(a) Methods for SOC quantification A protocol for modeling, measurement and monitoring soil carbon stocks in agricultural landscapes. A widely used approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Mid to high cost requiring a degree of technical expertise, but primariy low-tech equipment Landscape-level and farm/paddock- level if remote sensing is available Aynekulu et al (2011) VCS Module VMD0021; Estimation of Stocks in the soil carbon pool A less-common approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty High cost requiring a degree of technical expertise and relatively high-tech equipment Landscape- and farm/paddock-level
Sampling, measurement and analytical protocols for carbon estimation in soil, litter and coarse woody debris. A widely used approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Mid-range cost requiring some technical expertise and relatively no high-tech equipment. Landscape- and farm/paddock-level McKenzie et al. (2000) Soil testing protocols at the paddock scale for contracts and audits Market-based instrument for soil carbon. A less-common approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Low to mid-range cost requiring some technical expertise and relatively no high- tech equipment. Specificall designed for paddock (extensive rangeland) Murphy et al. (2013) (b) Methods for considering SOC as part of the whole ecosystem carbon quantification Measuring Carbon Stocks Across Land Use Systems A widely used approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Spans a range of costs, technical expertise and equipment Landscape- and farm/paddock-level Hairiah et al. (2010) Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects A widely used approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Low to mid-range cost requiring some technical expertise and relatively no high- tech equipment. Landscape-level McDicken, 1997 GOFC-GOLD (2009) A less-common approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Mid to high cost requiring a degree of technical expertise, and mid to high-tech equipment Landscape-level GOFC-GOLD (2009) Forest Carbon Stock Measurement: Guidelines for Measuring Carbon Stocks in Community-Managed Forests A less-common approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Mid-range cost requiring some technical expertise and relatively no high-tech equipment. Landscape-level Subedi et al, 2010 Small-Holder Agriculture Monitoring and Baseline Assessment (SHAMBA) methodology. A less-common approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Low to mid-range cost requiring some technical expertise and relatively no high- tech equipment. Not designed for sites with signs of significant erosion Berry et al. 2012 Integrating Carbon Benefits into GEF Projects. A widely used approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty Mid to high cost requiring a degree of technical expertise, and mid to high-tech equipment Landscape- and farm/paddock-level Pearson et al. 2005 Carbon Inventory Methods A less-common approach that gives an estimate of uncertainty A range of costs requiring a degree of technical expertise and mid to high--tech equipment Landscape-level Ravindranath and Ostwald 2008