( FL LT P) 2011 2

74

: Danica Seleskov itch : /

,
, : , ,
;
, , ,

: ; ;

1.

( )

( ment al
represent at ion)
;

( )

, ,

, ( a t riangular

,
,

process) ( : 37) , ,
,

, ;

, ,

, ,

( : 85) Seleskov it ch
/

( deverbalizat ion,

2.

) ,
( Seleskovitch& L ederer, 1984)

, ( )

Jean Herbert Herbert ( 1952)

/ vouloir dire) ( )

,
,

; ,
;

Julius

( transcoding ) (

Wirl ,
,

) ,
( interpret ing)

( P chhacker, 1992:

212)

( interpret ive t ranslation) ,

H erbert , Seleskovit ch ( 1962)

,

,
( 1)

, Seleskovitch

Seleskov it ch( 1978: 8)

( )

:
1)

( FL LT P) 2011 2

75

1 Seleskov itch ( Seleskovitch& L ederer , 1984)

;
2) ,

3) ,

( language pair )

;
4) ,

,
,

, ,

3.

1)

( formalized) ,

( 1)

, ,

, (

, 2004; M unday, 2001) Seleskovit ch

,

,
( ) ,

, (

( )

, 2003) Seleskovit ch ,

( ) ( )
, ,

: ,

, ;

( 2)

, ( Wilss, 1978:

20 60
70 ,

351) ,
, ,

( Herbert , 1952; Rozan, 1956; P aneth, 1957,

2002) ,

, ,

76

( FL LT P) 2011 2

( t angible) ,

,
,

,
, ,

Seleskovit ch :
,

; ,

3 , :

; ,

professional and inst it ut ional models)

( int eract ion models )

( informat ion processing models) ,

( Seleskovitch, 1978: 8) Seleskovit ch

( interpret ing process models )

( mult iple t ask models) ( complex

operat ions models) ( P chhacker, 2004:

Seleskovit ch

84 109)

,
,

,
,

Moser( 1978: 353 368) L ederer

( 1981: 50)
Stenzl( 1983: 45)

Cokely ( 1992: 124)

Kalina( P chhacker,

,
,

2004: 96) Set ton ( 1999:

65) Chernov ( 2004)

Seleskovitch ,

,
20 60 70

( Cokely
) ,

( )

,
( ,

2007a: 11) ,

, ,

,
, ,

, 20 80

: / ,

( 3) /

Lederer ( 1981 ) Kalina ( P chhacker,

2004: 96 )
( comm unicative mediation)

( )

( socio

( FL LT P) 2011 2

77

Sett on( 1999)

,

, /

Set ton

, ( lang uage of t hought )

Set ton

, 20 80 ,
,

( 365) ;
( ent it ies)

( 192) , Sett on

4.

, :

3 6 ,

: Set ton

, ,

( Carroll, 1994) ,

, 7 ( 7 )

2)

20 ( Le Ny & Kintsch, 1983: 4) ,

20 50 - 70

( 1)

( T aylor& T ay lor, 1983: 212)

Seleskovit ch

( empirical) ,
,

,
, Seleskovitch

,
: ,

/ mental

, ;

represent at ion) ,
,

, ,

, ,

, ,

( int ermediat e

( 2)

,
Seleskovit ch

,
,

, ,
, ,

,
,

78

( FL LT P) 2011 2

, ,

( , 2007b: 192)
,

,
,

: ,

, ,

, ,

; ,

,
;

) , ,

, ,

,
,

, ,

( : 193)
,

: ;

; ,

,
;

,
,

, ;

( : 192

193)
:

,
( , 2004; ,

2005; , 2006) ,

( )

(
, ) ,

,
,

( )
, ,

( expect at ion structure) ( L orscher, 1991)

, ,

( FL LT P) 2011 2

79

, ( , 2002: 253)

Simultaneous I nter p retating: A Probability Pr ediction

M odel .

Publishing Co mpany.

,
,

, ,
,

conference interpreters .
Shlesinger ( eds. ) .

In F.

P chhacker & M .

T he I nter p reting Studies Reader .

London& N ew York: Routledg e.

Ger ver, D. 1971. A sp ects of Simultaneous I nter p retation

Ger ver,

T he effects of source language

presentation rate on the performance of simultaneous

Benjamins

Bertonsville, M D: L instok P ress.

Ger ver, D. 1969/ 2002.

and

John

Cokely, D. 1992. I nter p retation: A Sociolinguistic M odel.

,
, ( )
,

Amsterdam/ Philadelphia:

H uman

I nf or mation

Processing .

Ph.

D.

Dissertation. Ox ford: Ox for d U niversity .

D.

1976.

Empirical studies of simultaneous

interpretation: A review and a model . In R. W. Brislin

( ed. ) . T r anslation : A p p lications and Research. N ew
York: G ar dner P ress.
Herbert, J. 1952. L e M anuel de L

inter p r te. Geneva:

Geo rg.

, ,

Isham, W . P. 1994.

deverbalization .

M emor y for sentence form after

simultaneous Interpretation: Ev idence bo th for and against

In S.

Lambert& B.

M oser M ercer

( ed. ) .

Br idging the Gap :

Emp irical Resear ch in

5.

Simultaneous I nterp r etation.

Amsterdam/ Philadelphia:

, Seleskovit ch
,
,
, ,

,
, ,
, 21 ,

John Benjamins Publishing Company .

Lawson,

E.

A.

1967.

A ttention and simultaneous

translat ion . L anguage and Sp eech 10.

Lederer, M . 1981. L a T r aduction Si multan e Exp r ience
et T h or ie. Paris: M inard L ett res Mo dernes.
Le Ny , Jean Fr anco is & W. Kintsch. 1983. L anguage and
Compr ehension. Amsterdam: Nor th Holland Publishing
Company.
Lorscher,

W.

1991.

T r anslation

Perf or mance,

Psycholinguistic I nvestigation. T bingen: Gunter Narr

Verlag .

( Gerver, 1976; M assaro, 1978; M oser, 1978

) , 20 80

T ranslation Process and T ranslation Str ategies :

Massar o, D. W. 1978.

An I nformation processing model

of understanding speech . In D. Gerver& H . W. Sinaiko

( eds. ) . Language I nterp r etation and Communication.
New Y ork& Lo ndon: Plenum Press.
Moser,

B.

1978.

Simult aneous

interpreting:

hy pothetical model and its practical application . In D.

Barik,

Com munication. N ew Yor k& London: Plenum Pr ess.

H.

C.

1975.

Simultaneous

interpretatio n:

Qualitative and ling uistic data . Language and Sp eech 2.

Carroll, D . 1994. T he Psy chology of L anguage. Pacific
Grove, California: Br ooks/ Cole Publishing Company.
Cher nov, G. V . 2004.

I nf erence and A nticip ation in

Gerver& H. W . Sinaiko. Language I nterp r etation and

Munday,

J.

2001.

I ntr oducing T r anslation S tudies :

T heor ies and A pp lications . L ondon Routledge.

Paneth, E. 1957/ 2000.
interpretation .

An investig atio n into conference

I n F.

P chhacker & M .

Shlesing er

( FL LT P) 2011 2

80
( eds. ) . T he I nter p reting Studies Reader . L ondon& New
York: Routledge.

T aylor, I . & M . M . T aylo r. 1983. T he Psy chology of

Reading . Academic Press.

P chhacker , F. 1992.

T he role of theo ry in simultaneous

interpretin . In C. Doller up& A.

Loddegaar d ( ed. ) .

T eaching T r anslation and I nterp r eting :

Wilss, W . 1978.

simultaneous interpretation . In D. Gerver & H. W.

Sinaiko

T r aining,

T alent and Exp er ience. A msterdam/ P hiladelphia: John

, 2003, , 5

Consecutiv e. Geneva: Geor g.

Interpr tation des Conferences.

, 2005, , :

Babel 8/ 1.
D.

Conf erences:

1978.

I nterp r eting f or I nter national

Pr oblems

Com munication.

T rans.

of
D.

L anguage

Stephanie &

and
E.

, 2007a,

, 2007b, , :

Seleskovitch, D. & M . L eder er . 1984. I nterp r ter p our

, 2004, ( ) , :

T r aduir e. P ar is: Didier Erudition.

1999.

Cognitive Pr agmatic

Simultaneous

I nterp r etation:

A nalysis .

Amsterdam/

Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company .

C.

1983.

, 1 .

N.

M cM illan. Washing ton: Pen and Booth.

Stenzl,

and

, 2004, , :

London& N ew York: Routledge.

R.

I nter p retation

R ozan, J. F. 1956. Le Prise de Notes en I nter p r tation

Setton,

L anguage

, 2002, , :

Benjamins Publishing Company.

Seleskovitch,

( eds. ) .

Com munication. N ew Yor k & London: Plenum Pr ess.

P chhacker , F . 2004. I ntroducing I nter p r eting Studies .

Seleskovitch, D. 1962. L

Syntactic anticipation in German English

Simultaneous

I nterp r etation:

Groundw ork T ow ar d a Comp r ehensive M odel . M . A.

T hesis. Birkbeck College, U niversity of L ondon.

, 2006, , :

, 2010,

, 2

( : 518060
)

A Study on Seleskovitch s Triangular Model of Interpreting

by ZHANG Jiliang
Abstract: Danica Seleskovitch, representative of the Paris School, claims that percept ion/
comprehension, deverbalizat ion and expression const it ut e a t riangular model of int erpreting rat her than a
linear process of messag e/ sense transfer. T his art icle, by tracking t he generation of this interpret ing model
and ref lect ing upon it s theoret ical values and deficiencies, argues that t his very t riang ular model, t hough
failing t o elaborate on the hypot hesis of deverbalizat ion and how linguistic informat ion is processed in
interpret ing, is a bold theoret ical innovation w hich helps accelerat e t he cognit ive psy chological t urn of
internat ional int erpreting st udies and serves as great inspirat ion for t he emergence of ensuing informat ion
processing models of interpret ing. T hen the art icle, based on t he t heories of modern cog nit ive psychology,
proposes that t he processing of linguist ic inf orm at ion in interpret ing is accomplished t hrough t he
combination of controlled and automat ic processing, serial and parallel processing and top dow n and bot tom
up processing.
Key words: interpret ing; cognit ive psychology; t he P aris School