Você está na página 1de 2

Table 3.3.

1 Narrative Reflection of Preassessment, Formative Assessments, and Summative Assessment (limited to 3 pages) Pre-assessment Most of the students identified the coins as money, but could not identify the coin by its appropriate name. The majority of the students had little prior knowledge of the material. This led to a revision of my lesson plans and activities to include more detailed and step-bystep instructions during direct instruction and more time for exploration. The results showed me my objectives for the unit were not previously accomplished by most students. The students knew the coins were money and could name some of the coins, but not correctly. This told me the objectives were within reach. The data led me to revise my lesson plans to include more detailed information and to add reinforcement activities. I decided to keep identification lessons all in the same format to make it simple for the students to understand. I provided activities for all types of lessons visual (worksheets), auditory (direct instruction), and kinesthetic (coin exploration). The subgroup and focus students will receive additional support and modifications to assist them with the material.

Overall analysis of results.

Discuss the results in reference to the learning objectives. Describe how pre-assessment data was used to proceed with instruction for all students. What is the plan to differentiate for all learners? Formative Assessment Overall analysis of results. Discuss the results in reference to the learning objectives. Are students learning what was intended they learn? Discuss any adaptations based on the results of formative assessments.

Through daily observation, choral responses, and worksheets, the students have demonstrated their understanding of the material. Objectives 1 and 2 are met by overall majority of students. The results showed main objectives 1 and 2 were successfully met by vast majority of students. Yes, the main objectives of the unit were coin identification and value identification, which were both met by the majority of the class. No actual adaptations were made for the lesson. More time was devoted to direct instruction, choral echoes and repetition were used, and worksheet/activity modifications were used for lower functioning students.

Identify differentiation needed to help all students meet the goals and objectives of this unit. Summative Assessment What did the disaggregated data of the assessment reveal? Discuss the results in reference to the learning objectives. Did all students learn what was intended they learn? Explain.

Worksheets were modified for lower functioning students. Instruction and activities were created for visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners.

The students who were at or above benchmark prior to the unit did excellent with this lesson. Those that were below benchmark struggled with the unit. Objectives 1 and 2 were met by 95% of the class. Objectives 3, 4, and 5 were met by 75% of the students. Objectives 1 and 2 were the main objectives of the unit needed to accomplish objectives 3, 4, and 5 95% learned what was intended coin/value identification.

Você também pode gostar