CRIMINAL LAW I ‘Course Syilabus Justice Maria V. Loper. GENERAL PRINCIPLES, 1. Concept of Criminal Law 2, Definition , Purpose + ‘Theories - Magno vs. CA, G.R, No. 96132 June 26, 1992 ¢, Enactment of penal statues (constitutional limitations) + Estrada vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No, 148560, November 19, 2001 + Peopte vs. Dacuycuy. G.R. No. L-45127 May 5, 1989 2. Characteristics of Criminal Law a. Diplomatic Immunity + Minucher v. Scalzo, G.R. No, 142396 Feb. $1, 2003 + Liang v. People, GR 125865 March 26, 2011 b. Rewoactivity > People v. Lacson. GR 149453, April 1, 2003 = Gow. Dimagiba, GR 151876 June 24, 2005 . Territoriatity PD 1599, UNCLOS Ar. 2, RPC US vs, Bull, 15 Phil. 7 People vs. Wong Cheng, 46 Phil, 729 Peaple vs. Look Chow. £8 Phil, $73 People vs. Lol-lo and Saraw, 43 Phil. 19 An.3, Definition of Felony 2. Dolo v, Culpa People vs, Ak Chong, 15 Phil. 257 Peopic vs. Oanis, 74 Phil. 257 People vs. Pugsy, GR L-74324 Nov. 17, 1988 People v3, Garcia, GR 153591 Februmry 25, 2004 Garcia vs. CA, GR.157171 March 14, 2006 ‘Manuel v3. People, GR 165842 November 29, 2005 People v. Delim, GR 142773, January 28, 2003 Meer v, San Pedro, G.R. No. 172716, Novomber 17, 2010 b, Mala in se vs. Mala Prohibita + People v. Bayon, 61 Phil. 181 US vs. Chico, 14 Phil. 128 Ant, 4, Criminal Liability People vs, Migan, 191. SCRA 643 People vs, Mananguil, 132 SCRA 198 ‘Quinto vs. Andrés, ct. al. GR 155791 March 16, 2005, 458 SCRA S11 People vs. Quianzon, 62 Phil. 162 Urbano v. IAC, GR 72964, Sanuiry.7, 1988Impossible Crimes, Intod . Court of Appeats, 215 SCRA 52 People v, Domasian, 219 SCRA 245 Jacinto v. People. G.R. No, 162540, fuly 13, 2009 Am. 6. Stages of a felony Avempted/Frustrated/Convammated, overt acts, acts of execution a, Subjective and Objective phase of a felony + US. v, Eduave, 36 Phil, 208 'b Rape * People v, Orita, 184 SCRA 05 + People ¥, Camputon, 329 SCRA 270 heft + Valenzuela ¥, People, $25 SCRA 106 4d. Robbery * People v, Lamahang. 62 Phil. 73 * People v, Salvillam, 1M4 SCRA 675 ¢. Marder * Epifanie ¥, People, GR 197052, Jone 29, 20077 * People v, Sy Blo, 24 Phil. BRS * People «, Ravelo, 202 SCRA 68S £. Homicide + People v. Kalaiom, $9 Phil. 715 g.Fsiafa + US 1. Britery + Povar v. CA, GR L-62439. Qewher 23. 18 i Arson + People v. Hemandez, $4 Phil. 122 + US v, Valder, 30 Phil, 286 6 Domingue? 1 Phil. 405 aricle 10 Ladonga vs. People, GR 141066, February 17, 2005 People vs. Simon, 234 SCRA S55 Ant 11, Justifying cireutnstances 1. Self Defense 3, Unlawful Aggression + People vs. Manchan, GR 13072 + Pople vs. Alconga, 78 Pail, 366 + People vs, Genosa, 419 SCRA S37 + People vs. Nugas. G.R, No, 172606, November 23, 2017 b, Test of Real and Imminent Perit + Senoje vs. People. GR. 160341, October 19, 2004 c. Reasonable Necessiiy = People vs, Razon, GR 158053 June 21, 2007 + Esichan ¥. Peopte, 127 SCRA 784 + People v. Luague, 62 Phil, 504 * People v. Dela Cruz, 61 Phil, 344 + People y. Jaurigue,76 Phil. 174 4. Sutficient Provocation + People v. Oriente, GR 155094, January 30, 2007 July 11, 2006 Page 2 of 7. Defense of Property + People v. Apolinar, 38 OG 2870 + US v. Bumanglag, 14 Phil. 644 + People v. Narvaez, 121 SCRA 339 £. Self-defense in libel + People vs. Chua Hong (CA), 51 OG 1932 + People vs. Pelayo, 64 OG 1991 . State of Necessit , atin ¥. Standard Vacuum Oil Co, 91 Pil. 672 3. Fulfillment of Duty and Exercise of Right a. People v. Oanis, 74 Phil. 257 b. Civil Code Art, 429 4, Lawful Order a. People v, Beronilla, 96 Phil. 566 », People v. Barroga, 54 Phil, 247 Art. 12, Exempting Circumstances 1, Insanity/Imbecility a. People v. Ambal, 100 SCRA 325 b, People v. Puno, 105 SCRA 151 2. Minority a, RA 9344 b People v. Estepano, 307 SCRA 701 . Llave vs. People, G.R. No. 166040, April 26, 2006 4. Jarco vs, CA, 321 SCRA 375 ©. Guevarra v. Almodovar, 169 SCRA 476 f. People v. Sarcia, GR 169641, September 10, 2009 g People v. Mantalaba, GR 186227, July 20, 2011 3. Ircesistible force/ancontrollable fear a US v. Caballeros, 4 Phil. 350 , US v. Exaltacion, 3 Phil. 339 4. Accident a. Pomoy v. People, 439 SCRA 439 5. Absolutory Causes, Ants. 6, 20, 247, 332 a, People v. Doria, 301 SCRA 668 Art, 13 Mitigating Circumstances 1, Nature/Kinds 2. Lack of intention to commit so grave a wrong, 1. People v. Ural, 56 SCRA 138 b, People v. Callet, GR 135701 May 9, 2002 3. Sufficient Provocation a, People v. Leonor, 305 SCRA 285, b. People v. Espina, GR 132325 July 16, 2002 4. Immediate vindication of a grave offense a. People v. Diokno, 63 Phil. 601 b. US v. Ampar, 37 Phil. 201 ¢. People v. Pajares, 210 SCRA 237 5. Passion or Obfuscation a. People vs. Adiawan, GR 131839, January 30, 2002 b. US v. Hicks, 14 Phil. 217 ©. US y. Dela Cruz, 22 Phil. 429 Keen Page 3 of 7