Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
________________________________________ Churchill Student is completely prepared and appears rehearsed. Presentation seems well thought out. Stalin Student seems pretty prepared and half rehearsed. Seems to be some sort of a plan of action. Mussolinni The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that there was no rehearsel or plan of action. Facial expressions and body language are used to try to generate enthusiasm, but seem somewhat faked. Student is able to accurately answer a few questions posed by the Editor of the New York Times. Hitler Student does not seem at all prepared to present.
Enthusiasm 20%
Facial expressions and body language generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others. Student is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by the Editor of the New York Times. Speaks clearly and distinctly all (10095%) the time.
Facial expressions and body language sometimes generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others. Student is able to accurately answer most questions posed by the Editor of the New York Times.
Very little use of facial expressions or body language. Did not generate much interest in topic being presented. Student is unable to accurately answer questions posed by the Editor of the New York Times. Often mumbles or can not be understood.
Speaks clearly and Speaks clearly and distinctly all (94-85%) distinctly most ( 84the time. 75%) of the time.
Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation. Fills out peer evaluation completely and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation.
Fills out almost all of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
Fills out most of the peer evaluation and always gives scores based on the presentation rather than other factors (e.g., person is a close friend).
Fills out most of the peer evaluation but scoring appears to be biased.