of reasoning.
The Universe is a house with an owner, and nobody, however rational he may be, can enter
without the owner's consent. Let them ask the owner to accompany them and show them the

peculiarities and details of every room. They should not try to emulate the toad who,
wishing to be like an ox, swallowed so much air that his stomach swelled up and burst.
Man will not achieve anything by breathing the air of complicated theories in the hope
of increasing his stature. True growth is always accompanied by humility. Science is a
majestic palace with a narrow, low doorway which is barred to the proud. Here only the
humble find reward, and those without faith and humility towards their Creator find
nothing but confusion.
The foregoing were the words of our informant showing us the changes on Jupiter which
gave the impression that there was a time factor involved in the movement of light
through space, whereas this, in fact, was due to a trigonometrical phenomenon.
For people who are used to dealing with mathematical problems this simple demonstration
will be sufficient for them to draw their conclusions and to correlate the movement of
the satellite. But as this book was written for the general public, who may not have had
time to go deeply into these matters, we will endeavour to illustrate the movement of the
satellite lo in the simplest possible manner.
The arc formed by the line AB in Fig. 16 should be equal to 42,422 km. In 200 days time,
the line AP (see Fig. 18) will only touch the circumference at a tangent. However, the
movement that a point in the circumference would undergo in this time is:
42,4.22
------------ _ = 21,211 km. = AM = BM
If the position of point A moves the above number of kilometres in 200 days, this means
that point A moves at a speed of 106 km per day.
The speed of IO in space is high, but low in relation to the surface of Jupiter, that is
to say that it has a lower angular velocity. Thus the speed of IO in relation to the
speed of the surface of the planet is only 3 km. per second.
Let us now study Fig. 18 again. At the time of the observation at opposition Io must
have been at point P. At the time of conjunction it must have been at point Q. In
reality, however, 1,ooo seconds before the eclipse took place, it must have been at R, RQ

representing the distance it moved in 1,000 seconds. In order to explain this, let us
consider the following:
Science reckoned that Io completed a revolution in orbit every 152,913 seconds, that
being the time required for the satellite to leave a point of reference and return to
that same point again. The light of the Sun was taken as a reference point, by observing
the exact moment which Io entered the penumbra. However, the light of the Sun,
represented by the line AQ, moves at the rate of 106 km. per day. This change also
changes the time of Io's movement through space, since the calculation of this movement
is based on the line AQ. If the change in the surface of Jupiter is 106 km. per day, and
if Io has a relative velocity of 3 km. per second, this means that the change brought
about in the line AQ alters the timing of Io's observed movement by 35 seconds per day.
Thus the true time of Io's revolution in orbit is 152,878 seconds and not 152,913
seconds.
At the rate of 35 seconds per day there will be a difference of 7,000 seconds in 200
days. If it moves in orbit at 20 km. per second, this will amount to 140,000 km., which
is the distance between points P and R on Fig. 18. From this it will be seen that at the
moment when the eclipse was expected to take place, Io was still at point R, it still had
to cover the distance RQ before the eclipse could actually be seen.
Distance RQ is 20,000 km., and with a speed of 20 km. per second Io would move from R to
Q in 1,000 seconds,
20,000
ie --------------
20 km./second.
Having shown this, one can conclude that light moves instantaneously through space. At a
time when knowledge of astronomy was slight and when many people found it difficult even
to believe that the Earth moved round the Sun, it would have been very difficult for
Roemer to have arrived at a correct result.
With all its faults his work was admirable, taking into consideration the conditions
under which he worked, the data at his disposal and the limited knowledge of his time.
Everything is, however, subject to the effect of uninterrupted progress, and changes as
we move forward.
It would be folly to cling to theories, whether they be Roemer's or anyone else's,

thereby trying to impede the progress of time and ideas that move like a river in flood,
or to wish to put a limit to the understanding of phenomena like the cartographers of old
who used to write on their maps at the Pillars of Hercules: Hic deficit orbis (Here ends
the world). The theory of the speed of light is a modem equivalent to this attitude.
However, the adventurous seamen of old were not deterred by these injunctions of their
cartographers, who were the scientific elite of their times, and sailed onwards to
discover a new continent.
In the great and wonderful unknown now awaiting discovery, the Universe will be revealed
to you, no longer with limitations, but as infinitely great as its Creator. It is a
mansion of infinite size which serves as a residence for an infinite God Who, wishing to
show us the vastness of space, said: "The Heaven is my throne, and the Earth is my
footstool: where is the house that ye would build unto me?" (Isaiah 66: i).
And we in our foolishness wish to build him a house to suit our ideas that are no larger
than our small brains, as limited as relativity, and as cold and sepulchral as formulae.

We made a coffin of the Universe and placed within it a mummified God. We inverted the
process of creation and made a god of our image and likeness, circumscribed by the
boundaries of a Universe which was limited only by our reasoning.

The Aberration of Light, Chap. 8

Q: Up to now you have been dealing with matters that I can neither prove nor
disprove. I would never be able to find out whether what you say is true or false.
I would like you to talk about the aberration of light, by which Bradley calculated
the Earth's velocity in orbit. This is something which has been fully
substantiated, and your views on this would enable me to evaluate all that you have
told me so far. If Bradley was right, then you must be wrong, or vice versa.
A: I will try to give you an answer and analyse the problem; however, it will not
be easy for me to base my arguments on the data supplied by Earth's scientists,
owing to the difference between their methods and ours. You use kilometres or miles
as a measure of distance, whereas we take the galactic time as our yardstick. This
is hard to explain to people who are unaccustomed to seeing things from our point
of view. You go into complicated mathematical calculations to determine, let us
say, the diameter of the Earth's orbit, whereas we are not interested in the number
of kilometres this represents, but in its equivalent in galactic time.
However, let us forget galactic time for the moment, and assume that we are now
using an Earth year as the basis of our measurements. Taking an Earth year as
31,558,149 1/2 seconds, we can obtain the time equivalent of the diameter of the
Earth's orbit by dividing this figure by pi that is 10,045,247 seconds. Do you
follow?
(Q) YES
A: But this might confuse you and lead you to think that time is something to do
with relativity, as you already believe it to be. Time, for us, plays the part that
metres do for you. We look upon it as the result of the force that impels a body
through space. The greater the force the shorter the time, and the shorter also the
space to be traversed-or in your terminology, the distance. Thus, if the force were
infinitely great, time and space would be infinitely small; they would cease to
exist.
But again the force is not everything, because in reality it does not exist; all
that exists is the impulse that is applied to the' body in space and imparts
momentum to it. The body's movement is then only limited by the resistance it has
to overcome. What does exist then is the momentum that arises from the impulse of
the force, and not the force itself. Again this impulse only exists as a function
of a Will that gives rise to it. To sum up: time and space are the outcome of a
powerful Will acting on the Universe, that is what we measure, taking note of its
intensity in any given phenomenon. In our Universe this Will manifests itself as
galactic time. But let us get back to Bradley. He maintained that the aberration of
the light of stars was due to the time that light took to traverse space. On this
basis he calculated that the Earth's velocity in orbit should be:
Speed of light x Tan of Aberration.
But light in space is diffuse, and wherever the Earth may happen to be in its
orbit, the light of the stars will always be there ahead of it, in a sense waiting
for the Earth to reach it, there can therefore be no question of any delay in the
transmission of light through space. That theory is nothing more than an inept

sophism, unworthy of science.
We cannot fully analyse the problem in your terms without studying the Earth's
movements and correcting some of your data relating to its orbit.
You originally started by asking me scientific questions to find out where I came
from. Very well then, I am going to correct your estimates of the Earth's orbit by
a method which is still unknown to you on Earth. No inhabitant of Earth would be
able to do this as easily as I can. Later I could how you a dozen other ways of
doing it if you wished, without having recourse to any of your theories about light
and without using your parallax methods. Let us first correct your figures.
A day in the Earth's tropical year is 86,400 seconds long. This the time the Sun
takes to make two consecutive transits over a given point on the Earth's surface.
But if two consecutive transits of the Sun and a star are taken, we then find that
this sidereal day is only 86,164 seconds long, that is 236 seconds less than a
tropical day. The movement of the Earth in its orbit in one day causes the light of
the Sun to move forward over the Earth's surface in the direction of its rotation
by just that much. When the Earth at the end of a year has made a complete
revolution in orbit, this daily forward movement of the sunlight will have
accounted for a whole day, or in other words one complete revolution of the Earth
on its axis. This is to say that the time that should have appeared as one extra
day in the year has been accounted for by a daily increment of 236 seconds in the
length of each day.
The number of seconds in a sidereal year divided by the number in a sidereal day
will give us the number of revolutions the Earth makes on its axis in a year. With
31,558,1491 1/2 seconds in a sidereal year and 86,164 in a sidereal day, we get
366.2567 revolutions. From. this we can calculate the daily sidereal movement of
the Earth in its orbit in terms of degrees by dividing 360 degrees by the number of
revolutions. Viz:
360 degrees
______________ = 0.982917 degrees or 3.538 1/2 minutes
366.2567
If an observer outside the Earth were to observe eclipses of the Moon at say twenty
days' interval, he would notice that his predictions of the time of the second
eclipse would be out by 19.65834 degrees (i.e. 20 X 0.982917 degree). We can
convert this figure into terms of time by multiplying it by the number of seconds
in a sidereal day and dividing this sum by 36O. degree Viz
86,164 X 1965834
_________________ = 4,705 seconds.
360
The eclipse will therefore appear to take place 4,705 seconds later than predicted.
We can also arrive at the same result by another method:
(1) Convert the number of degrees into kilometres, taking the equatorial diameter

of the Earth as 12,756 km., and using the following formula:
2*PI*radius*19.65834
_____________________
360
This gives us 27,883 km. which is the distance on the Earth's
surface represented by an arc of 19.65834 degree.
(2) Obtain the speed of the Earth's axial rotation in metres per second by
multiplying the radius in kilometres by PI and dividing by the number of seconds in
a sidereal day. Viz:
PI*12,756 465,102 m. per second or
________ =
86,164 1,674367 km. per hour.
(3) Divide the 21,883 km. obtained in (1) above by the 465,702 m. per second
obtained in (2) above. This gives us 4,705 seconds once again as the result.
This then is the amount of the apparent retardation of the eclipse as seen by an
observer in space.
These then are the first corrections, the mean sidereal movement of the Earth and
is true speed of rotation. Without these data, we cannot calculate the Earth's
orbit with any accuracy.
Now there is a second point to consider. Your astronomy attributes the time of the
four seasons of the year to the movement of the Sun through the ecliptic. In fact,
the Sun has a movement of its own which cannot be seen from the Earth.
At the vernal equinox on March 21st, the Sun rises in the East and sets in the
West, between then and the summer solstice on June 2 1st, it appears to move
northwards.
After the solstice it then turns southwards again. At the autumnal equinox on
September 23rd, it again crosses the Equator and continues its southerly movement
until the winter solstice on December 22nd.
It then turns northwards again until it reaches the Equator again at the next
vernal equinox, having by then gained 1,223.898 seconds, or 20 minutes 23 seconds.
From this your astronomers concluded that the Sun has an annual movement of its own
on the ecliptic, its elevation varying with the ascending and descending nodes of
its movement.
Let us study the movement of the Earth with the aid of a diagram (a simplified
version of this is given in Fig. '9).

FIG. 19.
T1 shows the position of the Earth on June 21st, with the light of the Sun falling
directly on to the northern hemisphere at an angle of 23.444475 degree to the
Equator. As the Earth continues to move round its orbit in a horizontal plane (not
a vertical one as shown in the diagram for ease of illustration), the Sun will be
directly over the Equator on September 23rd (position T3). At position T3 on
December 22nd, the Sun will be overhead in the southern hemisphere and the northern
hemisphere will be cold.
It is thus obvious that the four seasons are not caused by either the Earth or the
Sun moving up or down in the plane of the ecliptic; both bodies remain in the same
plane. The change is due to the fact that the tilt of the Earth's axis is constant
and always points towards a hypothetical point in space. (This tilt is illustrated
by the angle of the brackets that support the globe in the diagram.)
The third point we must now study is the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit. We can
do this by noting the exact time of the four seasons of the year, using my method
of reckoning by time, which is more convenient and not open to errors.
The times elapsed between the four seasons are not all equal, viz:
(Times given below are for 1957-58, which we have substituted for earlier figures.)
Vernal Equinox (March 21st) to Summer Solstice (June 21st):
133.611 mutes.
Summer Solstice to Autumnal Equinox (September 23rd):
134.832 minutes.
Autumnal Equinox to Winter Solstice (December 22nd):
129.331 minutes.

Winter Solstice to Vernal Equinox: 128.195 minutes.
The 1,223 seconds gained between the two successive vernal equinoxes has not been
subtracted from these figures, the seasons being taken as sidereal time. We now
convert these four periods into four radii of time. This works out as follows:
133611 X 4
______________ = 85.059 minutes.
FIG. 20.
134832 X 4
(2) _______________ = 85.836 minutes.
129331 X 4
<3) ____________ = 82.334 minutes.
(4) 128195 X 4 = 81.611 minutes.
With the aid of these four sets of figures we can work out the orbit of the Earth
(see Fig. 20).

This, then, gives us the Earth's orbit. The period between March 21st and September
23rd is more or less regular, but after this latter date, the orbit looks as though
it has been pressed in towards the centre by some force. During this period the
Earth moves slowly in towards the Sun.
The fourth point to note is that the 1,223 seconds gained between the two vernal
equinoxes must have been accruing over the whole period of this uneven movement
through space, and not all at once. The reason for this precession is as follows:
The direction of the tilt of the Earth's axis, which is always in line with a
hypothetical point in space, changes very slowly all the time the Earth is
revolving in its orbit. The tilt of the axis remains constant at 23.444475 degrees,
but the direction in which the axis points changes by 50.2619" annually.
Q: But why does the direction of the tilt change?
A: Patience! We shall get to that in a minute.
This change in the direction of the axis causes the Earth to loose one sidereal day
every 70.401 years, or in other words 1,223.898 seconds every year. This figure is
obtained by multiplying the number of seconds in a sidereal year (31,558,I4 1/2) by
the amount of change in seconds (50.2619) and dividing this by the number of
seconds of arc in 360 degree (1,296,000). Furthermore, it can be calculated from
this that one sidereal year is lost every 25,784.93 years.
The change of 50.2619" in the direction of the tilt of the Earth's axis corresponds
to 1,223 seconds of time, and this is precisely the difference between the sidereal
and tropical years, viz:
Sidereal year = 31,558,149 seconds
Tropical year = 31,556,926 seconds
____________________
Difference 1,223 seconds.
With these data we can now ascertain the true orbit of the Earth by a different
method to yours.
At the time of the summer solstice the Sun climbs at zenith to 23 degrees 26' 494"
but at the time of the winter solstice it climbs to 23 degrees 26' 498" in the
southern hemisphere; a difference of 0.4'. This figure then is the difference in
the elevation of the Sun every time the direction of the tilt varies by 50.2619".
A difference of 04" in the Sun's position would amount to 0.8" at a point on the
opposite side of the Earth's orbit, since the Sun lies at the centre of the orbit.
From this we can see that the relationship between the variation in the axial
rotation and the orbital revolution of the Earth is:
50.2619"
_______________ or 62.82737: I.
0.8"

Do you now see why the Earth's revolution is 62.82737 times greater than its axial
rotation?
The Earth makes up for the precession that is brought about by the 50.2619"
variation in the direction of axial tilt in 1,223 seconds; that is the same amount
of time that its revolution in orbit takes to balance out the 0.4" variation in the
Sun's elevation, which in turn amounts to 0.8" across the whole diameter of the
orbit. So 50.2619 is the figure relative to axial rotation and 0.8 to orbital
revolution, which means there are over sixty-two periods of rotation for every one
of revolution. Do you follow?
Now we have previously obtained the true speed of the Earth's axial rotation
(465.102 m. per second) by dividing 2 PI*r by the number of seconds in a sidereal
day (86,164). Therefore if the Earth's velocity in orbit is 62.82737 times its
axial speed of rotation, its true velocity must be 29,221'135 m. per second. With
this we can now proceed to work out the exact length of the orbit, by multiplying
the speed by the number of seconds in a sidereal year. This gives us a figure of
922,164,946 km. Dividing this figure by PI we get the diameter of the orbit, i.e.
293,534,466 km.; its radius is therefore 146,766,760 km.
Q: The figures arrived at by this method are not the same as those obtained by our
methods.
A: That is true, but your calculations are based on a number of doubtful factors.
One of the methods you use is to measure the diameter of the Sun at aphelion and
again at perihelion;but at both these times the Sun is at a slight angle, so that
its light has to traverse a greater amount of atmosphere. The resultant refraction
introduces an element of error into the calculation, but in the method we use there
is no room for error.
To go back to the diagram giving the times of the seasons (Fig. 20), we can now
convert these minutes into kilometres by multiplying them with the Earth's velocity
in orbit (29,221.135 m. per second). We shall then see that the Earth's closest
distance to the Sun is 143,086,633 km. and its farthest 150,494,225 km.
Well, then, with the Earth's true velocity in orbit, we should be able to work out
the speed of light, viz:
29,221135 km.
______________ = 294,443.229 km. per second.
O.O0O099242
Alternatively we could work it out from the length of the Earth's orbit:
The aberration of light is 2O.47" annually, which converted into distance on the
Earth's orbit is:
922,164,946km. X 20.47"
____________ = 14,565.351 km.
1,296,0OO"

In relation to a point on the opposite side of the orbit, this figure would be
doubled, i.e. 29,13O.7O2 km. With a velocity in orbit of 29.221135 km. per second,
the Earth will cover these 2O.47 in 9969 seconds, viz:
29,130702 km.
______________ = 996.9 seconds
29.221135 km./second
Or in other words the time taken for light to traverse the diameter of the Earth's
orbit is:
Diameter of orbit 294,443 .229 km./second
_________________ or
Speed of light 293,534,446 km.
All this would be very interesting if it were true. I just did it to show you
that I know enough about the subject to correct your figures. The fact that we were
apparently able to deduce the speed of light from the data that gave us the
velocity in orbit is purely coincidental.
Q: Well, then, if Bradley's system is incorrect, why is it that one, can observe an
aberration in the light of the stars?
A: That is simple my friend. Whenever one travels in a vehicle of any kind, one
gets the impression that all things exterior to the vehicle are in motion, whereas
the vehicle itself appears to be stationary. The apparent speed of the stars'
movement depends on the distance we are from them, or the angle at which we see
them. Distant objects appear to move at a slower pace, until at infinity they would
appear to us to be stationary. Light does not contribute anything to this
phenomenon, any aberration there may be lies, in consequence, in our senses and not
in light itself: As the Earth approaches or recedes from the Sun, following a more
or less elliptical course, the stars will appear to follow this movement on a
smaller scale. The 20.47" of aberration corresponds to the diameter of the Earth's
orbit.
It must not be forgotten that all stars show the same amount of aberration, in
spite of the fact that some are more distant than others. If there were no
relationship between distance and the aberration, then the light from the Sun
should show the same degree of aberration, but it does not. You might contend that
the Sun is very close to us, but if we accept this then light from a greater
distance taking more time to reach us should show a greater aberration, but this
does not happen either. But in any case, even at that short distance, there should
be a time difference of
996.9
______ seconds, ie 498 seconds
every time the Earth moves through 180 degrees of its orbit

The Planets should also show a similar aberration, If this were the case all their
movements would appear to us to be advanced or retarded, and as we drew closer to a
planet there would be an apparent increase in its speed of rotation, or
alternatively a decrease as we moved away; we would then get ourselves into the
absurd position of seeing events happening before they actually took place.
Bradley's mistake was that he assumed light to have a speed of 300,000 km. per
second in accordance with Roemer's theory. As this figure works out at about one-
thousandth part of the diameter of the Earth's orbit, he jumped to the wrong
conclusion, on seeing the two figures tally, and based his theory on that.
I do not wish to imply that light moves instantaneously, but only that sight is
independent of light. If one sees a star rising in the sky, we perceive it before
its light reaches us.
Q: At least I find your various methods of calculating the Earth's orbit

convincing. I would, however, be obliged if you would explain why the Earth reaches
the point of Aries 1,223 seconds before the completion of a sidereal year, and why
the direction of its axial inclination changes by 50.2619" annually. There must be
some reason for it.
A. There certainly is a reason. But strictly speaking there is no such thing as a

precession of 1,223 seconds. It is an effect that can be explained when one knows
more about it. I will explain.
The Earth, in common with the whole of the solar system, takes a spiral course
through space. This is a retrograde spiral movement, with the Sun at its centre. I
will illustrate this with the aid of a diagram (Fig. 21).
Note the inversion of the movements, the Earth revolving in one direction makes a
spiral in the opposite direction.
Now this whole retrograde spiral itself moves in a circle through space, and at the
end of every year it cuts across the circumference of this circle slightly earlier
than in the preceding year, to be exact 1,223 seconds prior to the completion of
the sidereal year.
As the Equator of the Earth lies at an angle of 23 degrees to the Sun, the
retrograde movement of the Earth will cause the light of the Sun to reach the
Equator 1,223 seconds before the Earth itself crosses this circumference. The
annual rate of precession is 50.2619" on this spiral, means it takes the Earth
25,784.93 years to complete a whole cycle.

The imaginary line that the spiral movement describes in space lies at right angles
to the inclination. Since it contains the greater land mass, the North
Pole is thrown slightly off balance by the resultant centrifugal force and moves to
the outside of the spiral track, whereas the South Pole, with the lesser land mass,
moves to the inside of the track.
So the annual precession is not strictly speaking a displacement, but rather the
direction the spiral follows, or a tendency of the poles to move under the
unbalanced action of the differing centrifugal force at the two poles. This
tendency throws one pole to the outside of the spiral track and pulls the other to
the inside of it, this in turn causes the Equator to alter its position in relation
to the Sun, without any alteration in the angle of the axial inclination itself.
Q:This means that there is no actual annual variation in the axial inclination?
A: At the moment there is not, but it could happen, and that would be a
catastrophe, the like of which you have never witnessed in modern times.
It has happened in the course of the Earth's history, and many lands vanished to
the bottom of the oceans. I will tell you how this could happen again. The North
Pole, like the South Pole, is covered with ice. All the atomic tests are carried
out in the northern hemisphere, so that; all the radioactive elements, known as
atomic dust, settle on the North Pole rather than the South.
It is well known that radio activity repels magnetism, so that the atomic fall-out
at the North Pole will cause a rise in temperature owing to the influence of the
magnetic field there, and this in turn will cause the ice-cap to melt, thus
bringing about a reduction in the mass at the North Pole.
The water from the melting ice-cap will distribute itself throughout the oceans.
This reduction in the mass at one pole will affect the amount of centrifugal force
developed, thus altering the inclination of the Earth's axis.
When this happens land will emerge from the Pacific Ocean, and from the North and
South Atlantic. The emergence of these new land masses will change the level of the
oceans, causing flooding in the low-lying countries. The present course of ocean
currents will also be changed, giving rise to very different conditions to those
now prevailing.

Q: Why will these new lands emerge.
A:I have already told you that a planet is a delicate organism. One change brings a
number of others in its wake; even the biological conditions of life can be
affected. The change in the mass at the North Pole will cause a reduction in the
angle of inclination of the Earth's axis. It is the Earth's rotation that creates
the centrifugal force that forms the continents. The present angle of 23 degree is
responsible for the existence of the land masses in the northern hemisphere; if the
angle of inclination is altered, then land masses will appear in other places,
until the proper balance is restored. Some continents will re-appear the north of
Russia, Greenland and the north of Canada will disappear.
The mean level of the continents will be slightly lower, but there will be no
general cataclysm.
Q: This would only come about very gradually, would it not?
A: The process would be slow until the North Pole reaches a high enough temperature
to cause a widespread thaw, then it could happen in a night. I believe it could
happen sometime between 1968 and 1972. It will be brought home to you by a
tremendous earthquake that will shake the Earth to its foundations. Cities will
fall in ruins and great cracks will appear in the surface of the Earth. The effects
will be catastrophic. The only advice I can give you, is that you should at least
try to balance off the radioactivity at the poles, so that there is an equal thaw
at both the South and the North Poles; this will prevent any undue unbalance in the
mass and the Earth's spiral movement will remain unaffected. If you notice that the
oceans of the northern hemisphere are getting warmer than usual, or that the ocean
currents are beginning to change their course, then stop letting off bombs in the
northern hemisphere be reasonable at least!
But let us get back to our subject. I showed you how the Earth, rotating
anticlockwise, describes a retrograde spiral movement in space.
This is another illustration of the polarity that is to be found everywhere in the

Universe. A movement in one direction gives rise to another in the opposite.
A positive is cancelled out by a negative. The Earth loses a year every time it
completes a cycle of this spiral, or in other words it loses one day in every
seventy years. When the cycle of the spiral movement is completed every 25,784
years, a complete calendar year is lost, just as a day is lost every time the Earth
completes a revolution in orbit which you reckon as 365 days long instead of 366.
This great spiral that the Earth describes is not only responsible for the 1,223
seconds difference between the tropical and sidereal years, but it also affects
every other body in the system, including the Sun. Even the Sun, which is looked
upon as the centre of the system, itself revolves around a magnetic centre, and
this centre also has a spiral movement of its own which corresponds to the movement
of the planets.
Now pay careful attention to this: The Earth moves counterclockwise, the spiral is
clockwise; this latter is in turn the result of the movement of the galaxy, which
moves in the same direction as the Earth. Thus we get three different movements
within the galaxy, two in one direction and one in another. The movement of the
galaxy in its turn affects the movement of bodies, but as the time involved is very
great, it is almost imperceptible to you. We take our measurement of time from this

movement of our galaxy in relation to the movement of other galaxies. However, we

feel we are somewhat behind hand in this matter, and we have come to the
conclusion, after some study, that it should be possible to change this system to
Universal time which would be more exact.
Q: I do not quite understand, you were talking about galactic time, which implies
time based on the movement of galaxies-is this not Universal time?
A: No. The galaxies are not the Universe, in the strict sense of the word. They, in
common with the planets, have their own movements of rotation and revolution in
space and in Universal time. Millions of galaxies put together would only make a
tiny island in the Universe, for lack of a better word we could call these "island
universes," and these are only part of the Universe as a whole. I would like to'
define at this point the term "Flight of Nebulae." The nebulae that make up an
"island universe" do not move away from one another, it is the "island universes"
themselves that move away from one another. What you regard as the flight of
nebulae is nothing more than an optical illusion, the real movement that takes
place between the "island universes" themselves could never be measured on your
instruments. Let us imagine four nebulae in the form of spheres, all moving in a
common orbit, in an anti-clockwise direction. From a distance they would appear to
be moving away from one another
(Fig.22).
One can see that the nebulae N1 and N3, even though they are moving in the same
direction, will appear to an outside observer to be going in opposite directions.
Nebula N3 will also appear to be flying away, whereas Nebula N4 will appear to be
getting closer. Spectrographic observation of the nebulae would also give the same
result.
As the orbits of nebulae in space are too vast and the time they take to complete a
revolution in their orbit too long for measurement by ordinary optical instruments,
it has not been possible to plot their actual orbits in space.
This is the explanation of the optical illusion that Earth's physicists have
observed. The apparent speed of the nebulae depends on the positions they occupy in
their respective orbits at the time as well as on the observer's angle of sight.
Similarly, if an observer a long way outside our solar system were to observe a
conjunction of the Earth and Jupiter, he would be under the impression that they
were flying away from one another, and the Earth would appear to be moving the
faster of the two.

However, there is an actual flight of the small island universes, due to the
pressure of their radiation, and the type of electric charge they carry. They all
end up in the same place in the end in the graveyard of the Infinite.
As soon as they come into being, they move away from one another, and only meet
again at the end of their life cycle. They behave like a herd of elephants, making
for the place where they know they have to die. They are all born in the same
cradle, and then their radiation and electric charge came them to separate out and
to gather momentum, each one following its own divergent path to the limits of
space. After countless ages they eventually reach the end of their journey, coming
together again at the opposite pole of the Universe, old, exhausted, there to meet
their brothers: they still try to repel each other, and to get away from each
other, but they no longer have the strength to do so. In their dying hour Nature
forces them into a final embrace, and they pass away like minor gods in an ocean of
blazing light.
But I cannot tell you everything about this life cycle. There are things in the
Universe that I would not dare to probe. Some things are so subtle that man will
only be able to understand them when a higher Power endows him with a brain that
can cope with such vast concepts without blacking out. I know that the Universal
Life has an enchantment beyond words; as though it were some mysterious song, sung
by some immortal Being, whose voice brings worlds into being, then destroys them to
re-create them. At the command "Talima Cumi" the universes stream forth again.
We know of the existence of a number of" island universes," all forming part of a
common system, yet there must be countless other universes that we knew nothing of.
We shall never know their full number, because life is infinite. Our Universe,
which I mistakenly designated as "the Universe as a whole," due to a limitation of
my mind, is itself only an island within the Infinite, perhaps little more than one
of the grains of sand that desert winds carry to far off places; we do not know
where the winds come from, nor whither they are going. As yet I know nothing, and
many of the things that I have told you may be wrong. To an amoeba, a drop of water
must appear infinite, and it could not even conceive of the Earth that sustained
it. In a sense the amoeba would be right, as the drop of water marks the limit of
its consciousness, but not the limit of life.
In relation to the Infinite, what more are we and our little world than the amoeba
in its drop of water.
It is getting late for you, and it is time we took leave of one another.
Q: I have only one more question for today: if the axial tilt of the Earth is
reduced, which places will suffer most as a result?
A: The continent in the Northern hemisphere with the greatest land mass, to be more
explicit, Russia. The unbalance of the mass will cause a new continent to rise out
of the Pacific Ocean, and the north of Russia will sink. Most of the steppes will
vanish for ever, the northern sea will join up with the Caspian, and the remainder
of her territory will be rocked by terrible earthquakes. It will not be Russia
alone that suffers. Low-lying countries will be totally flooded. There will be a
general fall in the level of all the land in the northern hemisphere, and a general
raising in the southern hemisphere.
Q: Could the tilt of the Earth's axis disappear altogether?
A: No, if this happened life would be completely extinguished. If the centrifugal

force were evenly distributed over all points of the globe, the bed of the sea
would be on the same level as the continents, and all the existing land masses

would vanish below the waters. In the beginning the axis of the Earth was at right
angles to its plane of rotation, and then the waters covered the planet. In order
that life should flourish on Earth, the Creator caused the axis to tilt, so that
the ensuing centrifugal force raised the continents from out of the waters. At that
time there was a high degree of radioactivity around the planet, and this
radioactivity, reacting against the magnetic field of the Earth at the poles,
caused them to heat up. Then, as the radioactivity decreased, the poles cooled off
again, and the Earth tilted on its axis. Then later there was another sudden change
in the inclination, and some of the land that had risen out of the waters
disappeared once more under the waves, and other land appeared elsewhere. Many
species of fauna vanished when the radioactivity ceased, and they may well reappear
and populate the Earth with their kind once again. Now that you have decided to
make the Earth radioactive, you will quite shortly see that the so-called
antediluvian species will appear in various parts of the world, for no apparent
reason.
These may be marine animals or even mammals. The reason for this is that the
movement of the Earth in space determines the biological life of the planet, and
this movement can be upset if man inadvertently puts his finger in the gears.
Radioactive dust has the same effect on the planet as a grain of sand that some
cheeky child puts into his father's watch.

Message Page 1 of 5
MAN'S WASTED EFFORTS, Chap. 9

Q: Can you please tell us what you think of us, and give us some idea of our weak points. In a game of cards it is easier
for an onlooker to see what should be played than it is for the players. Your views would obviously be unbiased. In
what direction should we progress to achieve happiness?
A: You want to be happy, and think that material progress is the magic word which makes water spring from a rock.
Neither worldly possessions nor knowledge can ensure a man s happiness. Knowledge is not an attribute of animals
and yet they are happy as God made them. The savage in his habitat lives peacefully in spite of his poverty and
ignorance. He would probably not exchange his discomforts and lack of knowledge for all the erudition of the scientist
taking part in scientific discussions.
True human happiness must rest on the understanding that it is God's will that man's destiny should be a glorious
one, in obedience with the laws of the Creator and in love for his fellows. Of what avail are all his possessions and all
his knowledge, his dominion over the forces of Nature, if he has no dominion over his own heart?
Many scientists placed themselves above the world, and in their arrogance felt superior to other men. But they died,
and their theories were subsequently disproved. They are remembered as individuals who thought they knew
everything, but were deceived and did not even know themselves.
Others became famous though the possession of worldly goods, but death destroyed their dominion and at the last
moment they felt unhappier than anyone when they saw that they had lived in illusion. Nobody dies happily with
science and money alone.
However, those who showed their wisdom through love still live in men's hearts.
They died happily having lived happily. Mary of Nazareth, Florence Nightingale, John the Baptist, still live on as true
individuals, the light of their love illuminating the lives of many. Without doubt St. Francis of Assisi lived at so high a
level that the scientists who designed the atomic bomb could not even hope to touch the soles of his feet. And yet he
was not a learned man.
There are men of great riches on Earth, yet they could not prevent their sons becoming thieves or murderers. Did
riches bring happiness in such cases? A rich man may send his son to university to return a few years later with his
diplomas, but can a diploma make a person good? Cannot lawyers also be thieves, and doctors murderers, and priests
immoral?
I maintain that a hungry father with a virtuous son would be happier than a rich father with a thieving or murderous
son.
Q: I realise that righteousness is superior to everything, but I would like to know, from our material point of view,
excluding any ethical considerations, what the principal mistakes in our methods are, and how they might adversely
affect our future.
A: Nobody can divorce progress from its moral aspect. But since you wish to know of the effects, and not the cause, I
will outline them to you:
Humanity's great failing is never being able to walk without its eyes glued to the road it has already covered; it has
thus become a pillar of salt like Lot's wife. Man is basically conservative and prefers to live in the memory of times
that can never return rather than in the hope of a radiant future.
He fears the day to come instead of helping the future and preparing its way. He expends an enormous amount of
energy on things that cannot help him, and wastes precious time on futile things; for instance, he wastes money,

Message Page 2 of 5
teachers' and pupils' time, maintains buildings, uses up brainpower, all to teach dead languages which should have
been buried long ago.
Paper, ink, books, chalk and a thousand other things that could be put to a better use are used in teaching useless
things. Instead of a dead language, why not teach the functioning of photosynthesis. It would be more worth while to
know the meaning of potential gradient, or the functions of the body, rather than the declension of an ancient
language. Rather than look into a most promising future, they prefer to live among the mummies of history, and try to
resuscitate the past.
There is a multitude of things which children never hear about, and which they may never come to hear about. Rather
than teaching recitation, it would be better to show them how to grow onions and celery, or teach them that wheat,
besides providing good food, can also be used for making vegetable oil, viscose, xylose, acetic acid, soap, alcohol,
cellulose, syrup, textiles, fuel, etc., and that the stalks and leaves from which all these things are made should never be
buried because they are unsuitable as fertiliser and are carriers of crop diseases.
Teach them rather the meaning of the hydrogenous potential of the soil, how to correct acidity, what soil requires in
the way of nitrogen, caesium, cobalt, sulphur, manganese and phosphorus. Show them that vegetable hormones can
produce cabbage leaves ten feet high, and apples weighing several pounds.
Children can forget the names of those who brought devastation to humanity, but they should never forget that it is
possible to transform the light of the Sun, virtually without loss, into usable energy by passing it though a coal gas
which unites with water to form formaldehyde; and that the oxidised aldehyde can turn sunlight into electric current.
There is far greater beauty to be found in the saturation point of a solution than there is in the story of the destruction
of Carthage.
Millions of individuals die of cancer, whereas schools teach children the colours of national flags, offending the innate
gregarious instinct of man which intuitively abhors the artificial barriers which economic power has erected in the
world.
Rather than dwell upon the word "China," they should learn more about caesium; instead of France, Brazil, U.S.A.,
U.S.S.R. they should learn more about the functions of nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur and iron, teaching them that
these elements, among others, produce proteins, and that they, in turn, linked to caesium molecules, make up the anti-
cancerous elements normally contained in the liver. Tell them that these same proteins, when linked to cobalt
molecules, combat anaemia and are known as vitamin B.12.
Instead of sounding praises to the destructive power of an invader show them that heavy hydrogen is one of the main
causes of cancer when it gets into a cell, and that caesium has the ability to strip it of an electron making it into
ordinary innocuous hydrogen. Show them, statistically, that cancer generally affects children who have not yet
reached fertility, or old people who have passed it, that sex is thus a defence mechanism of the body, and that these
hormones should not be wasted for the mere satisfaction of instincts.
Teach them that instead of drinks it would be preferable to take an extract of liver with enzymes, since these elements
cause cancer to recede.
It surprises me that humanity, not having discovered a cure for tuberculosis, should learn rhetoric and dissertation at
school. These things should be pastimes for people who do not have diseases to worry about that bring misery to
millions of people. It is as though 'someone in mortal agony should begin to study the metre of Alexandrine verses..
But all the above put together are not as serious as humanity's main fault: the dispersal of his forces to an alarming
degree. I cannot quote the exact statistics for the world, or even for your country, but we can make an approximation.
There are about 50 million people in Brazil. About 30 million of these are children too young to take part in the
productive life of the country, another 10 million are women, which leaves 10 million men.
In the latter figure one must include the retired and the unproductive, beggars, lepers, consumptives, lunatics,
invalids, the blind, thieves, prisoners and the unemployed.

Message Page 3 of 5
A large proportion of work is in unproductive, speculative undertakings, such as wholesalers, retailers, advertising
men, estate agents, stockbrokers, lawyers, bankers. Others are employed in the police, army, navy, air force,
magistrature, diplomatic and civil service, etc.
This leaves barely a million productive men employed in agriculture and industry. We would also have to be sure that
this agriculture is productive in the true sense of the word, and that the industries are the ones that the country really
needs.
In any case, even supposing that all the men were productive, we would still only have 2 million out of a total of 50
million, that is to say, one man working for every twenty-five people, which is absurd when we consider that this
individual who does the work for the other twenty-five generally does so without mechanical aids, by the sweat of his
brow, so that the others can maintain their standard of living.
Of the million or so who take part in agriculture, many work against the better interests of society, growing tobacco
and stimulants, or are engaged in the fattening up of animals which impoverish the land and subsequently poison man
with their meat.
We could say almost the same for those employed in industry. There is nothing wrong with factories, their chimneys
are, in a sense, lungs getting rid of carbon dioxide from the central organism.
But man does little to put them to proper use. Factories are by no means always built to solve fundamental problems.
The great majority are engaged in making cosmetics, jewels, useless trinkets for women, endless handbags, ridiculous
hats, novelties, nail varnish, shoes which hurt the feet and ruin the carriage, stockings which offer no protection,
cigars to poison the body, chewing gum, footballs, pistols and sporting guns, munitions, alcoholic drinks and other
stimulants; yet there are countless useful and necessary things which could be mass produced, such as building
material, medicaments, synthetic vegetable hormones, machines for producing energy, electronic stoves, concentrated
foodstuffs for distressed populations, philosophical and scientific books, plastic shoes, surgical and orthopaedic
instruments, fertilisers, mechanical harvesters and sowers, insecticides, prefabricated houses, indestructible furniture,
prospecting instruments, nitrogen plant, etc.
But let us leave aside all this wasted effort and see how you make use of the work of these 2 million men who are at
least doing something. The annual budget estimates for your country must be somewhere about 6.5 billion cruzeiros.
Of this sum, about 4.25 billion are spent on the armed forces, and about 1.25 billion on civil service, the judiciary,
state loans, government expenditure, foreign ministry, electoral machinery, official journeys, banquets, etc.
The small remainder is used for beneficial purposes, such as education, public health and agriculture.
Imagine if all this money were ploughed into the construction of roads, schools, hospitals, churches, research
institutes, sanitation, new industries, housing schemes, shelter, medicaments, transportation, etc. Imagine if this vast
number of non-productive people were to be diverted into new productive enterprises.
Even then everything is not covered by the federal budget. What about State expenditure? Have you checked the
amount of money spent on local governments, public service, police, etc? How many police are there in your State
alone?
The expenditure on horses alone which are kept for parades would go a long way to feeding and sheltering the hungry
who walk the streets in the heat and in the rain. It is ironical that in a society in which its people can suffer from
hunger and cold, horses should be given balanced rations and covered with good woollen blankets.
Is a police force necessary? Yes, it is necessary. It is the necessity of having a policed state that Rousseau spoke of. But
if it is necessary, it is only because men have made it indispensable. If a people waste their productivity on bad things,
misery results from their irresponsibility. If there were an abundance, no one would think of killing or robbing.
Human passions are stirred up by money because money gives rise to arguments, to profit, the voracity of financiers,
and to ruthlessness. If there is a robbery, it is not, with certain exceptions, because the thief enjoys the crime, but
because he feels robbed
by society which denied him the right to have his own house,to till the land without paying rent, and to fully enjoy the
liberty which Nature gives instinctingly.

Message Page 4 of 5
The waste of fuel under the present system is alarming. Cars, which could carry several people, are usually driven by
one person who, in the majority of cases, is merely amusing himself, whereas the person who is working has no means
of transport. The avid desire for profit and business create a demand for petrol, oil, tyres, etc. If the structure of
society were changed, the traffic that now blocks the roads in the rush hour would disappear, leading to economy in
both fuel and vehicles.
Man could work less than a year in his whole life, and yet live better than the richest man on Earth. But for human
society, even progress is dangerous. If automation is developed, men will die of hunger owing to unemployment. Yet
even the manual labour that men do today could be done by obedient and indefatigable electronic brains.
These "robots" could plough, sow, spread insecticide and fertilisers, prune and reap. If they sensed an ailing plant,
they would be able to judge whether it should be treated or whether it constituted a danger for other plants and
should be uprooted. These "robots' could be developed to a point where they would be able to drive vehicles
automatically without danger of collision or accident, they could pilot planes with safety, informing base about any
possible defects, and taking steps to repair them in full flight.
They could be used to measure metabolism and act as doctors supplying restorative energy.
For less than the amount of money that is spent. on smoking every year, you could do away with cancer; for a tenth of
the money spent on drinks you can banish leprosy from the face of the Earth, and tuberculosis would no longer be a
subject for statistics.
Control of the atmosphere could regulate the climate avoiding natural catastrophes, and saving crops.
Electric cells could be placed in streets to absorb all irritating noises.
Education could be changed. Naturally, any radical change would involve the dismissal of teachers which in the
present world situation would mean that they would suffer serious privation.
Today most people spend the best part of their lives, from the age of seven until about thirty, poring over books, and
at the end of this, they are chagrined to find that they have learned nothing, and still have a long way to go. A lifetime
is too short to learn everything.
However, using hypnosis in a truly scientific spirit, the whole scope of education could be changed. In a few hours a
child could master a whole subject which at present takes the better part of its youth to master.
Further, he would do so with great accuracy. It would be sufficient to put a child into a controlled hypnotic sleep, with
the help of a drug such as canabissativa, or a combination of chloroform and morphia, administered at intervals with
a psychologist at hand to dictate all the material to be learned.
This could be carried out on a large scale with thousands of pupils at once, making use of headphones. It would be
easier, more convenient, and cheaper, and it would not bore a child with long lectures, it would not be subject to the
shortcomings of the teachers, and other disadvantages of the present system.
Pupils could go to college early, sleep and come back with a scientific degree in their pockets. Do you think this is too
short a time to learn so much? Surely a teacher would not be able to dictate enough in that time. The spirit pays no
heed to the concepts of time and space, an eternity can be condensed into a second, or a second can be made into an
eternity. One could create the system of rapid transmission. Human thought waves work on a band of about 5mm
wavelength. If electrical messages were sent within this band in successive waves, the whole of human knowledge
could be transmitted in a very short time.
The same method could be used to do away with atavistic tendencies and criminal tendencies. In hypnotic sleep the
mind becomes receptive and ready to learn and profit by sound teaching. One could go further and break down the
barrier between the conscious and the subconscious. However, this would require considerable technique which could
only be mastered in time, as there is a risk of the concept of time disappearing from the mind altogether.
Prisons could be emptied, in the first place by deleting criminal tendencies from the human mind so that no further

Message Page 5 of 5
malefactors would come into being, and in the second because those with criminal tendencies already would be re-
educated. by the hypnotic process and reintegrated into society.
With its framework changed, society would overcome the moral prejudices which dog its steps. Man would overcome
death and old age would no longer exist on Earth.
Q: How do we overcome death?
A: In order to overcome death, one needs to know the fundamentals of life. It is the spirit which gives life to the body,
and is bound magnetically to the body.
The current flowing through a solenoid gives rise to a magnetic field which draws the iron core into the coil. Any field
must have a centre to act as a vehide for the lines of force which it generates. Once it has attracted the iron, the
solenoid can be turned in any direction without the core falling out.
No visible bond is holding it, only lines of force, several thousand to the square inch, which are not visible to the naked
eye. The relationship between spirit and the body is similar to that between the solenoid and the iron core. The body
corresponds to the solenoid and its current can be measured with an encephalograph; the spirit represents the iron
core.
If the magnetic field made by the body is interrupted, or its lines of force broken, or if the electric current which feeds
it stops flowing, then the spirit is freed. This is death.
However, if the lesion which gave rise to the interruption could be cured by suitable apparatus, the field would be
restored, and the spirit, if we called it back, would return and unite with matter, falling again into the restored
magnetic field.
For this, one would use human or vegetable ectoplasm which would cure the injured part.
Death is therefore a defect which can be overcome. I do not mean to say that man could live eternally, but he could get
as far as making Methuselah envious.
He did not live longer because the Flood swallowed him up, but if mankind were good, the forces of Nature, instead of
destroying man would continue to preserve his life.
I have told you what I think from the material point of view, but I could tell you much more from the spiritual point
of view, exploring avenues which science, up to the present, has not even dreamed of. You showed a preference for the
material point of view. You got what you asked for.

Message Page 1 of 7
The Atomic Danger, Chap. 10

Q: Please tell me why you think our use of atomic energy is dangerous?
A: I do not say that the use of atomic energy is a danger to humanity. What I do
say is that aggressive hatred coupled with atomic energy will destroy the earth.
There are two sides to every picture. It depends which you choose.
Electrical energy is useful to man, as it turns motors, runs factories, produces

abundant light, and in fact supplies, all the requirements of modem life. Yet it is
also used m electric chairs to take another's life.
Dynamite can also be put to peaceful uses, breaking up rocks, mining, making
canals, etc.; but it is also used in weapons of war.
Aviation represents a step forward on the road to peace, and the brotherhood of
man, yet it is used to rain destruction on cities, bringing death to many homes,
orphaning thousands of innocent children who know nothing of the commercial
interests of the potentates of Earth.
In the story of Croesus, all that he touched was turned to gold; mankind is a
Croesus in reverse. If he touches the pure gold which God offers him, he turns it
to filth that pollutes the world.
Atomic energy is a gift of God, when used sparingly and for peaceful ends. Its
wanton use and its application to war could mean the complete and utter extinction
of the life as we know it today on this planet.
The last chapter of atomic energy has not yet been written neither on Earth nor in
any other part of the Universe.
It cannot, in fact, be written by anyone because it has no end. You are, then,
still beginners in this vast subject.
Soon you will use hydrogen, nuclear fusion, and then gamma rays, as means of
destruction. If you do not destroy the globe with hydrogen bombs, you will do so by
other more powerful means. One day the end will come. If nothing else, when you
discover the magnetic effects of the planets, you will destroy everything.
Put a monkey in a laboratory and see what happens.
The people of Earth have two roads ahead: life or death. May they make a wise
choice!
Q: Do you mean to say that atomic energy is good, except when used for warlike
purposes? In that case, its effect can only be harmful from the moral point of
view, but not inherently harmful.
A: I meant both. The moral aspect is obvious, but I implied the material aspect
too.

Message Page 2 of 7
Q: What is its effect upon the material order of things?
A: In a short time you will have hydrogen bombs of devastating power. Remember I
told you that in the upper regions of the atmosphere physiochemical reactions take
place which prevent the penetration of rays from the Sun.
These layers not only filter radioactivity, but also maintain the Earth in space.
One must often admire man's acts of generosity, when he becomes good and is endowed
with intelligence.
At other times he shows himself to be a fool. If a slight increase in solar

activity disturbs life on Earth, changing human beings, Hertzian waves, climate,
etc., how much more harm can be done by an increase in radioactivity directly
injected into the heart of Earth by hydrogen bombs?
Solar disturbances are periodic and their effects soon disappear because they are
the result of waves; but radioactivity produced by hydrogen bombs has a lasting
effect, because atomic dust remains in suspension and takes time to fall. While in
suspension it damages the higher layers; when it falls it poisons everything.
A planet is a delicate organism, whose natural equilibrium cannot be upset with

impunity. This excess radioactivity begins by influencing men's brains, upsetting
them noticeably. Soon you will see madness range over the Earth.
The use of hydrogen bombs will unleash the horsemen of the Apocalypse, who were
designated for that day and hour. Elements now unknown will appear and poison the
vegetation and, consequently, men and animals.
The seas will be poisoned and the fish will die. Water will be contaminated at its
source, because it will fall from radioactive clouds. Showers of particles will
fall to Earth and the crops will perish.
Moreover, the atmospheric layers will be changed. Upon their composition depends
the stability of the planet. They will then cease to produce light and affect the
luminosity of the Sun. They will no longer be able to filter the solar emanations
and the Sun will turn black and you will experience indescribable sensations.
There will be Dantesque scenes. It will be then that Earth's people discover how
wrong was the theory based on the fixed speed of light at 186,ooo miles per second.
Earth will be subject to energy in the form of ultraviolet waves, with speeds of
millions of miles per second.
Meanwhile, in spite of this intense solar energy, there will be no light, but only
a rusty red glow near the ground. Man will suffer from terrible cold, but his flesh
will be burned as with a hot iron by actinic radiation. If man looks at the Sun,
his eyes will be destroyed.
The upper layers of the atmosphere produce or prevent earthquakes. A major

alteration of these would make the whole Earth tremble and its cities will collapse
like a pack of cards; a quaking earth below, and darkness and burning heat above.
Enormous waves will form on the seas, compressed violently by the solar energy. The
poles will be subject to greater solar pressure and will melt, raising the level of
the seas so that people in maritime cities would be struck with terror.

Message Page 3 of 7
The roaring of the waters will play a fearful duet with the groaning of the earth.
The present rate of atomic explosions has already caused the mean heat of the Earth
to increase, and it will continue to do so at the rate of 0.3 degree C. each year.
If there were to be a hydrogen war, there would be pandemonium.
Radioactivity in the upper layers is already enough to melt the polar caps and
flood low-lying cities.
In twenty years there will be a difference of 6C. Before then, all the ice of the
poles will have melted.
Strange diseases will appear. The liver is a living laboratory and on being
attacked by the ingestion of radioactive elements scattered about the world, it
will lose its ability to produce the elements for bodily defences.
Leukaemia will destroy children who have not reached puberty, as well as old people
whose sex force is spent. Cancer will spread rapidly. Ghastly pestilence will
attack the skin and the eyes and there would be no cure.
Nursing mothers will weep with sorrow, knowing that their milk, which should
nourish the child, carries lethal poisons which will destroy its bones and bring
leukaemia. Many, unable to withstand such suffering, will seek death, cursing life
and those who launched such despair upon the world.
Then humanity will see whither progress without God has brought them maniacs in the
streets, the maimed everywhere, hospitals overflowing, cemeteries full, larders
empty, millions destroyed by war, orphaned children, ravaged cities, contaminated
fields, poisoned waters, terrorised multitudes, plague, terror, blasphemy, grief,
desolation. On Earth, people in anguish; in the heavens the cosmic laws upset.
Will you not understand that only spiritual progress linked to God can be of any
value, and lead mankind on the road to peace? Will you not yet see that only love
can uplift man to reach eternity?
But this is not all. While atomic potential is being prepared in your. arsenals to
destroy Earth at one blow, guided missiles will be improved.
The day will come when armies will lose their raison d'dtre, navies will be
useless, and even the most advanced air force will be obsolete.
Men will destroy themselves by pressing buttons. Then the great danger will
threaten. In a moment, like a flash of lightning, a cloud of flame could annihilate
all life of Earth.
For a rocket, to get from one continent to another, needs to climb to heights where
only pure hydrogen exists. There would be a hydrogen bomb in the nose of this
rocket. Now, in the upper layers of the atmosphere, atomic reactions are subject to
different laws. Magnetic fields are weaker and the bomb more easily triggered off.
The critical mass and the critical distance are not the same. The great mass of
pure hydrogen in the upper regions and the whole earth would be transformed into a
blazing inferno. Even with a bomb working with heavy hydrogen alone, the
homogeneous medium would ensure the sudden transformation of these layers into
helium. That would be the end. Perhaps it would be better than a slow ending.
If this should happen, the prophecy of Saint Peter, written in the last chapter of
his second letter, would be fulfilled:

Message Page 4 of 7
"But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the Heavens
shall pass away with a great noise and the elements shall melt with fervent heat,
the Earth ~o... shall be burned up."
No one will know when this day will be, because the blow would be struck by
surprise, without formal declaration of hostilities. Men will think they are safely
leading a normal life, when a madman presses the button, stabbing the Earth and
murdering its inhabitants. Man, for having sown all these years, life without God,
shall shortly reap a harvest of tares, because the ears of science are ripening
already.
Q: What are the elements which will bring about changes in the liver, causing
disease?
A: The radioactive elements will cause changes in proteins and these will attack
the liver. Radioactive carbon will alter the metabolism. Cobalt, which normally
helps to prevent anaemia, will, in this radioactive state, destroy the blood cells.
An isotope of strontium will unite with calcium and affect the bones.
Phosphorus, which is concentrated in the brain, will reach motor nerve centres and
radioactive iodine will work its way into the main glands of the body. Radioactive
aluminium and magnesium will influence the sex-glands. Because of the destruction
of parts of the hypothalamus, man will suffer from terrible hunger, but there will
be nothing to eat; others will 'have an uncontrollable sexual desire. If the
activity of the thyroid is impaired, it will upset the balance with the adrenal
glands, which will either produce an excess of adrenalin or none at all.
Q: What has the thyroid got to do with the adrenals?
A: In the case of a tiger, whose existence in the wild state depends on his
ferocity, the adrenals are twice the size of the thyroid, whereas in man, the
thyroid is large and the adrenal small. The relationship is obvious.
Q: Is all this a mere possibility, or is it all inevitable?
A: That is something I cannot answer. It is up to you on Earth to decide whether

all this stays in the realm of possibility,or whether you turn it into reality.
Man has free will. No one can tell him what he must do.
The only thing I can say is that these will be the consequences. Do not do as the
sorcerer's apprentice did, not knowing what he was toying with.
Men are letting off bombs, not realising that their effects are not always
immediate. It is like the saturation point in chemistry; one can keep putting drops
into a liquid without anything happening; then, suddenly the critical point is
reached and the whole solution changes. From then on, it is impossible to control
the reaction.
Persistent radioactivity in the upper layers of the atmosphere produces the same
effect. No one has gone high enough up from the Earth to measure and observe what
is happening. If you could have known Earth's luminosity before, seen from outside,
and could observe it now, you would see a difference. The radioactive dust which
stays in the stratosphere already gives rise to fear for the future of men.
If bomb tests continue, one day war will be thrust upon you, bringing with it
increased radioactivity. Let Earth's scientists explode bombs for another fifteen

Message Page 5 of 7
years and you will see the result of their madness. It will be too late. If anyone
could calculate the effect of two hundred hydrogen bombs upon the uppermost layer
of the ionosphere, he would want to shout from the housetops to put an end to this
folly.
Unhappily, my friend, Earth is in the hands of raving lunatics; they are unbalanced
enough to accuse us of lying if we tell the truth. Evil must come, but woe to him
who commits it. His fate is sealed. He should not imagine that he will not be
called to account for lives he has sacrificed to one interest or another. We all
expect a day of reckoning, when we shall be called upon to account for the gifts
that the Creator gave us.
The good need not worry, because God will know how to deliver them in the hour of
peril. The just will not suffer for the sinner. This only happens once, and it
happened a long time ago. If it were so decided, we ourselves could evacuate
Earth and remove the worthy from it. We have thousands of saucers, each one capable
of carrying thousands of people. However, we cannot intervene unless this be
decided from on high, when we would be told whom to deliver from this hell. Rest
assured that the just shall not be forsaken, because unseen eyes watch over this
little planet and they know full well who acts without evil intent.
Pick up your Bible, and read how Lot was delivered from Sodom when it was about to
be destroyed, and see the parallel. Read, also, how Enoch and Elijah were carried
up in a chariot of fire. There is therefore no difficulty at all about this, and if
we were to receive such an order we would carry it out to the full
Furthermore, if it were decided from on high that Earth ought to be destroyed we

would trust in the wisdom of this decision and carry out the orders without
hesitation. We would never question them, We would do as Abraham did, when he was
ready to sacrifice his son to do the will of God. We could, in a second, raze this
planet and leave nothing alive on its surface. The planet would be sacrificed in
the twinkling of an eye.
We have the means and we know how to use them. If Earth, after only a century of
scientific progress, can develop so great a destructive power, how much greater
must ours be; for at a time when Earth's people had not even attained to knowledge
of mathematics, we were already making interplanetary voyages, with cosmic energy
for propulsion.
Q: But could this happen? Would anyone be capable of ordering our destruction?
A: Perfectly well. It is not right that man's folly should endanger the stability
of the planetary system and destroy the lives of others far away.
The entry of a new Sun into our system will be less dangerous
than the explosion of the Earth's hydrogen cover. It would wreak havoc on several
inhabited planets. The unbalance of forces would be fatal to many, if it happened
suddenly. Then there would only be one preventive measure; destruction of all
living matter of Earth. It would be rendered sterile in a matter of seconds.
However, I am not in a position to make decisions of such magnitude, nor, for that
matter, is any inhabitant of any planet.
The time has come for scientists to stop and think, for man to cease thinking of
himself as the Lord of Creation and come down from the pedestal his vanity has put
him on, and realise that as he has been in the habit of oppressing the weak, the

Message Page 6 of 7
time could well come when someone stronger shall silence him.
The conquest of other planets and the subjugation of their inhabitants has already
been mooted. This is the height of human impertinence. It would also be suicide. We
would like to draw the attention of these people to the chapter of Isaiah which
reads as follows: "How thou art fallen from Heaven
O Lucifer, sun of the morning For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into
Heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will sit also upon the
mount of the congregation in the sides of the north. I will ascend above the
heights of the clouds, I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down
to hell, to the sides of the pit" (Isaiah I: i~: xii-xv). We could also remind you
of what happened to the men of Babel who tried to reach the heavens with their
tower. Today this tower again threatens the heavens, and is represented by earthly
science; let us hope there will be no need for us to knock it down.
So long as men waged their petty wars of conquest, we tolerated it all. We merely
kept our distance, avoiding further contact with those who could not understand us.
Now man constitutes a serious risk for everybody, and tomorrow it may be worse.
I do not know how all this will end; I do not even know whether men will mend their
ways, and far less whether a superior intelligence will go on tolerating them much
longer, or will resolve to act.
I am a being of very limited attainment and it is not within my grasp to say what
should be the fate of earthly things.
But it is time for man to stop and think. A little thought costs nothing.
Enough of this folly. Away with these crimes. His salvation is our salvation, may
he not force us to an act of desperation; may he not lead us into evil.
May he not bring us to the violence which we so thoroughly condemn and which we
would eternally rue. Let him live and allow us to live.
We know your affairs better than you know them yourselves; we know when the war
leaders meet and what they plan.
We are present at your cabinet meetings; we know the hypocrisy with which they
exchange platitudes; we read their motives.
Rest assured that we would act before they endangered us. We have orders to defend
ourselves.
We have done everything possible to show that there are powers superior to those on
Earth; we wished to show men that the possession of power does not give rein to
violence and that we have no desire to seize the planet. We have flown high, low,
singly and in formation.
We have performed aerobatics over cities, air bases, fortifications.
I personally received an order to move in against an armed aircraft which was rash
enough to open fire against my craft. But nothing convinces men on
Let him continue along the atomic road he is following. One day the end must come.

Message Page 7 of 7
Someone, either we, or man himself will press a button to end the story of a
humanity which preferred to die rather than to live happily in accordance with the
laws of God.

Message Page 1 of 6
Life on Other Worlds, Chap. 11

Q: Are all the planets inhabited?
A: Some are and some are not. In our system the following are inhabited: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars,
Uranus, Neptune and Pluto. Jupiter and Saturn are not inhabited, as they have no atmosphere. Jupiter
has one, but we cannot consider it as such, as it has virtually no depth, and Saturn has none at all.
It is a sphere of low density, almost entirely composed of heavy gases, with a small solid centre. It is a
world in formation. As it solidifies it will contract, liberating the elements that will eventually form its
atmosphere.
It could he that the entry of another Sun into our system will bring about a "cracking" process, by which
the denser elements will be precipitated.
Jupiter, also, is a new body which recently developed a rarefied atmosphere.
However, it is still unsuitable for life.
As these bodies become more dense they will move closer to the gravitational centre of our system, in
view of the fact that their diameters decrease and their density increases. They will thus be increasingly
subject to attraction, and decreasingly subject to repulsion. However, many of Jupiter's and Saturn's
satellites are inhabited.
Q: But can Mercury support life, when it is so near the Sun?
A: Certainly. Its great etheric mass filters the rays of the Sun. Bear in mind that whereas Earth's etheric
covering extends a mere 250,000 miles, Mercury's extends 390,000 miles.
God-or Nature, whichever you like to say-covers bodies to keep out cold, but in our case the opposite
takes place, the greater the heat, the greater the covering. If you calculate the speed of solar rays in
space as I showed you by checking the difference between the luminosity of the rising Sun and the Sun
at zenith, with the equatorial radius of the Earth as a base, you will see that Mercury, subject to intenser
radiation, has been given an etheric covering exactly large enough to filter these rays to a point where
they fill into the visible spectrum on reaching the surface of the planet.
From the calculation we made together you saw that the farther bodies are from the Sun, the less
covering they have, until we come to Saturn, which has none at all. Up to that point the ether and
atmosphere are there to filter the rays of the Sun. From Saturn outwards, however, the planets again
acquire an etheric cover on an increasing scale, no longer with the object of filtering the Sun's rays, but
to produce a positive reaction to them, so as to provide sufficient heat to maintain life. So the
atmospheric and etheric compositions of these planets are not the same as those of planets on this side
of Saturn.
The amount of diffused light is much greater than on Earth. Their atmosphere, though rarefied, is a good
conductor of heat, which may seem absurd to you.
Q: I find it hard to see how a distant planet can have an atmosphere sensitive to the rays of the Sun, in
view of the tiny fraction of light they receive.
A: There are many kinds of light. Its origin can also be chemical. Certain species of vegetation emit light

Message Page 2 of 6
under bacteriological action. Insects produce quite a strong light by utilising their own internal enzyme
reactions. You can make cold light by electrical discharges through gas.
Why then deny that Nature has other methods of giving life to a planet? Put an electric charge through a
tube of hydrogen and it will produce a bluish light; mix other gases with the hydrogen and you will obtain
other kinds of light.
What more spectacular demonstration could one wish for than that which takes places when one mixes a
small quantity of chlorine with water, and then subjects the mixture to a ray of light. This will give rise to a
violent explosion and emission of light and heat.
If similar reactions were produced within the atmosphere of the planets, avery small ray of light could
produce a tremendous reaction with vast magnetic storms.
Q: Have the beings on these planets a material form?
A: What do you expect them to be made of? They cannot be made of energy because only spirit is
energy.
Q: But is our constitution very different from that of the people of other planets?
A: There are differences, but the human form is Nature's chosen form. The metablism of a man from Pluto
is not precisely the same as that of an inhabitant of Mercury.
Nevertheless one can visit the other and remain alive for a long period.
A fish lives in a dense medium, but can keep itself alive for a certain time by breathing air. But the
difference between Pluto's and Mercury's atmospheres is not nearly as great as that between air and
water, so one could stay alive a long time.
Q: But has gravity no effect?
A: None. Gravity is an illusion, like others you entertain. We discussed how gravity is a combination of
phenomena, wherein an important part is played by the atmospheric covering which is responsible for
differences in density.
But we also came to the conclusion that all inhabited planets have an atmosphere, so the difference is a
small one. All have warmth, too, either by solar radiation or by chemical reaction.
The principal factor in gravity is the vertical component of magnetism, but the difference between one
planet and another is insufficient to prevent interchange between people of different planets.
Q: As regards appearance, what are the chief differences between the people of the various planets?
A: We cannot say, for example, that the people of Mercury are tall or short. There are all sorts, as you
have pigmies. However, their maximum stature is 5 ft. 10 in. They are strong, dark, intelligent, energetic
and active, with small eyes, no beards, low foreheads, well made noses. On Venus they reach 6 ft. They
belong to various races, predominantly a fair type. Their bodies are well made, but they are the most like
Earth people, both in appearance and in spirit. They are energetic, talkative, kindly, and above all,
spiritually minded.
On Mars there are two root races; one fair and one dark. The fair race is the most tractable and gentle.
The dark race is composed of people who are short of stature and of a lively disposition. They are the
gayest in the planetary system. There is no life on Jupiter, only on its satellites. But there is a great
variety of life on these heavenly bodies. There are all sizes, from men of 7 ft.4in. down to Lilliputian
beings.

Message Page 3 of 6
But we all live in the same family. The little people are in the majority.
There is no life on Saturn either. Due to its lack of atmosphere, its surface will be riddled with meteorites.
Two of its satellites are inhabited. There the men are intelligent and kind. They have their space crafts,
but they do not use them much. For you these beings would be quite inexplicable because they never die.
They possess what one might call the body of resurrection. They never commit any sin, yet they are
material beings. They are tall, with large magnetic eyes. Not even we can fathom all their wisdom, they are
enigmatic.
On Uranus and Neptune the inhabitants are very similar. They are tall and muscular, well built, with large
eyes and very well developed heads. Organically they function in a different way from the inhabitants of
other planets. They do not feed on heavy substances as we do, but on liquids or gases, and their blood is
different.
On Pluto life is very similar to that on Earth. The people are identical in nearly everything. But not
withstanding their advanced intelligence, they incline to evil and neglect God. They allow their baser
instincts to rule them.
They learned to travel though space a long time ago. They do not war among themselves-war, alas, only
exists on Earth. But they are dangerous beings, and any instances of saucers doing harm to people on
Earth can be attributed to them.
The only reason they do not harm any other inhabitants of the system is because they know that these
other beings are more evolved, and any attempt at conquest would be fatal. But their fate is sealed.
The people of Earth have committed many misdeeds, and this planet is regarded as the centre of evil, but
its inhabitants are yet in their infancy, and in the dawn of their intelligent life, with the exception of a small
elite who have settled down here as teachers. For this reason, God will punish humanity, but with
moderation, without expelling this planet from the solar system. Those who cannot adjust themselves to
the higher order of things will be evacuated from the planet, leaving it in the possession of others who
will be like the inhabitants of the satellites of Saturn. As for Pluto, justice will take its full course. Evil will
not be allowed to continue indefinitely. The transgression of law is not a natural phenomenon, because if
it were a basic condition for the evolution of individuals of various worlds, then it would itself become a
law. It is absurd to think that evil should itself be a law. There are only two tenets that can claim
immortality on any inhabited world, these are love of God and love of one's neighbour. Anything that
departs from these tenets is a transgression. The in-habitants of Pluto were fully aware of divine laws, but
chose to ignore them. They became prey to sexual pleasure and as a direct result of this laid themselves
open to other sins such as idolatry, sodomy, rebellion and disrespect for the physical integrity of others,
and so fell under the whole sway of evil. It is like an avalanche, which can start off with the fall of a small
stone, and finish up as a complete landslide.
For this reason, Pluto will be torn away from this system, and 'will wander towards the nearest
constellation. Its inhabitants will suffer untold horror and will not be able to escape. They will be
degraded to the state of cave men under atrocious conditions. The splendour of their cities, their rapid
transport systems, brilliant lighting and communications and, in fact, all that a highly intelligent humanity
can attain to through millennia of constant progress, beyond your imagination, will be written off and
crumble into ruin like historical Babylon, with its hanging gardens.
Then our system 'will return to normal and we shall become as one large family, all under the banner of
love.
Q: As far as I can gather from your statements, Earth will be left with a humanity similar to the inhabitants
of Saturn's satellites. Does this mean human beings will be changed?
A: This is exactly what I wanted to convey. Human beings have gone as far as they can go. Their
intelligence cannot go beyond the normal senses.
You talk in terms of biological evolution, but let us see if this is true or not. There should be a pari-passu

Message Page 4 of 6
development between intelligence and the physical body if this theory were true. Whereas intelligence
has reached a high stage of development, the body has been attacked by strange diseases which are on
the increase.
We thus get a picture of mental development accompanied by physical atrophy.
The human race has reached a point in its development where it should disappear.
Races are like men with their infancy and adolescence, maturity, old age and death.
The physical body as it is would not give intelligence very much more room for development. Earthly
science and techniques will reach such an advanced stage that the brain will no longer be able to cope
with the problems involved, which may have to be done by machines. Does this imply that inanimate
machinery is superior to spirit? Not at all. But this requires the appearance of a new race on Earth,
composed of beings with sufficient brain power to grasp all the increasingly complex problems
associated with progress. These bodies would have the capacity to take a further step along the path to
wisdom.
How can you talk of indefinite progress when you are bound to a body of limited capacity and of a low
order. It is wrong to say that Nature does not progress by sudden leaps. Its progress is based almost
entirely on this, as, for example, in the chemical combinations of carbon and hydrogen. Knowledge is
garnered until, at a given instant, there is an integral transformation of brain and body.
If one adds an atom of hydrogen to an atom of oxygen, the result is still a gas, but if a further atom of
hydrogen is added, there is a sudden transformation and they cease to be gases and turn into liquid. The
same thing happens in the case of carbon and hydrogen. CH2 is a gas, and we can go on adding to either
element without anything happening until we get to C2H4 when there is a sudden transformation and the
gas changes its characteristics radically.
There was no gradual change in the gas, but it preserved its characteristics until sufficient elements were
added to bring about the sudden transformation.
In life the process is the same. Many races are buried in the life cycle of a planer. Earthly science,
believing in natural selection, sought for the links in the chain of evolution. It did not find them, and never
will find them, because they do not exist.
It finds many things which are not links, which proves their non-existence. It is strange that all races have
left their traces on Earth, except those that constituted the links in the evolutionary chain. Why should
Nature have played such a trick to hide them if everything that exists is for man's enlightenment? This,
therefore, is not what happens.
When a race is no longer capable of keeping up the struggle against constantly changing climate and
circumstance, then the race disappears like any other living thing. If a sun has its old age and
disintegration, then why should this not also apply to a race?
What is impossible for man is easy for God. He can cause a planet to be inhabited in a moment.28
Q: But how can a planet come to be inhabited if all its people have perished?
A: God performs an act of resurrection.29 -
Q: How?
A: Spirit acts on matter and fashions it to its will where such super-physical phenomena are
commonplace, the spirit manipulates the ectoplasm of a passive agent and moulds from it a body which
is visible ~o the living. Its organism is real and its activity can be controlled. It has all the organs that a
normal individual has. After manifestation the ectoplasm is generally reabsorbed by the passive agent,

Message Page 5 of 6
and disappears. However, it would only need an act of will on its part to continue living a lifr of its own. In
many of these cases of manifestation hairs and pieces of clothing have been left and preserved intact. If
such fragments can remain in existence, there is no reason why a whole body should not remain. It would
only have to sever its connection with the passive agent.
If God were to ordain that a new race should populate the Earth, the spirits could manipulate the
ectoplasm of the Earth itself and create bodies from it, far superior to those of the present race. These
new beings would have fantastic bodies and brains. This is the act of resurrection I spoke of. If ordinary
spirits of a lower order can mould a body in accordance with their will, how much greater then would be
the power of God, should He decide to repopulate the Earth?
Q: Does this mean to say that the present race came into being in this way?
A: There is no doubt about it. Adam was in fact moulded from the dust of the Earth, that is to say, from its
ectoplasm. The ancient race had used up the whole of its evolutionary energy, and there had to be an
intervention of the heavenly powers which created the new race. This event is very clearly depicted in the
case of Eve. God caused Adam to fall into a deep sleep, using him as the passive supplier of ectoplasm,
and the body of Eve was moulded from this. She was, indeed, flesh of Adam's flesh, and the Biblical
narrator is correct when he stated that woman was moulded from Adam's rib.
Q: But is not ectoplasm a by-product of the nervous system? How could it be drawn from the Earth?
A: Everything is drawn from the Earth. Vegetables also have their ectoplasm and their roots draw it up
from the soil. If any power were capable of forming a new body, surely it would draw the necessary
elements for it from the ground. It would be a slight on the powers of the Supreme Spirit to think that He
who made matter should not also have the power to make ectoplasm.
Q: If there were an atomic disaster, and the planet became uninhabitable, how could the spirit mould new
bodies that could keep alive?
A: Lift could well be impossible for the body as it is now, but on the other hand it could be ideal for other
bodies. God creates types of beings to suit the medium in which they are placed. Earthworms live in the
same world as man, but the soil is their ideal medium; fish live in water; the amphibian can live in air or
water; the eagle prefers heights where the atmosphere is rarefied.
If life now manifests itself in various forms, do you think Nature has run through her repertoire and
exhausted her possibilities on Earth? A lion would die in the Arctic, whereas a bear is quite happy there.
Whether the Earth is covered with ice, whether it becomes too hot, whether it is radioactive or not,
Nature will in every case devise an appropriate life form. And if Nature, with this wonderful power of
creation, were supplemented by a spiritual power, what marvels could it not perform? Man will have to
disappear from the face of the Earth, and homo sapiens will be replaced by spiritual man, so long as he
allows Nature to effect this transformation quietly on her own. When the first man of the present race,
who was the resurrection of a dying race, made his appearance on the planet, there were still some men
of the old race left who were dying off.
There was no total disappearance of living beings from the planet. However, home sapiens appears to be
in a hurry to get to the end of his career and to deprive
Nature of its right to put an end to him by exhaustion. Perhaps it is just because he is bent on self-
destruction."
"There are various Biblical references to the complete destruction of living beings. In Isaiah we read the
following: "Until the cities be wasted without inhabitation ~ and the houses without man, and the land be
utterly desolate. And the Lord have removed men far away, and there be a great for salting in the midst of
the land" (Isaiah 6: xi-xii); "Through the wrath of the Lord of Hosts is the land darkened, and the people
shall be as the fuel of the fire: no man shall spare his brother" (Isaiah 9: xix); "The consumption decreed

Message Page 6 of 6
shall overflow with righteousness, for the Lord God of Hosts shall make a consumption" (Isaiah to: xxii-
xxiii); "Behold the day of the Lord cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land
desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it .
For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened
in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine. And I will punish the world for their
evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogance of the proud to cease, and will lay low
the haughtiness of the terrible. I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the
golden wedge of Ophir.
Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place..." (Isaiah 13: ix-xiii); .... for
the extortioner is at an end, the spoiler ceaseth, the oppressors are consumed out of the land" (Isaiah 16:
iv);
"Behold the Lord snaketh the land empty and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth
abroad the inhabitants thereof.... The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled for the Lord hath
spoken this word....
Therefore the curse devoured the earth, and they that dwell therein are desolate, therefore the inhabitants
of the earth are burned, and few men left.
The earth is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, and the earth is moved exceedinly. Thee
earth shall reel to and fro like a drunkard, and shall be removed like a cottage and the transgressions
there of shall be heavy upon it;and it shall fall,and not rise again"(Isaiah24)
While talking about destruction, they also assert that earth will be inhabited by other men: "Then shalt
thou say in shine heart, Who hast begotten me these, seeing I have lost my children, and am desolate, a
captive, and removing to and fro? and who hath brought up these? Behold I was left alone; these where
had they been?" (Isaiah 49: xxi); "They shall inherit the land for ever, the branch of my planting, the work
of my hands, that I may be glorified" (Isaiah 6o: xxi);
"For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth; and the former shall not be remembered nor come
into mind" (Isaiah 6~: xvii).
In seances 28" They are created now, and not from the beginning; even before the day when thou
heardest them not; lest thou shouldest say, Behold, I knew them" (Isaiah 48: vii).
29St. Clement of Alexandria, a disciple of Panthaenus, who was in turn a disciple of St. John, when
talking about resurrection, indicated that this was a phenomenon which occurred at regular intervals in
the world, q.v. Letters to the Corinthians, Ch. 24. He maintains that the human race is created and lives
until it is in time succeeded by another. In Chapter as of the same letter, he gives the divine phoenix as an
example, which is born from the body of its predecessor when it is ageing and near death. According to
other Fathers of the Church, the human race rarely survives more than 7,000 years, having in this time
exhausted its capacity to adapt itself to a constantly changing medium.

Message Page 1 of 4
FAREWELL! Chap. 12
We met at the Roosevelt station in Sao Paulo. To begin with we continued our
discussion on various scientific subjects, and later talked about ethics and
religion. Then he said to me: "Now I am going. If you wish to see me again, meet me
on Angatuba Avenue between November 14th and 17th, 1956. Should there be any hitch
from your side, I will see you again in 1959 if you are still here. Once again I
shall keep my word.
"I should like you to always remember one thing, do not attach too much importance
to all the scientific things we have talked about.
Science is only a means of giving us certain facilities, and of teaching us how to

use the forces of Nature. Seek that science which will bring happiness to all, and
above all seek God because only He has meaning in the Universe. Love is the true
science.
"What shall it avail man if he knows all things and all the secrets of the
Universe, if he should lose his soul? Science is like a law, it is only beneficial
when it guarantees the tights of man, and when it protects, shelters and serves
him. If it loses its protective character and becomes oppressive, then it is time
it was abolished and replaced by another. Such laws cannot and should not be
respected.
It is like the salt that Christ referred to, if the salt should lose its savour and
its strength, it should be cast away. Science exists so that man may live well and
that there should be an abundance of all things. But if this science, instead of
being a gift of God, should become a source of destruction to the human race, then
it should be put aside.
A man can live without science, enjoying all the things that Nature provides; but
with no spirit of compassion and respect for the lives of others, life on Earth
would be inexorably destroyed. God does not destroy anyone, but man the aid of
science could destroy himself and his fellows.
"Do not seek the salvation of your soul through science. If this were a means of
spiritual progress, on this false basis, men would have arrived in hell long ago.
The possession of scientific knowledge has no significance.
Without it many could lead a spiritual life, but with it millions will meet nothing
but affliction. Of what use is knowledge that used a whole people as guinea pigs,
killing thousands, destroying innocent people and bringing grief to those Japanese
cities whose names remain as milestones on the road to destruction.
"It is to no avail. All of us who travel through space, men from different planets,
are moved when we see those cities and never tire of saying that here was where the
first blow of brute power struck the Earth and its inhabitants.
Here are the paths which lead to Armageddon. Here Christian people crucify Jesus
again and proclaim the supremacy of the Beast who is to rule the Earth. It is a
pity that human beings have insufficient scientific knowledge to dominate all
Nature, and not be as poor as they are now. Since science is a great evil for them,

Message Page 2 of 4
it would be better to live without it, because then they would at least live.
It is preferable to live in ignorance and allow others to live than for all to be
drowned as a result of a little knowledge.
"They worship Christ in vain and fruitlessly pay homage to Him. The only thing that
He wishes is that they should love one another.
Man should not pray so much with pretty words; God is not moved by rhetoric. Rather
should they make a constant prayer of their own lives and their love for their
neighbour.
"There is yet time to save the world, an opportunity is always given to him that
repents. There is no criminal who cannot be pardoned. If the crime is great, God's
love is greater still. If man needed time to be pardoned, God could make a fraction
of a second into an eternity.
Divine acts are not subordinate to time and space. This is the reason why some
criminals, in a moment of repentance, become saints and martyrs. For an instant
they departed from the ways of evil with all the power of their heart, and by
divine action this second's repentance was made permanent.
If God cares so much for a single soul, should He not care that much more for
humanity? Therefore pay more attention to spiritual things and use science as a
means of explaining them.
"I know that you will refuse to tell others about the meetings we have had, but one
day you will have to do so by force of circumstance. Do not imagine, however, that
when you do tell others, they will take much notice. Many have spoken without any
apparent result, and the only reward you should expect is something which nobody
can take away, because it exists within your heart alone. But there may be someone
unknown to you to whom your work will be of great value.
"And now, farewell! I shall take with me some books in order to study Earthly
science a little more. When I return I will do my best to bring you something in
writing about our science and our ethics. Until that time we shall be linked in
thought."
"Supposing I am not here when you come back," I asked him.
"It would perhaps be better if you were not here, because then you would be
somewhere else where it would be easier for us to make contact. But do not leave
without telling your friends that life extends through the infinities of space from
sphere to sphere and from world to world, and that beyond death there is hope and
consolation. Tell them that wherever there is spirit, God will have prepared a
vehicle for it. In life, swans are mute, but they never depart without a song."
He gave me his hand and took leave of me again. I would like to have followed him
to the place where he was to board his saucer, but he told me: "Why follow me? Do
not come 'with me. My saucer is quite close and it would not be pleasant for you to
see the circumstances in which I leave; you would be upset. There is always a
moment of separation and before I got into the saucer you would no longer be able
to see me. May God be with you."
I saw him vanish round a corner. I had a strong desire to follow him at any cost,
but decided that this would be disloyal to someone who had shown such friendliness
to me.

Message Page 3 of 4
CONCLUSION
We have given an account of things as they happened, and have told you what we
heard. The ideas expressed in this book, whether they be good or bad, are not our
own.
We have tried to render them as we heard them, using our notes as a basis. Nothing
has been added. We have, on the contrary, had to cut out a great deal, partly to
avoid making the book too long, and partly because we saw no point in publishing
things that could not help to solve our most immediate problems.
What would be the point in discussing the use of anti-electrons in breaking down
matter, if this process were only to be used as yet another weapon of destruction,
instead of being put to a constructive use? We already have enough ways of slaying
one another.
Would that man did not use the knowledge he already has to the detriment of other
people's lives and property.
All we have endeavoured to do, is to expound the ideas which could be used to
improve human relations. Even in this sphere we have left a number of topics
pending, until we see how this book is received. We have naturally not said very
much about how saucers fly, and even less about the scientific methods used to give
them their phenomenal stability.
It seemed unfair to publicise things that could be of use to our own country in
solving many of the pressing problems that face it. With its vast area, its
impoverished population in the interior, no country could derive greater benefit
from a craft of almost unlimited speed and payload than Brazil.
The saucer is a vessel which makes all our knowledge of aerodynamics obsolete.
Its speed and carrying capacity are unaffected by its shape, which can be tailored
to fit the cargo. Saucers can be made bell-shaped, flat, cigar-shaped, square,
oval, etc. They are far more than winged cargo ships. Ten of these craft could
transport the whole of the harvest from the Parana in a matter of minutes without
having to have special landing fields built for them.
Roads and railways, slow and susceptible to climatic conditions, would lose their
importance. In fact, one of the purposes of this book was to try to illustrate the
forces the saucers use to navigate in our atmosphere, and the means they use to
travel through space on interplanetary voyages.
Many people believe that saucers are Earth-made craft; others believe them to have
come from other worlds. Some people even go so far as to assert that they hail from
underground cities belonging to a civilisation that had hidden there to avoid
contact with us. We have not gone into a discussion about their origin as this
could not benefit anyone.
Why should people worry about where they come from?
What could be of great interest to our tortured and problem-ridden planet would be
to know the methods they use, and then to modify our Earthly knowledge accordingly,
and see whether we could not do the same thing, or at least something like it.
Anything else is merely arid, academic discussion of no practical interest.

Message Page 4 of 4
However, that is entirely our own point of view and the reader may well disagree
with it. Our only crime consists in claiming to have been in contact with beings
who say they are from another world. It is up to the reader to form his own
judgment; whether this be one of criticism or of praise, our own conviction will
remain quite unshaken.
It does not really matter whether people believe saucers come from outer space,
from the Earth, or from below the Earth:
we know that the things that have been revealed to us are true, and we have good
reason for saying this. Let us not forget the injunctions that man should follow a
path of peace and compassion.
An appeal has been made at a time when the trumpets are summoning humanity to the
holocaust that is to take place in the valley of Jehoshaphet, in honour of the god
of war.
He has given us a categorical affirmation of the existence of God at a moment when

the world is wallowing in iniquity, and has appealed to man to do good and to
follow the path of moderation and restraint.
If he were only blessed with the capacity for making men remember God and follow
his Commandments, and proving that everything written by the early Christians was
true, anything else would, by comparison, be unimportant.

My Contact With UFO&#39;s

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

My Contact With UFO&#39;s

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Message Page 1 of 10

Subject: fs1 - Contact with UFO's

My Contact with UFO's by Dino Kraspedon chapter one

Preface to this second edition Introduction A Pleasant Surprise.

God Matter and Energy

Olaf Roemers Experiments

The Aberation of light

Man wasted Efforts

The atomic danger

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

Life on other worlds

Farewell and Conclusion

(The Captain of the Flying Saucer)

Preface to Second Edition

We have said that gravity is a combination of phenomena in which the atmosphere

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

Moscow, 26th September, 1957

(signed) Constantin Chugunov.

(Head of the American Department of Voks).

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

to the book itself, but to the whole subject of flying saucers.

Sao Paulo. November 1957.

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

This book does not contain all the information we received,

As far as was possible we have avoided bringing in religious questions, since an

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

the truly wise.

It is possible for anyone to make a correct observation, yet draw false

Everything is forgivable in man within the concept of perfection which we hold.

We believe these other stories, for we believe in other people's honesty.

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

"What does he want?" I asked apprehensively.

We won't be able to go out with the children now," I remarked.

Sitting downstairs, however, I found a well-dressed man in a good cashmere suit

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

*1 In the beginning God created.

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

What is your name?" I asked him.

"I come from a satellite of Jupiter."

"From which satellite?"

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

that what appeared to be perfectly understandable to us may seem ridiculous to

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

God, Matter and Energy, Chap. 2

Q: Are you referring to the ether?

Q: What particular terms are you referring to? Mathematical ones?

A: No, theological ones rather than mathematical.

Q: What have matter and energy to do with theology?

Q: Did you say created?

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

Your attention must have been drawn to an interesting peculiarity of electricity: if we

A: If waves cannot rotate round a nucleus, particles certainly cannot.(5)

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

All the intrinsic energy of an electron, supposing an electron to be a particle, would be

(*7) If photographic plates are bombarded by parallel streams of electrons, these

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

force which gives rise to these must also be arbitrary.

If we do not regard an electron as a wave form, there is no explanation for molecular

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

would still move through space.

file://F:\IAeSR\BOOKS_Science\PDFs_PS_docs\PATENTS\DISCOID AIRCRAFT-UFO's... 7/7/2008

If this definition of the Universe is correct, God is an oscillating charge superimposed on

were to regard universes as points instead of scattered masses,

we might get somewhere.

My Contact With UFO's

My Contact With UFO's