Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • Fisica 2 - Cap 31

    Enviado por

    leogomes21
    28 visualizações9 páginas
    Magnetic field is normal to the plane of the loop and is uniform over the loop. The magnetic flux: through the loop is give.n by iI jji' =.AS = 'i'iT2 b, wber e.A = 'lH,2 'is the area of the loop,. Thus, the current flow in the loop is eleckwise.

    Descrição original:

    Direitos autorais

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formatos disponíveis

    PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    Magnetic field is normal to the plane of the loop and is uniform over the loop. The magnetic flux: through the loop is give.n by iI jji' =.AS = 'i'iT2 b, wber e.A = 'lH,2 'is the area of the loop,. Thus, the current flow in the loop is eleckwise.

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    28 visualizações9 páginas

    Fisica 2 - Cap 31

    Enviado por

    leogomes21
    Magnetic field is normal to the plane of the loop and is uniform over the loop. The magnetic flux: through the loop is give.n by iI jji' =.AS = 'i'iT2 b, wber e.A = 'lH,2 'is the area of the loop,. Thus, the current flow in the loop is eleckwise.

    Direitos autorais:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 9
    ‘The magnetic field is normal to the plans of the loop and is uniform over the loop. ‘Thus at auy instant the magnetic lux through the loop is given by ®y = AB = nrB, where A = ris the area of the bop. According to Faraday’ law the magnitude of the emf in the loop is, Be — (0.006 m)8(040 Ts) = 1.5 = 10-8 @ = Hier +709 =128+70= BEN + 70=31 mv (b) Appealing to Lenz's lave (especially Fig. 31-5(a)) we se that the current tlow in the loop is clockwise ‘Thus, the current is from right to left through R. (a) Table 27-1 gives the resistivity of copper. Thus, R= p& = (168 10° Om) =l1x10 (b) We use # = |E/R = [dys /dt|/ = (nr2/ R)|AB/att|, Thus dB) aR _ WOA\LA x 0-89) , ae|— ae rome TT The primary difference hetween this and the situation described in Saraple Problem 31-1 is inthe quantity A. The area throngh which there is nagnetie dnc is not the area of the short eoil, ia this ease, but is the ‘rea of the solenoid (there is no field outside an ideal solenoid). Actually, because of the current (which vwe calculate bere) in the short coil, there is « very stmall amount of field outside the solenoid (caused by that current) ~ but it may be disregarded in this ealeulation, The values ate as indicated in Sample Problem 81-1 except that 4 = D2/I (where D = 0.082 m) and NV = 120 for the short coil. Thus, we find Bp, = 33 x 10-° Wh, and the magnitude of the induces) emf is 0.16 V. Ohin’s law thea yidds 016 V/5.30 = 0.030 A. 8. (a) In the region of the smaller loop the magnetic field produced by the Jarger loop may be taken to be uniforun sud qual to its value at the center of thestualler bop, ou the axis, Eq, 30-29, wit (taken to be much greater than M2), gives boil? ae! where the 42 direction is upward in Fig. 31-96, The magnetic flux through the smaller loop is, to 4 goorl approximation, the product of this field and the area (nr) of the smaller loop: (b) The emf is given by Faraday’ law se (PE) E(4)- (HH) (38) (c) As the smaller locp moves upward, the fux through it decreases, and we have situation [ke that shown in Fig. $1-5(b). Theiuduced current will be dirsctal so as to produce a maiuetic fed that ‘8 upward through the smaller loop, in the same direction #s the field of the larger loep. Tt will he ‘counterclockwise as viewed from above, in the sare dizection as the current in the larger loop, 11. (a) Ohm's kaw combines with Faraday’s law to give i = 48 whore Ris the resistance ofthe coil In this case, ’=1 (itis asingle loop), and we integrate (fad the ears: 1 fi dbp [ow = 2 [a0 = ~ Paty Pa) ‘chic is equirlest to the expresion shown in the problem statement. We have used tse more Finn the fmanntal theorem of celeuhws no pattenar assumptions have been marke abst the integrations should be performed. The result is independent of the way 3 has changed. (0) Ifthe eurent is identically zero for ove the whole range 0 ¢ then certainly the let-hand side of our computation, above, gives ero, But the same result can come from the curret being in oue direction for, say, O—= $ and then in the opposite direction for ¢— tin such a war that ft So a vanishing integral docs not necasaily mean the integrand itself fs idetically zero. 13, From the result ofthe problem 11, 1 a(t) (Bas(0) ~ Bas(t)] SIRO) ~ Be) 1.20 x 10-8 me = Et a 1.007 — (-1.60)] = 2.95 «107? & STE [Lon = (-1.60'7)] = 205 x 10 15, (a) Let L be the length of a side of the square circuit, Then the magnetic flux through the cireuit is By = E2B/2, onc the inchuced ont is by ae a Te Now B= 0.012 0.8708 and dB /dt = —0.870T/s Thus, 2.0m)? (eat stor) = 174 ‘The magnetic field is out of the page and decreasing so the induced ef is counterclockwise around ‘the circuit, inthe same direction as the emafof the battery. The total emufis €-+¢, =20.0V-+174 V = aL7V. (b) The current is in the sense of the total exnf (counterclockwise). 17. (a) It should be emphasized that the result, given in terms of sin(2rft), could as easily be given in terius of cos(2z ft) oF even comnfl-+ G) where o ix a phase constant as discussed in Chapter 16 The angular position @ of the rotating coil measured from some refecence line (or plane), ancl ‘which line one chooses willatfect whether the magnetic thre should be written as BA cos6, BA sind or BAccs(6 + 6). Here our choice is such that by; = BA cosd. Since the coil is rotating steadily, increases linearly wich time. Thus, @ = wt (equivalent to @ = 2nft) if 8 is understood to be in radians (and w would be the anguhr velocity). Since the aros of the rectangular eoil is A = ab, Farexlay’s law leads to AIBA 00) yp gdvost nf) at = N Baldr fsin(n ft) which is the desired resuk, shown in the problem statement The second way this is written (Sosin(2r/¢)) is meant to emphasize that the voltage output is sinusoidal (iu its time dependence) and has an amplitude of &% = 2rf.Vabe. (b) We solve £5) = 150,V = 2 /NabB when f = 00.0 rev/s and B = 0.500 T. The three unknewns are Na, and b which occur in a product; thus, we obtain Nab= (.796 m2. This means, for instance, Una0 if we wanted the coll to have a square shape aud consist of 50 turas, then the side length of ‘the squace would he a= b= 0.126 1, 19, First we write ®,, = BAces#, We note that the angular pesition @ of the rotating coil is meastured from some reference line or plano, and we are implicitly making cuch a choice by writing the magnetic ux. as BAcos# (as opposed to, say, BAsin#). Since the coil i rotating steadily, @ increases lineacly with. ime, Thus, @-=w0 if @ is understood to be in mudiaus (here, w = 2rJ is the augular velocity of the coil in radians per second, and f = 1000rev/min ~ 16,7 rev/s is the frequency). Since the area of the reetanguiar coil is A = 0.500 « U3010 = 0.150 m#, Paraday’s law leads to {BA cox a doos(2nst) Te NBA’ fsinQnit) which means it has a voltage amplitude of (16.7 rev /s) (100 tums) (0.15 m2)(3.5T) = 5.50 x 10 21, Consider a (thin) strip of area of height dy and width £ = 0.020 ma, The strip is located atsome 0 < y <é The element of fu through the strip Is Aq = BAA = (44 u)(C dy) where SL units (and 2 significant figures) are understood, ‘To find the total Hux through the square loop, we integrate: be [evo [ (48 yt) dy =988 Thus, Faraday’s law yields At £= 25 s, we find the magnitude of the induced emf is 8.0 > 10 tlockwise, by Lenz's law V.lts “direction” (or “sense”) is 23. (a) We refee to the (very lange) wire length as L and seek to compute the flux per meter: 9yy/L. Using the right-band rule diseassed in Chapter 20, we sco tht ths uct fold in the zogion betwoenn ‘the axes of antiparallel curreats is the addition of the magnitudes of their individual fields, «= tgiven by Eq, 30-19 and Eq, 30-22. ‘There is an evident reflection syrametry in the problema, where the plane of symmetry is midway hetween the two wires (at what we will call x = 4/2, where = 20m = 0.0201); the net field at any point 0< 2 < ¢/2 is the same at its “mirror image polit € =r. The ceutral axis of ome of te wites pases through the origi, aud nat of the other pastes throush 2 = ¢, We make use of the syrumetry by integrating over 0 < a < £/2 and then inuttiplying by 2 2" pita +2 [" nae neaa [pas where d = 010025 m is the diameter of each wire, We will use R = d/2, and r instead of in the following stops. Thus, usiag the equations from Ch, 20 referred to above, we find Bo ieee) atta) = (8) tet) S02 x WPT + 108 x 10-8 Poa which yields ® y/L = 1.3 10° Tm of 1.8 x 10-% Wb/. (b) The flux (per meter) exiting within the regions of space aceupied by one oF the other wites was computed above to be 0.98 x 10-* Tuan. Ths, 0.23 10-5 Tm, Taxi Ta S017 17% (©) What was described in part (a) as a symmetry plane at 2 = ¢/2 is now (in the ease of parallel currents) a planeof vanishing fleld (the flelés subtract from each other in the region between thew, as the right-iand rule shows), The fax in the 0.< x < (/2 region is now of oppesite sign of the fhe in the #/2 <2

    Você também pode gostar