Summary of Course Evaluation Data for Prof.

Judi Laprade
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Arts & Science University of Toronto Summary of the overall evaluation of the instructor and the learning experience
Question 11: All things considered, performs effectively as a university teacher Course Section Semester Q11
ANA300Y1Y LEC0101 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 5.9 6.0 ANA300Y1Y LEC0101 Overall average (Scale = 1 to 7):

Question 19: The value of the overall learning experience is Section

LEC0101

Q19
5.8

Semester
Summer 2011 Summer 2012

Q11
5.8 5.7

6.0

LEC0101 5.7 Overall average (Scale = 1 to 7):

5.8

Evaluation Scale Descriptors (1 to 7):

1 = extremely poor, 2 = very poor, 3 = poor, 4 = adequate, 5 = good, 6 = very good, 7 = outstanding

Evaluation Scale Descriptors (1 to 7):

1 = very low, 2 = low, 3 = below average, 4 = average, 5 = above average, 6 = high, 7 = very high

Summary of Questions: Statements about the instructor

Course ANA300 Y ANA300 Y Section LEC0101 LEC0101
Total Course Enrolment Completed Eval Forms

Semester Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Average

Q2 5.8 6.1 6.0

Q3 5.3 5.4 5.4

Q4 5.8 6.1 6.0

Q5 6.0 6.2 6.0

Q6 6.3 6.4 6.4

Q7 6.0 6.1 6.1

Q8 5.7 6.1 5.9

Q9 5.5 5.6 5.6

Q10 5.8 6.0 5.9

99 98

65 59

Summary of statements about the instructor:

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Communicates goals and requirements of the course clearly and explicitly. Uses methods of evaluation (e.g. papers, assisgnments, tests) that approproately reflect the subject matter and provide a fair evaluation of student learning. Presents material in an organized, well-planned manner. Explains concepts clearly with appropriate use of examples. Communicates enthusiasm and interest in the course material. Attends to students' questions and answers them clearly and effectively. Is available for individual consultation, by appointment or stated office hours, to students with problems relating to the course. Ensures that student work is graded fairly, with helpful comments and feedback where appropriate. Ensures that student work is graded within a reasonable time.

Evaluation Scale Descriptors (1 to 7):

1 = extrememly poor, 2 = very poor, 3 = poor, 4 = adequate, 5 = good, 6 = very good, 7 = outstanding