Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
&&&&&
Public School System
Traditional education in Cambodia was handled by the local wat, and the bonzes were the
teachers. The students were almost entirely young boys, and the education was limited to
memorizing Buddhist chants in Pali. During the period of the French protectorate, an educational
system based on the French model was inaugurated alongside the traditional system. Initially, the
French neglected education in Cambodia. Only seven high school students graduated in 1931,
and only 50,000 to 60,000 children were enrolled in primary school in 1936. In the year
immediately following independence, the number of students rapidly increased. Vickery suggests
that education of any kind was considered an "absolute good" by all Cambodians and that this
attitude eventually created a large group of unemployed or underemployed graduates by the late
1960s.
From the early twentieth century until 1975, the system of mass education operated on the French
model. The educational system was divided into primary, secondary, higher, and specialized
levels. Public education was under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, which exercised
full control over the entire system; it established syllabi, hired and paid teachers, provided
supplies, and inspected schools. An inspector of primary education, who had considerable
authority, was assigned to each province. Cultural committees under the Ministry of Education
were responsible for "enriching the Cambodian language."
Primary education, divided into two cycles of three years each, was carried out in state-run and
temple-run schools. Successful completion of a final state examination led to the award of a
certificate after each cycle. The primary education curriculum consisted of arithmetic, history,
ethics, civics, drafting, geography, hygiene, language, and science. In addition, the curriculum
included physical education and manual work. French language instruction began in the second
year. Khmer was the language of instruction in the first cycle, but French was used in the second
cycle and thereafter. By the early 1970s, Khmer was used more widely in primary education. In
the 1980s, primary school ran from the first to the fourth grade. Theoretically one primary school
served each village. Secondary education also was divided into two cycles, one of four years
taught at a college, followed by one of three years taught at a lycée. Upon completion of the first
cycle, students could take a state examination. Successful candidates received a secondary
diploma. Upon completion of the first two years of the second cycle, students could take a state
examination for the first baccalaureate, and, following their final year, they could take a similar
examination for the second baccalaureate. The Cambodian secondary curriculum was similar to
that found in France. Beginning in 1967, the last three years of secondary school were split up
into three sections according to major subjects--letters, mathematics and technology; agriculture;
and biology. In the late 1960s and the early 1970s, the country emphasized a technical education.
In the PRK, secondary education was reduced to six years.
Higher education lagged well behind primary and secondary education, until the late 1950s. The
only facility in the country for higher education before the 1960s was the National Institute of
Legal, Political, and Economic Studies, which trained civil servants. In the late 1950s, it had
about 250 students. Wealthy Cambodians and those who had government scholarships sought
university-level education abroad. Students attended schools in France, but after independence
increasing numbers enrolled at universities in the United States, Canada, China, the Soviet Union,
and the German Democratic Republic (East Germany). By 1970 universities with a total
enrollment of nearly 9,000 students served Cambodia. The largest, the University of Phnom
Penh, had nearly 4,570 male students and more than 730 female students in eight departments--
letters and humanities, science and technology, law and economics, medicine, pharmacy,
commercial science, teacher training, and higher teacher training. Universities operated in the
provinces of Kampong Cham, Takev, Batdambang; and in Phnom Penh, the University of
Agricultural Sciences and the University of Fine Arts offered training. The increased fighting
1. After the devastation of the Khmer Rouge period, the PRK tried to rebuild a national education
system:
with generous funding from international donors.
With almost total lack of resources both human and material
With an emphasis on quantity over quality
Using exclusively Vietnamese teachers
B and C above.
2. What percentage of the Cambodian population is basically illiterate (either completely illiterate
or semi-literate)? (year 2000 statistics)
5%
18 %
26 %
43 %
62 %
3. What changes in the 1990s have been important for the improvement of Cambodian education?
increased government spending, rebuilding of schools, reprinting of textbooks.
Increases in salaries for teachers
The opening of high quality private universities
A shift of funding responsibilities from parents to the government
All of the above.
4. The education of girls lags far behind that of boys in Cambodia, while they are nearly half
(46.2 %) of primary school students, in lower secondary school this drops to:
40 %
37 %
22 %
10 %
5. The reason parents give for why girls are kept at home is:
girls are needed for household chores.
It is not safe for girls to travel the longer distances to school
School is too expensive
All of the above.
Modern education progressed very slowly in Cambodia. The French colonial rulers did not pay
attention to educating Khmer. It was not until the late 1930s that the first high school opened.
However, after gaining independence from France, the government of Prince Norodom Sihanouk
made substantial progress in the field of education in the 1950s and 1960s. Elementary and
secondary education was expanded to various parts of the country, while higher learning
institutions such as vocational institutions, teacher-training centers and universities were
established. Unfortunately, the progress of these decades was obstructed by the civil war
following the overthrow of Prince Sihanouk in the 1970 and then destroyed by the Khmer Rouge
regime.
In an attempt to rebuild a new Cambodia with new revolutionary men and women, the Khmer
Rouge set out to eradicate the old elements of Cambodia’s society, including the old education
Buddhist Education
Before the French organized a Western-style educational system, the Buddhist wat, with monks
as teachers, provided the only formal education in Cambodia. The monks traditionally regarded
their main educational function as the teaching of Buddhist doctrine and history and the
importance of gaining merit. Other subjects were regarded as secondary. At the wat schools,
young boys--girls were not allowed to study in these institutions--were taught to read and to write
Khmer, and they were instructed in the rudiments of Buddhism.
In 1933 a secondary school system for novice monks was created within the Buddhist religious
system. Many wat schools had so-called Pali schools that provided three years of elementary
education from which the student could compete for entrance into the Buddhist lycées. Graduates
of these lycées could sit for the entrance examination to the Buddhist University in Phnom Penh.
The curriculum of the Buddhist schools consisted of the study of Pali, of Buddhist doctrine, and
of Khmer, along with mathematics, Cambodian history and geography, science, hygiene, civics,
and agriculture. Buddhist instruction was under the authority of the Ministry of Religion.
Nearly 600 Buddhist primary schools, with an enrollment of more than 10,000 novices and with
800 monks as instructors, existed in 1962. The Preah Suramarit Buddhist Lycée--a four-year
institution in Phnom Penh founded in 1955--included courses in Pali, in Sanskrit, and in Khmer,
as well as in many modern disciplines. In 1962 the student body numbered 680. The school's
graduates could continue their studies in the Preah Sihanouk Raj Buddhist University created in
1959. The university offered three cycles of instruction; the doctoral degree was awarded after
successful completion of the third cycle. In 1962 there were 107 students enrolled in the Buddhist
University. By the 1969-70 academic year, more than 27,000 students were attending Buddhist
religious elementary schools, 1,328 students were at Buddhist lycées, and 176 students were
enrolled at the Buddhist University.
The Buddhist Institute was a research institution formed in 1930 from the Royal Library. The
institute contained a library, record and photograph collections, and a museum. Several
commissions were part of the institute. A folklore commission published collections of
Education in Singapore
Singapore places huge emphasis on the education system as human talent is the most valuable
resource we have. Education is cheap, but where necessary, scholarships and bursaries are
provided for needy students from primary to tertiary levels. Starting from the age of 5, a student
typically goes through 2 years of kindergarten, 6 years of primary school, 4 years of secondary
school leading to the GCE O Level exams or 5 years for the GCE N Level exams, 2 years of
Junior College leading to the GCE A Levels, and 3 or 4 years of university education.
Alternatively, a student may opt to take a 3-year polytechnic diploma course instead of Junior
College - this does not preclude entry into University, but it does mean more competition since
less poly grads get this chance. Many who are able choose to study abroad.
Government Schools
Children of expatriates residing in Singapore on employment passes or skilled work permits can
apply for admission to government or aided schools. School fees in these schools are pegged at
$3 a month for primary pupils and $5 a month for secondary students, and are much lower than
those in private schools. Children whose parents are not employment pass holders, skilled work
permit holders or permanent residents will need to apply for student passes through the Foreign
Student Unit, Ministry of Education.
The parent/guardian will receive a Letter of Certification within seven working days of the
submission of the application. By presenting the Letter of Certification, the parent may contact
the school of their choice to apply for an assessment test, the dates of which are decided by the
school. Acceptance by the school will depend on the results of the test and the student's age. If
the student is accepted, the Foreign Students Unit will send a letter requesting a contribution to
the Education Fund. Malaysians must contribute $3,000 for primary education, secondary and
pre-university education, while parents of other nationalities must contribute $5,000.
The Student Pass can then be obtained from the Immigration Department with the Letter of
Approval. (Foreign students can report for school admission only after obtaining the Student
Pass.)
For admission to kindergartens, private schools, universities and polytechnics, applcations can be
made directly to the school, and the contribution to the Education Fund is not required.
International Schools
Note: As well as the listing below, please check out our comparison between current
international schools, which is subject to update as more schools submit their details. Have a look
here.
American College
Australian International School
British Association of Singapore Nursery School
Canadian International School
Chatsworth International School
Dover Court Preparatory School
Dutch School
Eton House (ages 2-7)
German School Singapore
International Community School
ISS International School (Lower School)
Japanese Education
Lucien Ellington
October 2001
It is important for teachers and students to develop a broad understanding of Japanese education.
Americans who are knowledgeable of teaching and learning in Japan gain insights about a
different culture and are better able to clearly think about our own educational system. This
digest is an introductory overview of 1) Japanese educational achievements, 2) the structure and
curriculum of K-12 Japanese education, 3) Japanese higher education, 4) adult education in
Japan, and 5) educational reform.
Japanese Educational Achievements. Japan's greatest educational achievement is the high-
quality basic education most young people receive by the time they complete high school. In
international mathematics tests, Japanese students rank either at, or near, the top year after year.
Recent statistics indicate that well over 95 percent of Japanese are literate, which is particularly
impressive since the Japanese language is one of the world's most difficult languages to read and
write. Over 95 percent of Japanese also graduate from high school compared to 88 percent of
American students. Some Japanese education specialists estimate that the average Japanese high
school graduate has attained about the same level of education as the average American after two
years of college. Japanese employees of large companies and government ministries rank among
the most well-educated workers on earth.
Japanese K-12 Education. Even though the Japanese adopted the American 6-3-3 model during
the U.S. Occupation after World War II, elementary and secondary education is much more
centralized than in the United States. Control over curriculum rests largely with the national
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Monbukagakusho) and
education is compulsory through the ninth grade. Municipalities and private sources fund
kindergartens, but national, prefectural, and local governments pay almost equal shares of
educational costs for students in grades one through nine. Well over 90 percent of students attend
public schools through the ninth grade, but over 25 percent of students go to private high schools.
The percentage of national funding for high schools is quite low, with prefectures and
municipalities assuming most of the costs for public high schools. There are important
differences in Japanese and American teachers and administrators. High salaries, relatively high
prestige, and very low birth rates make teaching jobs quite difficult to obtain in Japan while in the
United States there are increasing teacher shortages. While more Japanese schools are acquiring
specialists such as special education teachers and counselors, American schools have many more
special subjects and support personnel than is the case in Japan. The typical Japanese school has
only two administrators: a principal and a head teacher.
Japanese students spend at least six weeks longer in school each year than their American
counterparts since summer vacations in Japan only last half the time of most summer breaks in
the U.S. Until the mid-1990s Japanese students attended school half days on Saturday, but
weekend attendance is being gradually phased out and all Saturday school will terminate by the
beginning of the 2002 school year in April.
While the Japanese K-12 curriculum is actually quite similar in many respects to the curriculum
of U.S. schools, there are important differences. Because Japanese teachers at all levels are better
prepared in mathematics than their American counterparts, instruction in that subject is more
Education in the Workplace and for Personal Growth. Large Japanese companies and
government ministries normally provide employees with superb education and training. A major
reason for this has been that Japanese workers are traditionally much less likely to change jobs as
many times during their careers as Western employees. Increasingly though, there are signs this
pattern is beginning to change. Most education and training in the large institutions takes place
within the Japanese firm or ministry. Two major kinds of workplace education are job rotation,
which both white-and blue-collar workers experience, and the deliberate practice by management
of disseminating information in the form of reports, papers, and work-related periodical articles
to all employees.
Many Japanese adults also continue to learn for personal growth. Reading is extremely popular
and almost as many books are published annually in Japan as in the United States, even though
Japan has about half the American population. Most Japanese adults pride themselves in having
hobbies that they cultivate for life. Many of these hobbies, such as the mastery of a musical
instrument or the study of conversational English, involve the acquisition of new information.
Cultural centers and centers where elderly people can engage in continuing education are quite
popular in Japan.
Table 1.
Institutions of Higher Education
by Establishing Body, 1986
Prefectura
Total National Private
l
Technical Colleges 62 54 4 4
Junior Colleges 548 37 52 459
Universities 465 95 36 334
Special Training Schools 3,088 174 176 2,738
Miscellaneous Schools 4,124 8 102 4,014
Correspondence Junior Colleges 10 - - 10
Correspondence Universities 13 1 12
Table 2.
Enrollment in Institutions of Higher
Education by Gender
Total Male Female
Technical Colleges 49,174 47,151 2,023
Junior Colleges 396,455 38,554 357,901
Universities 1,879,532 1,426,851 452,681
Special Training Schools 587,609 255,297 332,312
Miscellaneous Schools 483,439 238,794 244,645
Correspondence Junior Colleges 61,435 46,923 14,512
Correspondence Universities 113,481 63,041 50,440
Table 2 summarizes enrollment by gender. As can be seen, there is a much higher representation
of women in junior colleges. This is largely due to a combination of personal choice and societal
expectations. Through high school, Japanese females compete favorably with males in all
academic subjects, including mathematics and science. But as young women plan their future,
many decide to restrict their academic careers in favor of a path that will get them into the labor
market more quickly and provide them with more work experience before marriage, which for
the average Japanese woman occurs at around age 25. Thus, for young women who seek full-time
work followed by full-time marriage, junior college is an attractive option. On the other hand, an
increasing number of contemporary Japanese women expect to continue their careers after
marriage, and for them a four-year college education may be preferable.
With the increase in the scale of secondary education, more Japanese young people have the
basic academic background necessary to compete for entrance to the top universities, and over
Introduction
Australia maintains an education system that is not only unique and effective, but also successful
and affordable for students from all walks of life. Each state and territory in Australia
independently runs their own form of education from grades 1 - 12. This article will mainly
discuss the New South Wales and Queensland education systems.
The primary advantage of allowing states to operate their education system independently is that
it allows for implementation of change at much faster rate. As a result, throughout the years,
education in each state has evolved into more fairer and efficient systems.
In some states, school attendance is compulsory from grade 1 whilst in others from kindergarten.
However, in all states, students must complete grade 10 after which they receive their Junior
Certificate (SSC). Most students go straight on to complete Grades 11 and 12 and obtain their
Senior Certificate (HSC). Year 12 or Adult Matriculation is necessary if students want to go on to
higher education courses at universities, and also necessary for some Technical And Further
Education centres (TAFEs) and private commercial courses.
To enroll in grade 1/kindergarten, students must be 6 years of age or turn 6 during the school year
they intend to enroll. As such, generally students are either 17 or 18 by the time they leave grade
12.
There are three main types of schools in Australia, namely, public schools, non-religious private
school and religious (mainly Catholic or Anglican) private school. Most public schools have co-
education, however there are a few public same sex high schools in the larger cities like Sydney
and Melbourne. Most of the private schools on the other hand are however same sex schools.
Assessment
Unlike Bangladesh, during the primary school years (age 6 - 12), the workload given to students
is very minimal, the main focus being to develop the child's basic foundation of knowledge and
building on their learning abilities. Very little stress, in terms of workload and competition, is
given to children during these early years. Gradually during the high school and college years, the
workload is increased both in terms of amount of information taught and assessment.
The main difference between schooling in Bangladesh and most states in Australia is the
assessment method of SSC and HSC. In Australia, the results of SSC do not impact the student's
academic record greatly; it is the results of the HSC, as in many countries, is the most important.
Probably one of the most unique and complex systems of assessment in the world would be the
one implemented by the Queensland Education board. Instead of grading a student based on a set
of exams completed at the end of grade 12, the final result is taken from the student's overall
performance in all exams throughout grades 11 and 12.
Additionally, each subject offered by the board is given a specific weight; the harder a particular
subject is, the more weight is assigned. For example, Physics would be given a higher weight
than say for example, Accounting. This weight would then be used in conjunction with the
students result for the subject to standardize the students' overall performance. Based on this
information, students are given a rank within his or her school. As the rank is standardized based
on the weight of the subject, all students, regardless of what type of subjects they study can be
ranked within the one list.
Although a standard curriculum is set by the board of education, assessments of all subjects differ
from school to school as the schools conduct them independently. As such, in order to
standardize all school students together, one common exam is required to be undertaken by all
grade 12 students each year. This exam, known as the Core Skills Test, is not a knowledge based
exam but rather a skills based exam in which students are graded from A (highest) to E (lowest).
The generic test examines the student's analytic, deductive, and logic skills. There is no direct
bearing on the actual results of the exam for the student; however, the results are used
collectively to calculate the level of competition within schools. For example, a school with 80%
"A" result has more bright students than a school with say 40% "A" results. This information is
The benefits of this system are that it takes into consideration the amount of effort required to
attain high marks in a particular subject. However, the obvious weakness is that it is extremely
complex to compute and it becomes substantially harder for a student to get a good rank position
if he or she attends an average school.
Tertiary Education
There are 39 universities in Australia ranging from 3,000 students to 30,000 students. Of these,
only 2 are private universities. Attendance to university courses require cut off marks from HSC;
however, generally speaking students within the top 50% can gain attendance to a university.
University fees for undergraduate degrees can be paid upfront or they can be deferred. In cases of
deferred fees, the Government pays the tuition fees initially, and when the student graduates and
starts earning a threshold salary, he or she repays the fees gradually.
The State and Territory Governments have the responsibility for most education and training,
including the administration and substantial funding of primary and secondary education, as well
as the administration and major funding of Vocational Education and Training (VET).
The Commonwealth Government is responsible for funding of higher education institutions, and
provides supplementary funding for schools and for VET. The Commonwealth Government also
provides special grants to the States and Territories for areas of particular need. Apart from its
significant financial role, the Commonwealth is also involved in promoting national consistency
and coherence in the provision of education and training across Australia.
On an accrual basis, the primary and secondary education expenses of Australian governments
totaled $18,455m in 1999-2000.
Table 1.0 EDUCATION OPERATING EXPENSES INCURRED BY GOVERNMENT, By
Purpose - 1999-2000
Purpose Commonwealth $m State and local $m Australia $m
Primary and secondary
5,330 17,752 18,455
education
Tertiary education
University education 3,046 84 9,377
Technical and further
1,292 3,152 3,501
education
Tertiary education nec. 233 63 13,173
Preschool, special, and
273 998 1,111
other education
Transportation of
- 817 817
students
Other education
123 357 480
expenses
Total education
10,299 23,225 34,036
operating exp.
Source: ABS data available on request, Public Finance collection.
Probably one of the main weaknesses of the education system in Australia is the widening gap of
quality of education between public and private schools. This has resulted in a heavy reliance on
private schools and a lack of faith in the public schooling system. In recent years, there has been
substantially more growth in the enrollments in private schools than in public. This is mainly due
to the fact that students who attend private schools are more likely to complete Year 12, get better
results, have higher rates of university entry, and lower rates of unemployment.
More importantly however, one of the main strengths of the education system in Australia is the
equal opportunity for all students, regardless of financial background to have access to a good
education up to and including tertiary levels.
For more details of the costs of education and living in UK and comparisons of costs of education
in UK with other countries, check out the Expenses & Fees for International Students section.
Primary school
American children start school at the age of five years. The first year at school is called
kindergarten. It is required of all American children enrolled in the American education system.
The second year at school is considered the first year of primary school and is referred to as first
grade. In America, the word grade has two meanings: (1) the score achieved on an exam or in a
course, and (2) a year of education in primary or secondary school. Primary school most
commonly consists of five years of education, referred to as first through fifth grades.
Secondary school
Upon completion of fifth grade (the last year of primary school), American children enrolled in
the American education system advance to secondary school. Secondary school most commonly
consists of a total of seven years, referred to as sixth through twelfth grades. The ninth through
twelfth grades are most commonly referred to as high school. Upon completion of twelfth grade,
American students are awarded a certificate called the high school diploma. In the American
education system, students must have obtained a high school diploma before they are admitted
into college or university. Foreign students who would like to attend an American college or
university must have completed coursework that is equivalent to what is taught at an American
high school. Foreign students who would like to attend an American high school, need to
consider how the high school they select will give them access to the best colleges. You can also
click here to learn about some of the finest boarding schools in the American education system.
Undergraduate school
Students who have completed high school and would like to attend college or university must
attend what is referred to as an undergraduate school. These are schools that offer either a two-
year degree (called an associate degree) or a four-year degree (called a bachelor’s degree) in a
specific course of study. That course of study is called the major. While most schools that offer a
four-year degree will admit students who have not yet chosen a major, all students are required to
select (or declare) a major by their second year at school. Students who complete an associate
degree can continue their education at a four-year school and eventually complete a bachelor’s
degree.
"The economic well-being of the nation depends on the presence of a large number of
men who are content to labor hard all day long. Because men are naturally lazy they will
not work unless forced by necessity to do so. The education of the poor threatens to rob
the nation of their productivity... Every hour those poor people spend at their books is so
much time lost to society. Going to school in comparison to working is idleness."
The "High Cabal" wanted a working class that was merely trained to do a particular job,
not think about social or political issues. They created an educational system focused on
training instead of learning, which took its lead from such physiological, materialistic
"psychologists" as Wilhelm Wundt, G. Stanley Hall, James McKeen Cattell, E. L.
Thorndike, and others.
G. Stanley Hall was the first of Wundt's disciples to return from Leipzig in 1883. Hall
joined the faculty of Baltimore's new Johns Hopkins University, which was being
established after the model of the German universities. Hall organized the psychology
laboratory at Johns Hopkins and, in 1887, established the American Journal of Psychology.
In 1889, when Clark University was established in Worcester, Massachusetts, Hall was
chosen to be its first president.
In 1892 Hall played a leading role in founding the American Psychological Association. Hall
became known for his studies of child development and in 1904 published his two-volume
Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relation to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex,
Crime, Religion, and Education, welding experimental psychology to child education.
We can get a clear idea of the new meaning of Wundtian-defined American education by
examining Hall's definition of educational practice.
"We must overcome the fetishism of the alphabet, of the multiplication tables, of
grammars, of scales, and of bibliolatry . . . it would be no serious loss if a child never
learned to read." (emphasis added)
"Secret knowledge is the basis of all power. Your source of information depends upon
who you are and what position you hold in society. Your source of information
determines the reliability of what you know."
Steven Jacobson, Mind Control in the United States
• the New Century Dictionary of the English Language (1927) defined education as:
"the drawing out of a person's innate talents and abilities by imparting the
knowledge of languages, scientific reasoning, history, literature, rhetoric, etc.--the
channels through which those abilities would flourish and serve."
"The most controversial issues of the twenty-first century will pertain to the ends
and means of modifying human behavior and who shall determine them. The first
educational question will not be 'what knowedge is of the the most worth?' but 'what
kinds of human beings do we wish to produce?' The possibilities virtually defy our
imagination."
The future role of literacy in the workplace has been succinctly stated by Pierre
Dogan, the president of Granite Communications, a company that is now
'developing software for hotel housekeeping.' It seems that 'so long as maids can
read room numbers, they will be able to check off tasks completed or order supplies
by simply touching pictures on the screen." Dogan points out that 'you can create a
work program with prompting including iconic [picture] messages.' In fact, he
logically concludes, 'you can use an illiterate workforce.'javascript:Remote();
Supreme Court Justice Breyer, who dissented from the 5-4 ruling, predicted that the
decision would prove highly divisive in a country with "more then 55 different religious
groups." He foresees many struggles, asking, "How will the public react to government
funding for schools that take controversial religious positions on topics that are of
current popular interest--say, the conflict in the Middle East or the war on terrorism?"
In the nineteenth century these democratic principles were advanced by such reformers
as Horace Mann, who wrote in 1848:
“If one class possesses all the wealth and the education, while the residue of
society is ignorant and poor, it matters not by what name the relation
between them may be called; the latter, in fact and in truth, will be the servile
dependents and subjects of the former.”
In the early part of the twentieth century, the working class took up the fight for public
education, which was inseparable from the campaign against child labor. However it
was only through the civil rights struggles, from the 1930s through 1960s, that universal
access to the public schools was fully achieved.
Now, in the twenty-first century the right to sound public education for the working
class has come into collision with the plans of the "High Cabal" for a society primarily
for the benefit of the wealthy. The rampant growth of class inequality has produced a
state of affairs that is fundamentally incompatible with democratic principles, which are
based on the equal rights of all citizens.
The whole issue of public money for ideologically-based schools will prove extremely
divisive throughout the nation. The Republicans, the majority of whom support
vouchers, will use the issue as a way to attack any Democrat who opposes vouchers as a
tool of the teacher unions.
FPRIVATE "TYPE=PICT;ALT=A new birth of freedom"
Americans are rapidly losing a sense of the traditional American values. Anti-
intellectual, racist or right-wing multiculturalism has replaced education, bought-and-
paid-for-politics has replaced democracy, funneling billions to the fat-cats has replaced
statesmanship, and attacks on constitutional liberties has replaced political and judicial
oversight.
Americans must now awaken to this horror and once again, if possible, create a public
education system which will become the means to transmit to future generations an
understanding of the hidden meaning of events and lost democratic concepts. If the
ravages that the "High Cabal" have wreaked on the public school system are so
fundamental that we cannot rejuvenate it, we may have to create our own private
"democracy schools" to help us regain our sense, our ability to see what's happening,
our intelligence. When our nation was founded, education was carried on primarily
through just such private home schools where Americans learned the values of a
democratic way of life.
Initially, every student would have unlimited choice of which school to attend. As long as a
student reasonably followed generally acceptable social rules in his/her conduct, that choice
would remain unlimited. However, if a student exhibits violent behavior, or regularly behaves
disruptively, or regularly and openly flaunts the established rules of society and school, that
choice would become restricted. No Principal or teacher would determine or control such a
limitation; the student would. And, even if a student's behavior caused attendance at a specific
school, a number of ways are always available for him/her to earn enough respect to again have
broader choice.
A central premise here is that there are some students that need to learn very basic inter-personal
skills in order to eventually become part of adult society. Existing public school systems don't
have very effective ways of dealing with such students, and they tend to represent danger and
disruption for an educational environment. Once such students learn adequate behavior skills
(and attitudes), such students could become welcome participants in any classroom. This essay is
meant to offer a possibility in that direction.
Nearly all potential "solutions" for the terrible situation of the American public school system
seem to be "top-down" concepts. A central bureaucracy decides the rules and conditions (and
money) and then they try to impose that somewhat artificial environment on masses of students.
Won't work! People, students, are a diverse lot! Rigid structures and rules will always fail. In
addition, the whole concept of education is far more complicated than normally perceived. Rather
than a teacher jamming thoughts into students' heads, it is crucially important to enable the many
The American public school system faces an assortment of huge obstacles. Many students are
apathetic. Some teachers are unmotivated or incompetent. Some schools include physically
dangerous environments. All school administrators are limited by various discrimination laws in
doing much about any of this. As a result, many parents have concerns for the safety and the
education of their children. Many feel that their only valid choices are to send their kids to private
school or to move to a house in a district or town known for adequate school system
performance.
There IS another alternative! The public school system COULD respond appropriately to the
diversity of school children WITHOUT discriminating against anyone! ALL students will be able
to receive the best possible education for that student. The cost to accomplish this can be very
reasonable --- it might even be LESS EXPENSIVE overall than existing system expenditures!
Students would attend one of three physically separate, different schools, NOT dependent on
educational achievement or ability or test results (which would be potentially discriminatory) but
rather, dependent on a number of aspects of behavior. Students that generally do their
homework and attend classes and behave reasonably would always have the choice to
transfer to whichever school he/she chooses. Often, that might be the high-motivation
school, that could accomplish the most educating, because there would be very few
disruptions or incidents of violence there. Even students that had extremely low grades or test
scores could attend that school, as long as their BQ (Behavior Quotient) was satisfactory (see
below). Low-achieving students can often thrive in such a motivating environment, and mixtures
of students of different achievement levels would probably be good for all of the students.
The intermediate-motivation school would have many "normal behavior" students. The third
school would be where disruptive or violent or totally unmotivated students would attend class,
and that school WOULD have metal detectors and extremely strict discipline. Each school year in
a student's education would be treated separately, so a student in the trouble-makers' school who
matured and discovered motivation, could begin to consistently do his/her homework and attend
classes and behave in a civil manner, and he/she would be given the choice to attend one of the
other two schools the following year. Motivated students, of all educational abilities, would
have the opportunity to attend school in a motivated, vibrant, safe educational
environment.
(There are no precise ways of describing these three school environments. I have chosen to use
levels of motivation to describe them, but that would not always be the case. An extremely
motivated, extremely intelligent, but extremely disruptive student could certainly wind up in the
lo-mot school. Similarly, a well-behaved, possibly quiet, student with limited ability and minimal
motivation could easily spend an entire education in the hi-mot school.)
Anyone who has interacted with the Public School system quickly sees the great diversity of
motivations and abilities of students. Up to about thirty years ago, students were "tracked" into
classes with other students with similar education and ability. This situation allowed teachers to
teach at a rate fast enough to not bore the students but slow enough to allow most to grasp each
subject area. Then, the Federal courts felt that minority school children were being effectively
discriminated against by this system. The courts found that such children were commonly tracked
together in the "lower tracks" due to poor performance on standardized IQ-type tests. When a
teacher taught such a class, it was felt that possibly less effort would be expended in teaching
them. Whether or not that was true, the conclusion was that such tests were biased TOWARD
white children and AGAINST minorities who may be less proficient at taking tests. The net
effect of all this was to make "tracking" illegal. All students were to be distributed equally and
Most people argue about who is to blame for causing such disruptive and dangerous behaviors,
and they blame TV, movies, graphic news, lax parents, lack of role models, etc. Any or all of that
might be true, but American society doesn't have any way of greatly improving any of those
factors, even if they ARE valid. The ideas presented in this essay essentially concede that such
students are going to exist because of the attitudes of modern American society. It just seems
obvious to me to collect such disruptive (and often dangerous) students together in one place (a
separate school) where intense discipline could be applied. After all, eventually, those students
will be out in society, and if they never learn responsibility and consequences and discipline, they
will be society's problems throughout their adulthood. If they are put in an environment that is
essentially a Military School, they might learn acceptable social behaviors. They certainly do not
have any incentive to learn such things in the modern environments of Public Schools. At the
same time, the remaining students (and teachers) would be able to be in an environment where
productive educational learning could flourish. Given the circumstances, it seems like an obvious
direction to try.
I just wish to help in any way possible to improve a terrible situation, and I am surprised at the
many "shallow" approaches that are commonly tried. The ones that show much effect tend to be
incredibly expensive, in some cases being on the order of $40,000 per student per school year.
For less than that, a school district could hire individual personal live-in tutors for each of the
students! Such "demonstrations" will obviously show positive results, but they are impracticably
expensive for large scale application. The approach of this essay uses existing schools, existing
teachers, and existing materials and equipment, and it is certain to show spectacular
improvements in test scores of the "peaceful" schools and possibly even in the "problem
children" schools, too.
Traditionally, it would have been unimaginable if a school student would interrupt an instructor's
lesson by standing up, walking over, and punching another student. The offending student would
be seriously punished, and possibly expelled from that school. In modern American classrooms,
students all know that the teachers are not allowed to strike or even touch them, because some
teachers have been sent to jail for doing so. They also know that the school administration will
only fill out some paperwork about the matter and send the student right back to the same
classroom, essentially without punishment, and often, without even any reprimand. It is amazing.
The instructor is often NOT in charge of the classroom. In America, in most Public School
classrooms, at least 10 of the students believe that they can do absolutely anything they please,
and the instructor is considered a minor part of the control dynamics. With peer pressures
important for young kids, their various actions tend to encourage each other to more and more
disruptive behavior, which often escalates to actual physical violence. And the instructor cannot
even get involved to try to establish control, and becomes a bystander.
.
The modern American educational system is filled with an assortment of problems. Many
students are not learning much at all. Most students are graduating with less knowledge and
capability than similar students in other industrialized countries. Classroom disruptions are
surprisingly common. School violence is rampant, including the many violent incidents we all
hear about in the news. Even violence on school buses is a tremendous problem.
What is the answer?
In general, the common approaches are to throw money at the problems, and to establish very
broad guidelines and laws to solve individual problems of the system. Regarding performance
issues, the teachers are generally blamed, and so better selection of teachers and better teacher
training are publicly called for. Regarding violence, metal detectors and uniformed police officers
roaming the halls are the common "solution." In addition, everyone demands newer, bigger, more
advanced school complexes.
These are all bureaucratic attempts at solutions for problems that arise on a very individual basis.
Essentially, some "expert" in an ivory tower somewhere believes he/she has a universal solution
for a problem he/she never actually faced in a classroom. Such "experts" have no idea of the
emotions that erupt in the classroom, including the teacher, when violent behavior begins. It is a
peculiar and frustrating situation to be a teacher a few feet away from two fighting students,
knowing that even touching either one could send you to jail. I doubt if many of the "experts"
know that feeling.
Such "top-down" approaches to establishing a peaceful and safe and productive environment in
Considering the tens of thousands of (public) schools in America, the total financial cost of each
of the proposed "top-down" approaches is staggering. And, unfortunately, the likely benefit of
each of these approaches is minimal. Yes, metal detectors at school entrances might keep most
weapons out of the school buildings, and uniformed police walking the halls might lessen the
number of violent incidents. What would keep an angry, vindictive adolescent from waiting
outside, as happened several years ago in the South, where some kids waited outside with
weapons to pick off children leaving school? All of the expensive solutions suggested have
similar likelihood of success. They may reduce some aspects of symptoms of a problem, but a
related, different problem will arise as a result, such that very little real advantage actually
results.
I find a similar situation already existing in most courthouse buildings today. A few incidents of
violence had occurred in courtrooms over the years, so laws were passed where courthouses now
have metal detectors and a lot of security personnel. This is VERY expensive! Is it for OUR
benefit, to keep us safer in the building? Apparently not, because people are still shot outside
such buildings. The Judges are probably safer now, especially since they look so different out of
their robes and since they enter and leave the building by a separate private entrance. But the
millions of dollars of expense for every one of those large public buildings has almost no benefit
for the public. And it has a tremendous downside attached to it. I do not like to have to do any
business in such buildings, because of the over-bearing feeling of military-style authority that
seems to pervade the environment there. I also don't enjoy being frisk searched, under the
assumption that I am a potential criminal.
Is that the environment that would be conducive to young minds being open and receptive to new
educational ideas? Not a chance! Instead, it foments an atmosphere that minimizes creative
thought or intellectual growth, very much like our military branches INTENTIONALLY do
during boot camp or basic training. As soon as metal detectors and an obvious police presence
exist, the light, airy environment necessary to effective learning evaporates.
IF you work in an office somewhere, do you think you'd get your work done as efficiently if you
continuously saw an armed Police Officer out of the corner of your eye? You might for a little
while, out of a fear factor. But, soon, you would likely have an indescribable feeling similar to
paranoia, whether regarding the permanent reminder of the possible threat the Officer is supposed
to thwart, or because of his presence itself. Your clarity of thinking, your creativity, your overall
efficiency, your learning of new skills, would all certainly degrade. Just because he was there.
This is the real world. Bad things sometimes happen. There are bad people. In principle, we could
each hire permanent armed guards to stand outside our homes, 24/7. We could do the same for
our vehicles. Is this the future we are looking toward?
Should we live every moment of every day, dreadful of the multitudes of dangers and threats "out
there"? Should we provide a public school environment that inculcates this attitude into our
young people? I hope the answers are no.
Does this mean that there is no answer to the problems?
Not at all.
I taught high school in Illinois for four years some time back, before I started my manufacturing
business. I might have stayed in teaching, if it hadn't been for one characteristic that was in the
The "junior" and "senior," or third and fourth years, are the "upper classes." Students in these
years are known as "juniors" and "seniors"- "upperclassmen." When they enter their junior year,
they must choose a "major" field of study. They must take a certain number of courses in this
department, or field. In some schools, students also choose a "minor" field. There is usually time
for students to choose several other "elective" (extra) courses in other subjects.
Each student is assigned a "faculty advisor" who teaches courses in the student's major field.
This advisor helps the student select a program of study.
An international student will also have an "International Student Advisor." This person helps
the international students adjust to U.S. life, handles visa and other paperwork problems, and
organizes activities for international students.
Classroom learning: Classes range from large lectures for several hundred students to smaller
classes and "seminars" (discussion classes) with only a few students. Students enrolled in lecture
courses are often divided into smaller groups, or "sections." The sections meet separately to
discuss the lecture topics and other material.
Professors usually assign textbook and other readings each week. They also require several
written reports each semester (term). You will be expected to keep up to date with the required
readings in order to join in class discussions and to understand the lectures. Science students are