9/1/2013

7.10.2

7.10.2: SOLID SLAB BRIDGE DESIGN

SOLID SLAB BRIDGE DESIGN

PROBLEM STATEMENT: Design the simply supported solid slab bridge of Fig.7.2-1 with a span length of 10670mm center to center of bearing for a HL-93 live load. The roadway width is 13400mm curb to curb. Allow for a future wearing surface of 75mm thick bituminous overlay. Use fc=30MPa and fy=400 MPa. Follow the slab bridge outline in Appendix A5.4 and the beam and girder bridge outline in section 5Appendix A5.3 of the AASHTO (1994) LRFD bridge specifications.
2

7.10.2: SOLID SLAB BRIDGE DESIGN

A. CHECK MINIMUM RECOMMENDED DEPTH [TABLE A2.5.2.6.3-1]

9/1/2013

B. DETERMINE LIVE LOAD STRIP WIDTH [A4.6.2.3]

B. DETERMINE LIVE LOAD STRIP WIDTH [A4.6.2.3]

1. One-Lane loaded:

Multiple presence factor included [C4.6.2.3}

1 1

C. APPLICABILITY OF LIVE LOADS FOR DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS

1. MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE AXLE LOADS [FIG.E7.2-2]

C. APPLICABILITY OF LIVE LOADS FOR DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS

9/1/2013

C. APPLICABILITY OF LIVE LOADS FOR DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS 2. Maximum Bending Moment at Midspan-Axle Loads Truck: McTr=[145(2668+518)+35(518)] x 10-3 = 480.1 KN m Lane: McLn=9.3[1/2(2668)(10670)] x 10-3 = 132.4 KN m Tandem: McTa=110(2668) x 10-3 (1+4135/5335)= 521.0 KN m

C. APPLICABILITY OF LIVE LOADS FOR DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS 1. MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT AT MIDSPANAXLE LOADS [FIG.E7.2-3]

MLL+IM = 521.0 (1.33) + 132.4 = 825.3 KN m

10

D. SELECTION OF RESISTANCE FACTORS (Table 7.10 [A5.5.4.2.1]

E. Select load modifiers [A1.3.2.1]

11

12

9/1/2013

F. SELECT APPLICABLE LOAD COMBINATION (TABLE 3.1 [TABLE A3.4.1-1]) 1. STRENGTH I LIMIT STATE

G. CALCULATE LIVE LOAD FORCE EFFECTS

1. INTERIOR STRIP.

2. SERVICE I LIMIT STATE

3. FATIGUE LIMIT STATE

13

14

G. CALCULATE LIVE LOAD FORCE EFFECTS

2. EDGE STRIP [A4.6.2.1.4]

G. CALCULATE LIVE LOAD FORCE EFFECTS

15

16

9/1/2013

H. CALCULATE FORCE EFFECTS FROM OTHER loads

1. INTERIOR STRIP, 1-mm WIDE

H. CALCULATE FORCE EFFECTS FROM OTHER loads

2. EDGE STRIP, 1 m WIDE

17

18

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

1. DURIBILITY

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

a. MOMENT- INTERIOR STRIP

19

20

9/1/2013

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

b. MOMENT-EDGE STRIP

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

2. CONTROL OF CRACKING
s sa

a.

INTERIOR STRIP

r c r

21

22

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

STEEL STRESS
s

Location of neutral axis

y sa

cr

23

24

9/1/2013

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

b. EDGE STRIP

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

STEEL STRESS
s

(103)(x2) = (35 x 103)(510-x)

cr

25

26

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

3. DEFORMATIONS [A5.7.3.6]

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

g cr t

c e cr e a cr a cr

27

28

9/1/2013

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

By using Ig: [A5.7.3.6.2]

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

b. LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION: (OPTIONAL)[A2.5.2.6.2]

29

30

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

Back
4607mm
31 32

9/1/2013

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

DESIGN LANE LOAD

Lane

33

34

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

The live load deflection estimate of 17mm is conservative because Ie was based on the maximum moment at midspan rather than an average Ie over the entire span. Also, the additional stiffness provided by the concrete barriers has been neglected, as well as the compression reinforcement in the top of the slab. Bridges typically deflect less than the calculations predict and as a result the deflection check has been made optional.
35

5. Concrete stresses [A5.9.4.3]. As there is no prestressing therefore concrete stresses does not apply.

36

9/1/2013

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

5. FATIGUE [A5.5.3]

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

Fatigue load should be one truck with 9000-mm axle spacing [A3.6.1.1.2]. As the rear axle spacing is large, therefore the maximum moment results when the two front axles are on the bridge. as shown in Fig.E7.2-8, the two axle loads are placed on the bridge. No multiple presence factor is applied (m=1). From Fig.E7.2-8
37 38

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

I. INVESTIGATE SERVICE LIMIT STATE

b. REINFORCING BARS:[A5.5.3.2]

min

a. TENSILE LIVE LOAD STRESSES: One loaded lane, E=4370mm

39

40

10

9/1/2013

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE 1. FLEXURE [A5.7.3.2] RECTANGULAR STRESS DISTRIBUTION [A5.7.2.2]
(2/7)

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

a. INTERIOR STRIP:

41

42

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE For simple span bridges, temperature gradient effect reduces gravity load effects. Because temperature gradient may not always be there, so assume =0

43

44

11

9/1/2013

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

b. EDGE STRIP

So the strength limit state governs.

Use No.30 @ 150 mm for interior strip.

45

46

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

J. INVESTIGATE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

STRENGTH I:

2. SHEAR Slab bridges designed for moment in conformance with AASHTO[A4.6.2.3] maybe considered satisfactory for shear.

Use No. 30 @ 140mm for edge strip.

47

48

12

9/1/2013

K. DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT [A5.14.4.1]

K. DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT [A5.14.4.1]

a. INTERIOR SPAN:

The amount of bottom transverse reinforcement maybe taken as a percentage of the main reinforcement required for positive moment as.

49

50

K. DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT [A5.14.4.1] b. EDGE STRIP:

L. SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE REINFORCEMENT

Transverse reinforcement in the top of the slab [A5.10.8]

51

52

13

9/1/2013

M. DESIGN SKETCH

53

14