Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
:
. .
,
, ,
()
. .
,
. .
ISSN 18110916
:
-
()
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
,
- ,.-.
,
, ,
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
,
,
............................................................................................. 3
I.
. . (-).
................................ 5
. . ().
...................................................................................... 13
. . ().
............................................................... 20
. . ().
....................................... 29
. . ().
.............. 37
. . ().
.............. 44
. . , . . ().
,
............................................... 51
. . ().
....................................................................... 54
. . ().
...................................................................................... 61
. . , . . , . . ().
? ..................................................................................................... 69
. . (), . . (-).
.............................................. 76
II.
77-2553
()
, 2008
. . ().
.......................... 86
. . (). ? .............. 93
. . ().
..................... 101
. . ().
...................... 108
. . ().
: ...................................... 116
. . ().
..................................................................................... 120
. . , . . ().
:
........................................................................ 126
. . ().
.......................................................................... 131
. . ().
( ) ...................................................................................... 140
. . ().
double bind ............................................................... 145
. . ().
.................................................................................... 155
. . ().
............................................ 161
2 (23) 2008
. . ,
. . ,
. .
III.
. . ().
........................................................................ 186
. . , . . (). ,
......... 194
. . , . . ().
.......................................................................................... 201
. . ().
................................................................................................. 207
. . ().
( ) ..................................................................... 214
. . ().
............................................................... 219
. . ().
XXI .................. 226
. . ().
(- ) .............................................. 233
. . ().
............................................................ 241
. . ().
.................................................................................... 249
. . (). -
.................................................. 255
. . ().
.................................................. 262
. .
. . ,
. . .
:
630126
,
. , 28
. 268-16-71
07.06.2008
70 108/16.
.
.
.-. 25 .
.-. 25,5 .
1000 .
307.
.
630090
,
, 2
!
2008 . ( ) XXII .
,
. , 1819 2008 .
.
, , , . ,
, ,
. ,
, .
. . , . , , : , . ,
, : , . , .
(. : , 2008 ., 4). ,
. ,
2007 . 1,2 .,
20082009 . 5
. (.: , 2008 ., 3).
, , ,
. ,
. , ,
, ( ) -
.
. , .
,
, .
,
,
. .
I.
I
Part I. MODERN SOCIETY AND EDUCATION
1(075.8)
. . (-)
. . -
. .
, . .
: , , , , .
V. A. Rabosh (Saint-Petersburg)
This article is devoted to the features of a synergetic approach to the question
of stable development in the educational sphere. The problems are investigated
in the context of philosophical-anthropological studies concerning the
organizational basis of the education systems stable development. The author
carries out a theoretical-methodological analysis of the synergetic basis of the
stable development concept. The problems of the optimal conditions for selfrealization and self-development of the person are considered. The author
substantiates the ideas of a modern pedagogy of co-authorship and unity. The
, ,
, . . . .
181190, . -, . . , . 48.
-mail: fphchel@herzen.spb.ru
concept apparatus of the modern conception of stable development is specified
and concretized from the position of synergetic approach: synergy, selforganization, co-evolution, resonance education, steady development and others.
Key words: synergy, self-organization, co-evolution, resonance education,
steady development.
, , , .
. . , , , ,
. , , , , . ,
,
. , , .
, , ,
( , (know how). . ,
, .
, , . , [1, . 321].
, . ,
-
,
. -,
[2, . 57].
, , , . ,
,
.
,
I.
, , , .
, , .
, , , .
, (. ), , .
, . . . . ,
, . , , , , , , , [3, . 286].
. , , .
[4; 5]
,
, [6].
,
. ,
. , , . . . ,
,
.
, , , , ,
() , . ,
.
,
.
7
, , .
. .
( )
, ,
, , . :
, , . ,
.
; ,
. , , .
, .
. ,
. , , () , , , , ,
[7, . 1215]. ,
, .
.
, , ,
,
.
()
,
.
, , ,
, , .
,
.
, ,
8
I.
. ,
. ,
.
,
,
. ,
. ,
.
,
, , . , .
XX ., [8, . 99].
, ,
.
, ,
( ) . :
,
, , . ,
, ,
, , , .
. ( , ) (
) , .
, . - , ,
(. ).
, , ,
. ,
, : , .
,
? , ,
.
. , , . , : , .
. , ,
, , . .
( ),
, , .
,
, , .
, ,
, , , ,
. . , ,
. , ,
( ) [9, . 159170].
, , , , -, , .
, .
10
I.
. . , , ,
, , , ,
[10, . 12]. , , .
, , , . . , . , . , . . , . . , . . . , , , . ,
.
. , . , . ,
. . , . , . . , , , , . . -,
. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . ,
.
. ,
. , . , . ,
[11, . 3643].
.
( ) , . (. ), , , ,
( , ), ,
,
, . , , . - , 11
, , , .
, ,
, ,
,
.
- , , ;
, , .
, .
, , , ,
, .
1. , . . /
. . // : . ., 2006.
2. : . ., 2007.
3. , . . / . . , . . . . :
, 2002.
4. , . . : . . . / . .
., 2003.
5. , . . IX : . . . /
. . ., 1995.
6. , . . / . . . ., 2002.
7. , . .
: . . . . / . . , 2007.
8. , X. / . // . ., 1988.
9. , . . : - / . . , . . . . : - , 2004.
10. , . . / . . . ., 2000.
11. , . . / . . . - .-.
. -, 2004.
12
I.
1 + 37
. . ()
. . .
, , . ,
. . ,
, .
: , , , , .
A. P. Fomin (Volkhov)
The article is dedicated to the philosophical substantiation of the special
status of education in the modern changing society. Pedagogical theory declares
as its goal the formation of creative and harmonic personality. However, the
education policy aims more and more at transforming the education into the
market of education services. The first purpose reflects the postmodern epoch,
which uses all the experience of the past, present, and future. The second purpose
reflects the epoch of the modernist style: that is, the past of our education.
This contradiction is to be solved by the education itself. However, it will only be
possible if education is considered not only as a social institute but as a special
sphere of social reality.
Key words: human essence, culture, cultural senses, postmodernist style,
synergetic approach, bifurcation points.
,
: , , ,
, , , , , , . . . . .
181190, . -, . . , . 48.
E-mail: fapfme@yandex.ru
13
. ( ) , ( )
, .
-
, , .
,
: , , . , .
,
, () . (
)
.
,
.
,
.
,
, , . , - . . , . . , . . , ,
.
,
.
,
, , ?
,
(
)
( ),
.
, , , ,
( ). ,
14
I.
,
. , ,
,
, , , , , , . , ,
. ,
, . ,
,
, , , , . , , : ?
, , , , , . ,
, . .
. , . [1] : ,
, .
: -,
; -, . , ,
, . ,
,
, .
,
, . . .
, , , , . : ! , , , ,
15
. , .
, ; , ,
[2, . 431]
, . - . , , , , ,
. , . ,
,
; ,
, , , , .
, , , : - -
,
, . - , , ,
- , , , .
, , , - ,
. ., , . ,
.
, ,
,
. . , , , ,
.
, ; ,
, , , , ,
, , ,
,
[3, . 370]. , 16
I.
, , , , ,
, , , [4, . 66]. , , , ,
. , , ,
, , ;
.
, , , . , , :
[: , . . .],
, ,
.
, ,
,
[2, . 444]. , , ,
, , , ,
[2, . 233].
,
- ,
- - ,
, , , , , , - .
- . . [5] .
, , ,
. ,
, -, , 17
, ; -, , ;
-, , ,
. , ,
,
( ) , . , , , , .
, , , , , , .
- , , , ,
, , , . ,
, . ;
, ,
, , , , , .
, , , -, ,
,
, , , . , :
, ,
, .
,
,
- .
. ,
18
I.
. , , : . , . , , ,
, , , .
, , , , - , , :
, , [6, . 327]. : , (, , , ,
), , .
, , . , ,
, , de novo (),
, ;
. <> , , ,
[6, . 337]. , , . ,
.
, , ,
. ,
- .
, , , , , : . ,
.
,
, , , . ,
19
. , : ; ; ;
; ;
; ; .
1. , . : . . / . ; . . .
. . . . : , 1990. 456 .
2. , . . / . . ; .
. . . ; . . . . . . : , 1977. 704 .
3. , . / . ; . . ; . .
. ; . . . . : , 1994. 591 .
4. , . . . / . . . . . : ,
2000. 480 .
5. , . . / . . , . . ; ., . . . // . 10- . . . . . : , 2002. 532 .
6. , . / . ; . .
. . . . : : , 2005. 588 .
130.2
. . ()
-
.
.
: - . ,
.
, , . . . .
390039, . , . , . 31, . 1, . 373.
-mail: n-agapova@mail.ru
20
I.
: - , , , , .
N. G. Agapova (Ryazan)
The aim of the article is to reveal the possibilities of system-synergetic approach
to the interpretation of the existence of a great number of educational paradigms
as a regular phenomenon. The problem is that there is no explanation of the fact
that a great number of paradigms are distinguished in the theory and practice
of modern education. The question is whether it is possible to explain the existence
of a great number of educational paradigms as a regular phenomenon using
the system-synergetic approach to the history of culture. The article is devoted
to the possibilities of system-synergetic approach, which reveals non-linear process
f rise, co-existence, and competition of different education paradigms in the
stable and unstable periods of the development of society and culture.
Key words: system-synergetic approach, educational paradigm, history of
culture, co-existence of paradigms.
[1]
, , , . ,
,
. ( )
, , . .
()
[2, . 19].
, , ,
, , :
,
.
21
, , ( ) , :
,
,
.
, , (, , , , , )
, ,
.
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
,
.
-
,
. . . ,
, ,
, ,
, , , - [3, c. 79] .
, , ,
, - ,
22
I.
, - , ,
,
.
, , ,
, .
: , -, , ,
,
, , .
, , , , , ,
.
,
, - ,
. ,
, , , ,
.
,
, , , , ,
, , .
23
, , , .
, ( ) . , .
.
, , , , , ,
,
,
,
[4, . 41]. ,
,
, ,
, .
,
;
, : , , ,
, . ,
, , , , ,
, [3, . 350]. , ,
24
I.
, , . ,
, , , , ( ).
, , ,
,
, , . , , , ,
,
. , ,
, ,
, ,
, , .
, . ,
,
, , . , ,
,
. , , , , . ,
, . 25
, ,
,
, .-. .
, - ,
. , , ( . ), , ,
, .
, .
.
.
, , (
) -.
, ? . . , ,
,
, , , : - ( ), , .
, : ,
, . ,
, ,
.
26
I.
: , ,
, , .
-
, , .
-, ,
, , , ,
,
, .
-, . , , , ,
,
,
.
, [5]. , , , .
, , ,
.
, , . . , ,
. , : [6].
, , , , ( ) ,
,
, , , , . 27
, , ,
, .
-
, (, , ); , ,
. , , .
, , . , , ,
, . ,
( ). ,
.
, -
, (
) , , . ,
, , ,
.
,
,
, ,
.
, ,
,
.
28
I.
1. , . . / . . , . . // . 2002. 4. . 5460.
2. , . . / . . , . . // . 2005.
9. . 1725.
3. , . . . . 1 / . . . . :
, 2003. 368 .
4. , . . / . . . . : , 2003. 284 .
5. , . / . . // . 2004. 14. . 68.
6. , . . : /
. . // . 1997. 2. . 39.
37.0 + 0.13 + 46
. . ()
.
; .
, .
: , , , .
O. V. Petunin (Kemerovo)
The article provides the characteristic of the civilizational approach with
the reference to pedagogical systems and processes. It describes the differences
between formational and civilizational approaches, reveals strengths and
weaknesses of each approach, and shows the specificities of application of the
civilizational approach to the analysis of pedagogical processes by various
researchers. The article makes a conclusion that the educational system in any
, , ,
.
653050, , . , . , . 17, . 156.
E-mail: petunnin@yandex.ru
29
country is impossible if the historical and socio-cultural regularities of the
development of this particular country are not taken into consideration.
Key words: civilizational approach, civilization, pedagogical processes,
modernization, education.
, , , , ,
.
.
. . .
[1, . 215].
, , , , ( , . .) [1, . 215].
. . , . ()
, () () ,
.
, :
() , , , , - ( , , , , , . .);
, - , . .;
, .
,
, . , . , [11, . 34].
. . . . . ,
, - . , [6, . 5].
, ,
. ,
, 30
I.
( ,
, , . .),
.
.
( ),
. ,
.
,
, . . XIX . . ,
() . . ,
.
XVIII .,
.
. ,
. , . , (. , . .).
. . , . . , . . , . . .
. . , . . , . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . , . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . ., - . , . .
. . .
,
, . - , , , ,
.
, , . -, . . ,
.
-, , .
31
, , ,
( ).
-, - . , , - .
, -, - , , - ,
[11, . 20].
, . . , : () (), ,
, , [2, . 15].
. , , , ,
,
. ( ),
. . . , . , . .
,
. , , XXI . , , , , (), .
, , (,
, ). , . . ,
. ,
, ,
.
32
I.
,
. ( , ), ( ) [3, . 132133].
,
.
, . . : , .
.
[6, . 23].
,
, .
,
(, , , . .),
.
.
:
, , . , , , [3, . 131].
.
. . . - , . , ()
- . ,
. . , , , - .
[5, . 81].
. . . , , , 33
. , - , . . , .
- , . . , , , : ; -;
; ; [5, . 85].
, ,
, , ,
, ,
,
, .
. . :
,
;
,
-, -
- ;
, ,
;
() () [5, . 85].
,
. . ,
.
.
,
,
. . , , , .
. . - , , ,
[4, . 43].
34
I.
. . . .
(-, - -),
.
. . , , , , [7, . 206].
, . . , , , - . , , . ,
. . -
. . .
, ,
. , , -
(
), - , - (
, ,
. . ), - [4, . 45]. , , , ,
. , , , , . , ,
: ,
?
-
. - , ,
,
. ,
, , ,
35
[5, . 46].
. , (. , . ).
.
. ,
[10, . 53].
- .
, - - ,
.
, [9, . 7].
.
- , , , ,
, .
- . , ,
- .
. . , - ,
( ), (), ( ) ( ).
, , , , , .
, .
, , . ,
36
I.
- , .
1. , . . / . . . . :
, 1989.
2. , . . : / . . // . . : , 1993. . 2. . 1427.
3. , . . : . // . . , . . ;
. . . . . : -, 2001.
4. , . . // . . // . 1995. 6. . 3748.
5. , . . - / . . . . : , 1994.
6. , . . / . . // . 1996. 2. . 1832.
7. , . . / . . . . : , 2005.
8. , . . , / . . // . . : , 1991. . 1.
. 1529.
9. , . . / . . // . 1991. 5. . 316.
10. , . . / . . // . 1990. 5. . 4659.
11. , . . ( ) / . . . . : . , 1996.
376
*
. . ()
. , * , 07-06-00159-.
, , , -
( ).
679016, , . -, . 4.
E-mail: carpi@rambler.ru
37
, ,
. . ,
.
: , , ,
.
V. N. Nikitenko (Birobidzhan)
The purpose of the work is to analyze the opportunities and directions of
nurturing the culture of interethnic relations in polyethnic communities of Russia.
The common and particular in the culture of interethnic relations and
tolerance concepts are investigated. The data of sociological surveys on the
culture of interethnic relations in polyethnic communities in Far East region of
Russia are cited. Some proposals concerning realization of the educational
opportunities of nurturing the culture of polyethnic youth communities are put
forward.
Key words: youth polyethnic communities, educational opportunities,
interethnic communication, interethnic relations
. , ,
, ,
.
( ) . :
, , , . , , ,
[2].
,
.
, , ,
-
. 1000 ,
38
I.
.
[5; 6; 12].
,
.
, ;
,
,
, - .
.
, ( )
, . ( ), ( ).
(2002 .) ,
.
.
,
,
, , ; ,
.
, ,
:
,
, ; ;
;
, ;
,
,
, ; ;
,
(,
39
).
,
. ,
, , . ,
. , .
.
,
, ,
, .
, , ( ), , , - .
- .
, , , , , , .
, .
,
[13].
,
. , ( , ) : , , . ,
, ,
.
-
40
I.
[15]. . . ,
( ).
, . , , ,
.
, .
. . ,
, [1].
. . [7]. . . ,
[16].
. . , , , ,
[10]. - . . , . . , . . ,
, [3], [11], [14].
,
,
:
,
; , ;
;
( ) .
,
:
41
;
( ,
, ,
. .);
; ,
.
,
, . , .
. ,
.
- .
.
:
, ;
, , , ;
, , , ;
, ;
:
;
42
I.
;
.
,
, . , , .
,
.
1. , . . / . . . , 1956.
2. , . . : . / . . , . . , . . . ., 1998.
3. , . . / . . . , 1979.
4. , . . : .
. . / . . , 2000.
5. , . .
: . .. . : 2 . / . . , . . ; . . . .
, 2007. . 1. . 8184.
6. , . .
/ . . , . . ; .
. . , . . // : . . . .-. . (, 17 2007 .) : 2 . : , 2007. . 2. . 5761.
7. , . . / . . . ., 1946.
8. , . . : . / . . . .,
2002.
9. , . .
: . . . . / . . ., 2001.
10. , . . : / . . . , 2001.
11. , . . / . . . ,
1999.
12. , . .
/ . . // .
2007. 8. . 184186.
13. : . / . . . . ., 2004.
43
14. , . . -:
/ . . ; . . . . . ., 1998.
15. : . / . . . . , . . . 2-
., . . ., 1990.
16. , . . : / . . .
, 2006.
130.2
*
. . ()
, . ,
. . , . . , . . ,
, , , . ,
, - .
: ,
, , .
M. A. Abramova (Novosibirsk)
In the article, the author considers formation of a strategy of intercultural
interaction between peoples in the pre-revolutionary and Soviet Russia, as well
as the socially - consolidating function of the Russian humanitarian culture in
this process. Based on the works of Feodosii, P. F. Kapterev, M. M. Bakhtin,
D. S. Likhachev, and the results of the research on the features of the world
* 2007 .
: ( ())
, .
630090, . , . , . 8.
E-mail: marika24@yandex.ru
44
I.
perception of northerners, the conclusion is made that the creation of a legal
state in Russia is impossible without development of a concept representing the
basic categories that determine the process of the civil society formation. In these
conditions, multicultural policy may become a starting point enabling to
formulate and create the legislative instruments that reflect the state national
politics.
Key words: multicultural communication, ethnic identification,
integration, sociallyconsolidating function of humanitarian culture.of the world
of northerners is judged existence in Russia world outlook preconditions for
realization of a politics multicultural.
,
, , , . ,
. , , , : , ,
. , . , ,
, .
, . , , .
, ,
.
, , , ,
.
,
. ,
. , .
, ( ) . : (-
45
) ( ,
). . , . ,
.
. , , , .
. , ,
. , .
,
-
.
. XVI . , ,
, , :
, , , [.
: 1, . 203].
, . , XIX .
. .
-
. , . , . ,
, . , . , . , . , . , . ,
. , . , . , . , . ,
. .
. , - . ,
, .
- . , . .
46
I.
: , , , ,
[2, . 80]. ( ) , .
. , -- . , 1897 .
. 1920 .
(
) ( ).
. , . , ,
,
.
: .
. :
. ,
.
.
, . , . , .
, ,
.
,
,
,
.
.
, , , , , , . . .
47
20062007 . 2000 , ( 15 27 ).
,
, , .
, :
, : , , , , ,
( . . ). 60,9 % .
:
31,2 % , 18,6 % , 25,3 %
, 0,9 % , 24 % .
, ,
.
, .
. ,
, . , ,
.
. , . ,
, .
, . , , .
,
. ,
,
.
, , - .
, , , . , -
48
I.
, ,
.
, , , , . , , .
- - .
: , - . , .
, ,
.
- . .
. . ,
- ; , .
. . . , , . . , , .
, , . . .
,
. , , , ,
; , [3, . 170].
49
. . ,
,
.
, ,
. [4, . 38].
,
, , .
XXI . [5, . 109].
(2004 .) . :
. , , , , ,
. , . , ... [6, . 17].
.
, , . , , - .
(, , , ).
1. , . . : /
. . , . . . ., 1991. 280 .
2. , . . / . . //
. . : , 1986.
3. , . . XIX / . . // . 1984. 4.
4. , . . / . . . ., 1989.
5. , .-. / .-. // . ., 2002.
6. (2004). ().
. : , 2004.
50
I.
101.1 + 316
*
. . , . . ()
. , - ;
; . ,
.
; , .
: , , , , , .
51
fetish and potential image. The fetish prevents the optimization of social
management; the potential image promotes the optimization of social
management, including reforms in the system of the education in RF.
Key words: rational, irrational, public consciousness, fetish, potential
image, social information.
. ,
, ( ,
, ).
, , -, ; -, . . - ,
? .
, , .
, ,
. , . ,
. - ,
. , ,
.
( , ,
, 10 2000 .).
:
,
, [. : 1].
. , ,
. .
52
I.
,
,
[. : 1]. , .
,
,
, ( ,
). , ,
. , . ,
, . ,
(), ().
.
-
.
[2].
-
, [.: 2,
c. 100199]. , .
. , , , . () , .
. - , , . ( )
. , ,
, ,
.
, ,
, () ()
.
, .
53
, , () () .
1. : .
10. 01. 2000 / http://www. Nationalsecurity.ru /library/00002/00002 concept 2.htm
2. , . . - (- ) / . . . : - : - ,
2007. 248 .
37.0
. . ()
. , ; ; ;
. , , - .
: , ,
.
E. A. Pushkareva (Novosibirsk)
The author considers the problem of significance of knowledge and
information for the development of modern society. The basic questions analyzed
by the author are the following. What is the similarity and difference between
the concepts of knowledge and information? What are the prominent features
of modern knowledge as a general area of science and education? What are the
ways of development of scientific and educational knowledge? What are the
directions the knowledge development of the society and individual?
Key words: information, scientific and educational knowledge, the modern
society of knowledge.
, .
630126, . , . , 28, . 204.
E-mail: Pushkarev73@mail.ru
54
I.
. ,
, ,
,
. , , [1, . 189].
, , ,
, .
:
. ,
( - ), . , , .
, , 50- . ; , . (. ),
(. . ), (. ), (. ), (. ),
, (. ), (. ) . . , . , .
, ( ).
? , . , .
, , ,
. , . . .
,
XXI ,
, [2]. ,
, . ,
( ),
, -
55
() [2, . 21].
,
.
, .
, . ,
. . , .
, .
, : ,
.
,
. , , [3, . 3536].
, , ,
. , , , .
-, , , , [4].
, , , , . , , - ,
, ,
, .
: XXI
, [2, . 22].
, ,
, , . , - 56
I.
. ,
,
( , ), -
[2, . 23]. , , .
, . , - ,
, , . -
,
, , ,
, .
, . -
, . , ,
-,
.
, .
, ,
,
[2, . 21]. ,
-- , .
, .
(. . [2], . . [5]). .
,
( ).
( ).
,
57
( ), ( ).
-
(- ). ,
(- ).
, ,
. , , ,
, ( ) ,
, . -. ( ) ( ).
.
. , ,
, : , . , , ,
- .
. . ,
[1, . 191].
, . .
, , .
,
,
.
.
,
,
. , , ,
, , .
, , , .
. . , , [1, . 193].
, , . ,
,
. , , . 58
I.
. , , , .
: -, ,
- ,
, XXI
, - .
,
,
, , , , , [6, . 3].
.
.
, ;
(,
, , );
.
( . informatio , ), , ,
( ,
. .); XX . ,
, , ; ; . -
: ,
, ; , ,
; , , ,
, [7, . 274].
, , . . ,
[2, . 23]. , ;
,
.
, ,
( - ).
: , , ,
59
, .
, , .
.
. . , . . , . . ,
. . , ,
( ), ( ) ( ). ,
, , , [8, . 284289].
,
-
[2; 8]. 2001 .,
[2, . 2026].
, , , , , - , ,
[2, . 23]. : , , ,
.
, ,
. , -, , . , . -,
, , . -, , .
,
. -,
, , , .
,
60
I.
. -,
, XXI (, - ).
, , , , .
1. , . . / . . . . : -
. .-. ., 2002. 592 .
2. , . . :
/ . . // . 2007. . 1.
. 2026.
3. , . . Hi-Tech: , :
. . - . / . . , 2007. 39 .
4. , . .
/ . . // . 2007. 1(18).
. 213221.
5. . : . . . . / . . . . . . 1. , 2002. 228 .
6. , . . / . . // . 2005. 2(13). . 36.
7. / . . . . . : -
. . , 1998. 896 .
8. , . . / . . // . 2004. 9. . 284288.
101.1 + 316
. . ()
, , . , ,
,
. , : ( )
( ). , , ,
( ).
124617, . , , 14 , . 1462, . 525.
E-mail: kalnej@zelnet.ru
61
- . ,
, , , .
: ,
, .
M. S. Kalnei (Moscow)
The understanding of social regularity is essential for the understanding of
the place of humans in the Universe. The transformations of the social system
set the question of the social trends estimation. In order to estimate the social
trends we need to understand the meaning of history. One of the main problems
is the problem of historicism. The historicist approach is often connected with
tyranny. On the other hand, considering the unity of history is essential for the
understanding the meaning of human being. Society needs to find a satisfactory
methodology of social prognosis. Such a methodology is essential for efficient
social engineering. Thus, the study of social and historical prognosis is essential
for the formation of intelligent mind. The author analyzes the principles of
historical prognosis.
Key words: social regularity, social and historical prognosis, social trends,
social system, historism, historicism, the sense of history, the unity of history,
methodology, social engineering.
, , , - . ( )
( , ) .
.
-
. . ,
, . , , , , . , - . ,
- .
, ,
. ,
, .
62
I.
. , .
, . , , ,
. , , , . , -
, [6, . 4244, 453].
, ? , . .
, , ,
, , [7, . 164165].
[ . . .]. , , , . ? , , ,
.
, , ,
. , , , , . , .
, , ? ,
,
. , , .
,
, .
, . , ,
,
, . ,
, .
, ,
, .
63
I.
:
XXI . . . . . -
: , , (
), .
:
, ,
, . ,
, .
,
, , , , .
, , ,
,
. , ,
, ,
,
, [5, . 1317].
, ,
, , ,
. ,
.
, - . ,
, , ,
.
- .
,
-
. . , , , ( , 65
, )
.
, ,
.
[2, . 124126]. , - . ,
:
. ,
, , .
, ,
, , . ,
,
. , - , , , .
, , . , , - . ,
,
. , - ,
,
, . , - ,
, , . -
. , - . ,
(, ) , ( ) - [3, . 12].
, .
, .
66
I.
, -
. , , , . - , , . .
,
, , , , . ,
, ,
, .
. . . ,
, , , .
(
. . . ). ,
[1, . 3].
(, )
, , , , , -
[3, . 9]. , (
) .
, .
, , .
- . , -
(, , . .).
, , .
,
, , . ,
. , , , ( 67
) ,
- ? , , ,
, , , . ,
- , , , -
, .
: ,
.
,
. , , , , ,
, . , . . , - .
, ,
, ,
, , , ,
.
:
, [5, . 2730, 137139]. , ,
, . ,
, .
, ,
. , , ,
.
1. , . . : / . . // . 2003. 4. . 321.
68
I.
2. , . : . . / . ; .
. . . . : , 2003. 256 .
3. , . . / . . .
. : , 1975. 151 .
4. , . . / . . // . 1999.
9 . 322.
5. , . . : I / . . ,
. . . : +, 2006. 448 .
6. , . : 2 . : . . / . .
: -, 2005. 800 .
7. , . / . // . . : , 1991. . 28288.
?
. . , . . , . . ()
. ,
,
.
: , , , , .
* 21.6
, ,
, - - .
630090, . , . , . 8, . 420.
-mail: maierbo@gmail.com
, , ,
, ,
, .
630090, . , . , . 8, . 420.
-mail: nnalivaiko@mail.ru
, ,
.
630090, . , . , . 8, . 411.
-mail: pokevi@mail.ru
69
POSTMODERNISM IN THE SYSTEM OF EDUCATION IS THE NEXT
STEP OF THE SOCIETY ADAPTATION?
[.: 14]
, , , .
, ,
, , , .
,
.
, , , ,
,
,
. ( ),
, , .
(
) , .
[5]. ,
. , , , . ,
70
I.
, .
,
, , ,
, , ,
. , () :
,
.
, . , ,
, .
, ,
, , ,
.
,
,
(
) .
,
, ,
, , .
. ,
,
, .
, 71
,
,
( , ) .
,
, , (
)
. , . . [6]. ,
, ( ) :
.
, ;
, . .;
: , , ,
(Entselbstung), , . . ,
<> , . , ,
, . -
, , , , , .
;
, : :
, , , : ,
;
: ,
.
(Angebotsschule), ;
:
, 72
I.
- , ,
, .
, . . - , - ;
, : , , , . :
- ...
,
.
, .
, ;
:
70- . , ,
, , .
, , ,
. ,
, ,
, , ( ) , ., , , ,
, , . , , ,
, ;
: ,
, , - . , ,
, .
- ;
,
; ,
, , , . ,
, , ,
, 73
, , ,
, ;
, :
. , , ,
, . , . . . .
, - ,
, ;
: , ,
. . , , ,
:
,
; , , ;
; , ,
, ;
;
;
: ,
, , , ,
, , ,
. , ,
, ,
- ;
: ,
. <> , , , . ,
, , , . , 74
I.
, , ;
;
:
. ,
, , ,
.
, , : ,
, ,
, .
:
,
.
,
, .
:
, . ,
.
,
, ,
:
,
, .
,
.
, ,
, , , , , ,
, .
. . ,
75
: . <>
XXI .,
, . . , . [7].
( ) ( ) ,
1990- .
.
1. , . . / . . , . . , . . // . : - , 2006. 2(16). . 244250.
2. , . . / . . ,
. . , . . // . 2006. .
1. . 244250.
3. , . . : / . . // . 2006. . 1. . 224230.
4. , . . : / . . , . . , . . // . 2007. 2(19) . 199202.
5. // http://
emdrone.livejournal.com/191695.html.
6. , . . / . . // . 2001. 34.
7. , . . / . . // .
2006. 2(16). . 311.
378 + 1
. . (), . . (-)
. , ,
. ,
. ,
.
, ,
76
I.
.
.
: , ,
, .
- () , . , ,
, . , ,
.
,
.
, . . ,
, , , .
630092, . , . . 20, . 6, . 407.
-mail: ignat@fgo.nstu.ru
, ( . -),
.
630092, . , . . 20, . 6, . 407.
-mail: firoz@narod.ru
77
. , . . , . , . . ,
, ,
, .
, , ,
, .
.
, ,
. , . ,
.
, , ( ), .
, , , ,
.
, ( , , , ). , ,
.
.
. ,
, ,
.
, , , ,
. , -, , . -, ,
( , , . .)
, . --
78
I.
, , , .
,
. ,
, , , .
, , .
,
.
, , , , , . , -
(
) . .
, , (), ,
, .
, , . ,
,
, - . ,
.
,
.
,
[1].
, ().
,
. , ,
. 79
, , , . , ,
, , ,
.
, , .
[2]
: , , . ,
. ,
. ,
. ,
,
, , .
, (
)
network society . .
:
;
.
,
.
, .
. ,
, ,
. (
)
, .
, ,
, , . -
80
I.
(
Microsoft, Cisco ).
.
, . ,
.
, . . -, ,
.
, , . , , , , .
mash-ups,
, .
, ,
, , , , , .
. , , -.
, , , .
( )
.
, , , , - - .
, .
, , ,
. , , . , .
, ,
, ,
81
. . , ,
,
.
. ,
( )
.
,
.
: ,
. , , , . ,
,
. . ,
, .
, , , , , , .
, , .
, , . . , ,
, , , , . ,
, , ,
. .
.
, , , , . , ,
.
82
I.
, : ( ), .
. , , , ,
, , .
.
,
,
.
, .
, ,
. . , , ,
,
, ( ,
, ,
, ).
. , , ,
. , , .
, ,
.
,
,
, .
. ,
. .
.
,
.
83
- .
,
, , . , .
.
. ,
, . , ,
, - .
, ( ). , - , -
.
. , , , ,
, . ,
.
,
.
. , - , -
.
, .
,
, . ,
, ,
, . , , , : , ,
,
, .
84
I.
1. , . : , / . . : -, 2004.
2. , . : , / . . . : , 2000.
3. , . . :
: / . . // . . 7 // http://
www.irex.ru/press/pub/polemika/07/ast.
4. , . : / . // http://ncdo.levsha.ru/Pub/036D.htm.
5. , . . : / . . // http://www.lihachev.ru/chten/2006god/dokladi/
sektsiya1/gogol.
6. , . . : / . ., . . // http://ido.tsu.ru/ss ?unit=222&page
=contents.
7. , . . / . . , . . // . . IX . . . - RELARN. : - ,
2002.
8. , / XXI :
. . Microsoft. 2004. . 26. .
9. , . . :
. / . . // . .-. . : 2 . : ,. 2006. . 1. . 377382.
10. , . . . / . . //
. .-. . : 2 . : . 2006. . 1.
. 373377.
85
II
. . ()
. , ,
, . , , , . , ,
, , .
: , , .
. . Samoilov (Samara)
The aim of this paper is to substantiate, from the philosophical point of view,
the conception of the competence oriented education alternative to the traditional
education in the information-oriented society. Considering the pedagogy as an
applied philosophy, the author shows that the information-oriented age of modern
civilization must have its own educational system with ethics in its kernel.
, ,
,
.
443090, , . -, 26, . 211.
-mail: evge-samojlov@yandex.ru
86
II.
Sustainable development of modern society is connected with the upbringing of
the human being of high moral standards, independent, responsible; the human
capable of transforming the world according to the universal values. The paper
reveals the essence of such concepts as competence and skills. There is proposed
a model of persons competence in the information-oriented society which is
built according to the idea of anthropocentrism and the universal system-wide
regularities.
Key words: competence, skills, competence oriented education.
. , , - . ,
, , , . , .
-
()
.
, .
,
, , ,
, .
. . . ,
[1]. , , , . , , , , , .
, , , ,
, , .
. . . , -,
87
, .
.
,
, , , . .
, , , ,
, (
, ). , , .
, , . . [. : 2, . 54]. , , , ,
. , ,
, . , .
XX . -
, , , , .
, ,
. ,
. . , , . , [2, . 54].
, !
, , ,
, . ,
, . ,
.
, , . ,
, , , -
. 88
II.
, , [3, . 14].
, , (),
. , ,
, .
- . , , ( ).
, ,
- ,
, , , , ,
. .
. , , .
,
, , , , , , , ,
. , . , ,
, , , , , , [46].
. ,
,
, ,
. ,
, .
: . 89
, , . , [7].
,
, .
, , .
, :
,
, ; ;
,
;
,
;
,
;
,
, ;
; , , ( , ).
,
: , , . ,
(1112 ),
. -, , ,
. , , ()
() . , ,
90
II.
.
, ,
[8]. , () , .
: 1) , 2) - , 3) (, , ), 4) .
, ,
. , , . - , , .
, , ,
.
, () , .
. ,
, , , ,
, , ,
,
.
,
, .
(, , ),
, .
, , ,
,
.
, ,
.
, , .
.
91
. , , () , , , , .
,
:
. [9].
, , :
1) () ;
2) , , ; , ;
3) , ,
;
4) .
. . .
, , , . , , , [10].
1. , . . . /
. . . . : -, 1995. 448 .
2. , . . / . . //
- . . : , 1993.
3. 2100. / . . . . . . : ,
2000. 208 .
4. , . : . . / . , . .
. : , 2001.
5. , . : .
. / . , . . . : , 2004.
6. , . . /
. . // . . . . 1999. 1. . 5576.
7. , . . : , , / . . ,
. . // : .
VII . . : . . , 2005. . 227232.
92
II.
8. , . . : , : . / . . . : - . . . -, 2006. 160 .
9. , . . /
. . . . : , 2000.
10. , . . : / . . . / : , 1996. 512 .
159 + 923
?
. . ()
.
- . -
, .
- , ,
- .
: , , , , , , , , , , - .
WHAT IS COMPETENCE?
T. G. Bogachyova (Novosibirsk)
The main purpose of the article is to analyze the scientific work by foreign
researchers dealing with the problem of definition of the notion of competence.
The article considers the problem of definition of the notion of competence from
the psychological viewpoint. The author tries to analyze and summarize the
viewpoints of various foreign authors concerning this aspect and the issue of
practical possibility of using the competence diagnostics in the scientific research
activity. The variety of approaches to the diagnostics and measurement of
, , .
630039, . , . , . 155, . 408.
-mail: tatiana.bogacheva@gmail.com
93
competence is determined by the theoretical and empirical basis of the modern
natural science paradigm, where competence is described as a premise for selforganized activity. On the basis of European experience of practical and applied
usage of the competence diagnostics techniques, we can conclude that competences
are a decisive factor in the professional and personal spheres.
Key words: ability, self-organization, qualification, skill, activity
competence, personality, social-communication competence.
,
. , ,
,
, .
, ,
. ,
,
.
(, ) ,
.
-, .
.
, , .
, .
.
competentia competere,
, . competens , , , . XIII . competentia
- .
competentia Heinrich Zedlers (1753)
, , .
, , . ,
, , , ,
[1].
94
II.
.
, . .
,
.
J. Weinberg , ,
.
, ,
,
, J. Erpenbeck. , , .
J. Weinberg , ,
[. : 1].
R. W. White .
, ,
,
. ,
R. W. White, ( , ), [4].
.
- . . , H. Gapski, , W. Jetter ,
F. Bazer 1995 .
. ,
(N. Thom R. Zaugg) (G. Nourth).
(A. Kalpaka).
, , [. : 1].
, .
, , , ,
, .
.
, , (, )
, .
95
, , , .
, - ,
,
, , ,
, . , , .
, , . ,
.
,
.
, .
, ,
, .
, , . ,
.
, .
, . ,
, ,
.
E. Staudt B. Kriegesmann
,
, [3].
,
, .
,
.
.
, . .
96
II.
, ,
(, ) , . J. Erpenbeck V. Heyse, . J. Erpenbeck V. Heyse , [2].
.
,
.
, ,
. , , , , ,
. ( ) , ,
, , . ., ,
.
: , , ?
D. McCelland. , , . , , , , . . , ,
, ( ) . .
, ;
,
[2].
?
, . , .
,
. ,
97
, ,
. . . ,
,
. , .
- , . ? , . , , . , , .
,
.
( ) . .
, .
, ,
, .
, , : ;
; , ;
. . XIX . - , , , .
19701980- . , . ,
, , , . . , . : , , - .
, , , , , , , , , 98
II.
, , , . - , , , , , , , : ,
. .
, , .
(, ,
, , )
(, , -, -
). -
. . ,
, . : ,
.
, . T. Wins , , , ;
, [2].
,
, , .
.
.
, . , , , , .
. , .
,
. ( ), ( ), 99
(- ) (- ).
, , , , .
( ), ( ). , , . (),
(, ); (, );
() (, )
(, ).
, ,
, ( ), . :
( );
( );
- (
);
- ( , ).
, , .
1. Erpenbeck, J. Handbuch Kompetenzmessung. Erkennen, verstehen und bewerten
von Kompetenzen in der betrieblichen, pdagogischen und psychologischen Praxis /
J. Erpenbeck, L. Rosenstiel. Stuttgart : Schffer Poeschel, 2004.
2. Erpenbeck, J. Die Kompetenzbiographie. Strategien der Kompetenzentwicklung durch
selbstorganisiertes Lernen und multimediale Kommunikation / J. Erpenbeck,
V. Heyse. Muenster : Waxmann Verlag GmbH, 1999.
3. Staudt, E. Wissenschaft ignoriert Mittelstand und Handwerk Fachleute nicht mehr
verfgbar / E. Staudt, B. Kriegesmann, M. Kottmann // Know-How. 19992000.
. 4 (Dez. Jan.). S. 410.
4. White, R. W. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence / R. W. White //
Psychological Review. 1959. H. 66. S. 297333.
100
II.
378
. . ()
- . , , , ;
. . , .
: , , , - .
V. M. Onishik (Kemerovo)
Articles goal: to actualize students problem of developing the communicative
competence in conditions of specially organized cultural-educational space of
higher education. There is a tradition of studying of communicative competence
in domestic social psychology proceeding from three parties of dialogue:
communication, perception and interaction. The author suggests viewing
communicative competence, proceeding from interrelation of language, culture
and mentality. Such actual approach is connected with a problem of integrity of
consciousness of the person in the conditions of fragmentary world.
Key words: competent paradigm, communicative competence, a concept
sphere, cultural-educational space of higher.
, , , , .
, , , , ,
.
650029, . , . , . 19, . 509.
E-mail: Onishhik@yandex.ru
101
, . - .
, ,
, : , , , . : , , -,
.
, , .
, -, , , , , .
- - .
, . . . : , ,
, , , ,
( ), ,
, , , (, ) [4].
. . , ( ) , .
. .
, - ,
, , , , , [2, . 14].
-, - . , , , [2, . 1456].
- , , , . , .
102
II.
(. . , . . , . . .). , . - (. . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . . , . . ,
J. S. Bruner, A.W. Combs, M. L. Hoffman .).
. (. . , . . -, . . ,
. . .),
(, .). , , . .
, . , ,
, .
. . ,
. . , . . , . . ; .; : ,
.
, [7, . 373].
, , , ,
, .
:
, , .
XX . (. , . , . , . .), - XX . (. , . , . , . .). , . .
, .
. . , . . , . .
. ,
,
; , [3, . 34]. 103
, : , ,
() , .
, [3, . 11].
. . ,
, , [5, . 439]. : -, .
,
(. . ). , . . ,
(
, . .). ,
, , . , . . ,
. , , , ,
,
[5, . 440].
. , , - [9]. ,
.
. . , , - [1]. , , ,
(. . ). .
, , . , , , (. , . . , . ,
. , . . , . . , . . .). .
,
(. . )
104
II.
, . , . .
() . (. . ). , : , , , .
, .
, .
. ,
.
(, ,
, , .); . .
, ,
, . , , . , , ,
, , , , , . ( , ). , , , [6].
. , . -,
. , , . , , ,
. . , , , , .
, . , ,
. , 105
, , [8].
(, , , , ) ,
, , .
. . .
,
, .
,
.
, .
, , .
. , ,
. . . . . . -
.
111 , , ,
, , , [10]. .
, - (
).
, .
, ,
. , ,
-
106
II.
[10]. .
, ,
. .
, . .
,
.
- , , .
,
. , , ,
- ,
.
1. , . . : . / . . . . : , 1996. 376 .
2. , . . - : - : . . . : 19.00.01 / . . . : -,
2003. 176 .
3. , . . / . . , . . , . . . . : - , 1990. 104 .
4. , . .
/ . . // . . . . :
. . . -, 2002. . 4. . 3842.
5. , . . / . . ; . . .
. . // . . : , 2000. . 438453.
6. , . . / . . , . . ; . . . . //
: . . : , 2000. . 616.
7. : . / . . . ; . . . . . 2- .,
. . . : : , 2004. 752 .
8. , . . -
/ . . // . . : ,
1998. . 4766.
9. , . .-
/ . . , . . , . . . . : - -
, 2002. 490 .
10. : / . . . . .
: , 1992. 96 .
107
371 + 13
. . ()
, . , .
. .
.
.
.
: , , , , , , .
G. M. Seryogin (Novosibirsk)
In the article, some ways of increasing the learning efficiency aimed at solution
of the problem of conscious mastering of educational material are considered.
An important element of reflective activity of pupils is the skill of putting questions
in order to learn as well as to specify or complement the knowledge. Solution of
the problem of understanding of the mathematical text is also connected with
this skill of raising questions. The substantiation of truthfulness or falseness of
statements and conclusions is, to the greatest degree, connected with deepening
of understanding. Inclusion of the reflective problems into the educational activity
also promotes conscious and deep mastering of the mathematical material. In
the article, a great attention is paid to the questions of visualization. One of the
effective ways of deepening the understanding of educational material is the
distinguishing of the semantic cornerstones in the mathematical text and the
usage of basic signals.
Key words: understanding, conscious mastering, raising questions,
substantiation of truthfulness, reflective problems, visualization, basic signals.
, , .
630126, . , . , 28.
E-mail: Has@nspu.ru
108
II.
. ,
.
. , . ,
, , ,
. , . . ,
,
, .
. (
?). ( ,
?) ( , , ?).
. . : , . . : ,
: ) ?
) ?.
, .
. , ,
, , , . , (
), , , .
, ,
. , , ,
, . -, . -, ,
, ,
-
109
. .
, ,
. ,
.
() ,
, .
- ,
, ,
, , .
.
. . ,
.
,
-
.
, , . , ,
, , .
.
,
. ,
.
,
.
; , : ? . . ,
. , , . ,
110
II.
, . . , ,
,
.
,
. ,
. , .
.
. , . .
.
,
. ,
, . , .
, ,
, .
, , . . . , , : )
; )
; ) ; ) , .
, . ,
. ,
. , , ,
,
. . , . , ,
.
.
111
. , , , .
, .
. . , .
- -.
, .
- . , .
- - . , - .
,
. ,
-, , -, . ,
,
. . . ,
[3].
.
, , ( , ,
, )
. , , , . . .
. . . . , .
( ) , .
, . , , .
, , . . 112
II.
,
( -),
[7, . 4].
. . [2] , . , ; , , ,
, . . : , . . . ,
, .
, .
,
.
. . . ,
, . . . . [4],
, ,
. ,
,
, , , ,
, .
. . ,
, .
.
,
, 3 8, 32, 38, 137.
, , , -. . . ,
, : , -
113
, () ( )
, ,
[5]. . . . . . . . .
,
. . . , . . , . . , . . ,
. . .,
.
,
. ,
, . . , ,
. ,
.
, .
:
, . . ?
,
. , , , , . ,
,
, . , . , . . [6], , . ,
, , .
( ),
. ,
, , . , , .
. . , . : , ,
114
II.
, [. : 1, . 58].
. .
, , ,
, , , ,
.
1. , . . / . . // . . : , 1976.
2. , . . : . / . . . : - , 1997. 149 .
3. , . . / . . . . : , 1996. 479 .
4. , . .
. . ? / . . // . 1987. 2. . 7180.
5. , . .
: - / . . .
. : , 1964. 219 .
6. , . . : / . . ; , . , . . . : , 1975. 255 .
7. , . . / . . . : , 1997. 85 .
378+13
:
. . ()
,
,
, .
. .
: , , .
, , .
630126, . , . , 28.
E-mail: ftip@nspu.net, dmkruglov@yndex.ru
115
THE MANAGEMENT OF THE EDUCATION QUALITY:
THE PEDAGOGICAL MONITORING
N. R. Kruglova (Novosibirsk)
With the introduction of the system of quality management in the universities
based on the principles of universal quality management, it became necessary
to use the technologies that are closely monitoring the process of forming the
future specialists. One of such technologies is pedagogical monitoring of the
specialist training quality. Various approaches to control and evaluation of the
higher education results during various historic periods are considered in the
article.
Key words: quality of higher education, quality management technology,
pedagogical monitoring of quality.
, , ,
[7, . 23]. , . : , , , ,
.
,
.
1998 ., ; , [3, . 11].
2003 . , ,
, (, , , ,
), .
, , (, , ,
. .).
:
, , , ;
;
, [2, . 21].
116
II.
-,
,
, . , , , ,
.
, ,
.
, , . . , . . , . . ,
. . , ,
[5].
( . . ) : ,
, , , ( ) [1]. , , .
195060- . ,
, . - [5, . 15].
197080- . .
: , , , , [4, . 78].
, 1974 ., ,
, , , ,
(),
, , [5, . 21]. . . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , , ,
, , , . 117
,
. - . , , , ,
.
1993 . (
. . , . . , . . .).
() (). , .
. . , . . , . . ,
. . .
,
, .
(), 9000.
9000 1987 . . . ,
2000 . . . , , ,
,
[6, . 50]. , , : , , , , ,
, , ,
.
(TQM), . , PDCA (plan do check action)
. , , ,
, . ,
. 9001-2001, 118
II.
, , , .
( ). ,
,
, ,
[8, . 67]. , , - ,
.
(. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . ).
.
- :
, , .
,
, , .
.
1. , . . / . . .
. : . . , 1961. 618 .
2. , /
. . , . . ; . . . // :
, , : VII .-. .
(1920 . 2004 .). : - . . - . , 2005. 264 .
3. , . . : . /
. . , . . . . : : , 2007. 192 .
4.
(1618 . 1973 .) . : . ., 1973.
119
5. , . .
: . / . . . :
. . - , 1998. 150 .
6. : . / . . . . : , 2002. 174 .
7. , . . . . 4 / . . . ., 1991.
8. : -
/ . . . . . : . - ,
2000. 448 .
378.02 + 51
. . ()
, : ,
,
, ,
, .
: , , , , , , .
M. E. Fedotova (Yakutsk)
In the article, various approaches to the problem of studying different levels
of mastering of knowledge are considered, the main interpretations of the
following concepts are analyzed in detail: the levels of educational activity, the
levels of intellectual activity of pupils, the levels of cognitive activity of pupils,
self-management of educational activity, the levels of cognitive independence,
the levels of mastering of knowledge and skills.
Key words: teaching, level, knowledge acquiring, evaluation of the results,
basic level, intermediate level, advanced level.
. , ,
.
677000, . , . , . 12, . 47.
E-mail: mil_imi@mail.ru
120
II.
:
, , , . , , .
III- .
. ,
. .
. . :
I- , ; II- , ; III- , , [6, . 43].
, . . : 1) ,
, , ,
; 2) , ;
3) ,
; 4)
[7].
. . () , :
I- () , , .
, , , , .
II- , , . .
III- (, ,
, ) .
IV- , .
V- , ,
- . .
VI- , ,
[9].
- , . .
[11] ,
122
II.
: ; ; , ; .
, , , .
:
; ;
;
;
.
:
; ;
; ;
,
.
:
; , ;
,
;
, ; .
: ;
; ; ; .
. . ,
,
. ,
. , () , .
() . () , ( ) .
() , [2].
. . : ( ), - ( ), -
( ).
[3].
. .
. 123
, , ; ,
( )
; ,
, , [10, . 7].
, . . : , . , . ,
, .
()
(
).
() [12, . 25].
. . .
, ; ,
, , ,
, , ( ).
,
[13, . 40]. ;
,
. ,
,
,
. . ,
, , [13, . 40]. ; : , , ( ) ,
, , , .
.
, 124
II.
[13, . 4041].
. . ,
, , ,
: , [4, . 7].
: ,
. . : ,
, , , , ,
.
,
. . : , , , , . , , [5].
, , , ,
.
. . : ,
[12, . 1].
: ( , , ), (), . , ;
. ,
; .
; .
1. , . . / . . .
: - . -, 1977. 304 .
2. , . . : /
. . // . 1999. 5. . 1625.
3. , . . : . . . . / . . , 1996. 18 .
4. , . . ( ) :
. . . . / . . , 1998. 17 .
5. , . . /
. . // (. . ). 1999. 38.
. 37.
125
6. , . .
/ . . // . 1973. 8 (XXI). . 4345.
7. , . .
/ . . . : - . . -, 1982. 224 .
8. , . .
/ . . // .
1974. 10 (XXIII). .1315.
9. , . . / . . . . : ,
1981. 96 .
10. , . . : . . . . / . . , 1996. 39 .
11. . .
/ . . ; . . . ,
. . // : . . . . : - , 1987. . 7888.
12. , . . : .
. - . / . . ., 1998. 37 .
13. , . .
: . . . / . . , 2000.
188 .
378+13
:
. . , . . ()
.
. .
: , , .
, ,
,
.
630126, . , . , 28.
E-mail: krash@nspu.net
, , .
630126, . , . , 28.
E-mail: ftip@nspu.net, dmkruglov@yndex.ru
126
II.
, , .
, -
,
. XXI .
, .
2003 . , 2010 . - . :
.
, ,
: , ,
,
( ). , . , ( ) .
:
,
, , .
, , , , , , , , .
, . , ,
. -
127
, .
: ,
,
, ;
; ,
[1, . 21]. , , (. . ).
,
. . . , ,
, .
, ,
, .
, , , ,
. ,
,
, ,
.
, , .
(. -), (. ),
(-, . ).
: , , , - . .
.
- .
,
. , 128
II.
. , .
,
, .
() , , .
, 9000:2001.
, ,
, , .
,
,
, . , : , , ,
, , , ,
,
. ,
: , ,
, , , , , .
,
,
. 9001
2001 , . , , , . , .
, V
, 2005 ., : 30 % 4 3, 70 %
. : , , , 129
, .
, , - ,
, . 71 %
, 38 %
.
. :
, ,
, .
?
100 % , , 50 % ,
( ), 23 % , 27 % ,
.
, , 69 %
, ,
, , .
.
26 %
.
, , : 24 % ,
, 30 % , - , 26 % 20 % . ,
.
2006 .
( ) .
. : 23 %
; 68 % ( , - , , , , ).
; 6 % , ,
; 3 % , .
,
,
, .
:
- 130
II.
,
, , - ( ). ,
.
,
. , .
1. , . . , / . . , . . ; . . . // : , , : VII- .-.
. (1920 . 2004 .). : - . . - . , 2005. 264 .
2. , . . : / . . , . . ,
. . ; . . . . . : - , 2006. 72 .
3. : - / . . . . . : . - , 2000. 448 .
4. , . .
/ . . ; . . .-. . - // . : - , 2003. . 3.
13 + 65
. . ()
,
.
, , .
630126, . , . , 28.
-mail: alek@svs-6.ru
131
,
, , -.
: ,
, , , .
,
XX .
(18421924) ,
, , , .
1930- ., . ( ). , , . XX . ,
, , . ,
. . , . .
.
.
, , , , . .
1920- . : , . , . , . ,
, , .
132
II.
. 1922 . ,
, , -,
. , , ,
, .
,
. -, . -, ,
,
. -, .
, .
.
, . . , . , . ,
, . , , , [1].
,
. ,
, . , , balanced
skorekard ( ), 1990- .
.
: . ,
.
. , .
.
, .
, . :
;
133
,
;
;
, ;
,
.
:
-,
,
, , ,
- ;
,
, ;
,
. , ,
.
, .
,
, , .
, , ,
, . , , ,
, , , .
, .
, , . , .
.
(). ( ) .
134
II.
:
;
;
-;
.
()
[3].
().
, , ,
.
,
.
, : ; ; ,
, .
.
. ( )
(- ). . ,
, . .
, . ,
:
;
;
.
1 ,
. , , .
. , ,
, :
;
;
135
(, , , . .);
;
(, , );
( );
;
, . .
.
, . .
,
, . , , , ( ).
.
.
.
( ) . , , . . , .
,
, .
, .
, ,
,
. (
) .
, ( ), , ,
. ,
.
, ,
136
II.
, . . . , , , .
, , ,
. ; , ,
.
, . ,
, .
. -, , . -, .
-, ,
.
. , , ,
.
,
. ,
. , , , .
. ()
, , . .
. ,
, .
.
, , . .
,
.
. , ,
.
137
:
;
;
;
.
,
, .
: , . . , , ,
. .
.
, , ,
. , , .
.
. .
,
. ,
, , .
( ).
, .
, , , . .
.
.
( ).
.
, 138
II.
, , ,
.
. ,
. : ; ;
, .
, :
, , , .
( ) , , .
.
, ,
, . ,
.
, .
.
, .
. , .
, , , -, ,
.
1. , . ; / . , . . . : , 2002.
2. XXI . : . . / . . . . : , 2002.
3. , . . :
. . / . , . . . : -, 2003.
4. , . . : .
. / . . . . : , 2005.
139
371.162 + 01.031.4(100)
( )
. . ()
. ,
XX XXI . .
: - ,
, ,
, .
N. . ganesyants (Vladikavkaz)
The article analyzes the transformation of the definition of functional literacy
as the development of the continuous education skills in the contemporary
research in the West. The author focuses on the social context, philosophical and
pedagogical aspects and technological foundations of interpreting the functional
literacy of the information society based on the example of educational policy in
the U.S in the second half of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. The
outcome of the research is represented as a technological construct of the
functional literacy.
Key words: information and communication technologies, functional
literacy, technological literacy, learning skills, continuous education.
,
(R. Lanham, M. Tuman, P. Gilster, J. Bolter, G. Hawisher, C. Selfe, G. Kress).
, .
, ,
- .
362039, . , , . , . 63/2,
. 136.
-mail: oganat@mail.ru
140
II.
. .
, .
,
.
, [1, . 39].
20032012: ,
, <> , .
. , , , , ,
. [2, . 20].
.
, , .
, , , [3, . 85].
, .
. ,
, , [3, . 154].
,
, ,
, . , , ,
.
. . , , 141
, , [4, . 27].
, XIX .
,
.
. , XX .,
,
, ,
[5, . 65].
1970- .
. ( ).
,
.
, , , , [1, . 41].
.
, .
(Nation Literacy Act, 1991)
XXI . :
, , [1, . 30].
1980- . , .
: , , ,
[6, . 1]. : , .
142
II.
[6, pt. 2, . 2].
,
.
, , ,
[6, . 3].
,
. . .
., . .
.
2002 .
XXI . (Partnership for 21st Century Skills),
, Apple, Dell Microsoft, ,
, . XXI ,
,
, XXI .
-
() . - . XXI . ,
- .
-
[7, . 11].
2007 .
(International society for technology in education)
(National educational technology standards for students),
1998 . ,
.
:
143
1. . ,
.
2. . ,
,
.
3. - . - , .
4. ,
. , ,
, .
5. . ,
, , .
6. . , [8].
, . ,
, .
1. Adult literacy and new technologies: Tools for a lifetime. U.S. Congress, Office of
technology assessment, 1993 // www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal recordDetail?
accno=ED361473.
2. 20032012 //
www.un.org/russian/events/literacy/literacy.htm.
3. Tuman, M. A. Preface to literacy: An inquiry into pedagogy practice and progress /
M. Tuman. Alabama : The Univ. of Alabama Press, 1987.
4. Faucault, M. Discipline and punish: The birth of prison / M. Faucault. New York :
Vintage Books, 1979.
5. Deleuze, G. Negotiations / G. Deleuze. New York : Columbia Univ. Press, 1995.
6. Getting Americas students ready for the 21st century: Meeting the technology literacy
challenge. A report to the nation on technology and education reform, 1996 //
www.ed.gov.about/offices/list/os/technology/plan/national/index.
7. Learning for the 21st century, Partnership for 21 st entury skills, 2003 //
www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/P21_pollreport_singlepg.pdf.
8. National educational technology standards for students, ISTE, 2007 // www.iste.org/
inhouse/nets/cnets/students/pdf/NETS_for_Students_2007.pdf.
144
II.
37.011.33
*
. . ()
. . . ,
.
: , , , .
B. O. Maier (Novosibirsk)
There is analyzed G. Batesons approach to formalization of the double bind
situation during communication between individuals on the basis of the theory
of logic types and logic levels of communication. Generalization of this approach
to the case of communication between social groups and social institutes is
suggested. It is substantiated that the analysis of the double bind situation in
the society has a paramount importance for revealing the adapting function of
modern education.
Key words: patterns, logical level of communication, double bind,
adaptation.
[1] .
. ,
* 21.6.
, ,
, - - .
630090, . , . , . 8, . 420.
-mail: maierbo@gmail.com
145
, ,
, , .
: ) [2]; )
[3]; ) ,
[4]; ) [5], [6].
,
,
, double bind , .
, , , , . [7]. , XX . ,
, .
, , , ,
; , ,
[8], .
( ). , , 2007 .
Kybernetes,
. ,
,
[9]. ,
, [7],
[10].
, , :
( , ) ;
,
,
[11, . 158]. 146
II.
,
;
, , ,
. , , .
/ ;
. , -
.
, ,
. (DB ), double bind (DB ).
. :
(, ) . , , , , , . ., ,
. ,
<>. , , .
, <>
. ,
[7, . 191].
, ,
( ,
.) ( ) , . , ,
, , . , (,
), , ( , .), , .
, 147
, () . , , ,
,
.
, 1980- - 1990- .
, .
. , . .
, . . :
, . <>.
(discontinuity)
. ,
, , , , , [7, . 149]. ,
() , , , . ,
: () () ,
( ) , () ?
.
. , , , , ,
. : 1. . 2. . 3.
. 4. , . 5. , <>.
, , [12]. , . , , , ( ) . ,
148
II.
: )
; ) ;
)
; )
.
A. M. , . : . . , ,
. , , , . , ,
, , , ,
; ;
,
; [8].
, : 1) , , ; 2)
, ; 3)
, , ,
; 4)
. , ( ) ,
; 5)
; 6) , .
, ; 7) , , , .;
8) ( )
; 9)
; 10) , , , ,
,
149
, , .; 11) , , ,
, , ,
.
, , . , , ( )
, ( ). , , ( ) :
, , ,
, .
, , , 1980- - 1990- .
,
, , , , , , ,
.
, , XXI . . , : <>
[. . . .] , ; ,
<>, , ,
, <>.
. ,
, ,
. ,
, , <>.
, [13].
150
II.
,
, , , . ,
, , , . . : , ,
,
. .
(1) ,
, ,
, .
(2) ,
, .
(3) , ,
, [7, . 152].
, : 1. .
<>.
2. . , <>. 3.
. :
(a) - -, (b)
- -, .
, , , , , . <>.
3. , , , , . , , . -,
<> . ,
, , , . -, . , , . : , , ,
, ,
, . ( ) . . ,
<>. 5.
, . , ,
, <>. , -, 151
, , , . . 6. ,
, <> . , <>. [7, . 151].
(double bind),
. , : double
bind ( , ) ,
,
. :
[14].
, ,
, ( ,
, .),
.
, ,
, .
(double
bind). . : . , ,
, , , ,
. . [15]. , ,
double
bind.
, ,
Cllins, double, , , , ,
[15].
: deceitful ; dishonest , . , : doubling , , ; double-dealer
, ; double-faced . , double ,
, .
to bind. : compel
, ; confine , ; engage , ; fasten , ; restrict . ,
to get into a bind to be in a bind,
, .
152
II.
153
,
.
1. , . .
/ . . // . 2006. 2 (16). . 284291.
2. , . . / . . // . 2007. 3 (20). . 6775.
3. , . . / . . ,
. . , . . // . 2006. . .
1. . 305315.
4. , . . : / . . // . 2006. . . 1. . 224230.
5. , . . : / . . , . . // . 2006. 3 (17). . 6370.
6. , . . / . . , . . , . . // . 2006. 2 (16). . 244250.
7. , . : ,
: . . / . . . : , 2000. 476 .
8. , A. M. / . . // .
. , . . :
, 2000. 476 .
9. Kybernetes (Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited). 2007. Vol. 36.
7/8. // http://www.emeraldinsight.com.
10. , . . : . . / . .
. : , 2007. 248 .
11. , . / . ,
. // : , ,
. . : , 1996. 400 .
12. , . / . // :
. . : , 2003. . 451452.
13. , . / . // . .
, . . : , 2000. 476 .
14. , . . / . . , . . // .
. , . . : , 2000. 476 .
15. , . . / . , . . // http://
ihtik.lib.ru.
16. , . . Double bind / . . // http://metanymous.livejournal.com/
46700.html.
154
II.
813 + 37.0
. . ()
, -.
, , .
, , ( , ,
, ). , , - .
: , , , , , , , .
A. V. Koreneva (Murmansk)
In this article the author is considering integration as one of the conditions
for professionally-oriented Russian Language and Language Culture University
course, aimed at nonphilologists. The author offers the model of the course
integration with general and specialized subjects, determines its role in
educational process and describes the criteria for integrated subjects selection.
The forms, methods and ways of integrating the subjects are described (i. e.
integrated classes, talks on integrated topics, professionally oriented language
material usage, professional course books analysis). The author proves that
application of the integration principle increases the motivation of students for
studying Russian Language and Language Culture and helps to form their
professional communicative competence.
Key words: professionally oriented education, integration, interdisciplinary integration, integrative model, interdisciplinary links, integrated class,
professionally oriented texts.
, , ,
.
183031, . , . , . 4/1, . 58.
-mail: shishloeg@mstu.edu.ru.
155
,
. , , ,
, . -,
, ,
. -,
, - . ,
, , . -,
, ,
,
, .
,
. ( , ) ( ,
).
.
, , , , ,
. ,
, :
, ,
, [2]. , ()
, ,
, ,
, , [1, . 9].
: , , ,
, . ,
- [1, . 11].
,
.
( , 156
II.
). ( ):
;
;
() , ( );
, , ;
;
;
.
, : ( ) (
).
, , -
. . ,
,
.
, . , ,
, <>
[3, . 74].
, .
-.
, , ,
.
, , ,
.
, ,
, , , .
,
,
() ,
. . , , ,
157
( ). ,
, , , , . . , .
. , , :, ()
, ; , () .
, , .
,
,
, (, , , . .) , (, ) .
, ,
. , , , . ,
, .
, . , , , ,
( ) .
. , ,
, .
, . ,
. , , , , -
158
II.
. .,
.
, ,
, ,
, ,
. ,
( ) ,
, . ,
( , , ).
, , ,
: .
, , , , .
, -
( - ),
, . , , ,
. ,
, , ,
, , . ,
, ,
, . :
, , .
( ) , , /
, ( , )
, , .
, ,
. , ( ).
,
,
(
III , )
159
. (,
,
). , , : ,
.
, . .
, I ( )
,
.
, . , , , ,
(, , , , ).
, , .
,
.
-. :
, , ( );
( );
, , .
. , .
, ,
. . . ,
: :
, ,
,
160
II.
. , ,
, - ,
, , . , .
( , , , ).
, , .
,
.
.
, . , .
.
. ,
- .
1. , . . : . . . . / . . , 2004.
2. . ., 1988.
3. , . . / . . // . 1 (18). 2007.
37.01
. . ()
- .
161
- , , , , , . ( ). , , , ,
, - , .
: , , , , , , , , , .
METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS
OF THE SENSE-ORIENTED EDUCATION
E. G. Belyakova (Tuymen)
The essence of education, as a part of upbringing of the sensible culturalhistorical person, cannot be fully realized within the traditional context of
cognitive-oriented school. There is described in the article a complex of mutually
coordinated and mutually complementary methodologies including various
approaches of cultural studies, axiology, anthropology, psychology, and
hermeneutics. Using this basis, a sense-oriented educational model can be built
up. There are shown by the author the possibilities of an absolutely novel
interpretation of knowledge assimilation as a fully cultural, personal, and
development oriented process, using the resources of the Understanding
category. The author suggests quite a novel approach to determination of different
values, goals, principles, contents, ways, and methods of the educational process
as an alternative to the cognitive-oriented methods. This new way leads to
formation of sense and values of the person and ensures formation of the manof-culture.
Key words: understanding, sense, culture, person, cultural studies, axiology,
anthropology, hermeneutics, psychology, sense-oriented education.
,
,
,
.
, , ,
- , .
625003, , ., 10.
E-mail: B-Evgenia@yandex.ru
162
II.
,
. , , - ,
, .
, - , , , , - ,
( . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . . ,
. . .), .
- - ,
, , , , , . , ,
.
, , , , , .
,
.
. . . ,
,
, [7]. ,
, .
,
, . . . , 163
, [1]. , , - , ,
.
, ,
, ,
(. ). ( , ). .
- ,
, , ,
[2].
, ,
,
, ,
, . . . ,
,
[6].
, , . ,
.
, [3].
. ,
, , -, -.
,
,
. . . ,
, 164
II.
[4]. , ,
, , , .
, . ,
(. , . . , . ,
. . , . ). , , , . , , .
,
(, , . .), . ( ), ,
.
, , , , , .
, , , . , ,
,
.
(. . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . .).
() . () , . ,
- , .
. . . , ,
, -
165
- , [5].
, , , ,
.
, - , ,
, . , , .
, , - - , , .
, . , , , -
,
. ,
,
- .
, - (, , ).
, .
,
- ,
, , ,
.
. , 166
II.
.
,
( , , , ).
- , ,
, .
-
, ,
, - .
, .
1. , . . /
. . // . 1997. 3. . 1520.
2. , . . : , /
. . // . 2002. 3. . 37.
3. , . . XXI / . . .
. : , 1998. 605 .
4. , . . : / . . . : : . -, 1998. 312 .
5. , . . : ,
/ . . . . : , 1999. 487 .
6. , . . . / . . . . : , 2003. 271 .
7. , . . : /
. . // . 2002. 1. . 7187.
167
III
Part III. PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION IN WESTERN
AND EASTERN TRADITIONS
80 + 81 + 13
:
. , . (, )
, , , (), ,
.
LT-44221, Kaunas, Sporto, g. 6. . , . , . 6.
E-mail: s.laskiene@lkka.lt
168
III.
. , .
, . , ,
.
(
) , , . ,
, .
: , , , , , ().
169
perceived is, at the same time, a text (or there is nothing outside the text,
p. 158, J. Derrida, 1976). The text is much more than what could be written on
the paper. In Derridas opinion, every system of meanings might be understood,
interpreted, and read as a text, because it is the signs that are making the
systems of meaning; and, as a consequence, the perception of reality becomes
possible. The written signs form texts. Virtues, capacities, and characteristics
are a small part of things that compose the Self. Personalities form organizations.
Every action has a meaning which is much more than a scheme of various
signs. This might be said about all forms of action. The notion of Deconstruction
takes peculiar forms in the educational context.
The aim of the article is to interpret J. Derridas concept of deconstruction
in the educational context.
The power of language: construction and deconstruction of logos
According to Leggo (1998), Deconstruction might be treated, in a generic
sense, as a philosophy which claims that the world, which we know and
experience, is constructed and revealed through language. Language is overt,
changeable, vibrating. The power of language enables us to experience doubt,
incredulity, questioning, and irony. We are able to understand reality by
denominating, using terms and oppositions.
Deconstruction opens perception for searching the meanings. According
to Kuiper (1997), deconstruction allows perceiving the openness, which is
presented in terms of how close the scheme is from the point of view of the
Other. Deconstructive openness is the openness for the Other.
J. Derridas work is unique he treated philosophical texts as writing, as
one more genre in literature. Before him, philosophy only treated itself as a
science which was able to find and reflect the Truth and Essence. The
philosopher not only understood but also demonstrated the importance of
written signs conveying the conception of reality: there is always the third
between the world and the speaker seeking to know the world that is, the
written symbols of language. They had to be left only as neutral aids which
helped to express the speakers ideas. It is undeniable that the written symbols
and texts are different in different cultures and minds; and they have different
readers and even interpreters for whom the text was a written text. Words,
their structures and meanings do not represent only regularities of universal
truth or entity. Interpreting texts as the authors social and cultural experience
and subjective product of the world-view reveals the subjective part of the
philosophy.
In his seminal book Off Grammatology, the philosopher expressed the
ideas which later on were interpreted as deconstruction of philosophy. Derridas
followers readjusted the thoughts from the context of grammatology to the
perception and analysis of the literal text. After that, there followed the
deconstruction of the social science texts. Unlike the humanities, in the context
of social sciences not only texts but also institutions are possible to deconstruct.
In the educational context, not only the politics of education can be
deconstructed but also its premises, adequacy, and the outcomes in the school,
a unique and interdependent community. Here we might notice a critical role
of speech, its depth and its boundaries, constructing and conveying reality as
170
III.
not limited to the cyclical logic which is created and proposed by the discourse.
Tracing only the primary meanings of the text, the reader becomes trapped in
the circular logic of the discourse which ceaselessly confirms its truth. While
deconstructing the text, not only the meanings dictated by the discourse are
perceived but also the latent meanings of the text.
Investigation of the rhetorical strategies might be treated as one way of
the text decentralization. It is precisely through the text oppositions to logics,
metaphors, allegories, and neologisms that the latent meanings are disclosed.
The means of rhetoric are extremely ambiguous and allow text liberalization.
The postmodern conception of speech, as well as deconstruction, appreciates
metaphors in the sense that the meaning is constructed but not absorbed from
the words. As being socially constructed, the meaning perception allows
conceptualizing and admitting more than one concept of reality. Vandenboncoeue and Torres (2003) points out that metaphor is the main linguistic
characteristic, leading to creativity and visions of alternative worlds. Metaphors
evaluate different ways of perception. They allow envisaging different,
alternative, and profound meanings.
It might be stated that deconstruction is a way to envisage profound
meanings, notice other meanings than that which dominate in the hierarchic
structure of the text. Deconstruction theory declares suspiciousness towards
unambiguous implications and categorical, single-sided generalizations.
Deconstruction is a covenant to see different meanings: search for them,
distinguish them, not to confine oneself to them and not to forget that there
always exists the Other.
Opening the School System of Meanings
According to Sidorkin (2005), school is a social system which is so subtle,
so complicated, and so unique that it hardly yields to any generalizations.
Sidorkins (2005) ideas yield the conclusion that studying the school, even
more so its improvement cannot be performed within the framework of the
modern discourse. First of all, school is a dialogue, split into meanings, a unique
culture and creativity in activity, for which generalizations and laws describing
the rest of the world of work are not applicable. The school system might be
analyzed individually, invoking qualitative methods and avoiding generalizations. It is a system of meanings and dialogue which has an individual logocentric expression.
School as an institution has its own logo-centrism. According to Allan (2004),
it is expressed by myths, the most important one being the expert status of
teachers cognition in relation to the experience and knowledge of the students.
Cognition might be equated to a metaphor of tree. It is characterized by
consistency, systematization, hierarchy, and validity. School has its own
cogitation models, where it is very important to emphasize what is appropriate,
expected, and desirable. It has concrete evaluation mechanisms. We realize
our own competence, effectiveness, and quality of the action comparing them
with those who embody the Other those parts of communication, qualities,
and commodities that are not admissible. Furthermore, school has mechanisms
of defining and discharging the Other. The Other always exists and school as
an organization tries to expel, delimitate it. However, the Other never departs
and always finds new forms of ostentation. There always exits a fraternity of
172
III.
those who are the most important, productive, awakened, and most seeking;
and there always exists a fraternity of those who bear the outsider label.
Nonetheless, as Gregory (2005) notes, there always exists comparing us with
those people; the remaining ones define their identity and subordination. The
Other represents a different meaning which allows to glimpse that dominating
virtues and meanings are not universal; still, logo-centrism is inferred through
them. According to Allan (2004), schools deconstruction is valuable not as
much as it enables to formulate and give recommendations to the Education
policy and practice, but because it shows ambiguity of the viewpoint on the
educational process and reminds us that there are lots of ways to perceive and
define the Reality. Deconstruction suggests the means for envisaging the
ambiguity:
Convention of the interaction and action in present. Each word, action, or
decision has its own meaning which is implied by the agent. The question is
whether the agent might control all the meanings that could be noticed or
implied into his/her words, his/her speech, pauses, voice timbre, and
intonation. There is a great number of ways to say the same words and every
time we might notice their different meanings.
School is an area of binary oppositions. Formal educational style and informal
relationships of peers, gloomy school environment and youthful schoolboy
tricks, small innocent habits which are better to keep in silence and lifelong
school traditions symbolizing communitys identity and pride these are only
a few examples where diffrance exists. There is a spectrum of meanings and
shades. Sidorkin (2005) describes the possibilities to use the pupil groups and
join their informal relationships while seeking formalized educational objectives.
Solutions ambiguity. School is a system which has some formal difficulties
in organization of management, claims Sidorkin (2005). In some cases, the
most important thing is not the question of whether all the possibilities have
been really evaluated and the solution admitted evaluating all aspects. Is it
really so that the solution guarantees the much desired social justice to the
community? Very often the resolution is conditional: it is the best in the existing
situation but not the best.
School management hierarchy and its decentralization. School is a
bureaucratic system where everything is formalized by means and procedures.
Along with this, it is a social system where everything is alive, dynamic, and
active; and where every member of the community has its own vision and
potential to search. Every school finds its balance between the formalization of
management and the expression of democratic mechanisms where everybody
has his/her right to vote. This structure and hierarchy is not a unique one.
Action orderliness and chaos. According to Sidorkin (2005), each school
has a piece of chaos. It is a system scintillating with energy and vitality, where
there is no purpose to seek precise order and accuracy. There always has to
be some space left for improvisation, surprise, chaos, deviation from the
schedule. That is a part of the study.
So, these are five means to envisage schools logo-centric expressions and
to deconstruct it. There are much more of them and they might be used
remembering that the speech is very important and how important the narrative
is in the community members gatherings. School is a way to speak and to
173
hear each other, to understand, and to face. Although there always is a rooted
illusion that there exist only teachers and pupils potentials, there always is
between them the third the way of speaking. It never performs only an official
part: speech determines in what way we construct reality and how we convey
it. Sidorkin (2005) evokes a three-dimensional space metaphor, claiming that a
three-dimensional view is always constructed from lots of two-dimensional
views. However precisely we would try to define schools system, this would
still be one of two-dimensional views, one of the meanings, one of the
approaches. Only when lots of meanings and approaches confluence, there
unfold the parameters of schools variety and heterogeneity which have to be
perceived while planning and improving education.
Conclusions
It is reasonable to treat postmodern philosophy as a reflection of cultural
and social life in the epoch of knowledge-based economy.
One of the most famous representatives of postmodernism, the French
philosopher J. Derrida introduced a conception of deconstruction.
Deconstruction, applied in different contexts, embodies the viewpoint that
behind the manifested meanings there always exist latent contemplation
patterns and convictions which are described by the philosopher as logocentrism. Logo-centrism acts as a conviction for the cognition of what is the
Truth and how to comprehend it. Every culture, every community has its own
logo-centrism, which defines what the right way to live is. Logo-centrism
displaces the Other.
Text is not the only system of meanings which is possible to deconstruct.
Every system of meanings has its component of metaphysics. Deconstruction
of schools system opens a variety of possible viewpoints and ways of action. It
enables us to envisage myths which transmit logo-centrism and repress the
Other.
The system of social interaction at school can be deconstructed in similar
ways as the system of meanings in the text. The purpose of deconstruction is
not to give certain generalized recommendation for Educational policy and
practice. In this context, deconstruction empowers to understand heterogeneity
and complexity of educational processes and overcome underlying myths about
schools life.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Adams, D. J. Toward a theoretical understanding of postmodernism / D. J. Adams //
Cross currents. 1998. Vol. 47. Iss. 4.
2. Allan, J. Deterritorializations: Putting postmodernism to work on teacher education
and inclusion / J. Allan // Educational philosophy and theory. 2004. Vol. 36.
4. P. 417430.
3. Bauman, Z. Intimation of post modernity / Z. Bauman. London : Routledge, 1992.
4. Bing, Fai L. Design education in the digital era: How academic low achievers respond
to digital imagery / L. Fai Bing. [S. L.] : The Univ. of Hong Kong, 2004.
5. Clausson, N. Practicing Deconstruction Again: Blindness, Insight and the Lovely
Treachery of Words in D. H. Lawrences The Blind Man / N. Clausson // College
Literature. 2007. Vol. 34. 1. P. 106128.
6. Derrida, J. Terror, religion, and the new politics / J. Derrida ; R. Kearney (ed.) //
Debates in continental philosophy. New York : Fordham Univ. Press, 2004. P. 314.
174
III.
7. Derrida, J. Of grammatology / J. Derrida. [S. L.] : The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press,
1976.
8. Gregory, R. J. The Deconstructive Experience. / R. J. Gregory // American Journal of
psychotherapy. 2005. Vol. 59. 4. P. 259305.
9. Kuipers, R. A. Singular interruptions: Rortian liberalism and the ethics of deconstruction / R. A. Kuipers // Knowing otherwise. [S. L.] : Fordham Univ. Press, 1997.
P. 105130.
10. Leggo, C. Open(ing) texts: Deconstruction and responding to poetry / C. Leggo //
Theory into practice (the mag. of the Ohio State Univ.). 1998. Vol. 37. 3.
. 186192.
11. Longstreet, W. S. Early postmodernism in Social education revising Decision
making: the heart of social studies instruction / W. S. Longstreet // The social studies.
2003. Jan/Feb. P. 1114.
12. Sidorkin, A. M. Doing and talking. Schools, complexity, and conversation /
A. M. Sidorkin ; B. Kluwer, J. Kluwer (ed.) // Dialogue as a means of collective
communications. New York : Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2005. P. 241253.
13. Vadenboncoeue, J. A. Constructing and reconstructing teaching roles: a focus on
generative metaphors and dichotomies / J. A. Vadenboncoeue, M. N. Torres //
Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education. 2003. Vol. 24. 1. P. 87103.
13
?
. (, )
, . ,
. ,
,
, .
: , , , , .
175
philosophy. It is proven that the postulate of philosophys coming closer to life,
creation of an active philosophy capable of solving practical questions is
characteristic for the Polish philosophical reflection.
Key words: continental philosophy, the Polish philosophy, active
philosophy , self-determination, practice.
, : , . , , ( )
, ,
.
;
, , , . , , , , ,
.
. : , , ,
, , -?
,
, - , . , :
, ? , , ? , , ,
, , , . , - , ,
.
. -. , (), , , ( ), .
,
, ,
(
). , ,
,
. 176
III.
, . , (, ), , ,
. : .
,
, .
, , , ,
. ( ,
. ) , , , :
, ?
? ( )
? . .
, ,
, .
, .
, ,
, .
-, ,
, , , , . ,
,
( )
. ,
. , , , , ,
( ).
-, ,
; , .
, , , . , ,
, , , .
177
-, , -
,
. , ,
( ,
),
,
. , : , : ?.
,
. .
, XIXXX . ( ). , , XIX ,
,
, , .
, , , .
,
, XIX . ,
- , ,
, , XIX .
.
(
).
.
, . , ( , ) , , ,
. , , .
, XIX ., , ; , ,
-
- . ,
,
- , .
, , ( ),
178
III.
, . , ,
, ,
, , , .
, XIX .
: , , 1830- . .
, , , ,
. XIX . . ,
, .
XIX .
, XXI .
,
, .
, ,
. ,
.
, XIX . ,
, ( ), .
, 1831 . .
, . ,
, , , - .
XIX . .
( , ),
: ,
. ( , , ), . . , ,
,
.
179
XIX .
, , . , , , , ( ,
, ,
). , ,
,
, ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
.
, ,
XIX ., .
,
. , , , ( )
. , ,
.
,
, . (, ),
, - . , ,
,
XIX .
, - , (
) .
, , ( ,
, . , ) ; 180
III.
, , . , - .
- ,
( ,
), ( ) . ,
, , ,
, ,
. , ,
, ,
.
,
. ,
. ,
, , ,
,
.
, , (,
, ), , , , , .
, , , ,
. , , , ,
I . ,
,
( , , , , , )
, . I . (, , , ), .
,
.
, ,
;
181
. . ,
, ,
. ( ) - , , .
, ,
, . ,
, , ,
(, ), ,
, , - , . ,
,
( ) , . , , , .
,
. , ,
, ( ,
),
, . ,
,
, ,
. , ,
, , , .
, ; ,
, ,
.
, . , , (
) ,
( , ) , . ( ) ()
182
III.
. ( , ) , , , . , , ( )
- - .
. , - (
, ,
, ). , () . , , ,
,
( ), . ,
, ,
( )
. , - , ,
, , .
, . XIX . .
(
) ,
- . ,
,
( ) .
, , ,
,
.
. , ,
.
183
, , - ,
, , , ( , ) ,
.
, , , , ,
. . ,
, .
, , ? , ,
, . ,
, , ,
, . , .
,
. ,
,
, . ,
(
), . , ,
, , , , , , , . . , ; ,
, , , , , , .
, ,
, ,
. , 184
III.
( :
) , , . , ,
. ,
( ) . , ,
, .
185
IV
Part IV. CONCRETE ISSUES OF THE MODERN
EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DEVELOPMENT
323 + 342 + 37.0
. . ()
. ( ), ,
/ .
: , , , , .
A. P. Gruzkov (Moscow)
Results of the authors analysis of strategic orientations in territorial
development of the Russian Federation against the background of political
reforming are presented. General trends of regional policy are shown (economic
and social spheres), basic development problems of extremal regions are
characterized, an original model of general education development is discussed
relating to educational development of minor and/or indigenous people of the
North.
, , ,
,
.
117997, , . , . 33.
E-mail:eliseeva.e@mail.ru.
186
IV.
Key words: model of education, the regional policy, reforming of education,
regional management, regional development of education.
() - . ,
89 .
-
,
(), , . -
1992 .
, . - , .
1993 . , . , :
- (), ;
, , ,
( -);
(, ).
, , () . , , ,
,
, .
,
-. :
, , .
,
.
,
. 26.06.1995
594
187
, .
, , , .
,
.
, -, -, , -, - . , ,
, ,
, .
, -
, :
,
, ;
, ,
;
, ,
, ;
,
, ;
, ,
;
, - , (
, , , ).
, , ,
. 2000 .
2 5 % , . ,
, .
, 188
IV.
, , .
, -
, ,
.
-
, , -
, .
, -
,
, , , [1; 2]. :
-
. , - ( ) (,
, ), ;
, - . , , ,
, ;
.
, ,
.
.
,
.
() , ,
- . , . , :
.
189
[3],
. ,
,
,
,
[4; 5]:
:
;
: ;
: ,
.
:
;
, ;
, , , ;
,
, .
().
, , , , .
, .
,
, , , . ; (, );
.
:
.
190
IV.
,
.
,
, ,
.
[6; 7].
; ,
, , - , , .
[8; 9], : , ,
, .
,
, , .
, , ,
. ,
, ,
; , , ; ,
- , .
, , , , , .
,
,
- .
191
.
, ,
, ( ) .
, , ,
-
.
, 1012 .
( , , ),
- . , , , .
,
: , ,
. 1015 .
(, , ).
, . , ,
- . . ,
. ,
,
, .
. - , .
, ,
, ,
. , , ,
192
IV.
.
: ? ,
, -, -,
. ,
,
, , .
, , , ,
, . :
. , ,
. , , , . .
,
, , .
, , .
, , , .
, .
. , , .
, - .
,
. , ,
, , .
, , ,
, - , ,
. , .
193
1. , . . : . / . . . . : , 2006.
2. , . . : . / . . . . :
, 2006.
3. , . . : / . . . . : , 2005.
4. , . . - - / . . // . 2003. 12; 2004. 1.
5. , . . : / . . // Publicity. 2006. 1.
6. , . . : /
. . // Weekly. 2007. 273.
7. . 2000-. . : , 2007.
8. , . . / . . //
: .
. : , 2000.
9. , . . / . . // . 2002.
4.
37.014
,
*
. . , . . ()
. ,
,
. , . ,
.
* 21.6.
, ,
- - , .
630090, . , . , . 8, . 420.
-mail: maierbo@gmail.com.
, -
.
630005, . , . , . 96, . 803.
-mail: etracken@gmail.com
194
IV.
: , , , .
, , ,
. , - . , XX .
XXI . [1; 2].
, .
, . , ,
, , [3; 4].
. - , . ,
. ,
, (, ).
195
- XXI
, 22 2000 . () , . 2003 ., 2005 . .
,
. , ,
, , ,
,
.
. -
, , [5],
, , <>
, ,
,
[6].
, . ,
, , -
(, ).
. . [1] .
,
,
, , , , , .
, . 1960- ., .
, , , -
196
IV.
. . [4]
,
.
,
, . ,
, , ,
,
, .
. , .
. [7]
, , ,
( ,
); , ,
.
. . . [8], , :
, ,
( ) ,
;
, ; , ,
- - .
, -;
;
, . , .
197
, . , , ,
,
.
2002 .
(Networked Readiness Index, NRI),
. NRI
2007 .: (, ,
) .
, 2007 . 72- 70- ,
, , , , , , ,
, , , , . -
,
. , - , ,
. (71- ), (73-), (75-).
122 .
,
, ,
,
, , (20022010 .) .
1999 . [10].
: ;
; ;
; -
; ; .
, ,
, . , ,
,
, , -
198
IV.
.
, - , ;
- . ,
, [11].
, ( , ) 1990- ., . , ,
, , ,
,
, . , , ,
, ;
[12].
,
,
, . ,
, . 20062007 .
- , ,
, 100 %. , ,
.
2006 . 1,5 .
2006 .
23 000 , 18 000,
199
, . 50 000 95 %
. ,
,
, , . 2007 .
. ,
.
, :
, , , , , , ;
, , ;
, , ,
; ,
, ;
2007 . , 2015 .
20-;
;
,
;
,
, . ;
.
1. , . . / . . //
http://www.postindustrial.ru/titles.shtml?book=1.
2. , . : / . . . : -, 2000. 406 .
200
IV.
3. , . - . / . . . : , 1999. 302 .
4. , . / . . - . : , 1991. 286 .
5. , . . : : /
. . . . : , 2003.
6. // http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
7. , . /
. . . : , 2006.
8. , . . : - / . . // . 1996. 2. . 511.
9. http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gitr/rankings2007.pdf.
10. (1999 .) / . 1999. 3. . 311.
11. , . . / . . // . 2005. 1.
12. 2007 . // http://
www.aplana.ru/news/fullpublication.asp?id=139&page=1&year.
37.0 + 371
. . , . . ()
, . . ,
, . ,
, . , .
: , , , , , .
, -
.
630126, . , . , 28, . 204.
E-mail: Pushkarev73@mail.ru
,
630126, . , . , 28, . 204.
E-mail: Pushkarev73@mail.ru
201
INFORMATION AS A MEANS OF INTEGRATION
OF A SCIENCE AND FORMATION
, , ,
,
. . ,
[1, . 10]. ,
.
.
, -
. .
, , . , ,
[2, . 86]. , , .
, , , , . . ,
, , . . , , .
, , 202
IV.
, , . ,
.
. , , . ,
,
- . , ,
.
, ,
,
.
,
, , .
,
. ,
- ( ) [3, . 168].
? ,
. ,
. ,
.
. ,
.
[4, . 206207]. -
- . , ,
- . 203
- .
- , ,
[5].
,
, -
,
.
.
,
, -
[6, . 189]. . . , ,
[1, . 3536].
-
, ,
XXI [6, . 189192]. 35 % , 1995
[5].
- ,
,
. ,
.
.
, , ,
.
, , , . ,
- : ,
, , . .
204
IV.
.
,
, . . ,
. , ,
, , [5].
, , .
,
, .
() ,
. [5].
:
;
; ; .
,
, . , ,
, - , - .
. - , , .
- . , , . , ,
, ,
, .
- , 205
. :
, ;
; ,
; , , ; , .
,
.
,
,
, , , , .
:
, , -, - . . ,
. , : ;
; [5].
, - . -,
,
, - . ,
,
. -, ,
, , . -, , . ,
, 206
IV.
. -,
, , .
. , , , ,
. , ,
, .
, .
1. , . . Hi-Tech : , : . . -. . / . . , 2007. 39 .
2. , . .
/ . . , . . , . . . :
- , 2007. . V (. . ). 330 .
3. , . . / . . // . 2007. . . 1. . 168172.
4. , . . / . . ,
. . // . . : . . . . (15
, 1999). ., 1999. . 206207.
5. : () [ ]. : http://www.cnews.ru/edu2004/info/rus.shtml
6. , . . /
. . , . . // . : . . . . - / . .
. . . . 3. , 2004. . 189192.
. . ()
; , ,
.
630005, . , . , . 28.
E-mail: oksvital@ngs.ru
207
(, )- ().
, ,
, , .
, - ,
, .
: , ,
, .
J. V. Lebedeva (Novosibirsk)
In the article, the problem of deviant behavior of minors is considered. The
author analyzes the statistics of criminality among children and teenagers and
arrives at the conclusion that the origins of the problem lie in a wrong choice of
the way of development of the personality of the concrete child (teenager, young
man)-offender (delinquent). This choice is influenced by the changed social
and economic conditions of the society life which indirectly fostered aggravation
of the criminal situation among the youth, drug abuse spreading, social disorder,
and existential vacuum. In the authors opinion, nurturing the emotional
responsiveness beginning from the earliest, preschool age can become one of
the factors determining successful formation of the personality.
Key words: deviant behavior, juvenile, younger schoolboy, emotional
empathy, development prevention.
, ,
, [5, . 3]. ,
; , .
, , [3, . 47].
. ( 66 %).
. , 90 % ,
[1, . 194].
, . 2004 .
2005 . 2605
208
IV.
, 18 772 , 5008
( 19,1 % , 2004 .), 2743 ( 0,3 % ).
,
, , , ,
, .
0,9 [8, . 48].
(1617 ), 73,6 % .
.
, .
. . , , [9, . 4].
, . 1,5 [9, . 5].
(1114 ). , , 100 . [2, . 5].
( 1014 % ) , ,
, ; , .
, ,
, . (1977 .) , () , , , , ,
. 240
.
, ( , .), ,
,
, , , [4, . 88].
209
,
[6, . 54]. ,
2004 2005 . ( , , , , , , , ), , 1417 13,8 %
. , , 3,8 % ; 4,2 % . , 15,3 %
, 15 % .
, . , .
(sensation seeking); , , , ,
[. : 6, . 28].
, , , -
: ; ; ; ; ; ;
; ; ; , ,
(33 %), (18 %), (42 %) [6, . 62].
. .
:
( , ,
, ;
; , , . .);
- (
- , , . , , , , );
,
.
[7, . 80].
, , ,
, , , .
210
IV.
. , , , , [. : 4, . 73].
, .
, . ,
, , , .
,
,
.
,
. , ,
.
:
(
);
( );
( );
(
, ).
, :
;
();
, , ,
( );
( );
.
, : ; ; ; ,
.
-
211
, , , , .
,
. , , , , .
, ,
.
. , .
,
. . ,
. , , .
, ; ,
.
: ; ; -;
; 10
.
. , .
:
10 % ;
47 % ; - 40 %
, 10- 39 %
;
212
IV.
15 % .
:
10- , -,
,
.
- .
:
50 % ;
16 % ; 10- 21,7 % ;
- 10 % ; 30 % .
, , -, 10- .
:
;
;
.
, . . . : , , , ,
, , , .
: 25 %; 30 %;
35 %; 35 %.
: 25 %; 25 %; 25 %;
25 %.
,
, . -
213
10- .
: .
1. , . . : / . . . . : -,
2004. 315 .
2. , . . /
. . // . : , 2001. 224 . (. ).
3. , . .
/ . . . , 1997.
4. , . . : . //
. . . . : , 2004. 192 .
5. , . . -
: . . . . / . . , 2003. 23 c.
6. . : . . . , . . . : , 2002. 278 .
7. , . . : . / . . . .,
1998. 267 .
8. 19972004 . : . / . . . . : . . - ,
2005. 136 .
9. , . .
: . . . / . . , 1999. 22 .
37.0 + 13 + 316.7
( )
. . ()
, , ;
, , ,
, ,
, .
: , , , , .
, , .
630128, . , . , . 28.
E-mail: shulga.61@mail.ru
214
IV.
LEISURE AND EDUCATION OF THE PERSON
(HISTORICAL CONTEXT)
I. I. Shulga (Novosibirsk)
In the article, there are considered the problem of free time, the definitions
of its essence, its structure and educational potential. The author performs a
brief retrospective analysis of the viewpoints of well-known representatives of
the basic philosophical schools on this issue and arrives at the conclusion that
free time, leisure can be considered to be an area of development of the positive
forces of the person, one of the basic conditions of its self-development,
introduction to the cultural heritage and creation of new cultural values; that
is, a way of socialization of the person.
Key words: free time, leisure, development of the person, socialization,
civilization of leisure.
, , ,
, - , ,
. . . , . . .
.
, , , , , .
: ,
,
, ,
, , . , .
, , .
, , ,
, . ,
, , , , , [1, . 117]. , , ,
. ,
. , . , . , . 215
[. : 5, . 28].
,
[.
: 5, . 29]. , , .
XIX . . ,
, . , , , . , ,
, , ,
, [2, . 78].
. . ,
: , . (), (). . ,
, ,
, [4, . 56].
, - , - , ,
. . ,
, . , , .
. leisure ()
. loisir, . () . ,
, . . . : , , ,
, . ,
:
, ,
[6, . 481]. ,
, , ,
216
IV.
, , , .
XX . .
(. , . , . .). , (. , . , . .). , . ,
: , , ; , ; ,
, , , [5, . 31].
.
- . ,
( - ),
, ,
, .
, , , ,
. : ,
, ,
, .
, , , . , , , ,
.
.
.
. 1887 . XX . . , ,
.. , : , (. , . ); ,
,
(. , . ).
217
XX .
. . -, . . , . . , . . ,
. . , . . , . . , . . . , . .
, , [3].
(
, , , , , , ) , , , , ,
,
. ,
-
, , -
.
,
, , .
,
. ,
, , . , , (, -, , , )
.
.
, ,
.
-
. , ,
, ,
,
, .
218
IV.
1. . : . . / . ., 1884.
2. , . : 30 . . 23. / . , . . . : ,
1967.
3. , . . / . . . . : , 2000.
200 .
4. , . . / . . // . . : , 1977. 207 .
5. , . . : - / . . . : - ,
2003. 127 .
6. , . . : 4 . . 1. () /
. . . . : , 1994. 800 .
37.013.73
. . ()
,
, , , .
. , , .
: , , , , , .
I. V. Ivanov (Novosibirsk)
In the article, there is considered the problem of somatic education which is
understood as an area of purposeful pedagogical activity directed not only on
preservation but also on formation and strengthening of health, positive
, , ,
- .
630008, . , . , . 113.
E-mail: ivanov.58@mail.ru
219
motivation to a healthy lifestyle. It is impossible to overcome the negative
influences and improve the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of life
without changing consciousness and motivation of the social models of persons
behavior. The author suggests approaching the study of the person from the
point of view of psychosomatics, claiming that the psychosomatic harmonization
is the main valeological method of restoration of the persons internal integrity.
Key words: somatics, training, education, socium, culture, educational
policy, integration,
, , ,
, , , . . ,
, . (
), : (, . soma
), ( . psyche ), (. nous ). , .
.
,
.
,
, .
, , . , , , ,
.
( , ), . : ,
, ,
, .
,
, ,
.
, . -
[1, c. 1824] ( ); ( -
220
IV.
).
.
,
. , ,
,
- , , . ,
-, .
, , , .
. , ,
, .
( ). .
(. holos ).
, . , , , , ,
, . ,
[11, c. 168].
;
, ,
[5, c. 611]. , , [12, c. 166].
. ,
.
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
. , , , .
, ,
221
.
( , , , , . .)
,
, . . , , ; ,
, .
, . . [1, . 182184],
. -, ( ) ,
. -, , , , , , . -,
.
, , ,
. ,
, .
, . , ,
,
. . ,
,
. , , ,
, .
; . ,
,
. -
, , , ,
.
( ) . . . - (, , ) . . .
,
222
IV.
:
, , , ,
, [6, c. 7]. ,
[7, c. 252253]. : ,
, :
, , ,
,
[7, c. 252253].
, . . : ,
;
, ,
.
,
:
[8, c. 27].
,
I . . .
. . . , . . , , , , ,
[10]. . . . . , .
, ,
. , , , , , ,
.
, , , , . . [9, c. 237239].
. .
. ,
223
. . . .
,
, .
, , , .
. . , . . .
, ,
.
I ., , , , , (, , , ) .
, ,
, , , , ,
.
. , , , .
, ,
;
-
. -
,
,
[2; 3; 12].
, . , , , . .
, (
) . ,
.
, :
, ;
() ;
.
224
IV.
,
.
, .
,
, .
, ;
, [2, . 56]. , , , . . , ,
, , , , ,
, .
,
, , ( ), ; , , ,
;
, (
). , , - , .
, ,
, , . .
.
, , , . , , , ,
.
1. , . . / . . .
, 1985. 248 .
2. , . . ( ) / . . . .,
1997. 209 .
225
3. , . . : / . . . ., 1993. 180 .
4. , . . / . . . ., 1996.
208 .
5. , . : . . / . , . . -,
1984. 76 .
6. , . . . . : 2 . / . . . ., 1952. . 2.
7. , . . . . : 2 . / . . . ., 1951. . 1.
8. , . . / . . . . : ,
1953.
9. , . . ( 150- . . , ) / . . , . . , . . // : . . ,
1995. 295 .
10. , . . / . . ; . . . // XIX . . : , 1987.
11. , . . (section aurea) / . . .
., 1996. 168 .
12. : / . . . . , . . . . : . - , 1993. 166 .
13. , . : . . / . . -, 1988. 296 .
378 + 070.11
XXI
. . ()
.
,
, .
, , , .
, , .
,
, ,
, - .
644080, . , . , . 5, . 213.
E-mail: fr2003@bk.ru
226
IV.
,
.
: ,
, - .
I. G. Bagno (Omsk)
In the article, there are considered two major aspects of the problem of optimal
conjunction of the domestic and world experience in specialist training. The
first aspect is continuity and organicity of the connection between professional
culture and general culture of the concrete society; the second, the dependence
of the dynamics of the society development on such basic mechanisms as selfmanufacture and self-renewal. From the authors viewpoint, the technics is a
universal, panhuman phenomenon, a phenomenon of human culture.
Recognition of the variety of types of the technics, that are directly or indirectly
connected with the cultural wealth of this or that local culture, creates necessary
preconditions for self-understanding and development of the societys selfawareness. According to the author, orientation to individuality can become a
strategy of survival and development for the peripheral institution of higher
education. To this end, it is necessary to keep and multiply the positive experience
which has been accumulated by the domestic educational system.
Key words: essential characteristics of technics, characteristics of technics
in aspect of local culture, evolution types of technics: universal and type of
local-culture.
- ,
.
.
. (
) .
, , .
. , , -
. . ,
, - . .
227
( , ).
, ,
, , , . ,
(), , ().
, , -, [6, . 210].
. --
. . -
[6, . 210]. ,
, ,
.
,
,
, . . ,
,
. ,
,
.
, , , , ,
. , ,
, ,
, ,
, , , .
, ,
.
-
; ,
. , (
228
IV.
, ) ,
, ,
.
, . , ,
,
.
[3, . 32].
, .
. , : , .
, (, ,
) , , , . ,
, , , - ,
, .
, .
. . ,
.
,
. , , .
- , , , . , , , ,
, , , ,
. . .
, . , , , 229
, , , , . , , . ,
, , , , .
, , . , , , ,
() [3].
. , . , [5].
, 5 . ,
.
, . ,
. --,
, [6]. , ,
, .
. ,
. .
. , ,
. ,
. --
.
[6, . 213]. ,
. , , : ,
. ,
, .
.
[4, . 132]. , ,
. , , , , ,
.
. , .
230
IV.
, .
.
,
, , .
, .
,
. ,
, , , ,
, ,
, - 80- 90- . . , , ,
. , ,
, , ,
, . .
,
,
1980- ., , ,
[2]. , . . :
67 ,
[7, . 8283].
.
, , , , . .
, , .
; , .
231
, ( ).
, , ,
.
.
- . . , , , . , ,
, ,
[1, . 28].
, . (
) .
,
. , ,
. ,
, . . , ,
[1].
, . , , , , , , .
, ,
,
.
:
1) - , , ;
2) ,
- ;
3) - : ,
, . .,
- , , ;
4) ,
;
232
IV.
5) .
, , - - , .
1. , . / . . . : , 2002.
390 .
2. , . . : . . / . . . :
-, 2000. 384 .
3. , . . / . . . . : , 2004. 200 .
4. , . : . . / . . . : , 2005. 256 .
5. , . . / . .
. : , 2001. 408 .
6. --, . : . . / . -- //
. . : , 2000. . 164232.
7. , . : . . / . . . : , 1997. 464 .
8. , . : : . . / . . . : , 1993. 447 .
101.1 + 316
(- )*
. . ()
-.
- ,
(
, , ). , ;
, (). * 07-06 00 390.
, , , .
630048, . , . -, . 11, . 25.
E-mail: chuyko_m@ngs.ru.
233
;
.
: , , , , , .
S. V. Kushchenko (Novosibirsk)
In the article, there is given authorial analysis of the relation between the
rational and irrational in the public consciousness in one of possible aspects
social-informational. The author substantiates a possibility of a socialinformational approach to understanding the rational and irrational, according
to which the rational is mainly the external for the subject information about
something (and, correspondingly, the irrational is the internal for the subject
information about something). The author considers the relation between the
rational and irrational as a mutually approaching process initiated by the
subject according to its needs. This connection results in diffusion of the internal
and external information; that is, formation of new information (concept).
This process is one side of the social activity of the subject. To describe this
process, one needs to use the complementarity principle.
Key words: rational, irrational, public consciousness, principle addition,
social information, correlation.
-. , ,
. , [1] - ,
, .
.
,
, . , <> () ,
,
[2, c. 691].
234
IV.
, , , [2, c. 692]. . . ,
,
,
( ) , ,
. . [2, c. 692].
, , , . , . .
, , . , , ,
, . . : <> ,
, ,
, , .
,
, ; , , [3, c. 12]. , . . . , , . . , :
, , , ,
,
[. : 3, c. 23]. .
(), : , ,
, ; , ,
; <>
, , [. : 3, c. 27]. . . , [. : 3, c. 28] ,
, ,
, .
235
, , ,
: -,
; -, ,
; -,
,
,
.
, , , .
, ( ).
, ( ),
, , .
,
, , .
, . , , .
. , . , , ,
. ,
. , ,
.
, . , , , , .
:
(. ), (. ),
(. ) .
( ).
236
IV.
.
,
, [4, c. 181].
.
( ) ,
, .
.
, , ,
,
. ,
.
, , , , .
: ,
.
, , . ,
. . ( ), . .
, . . .
, ,
[5, c. 152]. ,
, , : . ( ! !)
- ( ) , . ,
[5, c. 152]. , , , , . : ,
,
.
.
, ,
237
, - .
,
( ).
. . ,
. , , . ,
,
( ).
. , .
,
, ( ), .
, .
, .
,
, . . , , , , ,
, . ,
() . , , , , , ,
. , ,
.
, ,
, ,
,
238
IV.
( ),
.
, - ,
. .
,
,
. , , ,
( ).
, , ( ). , , ,
,
: , , .
, , , .
, - , , , , , (, ). , , ,
, , .
. . : ,
, .
. ,
[6, c. 183]. ,
( )
[6, c. 179].
, , . , .
, 239
, - , ,
. , ,
, .
, .
,
. ,
, ( , ) . , ,
( , ).
,
. , , . ,
.
, , , .
, ,
. , , , .
,
.
,
, , . -
. ,
, , ,
.
-
, .
240
IV.
1. , . .
/ . . // . . . 2006. 1(35), . 185200.
2. / . . . ., 2000.
3. , . . / . . // : . .
. : , 1976. 367 .
4. , . : 6 . : . . / . . ., 1965. . 4, . 1.
5. , . . : 2 . /
. . . . : , 1983. . 2.
6. , . : . . / . .
. : , 1999. 432 .
339.1 + 378 + 13
. . ()
. ,
.
, (,
, ).
( ,
).
: , , , , -.
S. G. Borisowa (Nowosibirsk)
A contradictory state of marketing theory and practice in Russia is analyzed
in the article. On one hand, understanding the necessity of marketing as the
, ,
.
630126, . , . , . 24, . 167.
-mail: s3257@rambler.ru
241
most adequate concept of enterprise management is growing in the modern
conditions. On the other hand, there is inadequate attitude towards this concept
in real business (for example, there is a skeptical point of view on marketing
technologies; and the influence of marketologists on our domestic management,
especially higher leadership, is still insignificant). The author also touches upon
the topic of improving the marketing education (not only in the higher educational
institutions but also in the entire additional professional education as well).
Key words: crisis of marketing, philosophy of modern business, marketing
management concept, basic education, business education.
,
, . . , , . ,
, : 1970- . [2, . 3739]. ,
:
(, , , ,
, . .);
( , ) , ;
, ,
.
, , , ? ,
,
, ,
.
, , . : , ,
, ?
, : , ? : . ,
.
: -,
, , . . 80 ( , , ), 15 . , .
. ,
242
IV.
, . , . ,
, :
(
);
;
-, ;
,
( , , . .) ( );
;
( , ).
, , (, )
. : ,
; - , ;
, ;
, ; , , . .
:
(
);
- (,
PR- . .);
,
(
);
(
:
, ).
, ,
, , ,
.
( ?) .
-
.
243
, . .
, . ,
(46 %) , 29 %
, 5 % [3, . 7182]. - .
.
.
, , , (90,5 %) (62,7 %). ,
(46,8 %) , , , ,
.
, , , .
,
(67,1 %) -
.
[3, . 7175]. : .
,
.
, : ,
, , , [3, . 75].
,
,
( , ), () , - . .
, (24,7 %). , 244
IV.
. , , , , , ,
( !) .
, ,
( ) , ( ,
, , 1990- .).
,
.
1. ,
() .
. : ,
. , ,
, , . , , . , [4, . 1112].
,
, ( ,
). ,
, ,
. , . ,
, (,
,
, . .).
( ),
( ).
.
. , , - , , , - .
,
, -, 245
. ,
.
, ; , (
)
.
( ) . . , -
. -,
,
, . , , ,
-: , . , .
, :
. , ,
, , ,
.
.
-, : , . .
.
-, ( , )
, . ( , )
, -,
.
,
.
( 246
IV.
- ),
(
),
.
,
. [5, . 26]. ,
, , , . .
,
-, ,
, , , [2, . 37].
, ,
. ,
.
( , , ) -.
2. ,
. ,
, ,
, , [1, . 441].
, ( , )
.
-, .
. ( ) .
3. , . .
( ), 247
. , ,
, ,
[6, . 1819].
(, ) , . ( , ) ,
, . , , , , . .
,
. , . ,
,
- :
( ). , , , ;
( ). ,
.
, , -, .
, , . ,
, ( ). :
, ,
. 196080- .,
. ,
;
. , .
248
IV.
1. , . . / . . ,
. . // . 2007. 5(71).
. 438443.
2. , . , : . . / . .
. : , 2001. 480 .
3. , . : / . , . , . // . 2005. 9. . 6786.
4. , . . : . . / . ; .
. . , . . . . : , 2005. 272 .
5. , . . : .
. / . . . : , 2004. 656 .
6. , . . :
. . / . , . . . : , 2004. 240 .
7. , . . : / . . // . 2006. 1(61). . 29.
37.015.4
. . ()
. , . .
( )
, . ,
, .
: , , , , , , .
, ; , .
630098, , . , 23.
E-mail: nn_savina@mail.ru
249
THE PERSONAL FACTORS OF DELINQUENCY
N. N. Savina (Novosibirsk)
In conditions of social crisis of a society questions antisocial behaviour of
teenagers have a special urgency. In clause it is shown, that objective conditions
of a life generate a real opportunity such behaviour. Attitudes to the given
opportunities are defined by personal factors of the teenager. The role of the last
(personal factors) in formation of the criminal person also is great, as well as
a role of an adverse social environment. It is shown, that there is a close
communication psychoticism, neuroticism and criminal antisocial behaviour
of the person of the teenager.
Key words: determinism, freedom, delinquency, hyperactivity, psychoticism,
neuroticism,antisocial behaviour.
, () . - ,
- . , ,
- ,
. ,
- ,
, , - .
, , . ,
, , . . ,
, , , . , , ,
.
, ,
, .
, .
, .
, , .
,
250
IV.
. . , , , [1, . 189].
.
, . ,
[2, . 161]. , ,
, , , . , . ,
.
, . . , .
.
.
( ) , .
, , . ,
, ,
.
[3] , ,
, ( ) , ,
. ,
, , .
, . , ,
.
760 . 217 , , . . 543 , , . , .
. 14
18 .
. [4],
/ , , .
251
. , , , .
: , ,
.
, ,
.
, , .
, . ,
, , ,
, , . / . ,
. , , . ,
, . .
, , , , . ,
, .
.
. , . . . 1415
. 1618 ( , ) . ,
1415 , .
1415
,
1618 .
252
IV.
, 1618- . : , , [4],
; , , ;
[5] ,
, .
-, , , ,
. , , .
, .
. , , . ,
, .
, , 14
.
[6]. . , . 1415- -. 14-
[7]. , , ,
. .
, , ,
, , ,
,
.
, . , ,
.
254
IV.
, , .
, .
, . , , , .
1. , . . / . . //
. , 1971.
2. , . / . . ., 1965.
3. , . / . , . . .,
2001.
4. Eysenck, S. The dual nature of extraversion / S. Eysenck, H. Eysenck / Personality
structure and measurement. London : Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1969.
5. Eysenck, H. Crime and Personality: an empirical study of three-factor theory /
H. Eysenck, M. Eysenck // British Jornal of Criminology. 1970. Nr 10.
6. Farrington, D. Juvenile delinquency. The school years : current issues in the socialization
of young people / D. Farrington. London : Routledge, 1992.
7. Heaven, P. Personality and self-reported delinquency : a longitudinal analysis /
P. Heaven // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1996. Nr 37.
8. Lane, D. Personality and antisocial behaviour : a long-term study / D. Lane // Personality
and Individual Differences. 1987. Nr 8.
316 + 37
-
. . ()
- , ,
.
, . : , ,
- , ,
.
127562, , , . 30. . 104.
E-mail: aktor@mail.ru
255
, ( ) .
, .
,
.
: , , , , .
A. A. Popov (Moscow)
New priorities of the social and economic development of Russia, connected
with the introduction of new technologies and innovative development,
objectively result in the necessity of new concepts of the human potential
development anthropological ones. With their help, it is possible to change the
existing modes of the basic educational process, which is understood by the author
as a process of the persons self-determination. The author distinguishes the
following types of educational activity: management, design, and research. He
also claims that it is necessary to move from the principle of subjects to the
humanitarian-technological principle of the education organization. This is
because the humanitarian technology (not knowledge) is the unit of the practice
reproduction. According to the author, it is necessary to employ a certain sphere
approach in the organization of the conditions for the human potential
development. The essence of this approach is the construction of an educational
society which oversteps the boundaries of the organizational structures of the
existing education system.
Key words: anthropological technologies, human potential, humanitarian
technology, open educational systems, sphere approach.
,
. :
, .
1960- 1990- . - ,
. 1990- . - , .
,
- .
256
IV.
- , , , () . : -
- .
:
, , ,
.
. - .
, .
,
.
, , ,
. , . , ,
. (, , , .), ( , , ),
.
, . ,
, .
, , () , .
, :
( ) ( ). ?
,
. 257
.
, , . . , , , , .
. ,
,
, . () : ; ; ;
; -
; , , .
-
,
- .
. .
( ) .
, (, .), , . ,
,
- .
,
. : ( ); ( ); ( ).
, ,
, , . ,
() , , . , ,
- ,
258
IV.
. ;
, ,
(, , , .)
.
, .
.
, .
. - () ,
, .
,
.
,
, . ;
, .
- , . , ,
, .
, , , . ;
, , ,
,
. ,
.
- -
, .
, , 259
, -
,
( ) .
,
XXI ,
XXI : / ; ; /-; - ; / ;
.
. . , , .
, , , , .
, . (-) ,
. , , .
,
.
.
,
XVIII .
.
, , , ,
(, ).
, ,
(, ,
- ).
, ? 260
IV.
?
, ,
( . , - . , - . . ).
,
. ( , ,
, .) .
(), .
, . , ,
.
1. , . : / . , . , . // . 1996. 4. - . 522.
2. , . . . /
. . . . : -, 1995. 448 .
3. , . /
. . . : , 1999. 336 .
4. , . : . .
/ . . . : , 2000. 351 .
5. , . . / . . //
. ., 1991. . 618.
6. , . . / . . // . : UFO-press,
2001. . 1428.
7. , . / . . : -, 1996. 208 .
8. , . / . //
. . : , 1991. . 195206.
261
37.0+316.7+13
. . ()
,
( )
(). , -
.
: , , , (),
.
E. B. Grebenkin (Novosibirsk)
In article, the behavioral stereotypes in the relations between teachers and
schoolchildren are analyzed; the ways of settling school conflicts, innovational
in the conceptual and contextual planes, are examined. These ways are called
mediation. Mediation is specially organized conciliatory procedures integrated
in the educational-training process of school and aimed at making reparation
for the harm done to the victim.
Key words: conflict, conflict interaction, conflict situations, settlement of
conflicts mediation, the school reconciliation service.
, , .
,
, , .
(
, ), ( ,
, ), ( , , .
630126, , . , ., 28, . 410.
E-mail: rusforscher@mail.ru
262
IV.
, ),
.
. , -.
, , . , (, , ) , ,
. , , , , .
. , , , .
.
. , 1020 % .
, , , , -, , . . , , : !.
, ,
, , , , .
, . ( ) . (, ), .
,
, , , .
.
. . : ( ) ,
, , ;
() , ,
263
, , ;
() , , [4, . 17].
(810 ), .
,
. ( ). , , ,
. , ( ) .
. ,
.
.
( , , , ).
. ,
, , . , .
.
. ,
, .
,
.
, .
, . , ,
, .
, , . , ,
. , ,
, , . , -
264
IV.
: , .
, , ,
. , , , .
, ,
.
.
, .
, ,
. , .
, .
, ,
, , , ,
.
. ,
. ,
.
[1].
(), . , ( , .)
().
. mediare ().
: ; ; ; ; ; . , - , .
. -, , . ,
, , 265
. -, ( ) . ,
( ,
). ,
, , ,
. -, , - , . , , , .
.
, [2, c. 23].
: ;
, ,
; ; , ; , ; ,
; ;
, ,
;
, , ,
;
,
; , ; ,
- ,
. [5, . 103106].
. .
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
.
266
IV.
, ,
.
[3, . 299]. .
, .
, ,
.
,
. : ,
. ,
: , .
. , , , .
,
,
.
. ,
,
.
1. , . . : / . . . / : , 2005. 256 .
2. , . . : /
. . // . 2006. . 6. . 2328.
3. : / . . ; . . ; .
. . . . : , 2002. 832 .
4. , . . /
. . . . : , 1991. 128 .
5. Mediation in der Schule: Konflikte Loesen in der Sekundarstufe I / hrsg. : Jamie
Walker. Berlin : Cornelsen Scriptor, 2001. 223 s.
267
PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION
N. V. Nalivaiko
Editor-in-chief, Doctor
of Philosophical Sciences,
Professor, Director of the
Research Institute of
Philosophy of Education
at Novosibirsk State
Pedagogical University
V. I. Parshikov
Assistant Editor-in-chief,
Doctor of Philosophical
Sciences
B. O. Mayer
Executive Editor, Doctor
of Philosophical Sciences
ISSN 18110916
The founders
of the journal:
2(23) 2008
Editorial Board:
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor
V. A. Dmitrienko
Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Science
A. Zh. Zhafyarov
Pro-Rector of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor,
A. A. Korolkov
Academician of the Russian Academy of Education
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor
P. V. Lepin
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Deputy Chair
O. N. Smolin
of the State Duma Committee on Education and Science
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
V. S. Stepin
President of the Russian Philosophical Society
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Director
V. V. Tselishchev
of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Siberian
Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Academician
Ya. S. Turbovskoi
of the Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor
A. K. Chernenko
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor
A. N. Chumakov
Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor
N. M. Churinov
CONTENT
Word of the editor .................................................................................................................. 3
PHILOSOPHY
OF EDUCATION
2(23)2008
The edition is
carried out with
the financial
support of the
Administration
of Novosibirsk
Region
Editors
A. G. Makhova,
V. I. Smirnova.
Translator
L. B. Vertgeim
Electronic
make-up operator
Yu. V. Pushkarev
Typesetting
T. S. Kosenko,
E. S. Susueva
630126
Novosibirsk,
Vilyuiskaya street, 28
Tel. (383)268-16-71
Signed for printing
07.06.2008
Format 70x108/16.
Offset printing.
Offset paper.
Printers sheets: 25.
Publishers
sheets: 25,5.
Circulation
1000 issues.
Order 307.
Siberian Branch
of the Russian
Academy of Sciences
Publishers
630090
Novosibirsk,
Morskoi avenue, 2
1. , - ( ) , :
) , , , ,
, , ;
) , , , (),
() , ;
) ,
;
) , , ;
) , , .
2. , ,
.
3. , ,
. .
, . .
4. :
4.1. : , ( ); ( ). .
.
4.2. (700 ), : , ,
,
( 10). .
4.3. , ,
.
.
4.4.
7.12003 . . ,
270
, ,
.
4.5. :
, , (), , , (, , ), , , , -mail. ,
.
4.6. ( Word). 0,5 . . (812 .) -4, 1,5 .
Times New Roman. 14. 2,0 . ,
.
5.
( ) ,
. ,
(
).
6. , ,
, , , . . . , ,
.
7. .
.
271
. .
:
, , , , .
2002 .
.
; ,
,
- .
,
, , - .
( ) :
;
, ;
;
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
: ( ).
.
.
. . :
,
, .
,
, .
.
:
./: (383) 330-17-58; : (383) 333-37-55
470 .
: , 630090 / 187, , , 2.
:
e-mail: nnalivaiko@mail.ru
: www. phil-ed.ru
: , 630126, , , . , 28, . (383) 268-16-71.
272