P.o.p. Of the philippines vs. Jose Rayray y Areola. Accused-appellant argues that his arrest was illegal because he had no authority to arrest persons in San Fernando, La Union. We cannot yield to appellant's view that his essential duty of apprehending criminal offenders is set aside on the shallow excuse that he is not in his place of assignment.
P.o.p. Of the philippines vs. Jose Rayray y Areola. Accused-appellant argues that his arrest was illegal because he had no authority to arrest persons in San Fernando, La Union. We cannot yi…