Scribd Logo
Fazer o upload

Bem-vindo(a) ao Scribd!

  • I520 '426' Flags Email - Kevin Mede - Redacted

    Enviado por

    PRMurphy
    165 visualizações1 página
    i520 '426' Flags Email - Kevin Mede - Redacted My original email is in the middle area of Kevin's response. There are many examples of this, but this is another fine example of Mede saying one thing, agreeing with me, at least in writing, but doing different and later claiming something else entirely. ie; Hell's Angels 'conspiracy theory.' Now I spoke with Kevin and I showed him exactly what I am referring to in this email. Kevin acknowledged what I told him, he affirmed the source of the information and agreed that it was peculiar that Whatcom County was identifying Bandidos, Amigo's, Canyon Riders etc (red & gold clubs) in the county database as such, but that Hell's Angels were not being identified the same way. Now a person can have their views on these 1%'er clubs and we don't even need to agree with what they are or what they are not, but I would think that most of us would agree that if you're going to flag one club as dangerous and worthy of special handling, then you probably should be handling both sets as such. Kevin agreed. At least as of the point in time of this email. That was until he was 'convinced' of the necessity to change his mind and adopt Elfo's 'conspiracy theory' narrative. To the best of my knowledge, the HA members, transients and affiliates that have been contacted in this area have still not been identified in i520 and Kevin never did get back to me. Probably too busy getting ready for his Elfo campaign video I guess. Side note: This individual just happened to be the only person in the area of an intercepted helicopter air drop (drugs) when he was contacted. Strange coincidence huh? Update 04-24-14: It just occurred to me that most readers probably won't know what a '426 flag' is. It's a police clearing/dispatch code that means gang member, gang activity or gang affiliate. The county police database system (i520) uses such codes and certain people are 'flagged' with a flashing red asterisk next to their names to let officers know that there may be a higher officer safety (OFS) risk associated with those individuals. The point of this communication was that there's a discrepancy if one group is flagged and another like group is not. If one should be, then they all should be.

    Título original

    i520 '426' Flags Email - Kevin Mede - Redacted

    Direitos autorais

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formatos disponíveis

    PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

    Você considera este documento útil?

    Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

    Denunciar este documento
    i520 '426' Flags Email - Kevin Mede - Redacted My original email is in the middle area of Kevin's response. There are many examples of this, but this is another fine example of Mede saying one thing, agreeing with me, at least in writing, but doing different and later claiming something else entirely. ie; Hell's Angels 'conspiracy theory.' Now I spoke with Kevin and I showed him exactly what I am referring to in this email. Kevin acknowledged what I told him, he affirmed the source of the information and agreed that it was peculiar that Whatcom County was identifying Bandidos, Amigo's, Canyon Riders etc (red & gold clubs) in the county database as such, but that Hell's Angels were not being identified the same way. Now a person can have their views on these 1%'er clubs and we don't even need to agree with what they are or what they are not, but I would think that most of us would agree that if you're going to flag one club as dangerous and worthy of special handling, then you probably should be handling both sets as such. Kevin agreed. At least as of the point in time of this email. That was until he was 'convinced' of the necessity to change his mind and adopt Elfo's 'conspiracy theory' narrative. To the best of my knowledge, the HA members, transients and affiliates that have been contacted in this area have still not been identified in i520 and Kevin never did get back to me. Probably too busy getting ready for his Elfo campaign video I guess. Side note: This individual just happened to be the only person in the area of an intercepted helicopter air drop (drugs) when he was contacted. Strange coincidence huh? Update 04-24-14: It just occurred to me that most readers probably won't know what a '426 flag' is. It's a police clearing/dispatch code that means gang member, gang activity or gang affiliate. The county police database system (i520) uses such codes and certain people are 'flagged' with a flashing red asterisk next to their names to let officers know that there may be a higher officer safety (OFS) risk associated with those individuals. The point of this communication was that there's a discrepancy if one group is flagged and another like group is not. If one should be, then they all should be.

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    165 visualizações1 página

    I520 '426' Flags Email - Kevin Mede - Redacted

    Enviado por

    PRMurphy
    i520 '426' Flags Email - Kevin Mede - Redacted My original email is in the middle area of Kevin's response. There are many examples of this, but this is another fine example of Mede saying one thing, agreeing with me, at least in writing, but doing different and later claiming something else entirely. ie; Hell's Angels 'conspiracy theory.' Now I spoke with Kevin and I showed him exactly what I am referring to in this email. Kevin acknowledged what I told him, he affirmed the source of the information and agreed that it was peculiar that Whatcom County was identifying Bandidos, Amigo's, Canyon Riders etc (red & gold clubs) in the county database as such, but that Hell's Angels were not being identified the same way. Now a person can have their views on these 1%'er clubs and we don't even need to agree with what they are or what they are not, but I would think that most of us would agree that if you're going to flag one club as dangerous and worthy of special handling, then you probably should be handling both sets as such. Kevin agreed. At least as of the point in time of this email. That was until he was 'convinced' of the necessity to change his mind and adopt Elfo's 'conspiracy theory' narrative. To the best of my knowledge, the HA members, transients and affiliates that have been contacted in this area have still not been identified in i520 and Kevin never did get back to me. Probably too busy getting ready for his Elfo campaign video I guess. Side note: This individual just happened to be the only person in the area of an intercepted helicopter air drop (drugs) when he was contacted. Strange coincidence huh? Update 04-24-14: It just occurred to me that most readers probably won't know what a '426 flag' is. It's a police clearing/dispatch code that means gang member, gang activity or gang affiliate. The county police database system (i520) uses such codes and certain people are 'flagged' with a flashing red asterisk next to their names to let officers know that there may be a higher officer safety (OFS) risk associated with those individuals. The point of this communication was that there's a discrepancy if one group is flagged and another like group is not. If one should be, then they all should be.

    Direitos autorais:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
    Sinalizar o conteúdo como inadequado
    de 1

    1

    Paul R. Murphy
    From: Kevin Mede <kmede@co.whatcom.wa.us>
    Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 3:29 PM
    To: Paul Murphy
    Subject: Re: i520 426 flags
    You have a valid point. I don't know the most efficient answer, but I will try and find out. The only "official" method I'm
    familiar with is the old OFS requests for entry, but those are limited in scope and I don't know if anyone uses those
    anymore anyway.
    I will get back to you soon with what I find out.
    Kevin
    >>> Paul Murphy 8/5/2011 3:19 PM >>>
    Kevin,
    As you're probably aware, I've been researching and accumulating data on known 1%'er OMG members and affiliates
    associated with our area. In my research, I've noticed that a number of Hells Angels (red & white) and their support
    clubs have been contacted in our area, some of them very frequently, but none of them are flagged as such in the i520
    system. The red & gold club members are pretty well identified, but not many (if any) of the red & white club members.
    ex: Van Weerdhuizen, Travis Ian 10-16-69 is a confirmed full patch HA member with the Hells Angels Tacoma Chapter,
    formerly of the Spokane Chapter, who used to live and work in Lynden and has family ties there still. Most recent ICE
    contact in Everson, in 2010.
    I'd like to furnish a list of known members and affiliates to records, along with updates as new members are identified,
    to be flagged as "GNG", for officer safety purposes, so that ours have an idea of what they are dealing with when these
    folks are contacted in the field and so they can be FIR'ed.
    How should this request be routed?
    Murphy
    Sergeant Kevin Mede
    Whatcom County Sheriff's Office
    Patrol/Special Response Team
    676-6707 x 33134
    "Remember the difference between a boss and a leader; a boss says 'Go!' - a leader says 'Let's go!'
    -E. M. Kelly

    Você também pode gostar