Summary

Analysis

-----------Greene,Stuart."ArgumentasConver 2/17/13 sation:TheRoleofInquiryinWritingaR esearched Argument." TheSubjectIsResearch. Ed.WendyBishopandPavelZemlians ky.Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook,2001.1 45-64.Print The article was very concise in Stuart Greenes article talks about explaining the features of this how to write a research argument. particular type of essay. It was It explains how to state your easy to understand how to write opinion and the different argument one. He used step-by-step you have. Greene separates his instructions and easy to read article into multiple parts. The first examples that made it easy to part explains how to begin your understand what he was trying to paper or how to introduce your say. I dont understand how this argument. He says that you need applies to what we are doing in to figure out what sort of class. I can associate the research conversation you will be analyzing. and formulating an argument but, Greene suggests that you stick the rest of the article didnt make with a topic that you can easily much sense to me in context of research and find information and the work we are doing in class. I conversations for. Next Greene am confused as to what we are talks about how to frame you doing now. Is it like the journals paper. He says that framing helps or is it like the research Greene you name your position, described. distinguish the way you think about the world from the ways others do (Greene 149). Greene states that arguments are things we deal with daily. Certain types of arguments require more research than others. Then from these arguments we can form problems and conflicts that eventually lead to the basis of our papers.