Seminar Midas 12 Juli 2011

Selasa, 12 Juli 2011
Advanced Finite Element Solutions for Civil Engineers

PELAKSANAAN SEMINAR MIDAS
PELAKSANAAN SEMINAR & WORKSHOP
Institut Teknologi Bandung, July 12
th
, 2011 - July 15
th
, 2011
Organized by INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
in Association with HAKI and HATTI
Sponsored by MIDAS
Seminar
Booklet
Seminar
Booklet

AGENDA SEMINAR MIDAS
Pembangunan bidang jasa konstruksi infrastruktur di Indonesia saat ini semakin pesat perkembangannya, baik dari segi perencanaan maupun teknologi konstruksinya.
Untuk mendukung perkembangan tersebut, alat bantu perangkat lunak atau software berperan besar dalam mengembangkan bidang jasa konstruksi dan mewujudkan
infrastruktur yang aman dan nyaman. Dengan demikian para pelaku di bidang jasa konstruksi dituntut untuk senantiasa mengembangkan wawasan dan kemampuannya
dalam menggunakan software yang ada. Dalam rangka mewujudkan hal tersebut, maka Fakultas Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) bekerjasama dengan
HATTI (Himpunan Ahli Teknik Tanah Indonesia), HAKI (Himpunan Ahli Konstruksi Indonesia) dan MIDAS, menyelenggarakan Seminar dan Workshop mengenai Aplikasi
Software dalam Desain dan Konstruksi Infrastruktur.
Time
08.30 ~ 09.15
Agenda Presenter
Registration
ITB / HAKI / HATTI
Mr. Sang Shim (Senior Vice President / MIDAS)
09.15 ~ 09.30 Opening Speech
09.30 ~ 10.00 MIDAS IT and Major Civil Engineering Projects
Building Engineering
10.10 ~ 10.30 Coffee Break
12.00 ~ 13.00 Break ISHOMA
10.00 ~ 10.10 Donation Ceremony from MIDAS to Faculty of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, ITB
11.00 ~ 12.00 [midas Gen] Seismic Analysis and Design using Finite
Element Analysis Solutions
13.00 ~ 13.30 MIDAS Assisted Bridge Projects: Guideway Structure for
Jakarta Monorail and Jakarta Non-Toll Elevated Road
13.30 ~ 14.30 [midas Civil] Staged Construction Analysis and Design of
Prestressed Box Girder Bridges
14.30 ~ 15.00 midas Civil Applications in Bridge Design and Construction Engineering
15.30 ~ 16.00 Applications of Finite Element Software for Geotechnical Problems
17.00 ~ 17.30 midas GTS Application in Geotechnical Engineering
16.00 ~ 17.00 [midas GTS] Implementing Advanced 3D Finite Element Solutions
for Geotechnical Engineers
17.30 ~ 18.00 Seminar Closing Ceremony
(Certificate / Survey / Celebrating Prize Winner)
15.00 ~ 15.30 Coffee Break
10.30 ~ 11.00 Problems of Modal Pushover Analysis or Nonlinear Time History
Analysis Incorporating Shear Wall Plasticity for Tall Buildings
Session 1
Bridge Engineering Session 2
Geotechnical Engineering Session 3
Prof. Bambang Budiono (ITB)
Prof. Iswandi Imran (ITB)
Prof. I Wayan Sengara (ITB)
Mr. Sudioto Susilo (PT TARUMANEGARA bumiyasa)
Ms. Hyeyeon Lee (MIDAS)
Mr. Nithil Malguri (MIDAS)
Mr. Roger Andrew Pak (MIDAS)
Dr. FX. Supartono (PT Partono Fondas)
(Bandung, July 12
th
, 2011 - July 15
th
, 2011)
Waktu dan tempat Penyelenggaraan
Hari/tanggal : Selasa, 12 Juli 2011 Tempat : Aula Barat, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesa 10, Bandung

Session 1
Building Engineering
th
, 2011 - July 15
th
, 2011

One Stop Solution for Building and General Structures
Midas Gen & Set Midas Gen & Set
Being a central distributor of leading technologies in
the world, MIDAS IT has garnered global recognition
through its continuous passion and devotion towards
the philosophy of human welfare.
MIDAS IT (MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd.) provides engineering
software development and distribution, structural engineering consulting
services and web business integrated solutions. The company was officially
incorporated in September 1, 2000, and consists of structural software
developers and professional engineers with significant practical experience.
Currently, over 300 developers and structural engineers with extensive
experience support the company. MIDAS IT also has corporate offices in the
U.S.A, China, Japan and India, and has grown to a world class company
exporting engineering software over to more than 60 countries worldwide.
MIDAS ITs vision is in becoming the world best engineering solution developer
and distributor. MIDAS ITs faith is in promoting the happier lives both for
employees and customers. MIDAS IT will relentlessly pursue to become the
world best company which propagates the excellence of Korean engineering
technologies.
About MIDAS IT
Nastran FX
NFX-Midas
midas Gen
midas Building
midas Modeler
midas DShop
midas Civil
midas FEA
midas Abutment
midas Pier
midas Deck
midas GTS 3D
midas GTS 2D
midas GeoXD midas FX+
FEPartner
(PMC in Japan)
Soil+ (CTC in Japan)
Building Eng. Civil Eng. Geotechnical Eng. Mechanical Eng.
MIDAS Family Program
midas SET
Introduction to MIDAS Family Programs ms
MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd.
5
Integrated Design System for buildings and General Structures Why midas Gen
Specialize for
Practical
Engineering Projects
Practical
7
CAD Interface
Direct Data Transfer with
Takla Structure & Revit
Structure
mdias Modeler
Automatic Generation of 3D
Structural Analysis Model
midas Gen
Integrated design system for
building and general
structures
midas Dshop
Auto-drafting module for
midas Gen
Practical
One-Stop Solution
(modeling > analysis & design >
drawing)
Onnee
(mode
drawi
1
One-Stop Solution
Usability Productivity Specialization Practical Service Reliability
8
Direct Data Transfer with
Tekla Structures, Revit
Structure
Import STAAD, MSC.Nastran,
and SAP2000
Import/Export AutoCAD DXF
Practical
Data Exchange Dat
2
Tekla Interface
Analysis & Design
midas Gen
Tekla Structure
Revit Structure
Analysis & Design
midas Gen
Revit Interface
Usability Productivity Specialization Service Reliability Practical
9
Stadiums
Power Plants
Hangar
Airport
Transmission Towers
Cranes
Pressure Vessels
Machine Structures
Underground
Structures
Practical
Diversity Div
3
Specialty Structures Applications
Usability Productivity Specialization Service Reliability
Beijing National Stadium Beijing National Aquatic Center Beijing Olympic Basketball Gymnasium
Seoul World Cup Stadium JeonJu World Cup Stadium DeaJeon World Cup Stadium
USA Pavilion China Pavilion German Pavilion
Practical
User-friendly
Interface
and Usage
Usability
11
Works Tree (Input summary
with powerful modeling
capabilities)
Task Pane which enables the
user to freely set optimal
menu system
Excel compatible tables and
multi-windows
Usability
Works Tree &
Task Pane
Wo Wo
Tas 1
Works Tree and Task Pane Excel Compatible Tables
Usability Productivity Specialization Practical Service Reliability
12
Story Related Results
Story Drift for static and
dynamic seismic loads
Story Shear for Response
Spectrum and Time History
Loads
Mass center and Stiffness
center by story
Story Shear Force Ratio for the
columns and shear walls
Torsional Irregularity Check
Stiffness Irregularity Check
Weight Irregularity Check
Capacity Irregularity Check
Define Modules for multi-tower
Info
Usability
Useful Features
St R
Use
2
Building Related Features
Building Generation / Structure Wizard Story Data and Floor Diaphragm
Story Related Results
Torsional Irregularity Story Drift
Story Mass
Story Shear Force
Define Module
13
Shear wall element
Tension only element
Beam End Release for
modeling shear connection of
steel members
Beam End Offset and Panel
Zone Effect for considering
rigid zone in the connections
of beams and columns
Node Local Axis for modeling
inclined support
Usability
Various Elements &
Boundary Conditions
Vari Vari
Bou
3
Available Element Type
Compression only
Tension only
Gap
Hook
Viscoelastic Damper
Hysteretic System
Lead Rubber Bearing Isolator
Friction Pendulum System Isolator
Cable
General Beam
Tapered Beam
Plane Stress
Plane Strain
Wall (In-plane, Out-of-plane Bending)
Plate (Thick/Thin, In-plane/Out-of-plane Thickness, Orthotropic)
Axisymmetric
Solid Element (Hexagon, Wedge, Tetrahedron)
Supports Elastic Link Linear Constraints
Point Spring Supports Nodal Coordinate System Rigid Link
General Spring Supports
Beam End Release
(Semi-rigid connection)
Diaphragm Disconnection
Surface Spring Supports Beam End Offset Panel Zone Effects
Pile Spring Supports Plate End Release
Applicable Boundary Conditions
Soil Stiffness
Fast
Modeling, Analysis,
and Design Process
Productivity
15
All-in-one analysis and design
solution for beam, column,
slab, wall, and footing
Automatic load combination
and design results
Optimal steep design and
displacement optimal design
BOM (Bill Of Materials)
Productivity
All-in-one Design
Features
AAll AAll-
Fea 1
Beam / Column Design Footing Design
Slab / Wall Design Steel Optimal Design
16
Automatic design/checking of
Concrete frame, shear wall,
Steel frame and isolated
footing
Doubly-reinforced beam
design
Steel Optimal Design based
on the strength check
Optimal design based on the
lateral displacement
Shear wall design considering
boundary element
Productivity
International
Building Code
Inte Inte
Bui 2
Available Design Code
Design Results
RC Design Steel Design SRC Design
ACI318 AISC-LRFD SSRC79
Eurocode 2, Eurocode 8 AISC-ASD JGJ138
BS8110 AISI-CFSD CECS28
IS:456 & IS:13920 Eurocode 3 AIJ-SRC
CSA-A23.3 BS5950 TWN-SRC
GB50010 IS:800 AIK-SRC
AIJ-WSD CSA-S16-01 KSSC-CFT
TWN-USD GBJ17, GB50017 Footing Design
AIK-USD, WSD AIJ-ASD ACI318
KSCE-USD TWN-ASD, LSD BS8110
KCI-USD AIK-ASD, LSD, CFSD
Slab Design KSCE-ASD
Eurocode 2 KSSC-ASD
17
Multi-Frontal Solver and latest
analysis algorithms for
accurate and practical
analysis results
Intuitive user interface,
contemporary computer
graphics and substantially
fast solver speed
Productivity
Analysis Speed Ana
3
Construction Stage Analysis Boundary Nonlinear Analysis
Pre-tension Girder Analysis Pushover Analysis
18
Blending Effect to adjust the
extent of transparency by
material types, element types
or other attributes
Work through effect to check
the model with various view
point
Dynamic views of the model
in real time
Render View in conjunction
with the dynamic views walk-
through effects
Productivity
Powerful Graphics Pow
4
Pre-Processing
Transparency Walk Through
Select Identity, Active Identity Node Information by Query Nodes
19
Various forms of Graphic
Output for examining
reactions, displacements,
member forces and stresses
Member Forces for weak and
strong axes simultaneously in
beam diagram
Iso Surface identifies the
surfaces of equal stresses in
solid elements
Top and bottom stresses of
plate elements
Productivity
Powerful Graphics Pow
4
Beam Displacement Contour Von-misesStress
Solid Displacement Contour Stress Results
Post-Processing
20
beam diagram
solid elements
plate elements
Productivity
Post-Processing
Powerful Graphics
Pos
Pow
4
Practical
21
beam diagram
solid elements
plate elements
Productivity
Post-Processing
Powerful Graphics
Pos
Pow
4
Practical
22
Generation of a report by
Drag & Drop from Report Tree
using analysis and design
results from midas program
Automatic re-generation of
the report with updates in the
model
Save a report in MS Word
format
Productivity
Dynamic Report
Generation
Dyn Dyn
Gen 5
Drag & Drop

High-end Analysis
Features
Specialization
24
Pushover Analysis
FEMA 273, Eurocode 8, Multi-
linear, Masonry & User-
defined hinge type
Base Isolators and
Dampers
Friction Pendulum System
Isolator
Viscoelastic Damper
Hysteretic System Damper
Fiber Analysis
Various type of Mass
Seismic Design
Strong Column Weak Beam
Design as per ACI318
Capacity Design as per
EN1992-1-1:04
Info
Specialization
Seismic Analysis
and Design
Sei Sei
and 1
Pushover Analysis Boundary Nonlinear Analysis
Fiber Analysis Capacity Design
25
Construction Stage Analysis
accounting for change in
geometry, supports and
loading
Time dependent material
properties of concrete such
as modulus of elasticity,
creep and shrinkage
3D Column Shortening Graph
Construction Stage
Analysis
Con Con
Ana
2
CS:1
CS:10
CS:20
CS:30
CS:70 CS:120 CS:166
Time Dependent Material Properties
CEB-FIP(1990)
CEB-FIP(1978)
ACI209(1982)
PCA(1986)
AASHTO(2006)
INDIA(IRC:18-2000)
EN1992-2:2004
User Defined
Column Shortening Graph
Specialization
26
Material Nonlinear Analysis /
Plastic Analysis
Von-Mises, Tresca, Mohr-
Coulomb & Drucker Prager
Structural Masonry Analysis
Analysis for finding Unknown
Forces by Optimization
Heat of Hydration Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis Non
3
Plastic Analysis
Large Displacement Analysis
Masonry Nonlinear Analysis
Heat of Hydration
Specialization
Midas
On Demand Service
Service
28
Official upgrade every year
Customization for each
market
New implementation of
design code, section &
material DB, and analysis
improvements upon requests
Release Note
Service
Program Pro
1
Release Note and Notice
New Implementation in the Latest Version
Pushover analysis improvement as per N2 method
General Section Check
Footing design, Combined Wall design as per EN1992-1-1:2004 .
29
Free Online Training (Twice a
month) for basic introduction
and advanced features
In-house courses with
specialized training programs
Service
Online/Offline
Training
Onl Onl
Tra 2
Online Training
Offline Training
9Regular training
9Company visit & training
9Customized training
Online training
9Basic Introduction
9Advanced Applications
9Customized Sessions
Offline Training
30
Seminar and Workshop
Web base Q & A system
Technical papers and Trouble
Shooting Guide
Service
Technical Support
and Papers
Tec Tec
and 3
Web based Q&A System
Technical Papers
Seminar
Italy SAIE conference, Oct. 2009 UK Cable br. Seminar, 2008
Singapore, Introduction seminar, 2009
Various
Project Applications
Worldwide
Reliability
32
Reliability
Various Project
Applications
Var Var
App 1
Buildings
Plant Structures
50 countries, 6500 copies
Partial List of Client
URS Corp.
Parsons Brinckerhoff
TY LIN
Ove Arup Gr.
Jacobs Engineering
RMJM
Imbsen & Associates
Michael Baker Jr.
R.W. Armstrong and Associates
Hewson Consulting Engineers Ltd
Samsung Engg. & Construction
POSCO Steel & Construction
CALTRANS (California Dept. of
Transportation)
Oregon Dept. of Transportation
Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation
US Army
33
Reliability
Various Project
Applications
Var Var
App 1
Spatial Structures
Specialty Structures
50 countries, 6500 copies
Partial List of Client
URS Corp.
Parsons Brinckerhoff
TY LIN
Ove Arup Gr.
Jacobs Engineering
RMJM
Imbsen & Associates
Michael Baker Jr.
R.W. Armstrong and Associates
Hewson Consulting Engineers Ltd
Samsung Engg. & Construction
POSCO Steel & Construction
CALTRANS (California Dept. of
Transportation)
Oregon Dept. of Transportation
Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation
US Army
34
MQC System
(midas Quality Control System)
Bug Reporting System
Reliability
QA & QC System QA
2
Bug Reporting System MQC System
Verification
Examples
Ver Ver
Exa 3
More than 100 Verification
Examples
Design Verification Examples
esupport@midasuser.com
http://en.midasuser.com/
Integrated Design System for Buildings and General Structures
1
Seismic Specific Functionality
Seismic Design for New Buildings
Seismic Design for Existing Buildings
Base Isolators and Dampers
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
03
14
20
26
26
29
31
based on Eurocode8
2
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
02
13
19
25
25
28
30
3
Seismic Design Flowchart (New Buildings)
Seismic Design Process as per Eurocode8 (New buildings)
Seismic Design
Performance Requirement
Ground Condition
Seismic Action
Combination of Seismic Action
Criteria for Structural Regularity
Seismic Analysis
Safety Verification
Capacity Design & Detailing
Seismic Zone
Representation of seismic action
[Method of Analysis]
Lateral Force method of Analysis
Modal Response Spectrum Analysis
Pushover Analysis
Inelastic Time History Analysis
4
Performance Requirement and Compliance Criteria
No-collapse
T
NCR
=475 year
W/O limitation of collapse
Damage Limitation
T
DLR
=95 year
W/O limitation of use
Compliance Criteria
Ultimate limit states
Resistance and Energy Dissipation Capacity need to be checked.
Global level verification
Overturning
Sliding
Member Level
Ductile component: Plastic Rotation
Brittle component: Resistance
Damage limitation states
Global Level: Inter-story drift
Member Level: Resistance (ULS)
Seismic Design Flowchart (New Buildings) Seismic Design
5
Ground Conditions
6
Seismic action
I II III IV
T=475 year 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Ground Acceleration
Representation of Seismic Action
a. Response Spectrum
- Horizontal elastic response spectrum
- Vertical elastic response spectrum
- Horizontal design response spectrum (Behavior factor, q, is considered.)
- Vertical design response spectrum (Behavior factor, q, is considered.)
b. Time history
[Horizontal Elastic Spectrum]
7
Load Combination of permanent loads and variable loads
100:30 Rule
(1.0Ex + 0.3Ey), (0.3Ex + 1.0Ey)
(1.0Ex + 0.3Ey + 0.3Ez ), (0.3Ex + 1.0Ey + 0.3Ez), (0.3Ex + 0.3Ey + 1.0Ez)
8
Criteria for Structural Regularity
Structural Regularity
Analysis Method
Lateral
Force
method of
Analysis
Modal
Response
Spectrum
Analysis
Pushover
Analysis
Inelastic
Time
History
Analysis
9
Safety Verification
Ultimate Limit States
Resistance condition: M
Rd
>= M
Ed
, V
Rd
>= V
Ed
Global and local ductility condition: M
Rc
>= 1.3 M
Rb
Equilibrium condition : overturning or sliding
Resistance of horizontal diaphragm
Resistance of foundations
Seismic joint condition
Damage limitation
Limitation of story drift
10
Seismic Design
Ductility Class
DCL (Low ductility)
DCM (Medium ductility)
DCH (High ductility)
Structure Type & Behavior Factor
11
Where,
M
Rb
: Beam moment resistance
M
ce
: Column member force
due to seismic load case
Capacity design values of
shear forces on beams
Capacity design shear force
in columns
Design Forces of Capacity Design (Beam/Column)
12
Design Forces of Capacity Design (Wall)
Fig. 5.3: Design envelope for bending moments in slender walls Fig. 5.4: Design envelope of the shear forces in the walls of a dual system
Wall systems Dual systems
13
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
03
14
20
26
26
29
31
14
Seismic Assessment of Buildings as per Eurocode8 (Existing buildings)
Knowledge Level
Seismic Action
Seismic Analysis
Safety Verification
Decision for Structural Intervention
Seismic Zone
Representation of seismic action
[Method of Analysis]
Lateral Force method of Analysis
Modal Response Spectrum Analysis
Pushover Analysis
Inelastic Time History Analysis
Seismic Design Flowchart (Existing Buildings) Seismic Design
15
Performance Requirement and Compliance Criteria
Near Collapse (NC) T
NCR
=2475years
Significant Damage (SD) T
NCR
=475years
Damage Limitation (DL) T
NCR
=225years
Compliance Criteria
Near Collapse (NC)
Ductile: ultimate deformation (plastic rotation)
Brittle: ultimate strength
Significant Damage (SD)
Ductile: damage-related deformation
Brittle: conservatively estimated strength
Damage Limitation (DL)
Ductile: yield strength
Brittle: yield strength
Infills: story drift
Operational
Damage
Limitation
Significant
Damage
Near
Collapse
16
Knowledge Levels
17
Pushover Analysis
Why Pushover Analysis?
a) To verify or revise the over strength ratio values (alpha_u/alpha_1)
b) To estimate the expected plastic mechanisms and the distribution of damage
c) To assess the structural performance of existing or retrofitted buildings
d) As an alternative to the design based on linear-elastic analysis which uses the
behavior factor, q
alpha_u
alpha_1
Hinge status for alpha_u Hinge status for alpha_1
Pushover
Global Control
Define Lateral
Loads
Define Hinge
Properties
Assign Hinges
Perform
Analysis
Check Pushover
Curve and
Target Disp.
Check Hinge
Status
Safety
Verification
Process in midas Gen
18
Safety Verification
19
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
03
14
20
26
26
29
31
20
Dynamics
Objectives of Seismic Isolation Systems
Enhance performance of structures at all hazard levels by:
Minimizing interruption of use of facility
Reducing damaging deformations in structural and
nonstructural components
Reducing acceleration response to minimize contents related
damage
Characteristics of Well-Designed Seismic Isolation Systems
Flexibility to increase period of vibration and thus reduce
force response
Energy dissipation to control the isolation system
displacement
Rigidity under low load levels such as wind and minor
earthquakes
21
Base Isolators and Dampers Dynamics
Base Isolators:
Friction Pendulum System Isolator
Applicable Base Isolators in midas Gen
22
[Viscoelastic Damper] [Hysteretic System Damper]
Applicable Dampers in midas Gen
23
Analysis Results (Graph & Text output)
[Hysteretic Graph of Friction pendulum system isolator]
[Hysteretic Graph of Lead rubber bearing isolator]
[Time History Graph at 1
st
story and 3
rd
story]
24
[Without Isolators]
[With Isolators]
Shear force at 1
st
story column Displacement - Frequency
Displacement - Frequency Shear force at 1
st
story column
Analysis Results (Time History Graph)
25
Mass & Damping Ratio
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
03
14
20
26
26
29
31
26
Mass
Nodal Masses
Floor Diaphragm Masses
Loads to Masses
Consistent Mass
Self-weight to Mass
[Lumped Mass and Consistent Mass]
Lumped Mass
Consistent Mass
Mass Dynamics
210 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 210 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 210 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 210 0 0 2 420
0 0 0 0 210 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 210 2
L
u
AL
I
u
Q
T U
Q
T

2 2
2 2
140 0 0 70 0 0
1
0 156 22 0 54 13
1
0 22 4 0 13 3 1
70 0 0 140 0 0 2 420
0 54 13 0 156 22 2
2
0 13 3 0 22 4
c
u
L L
L L L L AL
I
u
L L
L L L L
Q
T U
Q
T

1 2
u1 u2
1 2
1 2
27
Damping
Modal
User defines the damping ratio for each mode, and the modal
response will be calculated based on the user defined damping
ratios.
Mass & Stiffness Proportional
Damping coefficients are computed for mass proportional
damping and stiffness proportional damping.
Strain Energy Proportional
Damping ratios for each mode are automatically calculated using
the damping ratios specified for element groups and boundary
groups in Group Damping, which are used to formulate the
damping matrix.
Damping Dynamics
28
Modal Analysis
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
03
14
20
26
26
29
31
29
Modal Analysis
Eigen Vectors
Subspace Iteration
This method is effectively used when performing eigenvalue analysis for a finite element system of a large scale
(large matrix system) and commonly used among engineers.
Lanczos
Tri-diagonal Matrix is used to perform eigenvalue analysis. This method is effectively used when performing
eigenvalue analysis for lower modes.
Ritz Vectors
Unlike the natural eigenvalue modes, load dependent Ritz vectors produce more reliable results in dynamic analyses
with relatively fewer modes. The Ritz Vectors are generated reflecting the spatial distribution or the characteristics of the
dynamic loading.
Modal Analysis Dynamics
30
Fiber Analysis
Mass
Damping
Modal Analysis
Fiber Analysis
03
14
20
26
26
29
31
31
Fiber Analysis
Fiber Cell Result Plotting
Section division for Fiber Model definition
Kent & Park Model Menegotto-Pinto Model
Inelastic Material Properties (Stress-strain curve)
Fiber Analysis Dynamics
Thank You! Thank You!
One Stop Solution for Building and General Structures nd General Structures
esupport@midasuser.com
http://en.midasuser.com/
Session 2
Bridge Engineering
th
, 2011 - July 15
th
, 2011

Contents
Bridging Your Innovations to Realities
Part 1. Modeling
Graphic User Interface
Part 1. Modeling
Various model display methods
View Control + Display Options
3D Perspective Wire Frame Shrink
Transparent Shell Elements
Display of
Elements / Loads / Boundaries
Part 1. Modeling
Effective Width Calculation
Concrete Box Sections
Part 1. Modeling
Reinforcing Steel
Concrete Box Sections
Display of longitudinal rebars input
Part 1. Modeling
Section Property Calculator (SPC)
User Defined Section
Part 1. Modeling
Creep/Shrinkage
Part 1. Modeling
Compressive Strength
Part 1. Modeling
Bridge Model Wizards
Bridge Wizards
All Types of Cable Bridges
> Suspension Bridge
> Cable Stay Bridge
All Types of Segmental Bridges
> Balanced Cantilever Bridge
> Incremental Launching Method
> Movable Scaffolding System
> Full Shoring Method
Prestressed Girder, RC Slab, Box Culvert
Part 1. Modeling
Truss Model
Part 1. Modeling
Cable Stayed Bridge
Part 1. Modeling
Segmental Bridge Model Wizards based on construction method
Part 1. Modeling
RC Slab Bridge Wizard
Part 1. Modeling
RC Frame / Box Culvert Wizards
Part 1. Modeling
Grillage Model Wizard
Part 1. Modeling
3 separate data files merged into one combined model
Merge data files
Support Frame
Vessel 1
Vessels 2&3 2&3
l 1
upport Frame
Part 2. Analysis
Analysis Capabilities
Moving Load Analysis
> Influence Line & Influence Surface
Eigen Value Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
> Response Spectrum
> Time History
P - Delta Analysis
Buckling Analysis
Thermal Stress Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
> Material & Geometric Nonlinearity
> Pushover & Fiber Model Analysis
> Inelastic Time History Analysis
> Boundary Nonlinear Analysis
Part 1. Modeling
Defining Live Loads
Live Load Analysis
Step 1
Select Live Load Code
Step 2
Define Traffic Line Lane
or
Traffic Surface Lane
Step 3
Define Standard Vehicular Load
or
User-defined Vehicular Load
Part 2. Analysis
Live Load Analysis
Influence Line Results
Part 2. Analysis
Live Load Analysis
Moving Load Tracer + Vehicle Load Conversion to Static Load
Part 1. Modeling
Transverse Analysis for Multi-Celled Box Sections
Transverse Analysis
Part 2. Analysis
Prestressed Concrete Tendon Prestress Losses & Stress Limits
Part 2. Analysis
Balanced-Cantilever Bridge Geometry (Camber) Control, Table and Graph
Part 2. Analysis
Cable-Stayed Bridge Finding Unknown Load Factors for Optimization
Definition of Unknown Load Factors
Completed Structure Model
Part 2. Analysis
Cable-Stayed Bridge Forward stage analysis
Displacements at the completed state
[ Max. 0.00043 ]
Displacements of forward stage analysis at
the last stage using Lack of Fit Force
[ Max. 0.000426 ]
Construction stage pretension force
= Initial pretension force + Lack of Fit Force (additional tension required to install a cable)
Part 2. Analysis
Cable Tuning
Cable-Stayed Bridge Cable tuning for finer adjustments
Part 2. Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Time History Analysis Displacement & Moment
Part 2. Analysis
Dynamic Analysis
Time History Analysis Shear vs Displacement Graph
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Dynamic Boundary Nonlinear Analysis Bearings & Isolators ry Nonlinear Analysis Bearings & Isolators
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Dynamic Boundary Nonlinear Analysis Bridge behavior with the base isolators
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Pushover Analysis Performance Based Seismic Design
Select Load or Displacement Control
Define Inelastic Hinge Properties
Pushover Analysis
Review Capacity of Structure
Performance Point by CSM
Evaluation of Structure to Resist Earthquake
Static Analysis and Member Design
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Pushover Analysis Capacity Curves
Yield Point
Maximum Capacity
Node 2
Node 3
Node 4
Node 5
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Pushover Analysis Evaluation of Structure by Design Spectrum
Performance Point
Part 1. Modeling
General Section Design
General Sections
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Material Nonlinear Analysis
Truss
Element types
Plane Stress
Plane Strain
Axisymmetric
Solid
Tresca
Plastic Material Models
Von Mises
Mohr-Coulomb
Drucker-Prager
Isotropic
Hardening Models
Kinematic
Mixed
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Nonlinear / Inelastic Time History Analysis
Kinematic Hardening Clough
Takeda Modified Taketa
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Inelastic Time History Analysis results
0.27
0.23
0.16
0.28
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Nonlinear dynamic analysis using Fiber Model
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Nonlinear dynamic analysis using Fiber Model Defining hysteretic model of concrete
Kent & Park Model
Japan Concrete
Standard
Specification Model
Japanese Roadway
Specification Model
Trilinear Concrete
Model
Part 2. Analysis
Nonlinear Analysis
Nonlinear dynamic analysis using Fiber Model
Part 2. Analysis
Temperature Contour with / without Cooling Pipes
Without Cooling Pipes With Cooling Pipes
Part 2. Analysis
Post-processing Features
Plate Moments Cutting Diagrams
Part 2. Analysis
Post-processing Features
Solid Stresses Iso Surface
Part 3. Design
PSC Design
PSC Design as per AASHTO LRFD08
Part 3. Design
Bridge Load Rating Design
Bridge Load Rating Design as per AASHTO LRFR Permit Vehicle & Moving Load Case
Lane 1
Lane 2
La LL ne 1
Lane 2
Permit
Vehicle
Part 3. Design
Reinforced Concrete Design
Reinforced Concrete Design as per AASHTO LRFD Design Report
Part 1. Modeling
Dynamic Report Generator
Dynamic Report Generator
y p
[ Composite Girder Bridge ]
[ Arch Bridge ]
[ Post-tensioned Box Girder Bridge ]
[ Suspension Bridge ]
[ Cable-stayed Bridge ]
Market Leader Worldwide
Applied to Major Projects
Ironton-Russell Bridge
Overall bridge length 1,900 ft
Main span 950 ft
Tower height 519 ft
Location
Crossing the Ohio River
between Ironton and Russell
Function/usage Roadway Bridge
Designer Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.
Cost of construction $110 Million
Number of elements
and element types
used
Truss (Cable): 70
Beam: 2088
Shell: 2730
Type of analysis
with Time-Dependent Effects
Unknown Load Factor Analysis
Eigenvalue Analysis
Thermal Analysis
Vehicle Load Optimization
Ironton-Russell Bridge
Overall
Main sp
Tower
Locatio
Functio
Design
Cost of
Numbe
and ele
used
Type o
Ironton Russell Bridge
Galena Creek Bridge
Overall bridge length 525 m
Main Span 210 m
Location Washoe County, Nevada
Modeled by Hilliard C. Bond, P.E. (of Parsons)
Number of elements
and element types used
Beam: 400
Tendon Profile: 10
(lumped representative tendons)
Type of analysis
Construction Stage Analysis with
Time-Dependent Effects
Overall bridge length
Main Span
Location
Function/usage
Modeled by
Number of elements
and element types use
Bang Hwa Bridge
Location Seoul
Designer Sam An Engineering
Year of completion 2000
Cost of construction $ 0.2 Billion
Number of elements
and element types
used
Beam: 2603
Type of analysis
Response Spectrum Analysis
Overall bri
Location
Function/u
Designer
Year of co
Cost of co
Number of
and eleme
used
Type of an
KumGa Bridge 7 Spans of Extradosed bridge
Location Chung Ju
Designer Chung Suk Engineering
Number of elements and
element types used
Truss (Cable): 144
Beam: 644
Type of analysis
with Time-Dependent Effects
Cable Tension Optimization
Geometric Nonlinear Analysis
95 m
hung Ju
oadway
hung Su
uss (Ca
eam: 64
onstruct
th Time
able Ten
eometric
ehicle Lo
Overall bridge length 79
Location Ch
Function/usage Ro
Designer Ch
element types used
Tru
Be
Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Tyyy Ty Ty Ty Tyy Ty Ty Ty Ty Tyy Ty Tyyyyyyyy Tyyyyyyy Ty TTTy Ty Tyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Tyyyyyyyyyyyype ppppe pe pe pe pe pe pe peeeeeeeee pe pe ppe ppppe pe pe ppe pe pe pe pe pee pee pe ppe pe pe peee pe pppeeee ppe ppeeeee pe pppe peeee pppppe peee pppppee pppppeee ppppppe pppppeee ppppppe ppeeee pppppppe pppppppppee ppppe ppe pppppe ppppppppe ppppe ppppppppppppppppee ppppppppe pppppppppppppppppppppp oooo oooooof f an a alysis
Co
wit
Ca
Ge
Ve
Tower height 107 m
Location Incheon
Function/usage Roadway / Railway Bridge
Designer U Sin Corporation
element types used
Truss (Cable): 162
Beam: 1930
Type of analysis
Response Spectrum
Analysis
Large Displacement
Analysis
Young Jong Bridge Worlds 1
st
3D self-anchored suspension bridge
4420 m
10
all bridg
er heigh
tion
ction/usa
gner
of com
of cons
ber of e
ent type
of anal
Young Jong Bridge World s 1
st
3D self- ff anchored suspension
Overa
Towe
Locat
Func
Desig
Year
Cost
Numb
eleme
Ty Type
g g g p
Main span 800 m
Tower height 230 m
Location Incheon
Designer
Seoyeong Engineering and Chodai
Co., Ltd
element types used
Truss (Cable): 176
Beam: 1653
Type of analysis
Incheon 2
nd
Bridge 5
th
Longest Cable Stayed Bridge
m bridge le
an
eight
n
n/usage
r
complet
construc
of elem
types u
analysis
Incheon 2
nd
Bridge 5
th
Overall b
Main spa
Tower he
Location
Function
Designe
Year of c
Cost of c
Number
element
Ty Ty y Ty TTTTT pe p of a
g g y g
Main span 1018 m
Tower height 295 m
Location
Between Tsing Yi and Kowloon
City, Hong Kong, China
Designer Ove Arup & Partners
Number of elements
Truss (Cable): 224
Beam: 1638
Type of analysis
Eigenvalue Analysis
Thermal Analysis
Buckling Analysis
Stonecutters Bridge 2
nd
m
m
bridge l
an
eight
n
n/usage
er
constru
r of elem
ment typ
an an an ann aaaaaa al a ysi
Overall b
Main spa
Tower h
Location
Function
Designe
Cost of c
Number
and elem
Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Tyyy Ty Tyype pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe pe peeeeee ppp o ooooooooooooooooooooooo ooofffffffff f f f ffff
Main span 1088 m
Tower height 306 m
Location
Crossing Yangtze River in China
between Nantong and Changshu
Designer
Jiangsu Province
Communications Planning and
Design Institute
Number of elements
and element types
used
Truss (Cable): 272
Beam: 760
Type of analysis
Eigenvalue Analysis
Thermal Analysis
Buckling Analysis
Sutong Bridge Longest Cable Stayed Bridge
m
m
ge leng
ht
age
struction
element
t types
llys ysis
Sutong Bridge Longest Cable Stayed Bridge
Overall bridg
Main span
Tower heigh
Location
Function/us
Designer
Cost of cons
Number of e
an a d element
us s uu ed e
Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty Ty TTy Ty ype pe pe pe pe pe pe pe oooof ffffff fffffffff fff an an aan an an annn an an an aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa
g g

1)
This paper is presented in the Midas Seminar at ITB Bandung, 12 J uly 2011.
2)
Director of PT. Partono Fondas Eng Consultant, Associate Professor of UI & Untar.
3)
Structure Engineers of PT. Partono Fondas Eng Consultant.
PENGGUNAAN MIDAS CIVIL PADA PERENCANAAN DAN
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING UNTUK JEMBATAN BETON
1)

FX Supartono
2)
Sin Hok Taruna
3)
Darwin Chandra
3)

Bong Yoki Tjung
3)

J onathan Sandjaja
3)

ABSTRAK

Makalah ini menyampaikan penggunaan software Midas Civil 2010 pada perencanaan dan
construction engineering untuk beberapa jembatan beton di Indonesia. Tiga contoh aplikasi
diberikan untuk jembatan beton tipe pelengkung ganda, jembatan beton tipe balance cantilever,
dan jembatan beton tipe cable stayed. Contoh jembatan pertama dilakukan untuk perencanaan,
contoh jembatan kedua untuk independent proof check, dan contoh jembatan ketiga dilakukan
untuk construction engineering. Pada bagian akhir makalah, disampaikan kesan dari penggunaan
software Midas Civil dalam mengerjakan analisis dan perencanaan jembatan tersebut di atas.

KATA KUNCI: jembatan pelengkung, jembatan balance cantilever, jembatan cable stayed.

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the Midas Civil 2010 application on the design and construction engineering of
various concrete bridges in Indonesia. Three application examples have been presented, i.e. for
the multiple arch concrete bridge, balance cantilever concrete bridge, and cable stayed concrete
bridge. The first example is concerning the design work; second example is for the independent
proof checking work; while the third example has the purpose for construction engineering and
deflection control during construction. Remarks are presented at the end of this paper as
impressions in using this software for the bridge design and engineering works.

KEY WORDS: arch bridge, balance cantilever bridge, cable stayed bridge.

1. PENDAHULUAN

Perencanaan jembatan harus didasarkan pada suatu prosedur yang memberikan
jaminan kelayakan pada berbagai aspek, yaitu antara lain:
a. Keamanan dan stabilitas struktur
b. Kenyamanan bagi pengguna jembatan
c. Ekonomis
d. Durabilitas (keawetan dan kelayakan jangka panjang)
e. Kemudahan pemeliharaan
f. Estetika
g. Dampak lingkungan pada tingkat yang wajar dan cenderung minimal.

Dari berbagai kriteria perencanaan tersebut di atas, kriteria keamanan dan stabilitas
struktur menempati urutan pertama.
2
Untuk struktur-struktur jembatan dengan bentuk geometris dan pola struktur yang
rumit, yang biasanya disebut sebagai jembatan tipe khusus, perencanaan harus
dilakukan dengan lebih mendalam yang ditinjau dari berbagai aspek, baik statik dan
dinamik (pada kondisi struktur hiperstatik), maupun juga akibat beban-beban khusus
seperti temperatur, rangkak dan susut beton, aero-dinamik, gempa dan lain
sebagainya, yang pada umumnya merupakan beban-beban non-linier.

Di samping masalah pembebanan yang rumit, jembatan tipe khusus seperti balance
cantilever, cable stayed, perencanaannya tidak dapat hanya dilakukan pada kondisi
jembatan jadi, melainkan juga harus memperhitungkan tahapan konstruksi
(construction stage), yang rekam jejak tegangan dan deformasinya perlu
dikombinasikan dengan kondisi tegangan dan deformasi setelah jembatan jadi
akibat beban lalu lintas dan beban-beban khusus lainnya. Hal ini lebih diperumit lagi
bahwa beban temperatur dan rangkak/susut beton sudah muncul pada construction
stage.

Semua kerumitan di atas mengakibatkan bahwa perencanaan jembatan-jembatan
tipe khusus tersebut hampir tidak mungkin dilakukan secara manual lagi, sehingga
diperlukan dukungan suatu software (program) yang canggih dan dapat dipercaya
keandalannya.

Midas Civil 2010 dipilih karena mempunyai berbagai fitur untuk analisis yang bisa
menjawab kerumitan analisis struktur dengan proses input yang relatif mudah. Untuk
jembatan berbentang panjang seperti jembatan cable stayed dan jembatan gantung,
Midas Civil mempunyai pula wizard yang cukup canggih dalam membantu proses
analisis dan perencanaan yang rumit dengan derajat ketidak-tentuan statik yang
sangat tinggi.

Di dalam makalah ini akan disampaikan tiga contoh aplikasi Midas Civil 2010 untuk:
1. Perencanaan jembatan beton tipe pelengkung di Teluk Balikpapan (optimasi
Kontraktor).
2. Proof checking jembatan beton tipe balance cantilever berbentang panjang di
Bekasi.
3. Construction engineering untuk jembatan beton tipe cable stayed di Manado.

2. JEMBATAN BETON TIPE PELENGKUNG GANDA

2.1. Gambaran Umum

J embatan ini merupakan jembatan beton tipe pelengkung ganda yang menunjang
lantai kendaraan melalui kolom-kolom beton, dengan karakteristik geometris dan
mutu beton sebagai berikut:
Panjang total jembatan : 430 meter
J umlah bentang : 3 bentang +2 x setengah bentang (tepi)
J umlah jalur/lajur lalu lintas : 2 jalur x 1 lajur untuk 2 arah +lajur sepeda
motor untuk masing-masing arah
Mutu beton : fc =40 MPa
Modulus elastisitas beton (E) : ' f 4700
C
=29725 MPa
Poisson ratio beton () : 0,20

Modulus
Koefisien
geser beto

n muai pana
n (G)
as beton
:
( ) + 1 2
E
: 1110
-6
/

G
a
m
b
a
r
2
.
1
.
T
a
m
p
a
k
m
e
m
a
n
j
a
n
g
j
e
m
b
a
t
a
n
p
e
l
e
n
g
k
u
n
g
b
e
t
o
n
[
s
a
t
u
a
n
p
a
n
j
a
n
g
:
m
m
]
=12385 M
/C
MPa
3
G
a
m
b
a
r
2
.
2
.
P
o
t
o
n
g
a
n
m
e
l
i
n
t
a
n
g
j
e
m
b
a
t
a
n
p
e
l
e
n
g
k
u
n
g
b
e
t
o
n
[
s
a
t
u
a
n
p
a
n
j
a
n
g
:
m
m
]
2.2. Modelisasi Midas Civil

Gambar. 2.3. Modelisasi struktur jembatan pelengkung dengan Midas Civil

Gambar. 2.4. Modelisasi hubungan deck jembatan dan kolom

Struktur jembatan secara keseluruhan dimodelkan sebagai elemen-elemen hingga, di
mana pilar (kolom) utama, kolom di atas pelengkung, balok pelengkung dan balok
penghubung (cross beam) dimodelkan sebagai beton bertulang (reinforced concrete),
sedangkan elemen dek jembatan dimodelkan sebagai beton prategang (prestressed
concrete, PSC).

Tulangan non-prategang maupun kabel prategang ikut dimodelkan (diikutsertakan
dalam pemodelan). Tulangan non-prategang yang berupa tulangan lentur dan geser
ikut dimodelkan pada setiap elemen beton bertulang (reinforced concrete) maupun
pada beton prategang (prestressed concrete), sedangkan kabel prategang
dimodelkan sebagai tendon-tendon pada dek jembatan dalam arah longitudinal dan
transversal.

Pada side span, hubungan antara kolom di atas pelengkung dan dek jembatan dibuat
rigid (kaku). Sedangkan pada main span kami modelkan dengan menggunakan cross
beam (balok penghubung) di antara kolom di atas pelengkung pada arah transversal.
Selain itu terdapat elastomeric bearing yang menghubungkan kolom di atas
pelengkung dengan dek jembatan. Elastomeric bearing tersebut dimodelkan sebagai
pegas multi direction.

Modelisasi side span dan main span dari struktur jembatan dapat dilihat pada
gambar-gambar berikut ini.

G
Gamba
Gamba
Gambar 2.7
ar 2.5. Mode
r 2.6. Mode
7. Modelisas

elisasi side

elisasi main

si main spa

span yang
span deng
an dengan e
dibuat mon
an cross be
elastomeric

nolit
eam
bearing
5

6
Moving load yang dimodelkan dalam perencanaan struktur ini dilakukan sesuai
dengan standar AASHTO. Penentuan letak moving load untuk menghasilkan gaya
dalam maksimum dapat secara otomatis ditentukan oleh Midas Civil 2010.

Gambar 2.8. Modelisasi beban truk

Gambar 2.9. Modelisasi BTR dan BGT

7
2.3. Analisis Dinamika Struktur
Analisis dinamik dilakukan khususnya untuk menganalisis respons struktur terhadap

gempa. Dalam modelisasi struktur jembatan, elastomeric bearing dimodelkan dengan
sistem multi direction movement.

Di bawah ini adalah hasil analisis dinamik dengan menggunakan Midas Civil 2010,
ditunjukkan dalam ragam getar Mode 1 sampai dengan Mode 8.

Gambar 2.10.a. Mode 1 Gambar 2.10.b. Mode 2

Gambar 2.10.c. Mode 3

Gambar 2.10.d. Mode 4

8

Gambar 2.10.e. Mode 5

Gambar 2.10.f. Mode 6

Gambar 2.10.g. Mode 7

Gambar 2.10.h. Mode 8

B
d
2

2.4. Conto
Berdasarka
diperoleh di
G
2.4.1. Has
A
oh Hasil An
n hasil an
agram tega
Ga
Gam
Gambar 2.13
il Teganga
Arah Longitu
Gambar
Gambar
nalisis Dek
nalisis den
angan sebag
mbar 2.11.
mbar 2.12. P
3. Posisi teg
n pada Ko
udinal
r 2.14.a. Te
r 2.14.b. Te
Jembatan
ngan meng
gai berikut.

Potongan m

Potongan m

gangan yan

ndisi Trans

gangan kon

gangan kon
ggunakan
memanjang
melintang de
g dianalisis
sfer

ndisi transfe
ndisi transfe
program M
g jembatan
ek jembatan
s pada dek j
er pada pos
er pada pos
Midas Civi
n
jembatan
sisi 1
sisi 3
9
l 2010,

10
Arah Transversal

Gambar 2.15.a. Tegangan kondisi transfer pada posisi 1

Gambar 2.15.b. Tegangan kondisi transfer pada posisi 3

2.4.2. Hasil Tegangan pada Kondisi Service

Arah Longitudinal

Gambar 2.16.a. Tegangan kondisi service pada posisi 1

Gambar 2.16.b. Tegangan kondisi service pada posisi 3

Arah Transversal

Gambar 2.17.a. Tegangan kondisi service pada posisi 1

Gambar 2.17.b. Tegangan kondisi service pada posisi 3

11
2.5. Contoh Hasil Analisis Balok Pelengkung

Hasil analisis pada balok pelengkung dapat dilihat pada calculation sheet di bawah
ini:

12

2.6. Contoh Hasil Analisis Pilar Utama

Hasil analisis pada pilar (kolom) utama dapat dilihat pada calculation sheet di bawah
ini:

13

3. JEMBATAN BETON TIPE BALANCE CANTILEVER

3.1. Gambaran Umum

J embatan ini merupakan jembatan beton dengan metode konstruksi Balance
Cantilever, dengan karakteristik geometris dan mutu beton sebagai berikut:

Panjang total jembatan : 644 meter

J umlah bentang : 12 bentang terdiri dari:
4 bentang untuk jembatan pendekat kiri (struktur
I-girder)
3 bentang untuk jembatan utama (struktur
Balance Cantilever)
5 bentang untuk jembatan pendekat kanan
(struktur I-girder)

Panjang bentang utama : 130 meter

J umlah jalur dan lajur lalu lintas : 2 jalur x 2 lajur untuk 2 arah

Mutu beton (fc) : 50 MPa (Girder)
40 MPa (Deck Slab)
35 MPa (Pier)
30 MPa (Abutment, Pile Cap, Bore Pile,
Parapet & Retaining Wall)

Modulus elastisitas (E) : ' f 4700
C

: 33234 MPa (Girder)
29725 MPa (Deck Slab)
27806 MPa (Pier)

Poisson ratio beton () : 0,20
Modulus geser (G) :
( ) + 1 2
E

: 13848 MPa (Girder)
12386 MPa (Deck Slab)
11586 MPa (Pier)

Berat jenis : 25 kN/m
3

Koefisien muai panas beton : 1110
-6
/C

Karena keterbatasan halaman, di dalam makalah ini hanya akan dijelaskan mengenai
jembatan utama saja.

14

8 0 0
4
%
4
%
3 2 0
8 0 0
3 2 0
3 2 0
S
S
F
B
1
6
0

E
x
p
a
n
s
io
n

J
o
in
t
S
S
F
B
1
6
0

E
x
p
a
n
s
io
n

J
o
in
t
N
e
o
p
r
e
n
e

J
o
in
t
N
e
o
p
r
e
n
e

J
o
in
t
G
a
m
b
a
r

3
.
1
.

P
o
t
o
n
g
a
n

m
e
m
a
n
j
a
n
g

j
e
m
b
a
t
a
n

15
3.2. Modelisasi Midas Civil

Gambar 3.2. Model 2D memanjang jembatan

Gambar. 3.3. Model 3D memanjang jembatan

Gambar 3.4. Model melintang gelagar box jembatan

Karena struktur yang ditinjau menggunakan metode konstruksi Balance Cantilever,
maka perlu dibuat tahapan-tahapan konstruksi (construction stage). Analisis tahapan
konstruksi ini penting dalam menentukan perilaku rekam jejak tegangan dan
deformasi setiap segmen jembatan dari masa konstruksi segmental hingga masa
layan. Tanpa memperhitungkan tegangan dan deformasi struktur jembatan dari masa
konstruksi, hasil akhir analisis struktur dapat menjadi sangat berbeda (salah). Dalam
contoh ini, tahapan konstruksi telah dianalisis dengan menggunakan pemodelan
seperti di bawah ini (tahapan ditampilkan di sini mulai Stage 2 setelah Stage 1 yang
merupakan tahap konstruksi pilar tepi dan pilar tengah).

Gambar. 3.5.a. Stage 2 J embatan Utama

16

Gambar. 3.5.b. Stage 4 J embatan Utama

Gambar. 3.5.c. Stage 7 J embatan Utama

Gambar. 3.5.d. Stage 10 J embatan Utama

Gambar. 3.5.e. Stage 13 J embatan Utama

Gambar. 3.5.f. Stage 16 J embatan Utama

17

Gambar. 3.5.g. Stage 20 J embatan Utama (jembatan jadi)

3.3. Analisis Dinamika Struktur

Analisis dinamik yang ditampilkan di sini hanya meliputi analisis respons struktur
terhadap gempa untuk J embatan Utama, yang dapat dilihat pada 5 ragam getar di
bawah ini.

Gambar 3.6.a. Mode 1

Gambar 3.6.b. Mode 2

18

Gambar 3.6.c. Mode 3

Gambar 3.6.d. Mode 4

Gambar 3.6.e. Mode 5

3.4. Contoh Hasil Analisis Jembatan Utama
Analisis struktur dilakukan dengan menggunakan program Midas Civil 2010.

Gambar 3.7. Model memanjang jembatan

19

Gambar 3.8. Potongan melintang gelagar box jembatan

Gambar 3.9. Posisi tegangan yang dianalisis pada box jembatan

Kondisi tahapan kontruksi

Stage 19. Kondisi tegangan saat transfer prategang pada segmen sebelum
closure.

Gambar 3.10.a. Tegangan saat transfer di posisi 1

Gambar 3.10.b. Tegangan saat transfer di posisi 3

Stage 20. Kondisi tegangan saat transfer prategang setelah closure.

Gambar 3.11.a. Tegangan saat transfer di posisi 1

Gambar 3.11.b. Tegangan saat transfer di posisi 3

Stage 21. Kondisi tegangan setelah terjadi susut dan rangkak selama 3 tahun.

Gambar 3.12.a. Tegangan di posisi 1

Gambar 3.12.b. Tegangan di posisi 3

20

Gambar 3.12.c. Tegangan di posisi 1

Gambar 3.12.d. Tegangan di posisi 3

Kondisi service

Gambar 3.13. Tegangan pada kondisi service di posisi 3

21
Kondisi ultimate

Gambar 3.14.a. Kapasitas momen lentur ultimate

Gambar 3.14.b. Kapasitas gaya geser ultimate

22
3.5. Contoh Hasil Analisis Pilar Jembatan Utama

Hasil analisis pada pilar utama dapat dilihat pada calculation sheet di bawah ini:

23
4. JEMBATAN BETON TIPE CABLE STAYED

4.1. Gambaran Umum

J embatan ini merupakan jembatan cable stayed dengan susunan bentang 30m +
36m + 36m + 120m + 120m + 30m, yang bentang utamanya (main bridge)
menggunakan tipe box girder, dan dengan pylon tipe vase (vas bunga). Tinggi total
pylon adalah 62,8m, dan elevasi tinggi dek jembatan adalah +47,0m.

Gambar 4.1. Modelisasi struktur jembatan cable stayed dengan Midas Civil

Karena lingkup pekerjaan kami di dalam pekerjaan ini adalah Construction
Engineering & Deflection Control, jadi di dalam makalah ini kami hanya akan
menyajikan pemodelan struktur jembatan dalam tahapan construction stage saja.

4.2. Pemodelan struktur dalam tahapan konstruksi

Di bawah ini adalah modelisasi struktur pada tahapan konstruksi berdasarkan gambar
rencana struktur jembatan, mulai dari pylon sampai dengan closure pada dek
jembatan. Namun karena keterbatasan halaman, tidak semua tahap konstruksi kami
tampilkan di sini.

Gambar 4.2. Pengecoran Segmen 1 Gambar 4.3. Pengecoran Segmen 3
24

Gambar 4.5. Pengecoran Segmen 4 Gambar 4.4. Pemasangan Temporary Tension
Member antara segmen 2 dan 3
Gambar 4.9. Pengecoran Pier Table Gambar 4.8. Pengecoran Lower Cross Beam
berikut dengan prestressing
Gambar 4.11. Pemasangan Temporary
Compression Member
(Strutting Member)
Gambar 4.10. Pengecoran Segmen 9
25

Gambar 4.15. Pengecoran Middle Cross
Beam dengan prestressing
Gambar 4.14. Pengecoran Segmen 15
Gambar 4.17. Pelepasan Tension &
Strutting Member
Gambar 4.16. Pengecoran Upper
Cross Beam
26

Gambar 4.18. Pengecoran Approach Span 1 kiri

Gambar 4.19. Pengecoran Approach Span 2 kiri

Gambar 4.20. Pengecoran Approach Span 3 kiri dan Approach kanan
27

Gambar 4.21. Pengecoran Segmen 1 dek jembatan

Gambar 4.22. Pemasangan dan penarikan Kabel 1


28




29


Gambar 4.29. Pengecoran Closure kiri dan Kanan

Gambar 4.30. J embatan jadi dan pelepasan Traveler
30
5. CATATAN AKHIR

Dalam aplikasi Midas Civil 2010 untuk analisis, verifikasi, dan perencanaan struktur
jembatan tipe khusus yang seperti disebutkan di atas, telah diperoleh beberapa
kesan sebagai berikut:

Keunggulan:

Input data pemodelan struktur, penampang elemen, dan konfigurasi tendon
prategang dapat dimodelkan di dalam gambar Autocad untuk selanjutnya dapat
diimport ke dalam Midas Civil.
Salah satu cara input modelisasi Midas Civil berbasiskan bentuk tabel, sehingga
dapat menggunakan Micosoft Excel sebagai lembar kerja yang kemudian diimport
ke dalam pemodelan Midas Civil.
Dengan adanya fitur tree menu, input data pemodelan struktur yang telah
dikerjakan dapat diperiksa kembali, sehingga pemodelan struktur dapat lebih
terorganisir dan menghindari kemungkinan terjadi kesalahan di dalam pemodelan
struktur.
Dengan adanya fitur moving load, beban kendaraan dapat dimodelkan sebagai
beban bergerak sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku sehingga bisa diperoleh
konfigurasi beban kendaraan yang paling maksimum.
Fitur construction stage Midas Civil telah memudahkan analisis pada tahap
konstruksi, termasuk analisis pengaruh beban temperatur, susut dan rangkak
beton selama masa konstruksi, yang dinilai penting dalam menentukan perilaku
rekam jejak tegangan dan deformasi struktur jembatan hingga masa layan.

Keterbatasan (hanya sebatas pengalaman kami dalam menggunakan Midas Civil):

Tidak memiliki model elemen tipe shell.
Tidak dapat menampilkan kontur tegangan secara kontinyu dalam suatu
penampang memanjang maupun melintang.

Namun demikian, secara umum dapat dicatat bahwa dengan adanya fitur structure
wizard yang cukup banyak dan variatif, pemodelan struktur dengan menggunakan
Midas Civil terasa cukup mudah dan nyaman, dengan hasil yang cukup reliable,
khususnya untuk perencanaan dan verifikasi keandalan struktur jembatan, serta juga
untuk construction engineering & deflection control struktur jembatan tipe khusus
yang rumit.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Midas Civil On-line Manual.
2. Midas Civil Analysis Reference.
3. PT. Partono Fondas: Laporan J embatan Pelengkung Teluk Balikpapan (Optimasi Kontraktor),
J anuari 2011.
4. PT. Partono Fondas: Laporan Independent Proof Check J embatan Balance Cantilever di
Bekasi, Mei 2011.
5. PT. Partono Fondas: Laporan Pendahuluan Construction Engineering & Deflection Control
J embatan Cable Stayed di Manado, Oktober 2010.
Session 3
Geotechnical Engineering
th
, 2011 - July 15
th
, 2011
2 / 80
Product Overview
About midas GTS
Application Areas
Why midas GTS?
Latest Enhancements
Analysis
Analysis Types
Material Models & Element Library
System Equation Solver
Post-processing
Modelling
Geometry Modelling
Mesh Generation
Modelling Wizard
QA & QC
Introduction to midas GTS
About midas GTS
Application Areas
Why midas GTS?
Latest Enhancements
Product Overview
Geotechnical & Tunnel analysis System
About midas GTS
4 / 80
Next Generation Solution for Geotechnical and Tunnel Engineering
midas GTS is all-in-one FE analysis software dedicated to geotechnical engineering. midas GTS provides a new paradigm for
intuitive modeling, superb analysis capabilities and speed, visualization of modeling and results, and practical
summarization of results. Such unprecedented analysis environment will surely satisfy the needs of the demanding users.
About midas GTS
Application Areas
Why midas GTS?
Latest Enhancements
Product Overview
Application Areas
6 / 80
Application Areas
7 / 80
About midas GTS
Application Areas
Why midas GTS?
Latest Enhancements
Product Overview
Why midas GTS?
9 / 80
Why midas GTS?
10 / 80
Can complex 3D geometry models be considered?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, all the essential modeling
tools are available.
midas GTS offers Intuitive GUI
Environment which allows for
creation of complex geometry in the
least amount of steps based on CAD
formats.
Different element types (e.g.
embedded truss, beam, plate,
interface and solid elements)
including structural elements can be
composed in one model file.
Why midas GTS?
11 / 80
Can different pile diameters and pile group behavior be modeled and analyzed?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, midas GTS can consider it using beam elements.
Existence of super pile elements to model large scale piled raft foundation systems based on embedded
element techniques and considering full soil structure interaction effects.
Why midas GTS?
12 / 80
Can complex 3D Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) be simulated?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, various types of interface elements for SSI are provided.
Existence of various types of interface elements to simulate soil-structure interaction regardless of
geometry complexity and interface position.
- Soil-pile friction captured by nonlinear interface behavior
- Pile group interaction captured by full 3D modeling
Why midas GTS?
13 / 80
Can unconventional Tunnel Intersections be modeled?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, tunnels with unconventional connection galleries can be modeled with the
essential tools provided.
All types of T-type/Y-type
interconnections, curved tunnels,
shaft-lateral-main tunnel
connections, tunnel entrances,
even subway stations can be easily
modeled in detail.
Why midas GTS?
14 / 80
Can Shield TBM be modeled?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, TBM modeling, considering excavation sequences, is available.
Automated and realistic construction
stage definition for sequential
activation and deactivation of
excavation segments, structural parts,
loads and boundary conditions.
Why midas GTS?
15 / 80
Is Staged Excavation supported in midas GTS?
Why midas G
Is S Is
Yes, midas GTS supports 3D excavation and dedicated tools.
Simulate 3D excavation in real
time construction sequence
Including dewatering procedure.
Structural support systems
including anchors and diaphragm
walls can be generated
automatically.
Why midas GTS?
16 / 80
Can Groundwater Flow be considered in midas GTS?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, various hydraulic boundary
conditions are available to consider
groundwater flow behavior.
Stress-seepage semi-coupled
analysis & expanded
application of Darcys law
(saturated / unsaturated) are
considered in midas GTS.
Furthermore, a detailed terrain
geometry can be modeled
based on built-in tool TGM
(Terrain Geometry Maker) to
incorporate digital maps into
the model.
Why midas GTS?
17 / 80
Can Dynamic Analysis be performed in midas GTS?
Why midas G
Can C
Yes, 3D Dynamic Analysis is available with integrated seismic wave database.
Dynamic analysis can be performed for 1D, 2D and 3D models including built in 1D and 2D equivalent
linear dynamic analysis features.
Why midas GTS?
18 / 80
Does midas GTS support 64 bit O/S?
Why midas G
Do D
Yes, midas GTS supports 64-bit OS & multi-core parallel system.
GTS offers a robust and
advanced kernel - supporting
64-bit OS & multi-core
parallel system in nonlinear,
construction-stage and
seepage analysis
Why midas GTS?
19 / 80
Are there any training programs or technical documents regarding midas GTS?
Why midas G
Are A
Yes, MIDAS provides FREE online seminars and training programs in addition to an
extensive tutorial database. Both MIDAS and partner companies provide local
events such as user conferences, seminars, and on-site training programs.
Why midas GTS?
20 / 80
How does MIDAS provide technical support?
Why midas G
How H
There are over four branch offices and 24 partners world wide, including MIDAS
Support & Development, who are qualified and ready to provide dedicated technical
support via e-mail, phone and remote assistance.
About midas GTS
Application Areas
Why midas GTS?
Latest Enhancements
Product Overview
Latest Enhancements
22 / 80
Modified Mohr-Coulomb
Soils vary greatly in composition and in mechanical
properties. However, common features can be identified:
Plastic shear failure (cohesive-frictional behavior)
Increase of the bulk stiffness with depth, i.e. with compaction state
Stiff behaviour during unloading/reloading compared to primary
compaction or shear loading
Degradation of the shear stiffness during primary shear loading
Evolution from contractant to dilatant during primary shear loading
Limitations of standard Mohr Coulomb model:
Accounts only for plastic shear failure
All other features are ignored
MMC is applicable for sands, silts and clays
MMC can be defined with Engineering input-parameters
Latest Enhancements
23 / 80
Permeable Elements to Consider Flow
Simulate the flow between two nodes and head boundary conditions
using elastic and rigid links
Latest Enhancements
24 / 80
Pile Element Interface
No Nodal Connectivity required between pile and soil
Pile and Tip created as separate mesh sets
Soil (solid)
Interface (line-to-solid) Pile (beam)
Latest Enhancements
25 / 80
Gauging Plate
Virtual 2D elements are extracted from 3D solids known as
Gauging Elements
Latest Enhancements
26 / 80
Gauging Plate
Tapered Beam Cross Sectional Properties
Latest Enhancements
27 / 80
Line Beam Load
Line Beam Load
Latest Enhancements
28 / 80
Beam End Release
Beam End Release
Latest Enhancements
29 / 80
2D Equivalent Linear (Dynamic)
2D Equivalent Linear (Dynamic))
Latest Enhancements
30 / 80
Convergence Report
Convergence Report
Analysis Types
Post-processing
Analysis
Analysis Types
32 / 80
Analysis Types
33 / 80
Element Library
Line Type
Truss / Embedded Truss
Beam/Non-linear Beam
Tension Only (Hook), Compression Only (Gap)
Plot Only (Dummy for modelling)
Plane Type
Plate (Shotcrete, Lining)
Gauging Plates
Geogrids
Plane Stress
Plane Strain
Axisymmetry
Plot Only
Solid Type
Solid
Others
Point Spring, Matrix Spring, Interface
Elastic Link, Rigid Link
3D Pile Elements
GTS provides linear and parabolic types for plate, plane stress and solid elements.
In GTS, all elements can be created in 3 ways:
(1) auto/map-mesh generation, mesh protrusion and mesh connection
(2) manual creation in GUI and/or table
(3) import mesh data from other programs
Analysis Types
34 / 80
Load & Boundary Conditions
Load
Self Weight / Force / Moment
Prescribed Displacement
Pressure / Prestress
Line / Element Beam Load
Nodal / Element Temperature, Temperature Gradient
Nodal Mass
Response Spectrum Analysis Data (including Various Design Spectrum Data)
Time History Analysis Data
- Time Forcing Function (including 54 Earthquake Acceleration Records)
- Ground Acceleration
- Time Varying Static Load
- Dynamic Nodal Load, Dynamic Surface Load
- Time History Result Function
Pressure on Surface Pressure on Element-Face
Transfer to FE
Apply Load and Boundary Conditions at the geometry level or mesh
Analysis Types
35 / 80
Example of Dynamic Analysis
Dynamic effects of high-speed train
Analysis Types
36 / 80
Load & Boundary Conditions
Boundary Conditions
Support
Nodal Head
Nodal Flux, Surface Flux
Seepage Boundary Function
Unsaturated Property Function
- Permeability Function
Gardner Coefficients
Frontal Function
User Defined Function
- Water Content Function
: van Genuchten, User Defined
Change Material
Change B.C. Set
Unsaturated Property Function
All boundary conditions can be applied both to FE and geometry.
Plate End Release
(Junction of Shotcrete)
Analysis Types
Post-processing
Analysis
38 / 80
Material Models
Material Model Behavior
Linear EIastic Simple
von Mises Elasto-Plastic
Tresca Elasto-Plastic
Mohr-CouIomb / Modified Mohr-CouIomb Elasto-Plastic, Softening, Hardening
Drucker-Prager Elasto-Plastic
TransverseIy lsotropic Anisotropic Elastic
Duncan-Chang Hyperbolic, Nonlinear Elastic
Hoek-rown Elasto-Plastic
!ointed Rock Anisotropic Elasto-Anisotropic Plastic
Modified Cam-CIay Elasto-Plastic
5train 5oftening Strain Softening
2D/3D lnterface Elasto-Plastic, Frictional & Cohesive
London CIay Jardine Model
D-Min ModeI Elastic
User-defined MateriaI User-coded Subroutine (Fortran)
GTS provides 16 material models as below :
S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
39 / 80
Modified Mohr-Coulomb Model
Non-linear elasticity following
a power law (Ohde-Janbu)
Stiff unloading/reloading
(unloading test, E
ur
, power m)
Cap hardening plasticity
following an exponential law
(similar to Modified Cam Clay)
Bulk stiffness increase with depth
or with primary comp. loading
(oedometer test, E
oed
)
Drucker-Prager flow rule
following Rowes law
Contractant to dilatant shearing
(dilation angles,
u
,
cv
)
Hardening MC plasticity
following Duncan-Chang law
Degradation of shear stiffness
(triaxial test, E
50
)
Mohr-Coulomb plasticity Plastic shear failure (c,
Model component Soil behaviour

Non-linear elasticity following
a power law (Ohde-Janbu)
Stiff unloading/reloading
(unloading test, E
ur
, power m)
Cap hardening plasticity
following an exponential law
(similar to Modified Cam Clay)
Bulk stiffness increase with depth
or with primary comp. loading
(oedometer test, E
oed
)
Drucker-Prager flow rule
following Rowes law
Contractant to dilatant shearing
(dilation angles
cv
)
Hardening MC plasticity
following Duncan-Chang law
Degradation of shear stiffness
(triaxial test, E
50
)
Mohr-Coulomb plasticity Plastic shear failure (c
)
Model component Soil behaviour
Pressure dependent Shear strength (with soil dilatancy),
irrecoverable compaction, and nonlinear elastic unloading.
Double hardening model: one yield surface for shear failure
one yield surface for compaction
40 / 80
Independent hardening surfaces
Shear hardening bounded by
failure line (ultimate friction angle)
Elliptic cap, shape factor
= 2/9*(1+2KNC)/(1-KNC)
Pressure shift for cohesion,
Smooth surface in hydrostatic
plane (no corners)
sensitive to intermediate
principal stress
Best fit to MC plastic surface
41 / 80
Failure line
Axial strain, e
Shear stress, Ds Volumetric strain, e
v
Axial strain, e
1-sin
u
2 sin
u
1
1-2 n
ur
Friction angle variation to match
Duncan & Changs law at ref. pressure
Duncan & Changs hyperbolic law:
Plastic flow rule following
Rowes law:
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
a
q
q
E
q
1 2
50
c

|
|
.
|
\
|
=
cv
cv
| |
| |
sin sin 1
sin sin
, 0 max sin

u u
u u
cv
|
|
|
sin sin 1
sin sin
sin
= with
42 / 80
Pressure Log(p)
Cap Hardening
Variation of the preconsolidation
pressure, p
c
, according to an
exponential law:
|
|
.
|
\
| +
=
vp c c
e
p p c
1
exp
0
ini
with ( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ ~ =
ref
ur
ref
ref
oed
ref
E
p
E
p
e
0
1 k
( )
c
ref ref
oed
C
e p E
3 . 2
1
0
+ =
For clays, note that:
( ) ( )
( )
s
ref
ur
ref
ur
C
e p E
10 ln
1 2 1 3
0
+ = v
43 / 80
Tri-axial test for Sand using MMC model compared with experimental resu
lts and competitive software
First hydrostatic loading, then
axial load-increments only
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-0.020 -0.018 -0.016 -0.014 -0.012 -0.010 -0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0.000
axial strain [-]
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r

s
t
r
e
s
s

[
k
P
a
]
Competition 100 Experiment 100 Competition 50 DIAGTS 100 DIAGTS 50
-0.001
0.001
0.003
0.005
0.007
0.009
-0.020 -0.018 -0.016 -0.014 -0.012 -0.010 -0.008 -0.006 -0.004 -0.002 0.000
axial strain [-]
v
o
l
u
m
e

s
t
r
a
i
n

[
-
]
Competition100 Experiment Competition 50 DIAGTS100 DIAGTS50
44 / 80
Tri-axial test for Undrained Clay using MMC model compared with ex
perimental results and competitive software
First hydrostatic loading, then
axial load-increments only
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-0.100 -0.080 -0.060 -0.040 -0.020 0.000
axial strain [-]
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r

s
t
r
e
s
s

[
k
P
a
]
Experiment
DIAGTS 50 undrained
DIAGTS 100 undrained
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-160 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0
isotropic stress (p') [kPa]
d
e
v
i
a
t
o
r

s
t
r
e
s
s

(
q
)

[
k
P
a
]
Experiment
DIAGTS 50 undrained
Analysis Types
Post-processing
Analysis
46 / 80
Overview
GTS uses multi-frontal sparse Gaussian solver as a system equation solver.
Multi-frontal sparse Gaussian solver is one of the fastest solvers in the iterative solving of
large solid models in non-linear analysis.
GTS also provides two iterative solvers, PCG (Pre-conditioned Conjugate Gradient),
GMRES (General Minimal Residual).
Pardiso, parallel direct sparse solver in Intel MKL, is a tuned math solver designed for high
performance on homogeneous multicore machines for 32/64-bit systems.
"Parallel on SMPs. Automatic combination of iterative and direct solver algorithms to
accelerate the solution process for very large three-dimensional systems."
- PARADISO Solver Project
Thread Safe, High-Performance, Robust, Memory Efficiency
47 / 80
Simple Benchmark
Model A
Model B
Model C
Model D
Solution Time of Multi-frontal Solver
Model A Model B Model C Model D
Element Type Plate Plate Solid Solid
No. of Elements 30,000 30,000 29,400 31,740
No. of DOFs 180,180 186,000 90,738 106,200
Solution Time [sec] 16 17 137 297
Analysis Types
Post-processing
Analysis
Post-processing
49 / 80
Overview
Complete Support for Visualization and Interpretation
Flexible User-control on Legends, Colors, Fonts, Magnification, etc.
Multiple Plots, Graphs and Tables in Multiple Windows
Deformed Shape Combined with Undeformed Shape (including Mode Shape)
Local Plots defined by Geometrical Topology or User-selection
Contour Plots and Animations (AVI)
Iso-value Lines (2D) and Surfaces (3D)
Clipping Planes and Slice Lines/Planes
Partitioned Plots
History Plots in Various Graphs and Animations (AVI)
Result Values in MS-Excel compatible Tables
Result Probe and Extraction
Result Extraction for Construction Stage Analysis and Time History Analysis
Screen-shots in WMF, BMP, PNG Picture Formats
State-of-the-art Reports Generated by XML and HTML
Post-processing
50 / 80
Works Tree
Result Table
Result Graph
MS-Excel
Contour Plot
Overview
Post-processing
51 / 80
Overview
Soil Stress Analysis
Displacement
Force (Truss, Embedded Truss), Moment (2D Shorcrete)
Reaction
Stress (Soil, Shotcrete, Rock Bolt)
- Total: Sxx, Syy, Szz, Sxy, Syz, Sxz
- Effective: Sxx, Syy, Szz, Sxy, Syz, Sxz
- Principal Stresses (P1, P2, P3)
- Pore Pressure
- Mean Effective, Mean Total
- Safety Factor
- Yield Ratio
Strain
- Exx, Eyy, Ezz, Exy, Eyz, Exz
- Principal Strains (E1, E2, E3)
- Max Shear Strain
- Deviatoric Strain
- Volumetric Strain
Seepage Analysis
Velocity
Pressure, Total Head
Head Gradient
Flow
All results are outputted according to activated element types:
Post-processing
52 / 80
Contour Plot Types
Contour with Mesh Contour with Iso-line Contour with Mesh & Iso-line
Contour without Mesh Gradient Contour Gray Contour
Post-processing
53 / 80
Gradient Contour Animation (Example)
Post-processing
54 / 80
Contour with Deformation
Displacement Contour (Gradient Plot)
with Deformed Shape
Front View
Side View
Undeformed Model
Post-processing
55 / 80
Contour with Deformation (Animation)
Consolidation Analysis
Post-processing
56 / 80
Iso-surface Plots
Multiple Iso-surfaces with Feature-Edge Multiple Iso-surfaces with Mesh
Post-processing
57 / 80
Clipping Plots
Original Plot
Multiple Clipping Planes
Post-processing
58 / 80
On-Curve Diagrams
2D On-Curve Graphs on Contour Plot
Fault Zone
3D On-Curve Graphs on Contour Plot
Front View
Post-processing
59 / 80
Seepage (Flow Path/Quantity)
Click Survey Position in Work Window
Calculates Flow Quantity
at Arbitrary Plane
Defined by Selected Nodes
Flow Path Flow Quantity
Post-processing
60 / 80
Result Extraction
Start Stage / Time
End Stage / Time
Stage / Output Set
Result Type
Node / Element IDs
MS-Excel compatible Table
(Time & Nodal Pressure Head)
Graph (Time vs. Pressure Head)
Results can be extracted based on:
Construction Stage
Time (Time History / Transient Seepage
Analysis)
Coordinates (User-defined Coordinate Sys.)
Transient Seepage Result (Pressure Head)
Post-processing
61 / 80
Result Extraction
Location
Stage
Result
3D Step Graph
3D Step Graph
Post-processing
62 / 80
Settlement Profiles
Mesh & Displacement Contour
Settlement Profile (3D Plane, 2D Line)
Define Settlement Grids
Settlement (MS-Excel Compatible Table)
Post-processing
63 / 80
Probe & Result Tag
Flying View Flying View
Flying View
Geometry Modelling
Mesh Generation
Modelling Wizard
Modelling
Geometry Modelling
65 / 80
Overview
Advanced modelling functions can be used in surface & solid modelling.
Curve Surface Solid
Advanced
modelling
Tunnel Section
Line, Polyline
Arc, Circle
Polygon
B-Spline
Fillet, Chamfer
Trim, Extend
Intersect
Offset, Tangent
Break, Merge
Plane Patch
Coons Patch
NURBS Patch
Grid Patch
Vertex Patch
Fillet, Chamfer
Sew, Fuse
Trim, Divide
Extend
Imprint
Box, Wedge
Cylinder, Cone
Sphere, Torus
Trim, Divide
Embed
Boolean Op.
(Fuse, Cut, )
Stitch Surfaces
Extrude
Revolve
Loft
Sweep
Fillet, Chamfer
Offset, Draft
Shelling
Local Prism
Check, Repair
Transformation

Geometry Modelling
66 / 80
Data Exchange
Import (Geometry)
Export (Geometry)
Standards for Data Exchange
STEP (STandard for the Exchange of Product Model Data)
IGES (Initial Graphics Exchange Specification)
STL (STereo Lithography) De facto standard for RP
Neutral Format File ASCII (American Standard Code for
Information Interchange)
IGES Geometry
Generated Mesh
Geometry Modelling
67 / 80
TGM (Terrain Geometry Maker)
Specialized Module for Real Terrain Geometry
DXF Data TGM
GTS
Digital Map
Geometry Modelling
Mesh Generation
Modelling Wizard
Modelling
Mesh Generation
69 / 80
Overview
Auto Map Protrude
Manipulation
Solid
Surface
k-Curve Area
k-Face Volume
4-Node Area
Create
Extract
Connection
Change Para.
Smooth
Divide
Check
Quality
Merge
Transform
Extrude
Revolve
Project
Fill
Sweep
Geometry
Element
Node
Object
Solid
Surface
Edge
Planar Area
4-Curve Area
2D 3D
Quadrilateral
Combined
Triangle
Type
Mesh Generation
70 / 80
Mesher Types
Loop Mesher
Direct 5urface Mesher based on Looping AIgorithm
DeIaunay Mesher
lndirect 5urface Mesher based on DeIaunay TrianguIation
Grid Mesher
Hybrid 5urface Mesher based on Modified Grid-based Approach
Tetra Mesher
5oIid Mesher based on DeIaunay TetrahedraIization & Advancing Front
Map Mesher
5tructured 5urface/5oIid Mesher based on Transfinite lnterpoIation
Mesh Generation
71 / 80
Quality Assurance & Checking Controls
Check & Verify
Free Edges/Faces
Check & Align ECS
Quality Assurance
Aspect Ratio
Skew Angle
Taper (2D)
Warpage (2D)
Jacobian Ratio
Twist
Collapse (Tetra)
Twisted Penta
Collapsed Tetra
(Near Zero Volume)
Mesh Quality Plot
Check Free Face
(Unconnected Element Face)
Free Face
Geometry Modelling
Mesh Generation
Modelling Wizard
Modelling
Modelling Wizard
73 / 80
Construction Stage Wizard
Simulate Selected Stages
Excavation Initial & Embanking
Drag & Drop
Transient Seepage
Analysis Control
Load Distribution Factors
Tree Structure
Modelling Wizard
74 / 80
Construction Stage Wizard
GTS provides semi-automatic method for the definition of construction stages using name
pattern (base name + suffix number).
Tree Structure
Mesh
Load
B.C.
Construction
Chart
Construction Stage Definition
based on Naming Rule
Tunnel 002
Construction Stage Simulator
Modelling Wizard
75 / 80
Tunnel Wizard
GTS provides Tunnel modelling Wizard for simple and regular-type 3D tunnel models.
Tunnel modelling Wizard automatically generates full analysis data, mesh, loads,
boundary conditions and construction stages, from the user-defined parameters.
Tunnel modelling Wizard also provides its own file I/O service to help users
accelerate modelling works for similar models and build their own tunnel templates.
Tunnel modelling Wizard Generated Analysis Model (Mesh, LBC, CS, etc.)
Modelling Wizard
76 / 80
Tunnel Wizard
Complete Model Generated by Tunnel Wizard
Front View
Iso View
Core + S/C + R/B
Analysis Data
Result Summary
Modelling Wizard
77 / 80
Anchor Wizard
Automatically generates mesh sets using input data, from on dialog
box, for material, section, angle, un-grouted length, & etc.
QA /QC
79 / 80
QA/QC Internal Qa/Qc & Regression testing systems
Comparison of elementary tests with experiments and
competitive software
Verification tests
250 specific tests-in DIANA test-suite
5000 regression tests for DIANA in tests-suite
Automatic testing of every update patch
Coverage analysis of source code
Functionality combination coverage of test-suite
BEST WESTERN HOTEL
BEST WESTERN HOTEL

Presented By: Sudioto Susilo Presented By: Sudioto Susiloooo PPPPPPPPPP dd B SS ddii SS iill PPPPPrrreeessseeennnttttteeeddddd BBBBByyy::: SSSSSuuudddddiiiiioootttttooo SSSSSuuusssiiiiilllllooo PPPPPPPPPPrrrrrreeeeeesssssseeeeeennnnnnttttttttteeeeeedddddddddd BBBBBBBBBByyyyyyy:::: SSSSSSSSSSuuuuuuddddddddddiiiiiiiiooooootttttttttoooooo SSSSSSSSSSuuuuuussssssiiiiiiiilllllllllloooooo Presented By: Sudioto Susilo Presented By: Sudioto Susilo
BEST WESTERN HOTEL
BEST WESTERN HOTEL
Project Project Data Data
Address: Teluk Gong Raya JakartaUtara Address: Teluk Gong Raya JakartaUtara
Number oI Storey : 15 storey Number oI Storey : 15 storey
Basement : 1 semi basement Basement : 1 semi basement
Proposed Ior 3 Star Hotel Proposed Ior 3 Star Hotel
Foundation Driven : 50 x 50 cm L : 16 m Foundation Driven : 50 x 50 cm L : 16 m
Excavation Excavation
North, West, East, South : Open Cut North, West, East, South : Open Cut
South East : Driven Pile 50 x 50 cm South East : Driven Pile 50 x 50 cm

Problem
Problem

There is very soIt to soIt silty clay soil layer Irom 5 There is very soIt to soIt silty clay soil layer Irom 5
to 10 m below the ground surIace to 10 m below the ground surIace
Lateral pile bearing capacity dominant than vertical Lateral pile bearing capacity dominant than vertical
bearing capacity Ior pile Ioundation design bearing capacity Ior pile Ioundation design
Loading combination due to vertical load gravitation Loading combination due to vertical load gravitation
and seismic horizontal load can not be calculated and seismic horizontal load can not be calculated
using conventional calculation using conventional calculation
Problem
Problem

II we used conventional calculation we

II we used conventional calculation we
should use more driven pile Ior lateral
should use more driven pile Ior lateral
load
load
Using better soil replacement to

Using better soil replacement to
increase lateral capacity need, a certain
increase lateral capacity need, a certain
distance Irom the outer basement edge
distance Irom the outer basement edge
Project Location
Project Location
Soil Data
Soil Data
Soil Data
Soil Data
Soil Data
Soil Data
Soil Data
Soil Data
Basement
Basement
Structural
Structural
Cross
Cross
section
section
Proposed Driven Pile Elevation
Proposed Driven Pile Elevation
Settlement Contour
Settlement Contour
Lateral Capacity
Lateral Capacity
Using LPILE 6
Using LPILE 6
Pile Size Pile
Depth
Pile Head
Condition
Pall Pult Mm
ax
Mult
cm m kN kN kN.
m
kN.
m
50x50 13 Fixed Head
(cyclic) Sirtu
50 155 -130 -350
50x50 13 Fixed Head
(cyclic) w/o sirtu
83 105 -160 -380
Lateral Capacity Ior Allowable displ 1/4"
with and without Soil Improvement 1.5 m depth
Lateral Capacity
Lateral Capacity
Using LPILE 6
Using LPILE 6
Piles Group Analyses
Using Group v.8
Using Group v.8
Rule oI Thumb Ior Distance
Rule oI Thumb Ior Distance
Replacement oI Better Soil
Replacement oI Better Soil
MIDAS GTS 2011
MIDAS GTS 2011
MIDAS GTS 2011
MIDAS GTS 2011
MIDAS GTS 2011
MIDAS GTS 2011
Discussion
Discussion
It is Generally known that lateral pile capacity

It is Generally known that lateral pile capacity
depend on the upper part both oI soil and pile.
depend on the upper part both oI soil and pile.
Total Group lateral capacity can be increased by

Total Group lateral capacity can be increased by
adding some piles but the lateral eIIiciency will
adding some piles but the lateral eIIiciency will
be reduced because the distance between pile
be reduced because the distance between pile
will shorter.
will shorter.
From economic consideration, soil

From economic consideration, soil
improvement Ior increasing pile lateral capacity,
improvement Ior increasing pile lateral capacity,
in this case will increase pile capacity up to 66,
in this case will increase pile capacity up to 66,
with the same cost by using pile addition, its only
with the same cost by using pile addition, its only
increase about 30,2
increase about 30,2
Conclusion
Conclusion
There is limitation Ior conventional

There is limitation Ior conventional
calculation
calculation
Using 3 D soItware programme can be

Using 3 D soItware programme can be
used Ior problem solving oI lateral
used Ior problem solving oI lateral
displacement due to combination oI
displacement due to combination oI
gravitation and seismic load
gravitation and seismic load

Copyright Since 1989 MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.
e-mail I info@midasit.com www.MidasUser.com
PELAKSANAAN SEMINAR MIDAS

Seminar Midas 12 Juli 2011

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Seminar Midas 12 Juli 2011

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Selasa, 12 Juli 2011

Advanced Finite Element Solutions for Civil Engineers

Drag & Drop

2.2. Modelisasi Midas Civil

2.3. Analisis Dinamika Struktur

Analisis dinamik dilakukan khususnya untuk menganalisis respons struktur terhadap

2.5. Contoh Hasil Analisis Balok Pelengkung

3.2. Modelisasi Midas Civil

Analisis struktur dilakukan dengan menggunakan program Midas Civil 2010.

3.5. Contoh Hasil Analisis Pilar Jembatan Utama

4. JEMBATAN BETON TIPE CABLE STAYED

Model component Soil behaviour

Geotechnical & Tunnel analysis System

Project Project Data Data

Number oI Storey : 15 storey Number oI Storey : 15 storey

Basement : 1 semi basement Basement : 1 semi basement

Proposed Ior 3 Star Hotel Proposed Ior 3 Star Hotel

Foundation Driven : 50 x 50 cm L : 16 m Foundation Driven : 50 x 50 cm L : 16 m

South East : Driven Pile 50 x 50 cm South East : Driven Pile 50 x 50 cm

II we used conventional calculation we

Using better soil replacement to

It is Generally known that lateral pile capacity

Total Group lateral capacity can be increased by

From economic consideration, soil

There is limitation Ior conventional

Using 3 D soItware programme can be

Você também pode gostar