Arizona The Arizona counties with the overall worst election performance were Yuma, Coconino, and Pinal. Maricopa County also merits a mention for performing poorly on the rate of provisional ballots cast and rate of absentee ballots rejected, ‘Yuma and Pinal counties both performed very poorly on the overall registra: tion rate as well as voter turnout. Pinal had the worst registration rate in the state, while Yuma had the second-worst registration rate. On voter turnout, ‘Yuma performed the poorest, followed by Pinal. Both counties had voter turn: ut up to 25 percent lower than the state average. Meanwhile, Coconino County had the second-highest rate of provisional bal- lots castin the state, the second-highest rate of provisional ballots rejected, and the second-highest rate of voters removed from the voting rolls. Finally, Maricopa County stood out for having the highest rate of provisional ballots in the state. More than 37 percent of the ballots cast on Election Day 2012 in Maricopa County were provisional ballots—a rate that was 76 percent higher than the state average. 11. Center for American Progress Action Fund | Unequal Access 2012 Arizona voting law snapshot Voter registration: + Online registration option: Yes" + Same-day registration option: No® * Deadline: 29 days prior tothe election® Voting administration: The elections department in each ‘Arizona county is responsible for coordinating and administering Voter ID/residency require- ments: In addition to HAVA standards, Arizona voters were required to show proper identi- ‘ation at the polls. This consisted ‘of a photo ID or two forms of identification that bear the name and address ofthe elector!®‘Arizona: Best and worst counties County ankings fr each factorin parentheses, 1= wost-performing county Rate of Rateot Absentee Overall Voter provisional provisional ballot Voter state Voter registration ballots cast, ballotsre- rejection removal county rank —tumoutrate —rate,2012_—-2012——_—jected, 2012 rate, 2012, rate, 2012 oma 7 seme BLOTS) A) Coconino 2 SAS (6) BDH) RI) 233412) OKTHIA) TTL) Pinal 3 463%) 80281). 9H) TSSHLA) OHI). 123856) Navajo 4 517% UH) 9218609) 9HEH)4SHIT) OH). TH) Maricopa 5 S72%8) 0818) 71TH) aA) TH Mohave 6 46983) 73KG) BHI) RAT) ONS) 3.0% 5) Pima 7 Ses) 7388) SHS) ABNHIS) OHS) 82H) Yavaa 5 622%) IOHHLG) TSI) TRIB) SHHKH) THI) Cochise 9 535% (5) ST) 112) THI) «OST Soe eRe Paget ten Funan bandon a fer nS acon aan anton Sethe mete andnaee 12. Center for American Progress Action Fund | Unequal Access