Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
In The Damned Human Race, Mark Twain compares the behavior of different animals to human beings to prove in contrary to the Darwinian Theory. Humans actually descended from higher beings. His essay proves a lot of good points. Humans are selfish and wasteful, while animals take only what they need to survive, humans are the only beings in nature that hold grudges and take revenge and that humans are the only beings with morals. I agree and disagree with Mark Twains essay. He did live in a different time but cruelty still exists the same. If you analyze the human race or all animals, you can find evil in both creatures. Humans and animals cannot be compared properly. Animals do some awful things to each other as well as human. Mark Twain just lists humans bad traits. There are a lot of positive traits of humans; he goes into detail of only the negative traits of humans. If there are bad people, there can also be good people. Its true today, and was also true in the time Mark Twain lived in. In the 1860s, around the time when Mark Twain lived, there was an American Civil War and this is probably why he was so ashamed of human beings. There is something he missed about humans. We have to look outside of all the bad and evil and recognize people who are becoming vegetarians to save an animal, going green to save the planet or people who become doctors to treat sick people. If we didnt have moral sense, how would we be capable of doing these things? Mark Twain is pointing out too many of the flaws that the human race has, and not enough of the qualities that we possess. There is no rarer man than Mark Twain. Through his view on American society both during, before, and at times ahead of his own time, his works and stories live on even hundreds of years after his death. One excellent example of his work is the essay, "The Damned Human Race", where he takes the form of a scientific journal and explains his theory as to why humans did not ascend from wild animals, but rather descend. Twain uses satire, most notably sarcasm, in his essay to show that society is more backwards than the average individual thinks. Twain opens the journal by establishing his credibility. He notes that he used the scientific method in his studies, a source used by even the greatest, smartest scientists. Twain begins listing the differences between the animals, and the result is, to say the least, embarrassing. A stand-out comparison is between the earl and the anaconda: the anaconda will eat what it needs and will only kill what it will eat, but the earl is cruel and will kill as many as it can for its own pleasure. He also notes that anything inherited from animals has been corrupted along the way. This is all done very sarcastically and borderline-mockingly; and the end result is a master work in the art of satire. He shows signs of a joking tone at times but it is clear that he is not ridiculing the entire subject just for the sake of a cheap laugh or for stupid ridicule; it is obvious that he wants things to change. And this is what makes the essay truly great- at its core, it is ridicule for the sake of change, and it sets the bar for all other satires that follow.