!"!#$ &#'()*!

+#$
"urag" (someumes
called ,-. ./0-01,23/
or 45-6 ./0-01,23/)
refers Lo forces LhaL
oppose Lhe mouon of
a solld ob[ecL Lhrough
a uld
1l1LL: !"!#$ &#'()*!+#$

"-78 +9 :26 951 ;<-3< .919. =/2>1< ;9.?0 @/01A

!.9@=/78 &9; 69/0 1</ =/2>1< 9B 1</ .919. ,C/31 1</
,79521 9B D7/ 1</ E,E/. </=-39E1/. 0E-20F

&GE91</0-08
(BH 1</2H @/3,50/H
Length of
Rotor (cm)
Time of spin (sec)
1

2

3 4 5
Average
7.5
(Long)
6.0
5.0
3.0
2.0
(Short)
rocedure:
- urop helghL: 2 meLers
- number of 1rlals: 3
- CeL Lhe average of Lhe 3 Lrlals.
Summary of observauons:
Concluslon: WrlLe a paragraph explalnlng
how and why drag aecLed roLor lengLh
and lLs ablllLy Lo spln.
Paper Helicopter: Level of Proficiency
Exemplary (100%) Proficient (88%) Developing (76%) Emerging (64%)
Insufficient
Evidence
Page is properly headed
and dated; follows note
taking format.
Data is complete (all
trials) and data table is
neatly presented.
Summary observation
includes actual numbers.
Conclusion answers
hypothesis; concept of
drag is properly
explained and relates to
the experiment.
Page is properly
headed and dated;
follows note taking
format.
Data is complete (all
trials) and data table is
neatly presented.
Summary observation
includes actual
numbers.
Conclusion answers
hypothesis; concept of
drag is adequately
explained.

Page is properly
headed and dated;
follows note taking
format.
Data is complete (all
trials) and data table
is neatly presented.
Summary
observation does not
include actual
numbers.
Conclusion answers
Hypothesis but
concept of drag is not
properly explained.

Page is properly
headed and dated;
does not follow note
taking format.
Data is complete (all
trials) but data table is
not neatly presented.
Summary observation
is inadequate.
Conclusion is not
thorough.