Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S1—S2
Preface
This supplement of Resuscitation contains the Euro-
pean Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005. It is derived from the 2005
International Consensus Conference on Cardiopul-
monary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascu-
lar Care Science with Treatment Recommendations
produced by the International Liaison Committee
on Resuscitation (ILCOR) published simultaneously
in an issue of Resuscitation.
The European representatives at that Confer-
ence, held in Dallas in January 2005, more than
pulled their weight in the process of producing the
Consensus on Science conclusions arising as a result
of presentations and debate. Their names are listed
at the end of this Foreword, and the resuscitation
community in Europe and beyond is most grateful
to them for their talent, dedication and selfless
hard work. In addition, they, and many others from
Europe, also produced worksheets addressing the
evidence for and against every conceivable detail
of resuscitation theory and practice.
The ERC Guidelines contain recommendations
that, by consensus of the European representatives,
are suitable for European practice in the light of
today’s conclusions agreed in the Consensus on Sci-
ence. As with the Consensus on Science document,
they represent an enormous amount of work by
many people who have worked against the clock
to produce the Guidelines for Europe. Each section
of the Guidelines has been masterminded and coor-
dinated by the leaders of the ERC working groups
and areas of special interest.
Such ventures do not happen without leader-
ship, and we are grateful to Vinay Nadkarni, Bill
Montgomery, Peter Morley, Mary Fran Hazinski, Arno
Zaritsky, and Jerry Nolan for guiding the Consensus
on Science process through to completion. It would
not be invidious to single out Jerry Nolan, the ILCOR
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.001
co-chairman, for thanks and praise. He is univer-
sally respected and popular, and has proved to be
a wonderful ambassador for Europe. His scientific
credibility and understanding are beyond doubt and
his integrity, dedication, sheer hard work, patience
and meticulous attention to detail and sensitivities
have won the admiration of all. He has led the Con-
sensus on Science process on our behalf, and has
been the lead co-ordinator in producing the Euro-
pean Guidelines.
Finally we thank our publishers, Elsevier, through
the Publishing Editor for Resuscitation, Anne Lloyd
and her colleagues, for their professionalism, tol-
erance and patience in these endeavours.
Representatives from Europe at the
International Consensus Conference
held in Dallas, USA, in January 2005
Hans-Richard Arntz (Germany), Dennis Azzopardi
(UK), Jan Bahr (Germany), Gad Bar-Joseph (Israel),
Peter Baskett (UK), Michael Baubin (Austria),
Dominique Biarent (Belgium), Bob Bingham (UK),
Bernd Böttiger (Germany), Leo Bossaert (Belgium),
Steven Byrne (UK), Pierre Carli (France), Pascal
Cassan (France), Sian Davies (UK), Charles Deakin
(UK), Burkhard Dirks (Germany), Volker Doerges
(Germany), Hans Domanovits (Austria), Christoph
Eich (Germany), Lars Ekstrom (Sweden), Peter
Fenici (Italy), F. Javier Garcia-Vega (Spain), Hen-
rik Gervais (Germany) Anthony Handley (UK), Johan
Herlitz (Sweden), Fulvio Kette (Italy), Rudolph
Koster (Netherlands), Kristian Lexow (Norway),
Perttu Lindsberg (Finland), Freddy Lippert (Den-
mark), Vit Marecek (Czech Republic), Koenraad
Monsieurs (Belgium), Jerry Nolan (UK), Narcisco
S2 Preface

Perales (Spain), Gavin Perkins (UK), Sam Rich-
mond (UK), Antonio Rodriquez Nunez (Spain), Sten
Rubertsson (Sweden), Sebastian Russo (Germany),
Jas Soar (UK), Eldar Soreide (Norway), Petter Steen
(Norway), Benjamin Stenson (UK), Kjetil Sunde
(Norway), Caroline Telion (France), Andreas Thier-
bach (Germany), Christian Torp Pederson (Den-
mark), Volker Wenzel (Austria), Lars Wik (Norway),
Benno Wolke (Germany), Jonathan Wyllie (UK),
David Zideman (UK).
Peter Baskett
David Zideman
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S7—S23
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of
automated external defibrillators
Anthony J. Handley, Rudolph Koster, Koen Monsieurs, Gavin D. Perkins,
Sian Davies, Leo Bossaert
Basic life support (BLS) refers to maintaining airway
patency and supporting breathing and the circula-
tion, without the use of equipment other than a
protective device.1 This section contains the guide-
lines for adult BLS by lay rescuers and for the use
of an automated external defibrillator (AED). It
also includes recognition of sudden cardiac arrest,
the recovery position and management of choking
(foreign-body airway obstruction). Guidelines for
in-hospital BLS and the use of manual defibrillators
may be found in Sections 3 and 4b.
Introduction
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a leading cause of
death in Europe, affecting about 700,000 individ-
uals a year.2 At the time of the first heart rhythm
analysis, about 40% of SCA victims have ventricular
fibrillation (VF).3—6 It is likely that many more vic-
tims have VF or rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT)
at the time of collapse but, by the time the first
ECG is recorded, their rhythm has deteriorated to
asystole.7,8 VF is characterized by chaotic, rapid
depolarisation and repolarisation. The heart loses
its coordinated function and stops pumping blood
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.007
effectively.9 Many victims of SCA can survive if
bystanders act immediately while VF is still present,
but successful resuscitation is unlikely once the
rhythm has deteriorated to asystole.10 The opti-
mum treatment for VF cardiac arrest is immediate
bystander CPR (combined chest compression and
rescue breathing) plus electrical defibrillation. The
predominant mechanism of cardiac arrest in victims
of trauma, drug overdose, drowning, and in many
children is asphyxia; rescue breaths are critical for
resuscitation of these victims.
The following concept of the Chain of Survival
summarises the vital steps needed for success-
ful resuscitation (Figure 1.1). Most of these links
are relevant for victims of both VF and asphyxial
arrest.11
1. Early recognition of the emergency and call-
ing for help: activate the emergency medical
services (EMS) or local emergency response sys-
tem, e.g. ‘‘phone 112’’.12,13 An early, effective
response may prevent cardiac arrest.
2. Early bystander CPR: immediate CPR can double
or triple survival from VF SCA.10,14—17
3. Early defibrillation: CPR plus defibrillation
within 3—5 min of collapse can produce survival
rates as high as 49—75%.18—25 Each minute of
S8 A.J. Handley et al.

delay in defibrillation reduces the probability of

survival to discharge by 10—15%.14,17
4. Early advanced life support and post-
resuscitation care: the quality of treatment
during the post-resuscitation phase affects
outcome.26

In most communities, the time from EMS call to

EMS arrival (response interval) is 8 min or longer.27
During this time the victim’s survival is dependent
on early initiation by bystanders of the first three
of the links of the Chain of Survival.
Victims of cardiac arrest need immediate CPR.
This provides a small but critical blood flow to the
heart and brain. It also increases the likelihood
that a defibrillatory shock will terminate VF and
enable the heart to resume an effective rhythm and
effective systemic perfusion. Chest compression is
especially important if a shock cannot be delivered
sooner than 4 or 5 min after collapse.28,29 Defibril-
lation interrupts the uncoordinated depolarisation-
repolarisation process that occurs during VF. If
the heart is still viable, its normal pacemakers
then resume their function and produce an effec-
tive rhythm and resumption of circulation. In the
first few minutes after successful defibrillation, the Figure 2.1 Adult basic life support algorithm.
rhythm may be slow and ineffective; chest com-
pressions may be needed until adequate cardiac • gently shake his shoulders and ask loudly:
function returns.30 ‘‘Are you all right?’’
Lay rescuers can be trained to use an automated 3a If he responds
external defibrillator (AED) to analyse the victim’s • leave him in the position in which you find him
cardiac rhythm and deliver a shock if VF is present. provided there is no further danger
An AED uses voice prompts to guide the rescuer. It • try to find out what is wrong with him and get
analyses the ECG rhythm and informs the rescuer help if needed
if a shock is needed. AEDs are extremely accurate • reassess him regularly
and will deliver a shock only when VF (or its precur-
sor, rapid ventricular tachycardia) is present.31 AED
function and operation are discussed in Section 3.
Several studies have shown the benefit on sur-
vival of immediate CPR, and the detrimental effect
of delay before defibrillation. For every minute
without CPR, survival from witnessed VF decreases
by 7—10%.10 When bystander CPR is provided, the
decline in survival is more gradual and averages
3—4% min−1 .10,14,17 Overall, bystander CPR dou-
bles or triples survival from witnessed cardiac
arrest.10,14,32

Adult BLS sequence

BLS consists of the following sequence of actions

(Figure 2.1).

1 Make sure you, the victim and any bystanders

are safe. Figure 2.2 Check the victim for a response. © 2005
2 Check the victim for a response (Figure 2.2). European Resuscitation Council.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 2.3 Shout for help. © 2005 European Resuscita-
tion Council.
3b If he does not respond
• shout for help (Figure 2.3)
• turn the victim onto his back and then
open the airway using head tilt and chin lift
(Figure 2.4)
◦ place your hand on his forehead and gently
tilt his head back keeping your thumb and
Figure 2.4 Head tilt and chin lift. © 2005 European
Resuscitation Council.
S9
Figure 2.5 Head tilt and chin lift in detail. © 2005 Euro-
pean Resuscitation Council.
index finger free to close his nose if rescue
breathing is required (Figure 2.5)
◦ with your fingertips under the point of the
victim’s chin, lift the chin to open the air-
way
4 Keeping the airway open, look, listen and feel
for normal breathing (Figure 2.6).
• Look for chest movement.
• Listen at the victim’s mouth for breath
sounds.
• Feel for air on your cheek.
In the first few minutes after cardiac arrest, a
victim may be barely breathing, or taking infre-
quent, noisy gasps. Do not confuse this with
normal breathing. Look, listen, and feel for no
Figure 2.6 Look listen and feel for normal breathing.
© 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
S10
Figure 2.7 The recovery position. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
more than 10 s to determine whether the vic-
tim is breathing normally. If you have any doubt
whether breathing is normal, act as if it is not
normal.
5a If he is breathing normally
• turn him into the recovery position (see
below) (Figure 2.7)
• send or go for help/call for an ambulance
• check for continued breathing
5b If he is not breathing normally
• send someone for help or, if you are on your
own, leave the victim and alert the ambu-
lance service; return and start chest compres-
sion as follows:
◦ kneel by the side of the victim
◦ place the heel of one hand in the centre of
the victim’s chest (Figure 2.8)
◦ place the heel of your other hand on top of
the first hand (Figure 2.9)
◦ interlock the fingers of your hands and
ensure that pressure is not applied over the
victim’s ribs (Figure 2.10). Do not apply any
pressure over the upper abdomen or the
bottom end of the bony sternum (breast-
bone)
◦ position yourself vertically above the vic-
tim’s chest and, with your arms straight,
Figure 2.8 Place the heel of one hand in the centre of
the victim’s chest. © 2005 European Resuscitation Coun-
cil.
A.J. Handley et al.
press down on the sternum 4—5 cm
(Figure 2.11)
◦ after each compression, release all the
pressure on the chest without losing con-
tact between your hands and the sternum;
repeat at a rate of about 100 min−1 (a little
less than 2 compressions s−1 )
◦ compression and release should take equal
amounts of time
6a Combine chest compression with rescue
breaths.
• After 30 compressions open the airway again
using head tilt and chin lift (Figure 2.12).
• Pinch the soft part of the nose closed, using
the index finger and thumb of your hand on
the forehead.
• Allow the mouth to open, but maintain chin
lift.
• Take a normal breath and place your lips
around his the mouth, making sure that you
have a good seal.
• Blow steadily into the mouth while watch-
ing for the chest to rise (Figure 2.13), taking
about 1 s as in normal breathing; this is an
effective rescue breath.
• Maintaining head tilt and chin lift, take your
mouth away from the victim and watch for the
chest to fall as air passes out (Figure 2.14).
Figure 2.9 Place the heel of your other hand on top of
the first hand. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S11

Figure 2.10 Interlock the fingers of your hands. © 2005 Figure 2.11 Press down on the sternum 4—5 cm. © 2005
European Resuscitation Council. European Resuscitation Council.

• Take another normal breath and blow into the

victim’s mouth once more, to achieve a total
of two effective rescue breaths. Then return
your hands without delay to the correct posi-
tion on the sternum and give a further 30
chest compressions.
• Continue with chest compressions and rescue
breaths in a ratio of 30:2.
• Stop to recheck the victim only if he starts
breathing normally; otherwise do not inter-
rupt resuscitation.
If your initial rescue breath does not make the
chest rise as in normal breathing, then before
your next attempt:
• check the victim’s mouth and remove any
obstruction
• recheck that there is adequate head tilt and Figure 2.12 After 30 compressions open the airway
chin lift again using head tilt and chin lift. © 2005 European Resus-
• do not attempt more than two breaths each citation Council.
time before returning to chest compressions
If there is more than one rescuer present, 6b Chest-compression-only CPR may be used as fol-
another should take over CPR every 1—2 min to lows.
prevent fatigue. Ensure the minimum of delay • If you are not able or are unwilling to give
during the changeover of rescuers. rescue breaths, give chest compressions only.
S12
Figure 2.13 Blow steadily into his mouth whilst watch-
ing for his chest to rise. © 2005 European Resuscitation
Council.
• If chest compressions only are given, these
should be continuous, at a rate of 100 min−1 .
• Stop to recheck the victim only if he starts
breathing normally; otherwise do not inter-
rupt resuscitation.
7 Continue resuscitation until
• qualified help arrives and takes over
• the victim starts breathing normally
• you become exhausted
Risk to the rescuer
The safety of both rescuer and victim are
paramount during a resuscitation attempt. There
have been few incidents of rescuers suffering
Figure 2.14 Take your mouth away from the victim and
watch for his chest to fall as air comes out. © 2005 Euro-
pean Resuscitation Council.
A.J. Handley et al.
adverse effects from undertaking CPR, with only
isolated reports of infections such as tuberculosis
(TB)33 and severe acute respiratory distress syn-
drome (SARS).34 Transmission of HIV during CPR
has never been reported. There have been no
human studies to address the effectiveness of bar-
rier devices during CPR; however, laboratory stud-
ies have shown that certain filters, or barrier
devices with one-way valves, prevent oral bacterial
transmission from the victim to the rescuer during
mouth-to-mouth ventilation.35,36 Rescuers should
take appropriate safety precautions where feasi-
ble, especially if the victim is known to have a
serious infection, such as TB or SARS. During an
outbreak of a highly infectious condition such as
SARS, full protective precautions for the rescuer are
essential.
Opening the airway
The jaw thrust is not recommended for lay res-
cuers because it is difficult to learn and perform
and may itself cause spinal movement.37 Therefore,
the lay rescuer should open the airway using a head
tilt-chin lift manoeuvre for both injured and non-
injured victims.
Recognition of cardiorespiratory arrest
Checking the carotid pulse is an inaccurate
method of confirming the presence or absence
of circulation.38 However, there is no evidence
that checking for movement, breathing or cough-
ing (‘signs of a circulation’) is diagnostically supe-
rior. Healthcare professionals as well as lay rescuers
have difficulty determining the presence or absence
of adequate or normal breathing in unresponsive
victims.39,40 This may be because the airway is
not open41 or because the victim is making occa-
sional (agonal) gasps. When bystanders are asked
by ambulance dispatchers over the telephone if
breathing is present, they often misinterpret agonal
gasps as normal breathing. This erroneous informa-
tion can result in the bystander withholding CPR
from a cardiac arrest victim.42 Agonal gasps are
present in up to 40% of cardiac arrest victims.
Bystanders describe agonal gasps as barely breath-
ing, heavy or laboured breathing, or noisy or gasp-
ing breathing.43
Laypeople should, therefore, be taught to begin
CPR if the victim is unconscious (unresponsive) and
not breathing normally. It should be emphasised
during training that agonal gasps occur commonly
in the first few minutes after SCA. They are an indi-
cation for starting CPR immediately and should not
be confused with normal breathing.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Initial rescue breaths
During the first few min after non-asphyxial cardiac
arrest the blood oxygen content remains high, and
myocardial and cerebral oxygen delivery is limited
more by the diminished cardiac output than a lack
of oxygen in the lungs. Ventilation is, therefore,
initially less important than chest compression.44
It is well recognised that skill acquisition and
retention is aided by simplification of the BLS
sequence of actions.45 It is also recognized that
rescuers are frequently unwilling to carry out
mouth-to-mouth ventilation for a variety of rea-
sons, including fear of infection and distaste for the
procedure.46—48 For these reasons, and to empha-
sise the priority of chest compressions, it is recom-
mended that in adults CPR should start with chest
compression rather than initial ventilation.
Ventilation
During CPR the purpose of ventilation is to maintain
adequate oxygenation. The optimal tidal volume,
respiratory rate and inspired oxygen concentration
to achieve this, however, are not fully known. The
current recommendations are based on the follow-
ing evidence:
1. During CPR, blood flow to the lungs is sub-
stantially reduced, so an adequate ventilation-
perfusion ratio can be maintained with lower
tidal volumes and respiratory rates than
normal.49
2. Not only is hyperventilation (too many breaths
or too large a volume) unnecessary, but it is
harmful because it increases intrathoracic pres-
sure, thus decreasing venous return to the heart
and diminishing cardiac output. Survival is con-
sequently reduced.50
3. When the airway is unprotected, a tidal volume
of 1 l produces significantly more gastric disten-
tion than a tidal volume of 500 ml.51
4. Low minute-ventilation (lower than normal tidal
volume and respiratory rate) can maintain
effective oxygenation and ventilation during
CPR.52—55 During adult CPR, tidal volumes of
approximately 500—600 ml (6—7 ml kg−1 ) should
be adequate.
5. Interruptions in chest compression (for exam-
ple to give rescue breaths) have a detrimental
effect on survival.56 Giving rescue breaths over
a shorter time will help to reduce the duration
of essential interruptions.
The current recommendation is, therefore, for
rescuers to give each rescue breath over about 1 s,
with enough volume to make the victim’s chest
S13
rise, but to avoid rapid or forceful breaths This
recommendation applies to all forms of ventilation
during CPR, including mouth-to-mouth and bag-
valve-mask (BVM) with and without supplementary
oxygen.
Mouth-to-nose ventilation is an effective alter-
native to mouth-to-mouth ventilation.57 It may be
considered if the victim’s mouth is seriously injured
or cannot be opened, the rescuer is assisting a vic-
tim in the water, or a mouth-to-mouth seal is diffi-
cult to achieve.
There is no published evidence on the
safety, effectiveness or feasibility of mouth-
to-tracheostomy ventilation, but it may be used
for a victim with a tracheostomy tube or tracheal
stoma who requires rescue breathing.
To use bag-mask ventilation requires consider-
able practice and skill.58,59 The lone rescuer has
to be able to open the airway with a jaw thrust
while simultaneously holding the mask to the vic-
tim’s face. It is a technique that is appropriate
only for lay rescuers who work in highly specialised
areas, such as where there is a risk of cyanide poi-
soning or exposure to other toxic agents. There
are other specific circumstances in which non-
healthcare providers receive extended training in
first aid which could include training, and retrain-
ing, in the use of bag-mask ventilation. The same
strict training that applies to healthcare profession-
als should be followed.
Chest compression
Chest compressions produce blood flow by increas-
ing the intrathoracic pressure and by directly com-
pressing the heart. Although chest compressions
performed properly can produce systolic arterial
pressure peaks of 60—80 mmHg, diastolic pressure
remains low and mean arterial pressure in the
carotid artery seldom exceeds 40 mmHg.60 Chest
compressions generate a small but critical amount
of blood flow to the brain and myocardium and
increase the likelihood that defibrillation will be
successful. They are especially important if the first
shock is delivered more than 5 min after collapse.61
Much of the information about the physiology of
chest compression and the effects of varying the
compression rate, compression-to-ventilation ratio
and duty cycle (ratio of time chest is compressed
to total time from one compression to the next) is
derived from animal models. However, the conclu-
sions of the 2005 Consensus Conference62 included
the following:
(1) Each time compressions are resumed, the res-
cuer should place his hands without delay ‘‘in
the centre of the chest’’.63
S14
(2) Compress the chest at a rate of about
100 min−1 .64—66
(3) Pay attention to achieving the full compression
depth of 4—5 cm (for an adult).67,68
(4) Allow the chest to recoil completely after each
compression.69,70
(5) Take approximately the same amount of time
for compression and relaxation.
(6) Minimise interruptions in chest compression.
(7) Do not rely on a palpable carotid or femoral
pulse as a gauge of effective arterial flow.38,71
There is insufficient evidence to support a spe-
cific hand position for chest compression during CPR
in adults. Previous guidelines have recommended a
method of finding the middle of the lower half of
the sternum by placing one finger on the lower end
of the sternum and sliding the other hand down to
it.72 It has been shown that for healthcare profes-
sionals the same hand position can be found more
quickly if rescuers are taught to ‘‘place the heel
of your hand in the centre of the chest with the
other hand on top’’, provided the teaching includes
a demonstration of placing the hands in the middle
of the lower half of the sternum.63 It is reasonable
to extend this to laypeople.
Compression rate refers to the speed at which
compressions are given, not the total number deliv-
ered in each minute. The number delivered is
determined by the rate, but also by the number
of interruptions to open the airway, deliver res-
cue breaths and allow AED analysis. In one out-
of-hospital study rescuers recorded compression
rates of 100—120 min−1 but, the mean number of
compressions was reduced to 64 min−1 by frequent
interruptions.68
Compression—ventilation ratio
Insufficient evidence from human outcome studies
exists to support any given compression:ventilation
ratio. Animal data support an increase in the ratio
above 15:2.73—75 A mathematical model suggests
that a ratio of 30:2 would provide the best compro-
mise between blood flow and oxygen delivery.76,77
A ratio of 30 compressions to two ventilations is
recommended for the single rescuer attempting
resuscitation on an adult or child out of hospi-
tal. This should decrease the number of inter-
ruptions in compression, reduce the likelihood
of hyperventilation,50,78 simplify instruction for
teaching and improve skill retention.
Compression-only CPR
Healthcare professionals as well as lay rescuers
admit to being reluctant to perform mouth-to-
A.J. Handley et al.
mouth ventilation in unknown victims of cardiac
arrest.46,48 Animal studies have shown that chest
compression-only CPR may be as effective as com-
bined ventilation and compression in the first few
minutes after non-asphyxial arrest.44,79 In adults,
the outcome of chest compression without venti-
lation is significantly better than the outcome of
giving no CPR.80 If the airway is open, occasional
gasps and passive chest recoil may provide some air
exchange.81,82 A low minute-ventilation may be all
that is necessary to maintain a normal ventilation-
perfusion ratio during CPR.
Laypeople should, therefore, be encouraged to
perform compression-only CPR if they are unable
or unwilling to provide rescue breaths, although
combined chest compression and ventilation is the
better method of CPR.
CPR in confined spaces
Over-the-head CPR for single rescuers and straddle
CPR for two rescuers may be considered for resus-
citation in confined spaces.83,84
Recovery position
There are several variations of the recovery posi-
tion, each with its own advantages. No single posi-
tion is perfect for all victims.85,86 The position
should be stable, near a true lateral position with
the head dependent, and with no pressure on the
chest to impair breathing.87
The ERC recommends the following sequence
of actions to place a victim in the recovery
position:
• Remove the victim’s spectacles.
• Kneel beside the victim and make sure that both
legs are straight.
• Place the arm nearest to you out at right angles to
the body, elbow bent with the hand palm upper-
most (Figure 2.15).
• Bring the far arm across the chest, and hold the
back of the hand against the victim’s cheek near-
est to you (Figure 2.16).
• With your other hand, grasp the far leg just above
the knee and pull it up, keeping the foot on the
ground (Figure 2.17).
• Keeping his hand pressed against his cheek, pull
on the far leg to roll the victim towards you onto
his side.
• Adjust the upper leg so that both hip and knee
are bent at right angles.
• Tilt the head back to make sure the airway
remains open.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 2.15 Place the arm nearest to you out at right
angles to his body, elbow bent with the hand palm upper-
most. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
Figure 2.16 Bring the far arm across the chest, and hold
the back of the hand against the victim’s cheek nearest
to you. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
Figure 2.17 With your other hand, grasp the far leg just
above the knee and pull it up, keeping the foot on the
ground. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
S15
Figure 2.18 The recovery position. © 2005 European
Resuscitation Council.
• Adjust the hand under the cheek, if necessary, to
keep the head tilted (Figure 2.18).
• Check breathing regularly.
If the victim has to be kept in the recovery posi-
tion for more than 30 min turn him to the opposite
side to relieve the pressure on the lower arm.
Foreign-body airway obstruction (choking)
Foreign-body airway obstruction (FBAO) is an
uncommon but potentially treatable cause of acci-
dental death.88 Each year approximately 16,000
adults and children in the UK receive treatment in
an emergency department for FBAO. Fortunately,
less than 1% of these incidents are fatal.89 The
commonest cause of choking in adults is airway
obstruction caused by food such as fish, meat or
poultry.89 In infants and children, half the reported
episodes of choking occur while eating (mostly con-
fectionery), and the remaining choking episodes
occur with non-food items such as coins or toys.90
Deaths from choking are rare in infants and chil-
dren; 24 deaths a year on average were reported
in the UK between 1986 and 1995, and over half of
these children were under 1 year.90
S16
Table 2.1 Differentiation between mild and severe foreign body airway obstruction (FBAO)a
Sign Mild obstruction
‘‘Are you choking?’’ ‘‘Yes’’
Other signs Can speak, cough, breathe
a General signs of FBAO: attack occurs while eating; victim may clutch at neck.
As most choking events are associated with eat-
ing, they are commonly witnessed. Thus, there is
often the opportunity for early intervention while
the victim is still responsive.
Recognition
Because recognition of airway obstruction is the key
to successful outcome, it is important not to con-
fuse this emergency with fainting, heart attack,
seizure or other conditions that may cause sud-
den respiratory distress, cyanosis or loss of con-
sciousness. Foreign bodies may cause either mild or
severe airway obstruction. The signs and symptoms
enabling differentiation between mild and severe
airway obstruction are summarised in Table 2.1. It
is important to ask the conscious victim ‘Are you
choking?’
Adult FBAO (choking) sequence
(This sequence is also suitable for use in children
over the age of 1 year) (Figure 2.19).
1 If the victim shows signs of mild airway obstruc-
tion
• Encourage him to continue coughing but do
nothing else
2 If the victim shows signs of severe airway obstruc-
tion and is conscious
Figure 2.19 Adult foreign body airway obstruction treatment algorithm.
A.J. Handley et al.
Severe obstruction
Unable to speak, may nod
Cannot breathe/wheezy breathing/silent
attempts to cough/unconsciousness
• Apply up to five back blows as follows.
◦ Stand to the side and slightly behind the vic-
tim.
◦ Support the chest with one hand and lean
the victim well forwards so that when the
obstructing object is dislodged it comes out
of the mouth rather than goes further down
the airway.
◦ Give up to five sharp blows between the
shoulder blades with the heel of your other
hand
• Check to see if each back blow has relieved the
airway obstruction. The aim is to relieve the
obstruction with each slap rather than neces-
sarily to give all five.
• If five back blows fail to relieve the airway
obstruction, give up to five abdominal thrusts
as follows:
◦ Stand behind the victim and put both arms
round the upper part of his abdomen.
◦ Lean the victim forwards.
◦ Clench your fist and place it between the
umbilicus and xiphisternum.
◦ Grasp this hand with your other hand and
pull sharply inwards and upwards.
◦ Repeat up to five times.
• If the obstruction is still not relieved, continue
alternating five back blows with five abdominal
thrusts.
3 If the victim at any time becomes unconscious.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
• Support the victim carefully to the ground.
• Immediately activate EMS.
• Begin CPR (from 5b of the adult BLS sequence).
Healthcare providers, trained and experienced
in feeling for a carotid pulse, should initiate
chest compressions, even if a pulse is present
in the unconscious choking victim.
FBAO causing mild airway obstruction
Coughing generates high and sustained airway pres-
sures and may expel the foreign body. Aggressive
treatment, with back blows, abdominal thrusts and
chest compression, may cause potentially serious
complications and could worsen the airway obstruc-
tion. It should be reserved for victims who have
signs of severe airway obstruction. Victims with
mild airway obstruction should remain under con-
tinuous observation until they improve, as severe
airway obstruction may develop.
FBAO with severe airway obstruction
The clinical data on choking are largely retrospec-
tive and anecdotal. For conscious adults and chil-
dren over 1 year with a complete FBAO, case reports
demonstrate the effectiveness of back blows or
‘slaps’, abdominal thrusts and chest thrusts.91
Approximately 50% of episodes of airway obstruc-
tion are not relieved by a single technique.92 The
likelihood of success is increased when combina-
tions of back blows or slaps, and abdominal and
chest thrusts are used.91
A randomised trial in cadavers93 and two
prospective studies in anaesthetised volunteers94,95
showed that higher airway pressures can be gener-
ated using chest thrusts compared with abdominal
thrusts. Since chest thrusts are virtually identical
to chest compressions, rescuers should be taught
to start CPR if a victim of known or suspected
FBAO becomes unconscious. During CPR, each time
the airway is opened the victim’s mouth should be
quickly checked for any foreign body that has been
partly expelled. The incidence of unsuspected
choking as a cause of unconsciousness or cardiac
arrest is low; therefore, during CPR routinely
checking the mouth for foreign bodies is not
necessary.
The finger sweep
No studies have evaluated the routine use of a finger
sweep to clear the airway in the absence of visible
airway obstruction,96—98 and four case reports have
S17
documented harm to the victim96,99 or rescuer.91
Therefore, avoid use of a blind finger sweep and
manually remove solid material in the airway only
if it can be seen.
Aftercare and referral for medical review
Following successful treatment for FBAO, foreign
material may nevertheless remain in the upper or
lower respiratory tract and cause complications
later. Victims with a persistent cough, difficulty
swallowing or the sensation of an object being still
stuck in the throat, should therefore be referred for
a medical opinion.
Abdominal thrusts can cause serious internal
injuries, and all victims treated with abdomi-
nal thrusts should be examined for injury by a
doctor.91
Resuscitation of children (see also
Section 6) and victims of drowning (see
also Section 7c)
Both ventilation and compression are important
for victims of cardiac arrest when the oxygen
stores become depleted—–about 4—6 min after col-
lapse from VF and immediately after collapse
from asphyxial arrest. Previous guidelines tried to
take into account the difference in pathophysiol-
ogy, and recommended that victims of identifiable
asphyxia (drowning; trauma; intoxication) and chil-
dren should receive 1 min of CPR before the lone
rescuer left the victim to get help. The majority
of cases of SCA out of hospital, however, occur in
adults, and are of cardiac origin due to VF. These
additional recommendations, therefore, added to
the complexity of the guidelines while affecting
only a minority of victims.
It is important to be aware that many children
do not receive resuscitation because potential res-
cuers fear causing harm. This fear is unfounded;
it is far better to use the adult BLS sequence for
resuscitation of a child than to do nothing. For
ease of teaching and retention, therefore, laypeo-
ple should be taught that the adult sequence may
also be used for children who are not responsive
and not breathing.
The following minor modifications to the adult
sequence will, however, make it even more suitable
for use in children.
• Give five initial rescue breaths before starting
chest compressions (adult sequence of actions,
5b).
S18
• A lone rescuer should perform CPR for approxi-
mately 1 min before going for help.
• Compress the chest by approximately one third
of its depth; use two fingers for an infant under
1 year; use one or two hands for a child over 1
year as needed to achieve an adequate depth of
compression.
The same modifications of five initial breaths, and
1 min of CPR by the lone rescuer before getting
help, may improve outcome for victims of drown-
ing. This modification should be taught only to
those who have a specific duty of care to poten-
tial drowning victims (e.g. lifeguards). Drowning is
easily identified. It can be difficult, on the other
hand, for a layperson to determine whether car-
diorespiratory arrest is a direct result of trauma
or intoxication. These victims should, therefore, be
managed according to the standard protocol.
Use of an automated external
defibrillator
Section 3 discusses the guidelines for defibrillation
using both automated external defibrillators (AEDs)
and manual defibrillators. However, there are some
special considerations when an AED is to be used by
lay or non-healthcare rescuers.
Standard AEDs are suitable for use in children
older than 8 years. For children between 1 and 8
years use paediatric pads or a paediatric mode if
available; if these are not available, use the AED as
it is. Use of AEDs is not recommended for children
less than 1 year.
Sequence for use of an AED
See Figure 2.20.
(1) Make sure you, the victim, and any bystanders
are safe.
(2) If the victim is unresponsive and not breathing
normally, send someone for the AED and to call
for an ambulance.
(3) Start CPR according to the guidelines for BLS.
(4) As soon as the defibrillator arrives
• switch on the defibrillator and attach the
electrode pads. If more than one rescuer is
present, CPR should be continued while this
is carried out
• follow the spoken/visual directions
• ensure that nobody touches the victim while
the AED is analysing the rhythm
5a If a shock is indicated
• ensure that nobody touches the victim
A.J. Handley et al.
• push shock button as directed (fully auto-
matic AEDs will deliver the shock automat-
ically)
• continue as directed by the voice/visual
prompts
5b If no shock indicated
• immediately resume CPR, using a ratio of 30
compressions to 2 rescue breaths
• continue as directed by the voice/visual
prompts
6 Continue to follow the AED prompts until
• qualified help arrives and takes over
• the victim starts to breathe normally
• you become exhausted
CPR before defibrillation
Immediate defibrillation, as soon as an AED
becomes available, has always been a key ele-
ment in guidelines and teaching, and considered of
paramount importance for survival from ventricu-
lar fibrillation. This concept has been challenged
because evidence suggests that a period of chest
compression before defibrillation may improve sur-
vival when the time between calling for the ambu-
lance and its arrival exceeds 5 min.28,61,100 One
study101 did not confirm this benefit, but the weight
of evidence supports a period of CPR for victims of
prolonged cardiac arrest before defibrillation.
In all of these studies CPR was performed by
paramedics, who protected the airway by intuba-
tion and delivered 100% oxygen. Such high-quality
ventilation cannot be expected from lay rescuers
giving mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Secondly, the
benefit from CPR occurred only when the delay from
call to the availability of a defibrillator was greater
than 5 min; the delay from collapse to arrival of the
rescuer with an AED will rarely be known with cer-
tainty. Thirdly, if good bystander CPR is already in
progress when the AED arrives, it does not seem
logical to continue it any further. For these reasons
these guidelines recommend an immediate shock,
as soon as the AED is available. The importance of
early uninterrupted external chest compression is
emphasised.
Voice prompts
In several places, the sequence of actions states
‘follow the voice/visual prompts’. The prompts are
usually programmable, and it is recommended that
they be set in accordance with the sequence of
shocks and timings for CPR given in Section 2. These
should include at least:
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 2.20 Algorithm for use of an automated external defibrillator.
(1) a single shock only, when a shockable rhythm is
detected
(2) no rhythm check, or check for breathing or a
pulse, after the shock
(3) a voice prompt for immediate resumption of
CPR after the shock (giving chest compressions
in the presence of a spontaneous circulation is
not harmful)
(4) two minutes for CPR before a prompt to assess
the rhythm, breathing or a pulse is given
The shock sequence and energy levels are dis-
cussed in Section 3.
Fully-automatic AEDs
Having detected a shockable rhythm, a fully-
automatic AED will deliver a shock without further
S19
input from the rescuer. One manikin study showed
that untrained nursing students committed fewer
safety errors using a fully-automatic AED rather
than a semi-automatic AED.102 There are no human
data to determine whether these findings can be
applied to clinical use.
Public access defibrillation programmes
Public access defibrillation (PAD) and first responder
AED programmes may increase the number of vic-
tims who receive bystander CPR and early defibril-
lation, thus improving survival from out-of-hospital
SCA.103 These programmes require an organised
and practised response with rescuers trained and
equipped to recognise emergencies, activate the
EMS system, provide CPR and use the AED.104,105 Lay
rescuer AED programmes with very rapid response
S20
times in airports,22 on aircraft23 or in casinos,25 and
uncontrolled studies using police officers as first
responders,106,107 have achieved reported survival
rates as high as 49—74%.
The logistic problem for first responder pro-
grammes is that the rescuer needs to arrive not
just earlier than the traditional EMS, but within
5—6 min of the initial call, to enable attempted
defibrillation in the electrical or circulatory phase
of cardiac arrest.108 With longer delays, the survival
curve flattens;10,17 a few minutes’ gain in time will
have little impact when the first responder arrives
more than 10 min after the call27,109 or when a first
responder does not improve on an already short
EMS response time.110 However, small reductions
in response intervals achieved by first-responder
programmes that have an impact on many residen-
tial victims may be more cost effective than the
larger reductions in response interval achieved by
PAD programmes that have an impact on fewer car-
diac arrest victims.111,112
Recommended elements for PAD programmes
include:
• a planned and practised response
• training of anticipated rescuers in CPR and use of
the AED
• link with the local EMS system
• programme of continuous audit (quality improve-
ment)
Public access defibrillation programmes are most
likely to improve survival from cardiac arrest
if they are established in locations where wit-
nessed cardiac arrest is likely to occur.113 Suit-
able sites might include those where the proba-
bility of cardiac arrest occurring is at least once
in every 2 years (e.g., airports, casinos, sports
facilities).103 Approximately 80% of out-of-hospital
cardiac arrests occur in private or residential
settings;114 this fact inevitably limits the overall
impact that PAD programmes can have on survival
rates. There are no studies documenting effective-
ness of home AED deployment.
References
1. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data
from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the ‘Utstein style’.
Prepared by a Task Force of Representatives from the
European Resuscitation Council, American Heart Asso-
ciation. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Aus-
tralian Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation 1991;22:1—
26.
2. Sans S, Kesteloot H, Kromhout D. The burden of cardio-
vascular diseases mortality in Europe. Task Force of the
European Society of Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mor-
A.J. Handley et al.
tality and Morbidity Statistics in Europe. Eur Heart J
1997;18:1231—48.
3. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Olsufka M, Copass MK. Chang-
ing incidence of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation,
1980—2000. JAMA 2002;288:3008—13.
4. Rea TD, Eisenberg MS, Sinibaldi G, White RD. Incidence of
EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United
States. Resuscitation 2004;63:17—24.
5. Vaillancourt C, Stiell IG. Cardiac arrest care and
emergency medical services in Canada. Can J Cardiol
2004;20:1081—90.
6. Waalewijn RA, de Vos R, Koster RW. Out-of-hospital car-
diac arrests in Amsterdam and its surrounding areas:
results from the Amsterdam resuscitation study (ARREST)
in ‘Utstein’ style. Resuscitation 1998;38:157—67.
7. Cummins R, Thies W. Automated external defibrillators and
the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Program: a new initia-
tive from the American Heart Association. Am J Emerg Med
1991;9:91—3.
8. Waalewijn RA, Nijpels MA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Preven-
tion of deterioration of ventricular fibrillation by basic life
support during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2002;54:31—6.
9. Page S, Meerabeau L. Achieving change through reflec-
tive practice: closing the loop. Nurs Educ Today
2000;20:365—72.
10. Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, Hallstrom AP.
Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a
graphic model. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1652—8.
11. Cummins RO, Ornato JP, Thies WH, Pepe PE. Improving
survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the ‘‘chain of sur-
vival’’ concept. A statement for health professionals from
the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the
Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Asso-
ciation. Circulation 1991;83:1832—47.
12. Calle PA, Lagaert L, Vanhaute O, Buylaert WA. Do victims
of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest benefit from a training
program for emergency medical dispatchers? Resuscitation
1997;35:213—8.
13. Curka PA, Pepe PE, Ginger VF, Sherrard RC, Ivy MV,
Zachariah BS. Emergency medical services priority dis-
patch. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1688—95.
14. Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Cretin S, Spaite DW, Larsen
MP. Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interven-
tions: a logistic regression survival model. Circulation
1997;96:3308—13.
15. Holmberg M, Holmberg S, Herlitz J. Factors modifying the
effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on sur-
vival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Sweden.
Eur Heart J 2001;22:511—9.
16. Holmberg M, Holmberg S, Herlitz J, Gardelov B. Survival
after cardiac arrest outside hospital in Sweden. Swedish
Cardiac Arrest Registry. Resuscitation 1998;36:29—36.
17. Waalewijn RA, De Vos R, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW. Survival
models for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
from the perspectives of the bystander, the first responder,
and the paramedic. Resuscitation 2001;51:113—22.
18. Weaver WD, Hill D, Fahrenbruch CE, et al. Use of the auto-
matic external defibrillator in the management of out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1988;319:661—6.
19. Auble TE, Menegazzi JJ, Paris PM. Effect of out-of-
hospital defibrillation by basic life support providers on
cardiac arrest mortality: a metaanalysis. Ann Emerg Med
1995;25:642—58.
20. Stiell IG, Wells GA, DeMaio VJ, et al. Modifiable factors
associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a mul-
ticenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Study Phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life
Support. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:44—50.
21. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field BJ, et al. Improved out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimiza-
tion of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study
phase II. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. JAMA
1999;281:1175—81.
22. Caffrey S. Feasibility of public access to defibrillation. Curr
Opin Crit Care 2002;8:195—8.
23. O’Rourke MF, Donaldson E, Geddes JS. An airline cardiac
arrest program. Circulation 1997;96:2849—53.
24. Page RL, Hamdan MH, McKenas DK. Defibrillation aboard
a commercial aircraft. Circulation 1998;97:1429—
30.
25. Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Nichol G, Clark LL, Spaite DW,
Hardman RG. Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by secu-
rity officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med
2000;343:1206—9.
26. Langhelle A, Nolan JP, Herlitz J, et al. Recommended guide-
lines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research
on post-resuscitation care: the Utstein style. Resuscitation
2005;66:271—83.
27. van Alem AP, Vrenken RH, de Vos R, Tijssen JG, Koster RW.
Use of automated external defibrillator by first responders
in out of hospital cardiac arrest: prospective controlled
trial. BMJ 2003;327:1312—7.
28. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Walsh TR, et al. Influence
of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in
patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. JAMA
1999;281:1182—8.
29. Wik L, Myklebust H, Auestad BH, Steen PA. Retention of
basic life support skills 6 months after training with an
automated voice advisory manikin system without instruc-
tor involvement. Resuscitation 2002;52:273—9.
30. White RD, Russell JK. Refibrillation, resuscitation and
survival in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest victims
treated with biphasic automated external defibrillators.
Resuscitation 2002;55:17—23.
31. Kerber RE, Becker LB, Bourland JD, et al. Automatic exter-
nal defibrillators for public access defibrillation: recom-
mendations for specifying and reporting arrhythmia analy-
sis algorithm performance, incorporating new waveforms,
and enhancing safety. A statement for health professionals
from the American Heart Association Task Force on Auto-
matic External Defibrillation, Subcommittee on AED Safety
and Efficacy. Circulation 1997;95:1677—82.
32. Holmberg M, Holmberg S, Herlitz J. Effect of bystander
cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest patients in Sweden. Resuscitation 2000;47:59—
70.
33. Heilman KM, Muschenheim C. Primary cutaneous tubercu-
losis resulting from mouth-to-mouth respiration. N Engl J
Med 1965;273:1035—6.
34. Christian MD, Loutfy M, McDonald LC, et al. Possible SARS
coronavirus transmission during cardiopulmonary resusci-
tation. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:287—93.
35. Cydulka RK, Connor PJ, Myers TF, Pavza G, Parker M.
Prevention of oral bacterial flora transmission by using
mouth-to-mask ventilation during CPR. J Emerg Med
1991;9:317—21.
36. Blenkharn JI, Buckingham SE, Zideman DA. Prevention of
transmission of infection during mouth-to-mouth resusci-
tation. Resuscitation 1990;19:151—7.
37. Aprahamian C, Thompson BM, Finger WA, Darin JC. Experi-
mental cervical spine injury model: evaluation of airway
management and splinting techniques. Ann Emerg Med
1984;13:584—7.
S21
38. Bahr J, Klingler H, Panzer W, Rode H, Kettler D. Skills
of lay people in checking the carotid pulse. Resuscitation
1997;35:23—6.
39. Ruppert M, Reith MW, Widmann JH, et al. Checking
for breathing: evaluation of the diagnostic capability of
emergency medical services personnel, physicians, med-
ical students, and medical laypersons. Ann Emerg Med
1999;34:720—9.
40. Perkins GD, Stephenson B, Hulme J, Monsieurs KG. Birming-
ham assessment of breathing study (BABS). Resuscitation
2005;64:109—13.
41. Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, Rivera-Rivera EJ, Fred-
eriksen SM. Prospective validation of out-of-hospital spinal
clearance criteria: a preliminary report. Acad Emerg Med
1997;4:643—6.
42. Hauff SR, Rea TD, Culley LL, Kerry F, Becker L,
Eisenberg MS. Factors impeding dispatcher-assisted tele-
phone cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med
2003;42:731—7.
43. Clark JJ, Larsen MP, Culley LL, Graves JR, Eisenberg MS.
Incidence of agonal respirations in sudden cardiac arrest.
Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:1464—7.
44. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA.
Importance of continuous chest compressions during
cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome dur-
ing a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation
2002;105:645—9.
45. Handley JA, Handley AJ. Four-step CPR—–improving skill
retention. Resuscitation 1998;36:3—8.
46. Ornato JP, Hallagan LF, McMahan SB, Peeples EH, Rostafin-
ski AG. Attitudes of BCLS instructors about mouth-to-mouth
resuscitation during the AIDS epidemic. Ann Emerg Med
1990;19:151—6.
47. Brenner BE, Van DC, Cheng D, Lazar EJ. Determinants of
reluctance to perform CPR among residents and applicants:
the impact of experience on helping behavior. Resuscita-
tion 1997;35:203—11.
48. Hew P, Brenner B, Kaufman J. Reluctance of paramedics
and emergency medical technicians to perform mouth-to-
mouth resuscitation. J Emerg Med 1997;15:279—84.
49. Baskett P, Nolan J, Parr M. Tidal volumes which are per-
ceived to be adequate for resuscitation. Resuscitation
1996;31:231—4.
50. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al.
Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Circulation 2004;109:1960—5.
51. Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ, Kubilis PS, Williams JLJ.
Influence of tidal volume on the distribution of gas
between the lungs and stomach in the nonintubated
patient receiving positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care
Med 1998;26:364—8.
52. Idris A, Gabrielli A, Caruso L. Smaller tidal volume is safe
and effective for bag-valve-ventilation, but not for mouth-
to-mouth ventilation: an animal model for basic life sup-
port. Circulation 1999;100(Suppl. I):I-644.
53. Idris A, Wenzel V, Banner MJ, Melker RJ. Smaller tidal vol-
umes minimize gastric inflation during CPR with an unpro-
tected airway. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl.):I-759.
54. Dorph E, Wik L, Steen PA. Arterial blood gases with 700
ml tidal volumes during out-of-hospital CPR. Resuscitation
2004;61:23—7.
55. Winkler M, Mauritz W, Hackl W, et al. Effects of half the
tidal volume during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on acid-
base balance and haemodynamics in pigs. Eur J Emerg Med
1998;5:201—6.
56. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of interrupting
precordial compressions on the calculated probability of
S22
defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Circulation 2002;105:2270—3.
57. Ruben H. The immediate treatment of respiratory failure.
Br J Anaesth 1964;36:542—9.
58. Elam JO. Bag-valve-mask O2 ventilation. In: Safar P, Elam
JO, editors. Advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation:
the Wolf Creek Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resusci-
tation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, Inc.; 1977. p. 73—9.
59. Dailey RH. The airway: emergency management. St. Louis,
MO: Mosby Year Book; 1992.
60. Paradis NA, Martin GB, Goetting MG, et al. Simultaneous
aortic, jugular bulb, and right atrial pressures during car-
diopulmonary resuscitation in humans. Insights into mech-
anisms. Circulation 1989;80:361—8.
61. Wik L, Hansen TB, Fylling F, et al. Delaying defibrillation to
give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with
out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial.
JAMA 2003;289:1389—95.
62. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Inter-
national consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and
emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment rec-
ommendations. Resuscitation 2005:67.
63. Handley AJ. Teaching hand placement for chest
compression—–a simpler technique. Resuscitation
2002;53:29—36.
64. Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, et al. Adverse outcomes of inter-
rupted precordial compression during automated defibril-
lation. Circulation 2002;106:368—72.
65. Swenson RD, Weaver WD, Niskanen RA, Martin J, Dahlberg
S. Hemodynamics in humans during conventional and
experimental methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Circulation 1988;78:630—9.
66. Kern KB, Sanders AB, Raife J, Milander MM, Otto CW,
Ewy GA. A study of chest compression rates during car-
diopulmonary resuscitation in humans: the importance
of rate-directed chest compressions. Arch Intern Med
1992;152:145—9.
67. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac
arrest. JAMA 2005;293:305—10.
68. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299—304.
69. Aufderheide TP, Pirrallo RG, Yannopoulos D, et al. Incom-
plete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation
of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment
of alternative manual chest compression—decompression
techniques. Resuscitation 2005;64:353—62.
70. Yannopoulos D, McKnite S, Aufderheide TP, et al. Effects
of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion
pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscita-
tion 2005;64:363—72.
71. Ochoa FJ, Ramalle-Gomara E, Carpintero JM, Garcia A, Sar-
alegui I. Competence of health professionals to check the
carotid pulse. Resuscitation 1998;37:173—5.
72. Handley AJ, Monsieurs KG, Bossaert LL. European Resusci-
tation Council Guidelines 2000 for Adult Basic Life Support.
A statement from the Basic Life Support and Automated
External Defibrillation Working Group(1) and approved by
the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation
Council. Resuscitation 2001;48:199—205.
73. Sanders AB, Kern KB, Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Heiden-
rich J, Ewy GA. Survival and neurologic outcome
after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with four different
chest compression-ventilation ratios. Ann Emerg Med
2002;40:553—62.
A.J. Handley et al.
74. Dorph E, Wik L, Stromme TA, Eriksen M, Steen PA. Quality
of CPR with three different ventilation:compression ratios.
Resuscitation 2003;58:193—201.
75. Dorph E, Wik L, Stromme TA, Eriksen M, Steen PA. Oxygen
delivery and return of spontaneous circulation with ven-
tilation:compression ratio 2:30 versus chest compressions
only CPR in pigs. Resuscitation 2004;60:309—18.
76. Babbs CF, Kern KB. Optimum compression to ventila-
tion ratios in CPR under realistic, practical conditions:
a physiological and mathematical analysis. Resuscitation
2002;54:147—57.
77. Fenici P, Idris AH, Lurie KG, Ursella S, Gabrielli A. What is
the optimal chest compression—ventilation ratio? Curr Opin
Crit Care 2005;11:204—11.
78. Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a
common and life-threatening problem during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2004;32:S345—51.
79. Chandra NC, Gruben KG, Tsitlik JE, et al. Observations of
ventilation during resuscitation in a canine model. Circula-
tion 1994;90:3070—5.
80. Becker LB, Berg RA, Pepe PE, et al. A reappraisal of mouth-
to-mouth ventilation during bystander-initiated cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. A statement for healthcare profes-
sionals from the Ventilation Working Group of the Basic Life
Support and Pediatric Life Support Subcommittees, Amer-
ican Heart Association. Resuscitation 1997;35:189—201.
81. Berg RA, Kern KB, Hilwig RW, et al. Assisted ventilation
does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-
rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circula-
tion 1997;95:1635—41.
82. Berg RA, Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Ewy GA. Assisted ventila-
tion during ‘bystander’ CPR in a swine acute myocardial
infarction model does not improve outcome. Circulation
1997;96:4364—71.
83. Handley AJ, Handley JA. Performing chest compressions in
a confined space. Resuscitation 2004;61:55—61.
84. Perkins GD, Stephenson BT, Smith CM, Gao F. A compari-
son between over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary
resuscitation. Resuscitation 2004;61:155—61.
85. Turner S, Turner I, Chapman D, et al. A comparative study
of the 1992 and 1997 recovery positions for use in the UK.
Resuscitation 1998;39:153—60.
86. Handley AJ. Recovery position. Resuscitation
1993;26:93—5.
87. Anonymous. Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resus-
citation and emergency cardiovascular care—–an interna-
tional consensus on science. Resuscitation 2000;46:1—447.
88. Fingerhut LA, Cox CS, Warner M. International compara-
tive analysis of injury mortality. Findings from the ICE on
injury statistics. International collaborative effort on injury
statistics. Adv Data 1998;12:1—20.
89. Industry DoTa. Choking. In: Home and leisure accident
report. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 1998,
p. 13—4.
90. Industry DoTa. Choking risks to children. London: Depart-
ment of Trade and Industry; 1999.
91. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Part
2. Adult basic life support. 2005 international consensus
on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardio-
vascular care science with treatment recommendations.
Resuscitation 2005;67:187—200.
92. Redding JS. The choking controversy: critique of evidence
on the Heimlich maneuver. Crit Care Med 1979;7:475—9.
93. Langhelle A, Sunde K, Wik L, Steen PA. Airway pressure with
chest compressions versus Heimlich manoeuvre in recently
dead adults with complete airway obstruction. Resuscita-
tion 2000;44:105—8.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
94. Guildner CW, Williams D, Subitch T. Airway obstructed
by foreign material: the Heimlich maneuver. JACEP
1976;5:675—7.
95. Ruben H, Macnaughton FI. The treatment of food-choking.
Practitioner 1978;221:725—9.
96. Hartrey R, Bingham RM. Pharyngeal trauma as a result of
blind finger sweeps in the choking child. J Accid Emerg Med
1995;12:52—4.
97. Elam JO, Ruben AM, Greene DG. Resuscitation of drowning
victims. JAMA 1960;174:13—6.
98. Ruben HM, Elam JO, Ruben AM, Greene DG. Investigation of
upper airway problems in resuscitation. 1. Studies of pha-
ryngeal X-rays and performance by laymen. Anesthesiology
1961;22:271—9.
99. Kabbani M, Goodwin SR. Traumatic epiglottis following
blind finger sweep to remove a pharyngeal foreign body.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1995;34:495—7.
100. Eftestol T, Wik L, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of cardiopul-
monary resuscitation on predictors of ventricular fibrilla-
tion defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Circulation 2004;110:10—5.
101. Jacobs IG, Finn JC, Oxer HF, Jelinek GA. CPR before defibril-
lation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial.
Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:39—45.
102. Monsieurs KG, Vogels C, Bossaert LL, Meert P, Calle PA.
A study comparing the usability of fully automatic ver-
sus semi-automatic defibrillation by untrained nursing stu-
dents. Resuscitation 2005;64:41—7.
103. The Public Access Defibrillation Trial Investigators.
Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2004;351:637—
46.
104. Priori SBL, Chamberlain D, Napolitano C, Arntz HR, Koster
R, Monsieurs K, Capucci A, Wellens H. Policy Statement:
ESC-ERC recommendations for the use of AEDs in Europe.
Eur Heart J 2004;25:437—45.
S23
105. Priori SG, Bossaert LL, Chamberlain DA, et al. Policy state-
ment: ESC-ERC recommendations for the use of auto-
mated external defibrillators (AEDs) in Europe. Resuscita-
tion 2004;60:245—52.
106. White RD, Bunch TJ, Hankins DG. Evolution of a community-
wide early defibrillation programme experience over 13
years using police/fire personnel and paramedics as respon-
ders. Resuscitation 2005;65:279—83.
107. Mosesso Jr VN, Davis EA, Auble TE, Paris PM, Yealy DM. Use
of automated external defibrillators by police officers for
treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med
1998;32:200—7.
108. Weisfeldt M, Becker L. Resuscitation after cardiac arrest.
A 3-phase time-sensitive model. JAMA 2002;288:3035—8.
109. Groh WJ, Newman MM, Beal PE, Fineberg NS, Zipes DP. Lim-
ited response to cardiac arrest by police equipped with
automated external defibrillators: lack of survival bene-
fit in suburban and rural Indiana—–the police as responder
automated defibrillation evaluation (PARADE). Acad Emerg
Med 2001;8:324—30.
110. Sayre M, Evans J, White L, Brennan T. Providing automated
external defibrillators to urban police officers in addition
to fire department rapid defibrillation program is not effec-
tive. Resuscitation 2005;66:189—96.
111. Nichol G, Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, et al. Potential cost-
effectiveness of public access defibrillation in the United
States. Circulation 1998;97:1315—20.
112. Nichol G, Valenzuela T, Roe D, Clark L, Huszti E, Wells GA.
Cost effectiveness of defibrillation by targeted responders
in public settings. Circulation 2003;108:697—703.
113. Becker L, Eisenberg M, Fahrenbruch C, Cobb L. Public loca-
tions of cardiac arrest: implications for public access defib-
rillation. Circulation 1998;97:2106—9.
114. Becker DE. Assessment and management of cardiovascular
urgencies and emergencies: cognitive and technical con-
siderations. Anesth Progress 1988;35:212—7.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S3—S6
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 1. Introduction
Jerry Nolan
It is five years since publication of the Guide-
lines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC).1 The
European Resuscitation Council (ERC) based its
own resuscitation guidelines on this document,
and these were published as a series of papers
in 2001.2—7 Resuscitation science continues to
advance, and clinical guidelines must be updated
regularly to reflect these developments and advise
healthcare providers on best practice. In between
major guideline updates (about every five years),
interim advisory statements can inform the health-
care provider about new therapies that might influ-
ence outcome significantly;8 we anticipate that
further advisory statements will be published in
response to important research findings.
The guidelines that follow do not define the
only way that resuscitation should be achieved;
they merely represent a widely accepted view of
how resuscitation can be undertaken both safely
and effectively. The publication of new and revised
treatment recommendations does not imply that
current clinical care is either unsafe or ineffective.
Consensus on science
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscita-
tion (ILCOR) was formed in 1993.9 Its mission is
to identify and review international science and
knowledge relevant to CPR, and to offer consen-
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.002
sus on treatment recommendations. The process
for the latest resuscitation guideline update began
in 2003, when ILCOR representatives established
six task forces: basic life support; advanced car-
diac life support; acute coronary syndromes; pae-
diatric life support; neonatal life support; and an
interdisciplinary task force to address overlapping
topics, such as educational issues. Each task force
identified topics requiring evidence evaluation, and
appointed international experts to review them.
To ensure a consistent and thorough approach, a
worksheet template was created containing step-
by-step directions to help the experts document
their literature review, evaluate studies, determine
levels of evidence and develop recommendations.10
A total of 281 experts completed 403 worksheets on
276 topics; 380 people from 18 countries attended
the 2005 International Consensus Conference on
ECC and CPR Science with Treatment Recommen-
dations (C2005), which took place in Dallas in
January 2005.11 Worksheet authors presented the
results of their evidence evaluations and pro-
posed summary scientific statements. After discus-
sion among all participants, these statements were
refined and, whenever possible, supported by treat-
ment recommendations. These summary science
statements and treatment recommendations have
been published in the 2005 International Consensus
on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency
Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Rec-
ommendations (CoSTR).12
S4 Jerry Nolan

From science to guidelines Table 1.1 Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests

(21,175) by aetiology.19
The resuscitation organisations forming ILCOR will
Aetiology Number (%)
publish individual resuscitation guidelines that are
consistent with the science in the consensus docu- Presumed cardiac disease 17451 (82.4)
ment, but will also consider geographic, economic Non-cardiac internal aetiologies 1814 (8.6)
and system differences in practice, and the avail- Lung disease 901 (4.3)
ability of medical devices and drugs. These 2005 Cerebrovascular disease 457 (2.2)
ERC Resuscitation Guidelines are derived from the Cancer 190 (0.9)
CoSTR document but represent consensus among Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 71 (0.3)
members of the ERC Executive Committee. The Obstetric/paediatric 50 (0.2)
Pulmonary embolism 38 (0.2)
ERC Executive Committee considers these new rec-
Epilepsy 36 (0.2)
ommendations to be the most effective and eas-
Diabetes mellitus 30 (0.1)
ily learned interventions that can be supported Renal disease 23 (0.1)
by current knowledge, research and experience.
Inevitably, even within Europe, differences in the Non-cardiac external aetiologies 1910 (9.0)
Trauma 657 (3.1)
availability of drugs, equipment, and personnel will
Asphyxia 465 (2.2)
necessitate local, regional and national adaptation
Drug overdose 411 (1.9)
of these guidelines. Drowning 105 (0.5)
Other suicide 194 (0.9)
Other external 50 (0.2)
Demographics Electric shock/lightning 28 (0.1)

Ischaemic heart disease is the leading cause of

death in the world.13—17 Sudden cardiac arrest is
responsible for more than 60% of adult deaths
includes prevention of conditions leading to the
from coronary heart disease.18 Based on data from
cardiopulmonary arrest, early CPR, early activa-
Scotland and from five cities in other parts of
tion of the emergency services and early advanced
Europe, the annual incidence of resuscitation for
life support. In hospital, the importance of early
out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest of cardiac
recognition of the critically ill patient and activa-
aetiology is 49.5—66 per 100,000 population.19,20
tion of a medical emergency team (MET) is now well
The Scottish study includes data on 21,175 out-
accepted.23 Previous resuscitation guidelines have
of-hospital cardiac arrests, and provides valuable
provided relatively little information on treatment
information on aetiology (Table 1.1). The incidence
of the patient during the post-resuscitation care
of in-hospital cardiac arrest is difficult to assess
phase. There is substantial variability in the way
because it is influenced heavily by factors such as
comatose survivors of cardiac arrest are treated
the criteria for hospital admission and implementa-
in the initial hours and first few days after return
tion of a do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) pol-
of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Differences in
icy. In a general hospital in the UK, the incidence
treatment at this stage may account for some of
of primary cardiac arrest (excluding those with
the interhospital variability in outcome after car-
DNAR and those arresting in the emergency depart-
diac arrest.24 The importance of recognising crit-
ment) was 3.3/1000 admissions;21 using the same
ical illness and/or angina and preventing cardiac
exclusion criteria, the incidence of cardiac arrest
arrest (in- or out-of-hospital), and post resuscita-
in a Norwegian University hospital was 1.5/1000
tion care has been highlighted by the inclusion of
admissions.22
these elements in a new four-ring Chain of Sur-
vival. The first link indicates the importance of
recognising those at risk of cardiac arrest and call-
The Chain of Survival ing for help in the hope that early treatment can
prevent arrest. The central links in this new chain
The actions linking the victim of sudden cardiac depict the integration of CPR and defibrillation as
arrest with survival are called the Chain of Sur- the fundamental components of early resuscitation
vival. They include early recognition of the emer- in an attempt to restore life. The final link, effec-
gency and activation of the emergency services, tive post resuscitation care, is targeted at preserv-
early CPR, early defibrillation and early advanced ing function, particularly of the brain and heart
life support. The infant-and-child Chain of Survival (Figure 1.1).25,26
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 1.1 ERC Chain of Survival.
The universal algorithm
The adult basic, adult advanced and paediatric
resuscitation algorithms have been updated to
reflect changes in the ERC Guidelines. Every effort
has been made to keep these algorithms simple
yet applicable to cardiac arrest victims in most
circumstances. Rescuers begin CPR if the victim
is unconscious or unresponsive, and not breath-
ing normally (ignoring occasional gasps). A single
compression—ventilation (CV) ratio of 30:2 is used
for the single rescuer of an adult or child (exclud-
ing neonates) out of hospital, and for all adult CPR.
This single ratio is designed to simplify teaching,
promote skill retention, increase the number of
compressions given and decrease interruption to
compressions. Once a defibrillator is attached, if
a shockable rhythm is confirmed, a single shock
is delivered. Irrespective of the resultant rhythm,
chest compressions and ventilations (2 min with a
CV ratio of 30:2) are resumed immediately after the
shock to minimise the ‘no-flow’ time. Advanced life
support interventions are outlined in a box at the
centre of the ALS algorithm (see Section 4). Once
the airway is secured with a tracheal tube, laryn-
geal mask airway (LMA) or Combitube, the lungs
are ventilated at a rate of 10 min−1 without pausing
during chest compressions.
Quality of CPR
Interruptions to chest compressions must be min-
imised. On stopping chest compressions, the coro-
nary flow decreases substantially; on resuming
chest compressions, several compressions are nec-
essary before the coronary flow recovers to its
previous level.27 Recent evidence indicates that
unnecessary interruptions to chest compressions
S5
occur frequently both in and out of hospital.28—31
Resuscitation instructors must emphasise the
importance of minimising interruptions to chest
compressions.
Summary
It is intended that these new guidelines will
improve the practice of resuscitation and, ulti-
mately, the outcome from cardiac arrest. The
universal ratio of 30 compressions to two ventila-
tions should decrease the number of interruptions
in compression, reduce the likelihood of hyper-
ventilation, simplify instruction for teaching and
improve skill retention. The single-shock strat-
egy should minimise ‘no-flow’ time. Resuscitation
course materials are being updated to reflect these
new guidelines.
References
1. American Heart Association, In collaboration with Interna-
tional Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Guidelines for
cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascu-
lar care—–an international consensus on science. Resuscita-
tion 2000;46:3—430.
2. Handley AJ, Monsieurs KG, Bossaert LL, European Resus-
citation Council Guidelines 2000 for Adult Basic Life Sup-
port. A statement from the Basic Life Support and Auto-
mated External Defibrillation Working Group. Resuscitation
2001;48:199—205.
3. Monsieurs KG, Handley AJ, Bossaert LL, European Resuscita-
tion Council Guidelines 2000 for Automated External Defib-
rillation. A statement from the Basic Life Support and Auto-
mated External Defibrillation Working Group. Resuscitation
2001;48:207—9.
4. de Latorre F, Nolan J, Robertson C, Chamberlain D, Baskett
P, European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2000 for Adult
Advanced Life Support. A statement from the Advanced Life
Support Working Group. Resuscitation 2001;48:211—21.
S6
5. Phillips B, Zideman D, Garcia-Castrillo L, Felix M, Shwarz-
Schwierin U, European Resuscitation Council Guidelines
2000 for Basic Paediatric Life Support. A statement from
the Paediatric Life Support Working Group. Resuscitation
2001;48:223—9.
6. Phillips B, Zideman D, Garcia-Castrillo L, Felix M, Shwarz-
Schwierin V, European Resuscitation Council Guidelines
2000 for Advanced Paediatric Life Support. A statement
from Paediatric Life Support Working Group. Resuscitation
2001;48:231—4.
7. Phillips B, Zideman D, Wyllie J, Richmond S, van Reempts
P, European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2000 for Newly
Born Life Support. A statement from the Paediatric Life Sup-
port Working Group. Resuscitation 2001;48:235—9.
8. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Vanden Hoek TL, Hickey RW. Therapeu-
tic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. An advisory statement
by the Advancement Life support Task Force of the Inter-
national Liaison committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation
2003;57:231—5.
9. The Founding Members of the International Liaison Commit-
tee on Resuscitation. The International Liaison Committee
on Resuscitation (ILCOR)—–past, present and future. Resus-
citation 2005;67:157—61.
10. Morley P, Zaritsky A. The evidence evaluation process for the
2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscita-
tion and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treat-
ment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2005;67:167—70.
11. Nolan JP, Hazinski MF, Steen PA, Becker LB. Controversial
topics from the 2005 International Consensus Conference on
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascu-
lar Care Science with treatment recommendations. Resusci-
tation 2005;67:175—9.
12. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005
International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment
Recommendations. Resuscitation 2005;67:157—341.
13. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions
of the world: global burden of disease study. Lancet
1997;349:1269—76.
14. Sans S, Kesteloot H, Kromhout D. The burden of cardiovas-
cular diseases mortality in Europe. Task Force of the Euro-
pean Society of Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mortality and
Morbidity Statistics in Europe. Eur Heart J 1997;18:1231—
48.
15. Kesteloot H, Sans S, Kromhout D. Evolution of all-causes
and cardiovascular mortality in the age-group 75—84 years
in Europe during the period 1970—1996; a comparison with
worldwide changes. Eur Heart J 2002;23:384—98.
16. Fox R. Trends in cardiovascular mortality in Europe. Circula-
tion 1997;96:3817.
Jerry Nolan
17. Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Trends in mor-
tality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in
Europe and other areas of the world. Heart 2002;88:119—
24.
18. Zheng ZJ, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Sudden car-
diac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation
2001;104:2158—63.
19. Pell JP, Sirel JM, Marsden AK, Ford I, Walker NL, Cobbe SM.
Presentation, management, and outcome of out of hospital
cardiopulmonary arrest: comparison by underlying aetiology.
Heart 2003;89:839—42.
20. Herlitz J, Bahr J, Fischer M, Kuisma M, Lexow K, Thorgeirsson
G. Resuscitation in Europe: a tale of five European regions.
Resuscitation 1999;41:121—31.
21. Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlackonikolis I, et al. Incidence,
location and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest
in a district general hospital. Resuscitation 2002;54:115—23.
22. Skogvoll E, Isern E, Sangolt GK, Gisvold SE. In-hospital car-
diopulmonary resuscitation. 5 years’ incidence and survival
according to the Utstein template. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
1999;43:177—84.
23. The MERIT study investigators. Introduction of the medical
emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised con-
trolled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2091—7.
24. Langhelle A, Tyvold SS, Lexow K, Hapnes SA, Sunde K, Steen
PA. In-hospital factors associated with improved outcome
after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A comparison between
four regions in Norway. Resuscitation 2003;56:247—63.
25. Langhelle A, Nolan J, Herlitz J, et al. Recommended guide-
lines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research on
post-resuscitation care: The Utstein style. Resuscitation
2005;66:271—83.
26. Perkins GD, Soar J. In hospital cardiac arrest: missing links
in the chain of survival. Resuscitation 2005;66:253—5.
27. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Ewy GA. Efficacy of chest
compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded
airway. Resuscitation 1998;39:179—88.
28. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299—304.
29. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of car-
diopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest.
JAMA 2005;293:305—10.
30. Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, et al. Chest compression
rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal:
a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circu-
lation 2005;111:428—34.
31. Valenzuela TD, Kern KB, Clark LL, et al. Interruptions of chest
compressions during emergency medical systems resuscita-
tion. Circulation 2005;112:1259—65.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S25—S37
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 3. Electrical therapies: Automated
external defibrillators, defibrillation,
cardioversion and pacing
Charles D. Deakin, Jerry P. Nolan
Introduction
This section presents guidelines for defibrillation
using both automated external defibrillators (AEDs)
and manual defibrillators. All healthcare providers
and lay responders can use AEDs as an integral com-
ponent of basic life support. Manual defibrillation is
used as part of advanced life support (ALS) therapy.
In addition, synchronised cardioversion and pacing
are ALS functions of many defibrillators and are also
discussed in this section.
Defibrillation is the passage across the myocard-
ium of an electrical current of sufficient magnitude
to depolarise a critical mass of myocardium and
enable restoration of coordinated electrical activ-
ity. Defibrillation is defined as the termination of
fibrillation or, more precisely, the absence of ven-
tricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT)
at 5 s after shock delivery; however, the goal of
attempted defibrillation is to restore spontaneous
circulation.
Defibrillator technology is advancing rapidly. AED
interaction with the rescuer through voice prompts
is now established, and future technology may
enable more specific instructions to be given by
voice prompt. The ability of defibrillators to assess
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.008
the rhythm while CPR is in progress is required to
prevent unnecessary delays in CPR. Waveform anal-
ysis may also enable the defibrillator to calculate
the optimal time at which to give a shock.
A vital link in the chain of survival
Defibrillation is a key link in the Chain of Survival
and is one of the few interventions that have been
shown to improve outcome from VF/VT cardiac
arrest. The previous guidelines, published in 2000,
rightly emphasised the importance of early defib-
rillation with minimum delay.1
The probability of successful defibrillation and
subsequent survival to hospital discharge declines
rapidly with time2,3 and the ability to deliver
early defibrillation is one of the most important
factors in determining survival from cardiac
arrest. For every minute that passes following
collapse and defibrillation, mortality increases
7%—10% in the absence of bystander CPR.2—4 EMS
systems do not generally have the capability to
deliver defibrillation through traditional paramedic
responders within the first few minutes of a call,
and the alternative use of trained lay responders
S26 C.D. Deakin, J.P. Nolan

to deliver prompt defibrillation using AEDs is now Automated external defibrillators have been
widespread. EMS systems that have reduced time to tested extensively against libraries of recorded
defibrillation following cardiac arrest using trained cardiac rhythms and in many trials in adults18,19
lay responders have reported greatly improved and children.20,21 They are extremely accurate in
survival-to-discharge rates,5—7 some as high as rhythm analysis. Although AEDs are not designed to
75% if defibrillation is performed within 3 min of deliver synchronised shocks, all AEDs will recom-
collapse.8 This concept has also been extended to mend shocks for VT if the rate and R-wave mor-
in-hospital cardiac arrests where staff, other than phology exceed preset values.
doctors, are also being trained to defibrillate using
an AED before arrival of the cardiac arrest team.
When bystander CPR is provided, the reduction in In-hospital use of AEDs
survival rate is more gradual and averages 3%—4%
At the time of the 2005 Consensus Confer-
per minute from collapse to defibrillation;2—4
ence, there were no published randomised trials
bystander CPR can double2,3,9 or treble10 sur-
comparing in-hospital use of AEDs with manual
vival from witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac
defibrillators. Two lower level studies of adults
arrest.
with in-hospital cardiac arrest from shockable
All healthcare providers with a duty to perform
rhythms showed higher survival-to-hospital dis-
CPR should be trained, equipped, and encouraged
charge rates when defibrillation was provided
to perform defibrillation and CPR. Early defibrilla-
through an AED programme than with manual defib-
tion should be available throughout all hospitals,
rillation alone.22,23 A manikin study showed that
outpatient medical facilities and public areas of
use of an AED significantly increased the likelihood
mass gathering (see Section 2). Those trained in
of delivering three shocks, but increased the time
AED use should also be trained to deliver at least
to deliver the shocks when compared with manual
external chest compressions before the arrival of
defibrillators.24 In contrast, a study of mock arrests
ALS providers, to optimise the effectiveness of early
in simulated patients showed that use of monitor-
defibrillation.
ing leads and fully automated defibrillators reduced
time to defibrillation when compared with manual
defibrillators.25
Automated external defibrillators
Delayed defibrillation may occur when patients
sustain cardiac arrest in unmonitored hospital beds
Automated external defibrillators are sophisti-
and in outpatient departments. In these areas sev-
cated, reliable computerised devices that use voice
eral minutes may elapse before resuscitation teams
and visual prompts to guide lay rescuers and health-
arrive with a defibrillator and deliver shocks.26
care professionals to safely attempt defibrillation
Despite limited evidence, AEDs should be consid-
in cardiac arrest victims. Automated defibrillators
ered for the hospital setting as a way to facilitate
have been described as ‘‘. . . the single greatest
early defibrillation (a goal of <3 min from collapse),
advance in the treatment of VF cardiac arrest since
especially in areas where staff have no rhythm
the development of CPR.’’11 Advances in technol-
recognition skills or where they use defibrillators
ogy, particularly with respect to battery capacity,
infrequently. An effective system for training and
and software arrhythmia analysis have enabled the
retraining should be in place. Adequate numbers of
mass production of relatively cheap, reliable and
staff should be trained to enable achievement of
easily operated portable defibrillators.12—15 Use of
the goal of providing the first shock within 3 min of
AEDs by lay or non-healthcare rescuers is covered
collapse anywhere in the hospital. Hospitals should
in Section 2.
monitor collapse-to-first-shock intervals and resus-
citation outcomes.
Automated rhythm analysis
Automated external defibrillators have micropro-
cessors that analyse several features of the ECG, Strategies before defibrillation
including frequency and amplitude. Some AEDs are
programmed to detect spontaneous movement by Safe use of oxygen during defibrillation
the patient or others. Developing technology should
soon enable AEDs to provide information about In an oxygen-enriched atmosphere, sparking from
frequency and depth of chest compressions dur- poorly applied defibrillator paddles can cause a
ing CPR that may improve BLS performance by all fire.27—32 There are several reports of fires being
rescuers.16,17 caused in this way, and most have resulted in
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
significant burns to the patient. The risk of fire dur-
ing attempted defibrillation can be minimised by
taking the following precautions.
• Take off any oxygen mask or nasal cannulae and
place them at least 1 m away from the patient’s
chest.
• Leave the ventilation bag connected to the tra-
cheal tube or other airway adjunct. Alterna-
tively, disconnect any bag-valve device from the
tracheal tube (or other airway adjunct such as
the laryngeal mask airway, combitube or laryn-
geal tube), and remove it at least 1 m from the
patient’s chest during defibrillation.
• If the patient is connected to a ventilator, for
example in the operating room or critical care
unit, leave the ventilator tubing (breathing cir-
cuit) connected to the tracheal tube unless chest
compressions prevent the ventilator from deliv-
ering adequate tidal volumes. In this case, the
ventilator is usually substituted for a ventila-
tion bag, which can itself be left connected or
detached and removed to a distance of at least
1 m. If the ventilator tubing is disconnected,
ensure it is kept at least 1 m from the patient
or, better still, switch the ventilator off; mod-
ern ventilators generate massive oxygen flows
when disconnected. During normal use, when
connected to a tracheal tube, oxygen from a ven-
tilator in the critical care unit will be vented from
the main ventilator housing well away from the
defibrillation zone. Patients in the critical care
unit may be dependent on positive end expiratory
pressure (PEEP) to maintain adequate oxygena-
tion; during cardioversion, when the spontaneous
circulation potentially enables blood to remain
well oxygenated, it is particularly appropriate to
leave the critically ill patient connected to the
ventilator during shock delivery.
• Minimise the risk of sparks during defibrillation.
Theoretically, self-adhesive defibrillation pads
are less likely to cause sparks than manual pad-
dles.
The technique for electrode contact with
the chest
Optimal defibrillation technique aims to deliver
current across the fibrillating myocardium in the
presence of minimal transthoracic impedance.
Transthoracic impedance varies considerably with
body mass, but is approximately 70—80
in
adults.33,34 The techniques described below aim to
place external electrodes (paddles or self-adhesive
pads) in an optimal position using techniques that
minimise transthoracic impedance.
S27
Shaving the chest
Patients with a hairy chest have air trapping
beneath the electrode and poor electrode-to-skin
electrical contact. This causes high impedance,
reduced defibrillation efficacy, risk of arcing
(sparks) from electrode to skin and electrode
to electrode and is more likely to cause burns
to the patient’s chest. Rapid shaving of the
area of intended electrode placement may be
necessary, but do not delay defibrillation if a
shaver is not immediately available. Shaving the
chest per se may reduce transthoracic impedance
slightly and has been recommended for elective DC
cardioversion.35
Paddle force
If using paddles, apply them firmly to the chest
wall. This reduces transthoracic impedance by
improving electrical contact at the electrode—skin
interface and reducing thoracic volume.36 The
defibrillator operator should always press firmly
on handheld electrode paddles, the optimal force
being 8 kg in adults37 and 5 kg in children aged
1—8 years when using adult paddles38 ; 8-kg force
may be attainable only by the strongest mem-
bers of the cardiac arrest team, and therefore it
is recommended that these individuals apply the
paddles during defibrillation. Unlike self-adhesive
pads, manual paddles have a bare metal plate that
requires a conductive material placed between the
metal and patient’s skin to improve electrical con-
tact. Use of bare metal paddles alone creates high
transthoracic impedance and is likely to increase
the risk of arcing and to worsen cutaneous burns
from defibrillation.
Electrode position
No human studies have evaluated the electrode
position as a determinant of return of spontaneous
circulation (ROSC) or survival from VF/VT cardiac
arrest. Transmyocardial current during defibrilla-
tion is likely to be maximal when the electrodes
are placed so that the area of the heart that is fib-
rillating lies directly between them, i.e., ventricles
in VF/VT, atria in atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore,
the optimal electrode position may not be the same
for ventricular and atrial arrhythmias.
More patients are presenting with implantable
medical devices (e.g., permanent pacemaker,
automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
(AICD)). MedicAlert bracelets are recommended for
such patients. These devices may be damaged dur-
ing defibrillation if current is discharged through
S28
electrodes placed directly over the device. Place
the electrode away from the device or use an alter-
native electrode position as described below. On
detecting VF/VT, AICD devices will discharge no
more than six times. Further discharges will occur
only if a new episode of VF/VT is detected. Rarely,
a faulty device or broken lead may cause repeated
firing; in these circumstances, the patient is likely
to be conscious, with the ECG showing a relatively
normal rate. A magnet placed over the AICD will
disable the defibrillation function in these circum-
stances. AICD discharge may cause pectoral muscle
contraction, but an attendant touching the patient
will not receive an electric shock. AICD and pacing
function should always be re-evaluated following
external defibrillation, both to check the device
itself and to check pacing/defibrillation thresholds
of the device leads.
Transdermal drug patches may prevent good
electrode contact, causing arcing and burns if the
electrode is placed directly over the patch during
defibrillation.39,40 Remove medication patches and
wipe the area before applying the electrode.
For ventricular arrhythmias, place electrodes
(either pads or paddles) in the conventional
sternal—apical position. The right (sternal) elec-
trode is placed to the right of the sternum, below
the clavicle. The apical paddle is placed in the mid-
axillary line, approximately level with the V6 ECG
electrode or female breast. This position should
be clear of any breast tissue. It is important that
this electrode is placed sufficiently laterally. Other
acceptable pad positions include:
• each electrode on the lateral chest wall, one
on the right and the other on the left side (bi-
axillary);
• one electrode in the standard apical position and
the other on the right or left upper back;
• one electrode anteriorly, over the left pre-
cordium, and the other electrode posterior to the
heart just inferior to the left scapula.
It does not matter which electrode (apex/
sternum) is placed in either position.
Transthoracic impedance has been shown to be
minimised when the apical electrode is not placed
over the female breast.41 Asymmetrically shaped
apical electrodes have a lower impedance when
placed longitudinally rather than transversely.42
The long axis of the apical paddle should therefore
be orientated in a craniocaudal direction.
Atrial fibrillation is maintained by functional
re-entry circuits anchored in the left atrium. As
the left atrium is located posteriorly in the tho-
rax, an anteroposterior electrode position may be
more efficient for external cardioversion of atrial
C.D. Deakin, J.P. Nolan
fibrillation.43 Most,44,45 but not all,46,47 studies
have shown that anteroposterior electrode place-
ment is more effective than the traditional antero-
apical position in elective cardioversion of atrial
fibrillation. Efficacy of cardioversion may be less
dependent on electrode position when using bipha-
sic impedance-compensated waveforms.48 Either
position is safe and effective for cardioversion of
atrial arrhythmias.
Respiratory phase
Transthoracic impedance varies during respiration,
being minimal at end expiration. If possible, defib-
rillation should be attempted at this phase of
the respiratory cycle. Positive end-expiratory pres-
sure (PEEP) increases transthoracic impedance and
should be minimised during defibrillation. Auto-
PEEP (gas trapping) may be particularly high in
asthmatics and may necessitate higher than usual
energy levels for defibrillation.49
Electrode size
The Association for the Advancement of Medi-
cal Instrumentation recommends a minimum elec-
trode size of for individual electrodes and the
sum of the electrode areas should be a mini-
mum of 150 cm2 .50 Larger electrodes have lower
impedance, but excessively large electrodes may
result in less transmyocardial current flow.51 For
adult defibrillation, both handheld paddle elec-
trodes and self-adhesive pad electrodes 8—12 cm
in diameter are used and function well. Defib-
rillation success may be higher with electrodes
of 12-cm diameter compared with those of 8-cm
diameter.34,52
Standard AEDs are suitable for use in children
over the age of 8 years. In children between 1 and
8 years, use paediatric pads with an attenuator
to reduce delivered energy, or a paediatric mode,
if they are available; if not, use the unmodified
machine, taking care to ensure that the adult pads
do not overlap. Use of AEDs is not recommended in
children less than 1 year.
Coupling agents
If using manual paddles, gel pads are preferable
to electrode pastes and gels because the latter
can spread between the two paddles, creating the
potential for a spark. Do not use bare electrodes
without a coupling material, because this causes
high transthoracic impedance and may increase the
severity of any cutaneous burns. Do not use med-
ical gels or pastes of poor electrical conductivity
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
(e.g., ultrasound gel). Electrode pads are preferred
to electrode gel because they avoid the risk of
smearing gel between the two paddles and the sub-
sequent risk of arcing and ineffective defibrillation.
Pads versus paddles
Self-adhesive defibrillation pads are safe and effec-
tive and are preferable to standard defibrillation
paddles.52 Consideration should be given to use
of self-adhesive pads in peri-arrest situations and
in clinical situations where patient access is diffi-
cult. They have a similar transthoracic impedance51
(and therefore efficacy)53,54 to manual paddles,
and enable the operator to defibrillate the patient
from a safe distance rather than leaning over the
patient (as occurs with paddles). When used for ini-
tial monitoring of a rhythm, both pads and paddles
enable quicker delivery of the first shock compared
with standard ECG electrodes, but pads are quicker
than paddles.55
When gel pads are used with paddles, the elec-
trolyte gel becomes polarised and thus is a poor
conductor after defibrillation. This can cause spu-
rious asystole that may persist for 3—4 min when
used to monitor the rhythm; a phenomenon not
reported with self-adhesive pads.56,57 When using
a gel pad/paddle combination, confirm a diagnosis
of asystole with independent ECG electrodes rather
than the paddles.
Fibrillation waveform analysis
It is possible to predict, with varying reliability,
the success of defibrillation from the fibrillation
waveform.58—77 If optimal defibrillation waveforms
and the optimal timing of shock delivery can be
determined in prospective studies, it should be pos-
sible to prevent the delivery of unsuccessful high-
energy shocks and minimise myocardial injury. This
technology is under active development and inves-
tigation.
CPR versus defibrillation as the initial
treatment
Although the previous guidelines have recom-
mended immediate defibrillation for all shockable
rhythms, recent evidence has suggested that a
period of CPR before defibrillation may be bene-
ficial after prolonged collapse. In clinical studies
where response times exceeded 4—5 min, a period
of 1.5—3 min of CPR by paramedics or EMS physi-
cians before shock delivery improved ROSC, sur-
vival to hospital discharge78,79 and 1-year survival79
for adults with out-of-hospital VF or VT, compared
S29
with immediate defibrillation. In contrast, a sin-
gle randomised study in adults with out-of-hospital
VF or VT failed to show improvements in ROSC or
survival following 1.5 min of paramedic CPR.80 In
animal studies of VF lasting at least 5 min, CPR
before defibrillation improved haemodynamics and
survival.81—83 It may not be possible to extrapo-
late the outcomes achieved by paramedic-provided
CPR, which includes intubation and delivery of 100%
oxygen,79 to those that may be achieved by laypeo-
ple providing relative poor-quality CPR with mouth-
to-mouth ventilation.
It is reasonable for EMS personnel to give a period
of about 2 min of CPR (i.e., about five cycles at
30:2) before defibrillation in patients with pro-
longed collapse (>5 min). The duration of collapse
is frequently difficult to estimate accurately, and it
may be simplest if EMS personnel are instructed to
provide this period of CPR before attempted defib-
rillation in any cardiac arrest they have not wit-
nessed. Given the relatively weak evidence avail-
able, individual EMS directors should determine
whether to implement a CPR-before-defibrillation
strategy; inevitably, protocols will vary depending
on the local circumstances.
Laypeople and first responders using AEDS should
deliver the shock as soon as possible.
There is no evidence to support or refute CPR
before defibrillation for in-hospital cardiac arrest.
We recommend shock delivery as soon as possible
following in-hospital cardiac arrest (see Section 4b
and c).
The importance of early uninterrupted external
chest compression is emphasised throughout these
guidelines. In practice, it is often difficult to ascer-
tain the exact time of collapse and, in any case,
CPR should be started as soon as possible. The res-
cuer providing chest compressions should interrupt
chest compressions only for rhythm analysis and
shock delivery, and should be prepared to resume
chest compressions as soon as a shock is delivered.
When two rescuers are present, the rescuer operat-
ing the AED should apply the electrodes while CPR
is in progress. Interrupt CPR only when it is nec-
essary to assess the rhythm and deliver a shock.
The AED operator should be prepared to deliver a
shock as soon as analysis is complete and the shock
is advised, ensuring all rescuers are not in contact
with the victim. The single rescuer should practice
coordination of CPR with efficient AED operation.
One-shock versus three-shock sequence
There are no published human or animal studies
comparing a single-shock protocol with a three-
S30 C.D. Deakin, J.P. Nolan

stacked-shock protocol for treatment of VF car-

diac arrest. Animal studies show that relatively
short interruptions in external chest compression
to deliver rescue breaths84,85 or perform rhythm
analysis86 are associated with post-resuscitation
myocardial dysfunction and reduced survival.
Interruptions in external chest compression also
reduce the chances of converting VF to another
rhythm.87 Analysis of CPR performance during out-
of-hospital16,88 and in-hospital17 cardiac arrest has
shown that significant interruptions are common,
with external chest compressions comprising no
more than 51%16 to 76%17 of total CPR time.
In the context of a three-shock protocol being
recommended in the 2000 guidelines, interruptions
in CPR to enable rhythm analysis by AEDs were
Figure 3.1 Monophasic damped sinusoidal waveform
significant. Delays of up to 37 s between delivery
(MDS).
of shocks and recommencing chest compressions
have been reported.89 With first shock efficacy of of repetitive shocks, which in turn limits myocardial
biphasic waveforms exceeding 90%,90—93 failure to damage.95
cardiovert VF successfully is more likely to suggest After a cautious introduction a decade ago,
the need for a period of CPR rather than a fur- defibrillators delivering a shock with a biphasic
ther shock. Thus, immediately after giving a single waveform are now preferred. Monophasic defibril-
shock, and without reassessing the rhythm or feel- lators are no longer manufactured, although many
ing for a pulse, resume CPR (30 compressions:2 ven- remain in use. Monophasic defibrillators deliver cur-
tilations) for 2 min before delivering another shock rent that is unipolar (i.e., one direction of cur-
(if indicated) (see Section 4c). Even if the defibril- rent flow). There are two main types of monopha-
lation attempt is successful in restoring a perfusing sic waveform. The commonest waveform is the
rhythm, it is very rare for a pulse to be palpable monophasic damped sinusoidal (MDS) waveform
immediately after defibrillation, and the delay in (Figure 3.1) which gradually returns to zero current
trying to palpate a pulse will further compromise flow. The monophasic truncated exponential (MTE)
the myocardium if a perfusing rhythm has not been waveform is electronically terminated before cur-
restored.89 In one study of AEDs in out-of-hospital rent flow reaches zero (Figure 3.2). Biphasic defib-
VF cardiac arrest, a pulse was detected in only 2.5% rillators, in contrast, deliver current that flows in
(12/481) of patients with the initial post shock pulse a positive direction for a specified duration before
check, though a pulse was detected sometime after reversing and flowing in a negative direction for the
the initial shock sequence (and before a second remaining milliseconds of the electrical discharge.
shock sequence) in 24.5% (118/481) of patients.93 If There are two main types of biphasic waveform: the
a perfusing rhythm has been restored, giving chest biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) (Figure 3.3)
compressions does not increase the chance of VF and rectilinear biphasic (RLB) (Figure 3.4). Bipha-
recurring.94 In the presence of post-shock asystole sic defibrillators compensate for the wide varia-
chest compressions may induce VF.94 tions in transthoracic impedance by electronically
This single shock strategy is applicable to both
monophasic and biphasic defibrillators.

Waveforms and energy levels

Defibrillation requires the delivery of sufficient

electrical energy to defibrillate a critical mass of
myocardium, abolish the wavefronts of VF and
enable restoration of spontaneous synchronised
electrical activity in the form of an organised
rhythm. The optimal energy for defibrillation is
that which achieves defibrillation while causing the
minimum of myocardial damage.33 Selection of an Figure 3.2 Monophasic truncated exponential wave-
appropriate energy level also reduces the number form (MTE).
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 3.3 Biphasic truncated exponential waveform
(BTE).
adjusting the waveform magnitude and duration.
The optimal ratio of first-phase to second-phase
duration and leading-edge amplitude has not been
established. Whether different waveforms have dif-
fering efficacy for VF of differing durations is also
unknown.
All manual defibrillators and AEDs that allow
manual override of energy levels should be labelled
to indicate their waveform (monophasic or bipha-
sic) and recommended energy levels for attempted
defibrillation of VF/VT. First-shock efficacy for
long-duration VF/VT is greater with biphasic than
monophasic waveforms,96—98 and therefore use of
the former is recommended whenever possible.
Optimal energy levels for both monophasic and
biphasic waveforms are unknown. The recommen-
dations for energy levels are based on a consensus
following careful review of the current literature.
Although energy levels are selected for defibril-
lation, it is the transmyocardial current flow that
achieves defibrillation. Current correlates well with
the successful defibrillation and cardioversion.99
Figure 3.4 Rectilinear biphasic waveform (RLB).
S31
The optimal current for defibrillation using a
monophasic waveform is in the range of 30—40 A.
Indirect evidence from measurements during car-
dioversion for atrial fibrillation suggest that the cur-
rent during defibrillation using biphasic waveforms
is in the range of 15—20 A.100 Future technology
may enable defibrillators to discharge according to
transthoracic current: a strategy that may lead to
greater consistency in shock success. Peak current
amplitude, average current and phase duration all
need to be studied to determine optimal values,
and manufacturers are encouraged to explore fur-
ther this move from energy-based to current-based
defibrillation.
First shock
First-shock efficacy for long-duration cardiac arrest
using monophasic defibrillation has been reported
as 54%—63% for a 200-J monophasic truncated
exponential (MTE) waveform97,101 and 77%—91%
using a 200-J monophasic damped sinusoidal (MDS)
waveform.96—98,101 Because of the lower efficacy
of this waveform, the recommended initial energy
level for the first shock using a monophasic defib-
rillator is 360 J. Although higher energy levels risk
a greater degree of myocardial injury, the bene-
fits of earlier conversion to a perfusing rhythm are
paramount. Atrioventricular block is more common
with higher monophasic energy levels, but is gen-
erally transient and has been shown not to affect
survival to hospital discharge.102 Only 1 of 27 animal
studies demonstrated harm caused by attempted
defibrillation using high-energy shocks.103
There is no evidence that one biphasic wave-
form or device is more effective than another. First-
shock efficacy of the BTE waveform using 150—200 J
has been reported as 86%—98%.96,97,101,104,105 First-
shock efficacy of the RLB waveform using 120 J is up
to 85% (data not published in the paper but sup-
plied by personnel communication).98 The initial
biphasic shock should be no lower than 120 J for
RLB waveforms and 150 J for BTE waveforms. Ide-
ally, the initial biphasic shock energy should be at
least 150 J for all waveforms.
Manufacturers should display the effective wave-
form dose range on the face of the biphasic device.
If the provider is unaware of the effective dose
range of the device, use a dose of 200 J for the
first shock. This 200 J default energy has been cho-
sen because it falls within the reported range of
selected doses that are effective for first and subse-
quent biphasic shocks and can be provided by every
biphasic manual defibrillator available today. It is
a consensus default dose and not a recommended
ideal dose. If biphasic devices are clearly labelled
S32
and providers are familiar with the devices they use
in clinical care, there will be no need for the default
200 J dose. Ongoing research is necessary to firmly
establish the most appropriate initial settings for
both monophasic and biphasic defibrillators.
Second and subsequent shocks
With monophasic defibrillators, if the initial shock
has been unsuccessful at 360 J, second and sub-
sequent shocks should all be delivered at 360 J.
With biphasic defibrillators there is no evidence to
support either a fixed or escalating energy proto-
col. Both strategies are acceptable; however, if the
first shock is not successful and the defibrillator is
capable of delivering shocks of higher energy, it
is rational to increase the energy for subsequent
shocks. If the provider is unaware of the effective
dose range of the biphasic device and has used the
default 200 J dose for the first shock, use either
an equal or higher dose for second or subsequent
shocks, depending on the capabilities of the device.
If a shockable rhythm (recurrent ventricular fib-
rillation) recurs after successful defibrillation (with
or without ROSC), give the next shock with the
energy level that had previously been successful.
Other related defibrillation topics
Defibrillation of children
Cardiac arrest is less common in children. Aetiology
is generally related to hypoxia and trauma.106—108
VF is relatively rare compared with adult cardiac
arrest, occurring in 7%—15% of paediatric and ado-
lescent arrests.108—112 Common causes of VF in
children include trauma, congenital heart disease,
long QT interval, drug overdose and hypothermia.
Rapid defibrillation of these patients may improve
outcome.112,113
The optimal energy level, waveform and shock
sequence are unknown but, as with adults, bipha-
sic shocks appear to be at least as effective as,
and less harmful than, monophasic shocks.114—116
The upper limit for safe defibrillation is unknown,
but doses in excess of the previously recommended
maximum of 4 J kg−1 (as high as 9 J kg−1 ) have
defibrillated children effectively without signifi-
cant adverse effects.20,117,118 The recommended
energy level for manual monophasic defibrillation
is 4 J kg−1 for the initial shock and for subsequent
shocks. The same energy level is recommended for
manual biphasic defibrillation.119 As with adults, if
a shockable rhythm recurs, use the energy level for
defibrillation that had previously been successful.
C.D. Deakin, J.P. Nolan
Blind defibrillation
Delivery of shocks without a monitor or an ECG
rhythm diagnosis is referred to as ‘‘blind’’ defibril-
lation. Blind defibrillation is unnecessary. Handheld
paddles with ‘‘quick-look’’ monitoring capabilities
on modern manually operated defibrillators are
widely available. AEDs use reliable and proven deci-
sion algorithms to identify VF.
Spurious asystole and occult ventricular
fibrillation
Rarely, coarse VF can be present in some leads, with
very small undulations seen in the orthogonal leads,
which is called occult VF. A flat line that may resem-
ble asystole is displayed; examine the rhythm in
two leads to obtain the correct diagnosis. Of more
importance, one study noted that spurious asystole,
a flat line produced by technical errors (e.g., no
power, leads unconnected, gain set to low, incor-
rect lead selection, or polarisation of electrolyte
gel (see above)), was far more frequent than occult
VF.120
There is no evidence that attempting to defib-
rillate true asystole is beneficial. Studies in
children121 and adults122 have failed to show bene-
fit from defibrillation of asystole. On the contrary,
repeated shocks will cause myocardial injury.
Precordial thump
There are no prospective studies that evaluate
use of precordial (chest) thump. The rationale for
giving a thump is that the mechanical energy of
the thump is converted to electrical energy, which
may be sufficient to achieve cardioversion.123
The electrical threshold of successful defibrillation
increases rapidly after the onset of the arrhythmia,
and the amount of electrical energy generated falls
below this threshold within seconds. A precordial
thump is most likely to be successful in convert-
ing VT to sinus rhythm. Successful treatment of
VF by precordial thump is much less likely: in all
the reported successful cases, the precordial thump
was given within the first 10 s of VF.123 Although
three case series124—126 reported that VF or pulse-
less VT was converted to a perfusing rhythm by
a precordial thump, there are occasional reports
of thump causing deterioration in cardiac rhythm,
such as rate acceleration of VT, conversion of VT
into VF, complete heart block or asystole.125,127—132
Consider giving a single precordial thump when
cardiac arrest is confirmed rapidly after a wit-
nessed, sudden collapse and a defibrillator is not
immediately to hand. These circumstances are
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
most likely to occur when the patient is monitored.
Precordial thump should be undertaken immedi-
ately after confirmation of cardiac arrest and only
by healthcare professionals trained in the tech-
nique. Using the ulnar edge of a tightly clenched
fist, a sharp impact is delivered to the lower half of
the sternum from a height of about 20 cm, followed
by immediate retraction of the fist, which creates
an impulse-like stimulus.
Cardioversion
If electrical cardioversion is used to convert atrial
or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the shock must be
synchronised to occur with the R wave of the elec-
trocardiogram rather than with the T wave: VF can
be induced if a shock is delivered during the rel-
ative refractory portion of the cardiac cycle.133
Synchronisation can be difficult in VT because of
the wide-complex and variable forms of ventricular
arrhythmia. If synchronisation fails, give unsynchro-
nised shocks to the unstable patient in VT to avoid
prolonged delay in restoring sinus rhythm. Ventric-
ular fibrillation or pulseless VT requires unsynchro-
nised shocks. Conscious patients must be anaes-
thetised or sedated before attempting synchronised
cardioversion.
Atrial fibrillation
Biphasic waveforms are more effective than
monophasic waveforms for cardioversion of
AF100,134,135 ; when available, use a biphasic defib-
rillator in preference to a monophasic defibrillator.
Monophasic waveforms
A study of electrical cardioversion for atrial fib-
rillation indicated that 360-J MDS shocks were
more effective than 100-J or 200-J MDS shocks.136
Although a first shock of 360-J reduces overall
energy requirements for cardioversion, 360 J may
cause greater myocardial damage than occurs with
lower monophasic energy levels, and this must be
taken into consideration. Commence cardioversion
of atrial fibrillation using an initial energy level of
200 J, increasing in a stepwise manner as necessary.
Biphasic waveforms
More data are needed before specific recommen-
dations can be made for optimal biphasic energy
levels. First-shock efficacy of a 70-J biphasic wave-
form has been shown to be significantly greater than
that with a 100-monophasic waveform.100,134,135 A
S33
randomised study comparing escalating monophasic
energy levels to 360 J and biphasic energy levels to
200 J found no difference in efficacy between the
two waveforms.137 An initial shock of 120—150 J,
escalating if necessary, is a reasonable strategy
based on current data.
Atrial flutter and paroxysmal
supraventricular tachycardia
Atrial flutter and paroxysmal SVT generally
require less energy than atrial fibrillation for
cardioversion.138 Give an initial shock of 100-J
monophasic or 70—120 J biphasic waveform. Give
subsequent shocks using stepwise increases in
energy.99
Ventricular tachycardia
The energy required for cardioversion of VT
depends on the morphological characteristics and
rate of the arrhythmia.139 Ventricular tachycardia
with a pulse responds well to cardioversion using
initial monophasic energies of 200 J. Use biphasic
energy levels of 120—150 J for the initial shock.
Give stepwise increases if the first shock fails to
achieve sinus rhythm.139
Pacing
Consider pacing in patients with symptomatic
bradycardia refractory to anticholinergic drugs or
other second-line therapy (see Section 4f). Immedi-
ate pacing is indicated, especially when the block is
at or below the His—Purkinje level. If transthoracic
pacing is ineffective, consider transvenous pacing.
Whenever a diagnosis of asystole is made, check the
ECG carefully for the presence of P waves, because
this may respond to cardiac pacing. Do not attempt
pacing for asystole; it does not increase short-term
or long-term survival in or out of hospital.140—148
References
1. American Heart Association in collaboration with Inter-
national Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Guide-
lines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emer-
gency Cardiovascular Care, Part 6: Advanced Cardiovas-
cular Life Support: Section 2: Defibrillation. Circulation
2000;102(Suppl.):I90—4.
2. Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, Hallstrom AP.
Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a
graphic model. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1652—8.
3. Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Cretin S, Spaite DW, Larsen
MP. Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interven-
tions: a logistic regression survival model. Circulation
1997;96:3308—13.
S34
4. Waalewijn RA, de Vos R, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW. Survival
models for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation
from the perspectives of the bystander, the first responder,
and the paramedic. Resuscitation 2001;51:113—22.
5. Myerburg RJ, Fenster J, Velez M, et al. Impact of
community-wide police car deployment of automated
external defibrillators on survival from out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest. Circulation 2002;106:1058—64.
6. Capucci A, Aschieri D, Piepoli MF, Bardy GH, Iconomu
E, Arvedi M. Tripling survival from sudden cardiac
arrest via early defibrillation without traditional edu-
cation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation
2002;106:1065—70.
7. van Alem AP, Vrenken RH, de Vos R, Tijssen JG, Koster RW.
Use of automated external defibrillator by first responders
in out of hospital cardiac arrest: prospective controlled
trial. BMJ 2003;327:1312.
8. Valenzuela TD, Bjerke HS, Clark LL, et al. Rapid defibrilla-
tion by nontraditional responders: the Casino Project. Acad
Emerg Med 1998;5:414—5.
9. Swor RA, Jackson RE, Cynar M, et al. Bystander CPR,
ventricular fibrillation, and survival in witnessed, unmon-
itored out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med
1995;25:780—4.
10. Holmberg M, Holmberg S, Herlitz J. Effect of bystander
cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest patients in Sweden. Resuscitation 2000;47:59—70.
11. Monsieurs KG, Handley AJ, Bossaert LL. European Resus-
citation Council Guidelines 2000 for Automated External
Defibrillation. A statement from the Basic Life Support and
Automated External Defibrillation Working Group (1) and
approved by the Executive Committee of the European
Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation 2001;48:207—9.
12. Cummins RO, Eisenberg M, Bergner L, Murray JA. Sensitivity
accuracy, and safety of an automatic external defibrillator.
Lancet 1984;2:318—20.
13. Davis EA, Mosesso Jr VN. Performance of police first
responders in utilizing automated external defibrillation
on victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Prehosp Emerg Care
1998;2:101—7.
14. White RD, Vukov LF, Bugliosi TF. Early defibrillation by
police: initial experience with measurement of critical
time intervals and patient outcome. Ann Emerg Med
1994;23:1009—13.
15. White RD, Hankins DG, Bugliosi TF. Seven years’ experi-
ence with early defibrillation by police and paramedics
in an emergency medical services system. Resuscitation
1998;39:145—51.
16. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299—304.
17. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac
arrest. JAMA 2005;293:305—10.
18. Kerber RE, Becker LB, Bourland JD, et al. Automatic exter-
nal defibrillators for public access defibrillation: recom-
mendations for specifying and reporting arrhythmia analy-
sis algorithm performance, incorporating new waveforms,
and enhancing safety. A statement for health professionals
from the American Heart Association Task Force on Auto-
matic External Defibrillation, Subcommittee on AED Safety
and Efficacy. Circulation 1997;95:1677—82.
19. Dickey W, Dalzell GW, Anderson JM, Adgey AA. The accu-
racy of decision-making of a semi-automatic defibrillator
during cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J 1992;13:608—15.
20. Atkinson E, Mikysa B, Conway JA, et al. Specificity and
sensitivity of automated external defibrillator rhythm anal-
C.D. Deakin, J.P. Nolan
ysis in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:185—
96.
21. Cecchin F, Jorgenson DB, Berul CI, et al. Is arrhythmia
detection by automatic external defibrillator accurate for
children? Sensitivity and specificity of an automatic exter-
nal defibrillator algorithm in 696 pediatric arrhythmias.
Circulation 2001;103:2483—8.
22. Zafari AM, Zarter SK, Heggen V, et al. A program encour-
aging early defibrillation results in improved in-hospital
resuscitation efficacy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:846—52.
23. Destro A, Marzaloni M, Sermasi S, Rossi F. Automatic exter-
nal defibrillators in the hospital as well? Resuscitation
1996;31:39—43.
24. Domanovits H, Meron G, Sterz F, et al. Successful automatic
external defibrillator operation by people trained only in
basic life support in a simulated cardiac arrest situation.
Resuscitation 1998;39:47—50.
25. Cusnir H, Tongia R, Sheka KP, et al. In hospital cardiac
arrest: a role for automatic defibrillation. Resuscitation
2004;63:183—8.
26. Kaye W, Mancini ME, Richards N. Organizing and imple-
menting a hospital-wide first-responder automated exter-
nal defibrillation program: strengthening the in-hospital
chain of survival. Resuscitation 1995;30:151—6.
27. Miller PH. Potential fire hazard in defibrillation. JAMA
1972;221:192.
28. Hummel IIIrd RS, Ornato JP, Weinberg SM, Clarke AM. Spark-
generating properties of electrode gels used during defib-
rillation. A potential fire hazard. JAMA 1988;260:3021—4.
29. Fires from defibrillation during oxygen administration.
Health Devices 1994;23:307—9.
30. Lefever J, Smith A. Risk of fire when using defibrillation in
an oxygen enriched atmosphere. Medical Devices Agency
Safety Notices 1995;3:1—3.
31. Ward ME. Risk of fires when using defibrillators in an oxygen
enriched atmosphere. Resuscitation 1996;31:173.
32. Theodorou AA, Gutierrez JA, Berg RA. Fire attributable
to a defibrillation attempt in a neonate. Pediatrics
2003;112:677—9.
33. Kerber RE, Kouba C, Martins J, et al. Advance prediction of
transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and car-
dioversion: importance of impedance in determining the
success of low-energy shocks. Circulation 1984;70:303—8.
34. Kerber RE, Grayzel J, Hoyt R, Marcus M, Kennedy J.
Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence
of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size
and paddle contact pressure. Circulation 1981;63:676—
82.
35. Sado DM, Deakin CD, Petley GW, Clewlow F. Comparison
of the effects of removal of chest hair with not doing so
before external defibrillation on transthoracic impedance.
Am J Cardiol 2004;93:98—100.
36. Deakin CD, Sado DM, Petley GW, Clewlow F. Differen-
tial contribution of skin impedance and thoracic volume
to transthoracic impedance during external defibrillation.
Resuscitation 2004;60:171—4.
37. Deakin C, Sado D, Petley G, Clewlow F. Determining the
optimal paddle force for external defibrillation. Am J Car-
diol 2002;90:812—3.
38. Deakin C, Bennetts S, Petley G, Clewlow F. What is the opti-
mal paddle force for paediatric defibrillation? Resuscitation
2002;55:59.
39. Panacek EA, Munger MA, Rutherford WF, Gardner SF. Report
of nitropatch explosions complicating defibrillation. Am J
Emerg Med 1992;10:128—9.
40. Wrenn K. The hazards of defibrillation through nitroglycerin
patches. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1327—8.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
41. Pagan-Carlo LA, Spencer KT, Robertson CE, Dengler A, Bir-
kett C, Kerber RE. Transthoracic defibrillation: importance
of avoiding electrode placement directly on the female
breast. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:449—52.
42. Deakin CD, Sado DM, Petley GW, Clewlow F. Is the ori-
entation of the apical defibrillation paddle of impor-
tance during manual external defibrillation? Resuscitation
2003;56:15—8.
43. Kirchhof P, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G. Effect of electrode
position on the outcome of cardioversion. Card Electro-
physiol Rev 2003;7:292—6.
44. Kirchhof P, Eckardt L, Loh P, et al. Anterior-posterior ver-
sus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external car-
dioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial. Lancet
2002;360:1275—9.
45. Botto GL, Politi A, Bonini W, Broffoni T, Bonatti R. Exter-
nal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: role of paddle posi-
tion on technical efficacy and energy requirements. Heart
1999;82:726—30.
46. Alp NJ, Rahman S, Bell JA, Shahi M. Randomised comparison
of antero-lateral versus antero-posterior paddle positions
for DC cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. Int J
Cardiol 2000;75:211—6.
47. Mathew TP, Moore A, McIntyre M, et al. Randomised com-
parison of electrode positions for cardioversion of atrial
fibrillation. Heart 1999;81:576—9.
48. Walsh SJ, McCarty D, McClelland AJ, et al. Impedance com-
pensated biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardiover-
sion of atrial fibrillation: a multi-centre comparison of
antero-apical and antero-posterior pad positions. Eur Heart
J 2005.
49. Deakin CD, McLaren RM, Petley GW, Clewlow F, Dalrymple-
Hay MJ. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on
transthoracic impedance—–implications for defibrillation.
Resuscitation 1998;37:9—12.
50. American National Standard: Automatic External Defibril-
lators and Remote Controlled Defibrillators (DF39). Arling-
ton, Virgina: Association for the Advancement of Medical
Instrumentation; 1993.
51. Deakin CD, McLaren RM, Petley GW, Clewlow F, Dalrymple-
Hay MJ. A comparison of transthoracic impedance using
standard defibrillation paddles and self-adhesive defibril-
lation pads. Resuscitation 1998;39:43—6.
52. Stults KR, Brown DD, Cooley F, Kerber RE. Self-adhesive
monitor/defibrillation pads improve prehospital defibrilla-
tion success. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:872—7.
53. Kerber RE, Martins JB, Kelly KJ, et al. Self-adhesive preap-
plied electrode pads for defibrillation and cardioversion. J
Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:815—20.
54. Kerber RE, Martins JB, Ferguson DW, et al. Exper-
imental evaluation and initial clinical application of
new self-adhesive defibrillation electrodes. Int J Cardiol
1985;8:57—66.
55. Perkins GD, Roberts C, Gao F. Delays in defibrillation: influ-
ence of different monitoring techniques. Br J Anaesth
2002;89:405—8.
56. Bradbury N, Hyde D, Nolan J. Reliability of ECG monitor-
ing with a gel pad/paddle combination after defibrillation.
Resuscitation 2000;44:203—6.
57. Chamberlain D. Gel pads should not be used for monitoring
ECG after defibrillation. Resuscitation 2000;43:159—60.
58. Callaway CW, Sherman LD, Mosesso Jr VN, Dietrich TJ, Holt
E, Clarkson MC. Scaling exponent predicts defibrillation
success for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac
arrest. Circulation 2001;103:1656—61.
59. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Aase SO, Husoy JH, Steen PA. Predict-
ing outcome of defibrillation by spectral characterization
S35
and nonparametric classification of ventricular fibrillation
in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation
2000;102:1523—9.
60. Eftestol T, Wik L, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of cardiopul-
monary resuscitation on predictors of ventricular fibrilla-
tion defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Circulation 2004;110:10—5.
61. Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Dennis D, Ray R, Hallstrom AP, Copass
MK. Amplitude of ventricular fibrillation waveform and out-
come after cardiac arrest. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:53—5.
62. Brown CG, Dzwonczyk R. Signal analysis of the human elec-
trocardiogram during ventricular fibrillation: frequency
and amplitude parameters as predictors of successful coun-
tershock. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:184—8.
63. Callaham M, Braun O, Valentine W, Clark DM, Zegans C. Pre-
hospital cardiac arrest treated by urban first-responders:
profile of patient response and prediction of outcome
by ventricular fibrillation waveform. Ann Emerg Med
1993;22:1664—77.
64. Strohmenger HU, Lindner KH, Brown CG. Analysis of
the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal amplitude and fre-
quency parameters as predictors of countershock success
in humans. Chest 1997;111:584—9.
65. Strohmenger HU, Eftestol T, Sunde K, et al. The predictive
value of ventricular fibrillation electrocardiogram signal
frequency and amplitude variables in patients with out-
of-hospital cardiac arrest. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1428—33.
66. Podbregar M, Kovacic M, Podbregar-Mars A, Brezocnik M.
Predicting defibrillation success by ‘genetic’ programming
in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscita-
tion 2003;57:153—9.
67. Menegazzi JJ, Callaway CW, Sherman LD, et al. Ventricular
fibrillation scaling exponent can guide timing of defibrilla-
tion and other therapies. Circulation 2004;109:926—31.
68. Povoas HP, Weil MH, Tang W, Bisera J, Klouche K, Barbatsis
A. Predicting the success of defibrillation by electrocardio-
graphic analysis. Resuscitation 2002;53:77—82.
69. Noc M, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Pernat A, Bisera J. Electro-
cardiographic prediction of the success of cardiac resusci-
tation. Crit Care Med 1999;27:708—14.
70. Strohmenger HU, Lindner KH, Keller A, Lindner IM, Pfen-
ninger EG. Spectral analysis of ventricular fibrillation and
closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation
1996;33:155—61.
71. Noc M, Weil MH, Gazmuri RJ, Sun S, Biscera J, Tang W.
Ventricular fibrillation voltage as a monitor of the effec-
tiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Lab Clin Med
1994;124:421—6.
72. Lightfoot CB, Nremt P, Callaway CW, et al. Dynamic nature
of electrocardiographic waveform predicts rescue shock
outcome in porcine ventricular fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med
2003;42:230—41.
73. Marn-Pernat A, Weil MH, Tang W, Pernat A, Bisera J. Opti-
mizing timing of ventricular defibrillation. Crit Care Med
2001;29:2360—5.
74. Hamprecht FA, Achleitner U, Krismer AC, et al. Fibrilla-
tion power, an alternative method of ECG spectral analysis
for prediction of countershock success in a porcine model
of ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2001;50:287—
96.
75. Amann A, Achleitner U, Antretter H, et al. Analysing ven-
tricular fibrillation ECG-signals and predicting defibrillation
success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation employing
N(alpha)-histograms. Resuscitation 2001;50:77—85.
76. Brown CG, Griffith RF, Van Ligten P, et al. Median
frequency—–a new parameter for predicting defibrillation
success rate. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:787—9.
S36
77. Amann A, Rheinberger K, Achleitner U, et al. The predic-
tion of defibrillation outcome using a new combination of
mean frequency and amplitude in porcine models of car-
diac arrest. Anesth Analg 2002;95:716—22.
78. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Walsh TR, et al. Influence
of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in
patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. JAMA
1999;281:1182—8.
79. Wik L, Hansen TB, Fylling F, et al. Delaying defibrillation to
give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with
out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial.
JAMA 2003;289:1389—95.
80. Jacobs IG, Finn JC, Oxer HF, Jelinek GA. CPR before defibril-
lation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial.
Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:39—45.
81. Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Ewy GA. Precountershock
cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves ventricular fibril-
lation median frequency and myocardial readiness for suc-
cessful defibrillation from prolonged ventricular fibrilla-
tion: a randomized, controlled swine study. Ann Emerg Med
2002;40:563—70.
82. Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Ewy GA, Kern KB. Precountershock
cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves initial response
to defibrillation from prolonged ventricular fibrillation:
a randomized, controlled swine study. Crit Care Med
2004;32:1352—7.
83. Kolarova J, Ayoub IM, Yi Z, Gazmuri RJ. Optimal timing for
electrical defibrillation after prolonged untreated ventric-
ular fibrillation. Crit Care Med 2003;31:2022—8.
84. Berg RA, Sanders AB, Kern KB, et al. Adverse hemo-
dynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for
rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Circulation
2001;104:2465—70.
85. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA.
Importance of continuous chest compressions during
cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome dur-
ing a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation
2002;105:645—9.
86. Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, et al. Adverse outcomes of inter-
rupted precordial compression during automated defibril-
lation. Circulation 2002;106:368—72.
87. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of interrupting pre-
cordial compressions on the calculated probability of defib-
rillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cir-
culation 2002;105:2270—3.
88. Valenzuela TD, Kern KB, Clark LL, et al. Interruptions
of chest compressions during emergency medical systems
resuscitation. Circulation 2005;112:1259—65.
89. van Alem AP, Sanou BT, Koster RW. Interruption of car-
diopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated
external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann
Emerg Med 2003;42:449—57.
90. Bain AC, Swerdlow CD, Love CJ, et al. Multicenter study
of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.
Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:5—12.
91. Poole JE, White RD, Kanz KG, et al. Low-energy impedance-
compensating biphasic waveforms terminate ventricular
fibrillation at high rates in victims of out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest. LIFE Investigators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
1997;8:1373—85.
92. Schneider T, Martens PR, Paschen H, et al. Multicenter,
randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks com-
pared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resusci-
tation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized
Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators. Circula-
tion 2000;102:1780—7.
C.D. Deakin, J.P. Nolan
93. Rea TD, Shah S, Kudenchuk PJ, Copass MK, Cobb LA. Auto-
mated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algo-
rithm delay CPR? Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:132—41.
94. Hess EP, White RD. Ventricular fibrillation is not pro-
voked by chest compression during post-shock organized
rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2005;66:7—11.
95. Joglar JA, Kessler DJ, Welch PJ, et al. Effects of repeated
electrical defibrillations on cardiac troponin I levels. Am J
Cardiol 1999;83:270—2. A6.
96. van Alem AP, Chapman FW, Lank P, Hart AA, Koster
RW. A prospective, randomised and blinded compari-
son of first shock success of monophasic and biphasic
waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2003;58:17—24.
97. Carpenter J, Rea TD, Murray JA, Kudenchuk PJ, Eisenberg
MS. Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-
of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Resusci-
tation 2003;59:189—96.
98. Morrison LJ, Dorian P, Long J, et al. Out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine
defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support inter-
vention trial (ORBIT). Resuscitation 2005;66:149—57.
99. Kerber RE, Martins JB, Kienzle MG, et al. Energy, current,
and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical
studies using an automated impedance-based method of
energy adjustment. Circulation 1988;77:1038—46.
100. Koster RW, Dorian P, Chapman FW, Schmitt PW, O’Grady
SG, Walker RG. A randomized trial comparing monophasic
and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of
atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2004;147:e20.
101. Martens PR, Russell JK, Wolcke B, et al. Optimal Response
to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects.
Resuscitation 2001;49:233—43.
102. Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Hallstrom AP. Ventricu-
lar defibrillation: a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J
shocks. N Engl J Med 1982;307:1101—6.
103. Tang W, Weil MH, Sun S, et al. The effects of
biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on
postresuscitation myocardial function. J Am Coll Cardiol
1999;34:815—22.
104. Gliner BE, Jorgenson DB, Poole JE, et al. Treatment of out-
of-hospital cardiac arrest with a low-energy impedance-
compensating biphasic waveform automatic external defib-
rillator. The LIFE Investigators. Biomed Instrum Technol
1998;32:631—44.
105. White RD, Blackwell TH, Russell JK, Snyder DE, Jorgenson
DB. Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation,
resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic wave-
form defibrillator. Resuscitation 2005;64:63—9.
106. Kuisma M, Suominen P, Korpela R. Paediatric out-of-hospital
cardiac arrests: epidemiology and outcome. Resuscitation
1995;30:141—50.
107. Sirbaugh PE, Pepe PE, Shook JE, et al. A prospective,
population-based study of the demographics, epidemi-
ology, management, and outcome of out-of-hospital
pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. Ann Emerg Med
1999;33:174—84.
108. Hickey RW, Cohen DM, Strausbaugh S, Dietrich AM. Pedi-
atric patients requiring CPR in the prehospital setting. Ann
Emerg Med 1995;25:495—501.
109. Appleton GO, Cummins RO, Larson MP, Graves JR. CPR and
the single rescuer: at what age should you ‘‘call first’’
rather than ‘‘call fast’’? Ann Emerg Med 1995;25:492—4.
110. Ronco R, King W, Donley DK, Tilden SJ. Outcome and cost
at a children’s hospital following resuscitation for out-of-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
1995;149:210—4.
111. Losek JD, Hennes H, Glaeser P, Hendley G, Nelson DB.
Prehospital care of the pulseless, nonbreathing pediatric
patient. Am J Emerg Med 1987;5:370—4.
112. Mogayzel C, Quan L, Graves JR, Tiedeman D, Fahrenbruch
C, Herndon P. Out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in chil-
dren and adolescents: causes and outcomes. Ann Emerg
Med 1995;25:484—91.
113. Safranek DJ, Eisenberg MS, Larsen MP. The epidemiol-
ogy of cardiac arrest in young adults. Ann Emerg Med
1992;21:1102—6.
114. Berg RA, Chapman FW, Berg MD, et al. Attenuated adult
biphasic shocks compared with weight-based monophasic
shocks in a swine model of prolonged pediatric ventricular
fibrillation. Resuscitation 2004;61:189—97.
115. Tang W, Weil MH, Jorgenson D, et al. Fixed-energy bipha-
sic waveform defibrillation in a pediatric model of cardiac
arrest and resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2736—41.
116. Clark CB, Zhang Y, Davies LR, Karlsson G, Kerber RE. Pedi-
atric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monopha-
sic waveforms in an experimental model. Resuscitation
2001;51:159—63.
117. Gurnett CA, Atkins DL. Successful use of a biphasic wave-
form automated external defibrillator in a high-risk child.
Am J Cardiol 2000;86:1051—3.
118. Atkins DL, Jorgenson DB. Attenuated pediatric electrode
pads for automated external defibrillator use in children.
Resuscitation 2005;66:31—7.
119. Gutgesell HP, Tacker WA, Geddes LA, Davis S, Lie JT, McNa-
mara DG. Energy dose for ventricular defibrillation of chil-
dren. Pediatrics 1976;58:898—901.
120. Cummins RO, Austin Jr D. The frequency of ‘occult’ ventric-
ular fibrillation masquerading as a flat line in prehospital
cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:813—7.
121. Losek JD, Hennes H, Glaeser PW, Smith DS, Hendley G. Pre-
hospital countershock treatment of pediatric asystole. Am
J Emerg Med 1989;7:571—5.
122. Martin DR, Gavin T, Bianco J, et al. Initial countershock in
the treatment of asystole. Resuscitation 1993;26:63—8.
123. Kohl P, King AM, Boulin C. Antiarrhythmic effects of acute
mechanical stiumulation. In: Kohl P, Sachs F, Franz MR, edi-
tors. Cardiac mechano-electric feedback and arrhythmias:
form pipette to patient. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;
2005. p. 304—14.
124. Befeler B. Mechanical stimulation of the heart; its thera-
peutic value in tachyarrhythmias. Chest 1978;73:832—8.
125. Volkmann HKA, Kühnert H, Paliege R, Dannberg G,
Siegert K. Terminierung von Kammertachykardien durch
mechanische Herzstimulation mit Präkordialschlägen.
(‘‘Termination of Ventricular Tachycardias by Mechan-
ical Cardiac Pacing by Means of Precordial Thumps’’).
Zeitschrift für Kardiologie 1990;79:717—24.
126. Caldwell G, Millar G, Quinn E. Simple mechanical meth-
ods for cardioversion: Defence of the precordial thump and
cough version. Br Med J 1985;291:627—30.
127. Morgera T, Baldi N, Chersevani D, Medugno G, Camerini F.
Chest thump and ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Elec-
trophysiol 1979;2:69—75.
128. Rahner E, Zeh E. Die Regularisierung von Kammertachykar-
dien durch präkordialen Faustschlag. (‘‘The Regulariza-
tion of Ventricular Tachycardias by Precordial Thumping’’).
Medizinsche Welt 1978;29:1659—63.
S37
129. Gertsch M, Hottinger S, Hess T. Serial chest thumps for the
treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coro-
nary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 1992;15:181—8.
130. Krijne R. Rate acceleration of ventricular tachycardia after
a precordial chest thump. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:964—5.
131. Sclarovsky S, Kracoff OH, Agmon J. Acceleration of ven-
tricular tachycardia induced by a chest thump. Chest
1981;80:596—9.
132. Yakaitis RW, Redding JS. Precordial thumping during cardiac
resuscitation. Crit Care Med 1973;1:22—6.
133. Lown B. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br
Heart J 1967;29:469—89.
134. Mittal S, Ayati S, Stein KM, et al. Transthoracic cardiover-
sion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic
versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks. Circulation
2000;101:1282—7.
135. Page RL, Kerber RE, Russell JK, et al. Biphasic versus
monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibril-
lation: the results of an international randomized, double-
blind multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1956—63.
136. Joglar JA, Hamdan MH, Ramaswamy K, et al. Initial energy
for elective external cardioversion of persistent atrial fib-
rillation. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:348—50.
137. Alatawi F, Gurevitz O, White R. Prospective, randomized
comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and
safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fib-
rillation. Heart Rhythm 2005;2:382—7.
138. Pinski SL, Sgarbossa EB, Ching E, Trohman RG. A comparison
of 50-J versus 100-J shocks for direct-current cardioversion
of atrial flutter. Am Heart J 1999;137:439—42.
139. Kerber RE, Kienzle MG, Olshansky B, et al. Ventricular
tachycardia rate and morphology determine energy and
current requirements for transthoracic cardioversion. Cir-
culation 1992;85:158—63.
140. Hedges JR, Syverud SA, Dalsey WC, Feero S, Easter R, Shultz
B. Prehospital trial of emergency transcutaneous cardiac
pacing. Circulation 1987;76:1337—43.
141. Barthell E, Troiano P, Olson D, Stueven HA, Hendley G. Pre-
hospital external cardiac pacing: a prospective, controlled
clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:1221—6.
142. Cummins RO, Graves JR, Larsen MP, et al. Out-of-hospital
transcutaneous pacing by emergency medical technicians
in patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med
1993;328:1377—82.
143. Ornato JP, Peberdy MA. The mystery of bradyasystole
during cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:576—
87.
144. Niemann JT, Adomian GE, Garner D, Rosborough JP. Endo-
cardial and transcutaneous cardiac pacing, calcium chlo-
ride, and epinephrine in postcountershock asystole and
bradycardias. Crit Care Med 1985;13:699—704.
145. Quan L, Graves JR, Kinder DR, Horan S, Cummins RO.
Transcutaneous cardiac pacing in the treatment of out-
of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrests. Ann Emerg Med
1992;21:905—9.
146. Dalsey WC, Syverud SA, Hedges JR. Emergency department
use of transcutaneous pacing for cardiac arrests. Crit Care
Med 1985;13:399—401.
147. Knowlton AA, Falk RH. External cardiac pacing during in-
hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:1295—8.
148. Ornato JP, Carveth WL, Windle JR. Pacemaker insertion for
prehospital bradyasystolic cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med
1984;13:101—3.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S39—S86
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 4. Adult advanced life support
Jerry P. Nolan, Charles D. Deakin, Jasmeet Soar,
Bernd W. Böttiger, Gary Smith
4a. Prevention of in-hospital cardiac
arrest
The problem
This new section of the guidelines stresses the
importance of preventing in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Fewer than 20% of patients suffering an in-hospital
cardiac arrest will survive to go home.1,2 Most sur-
vivors have a witnessed and monitored VF arrest,
primary myocardial ischaemia as the cause, and
receive immediate defibrillation.
Cardiac arrest in patients in unmonitored ward
areas is not usually a sudden unpredictable event,
nor is it usually caused by primary cardiac disease.
These patients often have slow and progressive
physiological deterioration, involving hypoxia and
hypotension, that is unnoticed by staff, or is recog-
nised but poorly treated.3,4 The underlying cardiac
arrest rhythm in this group is usually non-shockable
and survival to hospital discharge is very poor.1,5
The records of patients who have a cardiac
arrest or unanticipated intensive care unit (ICU)
admission often contain evidence of unrecog-
nised, or untreated, breathing and circulation
problems.3,4,6—8 The ACADEMIA study showed
E-mail address: jerry.nolan@ukgateway.net (J.P. Nolan).
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.009
antecedents in 79% of cardiac arrests, 55% of deaths
and 54% of unanticipated ICU admissions.4 Early and
effective treatment of seriously ill patients might
prevent some cardiac arrests, deaths and unantici-
pated ICU admissions. A third of patients who have
a false cardiac arrest call die subsequently.9
Nature of the deficiencies in acute care
These often involve simple aspects of care includ-
ing: the failure to treat abnormalities of the
patient’s airway, breathing and circulation, incor-
rect use of oxygen therapy, failure to monitor
patients, failure to involve experienced senior
staff, poor communication, lack of teamwork and
insufficient use of treatment limitation plans.3,7
Several studies show that medical and nurs-
ing staff lack knowledge and skills in acute care.
For example, trainee doctors may lack knowl-
edge about oxygen therapy,10 fluid and electrolyte
balance,11 analgesia,12 issues of consent,13 pulse
oximetry14 and drug doses.15 Medical students
may be unable to recognise abnormal breathing
patterns.16 Medical school training provides poor
preparation for doctors’ early careers, and fails to
teach them the essential aspects of applied physi-
ology and acute care.17 There is also little to sug-
gest that the acute care training and knowledge of
S40
senior medical staff is better.18,19 Staff often lack
confidence when dealing with acute care problems,
and rarely use a systematic approach to the assess-
ment of critically ill patients.20
Recognising the critically ill patient
In general, the clinical signs of acute illness are
similar whatever the underlying process, as they
reflect failing respiratory, cardiovascular and neu-
rological systems. Abnormal physiology is com-
mon on general wards,21 yet the measurement
and recording of important physiological observa-
tions of sick patients occurs less frequently than
is desirable.3,4,8 This is surprising, as respiratory
rate abnormalities may predict cardiorespiratory
arrest.22 To assist in the early detection of criti-
cal illness, many hospitals now use early warning
scores (EWS) or calling criteria.23—25 Early warning
scoring systems allocate points to routine vital signs
measurements on the basis of their derangement
from an arbitrarily agreed ‘normal’ range.23—25 The
weighted score of one or more vital sign observa-
tions, or the total EWS, may be used to suggest
increasing the frequency of vital signs monitoring to
nurses, or to call ward doctors or critical care out-
reach teams to the patient. Alternatively, systems
incorporating ‘calling criteria’ are based on rou-
tine observations, which activate a response when
one or more variables reach an extremely abnormal
value.23,26 There are no data to establish the supe-
riority of one system over another, but it may be
preferable to use an EWS system, which can track
changes in physiology and warn of impending physi-
ological collapse, rather than the ‘‘calling criteria’’
approach, which is triggered only when an extreme
value of physiology has been reached.
There is a clinical rationale to the use of EWS
or calling criteria systems to identify sick patients
early. However, their sensitivity, specificity and
accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes has yet to
be validated convincingly.27,28 Several studies have
identified abnormalities of heart rate, blood pres-
sure, respiratory rate and conscious level as mark-
ers of impending critical events.22,23,29 The sugges-
tion that their incidence has predictive value must
be questioned, as not all important vital signs are,
or can be, recorded continuously in general ward
areas. Several studies show that charting of vital
signs is poor, with gaps in data recording.3,4,8,30
Although the use of physiological systems can
increase the frequency of vital signs monitoring,31
they will be useful for outcome prediction only
if widespread monitoring of hospitalised patients
becomes available. Even when medical staff are
J.P. Nolan et al.
alerted to a patient’s abnormal physiology, there
is often delay in attending the patient or referring
to higher levels of care.3,4,7 Whereas the use of a
warning score based on physiological abnormalities
is attractive, it is possible that a more subjective
approach, based on staff experience and expertise,
may also be effective.32
Response to critical illness
The traditional response to cardiac arrest is a
reactive one in which hospital staff (‘the cardiac
arrest team’) attend the patient after the cardiac
arrest has occurred. Cardiac arrest teams appear
to improve survival after cardiac arrest in circum-
stances where no team has previously existed.33
However, the role of the cardiac arrest team has
been questioned. In one study, only patients who
had return of spontaneous circulation before the
cardiac arrest team arrived were discharged from
hospital alive.34 When combined with the poor
survival rate after in-hospital cardiac arrest, this
emphasises the importance of early recognition and
treatment of critically ill patients to prevent car-
diac arrest. The name ‘cardiac arrest team’ implies
that the team will be called only after cardiac
arrest has occurred.
In some hospitals the cardiac arrest team has
been replaced by a medical emergency team (MET)
that responds, not only to patients in cardiac
arrest, but also to those with acute physiological
deterioration.26 The MET usually comprises medical
and nursing staff from intensive care and general
medicine. and responds to specific calling crite-
ria. Any member of the healthcare team can ini-
tiate a MET call. Early involvement of the MET
may reduce cardiac arrests, deaths and unantic-
ipated ICU admissions.35,36 The MET may also be
useful in detecting medical error, improving treat-
ment limitation decisions and reducing postoper-
ative ward deaths.37,38 MET interventions often
involve simple tasks such as starting oxygen ther-
apy and intravenous fluids.39 A circadian pattern of
MET activation has been reported, which may sug-
gest that systems for identifying and responding to
medical emergencies may not be uniform through-
out the 24-h period.40 Studying the effect of the
MET on patient outcomes is difficult. Many of the
study findings to date can be criticised because
of poor study design. A recent, well-designed,
cluster-randomised controlled trial of the MET sys-
tem demonstrated that the introduction of a MET
increased the calling incidence for the team. How-
ever, it failed to show a reduction in the incidence
of cardiac arrest, unexpected death or unplanned
ICU admission.41
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
In the UK, a system of pre-emptive ward
care, based predominantly on individual or teams
of nurses known as critical care outreach, has
developed.42 Outreach services exist in many
forms, ranging from a single nurse to a 24-h, 7 days
per week multiprofessional team. An outreach team
or system may reduce ward deaths, postoperative
adverse events, ICU admissions and readmissions,
and increase survival.43—45
Other attempts to improve the general ward
care of patients and prevent physiological deteri-
oration and cardiac arrest include new admission
processes, early physiological monitoring and clini-
cal intervention in the emergency department (ED),
and the appointment of new grades of emergency
physicians. Many of these models attempt to sup-
port the primary admitting team with the skills
of ‘resuscitation’ specialists.46 Medical and surgi-
cal assessment units act as a single location for all
acute admissions until their required level of care
is evaluated. Patients are monitored and observed
for periods of up to 72 h, and there is usually
rapid access to senior medical staff, diagnostics and
urgent treatment.47 The single location provides a
central focus for on-call medical, nursing and phys-
iotherapy staff, in contrast to the traditional system
in which staff and patients are dispersed through-
out the hospital.
Many acutely ill patients present to hospital via
the ED and are obviously in need of immediate
ICU-type interventions. Early goal-directed therapy
in the ED reverses physiological derangement and
appears to improve patient survival.48
Appropriate placement of patients
Ideally, the sickest patients should be admitted
to an area that can provide the greatest super-
vision and the highest level of organ support and
nursing care. This often occurs, but some patients
are placed incorrectly.49 International organisa-
tions have offered definitions of levels of care and
produced admission and discharge criteria for high
dependency units (HDUs) and ICUs.50,51
Staffing levels
Hospital staffing tends to be at its lowest during the
night and at weekends. This may influence patient
monitoring, treatment and outcomes. Admission to
a general medical ward after 17:00 h52 or to hos-
pital at weekends53 is associated with increased
mortality. Patients who are discharged from ICUs
to general wards at night have an increased risk of
in-hospital death compared with those discharged
during the day and those discharged to HDUs.54 One
S41
study shows that higher nurse staffing is associated
with reduction in cardiac arrest rates, as well as
rates of pneumonia, shock and death.55
Resuscitation decisions
Consider ‘do not attempt resuscitation’ (DNAR)
when the patient:
• does not wish to have CPR
• will not survive cardiac arrest even if CPR is
attempted
Hospital staff often fail to consider whether
resuscitation attempts are appropriate and resus-
citation attempts in futile cases are common.37
Even when there is clear evidence that cardiac
arrest or death is likely, ward staff rarely make
decisions about the patient’s resuscitation status.4
Many European countries have no formal policy for
recording DNAR decisions and the practice of con-
sulting patients about the decision is variable.56
Improved knowledge, training and DNAR decision-
making should improve patient care and prevent
futile CPR attempts (see Section 8).
Guidelines for prevention of in-hospital
cardiac arrest
The following strategies may prevent avoidable in-
hospital cardiac arrests.
1. Provide care for patients who are critically ill
or at risk of clinical deterioration in appropriate
areas, with the level of care provided matched
to the level of patient sickness.
2. Critically ill patients need regular observations:
match the frequency and type of observations to
the severity of illness or the likelihood of clinical
deterioration and cardiopulmonary arrest. Often
only simple vital sign observations (pulse, blood
pressure, respiratory rate) are needed.
3. Use an EWS system to identify patients who are
critically ill and or at risk of clinical deteriora-
tion and cardiopulmonary arrest.
4. Use a patient charting system that enables the
regular measurement and recording of EWS.
5. Have a clear and specific policy that requires
a clinical response to EWS systems. This should
include advice on the further clinical manage-
ment of the patient and the specific responsibil-
ities of medical and nursing staff.
6. The hospital should have a clearly identified
response to critical illness. This may include
a designated outreach service or resuscitation
team (e.g. MET) capable of responding to acute
clinical crises identified by clinical triggers or
S42
other indicators. This service must be available
24 h per day.
7. Train all clinical staff in the recognition, mon-
itoring and management of the critically ill
patient. Include advice on clinical management
while awaiting the arrival of more experienced
staff.
8. Identify patients for whom cardiopulmonary
arrest is an anticipated terminal event and in
whom CPR is inappropriate, and patients who
do not wish to be treated with CPR. Hospitals
should have a DNAR policy, based on national
guidance, which is understood by all clinical
staff.
9. Ensure accurate audit of cardiac arrest, ‘false
arrest’, unexpected deaths and unanticipated
ICU admissions using common datasets. Audit
also the antecedents and clinical response to
these events.
4b. In-hospital resuscitation
After in-hospital cardiac arrest, the division
between basic life support and advanced life sup-
port is arbitrary; in practice, the resuscitation pro-
cess is a continuum and is based on common sense.
The public expect that clinical staff can under-
take cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). For all
in-hospital cardiac arrests, ensure that:
• cardiorespiratory arrest is recognised immedi-
ately
• help is summoned using a standard telephone
number
• CPR is started immediately using airway
adjuncts, e.g. a pocket mask and, if indicated,
defibrillation attempted within 3 min
The exact sequence of actions after in-hospital
cardiac arrest will depend on many factors, includ-
ing:
• location (clinical/non-clinical area; moni-
tored/unmonitored area)
• training of the first responders
• number of responders
• equipment available
• hospital response system to cardiac arrest and
medical emergencies, (e.g. MET) cardiac arrest
team
Location
Patients who have monitored arrests are usu-
ally diagnosed rapidly. Ward patients may have
had a period of deterioration and an unwitnessed
arrest.3,4,6—8 Ideally, all patients who are at high
J.P. Nolan et al.
risk of cardiac arrest should be cared for in a mon-
itored area where facilities for immediate resusci-
tation are available.
Training of first responders
All healthcare professionals should be able to
recognise cardiac arrest, call for help and start CPR.
Staff should do what they have been trained to do.
For example, staff in critical care and emergency
medicine will have more advanced resuscitation
skills than staff who are not involved regularly in
resuscitation in their normal clinical role. Hospital
staff who attend a cardiac arrest may have differ-
ent levels of skill to manage the airway, breathing
and circulation. Rescuers must undertake the skills
in which they are trained and competent.
Number of responders
The single responder must ensure that help is com-
ing. If other staff are nearby, several actions can be
undertaken simultaneously.
Equipment available
All clinical areas should have immediate access
to resuscitation equipment and drugs to facilitate
rapid resuscitation of the patient in cardiopul-
monary arrest. Ideally, the equipment used for CPR
(including defibrillators) and the layout of equip-
ment and drugs should be standardised throughout
the hospital.57
Resuscitation team
The resuscitation team may take the form of a tra-
ditional cardiac arrest team, which is called only
when cardiac arrest is recognised. Alternatively,
hospitals may have strategies to recognise patients
at risk of cardiac arrest and summon a team (e.g.,
MET) before cardiac arrest occurs.35,36,39,41,58 The
term ‘resuscitation team’ reflects the range of
response teams. In hospital cardiac arrests are
rarely sudden or unexpected. A strategy of recog-
nising patients at risk of cardiac arrest may enable
some of these arrests to be prevented, or may pre-
vent futile resuscitation attempts in those who are
unlikely to benefit from CPR.
Immediate actions for a collapsed patient in
a hospital
An algorithm for the initial management of in-
hospital cardiac arrest is shown in Figure 4.1.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 4.1 Algorithm for the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest.
• Ensure personal safety.
• Check the victim for a response.
• When healthcare professionals see a patient col-
lapse or find a patient apparently unconscious in
a clinical area, they should first shout for help,
then assess if the patient is responsive. Gently
shake the shoulders and ask loudly: ‘‘Are you all
right?’’
• If other members of staff are nearby, it will be
possible to undertake actions simultaneously.
The responsive patient
Urgent medical assessment is required. Depending
on the local protocols, this may take the form of a
resuscitation team (e.g., MET). While awaiting this
team, give the patient oxygen, attach monitoring
and insert an intravenous cannula.
The unresponsive patient
The exact sequence will depend on the training
of staff and experience in assessment of breath-
ing and circulation. Trained healthcare staff cannot
assess the breathing and pulse sufficiently reliably
to confirm cardiac arrest.16,59,60 Agonal breathing
(occasional gasps, slow, laboured or noisy breath-
ing) is common in the early stages of cardiac arrest
and is a sign of cardiac arrest and should not be
confused as a sign of life/circulation.
• Shout for help (if not already)
Turn the victim on to his back and then open the
airway:
• Open Airway and check breathing:
S43
◦ Open the airway using a head tilt chin lift
◦ Look in the mouth. If a foreign body or debris
is visible attempt to remove with forceps or
suction as appropriate
◦ If you suspect that there may have been an
injury to the neck, try to open the airway using
a jaw thrust. Remember that maintaining an
airway and adequate ventilation is the overrid-
ing priority in managing a patient with a sus-
pected spinal injury. If this is unsuccessful, use
just enough head tilt to clear the airway. Use
manual in-line stabilisation to minimise head
movement if sufficient rescuers are available.
Keeping the airway open, look, listen, and feel
for normal breathing (an occasional gasp, slow,
laboured or noisy breathing is not normal):
• Look for chest movement
• Listen at the victim’s mouth for breath sounds
• Feel for air on your cheek
Look, listen, and feel for no more than 10 s to
determine if the victim is breathing normally
• Check for signs of a circulation:
◦ It may be difficult to be certain that there is no
pulse. If the patient has no signs of life (lack
of movement, normal breathing, or coughing),
start CPR until more experience help arrives or
the patient shows signs of life.
◦ Those experienced in clinical assessment
should assess the carotid pulse whilst simulta-
neously looking for signs of life for not more
than 10 s.
◦ If the patient appears to have no signs of life, or
if there is doubt, start CPR immediately. Delays
S44
in diagnosis of cardiac arrest and starting CPR
will adversely effect survival must be avoided.
If there is a pulse or signs of life, urgent medi-
cal assessment is required. Depending on the local
protocols, this may take the form of a resusci-
tation team. While awaiting this team, give the
patient oxygen, attach monitoring, and insert an
intravenous cannula.
If there is no breathing, but there is a pulse (res-
piratory arrest), ventilate the patient’s lungs and
check for a circulation every 10 breaths.
Starting in-hospital CPR
• One person starts CPR as others call the resusci-
tation team and collect the resuscitation equip-
ment and a defibrillator. If only one member
of staff is present, this will mean leaving the
patient.
• Give 30 chest compressions followed by 2 venti-
lations.
• Undertaking chest compressions properly is tir-
ing; try to change the person doing chest com-
pressions every 2 min.
• Maintain the airway and ventilate the lungs with
the most appropriate equipment immediately to
hand. A pocket mask, which may be supple-
mented with an oral airway, is usually readily
available. Alternatively, use a laryngeal mask air-
way (LMA) and self-inflating bag, or bag-mask,
according to local policy. Tracheal intubation
should be attempted only by those who are
trained, competent and experienced in this skill.
• Use an inspiratory time of 1 s and give enough
volume to produce a normal chest rise. Add sup-
plemental oxygen as soon as possible.
• Once the patient’s trachea has been intubated,
continue chest compressions uninterrupted
(except for defibrillation or pulse checks when
indicated), at a rate of 100 min−1 , and ventilate
the lungs at approximately 10 breaths min−1 .
Avoid hyperventilation.
• If there is no airway and ventilation equipment
available, give mouth-to-mouth ventilation. If
there are clinical reasons to avoid mouth-to-
mouth contact, or you are unwilling or unable
to do this, do chest compressions until help or
airway equipment arrives.
• When the defibrillator arrives, apply the pad-
dles to the patient and analyse the rhythm. If
self-adhesive defibrillation pads are available,
apply these without interrupting chest compres-
sions. Pause briefly to assess the heart rhythm. If
indicated, attempt either manual or automated
external defibrillation (AED).
J.P. Nolan et al.
• Recommence chest compressions immediately
after the defibrillation attempt. Minimise inter-
ruptions to chest compressions.
• Continue resuscitation until the resuscitation
team arrives or the patient shows signs of life.
Follow the voice prompts if using an AED. If using
a manual defibrillator, follow the universal algo-
rithm for advanced life support (Section 4c).
• Once resuscitation is underway, and if there are
sufficient staff present, prepare intravenous can-
nulae and drugs likely to be used by the resusci-
tation team (e.g. adrenaline).
• Identify one person to be responsible for han-
dover to the resuscitation team leader. Locate
the patient’s records.
• The quality of chest compressions during in-
hospital CPR is frequently sub-optimal.61,62 The
team leader should monitor the quality of CPR
and change CPR providers if the quality of CPR
is poor. The person providing chest compressions
should be changed every 2 min.
The monitored and witnessed cardiac arrest
If a patient has a monitored and witnessed cardiac
arrest, act as follows.
• Confirm cardiac arrest and shout for help.
• Consider a precordial thump if the rhythm is
VF/VT and a defibrillator is not immediately
available.
• If the initial rhythm is VF/VT and a defibrillator
is immediately available, give a shock first. The
use of adhesive electrode pads or a ‘quick-look’
paddles technique will enable rapid assessment
of heart rhythm compared with attaching ECG
electrodes.63
Training for healthcare professionals
The Immediate Life Support course trains health-
care professionals in the skills required to start
resuscitation, including defibrillation, and to be
members of a cardiac arrest team (see Section 9).64
The Advanced Life Support (ALS) course teaches the
skills required for leading a resuscitation team.65,66
4c. ALS treatment algorithm
Introduction
Heart rhythms associated with cardiac arrest are
divided into two groups: shockable rhythms (ven-
tricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycar-
dia (VF/VT)) and non-shockable rhythms (asystole
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 4.2 Advanced life support cardiac arrest algorithm.
and pulseless electrical activity (PEA)). The prin-
cipal difference in the management of these two
groups of arrhythmias is the need for attempted
defibrillation in those patients with VF/VT. Subse-
quent actions, including chest compressions, air-
way management and ventilation, venous access,
administration of adrenaline and the identification
and correction of reversible factors, are common to
both groups.
Although the ALS cardiac arrest algorithm
(Figure 4.2) is applicable to all cardiac arrests,
additional interventions may be indicated for car-
diac arrest caused by special circumstances (Sec-
tion 7).
The interventions that unquestionably con-
tribute to improved survival after cardiac arrest are
early defibrillation for VF/VT and prompt and effec-
tive bystander basic life support (BLS). Advanced
airway intervention and the delivery of drugs have
not been shown to increase survival to hospital
S45
discharge after cardiac arrest, although they are
still included among ALS interventions. Thus, during
advanced life support, attention must be focused
on early defibrillation and high-quality, uninter-
rupted BLS.
Shockable rhythms (ventricular
fibrillation/pulseless ventricular
tachycardia)
In adults, the commonest rhythm at the time of
cardiac arrest is VF, which may be preceded by a
period of VT or even supraventricular tachycardia
(SVT).67 Having confirmed cardiac arrest, summon
help (including the request for a defibrillator) and
start CPR, beginning with external chest compres-
sion, with a compression:ventilation (CV) ratio of
30:2. As soon as the defibrillator arrives, diagnose
the rhythm by applying paddles or self-adhesive
pads to the chest.
S46
If VF/VT is confirmed, charge the defibrillator
and give one shock (150—200-J biphasic or 360-
J monophasic). Without reassessing the rhythm or
feeling for a pulse, resume CPR (CV ratio 30:2)
immediately after the shock, starting with chest
compressions. Even if the defibrillation attempt is
successful in restoring a perfusing rhythm, it is very
rare for a pulse to be palpable immediately after
defibrillation,68 and the delay in trying to palpate
a pulse will further compromise the myocardium
if a perfusing rhythm has not been restored.69 If
a perfusing rhythm has been restored, giving chest
compressions does not increase the chance of VF
recurring.70 In the presence of post-shock asystole,
chest compressions may usefully induce VF.70 Con-
tinue CPR for 2 min, then pause briefly to check the
monitor: if there is still VF/VT, give a second shock
(150—360-J biphasic or 360-J monophasic). Resume
CPR immediately after the second shock.
Pause briefly after 2 min of CPR to check the
monitor: if there is still VF/VT, give adrenaline
followed immediately by a third shock (150—360-
J biphasic or 360-J monophasic) and resumption
of CPR (drug-shock-CPR-rhythm check sequence).
Minimise the delay between stopping chest com-
pressions and delivery of the shock. The adenaline
that is given immediately before the shock will be
circulated by the CPR that immediately follows the
shock. After drug delivery and 2 min of CPR, anal-
yse the rhythm and be prepared to deliver another
shock immediately if indicated. If VF/VT persists
after the third shock, give an intravenous bolus of
amiodarone 300 mg. Inject the amiodarone during
the brief rhythm analysis before delivery of the
fourth shock.
When the rhythm is checked 2 min after giving
a shock, if a nonshockable rhythm is present and
the rhythm is organised (complexes appear regular
or narrow), try to palpate a pulse. Rhythm checks
must be brief, and pulse checks undertaken only
if an organised rhythm is observed. If an organ-
ised rhythm is seen during a 2 min period of CPR,
do not interrupt chest compressions to palpate a
pulse unless the patient shows signs of life suggest-
ing ROSC. If there is any doubt about the presence
of a pulse in the presence of an organised rhythm,
resume CPR. If the patient has ROSC, begin postre-
suscitation care. If the patient’s rhythm changes
to asystole or PEA, see non-shockable rhythms
below.
During treatment of VF/VT, healthcare providers
must practice efficient coordination between CPR
and shock delivery. When VF is present for more
than a few minutes, the myocardium is depleted
of oxygen and metabolic substrates. A brief
period of chest compressions will deliver oxygen
J.P. Nolan et al.
and energy substrates and increase the probabil-
ity of restoring a perfusing rhythm after shock
delivery.71 Analyses of VF waveform character-
istics predictive of shock success indicate that
the shorter the time between chest compression
and shock delivery, the more likely the shock
will be successful.71,72 Reduction in the interval
from compression to shock delivery by even a
few seconds can increase the probability of shock
success.73
Regardless of the arrest rhythm, give adrenaline
1 mg every 3—5 min until ROSC is achieved; this
will be once every two loops of the algorithm. If
signs of life return during CPR (movement, normal
breathing, or coughing), check the monitor: if an
organised rhythm is present, check for a pulse. If a
pulse is palpable, continue post-resuscitation care
and/or treatment of peri-arrest arrhythmia. If no
pulse is present, continue CPR. Providing CPR with
a CV ratio of 30:2 is tiring; change the individual
undertaking compressions every 2 min.
Precordial thump
Consider giving a single precordial thump when car-
diac arrest is confirmed rapidly after a witnessed,
sudden collapse and a defibrillator is not immedi-
ately to hand (Section 3).74 These circumstances
are most likely to occur when the patient is mon-
itored. A precordial thump should be undertaken
immediately after confirmation of cardiac arrest
and only by healthcare professionals trained in
the technique. Using the ulnar edge of a tightly
clenched fist, deliver a sharp impact to the lower
half of the sternum from a height of about 20 cm,
then retract the fist immediately to create an
impulse-like stimulus. A precordial thump is most
likely to be successful in converting VT to sinus
rhythm. Successful treatment of VF by precor-
dial thump is much less likely: in all the reported
successful cases, the precordial thump was given
within the first 10 s of VF.75 There are very rare
reports of a precordial thump converting a perfus-
ing to a non-perfusing rhythm.76
Airway and ventilation
During the treatment of persistent VF, ensure good-
quality chest compressions between defibrillation
attempts. Consider reversible causes (4 H’s and 4
T’s) and, if identified, correct them. Check the
electrode/defibrillating paddle positions and con-
tacts, and the adequacy of the coupling medium,
e.g. gel pads. Tracheal intubation provides the
most reliable airway, but should be attempted
only if the healthcare provider is properly trained
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
and has adequate ongoing experience with the
technique. Personnel skilled in advanced airway
management should attempt laryngoscopy with-
out stopping chest compressions; a brief pause in
chest compressions may be required as the tube
is passed through the vocal cords. Alternatively, to
avoid any interruptions in chest compressions, the
intubation attempt may be deferred until return
of spontaneous circulation. No intubation attempt
should take longer than 30 s: if intubation has not
been achieved after this time, recommence bag-
mask ventilation. After intubation, confirm cor-
rect tube position and secure it adequately. Once
the patient’s trachea has been intubated, con-
tinue chest compressions, at a rate of 100 min−1 ,
without pausing during ventilation. Ventilate the
lungs at 10 breaths min−1 ; do not hyperventilate
the patient. A pause in the chest compressions
allows the coronary perfusion pressure to fall sub-
stantially. On resuming compressions there is some
delay before the original coronary perfusion pres-
sure is restored, thus chest compressions that are
not interrupted for ventilation result in a substan-
tially higher mean coronary perfusion pressure.
In the absence of personnel skilled in tracheal
intubation, acceptable alternatives are the Com-
bitube, laryngeal mask airway (LMA), ProSeal LMA,
or Laryngeal Tube (Section 4d). Once one of these
airways has been inserted, attempt to deliver con-
tinuous chest compressions, uninterrupted during
ventilation. If excessive gas leakage causes inade-
quate ventilation of the patient’s lungs, chest com-
pressions will have to be interrupted to enable ven-
tilation (using a CV ratio of 30:2).
During continuous chest compressions, ventilate
the lungs at 10 breaths min−1 .
Intravenous access and drugs
Peripheral versus central venous drug delivery.
Establish intravenous access if this has not already
been achieved. Although peak drug concentrations
are higher and circulation times are shorter when
drugs are injected into a central venous catheter
compared with a peripheral cannula,77 insertion of
a central venous catheter requires interruption of
CPR and is associated with several complications.
Peripheral venous cannulation is quicker, easier to
perform and safer. Drugs injected peripherally must
be followed by a flush of at least 20 ml of fluid and
elevation of the extremity for 10—20 s to facilitate
drug delivery to the central circulation.
Intraosseous route. If intravenous access is diffi-
cult or impossible, consider the intraosseous route.
Although normally considered as an alternative
S47
route for vascular access in children, it can also be
effective in adults.78 Intraosseous injection of drugs
achieves adequate plasma concentrations in a time
comparable with injection through a central venous
catheter. The intraosseous route also enables with-
drawal of marrow for venous blood gas analysis and
measurement of electrolytes and haemoglobin con-
centration.
Tracheal route. If neither intravenous nor
intraosseous access can be established, some
drugs can be given by the tracheal route. How-
ever, unpredictable plasma concentrations are
achieved when drugs are given via a tracheal tube,
and the optimal tracheal dose of most drugs is
unknown. During CPR, the equipotent dose of
adrenaline given via the trachea is three to ten
times higher than the intravenous dose.79,80 Some
animal studies suggest that the lower adrenaline
concentrations achieved when the drug is given via
the trachea may produce transient beta-adrenergic
effects, which will cause hypotension and lower
coronary artery perfusion pressure.81—84 If given
via the trachea, the dose of adrenaline is 3 mg
diluted to at least 10 ml with sterile water. Dilution
with water instead of 0.9% saline may achieve
better drug absorption.85 The solutions in prefilled
syringes are acceptable for this purpose.
Adrenaline. Despite the widespread use of
adrenaline during resuscitation, and several
studies involving vasopressin, there is no placebo-
controlled study that shows that the routine use of
any vasopressor at any stage during human cardiac
arrest increases survival to hospital discharge. Cur-
rent evidence is insufficient to support or refute
the routine use of any particular drug or sequence
of drugs. Despite the lack of human data, the use
of adrenaline is still recommended, based largely
on animal data. The alpha-adrenergic actions of
adrenaline cause vasoconstriction, which increases
myocardial and cerebral perfusion pressure. The
higher coronary blood flow increases the frequency
of the VF waveform and should improve the chance
of restoring a circulation when defibrillation is
attempted.86—88 The optimal duration of CPR and
number of shocks that should be given before
giving drugs is unknown. On the basis of expert
consensus, if VF/VT persists after two shocks,
give adrenaline and repeat every 3—5 min during
cardiac arrest. Do not interrupt CPR to give drugs.
Anti-arrhythmic drugs. There is no evidence that
giving any anti-arrhythmic drug routinely dur-
ing human cardiac arrest increases survival to
hospital discharge. In comparison with placebo89
and lidocaine,90 the use of amiodarone in shock-
S48
refractory VF improves the short-term outcome of
survival to hospital admission. In these studies,
the anti-arrhythmic therapy was given if VF/VT
persisted after at least three shocks; however,
these were delivered using the conventional three-
stacked shocks strategy. There are no data on the
use of amiodarone for shock-refractory VF/VT when
single shocks are used. On the basis of expert con-
sensus, if VF/VT persists after three shocks, give
300 mg amiodarone by bolus injection. A further
dose of 150 mg may be given for recurrent or refrac-
tory VF/VT, followed by an infusion of 900 mg over
24. Lidocaine 1 mg kg−1 may be used as an alterna-
tive if amiodarone is not available, but do not give
lidocaine if amiodarone has been given already.
Magnesium. Although the routine use of mag-
nesium in cardiac arrest does not increase
survival,91—95 give magnesium (8 mmol = 4 ml 50%
magnesium sulphate or 2 g) for refractory VF if
there is any suspicion of hypomagnesaemia (e.g.,
patients on potassium-losing diuretics).
Bicarbonate. Administering sodium bicarbonate
routinely during cardiac arrest and CPR (especially
in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests) or after return of
spontaneous circulation is not recommended. Give
sodium bicarbonate (50 mmol) if cardiac arrest is
associated with hyperkalaemia or tricyclic antide-
pressant overdose; repeat the dose according to the
clinical condition and result of repeated blood gas
analysis. Some experts give bicarbonate if the arte-
rial pH is less than 7.1, but this is controversial.
During cardiac arrest, arterial blood gas values do
not reflect the acid—base state of the tissues96 ; the
tissue pH will be lower than that in arterial blood.
Mixed venous blood values give a more accurate
estimate of the pH in the tissues,96 but it is rare
for a pulmonary artery catheter to be in situ at the
time of cardiac arrest. If a central venous catheter
is in situ, central venous blood gas analysis will pro-
vide a closer estimate of tissue acid/base state than
that provided by arterial blood.
Persistent ventricular fibrillation
In VF persists, consider changing the position of
the paddles (Section 3). Review all potentially
reversible causes (see below) and treat any that
are identified.
The duration of any individual resuscitation
attempt is a matter of clinical judgement, taking
into consideration the circumstances and the per-
ceived prospect of a successful outcome. If it was
considered appropriate to start resuscitation, it is
usually considered worthwhile continuing as long as
the patient remains in VF/VT.
J.P. Nolan et al.
Non-shockable rhythms (PEA and asystole)
Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is defined as
cardiac electrical activity in the absence of any
palpable pulses. These patients often have some
mechanical myocardial contractions, but these are
too weak to produce a detectable pulse or blood
pressure. PEA is often caused by reversible condi-
tions, and can be treated if those conditions are
identified and corrected (see below). Survival fol-
lowing cardiac arrest with asystole or PEA is unlikely
unless a reversible cause can be found and treated
effectively.
If the initial monitored rhythm is PEA or asys-
tole, start CPR 30:2 and give adrenaline 1 mg as
soon as intravascular access is achieved. If asystole
is displayed, check without stopping CPR that the
leads are attached correctly. Asystole is a condi-
tion that could be exacerbated or precipitated by
excessive vagal tone and, theoretically, this could
be reversed by a vagolytic drug; therefore, despite
the lack of evidence that routine atropine for asys-
tolic cardiac arrest increases survival, give atropine
3 mg (the dose that will provide maximum vagal
blockade) if there is asystole or the rhythm is slow
PEA (rate <60 min−1 ). Secure the airway as soon
as possible, to enable chest compressions to be
delivered without pausing during ventilation. After
2 min of CPR, recheck the rhythm. If no rhythm is
present (asystole), or if there is no change in the
ECG appearance, resume CPR immediately. If an
organised rhythm is present, attempt to palpate a
pulse. If no pulse is present (or if there is any doubt
about the presence of a pulse), continue CPR. If a
pulse is present, begin post-resuscitation care. If
signs of life return during CPR, check the rhythm
and attempt to palpate a pulse.
Whenever a diagnosis of asystole is made, check
the ECG carefully for the presence of P waves,
because this may respond to cardiac pacing. There
is no benefit in attempting to pace true asystole.
If there is doubt about whether the rhythm is
asystole or fine VF, do not attempt defibrillation;
instead, continue chest compressions and ventila-
tion. Fine VF that is difficult to distinguish from
asystole will not be shocked successfully into a per-
fusing rhythm. Continuing good-quality CPR may
improve the amplitude and frequency of the VF and
improve the chance of successful defibrillation to a
perfusing rhythm. Delivering repeated shocks in an
attempt to defibrillate what is thought to be fine VF
will increase myocardial injury, both directly from
the electricity and indirectly from the interruptions
in coronary blood flow.
During the treatment of asystole or PEA, if
the rhythm changes to VF, follow the left side of
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
the algorithm. Otherwise, continue CPR and give
adrenaline every 3—5 min (every other loop of the
algorithm).
Potentially reversible causes
Potential causes or aggravating factors for which
specific treatment exists must be considered during
any cardiac arrest. For ease of memory, these are
divided into two groups of four based upon their
initial letter: either H or T. More details on many of
these conditions are covered in Section 7.
The four Hs
Minimise the risk of hypoxia by ensuring that the
patient’s lungs are ventilated adequately with 100%
oxygen. Make sure there is adequate chest rise
and bilateral breath sounds. Using the techniques
described in Section 4d, check carefully that the
tracheal tube is not misplaced in a bronchus or the
oesophagus.
Pulseless electrical activity caused by hypo-
volaemia is due usually to severe haemorrhage.
This may be precipitated by trauma (Section 7i),
gastrointestinal bleeding or rupture of an aortic
aneurysm. Intravascular volume should be restored
rapidly with fluid, coupled with urgent surgery to
stop the haemorrhage.
Hyperkalaemia, hypokalaemia, hypocalcaemia,
acidaemia and other metabolic disorders are
detected by biochemical tests or suggested by the
patient’s medical history, e.g. renal failure (Sec-
tion 7a). A 12-lead ECG may be diagnostic. Intra-
venous calcium chloride is indicated in the pres-
ence of hyperkalaemia, hypocalcaemia and calcium
channel-blocker overdose.
Suspect hypothermia in any drowning incident
(Sections 7c and d); use a low-reading thermome-
ter.
The four Ts
A tension pneumothorax may be the primary cause
of PEA and may follow attempts at central venous
catheter insertion. The diagnosis is made clinically.
Decompress rapidly by needle thoracocentesis, and
then insert a chest drain.
Cardiac tamponade is difficult to diagnose
because the typical signs of distended neck veins
and hypotension are usually obscured by the
arrest itself. Cardiac arrest after penetrating chest
trauma is highly suggestive of tamponade and is an
indication for needle pericardiocentesis or resusci-
tative thoracotomy (see Section 7i).
S49
In the absence of a specific history, the acci-
dental or deliberate ingestion of therapeutic or
toxic substances may be revealed only by labora-
tory investigations (Section 7b). Where available,
the appropriate antidotes should be used, but most
often treatment is supportive.
The commonest cause of thromboembolic or
mechanical circulatory obstruction is massive pul-
monary embolus. If cardiac arrest is thought to be
caused by pulmonary embolism, consider giving a
thrombolytic drug immediately (Section 4e).97
4d. Airway management and ventilation
Introduction
Patients requiring resuscitation often have an
obstructed airway, usually secondary to loss of con-
sciousness, but occasionally it may be the primary
cause of cardiorespiratory arrest. Prompt assess-
ment, with control of the airway and ventilation of
the lungs, is essential. This will help to prevent sec-
ondary hypoxic damage to the brain and other vital
organs. Without adequate oxygenation it may be
impossible to restore a spontaneous cardiac output.
These principles may not apply to the witnessed pri-
mary cardiac arrest in the vicinity of a defibrillator;
in this case, the priority is immediate attempted
defibrillation.
Airway obstruction
Causes of airway obstruction
Obstruction of the airway may be partial or com-
plete. It may occur at any level, from the nose
and mouth down to the trachea (Figure 4.3). In
the unconscious patient, the commonest site of
airway obstruction is at the level of the pharynx.
Until recently this obstruction had been attributed
to posterior displacement of the tongue caused by
decreased muscle tone; with the tongue ultimately
touching the posterior pharyngeal wall. The pre-
cise cause of airway obstruction in the unconscious
state has been identified by studying patients under
general anaesthesia.98,99 These studies of anaes-
thetised patients have shown that the site of air-
way obstruction is at the soft palate and epiglottis
and not the tongue. Obstruction may be caused
also by vomit or blood (regurgitation of gastric
contents or trauma), or by foreign bodies. Laryn-
geal obstruction may be caused by oedema from
burns, inflammation or anaphylaxis. Upper airway
stimulation may cause laryngeal spasm. Obstruc-
tion of the airway below the larynx is less com-
S50
Figure 4.3 Causes of airway obstruction.
mon, but may arise from excessive bronchial secre-
tions, mucosal oedema, bronchospasm, pulmonary
oedema or aspiration of gastric contents.
Recognition of airway obstruction
Airway obstruction can be subtle and is often missed
by healthcare professionals, let alone by lay peo-
ple. The ‘look, listen and feel’ approach is a simple,
systematic method of detecting airway obstruction.
• Look for chest and abdominal movements.
• Listen and feel for airflow at the mouth and nose.
In partial airway obstruction, air entry is dimin-
ished and usually noisy. Inspiratory stridor is caused
by obstruction at the laryngeal level or above. Expi-
ratory wheeze implies obstruction of the lower air-
ways, which tend to collapse and obstruct during
expiration. Other characteristic sounds include the
following:
• Gurgling is caused by liquid or semisolid foreign
material in the main airways.
• Snoring arises when the pharynx is partially
occluded by the soft palate or epiglottis.
• Crowing is the sound of laryngeal spasm.
J.P. Nolan et al.
In a patient who is making respiratory efforts,
complete airway obstruction causes paradoxical
chest and abdominal movement, often described
as ‘see-saw breathing’. As the patient attempts to
breathe in, the chest is drawn in and the abdomen
expands; the opposite occurs during expiration.
This is in contrast to the normal breathing pattern
of synchronous movement upwards and outwards
of the abdomen (pushed down by the diaphragm)
with the lifting of the chest wall. During airway
obstruction, other accessory muscles of respiration
are used, with the neck and the shoulder mus-
cles contracting to assist movement of the tho-
racic cage. Full examination of the neck, chest and
abdomen is required to differentiate the paradox-
ical movements that may mimic normal respira-
tion. The examination must include listening for
the absence of breath sounds in order to diagnose
complete airway obstruction reliably; any noisy
breathing indicates partial airway obstruction. Dur-
ing apnoea, when spontaneous breathing move-
ments are absent, complete airway obstruction is
recognised by failure to inflate the lungs during
attempted positive pressure ventilation. Unless air-
way patency can be re-established to enable ade-
quate lung ventilation within a period of a very few
minutes, neurological and other vital organ injury
may occur, leading to cardiac arrest.
Basic airway management
Once any degree of obstruction is recognised,
immediate measures must be taken to create and
maintain a clear airway. There are three manoeu-
vres that may improve the patency of an airway
obstructed by the tongue or other upper airway
structures: head tilt, chin lift, and jaw thrust.
Head tilt and chin lift
The rescuer’s hand is placed on the patient’s fore-
head and the head gently tilted back; the fingertips
of the other hand are placed under the point of the
patient’s chin, which is gently lifted to stretch the
anterior neck structures (Figure 4.4).100—105
Jaw thrust
Jaw thrust is an alternative manoeuvre for bringing
the mandible forward and relieving obstruction by
the soft palate and epiglottis. The rescuer’s index
and other fingers are placed behind the angle of
the mandible, and pressure is applied upwards and
forwards. Using the thumbs, the mouth is opened
slightly by downward displacement of the chin
(Figure 4.5).
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 4.4 Head tilt and chin lift. © 2005 European
Resuscitation Council.
These simple positional methods are successful
in most cases where airway obstruction results from
relaxation of the soft tissues. If a clear airway can-
not be achieved, look for other causes of airway
obstruction. Use a finger sweep to remove any solid
foreign body seen in the mouth. Remove broken or
displaced dentures, but leave well-fitting dentures
as they help to maintain the contours of the mouth,
facilitating a good seal for ventilation.
Figure 4.5 Jaw thrust. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
S51
Airway management in patients with suspected
cervical spine injury
If spinal injury is suspected (e.g., if the victim has
fallen, been struck on the head or neck, or has been
rescued after diving into shallow water), maintain
the head, neck, chest and lumbar region in the neu-
tral position during resuscitation. Excessive head
tilt could aggravate the injury and damage the cer-
vical spinal cord106—110 ; however, this complication
has not been documented and the relative risk is
unknown. When there is a risk of cervical spine
injury, establish a clear upper airway by using jaw
thrust or chin lift in combination with manual in-
line stabilisation (MILS) of the head and neck by an
assistant.111,112 If life-threatening airway obstruc-
tion persists despite effective application of jaw
thrust or chin lift, add head tilt a small amount
at a time until the airway is open; establishing a
patent airway takes priority over concerns about a
potential cervical spine injury.
Adjuncts to basic airway techniques
Simple airway adjuncts are often helpful, and
sometimes essential, to maintain an open airway,
particularly when resuscitation is prolonged. The
position of the head and neck must be maintained
to keep the airway aligned. Oropharyngeal and
nasopharyngeal airways overcome backward dis-
placement of the soft palate and tongue in an
unconscious patient, but head tilt and jaw thrust
may also be required.
Oropharyngeal airways. Oropharyngeal airways
are available in sizes suitable for the newborn
to large adults. An estimate of the size required
is obtained by selecting an airway with a length
corresponding to the vertical distance between
S52
Figure 4.6 Insertion of oropharyngeal airway. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
the patient’s incisors and the angle of the jaw
(Figure 4.6). The most common sizes are 2, 3 and 4
for small, medium and large adults, respectively.
If the glossopharyngeal and laryngeal reflexes
are present, vomiting or laryngospasm may be
caused by inserting an oropharyngeal airway; thus,
insertion should be attempted only in comatose
patients. The oropharyngeal airway can become
obstructed at three possible sites:113 part of the
tongue can occlude the end of the airway; the air-
way can lodge in the vallecula; and the airway can
be obstructed by the epiglottis.
Nasopharyngeal airways. In patients who are not
deeply unconscious, a nasopharyngeal airway is
tolerated better than an oropharyngeal airway.
The nasopharyngeal airway may be life saving in
patients with clenched jaws, trismus or maxillofa-
cial injuries, when insertion of an oral airway is
impossible. Inadvertent insertion of a nasopharyn-
geal airway through a fracture of the skull base
and into the cranial vault is possible, but extremely
rare.114,115 In the presence of a known or suspected
basal skull fracture an oral airway is preferred but,
if this is not possible and the airway is obstructed,
gentle insertion of a nasopharyngeal airway may be
life saving (i.e., the benefits may far outweigh the
risks).
The tubes are sized in millimetres according to
their internal diameter, and the length increases
with diameter. The traditional methods of siz-
ing a nasopharyngeal airway (measurement against
the patient’s little finger or anterior nares) do
not correlate with the airway anatomy and are
unreliable.116 Sizes of 6—7 mm are suitable for
adults. Insertion can cause damage to the mucosal
lining of the nasal airway, with bleeding in up to
30% of cases.117 If the tube is too long it may stim-
ulate the laryngeal or glossopharyngeal reflexes to
produce laryngospasm or vomiting.
J.P. Nolan et al.
Oxygen
Give oxygen whenever it is available. A stan-
dard oxygen mask will deliver up to 50% oxy-
gen concentration, providing the flow of oxygen
is high enough. A mask with a reservoir bag (non-
rebreathing mask), can deliver an inspired oxygen
concentration of 85% at flows of 10—15 l min−1 . Ini-
tially, give the highest possible oxygen concentra-
tion, which can then be titrated to the oxygen sat-
uration by pulse oximeter (SpO2 ) or arterial blood
gases.
Suction
Use a wide-bore rigid sucker (Yankauer) to remove
liquid (blood, saliva and gastric contents) from
the upper airway. Use the sucker cautiously if the
patient has an intact gag reflex; the sucker can pro-
voke vomiting.
Ventilation
Provide artificial ventilation as soon as possible
for any patient in whom spontaneous ventilation
is inadequate or absent. Expired air ventilation
(rescue breathing) is effective, but the rescuer’s
expired oxygen concentration is only 16—17%, so
it must be replaced as soon as possible by venti-
lation with oxygen-enriched air. Although mouth-
to-mouth ventilation has the benefit of not requir-
ing any equipment, the technique is aestheti-
cally unpleasant, particularly when vomit or blood
is present, and rescuers may be reluctant to
place themselves in intimate contact with a vic-
tim who may be unknown to them.118—121 There
are only isolated reports of individuals acquiring
infections after providing CPR, e.g. tuberculosis122
and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
(SARS).123 Transmission of human immunodefi-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 4.7 Mouth-to-mask ventilation. © 2005 Euro-
pean Resuscitation Council.
ciency virus (HIV) during provision of CPR has
never been reported. Simple adjuncts are avail-
able to enable direct person-to-person contact to
be avoided; some of these devices may reduce the
risk of cross-infection between patient and res-
cuer, although they are unlikely to offer significant
protection from SARS.123 The pocket resuscitation
mask is used widely. It is similar to an anaesthetic
facemask, and enables mouth-to-mask ventilation.
It has a unidirectional valve, which directs the
patient’s expired air away from the rescuer. The
mask is transparent so that vomit or blood from the
patient can be seen. Some masks have a connec-
tor for the addition of oxygen. When using masks
without a connector, supplemental oxygen can be
given by placing the tubing underneath one side and
ensuring an adequate seal. Use a two-hand tech-
nique to maximise the seal with the patient’s face
(Figure 4.7).
High airway pressures can be generated if the
tidal volumes or inspiratory flows are excessive,
predisposing to gastric inflation and subsequent risk
of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. The pos-
sibility of gastric inflation is increased by
• malalignment of the head and neck, and an
obstructed airway
• an incompetent oesophageal sphincter (present
in all patients with cardiac arrest)
• a high inflation pressure
Conversely, if inspiratory flow is too low, inspi-
ratory time will be prolonged and the time avail-
able to give chest compressions is reduced. Deliver
each breath over approximately 1 s and transfer
a volume that corresponds to normal chest move-
ment; this represents a compromise between giving
S53
an adequate volume, minimising the risk of gas-
tric inflation, and allowing adequate time for chest
compressions. During CPR with an unprotected air-
way, give two ventilations after each sequence of
30 chest compressions.
Self-inflating bag
The self-inflating bag can be connected to a face-
mask, tracheal tube or alternative airway device
such as the LMA or Combitube. Without supple-
mental oxygen, the self-inflating bag ventilates
the patient’s lungs with ambient air (21% oxygen).
This can be increased to about 45% by attaching
oxygen directly to the bag. If a reservoir system
is attached and the oxygen flow is increased to
approximately 10 l min−1 , an inspired oxygen con-
centration of approximately 85% can be achieved.
Although the bag-mask device enables ventila-
tion with high concentrations of oxygen, its use by a
single person requires considerable skill. When used
with a face mask, it is often difficult to achieve a
gas-tight seal between the mask and the patient’s
face, and to maintain a patent airway with one hand
while squeezing the bag with the other.124 Any sig-
nificant leak will cause hypoventilation and, if the
airway is not patent, gas may be forced into the
stomach.125,126 This will reduce ventilation further
and greatly increase the risk of regurgitation and
aspiration.127 Cricoid pressure can reduce this risk
but requires the presence of a trained assistant.
Poorly applied cricoid pressure may make it more
difficult to ventilate the patient’s lungs.128
The two-person technique for bag-mask venti-
lation is preferable (Figure 4.8). One person holds
the facemask in place using a jaw thrust with both
Figure 4.8 The two-person technique for bag-mask ven-
tilation. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.
S54
hands, and an assistant squeezes the bag. In this
way, a better seal can be achieved and the patient’s
lungs can be ventilated more effectively and safely.
Once a tracheal tube, Combitube or supraglottic
airway device has been inserted, ventilate the lungs
at a rate of 10 breaths min−1 and continue chest
compressions without pausing during ventilations.
The seal of the LMA around the larynx is unlikely
to be good enough to prevent at least some gas
leaking when inspiration coincides with chest com-
pressions. Moderate gas leakage is acceptable, par-
ticularly as most of this gas will pass up through the
patient’s mouth; if excessive gas leakage results in
inadequate ventilation of the patient’s lungs, chest
compressions will have to be interrupted to enable
ventilation, using a compression—ventilation ratio
of 30:2.
Automatic ventilators
Very few studies address specific aspects of ventila-
tion during advanced life support. There are some
data indicating that the ventilation rates delivered
by healthcare personnel during cardiac arrest are
excessive.61,129 Automatic ventilators or resuscita-
tors provide a constant flow of gas to the patient
during inspiration; the volume delivered is depen-
dent on the inspiratory time (a longer time provides
a greater tidal volume). Because pressure in the air-
way rises during inspiration, these devices are often
pressure limited to protect the lungs against baro-
trauma. An automatic ventilator can be used with
either a facemask or other airway device (e.g., tra-
cheal tube, LMA).
An automatic resuscitator should be set ini-
tially to deliver a tidal volume of 6—7 ml kg−1 at
10 breaths min−1 . Some ventilators have coordi-
nated markings on the controls to facilitate easy
and rapid adjustment for patients of different sizes,
and others are capable of sophisticated variation in
respiratory pattern. In the presence of a sponta-
neous circulation, the correct setting will be deter-
mined by analysis of the patient’s arterial blood
gases.
Automatic resuscitators provide many advan-
tages over alternative methods of ventilation.
• In unintubated patients, the rescuer has both
hands free for mask and airway alignment.
• Cricoid pressure can be applied with one hand
while the other seals the mask on the face.
• In intubated patients they free the rescuer for
other tasks.
• Once set, they provide a constant tidal volume,
respiratory rate and minute ventilation; thus,
they may help to avoid excessive ventilation.
J.P. Nolan et al.
A manikin study of simulated cardiac arrest and
a study involving fire-fighters ventilating the lungs
of anaesthetised patients both showed a signifi-
cant decrease in gastric inflation with manually-
triggered flow-limited oxygen-powered resuscita-
tors and mask compared with a bag-mask.130,131
However, the effect of automatic resuscitators on
gastric inflation in humans in cardiac arrest has not
been studied, and there are no data demonstrating
clear benefit over bag-valve-mask devices.
Alternative airway devices
The tracheal tube has generally been considered
the optimal method of managing the airway dur-
ing cardiac arrest. There is evidence that, without
adequate training and experience, the incidence of
complications, such as unrecognised oesophageal
intubation (6—14% in some studies)132—135 and
dislodgement, is unacceptably high.136 Prolonged
attempts at tracheal intubation are harmful; the
cessation of chest compressions during this time
will compromise coronary and cerebral perfusion.
Several alternative airway devices have been con-
sidered for airway management during CPR. The
Combitube, the LMA, and the Laryngeal Tube
(LT) are the only alternative devices to be stud-
ied during CPR, but none of these studies have
been powered adequately to enable survival to
be studied as a primary endpoint; instead, most
researchers have studied insertion and ventilation
success rates. There are no data supporting the
routine use of any specific approach to airway
management during cardiac arrest. The best tech-
nique is dependent on the precise circumstances
of the cardiac arrest and the competence of the
rescuer.
Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)
The laryngeal mask airway comprises a wide-bore
tube with an elliptical inflated cuff designed to seal
around the laryngeal opening (Figure 4.9). It is eas-
ier to insert than a tracheal tube.137—143 The LMA
has been studied during CPR, but none of these
studies has compared it directly with the tracheal
tube. During CPR, successful ventilation is achieved
with the LMA in 72—98% of cases.144—150
Ventilation using the LMA is more efficient and
easier than with a bag-mask.124 When an LMA can be
inserted without delay it is preferable to avoid bag-
mask ventilation altogether. When used for inter-
mittent positive pressure ventilation, provided high
inflation pressures (>20 cm H2 O) are avoided, gas-
tric inflation can be minimised. In comparison with
bag-mask ventilation, use of a self-inflating bag and
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S55

Figure 4.9 Insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. © 2005 European Resuscitation Council.

LMA during cardiac arrest reduces the incidence of
regurgitation.127
In comparison with tracheal intubation, the per-
ceived disadvantages of the LMA are the increased
risk of aspiration and inability to provide adequate
ventilation in patients with low lung and/or chest-
wall compliance. There are no data demonstrating
whether or not it is possible to provide adequate
ventilation via an LMA without interruption of chest
compressions. The ability to ventilate the lungs
adequately while continuing to compress the chest
may be one of the main benefits of a tracheal tube.
There are remarkably few cases of pulmonary aspi-
ration reported in the studies of the LMA during
CPR.
The Combitube
The Combitube is a double-lumen tube intro-
duced blindly over the tongue, and provides a
route for ventilation whether the tube has passed
into the oesophagus (Figure 4.10a) or the tra-

Figure 4.10 (a) Combitube in the oesophageal position. (b) Combitube in the tracheal position. © 2005 European
Resuscitation Council.
S56
chea (Figure 4.10b). There are many studies of
the Combitube in CPR and successful ventilation
was achieved in 79—98% of patients.146,151—157 All
except one151 of these studies involved out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest, which reflects the infre-
quency with which the Combitube is used in hospi-
tals. On the basis of these studies, the Combitube
appears as safe and effective as tracheal intubation
for airway management during cardiac arrest; how-
ever, there are inadequate survival data to be able
to comment with certainty on the impact on out-
come. It is possible to attempt to ventilate the lungs
through the wrong port of the Combitube (2.2% in
one study)152 : This is equivalent to unrecognised
oesophageal intubation with a standard tracheal
tube.
Other airway devices
Laryngeal Tube. The LT is a relatively new air-
way device; its function in anaesthetised patients
has been reported in several studies. The per-
formance of the LT is favourable in comparison
with the classic LMA and LMA,158,159 and success-
ful insertion rates have been reported even in
studies of paramedics.160 There are sporadic case
reports relating to use of the laryngeal tube during
CPR.161,162 In a recent study, the LT was placed in
30 patients in cardiac arrest out of hospital by mini-
mally trained nurses.163 LT insertion was successful
within two attempts in 90% of patients, and ventila-
tion was adequate in 80% of cases. No regurgitation
occurred in any patient.
ProSeal LMA. The ProSeal LMA has been studied
extensively in anaesthetised patients, but there are
no studies of its function and performance during
CPR. It has several attributes that, in theory, make
it more suitable than the classic LMA for use dur-
ing CPR: improved seal with the larynx enabling
ventilation at higher airway pressures,164,165 the
inclusion of a gastric drain tube enabling venting of
liquid regurgitated gastric contents from the upper
oesophagus and passage of a gastric tube to drain
liquid gastric contents, and the inclusion of a bite
block. The Proseal LMA has potential weaknesses as
an airway device for CPR: it is slightly more difficult
to insert than a classic LMA, it is not available in dis-
posable form and is relatively expensive, and solid
regurgitated gastric contents will block the gastric
drainage tube. Data are awaited on its performance
during CPR.
Airway management device. In anaesthetised
patients, the airway management device (AMD)
performed poorly in one study,166 but a modified
J.P. Nolan et al.
version appeared to function slightly better.167 The
pharyngeal airway express (PAX) also performed
poorly in one study of anaesthetised patients.168
There are no data on the use of either of these
devices during CPR.
Intubating LMA. The intubating LMA (ILMA) is
valuable for managing the difficult airway during
anaesthesia, but it has not been studied during
CPR. Although it is relatively easy to insert the
ILMA,169,170 reliable, blind insertion of a tracheal
tube requires considerable training171 and, for this
reason, it is not an ideal technique for the inexpe-
rienced provider.
Tracheal intubation
There is insufficient evidence to support or refute
the use of any specific technique to maintain an
airway and provide ventilation in adults with car-
diopulmonary arrest. Despite this, tracheal intuba-
tion is perceived as the optimal method of providing
and maintaining a clear and secure airway. It should
be used only when trained personnel are available
to carry out the procedure with a high level of skill
and confidence. The only randomised controlled
trial comparing tracheal intubation with bag-mask
ventilation was undertaken in children requir-
ing airway management out-of-hospital.172 In this
investigation there was no difference in survival to
discharge, but it is unclear how applicable this pae-
diatric study is to adult resuscitation. Two reports
compared outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest in adults when treated by either emer-
gency medical technicians or paramedics.173,174
The skills provided by the paramedics, including
intubation and intravenous cannulation and drug
administration,174 made no difference to survival
to hospital discharge.
The perceived advantages of tracheal intubation
over bag-mask ventilation include: maintenance of
a patent airway, which is protected from aspiration
of gastric contents or blood from the oropharynx;
ability to provide an adequate tidal volume reliably
even when chest compressions are uninterrupted;
the potential to free the rescuer’s hands for other
tasks; the ability to suction airway secretions; and
the provision of a route for giving drugs. Use of the
bag-mask is more likely to cause gastric distension
which, theoretically, is more likely to cause regur-
gitation with risk of aspiration. However, there are
no reliable data to indicate that the incidence of
aspiration is any more in cardiac arrest patients
ventilated with bag-mask versus those that are ven-
tilated via tracheal tube.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
The perceived disadvantages of tracheal intu-
bation over bag-mask ventilation include: the risk
of an unrecognised misplaced tracheal tube, which
in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in
some studies ranges from 6%132—134 to 14%135 ; a
prolonged period without chest compressions while
intubation is attempted; and a comparatively high
failure rate. Intubation success rates correlate with
the intubation experience attained by individual
paramedics.175 Rates for failure to intubate are
as high as 50% in prehospital systems with a low
patient volume and providers who do not perform
intubation frequently.134 The cost of training pre-
hospital staff to undertake intubation should also
be considered. Healthcare personnel who under-
take prehospital intubation should do so only within
a structured, monitored programme, which should
include comprehensive competency-based training
and regular opportunities to refresh skills.
In some cases, laryngoscopy and attempted
intubation may prove impossible or cause life-
threatening deterioration in the patient’s condi-
tion. Such circumstances include acute epiglot-
tal conditions, pharyngeal pathology, head injury
(where straining may occur further rise in intracra-
nial pressure) or cervical spine injury. In these
circumstances, specialist skills such as the use of
anaesthetic drugs or fibreoptic laryngoscopy may
be required. These techniques require a high level
of skill and training.
Rescuers must weigh the risks and benefits of
intubation against the need to provide effective
chest compressions. The intubation attempt will
require interruption of chest compressions but,
once an advanced airway is in place, ventilation
will not require interruption of chest compressions.
Personnel skilled in advanced airway management
should be able to undertake laryngoscopy with-
out stopping chest compressions; a brief pause in
chest compressions will be required only as the
tube is passed through the vocal cords. Alterna-
tively, to avoid any interruptions in chest compres-
sions, the intubation attempt may be deferred until
return of spontaneous circulation. No intubation
attempt should take longer than 30 s; if intubation
has not been achieved after this time, recommence
bag-mask ventilation. After intubation, tube place-
ment must be confirmed and the tube secured ade-
quately.
Confirmation of correct placement of the
tracheal tube
Unrecognised oesophageal intubation is the most
serious complication of attempted tracheal intuba-
tion. Routine use of primary and secondary tech-
S57
niques to confirm correct placement of the tra-
cheal tube should reduce this risk. Primary assess-
ment includes observation of chest expansion bilat-
erally, auscultation over the lung fields bilater-
ally in the axillae (breath sounds should be equal
and adequate) and over the epigastrium (breath
sounds should not be heard). Clinical signs of cor-
rect tube placement (condensation in the tube,
chest rise, breath sounds on auscultation of lungs,
and inability to hear gas entering the stomach) are
not completely reliable. Secondary confirmation of
tracheal tube placement by an exhaled carbon diox-
ide or oesophageal detection device should reduce
the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation. If
there is doubt about correct tube placement, use
the laryngoscope and look directly to see if the tube
passes through the vocal cords.
None of the secondary confirmation techniques
will differentiate between a tube placed in a main
bronchus and one placed correctly in the trachea.
There are inadequate data to identify the optimal
method of confirming tube placement during car-
diac arrest, and all devices should be considered
as adjuncts to other confirmatory techniques.176
There are no data quantifying their ability to mon-
itor tube position after initial placement.
The oesophageal detector device creates a suc-
tion force at the tracheal end of the tracheal
tube, either by pulling back the plunger on a large
syringe or releasing a compressed flexible bulb. Air
is aspirated easily from the lower airways through
a tracheal tube placed in the cartilage-supported
rigid trachea. When the tube is in the oesopha-
gus, air cannot be aspirated because the oesoph-
agus collapses when aspiration is attempted. The
oesophageal detector device is generally reliable in
patients with both a perfusing and a non-perfusing
rhythm, but it may be misleading in patients with
morbid obesity, late pregnancy or severe asthma
or when there are copious tracheal secretions; in
these conditions the trachea may collapse when
aspiration is attempted.133,177—180
Carbon dioxide detector devices measure the
concentration of exhaled carbon dioxide from the
lungs. The persistence of exhaled carbon dioxide
after six ventilations indicates placement of the
tracheal tube in the trachea or a main bronchus.181
Confirmation of correct placement above the carina
will require auscultation of the chest bilaterally in
the mid-axillary lines. In patients with a sponta-
neous circulation, a lack of exhaled carbon dioxide
indicates that the tube is in the oesophagus. Dur-
ing cardiac arrest, pulmonary blood flow may be so
low that there is insufficient exhaled carbon diox-
ide, so the detector does not identify a correctly
placed tracheal tube. When exhaled carbon dioxide
S58
is detected in cardiac arrest, it indicates reliably
that the tube is in the trachea or main bronchus but,
when it is absent, tracheal tube placement is best
confirmed with an oesophageal detector device. A
variety of electronic as well as simple, inexpensive,
colorimetric carbon dioxide detectors are available
for both in-hospital and out-of-hospital use.
Cricoid pressure
During bag-mask ventilation and attempted intuba-
tion, cricoid pressure applied by a trained assis-
tant should prevent passive regurgitation of gas-
tric contents and the consequent risk of pulmonary
aspiration. If the technique is applied imprecisely
or with excessive force, ventilation and intubation
can be made more difficult.128 If ventilation of the
patient’s lungs is not possible, reduce the pressure
applied to the cricoid cartilage or remove it com-
pletely. If the patient vomits, release the cricoid
immediately.
Securing the tracheal tube
Accidental dislodgement of a tracheal tube can
occur at any time, but may be more likely during
resuscitation and during transport. The most effec-
tive method for securing the tracheal tube has yet
to be determined; use either conventional tapes or
ties, or purpose-made tracheal tube holders.
Cricothyroidotomy
Occasionally, it will be impossible to ventilate an
apnoeic patient with a bag-mask, or to pass a tra-
cheal tube or alternative airway device. This may
occur in patients with extensive facial trauma or
laryngeal obstruction due to oedema or foreign
material. In these circumstances, delivery of oxy-
gen through a needle or surgical cricothyroidotomy
may be life-saving. A tracheostomy is contraindi-
cated in an emergency, as it is time consuming,
hazardous and requires considerable surgical skill
and equipment.
Surgical cricothyroidotomy provides a defini-
tive airway that can be used to ventilate the
patient’s lungs until semi-elective intubation or tra-
cheostomy is performed. Needle cricothyroidotomy
is a much more temporary procedure providing
only short-term oxygenation. It requires a wide-
bore, non-kinking cannula, a high-pressure oxygen
source, runs the risk of barotrauma and can be par-
ticularly ineffective in patients with chest trauma.
It is also prone to failure because of kinking of the
cannula, and is unsuitable for patient transfer.
J.P. Nolan et al.
4e. Assisting the circulation
Drugs and fluids for cardiac arrest
This topic is divided into: drugs used during the
management of a cardiac arrest; anti-arrhythmic
drugs used in the peri-arrest period; other drugs
used in the peri-arrest period; fluids; and routes
for drug delivery. Every effort has been made to
provide accurate information on the drugs in these
guidelines, but literature from the relevant phar-
maceutical companies will provide the most up-to-
date data.
Drugs used during the treatment of cardiac
arrest
Only a few drugs are indicated during the imme-
diate management of a cardiac arrest, and there
is limited scientific evidence supporting their use.
Drugs should be considered only after initial shocks
have been delivered (if indicated) and chest com-
pressions and ventilation have been started.
There are three groups of drugs relevant to the
management of cardiac arrest that were reviewed
during the 2005 Consensus Conference: vasopres-
sors, anti-arrhythmics and other drugs. Routes of
drug delivery other than the optimal intravenous
route were also reviewed and are discussed.
Vasopressors
There are currently no placebo-controlled studies
showing that the routine use of any vasopressor at
any stage during human cardiac arrest increases
survival to hospital discharge. The primary goal
of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is to re-establish
blood flow to vital organs until the restoration of
spontaneous circulation. Despite the lack of data
from cardiac arrest in humans, vasopressors con-
tinue to be recommended as a means of increasing
cerebral and coronary perfusion during CPR.
Adrenaline (epinephrine) versus vasopressin.
Adrenaline has been the primary sympathomimetic
agent for the management of cardiac arrest for
40 years.182 Its primary efficacy is due to its
alpha-adrenergic, vasoconstrictive effects caus-
ing systemic vasoconstriction, which increases
coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures. The
beta-adrenergic actions of adrenaline (inotropic,
chronotropic) may increase coronary and cerebral
blood flow, but concomitant increases in myocar-
dial oxygen consumption, ectopic ventricular
arrhythmias (particularly when the myocardium
is acidotic) and transient hypoxaemia due to
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
pulmonary arteriovenous shunting may offset these
benefits.
The potentially deleterious beta-effects of
adrenaline have led to exploration of alternative
vasopressors. Vasopressin is a naturally occurring
antidiuretic hormone. In very high doses it is a
powerful vasoconstrictor that acts by stimulation
of smooth muscle V1 receptors. The importance of
vasopressin in cardiac arrest was first recognised in
studies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients,
where vasopressin levels were found to be higher in
successfully resuscitated patients.183,184 Although
clinical185,186 and animal187—189 studies demon-
strated improved haemodynamic variables when
using vasopressin as an alternative to adrenaline
during resuscitation from cardiac arrest, some,186
but not all, demonstrated improved survival.190,191
The first clinical use of vasopressin during car-
diac arrest was reported in 1996 and appeared
promising. In a study of cardiac arrest patients
refractory to standard therapy with adrenaline,
vasopressin restored a spontaneous circulation in
all eight patients, three of whom were discharged
neurologically intact.186 The following year, the
same group published a small randomised trial
of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, in which
the rates of successful resuscitation and sur-
vival for 24 h were significantly higher in patients
treated with vasopressin than in those treated with
adrenaline.192 Following these two studies, the
American Heart Association (AHA) recommended
that vasopressin could be used as an alternative
to adrenaline for the treatment of adult shock-
refractory VF.182 The success of these small stud-
ies led to two large randomised studies compar-
ing vasopressin with adrenaline for in-hospital193
and out-of-hospital194 cardiac arrest. Both stud-
ies randomised patients to receive vasopressin or
adrenaline initially, and used adrenaline as a res-
cue treatment in patients refractory to the initial
drug. Both studies were unable to demonstrate an
overall increase in the rates of ROSC or survival
for vasopressin 40 U,193 with the dose repeated
in one study,194 when compared with adrenaline
(1 mg, repeated), as the initial vasopressor. In the
large out-of-hospital cardiac arrest study,194 post-
hoc analysis suggested that the subset of patients
with asystole had significant improvement in sur-
vival to discharge, but survival neurologically intact
was no different.
A recent meta-analysis of five randomised
trials195 showed no statistically significant differ-
ence between vasopressin and adrenaline for ROSC,
death within 24 h or death before hospital dis-
charge. The subgroup analysis based on initial car-
diac rhythm did not show any statistically signifi-
S59
cant difference in the rate of death before hospital
discharge.195
Participants at the 2005 Consensus Conference
debated in depth the treatment recommendations
that should follow from this evidence. Despite the
absence of placebo-controlled trials, adrenaline
has been the standard vasopressor in cardiac arrest.
It was agreed that there is currently insufficient
evidence to support or refute the use of vaso-
pressin as an alternative to, or in combination with,
adrenaline in any cardiac arrest rhythm. Current
practice still supports adrenaline as the primary
vasopressor for the treatment of cardiac arrest of
all rhythms.
Adrenaline
Indications
• Adrenaline is the first drug used in cardiac arrest
of any aetiology: it is included in the ALS algo-
rithm for use every 3—5 min of CPR.
• Adrenaline is preferred in the treatment of ana-
phylaxis (Section 7g).
• Adrenaline is second-line treatment for cardio-
genic shock.
Dose. During cardiac arrest, the initial intra-
venous dose of adrenaline is 1 mg. When intravascu-
lar (intravenous or intra-osseous) access is delayed
or cannot be achieved, give 2—3 mg, diluted to
10 ml with sterile water, via the tracheal tube.
Absorption via the tracheal route is highly variable.
There is no evidence supporting the use of higher
doses of adrenaline for patients in refractory car-
diac arrest. In some cases, an adrenaline infusion is
required in the post-resuscitation period.
Following return of spontaneous circulation,
excessive (≥1 mg) doses of adrenaline may induce
tachycardia, myocardial ischaemia, VT and VF.
Once a perfusing rhythm is established, if further
adrenaline is deemed necessary, titrate the dose
carefully to achieve an appropriate blood pressure.
Intravenous doses of 50—100 mcg are usually suffi-
cient for most hypotensive patients. Use adrenaline
cautiously in patients with cardiac arrest associated
with cocaine or other sympathomimetic drugs.
Use. Adrenaline is available most commonly in
two dilutions:
• 1 in 10,000 (10 ml of this solution contains 1 mg
of adrenaline)
• 1 in 1000 (1 ml of this solution contains 1 mg of
adrenaline)
Both these dilutions are used routinely in European
countries.
S60
Various other pressor drugs (e.g.,
noradrenaline)196 have been used experimen-
tally as an alternative to adrenaline for the
treatment of cardiac arrest.
Anti-arrhythmics
As with vasopressors, the evidence that anti-
arrhythmic drugs are of benefit in cardiac arrest
is limited. No anti-arrhythmic drug given during
human cardiac arrest has been shown to increase
survival to hospital discharge, although amiodarone
has been shown to increase survival to hospital
admission.89,90 Despite the lack of human long-term
outcome data, the balance of evidence is in favour
of the use anti-arrhythmic drugs for the manage-
ment of arrhythmias in cardiac arrest.
Amiodarone. Amiodarone is a membrane-
stabilising anti-arrhythmic drug that increases the
duration of the action potential and refractory
period in atrial and ventricular myocardium. Atri-
oventricular conduction is slowed, and a similar
effect is seen with accessory pathways. Amiodarone
has a mild negative inotropic action and causes
peripheral vasodilation through non-competitive
alpha-blocking effects. The hypotension that
occurs with intravenous amiodarone is related to
the rate of delivery and is due more to the solvent
(Polysorbate 80), which causes histamine release,
rather than the drug itself.197 The use of an
aqueous amiodarone preparation that is relatively
free from these side effects is encouraged but is
not yet widely available 198,199 .
Following three initial shocks, amiodarone in
shock-refractory VF improves the short-term out-
come of survival to hospital admission com-
pared with placebo89 or lignocaine.90 Amio-
darone also appears to improve the response to
defibrillation when given to humans or animals
with VF or haemodynamically unstable ventricular
tachycardia.198—202 There is no evidence to indi-
cate the time at which amiodarone should be given
when using a single shock strategy. In the clini-
cal studies to date, the amiodarone was given if
VF/VT persisted after at least three shocks. For this
reason, and in the absence of any other data, amio-
darone 300 mg is recommended if VF/VT persists
after three shocks.
Indications. Amiodarone is indicated in
• refractory VF/VT
• haemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia
(VT) and other resistant tachyarrhythmias (Sec-
tion 4f)
Dose. Consider an initial intravenous dose of
300 mg amiodarone, diluted in 5% dextrose to a
J.P. Nolan et al.
volume of 20 ml (or from a pre-filled syringe), if
VF/VT persists after the third shock. Amiodarone
can cause thrombophlebitis when injected into a
peripheral vein; use a central venous catheter if
one is in situ but,if not, use a large peripheral vein
and a generous flush. Details about the use of amio-
darone for the treatment of other arrhythmias are
given in Section 4f.
Clinical aspects of use. Amiodarone may para-
doxically be arrhythmogenic, especially if given
concurrently with drugs that prolong the QT
interval. However, it has a lower incidence of
pro-arrhythmic effects than other anti-arrhythmic
drugs under similar circumstances. The major acute
adverse effects from amiodarone are hypotension
and bradycardia, which can be prevented by slow-
ing the rate of drug infusion, or can be treated with
fluids and/or inotropic drugs. The side effects asso-
ciated with prolonged oral use (abnormalities of
thyroid function, corneal microdeposits, peripheral
neuropathy, and pulmonary/hepatic infiltrates) are
not relevant in the acute setting.
Lidocaine. Until the publication of the 2000 ILCOR
guidelines, lidocaine was the antiarrhythmic drug
of choice. Comparative studies with amiodarone90
have displaced it from this position, and lidocaine
is now recommended only when amiodarone is
unavailable. Amiodarone should be available at all
hospital arrests and to all out-of-hospital arrests
attended by ambulance crew.
Lidocaine is a membrane-stabilising anti-
arrhythmic drug that acts by increasing the
myocyte refractory period. It decreases ventricular
automaticity, and its local anaesthetic action
suppresses ventricular ectopic activity. Lidocaine
suppresses activity of depolarised, arrhythmogenic
tissues while interfering minimally with the elec-
trical activity of normal tissues. Therefore, it is
effective in suppressing arrhythmias associated
with depolarisation (e.g. ischaemia, digitalis toxic-
ity) but is relatively ineffective against arrhythmias
occurring in normally polarised cells (e.g., atrial
fibrillation/flutter). Lidocaine raises the threshold
for ventricular fibrillation.
Lidocaine toxicity causes paraesthesia, drowsi-
ness, confusion and muscular twitching progressing
to convulsions. It is considered generally that a safe
dose of lidocaine must not exceed 3 mg kg−1 over
the first hour. If there are signs of toxicity, stop the
infusion immediately; treat seizures if they occur.
Lidocaine depresses myocardial function, but to a
much lesser extent than amiodarone. The myocar-
dial depression is usually transient and can be
treated with intravenous fluids or vasopressors.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Indications. Lidocaine is indicated in refractory
VF/VT (when amiodarone is unavailable).
Dose. When amiodarone is unavailable, con-
sider an initial dose of 100 mg (1—1.5 mg kg−1 ) of
lidocaine for VF/pulseless VT refractory to three
shocks. Give an additional bolus of 50 mg if neces-
sary. The total dose should not exceed 3 mg kg−1
during the first hour.
Clinical aspects of use. Lidocaine is metabolised
by the liver, and its half-life is prolonged if the
hepatic blood flow is reduced, e.g. in the pres-
ence of reduced cardiac output, liver disease
or in the elderly. During cardiac arrest normal
clearance mechanisms do not function, thus high
plasma concentrations may be achieved after a
single dose. After 24 h of continuous infusion, the
plasma half-life increases significantly. Reduce the
dose in these circumstances, and regularly review
the indication for continued therapy. Lidocaine is
less effective in the presence of hypokalaemia
and hypomagnesaemia, which should be corrected
immediately.
Magnesium sulphate. Magnesium is an important
constituent of many enzyme systems, especially
those involved with ATP generation in muscle.
It plays a major role in neurochemical transmis-
sion, where it decreases acetylcholine release and
reduces the sensitivity of the motor endplate.
Magnesium also improves the contractile response
of the stunned myocardium, and limits infarct
size by a mechanism that has yet to be fully
elucidated.203 The normal plasma range of magne-
sium is 0.8—1.0 mmol l−1 .
Hypomagnesaemia is often associated with
hypokalaemia, and may contribute to arrhythmias
and cardiac arrest. Hypomagnesaemia increases
myocardial digoxin uptake and decreases cellular
Na+ /K+ -ATP-ase activity. Patients with hypomagne-
saemia, hypokalaemia, or both may become car-
diotoxic even with therapeutic digitalis levels. Mag-
nesium deficiency is not uncommon in hospitalised
patients and frequently coexists with other elec-
trolyte disturbances, particularly hypokalaemia,
hypophosphataemia, hyponatraemia and hypocal-
caemia.
Although the benefits of giving magnesium in
known hypomagnesaemic states are recognised, the
benefit of giving magnesium routinely during car-
diac arrest is unproven. Studies in adults in and out
of hospital91—95,204 have failed to demonstrate any
increase in the rate of ROSC when magnesium is
given routinely during CPR. There is some evidence
that magnesium may be beneficial in refractory
VF.205
S61
Indications. Magnesium sulphate is indicated in
• shock-refractory VF in the presence of possible
hypomagnesaemia
• ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the presence of
possible hypomagnesaemia
• torsades de pointes
• digoxin toxicity
Dose. In shock-refractory VF, give an initial intra-
venous dose of 2 g (4 ml (8 mmol)) of 50% magne-
sium sulphate) peripherally over 1—2 min; it may
be repeated after 10—15 min. Preparations of mag-
nesium sulphate solutions differ among European
countries.
Clinical aspects of use. Hypokalaemic patients
are often hypomagnesaemic. If ventricular tach-
yarrhythmias arise, intravenous magnesium is a
safe, effective treatment. The role of magnesium
in acute myocardial infarction is still in doubt. Mag-
nesium is excreted by the kidneys, but side effects
associated with hypermagnesaemia are rare, even
in renal failure. Magnesium inhibits smooth mus-
cle contraction, causing vasodilation and a dose-
related hypotension, which is usually transient and
responds to intravenous fluids and vasopressors.
Other drugs
The evidence for the benefits of other drugs, includ-
ing atropine, aminophylline and calcium, given
routinely during human cardiac arrest, is limited.
Recommendations for the use of these drugs are
based on our understanding of their pharmacody-
namic properties and the pathophysiology of car-
diac arrest.
Atropine. Atropine antagonises the action of the
parasympathetic neurotransmitter acetylcholine at
muscarinic receptors. Therefore, it blocks the
effect of the vagus nerve on both the sinoatrial (SA)
node and the atrioventricular (AV) node, increasing
sinus automaticity and facilitating AV node conduc-
tion.
Side effects of atropine are dose-related
(blurred vision, dry mouth and urinary retention);
they are not relevant during a cardiac arrest.
Acute confusional states may occur after intra-
venous injection, particularly in elderly patients.
After cardiac arrest, dilated pupils should not be
attributed solely to atropine.
Atropine is indicated in:
• asystole
• pulseless electrical activity (PEA) with a rate
<60 min−1
• sinus, atrial, or nodal bradycardia when the
haemodynamic condition of the patient is unsta-
ble
S62
The recommended adult dose of atropine for
asystole or PEA with a rate <60 min−1 is 3 mg intra-
venously in a single bolus. Its use in the treatment
of bradycardia is covered in Section 4f. Several
recent studies have failed to demonstrate any ben-
efit from atropine in out-of-hospital or in-hospital
cardiac arrests174,206—210 ; however, asystole carries
a grave prognosis and there are anecdotal accounts
of success after giving atropine. It is unlikely to be
harmful in this situation.
Theophylline (aminophylline). Theophylline is a
phosphodiesterase inhibitor that increases tissue
concentrations of cAMP and releases adrenaline
from the adrenal medulla. It has chronotropic and
inotropic actions. The limited studies of amino-
phylline in bradyasystolic cardiac arrest have failed
to demonstrate an increase in ROSC or survival to
hospital discharge211—214 ; the same studies have
not shown that harm is caused by aminophylline.
Aminophylline is indicated in:
• asystolic cardiac arrest
• peri-arrest bradycardia refractory to atropine
Theophylline is given as aminophylline, a mix-
ture of theophylline with ethylenediamine, which is
20 times more soluble than theophylline alone. The
recommended adult dose is 250—500 mg (5 mg kg−1 )
given by slow intravenous injection.
Theophylline has a narrow therapeutic win-
dow with an optimal plasma concentration of
10—20 mg l−1 (55—110 mmol l−1 ). Above this con-
centration, side effects such as arrhythmias and
convulsions may occur, especially when given
rapidly by intravenous injection.
Calcium. Calcium plays a vital role in the cellu-
lar mechanisms underlying myocardial contraction.
There are very few data supporting any benefi-
cial action for calcium after most cases of car-
diac arrest. High plasma concentrations achieved
after injection may be harmful to the ischaemic
myocardium and may impair cerebral recovery.
Give calcium during resuscitation only when indi-
cated specifically, i.e. in pulseless electrical activ-
ity caused by
• hyperkalaemia
• hypocalcaemia
• overdose of calcium channel-blocking drugs
The initial dose of 10 ml 10% calcium chloride
(6.8 mmol Ca2+ ) may be repeated if necessary.
Calcium can slow the heart rate and precipitate
arrhythmias. In cardiac arrest, calcium may be
given by rapid intravenous injection. In the pres-
ence of a spontaneous circulation give it slowly. Do
J.P. Nolan et al.
not give calcium solutions and sodium bicarbonate
simultaneously by the same route.
Buffers. Cardiac arrest results in combined res-
piratory and metabolic acidosis caused by cessa-
tion of pulmonary gas exchange and the devel-
opment of anaerobic cellular metabolism, respec-
tively. The best treatment of acidaemia in cardiac
arrest is chest compression; some additional ben-
efit is gained by ventilation. If the arterial blood
pH is less than 7.1 (or base excess more negative
than −10 mmol l−1 ) during or following resuscita-
tion from cardiac arrest, consider giving small doses
of sodium bicarbonate (50 ml of an 8.4% solution).
During cardiac arrest, arterial gas values may be
misleading and bear little relationship to the tissue
acid—base state96 ; analysis of central venous blood
may provide a better estimation of tissue pH (see
Section 4c). Bicarbonate causes generation of car-
bon dioxide, which diffuses rapidly into cells. This
has the following effects.
• It exacerbates intracellular acidosis.
• It produces a negative inotropic effect on
ischaemic myocardium.
• It presents a large, osmotically active, sodium
load to an already compromised circulation and
brain.
• It produces a shift to the left in the oxygen disso-
ciation curve, further inhibiting release of oxygen
to the tissues.
Mild acidaemia causes vasodilation and can
increase cerebral blood flow. Therefore, full cor-
rection of the arterial blood pH may theoretically
reduce cerebral blood flow at a particularly critical
time. As the bicarbonate ion is excreted as car-
bon dioxide via the lungs, ventilation needs to be
increased. For all these reasons, metabolic acidosis
must be severe to justify giving sodium bicarbon-
ate.
Several animal and clinical studies have exam-
ined the use of buffers during cardiac arrest. Clin-
ical studies using Tribonate®215 or sodium bicar-
bonate as buffers have failed to demonstrate any
advantage.216—220 Only one study has found clinical
benefit, suggesting that EMS systems using sodium
bicarbonate earlier and more frequently had sig-
nificantly higher ROSC and hospital discharge rates
and better long-term neurological outcome.221 Ani-
mal studies have generally been inconclusive, but
some have shown benefit in giving sodium bicarbon-
ate to treat cardiovascular toxicity (hypotension,
cardiac arrhythmias) caused by tricyclic antidepres-
sants and other fast sodium channel blockers (Sec-
tion 7b).222 Giving sodium bicarbonate routinely
during cardiac arrest and CPR (especially in out-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
of-hospital cardiac arrests) or after return of spon-
taneous circulation is not recommended. Consider
sodium bicarbonate for life-threatening hyper-
kalaemia or cardiac arrest associated with hyper-
kalaemia, severe metabolic acidosis, or tricyclic
overdose. Give 50 mmol (50 ml of an 8.4% solu-
tion) of sodium bicarbonate intravenously. Repeat
the dose as necessary, but use acid/base analysis
(either arterial or central venous) to guide therapy.
Severe tissue damage may be caused by subcuta-
neous extravasation of concentrated sodium bicar-
bonate. The solution is incompatible with calcium
salts as it causes the precipitation of calcium car-
bonate.
Thrombolysis during CPR. Adult cardiac arrest
is usually caused by acute myocardial ischaemia
following coronary artery occlusion by thrombus.
There are several reports on the successful use
of thrombolytics during cardiac arrest, particu-
larly when the arrest was caused by pulmonary
embolism. The use of thrombolytic drugs to break
down coronary artery and pulmonary artery throm-
bus has been the subject of several studies. Throm-
bolytics have also been demonstrated in animal
studies to have beneficial effects on cerebral blood
flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation,223,224
and a clinical study has reported less anoxic
encephalopathy after thrombolytic therapy during
CPR.225
Several studies have examined the use of throm-
bolytic therapy given during non-traumatic cardiac
arrest refractory to standard therapy. Two stud-
ies have shown an increase in ROSC with non-
significant improvements in survival to hospital
discharge,97,226 and a further study demonstrated
greater ICU survival.225 A small series of case
reports has also reported survival to discharge in
three cases refractory to standard therapy with VF
or PEA treated with thrombolytics227 ; conversely,
one large clinical trial228 failed to show any signif-
icant benefit for thrombolytics in cases of undif-
ferentiated PEA out-of-hospital cardiac arrest unre-
sponsive to initial interventions.
When given to cardiac arrest patients with
suspected or proven pulmonary embolus, two
studies have demonstrated possible benefits229,230 ;
one found an improvement in 24-h survival.229
Several clinical studies97,226,229,231 and case
series227,230,232—234 have not demonstrated any
increase in bleeding complications with thrombol-
ysis during CPR in non-traumatic cardiac arrest.
There are insufficient clinical data to recom-
mend the routine use of thrombolysis during non-
traumatic cardiac arrest. Consider thrombolytic
therapy when cardiac arrest is thought to be due
S63
to proven or suspected acute pulmonary embolus.
Thrombolysis may be considered in adult cardiac
arrest on a case by case basis following initial fail-
ure of standard resuscitation in patients in whom
an acute thrombotic aetiology for the arrest is sus-
pected. Ongoing CPR is not a contraindication to
thrombolysis.
Following thrombolysis during CPR for acute pul-
monary embolism, survival and good neurological
outcome have been reported in cases requiring in
excess of 60 min of CPR. If a thrombolytic drug is
given in these circumstances, consider performing
CPR for at least 60—90 min before termination of
resuscitation attempts.235,236
Intravenous fluids
Hypovolaemia is a potentially reversible cause of
cardiac arrest. Infuse fluids rapidly if hypovolaemia
is suspected. In the initial stages of resuscitation
there are no clear advantages to using colloid, so
use saline or Hartmann’s solution. Avoid dextrose,
which is redistributed away from the intravascu-
lar space rapidly and causes hyperglycaemia, which
may worsen neurological outcome after cardiac
arrest.237—244
Whether fluids should be infused routinely during
cardiac arrest is controversial. There are no pub-
lished human studies of routine fluid use compared
to no fluids during normovolaemic cardiac arrest.
Four animal studies245—248 of experimental ventric-
ular fibrillation neither support nor refute the use
of intravenous fluids routinely. In the absence of
hypovolaemia, infusion of an excessive volume of
fluid is likely to be harmful. Use intravenous fluid
to flush peripherally injected drugs into the central
circulation.
Alternative routes for drug delivery
Intraosseous route
If intravenous access cannot be established,
intraosseous delivery of resuscitation drugs will
achieve adequate plasma concentrations. Several
studies indicate that intraosseous access is safe
and effective for fluid resuscitation, drug delivery
and laboratory evaluation.78,249—255 Traditionally,
the intraosseous route is used mainly for children,
but it is also effective in adults.
Drugs given via the tracheal tube
Resuscitation drugs can also be given via the tra-
cheal tube, but the plasma concentrations achieved
using this route are variable and substantially
S64
lower than those achieved by the intravenous or
intraosseous routes.
Doses of adrenaline 3—10 times higher than when
given intravenously are required to achieve sim-
ilar plasma concentrations.79,80 During CPR, lung
perfusion is only 10—30% of the normal value,
resulting in a pulmonary adrenaline depot. When
cardiac output is restored after a high dose of
endobronchial adrenaline, prolonged reabsorption
of adrenaline from the lungs into the pulmonary
circulation may occur, causing arterial hyperten-
sion, malignant arrhythmias and recurrence of VF.80
Lidocaine and atropine can also be given via a tra-
cheal tube, but the plasma concentrations achieved
are also variable.256—258 If intravenous access is
delayed or cannot be achieved, consider obtain-
ing intraosseous access. Give drugs via the tracheal
tube if intravascular (intravenous or intraosseous)
access is delayed or cannot be achieved. There are
no benefits from endobronchial injection compared
with injection of the drug directly into the tracheal
tube.256 Dilution with water instead of 0.9% saline
may achieve better drug absorption and cause less
reduction in PaO2 .85,259
CPR techniques and devices
At best, standard manual CPR produces coronary
and cerebral perfusion that is just 30% of normal.260
Several CPR techniques and devices may improve
haemodynamics or short-term survival when used
by well-trained providers in selected cases. To date,
no adjunct has consistently been shown to be supe-
rior to conventional manual CPR. CPR techniques
include the following.
High-frequency chest compressions (HFCC)
High-frequency (>100 compressions min−1 ) manual
or mechanical chest compressions improve haemo-
dynamics but have not been shown to improve long-
term outcome.261—265
Open-chest CPR
Open-chest CPR produces better coronary perfusion
coronary pressure than standard CPR266 and may
be indicated for patients with cardiac arrest due to
trauma (see Section 7i), in the early postoperative
phase after cardiothoracic surgery267,268 (see Sec-
tion 7h) or when the chest or abdomen is already
open (transdiaphragmatic approach), for example,
in trauma surgery.
J.P. Nolan et al.
Interposed abdominal compression (IAC-CPR)
The IAC-CPR technique involves compression of
the abdomen during the relaxation phase of
chest compression.269,270 This enhances venous
return during CPR271,272 and improves ROSC
and short-term survival.273,274 One study showed
improved survival to hospital discharge with IAC-
CPR compared with standard CPR for out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest,274 but another showed no
survival advantage.275 CPR devices include the
following.
Active compression-decompression CPR
(ACD-CPR)
ACD-CPR is achieved with a hand-held device
equipped with a suction cup to lift the ante-
rior chest actively during decompression. Decreas-
ing intrathoracic pressure during the decompres-
sion phase increases venous return to the heart
and increases cardiac output and subsequent coro-
nary and cerebral perfusion pressures during the
compression phase.276—279 Results of ACD-CPR have
been mixed. In some clinical studies ACD-CPR
improved haemodynamics compared with stan-
dard CPR,173,277,279,280 but in another study it
did not.281 In three randomised studies,280,282,283
ACD-CPR improved long-term survival after out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest; however, in five other ran-
domised studies, ACD-CPR made no difference to
outcome.284—288 The efficacy of ACD-CPR may be
highly dependent on the quality and duration of
training.289
A meta-analysis of 10 trials of out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest and two of in-hospital cardiac arrest
showed no early or late survival benefit to ACD-CPR
over conventional CPR.290 Two post-mortem stud-
ies have shown more rib and sternal fractures after
ACD-CPR compared with conventional CPR,291,292
but another found no difference.293
Impedance threshold device (ITD)
The impedance threshold device (ITD) is a valve
that limits air entry into the lungs during chest
recoil between chest compressions; this decreases
intrathoracic pressure and increases venous return
to the heart. When used with a cuffed tra-
cheal tube and active compression-decompression
(ACD),294—296 the ITD is thought to act synergis-
tically to enhance venous return during active
decompression. The ITD has also been used dur-
ing conventional CPR with a tracheal tube or
facemask.297 If rescuers can maintain a tight face-
mask seal, the ITD may create the same negative
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
intrathoracic pressure as when used with a tracheal
tube.297
In two randomised studies of out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest, ACD-CPR plus the ITD improved
ROSC and 24-h survival compared with standard
CPR alone.296,298 When used during standard CPR,
the ITD increased 24-h survival after PEA out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest.297
Mechanical piston CPR
Mechanical piston devices depress the sternum
by means of a compressed gas-powered plunger
mounted on a backboard. In several studies in
animals,299,300 mechanical piston CPR improved
end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac output, cerebral
blood flow, MAP and short-term neurological out-
come. Studies in humans also document improve-
ment in end-tidal carbon dioxide and mean arterial
pressure when using mechanical piston CPR com-
pared with conventional CPR.301—303
Lund University cardiac arrest system (LUCAS)
CPR
The Lund University cardiac arrest system (LUCAS)
is a gas-driven sternal compression device that
incorporates a suction cup for active decompres-
sion. There are no published randomised human
studies comparing LUCAS-CPR with standard CPR.
A study of pigs with VF showed that LUCAS-CPR
improves haemodynamic and short-term survival
compared with standard CPR.304 The LUCAS was
also used in 20 patients, but incomplete outcome
data were reported.304 In another pig study, in com-
parison with standard CPR, LUCAS-CPR increased
cerebral blood flow and cardiac output.305 The
LUCAS enables delivery of continuous compressions
during transport and defibrillation.
Mechanical piston CPR or LUCAS CPR may be par-
ticularly useful when prolonged CPR is required;
this might include during transport to hospital or
after cardiac arrest following hypothermia306 or
poisoning.
Load-distributing band CPR or vest CPR
The load distributing band (LDB) is a cir-
cumferential chest compression device compris-
ing a pneumatically actuated constricting band
and backboard. The use of LDB CPR improves
haemodynamics.307—309 A case—control study docu-
mented improvement in survival to the emergency
department when LDB-CPR was delivered after out-
of-hospital cardiac arrest.310
S65
Phased thoracic—abdominal
compression—decompression CPR (PTACD-CPR)
Phased thoracic—abdominal compression—decom-
pression CPR combines the concepts of IAC-CPR
and ACD-CPR. It comprises a hand-held device
that alternates chest compression and abdominal
decompression with chest decompression and
abdominal compression. One randomised study of
adults in cardiac arrest documented no improve-
ment in survival from use of PTACD-CPR.311
Minimally invasive direct cardiac massage
Minimally invasive direct cardiac massage (MIDCM)
is accomplished by insertion of a small plunger-like
device through a 2—4-cm incision in the chest wall.
In one clinical study the MIDCM generated improved
blood pressure over standard CPR, but the device
caused cardiac rupture in one postoperative cardio-
vascular surgical patient.312 The plunger device is
no longer manufactured.
4f. Peri-arrest arrhythmias
Introduction
A successful strategy to reduce the mortality
and morbidity of cardiac arrest includes measures
to prevent other potentially serious arrhythmias,
and optimal treatment should they occur. Cardiac
arrhythmias are well recognised complications of
myocardial infarction. They may precede ventric-
ular fibrillation or follow successful defibrillation.
The treatment algorithms described in this section
have been designed to enable the non-specialist
ALS provider to treat the patient effectively and
safely in an emergency; for this reason, they have
been kept as simple as possible. If patients are
not acutely ill there may be several other treat-
ment options, including the use of drugs (oral or
parenteral), that will be less familiar to the non-
expert. In this situation there will be time to seek
advice from cardiologists or other doctors with the
appropriate expertise.
More comprehensive information on the
management of arrhythmias can be found at
www.escardio.org.
Principles of treatment
In all cases, give oxygen and insert an intravenous
cannula while the arrhythmia is assessed. Whenever
possible, record a 12-lead ECG; this will help deter-
mine the precise rhythm, either before treatment
S66
or retrospectively, if necessary with the help of an
expert. Correct any electrolyte abnormalities (e.g.,
K+ , Mg2+ , Ca2+ ) (Section 7a).
The assessment and treatment of all arrhyth-
mias addresses two factors: the condition of the
patient (stable versus unstable), and the nature of
the arrhythmia.
Adverse signs
The presence or absence of adverse signs or symp-
toms will dictate the appropriate treatment for
most arrhythmias. The following adverse factors
indicate a patient who is unstable because of the
arrhythmia.
1. Clinical evidence of low cardiac output. This
is seen as pallor, sweating, cold and clammy
extremities (increased sympathetic activity),
impaired consciousness (reduced cerebral blood
flow), and hypotension (e.g., systolic blood pres-
sure <90 mmHg).
2. Excessive tachycardia. Coronary blood flow
occurs predominantly during diastole. Very high
heart rates (e.g., >150 min−1 ) reduce diastole
critically, decreasing coronary blood flow and
causing myocardial ischaemia. Broad, complex
tachycardias are tolerated less well by the heart
than narrow, complex tachycardias.
3. Excessive bradycardia. This is defined as a
heart rate of <40 beats min−1 , but rates of
<60 beats min−1 may not be tolerated by
patients with poor cardiac reserve. Even a higher
heart rate may be inappropriately slow for a
patient with a low stroke-volume.
4. Heart failure. By reducing coronary artery blood
flow, arrhythmias compromise myocardial per-
formance. In acute situations this is manifested
by pulmonary oedema (failure of the left ven-
tricle) or raised jugular venous pressure, and
hepatic engorgement (failure of the right ven-
tricle).
5. Chest pain. The presence of chest pain implies
that the arrhythmia (particularly a tach-
yarrhythmia) is causing myocardial ischaemia.
This is especially important if there is underly-
ing coronary artery disease or structural heart
disease in which myocardial ischaemia is likely
to lead to further life-threatening complications
including cardiac arrest.
Treatment options
Having determined the rhythm and the presence or
absence of adverse signs, there are broadly three
options for immediate treatment:
J.P. Nolan et al.
1. anti-arrhythmic (and other) drugs
2. attempted electrical cardioversion
3. cardiac pacing
All anti-arrhythmic treatments—–physical man-
oeuvres, drugs, or electrical treatment—–can also
be pro-arrhythmic, so that clinical deterioration
may be caused by the treatment rather than
lack of effect. Furthermore, the use of multiple
anti-arrhythmic drugs or high doses of a single drug
can cause myocardial depression and hypotension.
This may cause a deterioration of the cardiac
rhythm. Anti-arrhythmic drugs are slower in effect
and less reliable than electrical cardioversion in
converting a tachycardia to sinus rhythm; thus,
drugs tend to be reserved for stable patients
without adverse signs, and electrical cardioversion
is usually the preferred treatment for the unstable
patient displaying adverse signs.
Once the arrhythmia has been treated success-
fully, repeat the 12-lead ECG to enable detection
of any underlying abnormalities that may require
long-term therapy.
Bradycardia
A bradycardia is defined strictly as a heart rate
of <60 beats min−1 . However, it is more helpful to
classify a bradycardia as absolute (<40 beats min−1 )
or relative, when the heart rate is inappropriately
slow for the haemodynamic state of the patient.
The first step in the assessment of bradycar-
dia is to determine if the patient is unstable
(Figure 4.11). The following adverse signs may indi-
cate instability:
• systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
• heart rate <40 beats min−1
• ventricular arrhythmias requiring suppression
• heart failure
If adverse signs are present, give atropine,
500 mcg, intravenously and, if necessary, repeat
every 3—5 min to a total of 3 mg. Doses of atropine
of less than 500 mcg paradoxically may cause fur-
ther slowing of the heart rate.313 In healthy vol-
unteers a dose of 3 mg produces the maximum
achievable increase in resting heart rate.314 Use
atropine cautiously in the presence of acute coro-
nary ischaemia or myocardial infarction; increased
heart rate may worsen ischaemia or increase the
zone of infarction. If a satisfactory response is
achieved with atropine, or the patient is stable,
next determine the risk of asystole, which is indi-
cated by:
• recent asystole
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S67

Figure 4.11 Bradycardia algorithm.

• Möbitz type II AV block transient and may be asymptomatic. In Möbitz type

• complete (third-degree) heart block (espe-
cially with broad QRS or initial heart rate
<40 beats min−1 )
• ventricular standstill of more than 3 s
Atrioventricular (AV) blocks are divided into first,
second, and third degrees and may be associ-
ated with multiple medications or electrolyte dis-
turbances, as well as structural problems caused
by acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis. A
first-degree AV block is defined by a prolonged P—R
interval (>0.20 s), and is usually benign. Second-
degree AV block is divided into Möbitz types I and II.
In Möbitz type I, the block is at the AV node, is often
II, the block is most often below the AV node at
the bundle of His or at the bundle branches, and is
often symptomatic, with the potential to progress
to complete AV block. Third-degree heart block is
defined by AV dissociation which may be permanent
or transient, depending on the underlying cause.
Pacing is likely to be required if there is a risk
of asystole, or if the patient is unstable and has
failed to respond satisfactorily to atropine. Under
these circumstances, the definitive treatment is
transvenous pacing. One or more of the following
interventions can be used to improve the patient’s
condition while waiting for the appropriate person-
nel and facilities:
S68
• transcutaneous pacing
• adrenaline infusion in the range of
2—10 mcg min−1 titrated to response
Other drugs that can be given for symptomatic
bradycardia include dopamine, isoprenaline and
theophylline. Consider giving intravenous glucagon
if beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers are
a potential cause of the bradycardia. Do not give
atropine to patients with cardiac transplants—–
paradoxically, it can cause a high-degree AV block
or even sinus arrest.315
Complete heart block with a narrow QRS is not
an absolute indication for pacing, because AV junc-
tional ectopic pacemakers (with a narrow QRS) may
provide a reasonable and stable heart rate.
Pacing
Transcutaneous pacing. Initiate transcutaneous
pacing immediately if there is no response to
atropine, if atropine is unlikely to be effective or if
the patient is severely symptomatic, particularly if
there is high-degree block (Möbitz Type II second- or
Figure 4.12 Tachycardia algorithm.
J.P. Nolan et al.
third-degree block). Transcutaneous pacing can be
painful and may fail to produce effective mechani-
cal capture. Verify mechanical capture and reassess
the patient’s condition. Use analgesia and sedation
to control pain, and attempt to identify the cause
of the bradyarrhythmia.
Fist pacing. If atropine is ineffective and transcu-
taneous pacing is not immediately available, fist
pacing can be attempted while waiting for pacing
equipment316—318 : give serial rhythmic blows with
the closed fist over the left lower edge of the ster-
num to pace the heart at a physiological rate of
50—70 beats min−1 .
Tachycardias
Previous ERC guidelines have included three sepa-
rate tachycardia algorithms: broad-complex tachy-
cardia, narrow-complex tachycardia and atrial fib-
rillation. In the peri-arrest setting, many treatment
principles are common to all the tachycardias; for
this reason, they have been combined into a single
tachycardia algorithm (Figure 4.12).
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
If the patient is unstable and deteriorating,
with signs and symptoms caused by the tachycar-
dia (e.g., impaired conscious level, chest pain,
heart failure, hypotension or other signs of shock),
attempt synchronised cardioversion immediately.
In patients with otherwise normal hearts, serious
signs and symptoms are uncommon if the ventricu-
lar rate is <150 beats min−1 . Patients with impaired
cardiac function or significant comorbidity may be
symptomatic and unstable at lower heart rates. If
cardioversion fails to restore sinus rhythm and the
patient remains unstable, give amiodarone 300 mg
intravenously over 10—20 min and re-attempt elec-
trical cardioversion. The loading dose of amio-
darone can be followed by an infusion of 900 mg
over 24 h. Serial DC shocks are not appropriate for
recurrent (within hours or days) paroxysms (self-
terminating episodes) of atrial fibrillation. This is
relatively common in critically ill patients who
may have ongoing precipitating factors causing the
arrhythmia (e.g., metabolic disturbance, sepsis).
Cardioversion does not prevent subsequent arrhyth-
mias. If there are recurrent episodes, treat them
with drugs.
Synchronised electrical cardioversion
If electrical cardioversion is used to convert atrial
or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the shock must be
synchronised with the R wave of the ECG rather
than with the T wave. By avoiding the relative
refractory period in this way, the risk of induc-
ing ventricular fibrillation is minimised. Conscious
patients must be anaesthetised or sedated before
synchronised cardioversion is attempted. For a
broad-complex tachycardia and AF, start with 200-J
monophasic or 120—150 J biphasic and increase in
increments if this fails (see Section 3). Atrial flutter
and paroxysmal SVT will often convert with lower
energies: start with 100-J monophasic or 70—120-J
biphasic.
If the patient with tachycardia is stable (no seri-
ous signs or symptoms caused by the tachycardia)
and is not deteriorating, there is time to evaluate
the rhythm using the 12-lead ECG and determine
treatment options. The ALS provider may not have
the expertise to diagnose the tachycardia precisely,
but should be capable of differentiating between
sinus tachycardia, narrow-complex SVT and broad-
complex tachycardia. If the patient is stable there
is normally time to consult an expert. If the patient
becomes unstable, proceed immediately to syn-
chronised electrical cardioversion. Management of
patients with significant comorbid conditions and
symptomatic tachycardia requires treatment of the
comorbid conditions.
S69
Broad-complex tachycardia
In broad-complex tachycardias the QRS complexes
are >0.12 s and are usually ventricular in ori-
gin. Although broad-complex tachycardias may be
caused by supraventricular rhythms with aberrant
conduction, in the unstable patient in the peri-
arrest context assume they are ventricular in origin.
In the stable patient with broad-complex tachycar-
dia, the next step is to determine if the rhythm is
regular or irregular.
Regular broad complex tachycardia. A regular
broad-complex tachycardia is likely to be ventric-
ular tachycardia or SVT with bundle branch block.
Stable ventricular tachycardia can be treated with
amiodarone 300 mg intravenously over 20—60 min
followed by an infusion of 900 mg over 24 h. If the
broad-complex regular tachycardia is thought to be
SVT with bundle branch block, give adenosine, using
the strategy indicated for narrow-complex tachy-
cardia (below).
Irregular broad complex tachycardia. Irregular
broad complex tachycardia is most likely to
be AF with bundle branch block, but careful
examination of a 12-lead ECG (if necessary by
an expert) may enable confident identification
of the rhythm. Another possible cause is AF
with ventricular pre-excitation (in patients with
Wolff—Parkinson—White (WPW) syndrome). There
is more variation in the appearance and width of the
QRS complexes than in AF with bundle branch block.
A third possible cause is polymorphic VT (e.g., tor-
sade de pointes), but polymorphic VT is relatively
unlikely to be present without adverse features.
Seek expert help with the assessment and treat-
ment of irregular broad-complex tachyarrhythmia.
If treating AF with bundle branch block, treat as for
AF (see below). If pre-excited AF (or atrial flutter) is
suspected, avoid adenosine, digoxin, verapamil and
diltiazem. These drugs block the AV node and cause
a relative increase in pre-excitation. Electrical car-
dioversion is usually the safest treatment option.
Treat torsades de pointes VT immediately by
stopping all drugs known to prolong QT inter-
val. Correct electrolyte abnormalities, especially
hypokalaemia. Give magnesium sulphate, 2 g, intra-
venously over 10 min.319,320 Obtain expert help, as
other treatment (e.g., overdrive pacing) may be
indicated to prevent relapse once the arrhythmia
has been corrected. If adverse features develop
(which is usual), arrange immediate synchronised
cardioversion. If the patient becomes pulseless,
attempt defibrillation immediately (cardiac arrest
algorithm).
S70
Narrow-complex tachycardia
Regular narrow-complex tachycardias include:
• sinus tachycardia
• AV nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT, the com-
monest type of SVT)
• AV re-entry tachycardia (AVRT (due to WPW syn-
drome))
• atrial flutter with regular AV conduction (usually
2:1)
Irregular narrow-complex tachycardia is most
commonly AF or sometimes atrial flutter with vari-
able AV conduction (‘variable block’).
Regular narrow-complex tachycardia
Sinus tachycardia. Sinus tachycardia is a com-
mon physiological response to a stimulus such as
exercise or anxiety. In a sick patient it may be seen
in response to many stimuli, such as pain, fever,
anaemia, blood loss and heart failure. Treatment
is almost always directed at the underlying cause;
trying to slow sinus tachycardia that has occurred
in response to most of these situations will make
the situation worse.
AVNRT and AVRT (paroxysmal SVT). AVNRT is the
commonest type of paroxysmal SVT, often seen in
people without any other form of heart disease
and is relatively uncommon in a peri-arrest setting.
It causes a regular narrow-complex tachycardia,
often with no clearly visible atrial activity on the
ECG, with heart rates usually well above the typical
range of sinus rates at rest (60—120 beats min−1 ).
It is usually benign, unless there is additional co-
incidental structural heart disease or coronary dis-
ease, but may cause symptoms that the patient
finds frightening.
AV re-entry tachycardia (AVRT) is seen in patients
with the WPW syndrome and is also usually benign
unless there happens to be additional structural
heart disease. The common type of AVRT is a regu-
lar narrow-complex tachycardia, also often having
no visible atrial activity on the ECG.
Atrial flutter with regular AV conduction (often
2:1 block). Atrial flutter with regular AV conduc-
tion (often 2:1 block) produces a regular narrow-
complex tachycardia in which it may be difficult
to see atrial activity and identify flutter waves
with confidence, so it may be indistinguishable ini-
tially from AVNRT and AVRT. When atrial flutter
with 2:1 block or even 1:1 conduction is accompa-
nied by bundle branch block, it produces a regular
broad-complex tachycardia that will usually be very
difficult to distinguish from VT; treatment of this
rhythm as if it were VT will usually be effective,
J.P. Nolan et al.
or will slow the ventricular response enabling iden-
tification of the rhythm. Most typical atrial flutter
has an atrial rate of about 300 beats min−1 , so atrial
flutter with 2:1 block tends to produce a tachy-
cardia of about 150 beats min−1 . Much faster rates
(170 beats min−1 or more) are unlikely to be due to
atrial flutter with 2:1 block.
Treatment of regular narrow complex tachycar-
dia. If the patient is unstable with adverse fea-
tures caused by the arrhythmia, attempt synchro-
nised electrical cardioversion. It is reasonable to
give adenosine to an unstable patient with a regu-
lar narrow-complex tachycardia while preparations
are made for synchronised cardioversion; however,
do not delay electrical cardioversion if the adeno-
sine fails to restore sinus rhythm. In the absence of
adverse features, proceed as follows.
• Start with vagal manoeuvres. Carotid sinus mas-
sage or the Valsalva manoeuvre will terminate
up to a quarter of episodes of paroxysmal SVT.
A Valsalva manoeuvre (forced expiration against
a closed glottis) in the supine position may be
the most effective technique. A practical way
of achieving this without protracted explana-
tion is to ask the patient to blow into a 20-
ml syringe with enough force to push back the
plunger. Avoid carotid massage if a carotid bruit
is present; rupture of an atheromatous plaque
could cause cerebral embolism and stroke. In the
context of acute ischaemia or digitalis toxicity,
sudden bradycardia may trigger VF. Record an
ECG (preferably multi-lead) during each manoeu-
vre. If the rhythm is atrial flutter, slowing of the
ventricular response will often occur and demon-
strate flutter waves.
• If the arrhythmia persists and is not atrial flutter,
use adenosine. Give 6 mg as a rapid intravenous
bolus. Record an ECG (preferably multi-lead) dur-
ing each injection. If the ventricular rate slows
transiently but the arrhythmia then persists, look
for atrial activity such as atrial flutter or other
atrial tachycardia and treat accordingly. If there
is no response to adenosine 6 mg, give a 12-mg
bolus; if there is no response, give one further
12 mg-bolus.
• Successful termination of a tachyarrhythmia by
vagal manoeuvres or adenosine indicates that
it was almost certainly AVNRT or AVRT. Monitor
the patients for further rhythm abnormalities.
Treat recurrence either with further adenosine or
with a longer-acting drug with AV nodal-blocking
action (e.g., diltiazem or beta-blocker).
• Vagal manoeuvres or adenosine will terminate
almost all AVNRT or AVRT within seconds. Failure
to terminate a regular narrow-complex tachycar-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
dia with adenosine suggests an atrial tachycardia
such as atrial flutter.
• If adenosine is contraindicated or fails to ter-
minate a regular narrow-complex tachycardia
without demonstrating that it is atrial flutter,
give a calcium channel blocker (e.g., verapamil
2.5—5 mg intravenously over 2 min).
Irregular narrow-complex tachycardia
An irregular narrow-complex tachycardia is most
likely to be AF with an uncontrolled ventricular
response or, less commonly, atrial flutter with vari-
able AV block. Record a 12-lead ECG to identify
the rhythm. If the patient is unstable with adverse
features caused by the arrhythmia, attempt syn-
chronised electrical cardioversion.
If there are no adverse features, treatment
options include:
• rate control by drug therapy
• rhythm control using drugs to encourage chemi-
cal cardioversion
• rhythm control by electrical cardioversion
• treatment to prevent complications (e.g., anti-
coagulation)
Obtain expert help to determine the most appro-
priate treatment for the individual patient. The
longer a patient remains in AF, the greater is
the likelihood of atrial clot developing. In gen-
eral, patients who have been in AF for more than
48 h should not be treated by cardioversion (elec-
trical or chemical) until they have received full
anticoagulation or absence of atrial clot has been
shown by transoesophageal echocardiography. If
the aim is to control heart rate, options include
a beta-blocker,321,322 digoxin, diltiazem,323,324
magnesium325,326 or combinations of these.
If the duration of AF is less than 48 h and rhythm
control is considered appropriate, this may be
attempted using amiodarone (300 mg intravenously
over 20—60 min followed by 900 mg over 24 h). Ibu-
tilide or flecainide can also be given for rhythm con-
trol, but expert advice should be obtained before
using these drugs for this purpose. Electrical car-
dioversion remains an option in this setting and will
restore sinus rhythm in more patients than chemi-
cal cardioversion.
Seek expert help if any patient with AF is known
or found to have ventricular pre-excitation (WPW
syndrome). Avoid using adenosine, diltiazem, vera-
pamil or digoxin to patients with pre-excited AF or
atrial flutter, as these drugs block the AV node and
cause a relative increase in pre-excitation.
S71
Antiarrhythmic drugs
Adenosine
Adenosine is a naturally occurring purine
nucleotide. It slows transmission across the
AV node but has little effect on other myocardial
cells or conduction pathways. It is highly effective
for terminating paroxysmal SVT with re-entrant
circuits that include the AV node (AVNRT). In
other narrow-complex tachycardias, adenosine will
reveal the underlying atrial rhythms by slowing the
ventricular response. It has an extremely short half-
life of 10—15 s and, therefore, is given as a rapid
bolus into a fast running intravenous infusion or fol-
lowed by a saline flush. The smallest dose likely to
be effective is 6 mg (which is outside some current
licences for an initial dose) and, if unsuccessful
this can be followed with up to two doses each of
12 mg every 1—2 min. Patients should be warned
of transient unpleasant side effects, in particular
nausea, flushing, and chest discomfort.327 Adeno-
sine is not available in some European countries,
but adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is an alternative.
In a few European countries neither preparation
may be available; verapamil is probably the next
best choice. Theophylline and related compounds
block the effect of adenosine. Patients receiving
dipyridamole or carbamazepine, or with dener-
vated (transplanted) hearts, display a markedly
exaggerated effect that may be hazardous. In
these patients, or if injected into a central vein,
reduce the initial dose of adenosine to 3 mg. In the
presence of WPW syndrome, blockage of conduc-
tion across the AV node by adenosine may promote
conduction across an accessory pathway. In the
presence of supraventricular arrhythmias this may
cause a dangerously rapid ventricular response. In
the presence of WPW syndrome, rarely, adenosine
may precipitate atrial fibrillation associated with a
dangerously rapid ventricular response.
Amiodarone
Intravenous amiodarone has effects on sodium,
potassium and calcium channels as well as alpha-
and beta-adrenergic blocking properties. Indica-
tions for intravenous amiodarone include:
• control of haemodynamically stable VT, polymor-
phic VT and wide-complex tachycardia of uncer-
tain origin
• paroxysmal SVT uncontrolled by adenosine, vagal
manoeuvres or AV nodal blockade
• to control rapid ventricular rate due to accessory
pathway conduction in pre-excited atrial arrhyth-
mias
S72
Give amiodarone, 300 mg intravenously, over
10—60 min depending on the circumstances and
haemodynamic stability of the patient. This load-
ing dose is followed by an infusion of 900 mg over
24 h. Additional infusions of 150 mg can be repeated
as necessary for recurrent or resistant arrhyth-
mias to a maximum manufacturer-recommended
total daily dose of 2 g (this maximum licensed dose
varies between countries). In patients known to
have severely impaired heart function, intravenous
amiodarone is preferable to other anti-arrhythmic
drugs for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Major
adverse effects from amiodarone are hypotension
and bradycardia, which can be prevented by slow-
ing the rate of drug infusion. The hypotension asso-
ciated with amiodarone is caused by vasoactive sol-
vents (Polysorbate 80 and benzyl alcohol). A new
aqueous formulation of amiodarone does not con-
tain these solvents and causes no more hypotension
than lidocaine.198 Whenever possible, intravenous
amiodarone should be given via a central venous
catheter; it causes thrombophlebitis when infused
into a peripheral vein. In an emergency it should be
injected into a large peripheral vein.
Calcium channel blockers: verapamil and
diltiazem
Verapamil and diltiazem are calcium channel block-
ing drugs that slow conduction and increase refrac-
toriness in the AV node. Intravenous diltiazem is
not available in some countries. These actions may
terminate re-entrant arrhythmias and control ven-
tricular response rate in patients with a variety of
atrial tachycardias. Indications include:
• stable regular narrow-complex tachycardias
uncontrolled or unconverted by adenosine or
vagal manoeuvres
• to control ventricular rate in patients with AF or
atrial flutter and preserved ventricular function
when the duration of the arrhythmia is less than
48 h
The initial dose of verapamil is 2.5—5 mg intra-
venously given over 2 min. In the absence of a ther-
apeutic response or drug-induced adverse event,
give repeated doses of 5—10 mg every 15—30 min
to a maximum of 20 mg. Verapamil should be given
only to patients with narrow-complex paroxysmal
SVT or arrhythmias known with certainty to be of
supraventricular origin.
Diltiazem at a dose of 250 mcg kg−1 , followed by
a second dose of 350 mcg kg−1 , is as effective as
verapamil. Verapamil and, to a lesser extent, dil-
tiazem may decrease myocardial contractility and
critically reduce cardiac output in patients with
J.P. Nolan et al.
severe LV dysfunction. For the reasons stated under
adenosine (above), calcium channel blockers are
considered harmful when given to patients with
AF or atrial flutter associated with known pre-
excitation (WPW) syndrome.
Beta-adrenergic blockers
Beta-blocking drugs (atenolol, metoprolol,
labetalol (alpha- and beta-blocking effects),
propranolol, esmolol) reduce the effects of cir-
culating catecholamines and decrease heart rate
and blood pressure. They also have cardiopro-
tective effects for patients with acute coronary
syndromes. Beta-blockers are indicated for the
following tachycardias:
• narrow-complex regular tachycardias uncon-
trolled by vagal manoeuvres and adenosine in the
patient with preserved ventricular function
• to control rate in AF and atrial flutter when ven-
tricular function is preserved
The intravenous dose of atenolol (beta1 ) is
5 mg given over 5 min, repeated if necessary after
10 min. Metoprolol (beta1 ) is given in doses of
2—5 mg at 5-min intervals to a total of 15 mg. Pro-
pranolol (beta1 and beta2 effects), 100 mcg kg−1 , is
given slowly in three equal doses at 2—3-min inter-
vals.
Intravenous esmolol is a short-acting (half-
life of 2—9 min) beta1 -selective beta-blocker. It
is given as an intravenous loading dose of
500 mcg kg−1 over 1 min, followed by an infusion of
50—200 mcg kg−1 min−1 .
Side effects of beta-blockade include bradycar-
dias, AV conduction delays and hypotension. Con-
traindications to the use of beta-adrenergic block-
ing agents include second- or third-degree heart
block, hypotension, severe congestive heart failure
and lung disease associated with bronchospasm.
Magnesium
Magnesium can be given for control of ventricu-
lar rate in atrial fibrillation.326,328—330 Give magne-
sium sulphate 2 g (8 mmol) over 10 min. This can be
repeated once if necessary.
4g. Post-resuscitation care
Introduction
ROSC is the just the first step toward the goal
of complete recovery from cardiac arrest. Inter-
ventions in the post-resuscitation period are likely
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
to influence the final outcome significantly,237,331
yet there are relatively few data relating to this
phase. Of 22,105 patients admitted to intensive
care units in the UK after cardiac arrest, 9974 (45%)
survived to leave intensive care and 6353 (30%)
survived to hospital discharge (data from Intensive
Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC),
London, December 1995 to October 2004). To return
the patient to a state of normal cerebral func-
tion with no neurological deficit, a stable cardiac
rhythm and normal haemodynamic function, fur-
ther resuscitation tailored to each patient’s individ-
ual needs is required. The post-resuscitation phase
starts at the location where ROSC is achieved but,
once stabilised, the patient is transferred to the
most appropriate high-care area (e.g., intensive
care unit, coronary care unit) for continued mon-
itoring and treatment.
Airway and breathing
Patients who have had a brief period of car-
diac arrest responding immediately to appropri-
ate treatment may achieve an immediate return
of normal cerebral function. These patients do
not require tracheal intubation and ventilation but
should be given oxygen via a facemask. Hypoxia
and hypercarbia both increase the likelihood of a
further cardiac arrest and may contribute to sec-
ondary brain injury. Consider tracheal intubation,
sedation and controlled ventilation in any patient
with obtunded cerebral function. Ensure the tra-
cheal tube is positioned correctly well above the
carina. Hypocarbia causes cerebral vasoconstric-
tion and a decreased cerebral blood flow.332 After
cardiac arrest, hypocapnia induced by hyperventi-
lation causes cerebral ischaemia.333—336 There are
no data to support the targeting of a specific arte-
rial PCO2 after resuscitation from cardiac arrest,
but it is reasonable to adjust ventilation to achieve
normocarbia and to monitor this using the end-
tidal PCO2 and arterial blood gas values. Adjust
the inspired oxygen concentrations to achieve ade-
quate arterial oxygen saturation.
Insert a gastric tube to decompress the stom-
ach; gastric distension caused by mouth-to-mouth
or bag-mask-valve ventilation will splint the
diaphragm and impair ventilation. Avoid coughing;
this will increase intracranial pressure and may
cause transient hypoxaemia. Give adequate doses
of sedative and, if absolutely necessary, give a neu-
romuscular blocking drug. Obtain a chest radio-
graph to check the position of the tracheal tube
and central venous lines, etc., assess for pulmonary
oedema and to detect complications from CPR such
as a pneumothorax associated with rib fractures.
S73
Circulation
If there is evidence of coronary occlusion, consider
the need for immediate revascularisation by throm-
bolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention (see
acute coronary syndromes).
Haemodynamic instability is common after car-
diac arrest and manifests as hypotension, low
cardiac index and arrhythmias.337 This post-
resuscitation myocardial dysfunction (or myocar-
dial stunning) is usually transient and often reverses
within 24—48 h.338 The post-resuscitation period
is associated with marked elevations in plasma
cytokine concentrations, manifesting as a sepsis-
like syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction.339
Infusion of fluids may be required to increase
right heart filling pressures or, conversely, diuretics
and vasodilators may be needed to treat left ven-
tricular failure. In the ICU an arterial line for contin-
uous blood pressure monitoring is essential, and the
use of a non-invasive or invasive (pulmonary artery
catheter) cardiac output monitor may be helpful.
There are very few randomised trials evaluating the
role of blood pressure on the outcome after car-
diac arrest. One randomised study demonstrated
no difference in the neurological outcome among
patients randomised to a mean arterial blood pres-
sure of >100 mmHg versus ≤100 mmHg 5 min after
ROSC; however, good functional recovery was asso-
ciated with a higher blood pressure during the first
2 h after ROSC.340 In the absence of definitive data,
target the mean arterial blood pressure to achieve
an adequate urine output, taking into consideration
the patient’s normal blood pressure.
Immediately after a cardiac arrest there is
typically a period of hyperkalaemia. Subse-
quent endogenous catecholamine release promotes
intracellular transportation of potassium, causing
hypokalaemia. Hypokalaemia may predispose to
ventricular arrhythmias. Give potassium to main-
tain the serum potassium concentration between
4.0 and 4.5 mmol l−1 .
Disability (optimising neurological recovery)
Cerebral perfusion
Immediately after ROSC there is a period of cere-
bral hyperaemia.341 After 15—30 min of reperfu-
sion, however, global cerebral blood flow decreases
and there is generalised hypoperfusion. Normal
cerebral autoregulation is lost, leaving cerebral
perfusion dependent on mean arterial pressure.
Under these circumstances, hypotension will com-
promise cerebral blood flow severely and will com-
pound any neurological injury. Thus, after ROSC,
S74
maintain mean arterial pressure at the patient’s
normal level.
Sedation
Although it has been common practice to sedate
and ventilate patients for up to 24 h after ROSC,
there are no data to support a defined period of
ventilation, sedation and neuromuscular blockade
after cardiac arrest. The duration of sedation and
ventilation may be influenced by the use of thera-
peutic hypothermia (see below). There are no data
to indicate whether or not the choice of sedation
influences outcome, but short-acting drugs (e.g.,
propofol, alfentanil, remifentanil) will enable ear-
lier neurological assessment. There is an increased
incidence of pneumonia when sedation is prolonged
beyond 48 h after prehospital or in-hospital cardiac
arrest.342
Control of seizures
Seizures and/or myoclonus occur in 5—15% of
adult patients who achieve ROSC, and in approx-
imately 40% of those who remain comatose.343
Seizures increase cerebral metabolism by up to
four-fold. Prolonged seizure activity may cause
cerebral injury, and should be controlled with ben-
zodiazepines, phenytoin, propofol or a barbiturate.
Each of these drugs can cause hypotension, and
this must be treated appropriately. Seizures and
myoclonus per se are not related significantly to
outcome, but status epilepticus and, in particu-
lar, status myoclonus are associated with a poor
outcome.343,344
Temperature control
Treatment of hyperpyrexia. A period of hyper-
thermia (hyperpyrexia) is common in the first 48 h
after cardiac arrest.345—347 The risk of a poor neuro-
logical outcome increases for each degree of body
temperature >37 ◦ C.348 Antipyretics and/or phys-
ical cooling methods decrease infarct volumes in
animal models of global ischaemia.349,350 Treat any
hyperthermia occurring in the first 72 h after car-
diac arrest with antipyretics or active cooling.
Therapeutic hypothermia. Mild therapeutic
hypothermia is thought to suppress many of
the chemical reactions associated with reperfu-
sion injury. These reactions include free-radical
production, excitatory amino acid release, and
calcium shifts, which can in turn lead to mito-
chondrial damage and apoptosis (programmed
cell death).351—353 Two randomised clinical trials
J.P. Nolan et al.
showed improved outcome in adults remaining
comatose after initial resuscitation from out-
of-hospital VF cardiac arrest, who were cooled
within minutes to hours after ROSC.354,355 The
subjects were cooled to 32—34 ◦ C for 12—24 h. One
study documented improved metabolic endpoints
(lactate and O2 extraction) when comatose adult
patients were cooled after ROSC from out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest in which the initial rhythm
was PEA/asystole.356 A small study showed ben-
efit after therapeutic hypothermia in comatose
survivors of non-VF arrest.357
External and/or internal cooling techniques can
be used to initiate cooling.354—356,358—361 An infu-
sion of 30 mg kg−1 of 4 ◦ C-saline decreases core
temperature by 1.5 ◦ C.358,359,361,362 Intravascular
cooling enables more precise control of core tem-
perature than external methods, but it is unknown
whether this improves outcome.360,363—365
Complications of mild therapeutic hypother-
mia include increased infection, cardiovascular
instability, coagulopathy, hyperglycaemia and elec-
trolyte abnormalities such as hypophosphataemia
and hypomagnesaemia.366,367
Unconscious adult patients with spontaneous cir-
culation after out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest
should be cooled to 32—34 ◦ C. Cooling should be
started as soon as possible and continued for at
least 12—24 h.368—374 Induced hypothermia might
also benefit unconscious adult patients with spon-
taneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest from a non-shockable rhythm, or cardiac
arrest in hospital. Treat shivering by ensuring ade-
quate sedation and giving neuromuscular block-
ing drugs. Bolus doses of neuromuscular block-
ers are usually adequate, but infusions are nec-
essary occasionally. Rewarm the patient slowly
(0.25—0.5 ◦ C h−1 ) and avoid hyperthermia. The
optimum target temperature, rate of cooling, dura-
tion of hypothermia and rate of rewarming have yet
to be determined; further studies are essential.
Blood glucose control
There is a strong association between high blood
glucose after resuscitation from cardiac arrest
and poor neurological outcome.237—244 Persistent
hyperglycaemia after stroke is also associated
with a worse neurological outcome.375—378 Tight
control of blood glucose (4.4—6.1 mmol l−1 or
80—110 mg dl−1 ) using insulin reduces hospital mor-
tality in critically ill adults,379,380 but this has not
been demonstrated in post-cardiac arrest patients
specifically. The benefit is thought to result from
the strict glycaemic control rather than the dose
of insulin infused.381 One rat study has shown
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
that glucose plus insulin improves cerebral out-
come after asphyxial cardiac arrest.382 There are
no randomised controlled human trials of glucose
control after cardiac arrest. The optimal blood glu-
cose target in critically ill patients has not been
determined. Comatose patients are at particular
risk from unrecognised hypoglycaemia, and the risk
of this complication occurring increases as the tar-
get blood glucose concentration is lowered.
In common with all critically ill patients, patients
admitted to a critical care environment after car-
diac arrest should have their blood glucose moni-
tored frequently and hyperglycaemia treated with
an insulin infusion. The blood glucose concentration
that triggers insulin therapy, and the target range
of blood glucose concentrations, should be deter-
mined by local policy. There is a need for studies of
glucose control after cardiac arrest.
Prognostication
Once a heart has been resuscitated to a stable
rhythm and cardiac output, the organ that influ-
ences an individual’s survival most significantly is
the brain. Two thirds of those dying after admission
to ICU following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest die
from neurological injury.383 A quarter of those dying
after admission to ICU following in-hospital cardiac
arrest die from neurological injury. A means of pre-
dicting neurological outcome that can be applied
to individual patients immediately after ROSC is
required. Such a test of prognosis must have 100%
specificity.
Clinical tests
There are no neurological signs that can predict
outcome in the first hours after ROSC. By 3 days
after the onset of coma relating to cardiac arrest,
50% of patients with no chance of ultimate recovery
have died. In the remaining patients, the absence
of pupil light reflexes on day 3 and an absent motor
response to pain on day 3 are both independently
predictive of a poor outcome (death or vegetative
state) with very high specificity.384—386
Biochemical tests
Measurement of serum neuron-specific eno-
lase (NSE) and protein S-100b may be useful
in determining the outcome of a cardiac
arrest.237,243,244,387—399 However, the 95% con-
fidence interval (CI) in the trials undertaken to
date is wide, and in many of the studies return
to consciousness (without comment on level of
function) was considered a ‘‘good’’ outcome. The
S75
only meta-analysis to look at this topic estimated
that to obtain 95% CI with 5% false-positive rate
would require a study population of approximately
600 patients.400 No study this large has been
conducted, and these biochemical tests remain
unreliable for predicting outcome in individual
cases.
Electrophysiological tests
Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in
normothermic patients, comatose for at least 72 h
after cardiac arrest, predict poor outcome with
100% specificity.384 Bilateral absence of the N20
component of the evoked potentials in comatose
patients with coma of hypoxic-anoxic origin is uni-
formly fatal. When recorded at least 24—48 h after
ROSC, the electroencephalogram (EEG), provides
limited prognostic information.401—413 A normal or
grossly abnormal EEG predicts outcome reliably, but
an EEG between these extremes is unreliable for
prognostication.
References
1. Gwinnutt CL, Columb M, Harris R. Outcome after cardiac
arrest in adults in UK hospitals: effect of the 1997 guide-
lines. Resuscitation 2000;47:125—35.
2. Peberdy MA, Kaye W, Ornato JP, et al. Cardiopulmonary
resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720
cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopul-
monary Resuscitation. Resuscitation 2003;58:297—308.
3. Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlackonikolis I, et al. Inci-
dence, location and reasons for avoidable in-hospital car-
diac arrest in a district general hospital. Resuscitation
2002;54:115—23.
4. Kause J, Smith G, Prytherch D, Parr M, Flabouris A, Hill-
man K. A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests,
deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Aus-
tralia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom—–the
ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation 2004;62:275—82.
5. Herlitz J, Bang A, Aune S, Ekstrom L, Lundstrom G, Holm-
berg S. Characteristics and outcome among patients suf-
fering in-hospital cardiac arrest in monitored and non-
monitored areas. Resuscitation 2001;48:125—35.
6. Franklin C, Mathew J. Developing strategies to prevent
inhospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians
and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med
1994;22:244—7.
7. McQuillan P, Pilkington S, Allan A, et al. Confidential inquiry
into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ
1998;316:1853—8.
8. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and
Death. An Acute Problem? London, National Confidential
Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death, 2005.
9. Cashman JN. In-hospital cardiac arrest: what happens to
the false arrests? Resuscitation 2002;53:271—6.
10. Smith GB, Poplett N. Knowledge of aspects of acute care
in trainee doctors. Postgrad Med J 2002;78:335—8.
11. Meek T. New house officers’ knowledge of resuscitation,
fluid balance and analgesia. Anaesthesia 2000;55:1128—9.
S76
12. Gould TH, Upton PM, Collins P. A survey of the intended
management of acute postoperative pain by newly quali-
fied doctors in the south west region of England in August
1992. Anaesthesia 1994;49:807—10.
13. Jackson E, Warner J. How much do doctors know about
consent and capacity? J R Soc Med 2002;95:601—3.
14. Kruger PS, Longden PJ. A study of a hospital staff’s
knowledge of pulse oximetry. Anaesth Intensive Care
1997;25:38—41.
15. Wheeler DW, Remoundos DD, Whittlestone KD, et al.
Doctors’ confusion over ratios and percentages in drug
solutions: the case for standard labelling. J R Soc Med
2004;97:380—3.
16. Perkins GD, Stephenson B, Hulme J, Monsieurs KG. Birming-
ham assessment of breathing study (BABS). Resuscitation
2005;64:109—13.
17. Goldacre MJ, Lambert T, Evans J, Turner G. Preregistra-
tion house officers’ views on whether their experience at
medical school prepared them well for their jobs: national
questionnaire survey. BMJ 2003;326:1011—2.
18. Thwaites BC, Shankar S, Niblett D, Saunders J. Can consul-
tants resuscitate? J R Coll Physicians Lond 1992;26:265—7.
19. Saravanan P, Soar J. A survey of resuscitation training needs
of senior anaesthetists. Resuscitation 2005;64:93—6.
20. Featherstone P, Smith GB, Linnell M, Easton S, Osgood VM.
Impact of a one-day inter-professional course (ALERTTM )
on attitudes and confidence in managing critically ill adult
patients. Resuscitation 2005;65:329—36.
21. Harrison GA, Jacques TC, Kilborn G, McLaws ML. The preva-
lence of recordings of the signs of critical conditions and
emergency responses in hospital wards—–the SOCCER study.
Resuscitation 2005;65:149—57.
22. Buist M, Bernard S, Nguyen TV, Moore G, Anderson J. Asso-
ciation between clinically abnormal observations and sub-
sequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study. Resus-
citation 2004;62:137—41.
23. Goldhill DR, Worthington L, Mulcahy A, Tarling M, Sumner
A. The patient-at-risk team: identifying and managing seri-
ously ill ward patients. Anaesthesia 1999;54:853—60.
24. Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlachonikolis IG, Payne S, Castle
N. The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and
formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emer-
gency team. Resuscitation 2002;54:125—31.
25. Subbe CP, Davies RG, Williams E, Rutherford P, Gemmell L.
Effect of introducing the Modified Early Warning score on
clinical outcomes, cardio-pulmonary arrests and intensive
care utilisation in acute medical admissions. Anaesthesia
2003;58:797—802.
26. Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman KM, Daffurn K. The Medical Emer-
gency Team. Anaesth Intensive Care 1995;23:183—6.
27. Cuthbertson BH. Outreach critical care—–cash for no ques-
tions? Br J Anaesth 2003;90:4—6.
28. Parr M. Critical care outreach: some answers, more ques-
tions. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1261—2.
29. Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in
early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpa-
tients. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:882—4.
30. Subbe CP, Williams EM, Gemmell LW. Are medical emer-
gency teams picking up enough patients with increased
respiratory rate? Crit Care Med 2004;32:1983—4.
31. McBride J, Knight D, Piper J, Smith GB. Long-term effect
of introducing an early warning score on respiratory rate
charting on general wards. Resuscitation 2005;65:41—4.
32. Carberry M. Implementing the modified early warning sys-
tem: our experiences. Nurs Crit Care 2002;7:220—6.
33. Sandroni C, Ferro G, Santangelo S, et al. In-hospital car-
diac arrest: survival depends mainly on the effective-
J.P. Nolan et al.
ness of the emergency response. Resuscitation 2004;62:
291—7.
34. Soar J, McKay U. A revised role for the hospital cardiac
arrest team? Resuscitation 1998;38:145—9.
35. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, et al. A prospective
before-and-after trial of a medical emergency team. Med
J Aust 2003;179:283—7.
36. Buist MD, Moore GE, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson
JN, Nguyen TV. Effects of a medical emergency team
on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unex-
pected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ
2002;324:387—90.
37. Parr MJ, Hadfield JH, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Hillman K. The
Medical Emergency Team: 12 month analysis of reasons for
activation, immediate outcome and not-for-resuscitation
orders. Resuscitation 2001;50:39—44.
38. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Uchino S, et al. Prospective con-
trolled trial of effect of medical emergency team on post-
operative morbidity and mortality rates. Crit Care Med
2004;32:916—21.
39. Kenward G, Castle N, Hodgetts T, Shaikh L. Evaluation of a
medical emergency team one year after implementation.
Resuscitation 2004;61:257—63.
40. Jones D, Bates S, Warrillow S, et al. Circadian pattern of
activation of the medical emergency team in a teaching
hospital. Crit Care 2005;9:R303—6.
41. The MERIT study investigators. Introduction of the medi-
cal emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised
controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2091—7.
42. Critical care outreach 2003: progress in developing ser-
vices. The National Outreach Report 2003. London, Depart-
ment of Health and National Health Service Modernisation
Agency; 2003.
43. Ball C, Kirkby M, Williams S. Effect of the critical care out-
reach team on patient survival to discharge from hospital
and readmission to critical care: non-randomised popula-
tion based study. BMJ 2003;327:1014.
44. Priestley G, Watson W, Rashidian A, et al. Introducing Crit-
ical Care Outreach: a ward-randomised trial of phased
introduction in a general hospital. Intensive Care Med
2004;30:1398—404.
45. Story DA, Shelton AC, Poustie SJ, Colin-Thome NJ, McNi-
col PL. The effect of critical care outreach on post-
operative serious adverse events. Anaesthesia 2004;59:
762—6.
46. Szalados JE. Critical care teams managing floor patients:
the continuing evolution of hospitals into intensive care
units? Crit Care Med 2004;32:1071—2.
47. Cooke MW, Higgins J, Kidd P. Use of emergency observa-
tion and assessment wards: a systematic literature review.
Emerg Med J 2003;20:138—42.
48. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed
therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368—77.
49. Leeson-Payne CG, Aitkenhead AR. A prospective study to
assess the demand for a high dependency unit. Anaesthesia
1995;50:383—7.
50. Guidelines for the utilisation of intensive care units. Euro-
pean Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care
Med 1994;20:163—4.
51. Haupt MT, Bekes CE, Brilli RJ, et al. Guidelines on critical
care services and personnel: recommendations based on a
system of categorization of three levels of care. Crit Care
Med 2003;31:2677—83.
52. Hillson SD, Rich EC, Dowd B, Luxenberg MG. Call nights
and patients care: effects on inpatients at one teaching
hospital. J Gen Intern Med 1992;7:405—10.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
53. Bell CM, Redelmeier DA. Mortality among patients admitted
to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. N
Engl J Med 2001;345:663—8.
54. Beck DH, McQuillan P, Smith GB. Waiting for the break of
dawn? The effects of discharge time, discharge TISS scores
and discharge facility on hospital mortality after intensive
care. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1287—93.
55. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky
K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals.
N Engl J Med 2002;346:1715—22.
56. Baskett PJ, Lim A. The varying ethical attitudes towards
resuscitation in Europe. Resuscitation 2004;62:267—73.
57. Gabbott D, Smith G, Mitchell S, et al. Cardiopulmonary
resuscitation standards for clinical practice and training in
the UK. Resuscitation 2005;64:13—9.
58. Bristow PJ, Hillman KM, Chey T, et al. Rates of in-hospital
arrests, deaths and intensive care admissions: the effect of
a medical emergency team. Med J Aust 2000;173:236—40.
59. Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S,
Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic
accuracy of first responders in patients with and without
a pulse. Resuscitation 1996;33:107—16.
60. Ruppert M, Reith MW, Widmann JH, et al. Checking
for breathing: evaluation of the diagnostic capability of
emergency medical services personnel, physicians, med-
ical students, and medical laypersons. Ann Emerg Med
1999;34:720—9.
61. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac
arrest. JAMA 2005;293:305—10.
62. Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, et al. Chest compression
rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal:
a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Cir-
culation 2005;111:428—34.
63. Perkins GD, Roberts C, Gao F. Delays in defibrillation: influ-
ence of different monitoring techniques. Br J Anaesth
2002;89:405—8.
64. Soar J, Perkins GD, Harris S, Nolan JP. The immediate life
support course. Resuscitation 2003;57:21—6.
65. Nolan J. Advanced life support training. Resuscitation
2001;50:9—11.
66. Perkins G, Lockey A. The advanced life support provider
course. BMJ 2002;325:S81.
67. Bayes de Luna A, Coumel P, Leclercq JF. Ambulatory sudden
cardiac death: mechanisms of production of fatal arrhyth-
mia on the basis of data from 157 cases. Am Heart J
1989;117:151—9.
68. Rea TD, Shah S, Kudenchuk PJ, Copass MK, Cobb LA. Auto-
mated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algo-
rithm delay CPR? Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:132—41.
69. van Alem AP, Sanou BT, Koster RW. Interruption of car-
diopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated
external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann
Emerg Med 2003;42:449—57.
70. Hess EP, White RD. Ventricular fibrillation is not pro-
voked by chest compression during post-shock organized
rhythms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2005;66:7—11.
71. Eftestol T, Wik L, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of cardiopul-
monary resuscitation on predictors of ventricular fibrilla-
tion defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Circulation 2004;110:10—5.
72. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Aase SO, Husoy JH, Steen PA. Predict-
ing outcome of defibrillation by spectral characterization
and nonparametric classification of ventricular fibrillation
in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation
2000;102:1523—9.
S77
73. Eftestol T, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of interrupting pre-
cordial compressions on the calculated probability of defib-
rillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cir-
culation 2002;105:2270—3.
74. Caldwell G, Millar G, Quinn E. Simple mechanical meth-
ods for cardioversion: defence of the precordial thump and
cough version. Br Med J 1985;291:627—30.
75. Kohl P, King AM, Boulin C. Antiarrhythmic effects of acute
mechanical stiumulation. In: Kohl P, Sachs F, Franz MR, edi-
tors. Cardiac mechano-electric feedback and arrhythmias:
form pipette to patient. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;
2005. p. 304—14.
76. Krijne R. Rate acceleration of ventricular tachycardia after
a precordial chest thump. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:964—5.
77. Emerman CL, Pinchak AC, Hancock D, Hagen JF. Effect of
injection site on circulation times during cardiac arrest.
Crit Care Med 1988;16:1138—41.
78. Glaeser PW, Hellmich TR, Szewczuga D, Losek JD, Smith DS.
Five-year experience in prehospital intraosseous infusions
in children and adults. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1119—24.
79. Schuttler J, Bartsch A, Ebeling BJ, et al. Endobronchial
administration of adrenaline in preclinical cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed
1987;22:63—8.
80. Hornchen U, Schuttler J, Stoeckel H, Eichelkraut W,
Hahn N. Endobronchial instillation of epinephrine
during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med
1987;15:1037—9.
81. Vaknin Z, Manisterski Y, Ben-Abraham R, et al. Is endotra-
cheal adrenaline deleterious because of the beta adrener-
gic effect? Anesth Analg 2001;92:1408—12.
82. Manisterski Y, Vaknin Z, Ben-Abraham R, et al. Endotra-
cheal epinephrine: a call for larger doses. Anesth Analg
2002;95:1037—41 [table of contents].
83. Efrati O, Ben-Abraham R, Barak A, et al. Endo-
bronchial adrenaline: should it be reconsidered? Dose
response and haemodynamic effect in dogs. Resuscitation
2003;59:117—22.
84. Elizur A, Ben-Abraham R, Manisterski Y, et al. Tracheal
epinephrine or norepinephrine preceded by beta blockade
in a dog model. Can beta blockade bestow any benefits?
Resuscitation 2003;59:271—6.
85. Naganobu K, Hasebe Y, Uchiyama Y, Hagio M, Ogawa H. A
comparison of distilled water and normal saline as diluents
for endobronchial administration of epinephrine in the dog.
Anesth Analg 2000;91:317—21.
86. Eftestol T, Wik L, Sunde K, Steen PA. Effects of cardiopul-
monary resuscitation on predictors of ventricular fibrilla-
tion defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Circulation 2004;110:10—5.
87. Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Ewy GA. Precountershock
cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves ventricular fibril-
lation median frequency and myocardial readiness for suc-
cessful defibrillation from prolonged ventricular fibrilla-
tion: a randomized, controlled swine study. Ann Emerg Med
2002;40:563—70.
88. Achleitner U, Wenzel V, Strohmenger HU, et al. The bene-
ficial effect of basic life support on ventricular fibrillation
mean frequency and coronary perfusion pressure. Resusci-
tation 2001;51:151—8.
89. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Amiodarone for
resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to
ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1999;341:871—8.
90. Dorian P, Cass D, Schwartz B, Cooper R, Gelaznikas
R, Barr A. Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for
shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med
2002;346:884—90.
S78
91. Thel MC, Armstrong AL, McNulty SE, Califf RM, O’Connor
CM. Randomised trial of magnesium in in-hospital cardiac
arrest. Lancet 1997;350:1272—6.
92. Allegra J, Lavery R, Cody R, et al. Magnesium sulfate in
the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation in the
prehospital setting. Resuscitation 2001;49:245—9.
93. Fatovich D, Prentice D, Dobb G. Magnesium in in-hospital
cardiac arrest. Lancet 1998;351:446.
94. Hassan TB, Jagger C, Barnett DB. A randomised trial to
investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refrac-
tory ventricular fibrillation. Emerg Med J 2002;19:57—62.
95. Miller B, Craddock L, Hoffenberg S, et al. Pilot study of
intravenous magnesium sulfate in refractory cardiac arrest:
safety data and recommendations for future studies. Resus-
citation 1995;30:3—14.
96. Weil MH, Rackow EC, Trevino R, Grundler W, Falk JL, Grif-
fel MI. Difference in acid—base state between venous and
arterial blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl
J Med 1986;315:153—6.
97. Bottiger BW, Bode C, Kern S, et al. Efficacy and safety of
thrombolytic therapy after initially unsuccessful cardiopul-
monary resuscitation: a prospective clinical trial. Lancet
2001;357:1583—5.
98. Boidin MP. Airway patency in the unconscious patient. Br J
Anaesth 1985;57:306—10.
99. Nandi PR, Charlesworth CH, Taylor SJ, Nunn JF, Dore CJ.
Effect of general anaesthesia on the pharynx. Br J Anaesth
1991;66:157—62.
100. Guildner CW. Resuscitation: opening the airway. A compar-
ative study of techniques for opening an airway obstructed
by the tongue. JACEP 1976;5:588—90.
101. Safar P, Aguto-Escarraga L. Compliance in apneic anes-
thetized adults. Anesthesiology 1959;20:283—9.
102. Greene DG, Elam JO, Dobkin AB, Studley CL. Cinefluoro-
graphic study of hyperextension of the neck and upper
airway patency. Jama 1961;176:570—3.
103. Morikawa S, Safar P, Decarlo J. Influence of the head-
jaw position upon upper airway patency. Anesthesiology
1961;22:265—70.
104. Ruben HM, Elam JO, Ruben AM, Greene DG. Investigation of
upper airway problems in resuscitation. 1. Studies of pha-
ryngeal X-rays and performance by laymen. Anesthesiology
1961;22:271—9.
105. Elam JO, Greene DG, Schneider MA, et al. Head-tilt method
of oral resuscitation. JAMA 1960;172:812—5.
106. Aprahamian C, Thompson BM, Finger WA, Darin JC. Experi-
mental cervical spine injury model: evaluation of airway
management and splinting techniques. Ann Emerg Med
1984;13:584—7.
107. Donaldson 3rd WF, Heil BV, Donaldson VP, Silvaggio VJ. The
effect of airway maneuvers on the unstable C1-C2 segment.
A cadaver study. Spine 1997;22:1215—8.
108. Donaldson 3rd WF, Towers JD, Doctor A, Brand A, Donaldson
VP. A methodology to evaluate motion of the unstable spine
during intubation techniques. Spine 1993;18:2020—3.
109. Hauswald M, Sklar DP, Tandberg D, Garcia JF. Cervical
spine movement during airway management: cinefluoro-
scopic appraisal in human cadavers. Am J Emerg Med
1991;9:535—8.
110. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kunzel KH, Gaber O, Boehler M,
Puhringer F. Cervical spine motion during airway manage-
ment: a cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabi-
lized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers. Anesth
Analg 2000;91:1274—8.
111. Majernick TG, Bieniek R, Houston JB, Hughes HG. Cervical
spine movement during orotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg
Med 1986;15:417—20.
J.P. Nolan et al.
112. Lennarson PJ, Smith DW, Sawin PD, Todd MM, Sato Y,
Traynelis VC. Cervical spinal motion during intubation: effi-
cacy of stabilization maneuvers in the setting of complete
segmental instability. J Neurosurg Spine 2001;94:265—70.
113. Marsh AM, Nunn JF, Taylor SJ, Charlesworth CH. Airway
obstruction associated with the use of the Guedel airway.
Br J Anaesth 1991;67:517—23.
114. Schade K, Borzotta A, Michaels A. Intracranial malposition
of nasopharyngeal airway. J Trauma 2000;49:967—8.
115. Muzzi DA, Losasso TJ, Cucchiara RF. Complication from a
nasopharyngeal airway in a patient with a basilar skull frac-
ture. Anesthesiology 1991;74:366—8.
116. Roberts K, Porter K. How do you size a nasopharyngeal air-
way. Resuscitation 2003;56:19—23.
117. Stoneham MD. The nasopharyngeal airway. Assessment
of position by fibreoptic laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia
1993;48:575—80.
118. Moser DK, Dracup K, Doering LV. Effect of cardiopulmonary
resuscitation training for parents of high-risk neonates
on perceived anxiety, control, and burden. Heart Lung
1999;28:326—33.
119. Kandakai T, King K. Perceived self-efficacy in perform-
ing lifesaving skills: an assessment of the American Red
Cross’s Responding to Emergencies course. J Health Educ
1999;30:235—41.
120. Lester CA, Donnelly PD, Assar D. Lay CPR trainees: retrain-
ing, confidence and willingness to attempt resuscitation 4
years after training. Resuscitation 2000;45:77—82.
121. Pane GA, Salness KA. A survey of participants in a mass CPR
training course. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:1112—6.
122. Heilman KM, Muschenheim C. Primary cutaneous tubercu-
losis resulting from mouth-to-mouth respiration. N Engl J
Med 1965;273:1035—6.
123. Christian MD, Loutfy M, McDonald LC, et al. Possible SARS
coronavirus transmission during cardiopulmonary resusci-
tation. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:287—93.
124. Alexander R, Hodgson P, Lomax D, Bullen C. A comparison
of the laryngeal mask airway and Guedel airway, bag and
face mask for manual ventilation following formal training.
Anaesthesia 1993;48:231—4.
125. Dorges V, Sauer C, Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P.
Smaller tidal volumes during cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion: comparison of adult and paediatric self-inflatable
bags with three different ventilatory devices. Resuscita-
tion 1999;43:31—7.
126. Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P, Dorges V. Effective-
ness of various airway management techniques in a bench
model simulating a cardiac arrest patient. J Emerg Med
2001;20:7—12.
127. Stone BJ, Chantler PJ, Baskett PJ. The incidence of regurgi-
tation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison
between the bag valve mask and laryngeal mask airway.
Resuscitation 1998;38:3—6.
128. Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG. Airway obstruction with cricoid
pressure. Anaesthesia 2000;55:208—11.
129. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al.
Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Circulation 2004;109:1960—5.
130. Stallinger A, Wenzel V, Wagner-Berger H, et al. Effects of
decreasing inspiratory flow rate during simulated basic life
support ventilation of a cardiac arrest patient on lung and
stomach tidal volumes. Resuscitation 2002;54:167—73.
131. Noordergraaf GJ, van Dun PJ, Kramer BP, et al. Can
first responders achieve and maintain normocapnia when
sequentially ventilating with a bag-valve device and two
oxygen-driven resuscitators? A controlled clinical trial in
104 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:367—72.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
132. Jones JH, Murphy MP, Dickson RL, Somerville GG, Brizen-
dine EJ. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intu-
bation: miss rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med
2004;11:707—9.
133. Pelucio M, Halligan L, Dhindsa H. Out-of-hospital experi-
ence with the syringe esophageal detector device. Acad
Emerg Med 1997;4:563—8.
134. Sayre MR, Sakles JC, Mistler AF, Evans JL, Kramer AT, Panci-
oli AM. Field trial of endotracheal intubation by basic EMTs.
Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:228—33.
135. Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by
paramedics in an urban emergency medical services sys-
tem. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:32—7.
136. Nolan JP, Prehospital. resuscitative airway care: should
the gold standard be reassessed? Curr Opin Crit Care
2001;7:413—21.
137. Davies PR, Tighe SQ, Greenslade GL, Evans GH. Laryngeal
mask airway and tracheal tube insertion by unskilled per-
sonnel. Lancet 1990;336:977—9.
138. Flaishon R, Sotman A, Ben-Abraham R, Rudick V, Varssano D,
Weinbroum AA. Antichemical protective gear prolongs time
to successful airway management: a randomized, crossover
study in humans. Anesthesiology 2004;100:260—6.
139. Ho BY, Skinner HJ, Mahajan RP. Gastro-oesophageal reflux
during day case gynaecological laparoscopy under positive
pressure ventilation: laryngeal mask vs. tracheal intuba-
tion. Anaesthesia 1998;53:921—4.
140. Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of
the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by
paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med
1994;24:260—3.
141. Rewari W, Kaul HL. Regurgitation and aspiration during
gynaecological laparoscopy: comparison between laryngeal
mask airway and tracheal intubation. J Anaesth Clin Phar-
macol 1999;15:67—70.
142. Pennant JH, Walker MB. Comparison of the endotra-
cheal tube and laryngeal mask in airway management by
paramedical personnel. Anesth Analg 1992;74:531—4.
143. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Fick GH.
LMA-Classic and LMA-ProSeal are effective alternatives to
endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can
J Anaesth 2003;50:71—7.
144. Rumball CJ, MacDonald D, The PTL. Combitube, laryngeal
mask, and oral airway: a randomized prehospital compar-
ative study of ventilatory device effectiveness and cost-
effectiveness in 470 cases of cardiorespiratory arrest. Pre-
hosp Emerg Care 1997;1:1—10.
145. Verghese C, Prior-Willeard PF, Baskett PJ. Immediate man-
agement of the airway during cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion in a hospital without a resident anaesthesiologist. Eur
J Emerg Med 1994;1:123—5.
146. Tanigawa K, Shigematsu A. Choice of airway devices for
12,020 cases of nontraumatic cardiac arrest in Japan. Pre-
hosp Emerg Care 1998;2:96—100.
147. The use of the laryngeal mask airway by nurses during car-
diopulmonary resuscitation: results of a multicentre trial.
Anaesthesia 1994;49:3—7.
148. Grantham H, Phillips G, Gilligan JE. The laryngeal mask in
prehospital emergency care. Emerg Med 1994;6:193—7.
149. Kokkinis K. The use of the laryngeal mask airway in CPR.
Resuscitation 1994;27:9—12.
150. Leach A, Alexander CA, Stone B. The laryngeal mask in car-
diopulmonary resuscitation in a district general hospital: a
preliminary communication. Resuscitation 1993;25:245—8.
151. Staudinger T, Brugger S, Watschinger B, et al. Emergency
intubation with the Combitube: comparison with the endo-
tracheal airway. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1573—5.
S79
152. Lefrancois DP, Dufour DG. Use of the esophageal tracheal
combitube by basic emergency medical technicians. Resus-
citation 2002;52:77—83.
153. Ochs M, Vilke GM, Chan TC, Moats T, Buchanan J. Successful
prehospital airway management by EMT-Ds using the com-
bitube. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000;4:333—7.
154. Vezina D, Lessard MR, Bussieres J, Topping C, Trepanier
CA. Complications associated with the use of the
esophageal—tracheal Combitube. Can J Anaesth
1998;45:76—80.
155. Richards CF. Piriform sinus perforation during
esophageal—tracheal Combitube placement. J Emerg
Med 1998;16:37—9.
156. Rumball C, Macdonald D, Barber P, Wong H, Smecher C.
Endotracheal intubation and esophageal tracheal Com-
bitube insertion by regular ambulance attendants: a com-
parative trial. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004;8:15—22.
157. Rabitsch W, Schellongowski P, Staudinger T, et al. Compar-
ison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube
in an urban emergency medical services system run by
physicians. Resuscitation 2003;57:27—32.
158. Cook TM, McCormick B, Asai T. Randomized compari-
son of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway
for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth
2003;91:373—8.
159. Cook TM, McKinstry C, Hardy R, Twigg S. Randomized
crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway
with the laryngeal tube during anaesthesia with controlled
ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:678—83.
160. Asai T, Kawachi S. Use of the laryngeal tube by paramedic
staff. Anaesthesia 2004;59:408—9.
161. Asai T, Moriyama S, Nishita Y, Kawachi S. Use of the
laryngeal tube during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by
paramedical staff. Anaesthesia 2003;58:393—4.
162. Genzwuerker HV, Dhonau S, Ellinger K. Use of the laryn-
geal tube for out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation
2002;52:221—4.
163. Kette F, Reffo I, Giordani G, et al. The use of laryngeal
tube by nurses in out-of-hospital emergencies: preliminary
experience. Resuscitation 2005;66:21—5.
164. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, et al. Randomized crossover
comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask
airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth
2002;88:527—33.
165. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask
airway: a review of the literature [Le masque larynge
ProSealTM: un examen des publications]. Can J Anaesth
2005;52:739—60.
166. Cook TM, Gupta K, Gabbott DA, Nolan JP. An evalu-
ation of the airway management device. Anaesthesia
2001;56:660—4.
167. Chiu CL, Wang CY. An evaluation of the modified
airway management device. Anaesth Intensive Care
2004;32:77—80.
168. Cook TM, McCormick B, Gupta K, Hersch P, Simpson T. An
evaluation of the PA(Xpress) pharyngeal airway—–a new sin-
gle use airway device. Resuscitation 2003;58:139—43.
169. Burgoyne L, Cyna A. Laryngeal mask vs intubating laryngeal
mask: insertion and ventilation by inexperienced resusci-
tators. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001;29:604—8.
170. Choyce A, Avidan MS, Shariff A, Del Aguila M, Radcliffe
JJ, Chan T. A comparison of the intubating and standard
laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexpe-
rienced personnel. Anaesthesia 2001;56:357—60.
171. Baskett PJ, Parr MJ, Nolan JP. The intubating laryngeal
mask. Results of a multicentre trial with experience of 500
cases. Anaesthesia 1998;53:1174—9.
S80
172. Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al. Effect of out-
of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival
and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA
2000;283:783—970.
173. Guly UM, Mitchell RG, Cook R, Steedman DJ, Robert-
son CE. Paramedics and technicians are equally suc-
cessful at managing cardiac arrest outside hospital. BMJ
1995;310:1091—4.
174. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Field B, et al. Advanced cardiac life
support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med
2004;351:647—56.
175. Garza AG, Gratton MC, Coontz D, Noble E, Ma OJ. Effect
of paramedic experience on orotracheal intubation success
rates. J Emerg Med 2003;25:251—6.
176. Li J. Capnography alone is imperfect for endotracheal tube
placement confirmation during emergency intubation. J
Emerg Med 2001;20:223—9.
177. Tanigawa K, Takeda T, Goto E, Tanaka K. Accuracy and relia-
bility of the self-inflating bulb to verify tracheal intubation
in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Anesthesiology
2000;93:1432—6.
178. Takeda T, Tanigawa K, Tanaka H, Hayashi Y, Goto E, Tanaka
K. The assessment of three methods to verify tracheal
tube placement in the emergency setting. Resuscitation
2003;56:153—7.
179. Baraka A, Khoury PJ, Siddik SS, Salem MR, Joseph NJ. Effi-
cacy of the self-inflating bulb in differentiating esophageal
from tracheal intubation in the parturient undergoing
cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1997;84:533—7.
180. Davis DP, Stephen KA, Vilke GM. Inaccuracy in endotra-
cheal tube verification using a Toomey syringe. J Emerg
Med 1999;17:35—8.
181. Grmec S. Comparison of three different methods to confirm
tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation. Inten-
sive Care Med 2002;28:701—4.
182. American Heart Association in collaboration with Interna-
tional Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Guidelines 2000
for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardio-
vascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Part 6.
Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: Section 6. Pharma-
cology II: Agents to Optimize Cardiac Output and Blood
Pressure. Circulation 2000;102(Suppl. I):I129—35.
183. Lindner KH, Strohmenger HU, Ensinger H, Hetzel WD, Ahne-
feld FW, Georgieff M. Stress hormone response during
and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anesthesiology
1992;77:662—8.
184. Lindner KH, Haak T, Keller A, Bothner U, Lurie KG. Release
of endogenous vasopressors during and after cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Heart 1996;75:145—50.
185. Morris DC, Dereczyk BE, Grzybowski M, et al. Vaso-
pressin can increase coronary perfusion pressure during
human cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med
1997;4:878—83.
186. Lindner KH, Prengel AW, Brinkmann A, Strohmenger HU,
Lindner IM, Lurie KG. Vasopressin administration in refrac-
tory cardiac arrest. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:1061—4.
187. Lindner KH, Brinkmann A, Pfenninger EG, Lurie KG, Goertz
A, Lindner IM. Effect of vasopressin on hemodynamic
variables, organ blood flow, and acid—base status in a
pig model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anesth Analg
1993;77:427—35.
188. Lindner KH, Prengel AW, Pfenninger EG, et al. Vaso-
pressin improves vital organ blood flow during closed-
chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs. Circulation
1995;91:215—21.
189. Wenzel V, Lindner KH, Prengel AW, et al. Vasopressin
improves vital organ blood flow after prolonged cardiac
J.P. Nolan et al.
arrest with postcountershock pulseless electrical activity
in pigs. Crit Care Med 1999;27:486—92.
190. Voelckel WG, Lurie KG, McKnite S, et al. Comparison of
epinephrine and vasopressin in a pediatric porcine model of
asphyxial cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2000;28:3777—83.
191. Babar SI, Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Ewy GA. Vaso-
pressin versus epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resus-
citation: a randomized swine outcome study. Resuscitation
1999;41:185—92.
192. Lindner KH, Dirks B, Strohmenger HU, Prengel AW, Lindner
IM, Lurie KG. Randomised comparison of epinephrine and
vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fib-
rillation. Lancet 1997;349:535—7.
193. Stiell IG, Hebert PC, Wells GA, et al. Vasopressin versus
epinephrine for inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised
controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:105—9.
194. Wenzel V, Krismer AC, Arntz HR, Sitter H, Stadlbauer KH,
Lindner KH. A comparison of vasopressin and epinephrine
for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J
Med 2004;350:105—13.
195. Aung K, Htay T. Vasopressin for cardiac arrest: a sys-
tematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med
2005;165:17—24.
196. Callaham M, Madsen C, Barton C, Saunders C, Daley
M, Pointer J. A randomized clinical trial of high-
dose epinephrine and norepinephrine versus standard-
dose epinephrine in prehospital cardiac arrest. JAMA
1992;268:2667—72.
197. Masini E, Planchenault J, Pezziardi F, Gautier P, Gagnol JP.
Histamine-releasing properties of Polysorbate 80 in vitro
and in vivo: correlation with its hypotensive action in the
dog. Agents Actions 1985;16:470—7.
198. Somberg JC, Bailin SJ, Haffajee CI, et al. Intravenous lido-
caine versus intravenous amiodarone (in a new aqueous
formulation) for incessant ventricular tachycardia. Am J
Cardiol 2002;90:853—9.
199. Somberg JC, Timar S, Bailin SJ, et al. Lack of a hypoten-
sive effect with rapid administration of a new aque-
ous formulation of intravenous amiodarone. Am J Cardiol
2004;93:576—81.
200. Skrifvars MB, Kuisma M, Boyd J, et al. The use of undiluted
amiodarone in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:582—7.
201. Petrovic T, Adnet F, Lapandry C. Successful resuscitation
of ventricular fibrillation after low-dose amiodarone. Ann
Emerg Med 1998;32:518—9.
202. Levine JH, Massumi A, Scheinman MM, et al. Intravenous
amiodarone for recurrent sustained hypotensive ventricu-
lar tachyarrhythmias. Intravenous Amiodarone Multicenter
Trial Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:67—75.
203. Matsusaka T, Hasebe N, Jin YT, Kawabe J, Kikuchi K.
Magnesium reduces myocardial infarct size via enhance-
ment of adenosine mechanism in rabbits. Cardiovasc Res
2002;54:568—75.
204. Longstreth Jr WT, Fahrenbruch CE, Olsufka M, Walsh TR,
Copass MK, Cobb LA. Randomized clinical trial of mag-
nesium, diazepam, or both after out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Neurology 2002;59:506—14.
205. Baraka A, Ayoub C, Kawkabani N. Magnesium therapy
for refractory ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiothorac Vasc
Anesth 2000;14:196—9.
206. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Hebert PC, Laupacis A, Weitzman BN.
Association of drug therapy with survival in cardiac arrest:
limited role of advanced cardiac life support drugs. Acad
Emerg Med 1995;2:264—73.
207. Engdahl J, Bang A, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J. Can we define
patients with no and those with some chance of sur-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
vival when found in asystole out of hospital? Am J Cardiol
2000;86:610—4.
208. Engdahl J, Bang A, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J. Factors affect-
ing short- and long-term prognosis among 1069 patients
with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and pulseless electrical
activity. Resuscitation 2001;51:17—25.
209. Dumot JA, Burval DJ, Sprung J, et al. Outcome of adult
cardiopulmonary resuscitations at a tertiary referral center
including results of ‘‘limited’’ resuscitations. Arch Intern
Med 2001;161:1751—8.
210. Tortolani AJ, Risucci DA, Powell SR, Dixon R. In-hospital
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during asystole. Thera-
peutic factors associated with 24-hour survival. Chest
1989;96:622—6.
211. Viskin S, Belhassen B, Roth A, et al. Aminophylline for
bradyasystolic cardiac arrest refractory to atropine and
epinephrine. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:279—81.
212. Mader TJ, Gibson P. Adenosine receptor antagonism in
refractory asystolic cardiac arrest: results of a human pilot
study. Resuscitation 1997;35:3—7.
213. Mader TJ, Smithline HA, Gibson P. Aminophylline in undif-
ferentiated out-of-hospital asystolic cardiac arrest. Resus-
citation 1999;41:39—45.
214. Mader TJ, Smithline HA, Durkin L, Scriver G. A ran-
domized controlled trial of intravenous aminophylline for
atropine-resistant out-of-hospital asystolic cardiac arrest.
Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:192—7.
215. Dybvik T, Strand T, Steen PA. Buffer therapy during out-
of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation
1995;29:89—95.
216. Aufderheide TP, Martin DR, Olson DW, et al. Prehospital
bicarbonate use in cardiac arrest: a 3-year experience. Am
J Emerg Med 1992;10:4—7.
217. Delooz H, Lewi PJ. Are inter-center differences in
EMS-management and sodium-bicarbonate administra-
tion important for the outcome of CPR? The Cerebral
Resuscitation Study Group. Resuscitation 1989;17(Suppl.):
S199—206.
218. Roberts D, Landolfo K, Light R, Dobson K. Early predictors
of mortality for hospitalized patients suffering cardiopul-
monary arrest. Chest 1990;97:413—9.
219. Suljaga-Pechtel K, Goldberg E, Strickon P, Berger M,
Skovron ML. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a hospital-
ized population: prospective study of factors associated
with outcome. Resuscitation 1984;12:77—95.
220. Weil MH, Trevino RP, Rackow EC. Sodium bicarbonate during
CPR. Does it help or hinder? Chest 1985;88:487.
221. Bar-Joseph G, Abramson NS, Kelsey SF, Mashiach T, Craig
MT, Safar P. Improved resuscitation outcome in emergency
medical systems with increased usage of sodium bicarbon-
ate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acta Anaesthe-
siol Scand 2005;49:6—15.
222. Sandeman DJ, Alahakoon TI, Bentley SC. Tricyclic
poisoning—–successful management of ventricular fibrilla-
tion following massive overdose of imipramine. Anaesth
Intensive Care 1997;25:542—5.
223. Lin SR. The effect of dextran and streptokinase on cerebral
function and blood flow after cardiac arrest. An experimen-
tal study on the dog. Neuroradiology 1978;16:340—2.
224. Fischer M, Bottiger BW, Popov-Cenic S, Hossmann KA.
Thrombolysis using plasminogen activator and heparin
reduces cerebral no-reflow after resuscitation from cardiac
arrest: an experimental study in the cat. Intensive Care
Med 1996;22:1214—23.
225. Ruiz-Bailen M, Aguayo de Hoyos E, Serrano-Corcoles MC,
Diaz-Castellanos MA, Ramos-Cuadra JA, Reina-Toral A. Effi-
cacy of thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial
S81
infarction requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Inten-
sive Care Med 2001;27:1050—7.
226. Lederer W, Lichtenberger C, Pechlaner C, Kroesen G,
Baubin M. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator during
cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 108 patients with out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2001;50:71—6.
227. Tiffany PA, Schultz M, Stueven H. Bolus thrombolytic
infusions during CPR for patients with refractory arrest
rhythms: outcome of a case series. Ann Emerg Med
1998;31:124—6.
228. Abu-Laban RB, Christenson JM, Innes GD, et al. Tissue plas-
minogen activator in cardiac arrest with pulseless electri-
cal activity. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1522—8.
229. Janata K, Holzer M, Kurkciyan I, et al. Major bleeding com-
plications in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the place of
thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest due to massive pul-
monary embolism. Resuscitation 2003;57:49—55.
230. Scholz KH, Hilmer T, Schuster S, Wojcik J, Kreuzer H, Tebbe
U. Thrombolysis in resuscitated patients with pulmonary
embolism. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1990;115:930—5.
231. Lederer W, Lichtenberger C, Pechlaner C, Kinzl J, Kroesen
G, Baubin M. Long-term survival and neurological outcome
of patients who received recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscita-
tion 2004;61:123—9.
232. Gramann J, Lange-Braun P, Bodemann T, Hochrein H. Der
Einsatz von Thrombolytika in der Reanimation als Ultima
ratio zur Überwindung des Herztodes. Intensiv- und Not-
fallbehandlung 1991;16:134—7.
233. Klefisch F, et al. Praklinische ultima-ratio thrombolyse bei
therapierefraktarer kardiopulmonaler reanimation. Inten-
sivmedizin 1995;32:155—62.
234. Ruiz-Bailen M, Aguayo-de-Hoyos E, Serrano-Corcoles MC,
et al. Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in fulmi-
nant pulmonary embolism. A case series. Resuscitation
2001;51:97—101.
235. Böttiger BW, Martin E. Thrombolytic therapy during car-
diopulmonary resuscitation and the role of coagulation
activation after cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care
2001;7:176—83.
236. Spöhr F, Böttiger BW. Safety of thrombolysis dur-
ing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Drug Saf 2003;26:
367—79.
237. Langhelle A, Tyvold SS, Lexow K, Hapnes SA, Sunde K, Steen
PA. In-hospital factors associated with improved outcome
after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A comparison between
four regions in Norway. Resuscitation 2003;56:247—63.
238. Calle PA, Buylaert WA, Vanhaute OA. Glycemia in the
post-resuscitation period. The Cerebral Resuscitation Study
Group. Resuscitation 1989;17(Suppl.):S181—8.
239. Longstreth Jr WT, Diehr P, Inui TS. Prediction of awak-
ening after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med
1983;308:1378—82.
240. Longstreth Jr WT, Inui TS. High blood glucose level on hospi-
tal admission and poor neurological recovery after cardiac
arrest. Ann Neurol 1984;15:59—63.
241. Longstreth Jr WT, Copass MK, Dennis LK, Rauch-Matthews
ME, Stark MS, Cobb LA. Intravenous glucose after out-of-
hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a community-based ran-
domized trial. Neurology 1993;43:2534—41.
242. Mackenzie CF. A review of 100 cases of cardiac arrest and
the relation of potassium, glucose, and haemoglobin levels
to survival. West Indian Med J 1975;24:39—45.
243. Mullner M, Sterz F, Binder M, Schreiber W, Deimel A,
Laggner AN. Blood glucose concentration after cardiopul-
monary resuscitation influences functional neurological
S82
recovery in human cardiac arrest survivors. J Cereb Blood
Flow Metab 1997;17:430—6.
244. Skrifvars MB, Pettila V, Rosenberg PH, Castren M. A mul-
tiple logistic regression analysis of in-hospital factors
related to survival at six months in patients resuscitated
from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation
2003;59:319—28.
245. Ditchey RV, Lindenfeld J. Potential adverse effects of vol-
ume loading on perfusion of vital organs during closed-
chest resuscitation. Circulation 1984;69:181—9.
246. Gentile NT, Martin GB, Appleton TJ, Moeggenberg J, Par-
adis NA, Nowak RM. Effects of arterial and venous volume
infusion on coronary perfusion pressures during canine CPR.
Resuscitation 1991;22:55—63.
247. Jameson SJ, Mateer JR, DeBehnke DJ. Early volume expan-
sion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation
1993;26:243—50.
248. Voorhees WD, Ralston SH, Kougias C, Schmitz PM. Fluid
loading with whole blood or Ringer’s lactate solution during
CPR in dogs. Resuscitation 1987;15:113—23.
249. Banerjee S, Singhi SC, Singh S, Singh M. The intraosseous
route is a suitable alternative to intravenous route for fluid
resuscitation in severely dehydrated children. Indian Pedi-
atr 1994;31:1511—20.
250. Brickman KR, Krupp K, Rega P, Alexander J, Guinness M.
Typing and screening of blood from intraosseous access.
Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:414—7.
251. Fiser RT, Walker WM, Seibert JJ, McCarthy R, Fiser DH. Tib-
ial length following intraosseous infusion: a prospective,
radiographic analysis. Pediatr Emerg Care 1997;13:186—8.
252. Ummenhofer W, Frei FJ, Urwyler A, Drewe J. Are labora-
tory values in bone marrow aspirate predictable for venous
blood in paediatric patients? Resuscitation 1994;27:123—8.
253. Guy J, Haley K, Zuspan SJ. Use of intraosseous infu-
sion in the pediatric trauma patient. J Pediatr Surg
1993;28:158—61.
254. Macnab A, Christenson J, Findlay J, et al. A new system for
sternal intraosseous infusion in adults. Prehosp Emerg Care
2000;4:173—7.
255. Ellemunter H, Simma B, Trawoger R, Maurer H. Intraosseous
lines in preterm and full term neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F74—5.
256. Prengel AW, Lindner KH, Hahnel JH, Georgieff M. Phar-
macokinetics and technique of endotracheal and deep
endobronchial lidocaine administration. Anesth Analg
1993;77:985—9.
257. Prengel AW, Rembecki M, Wenzel V, Steinbach G. A com-
parison of the endotracheal tube and the laryngeal mask
airway as a route for endobronchial lidocaine administra-
tion. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1505—9.
258. Steinfath M, Scholz J, Schulte am Esch J, Laer S, Reymann
A, Scholz H. The technique of endobronchial lidocaine
administration does not influence plasma concentration
profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters in humans. Resus-
citation 1995;29:55—62.
259. Hahnel JH, Lindner KH, Schurmann C, Prengel A, Ahne-
feld FW. Plasma lidocaine levels and PaO2 with endo-
bronchial administration: dilution with normal saline or
distilled water? Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1314—7.
260. Del Guercio LRM, Feins NR, Cohn JD, Coumaraswamy RP,
Wollmann SB, State D. Comparison of blood flow during
external and internal cardiac massage in man. Circulation
1965;31(Suppl. 1):I171—80.
261. Feneley MP, Maier GW, Kern KB, et al. Influence of com-
pression rate on initial success of resuscitation and 24 hour
survival after prolonged manual cardiopulmonary resusci-
tation in dogs. Circulation 1988;77:240—50.
J.P. Nolan et al.
262. Halperin HR, Tsitlik JE, Guerci AD, et al. Determinants of
blood flow to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resusci-
tation in dogs. Circulation 1986;73:539—50.
263. Kern KB, Sanders AB, Raife J, Milander MM, Otto CW,
Ewy GA. A study of chest compression rates during car-
diopulmonary resuscitation in humans: the importance
of rate-directed chest compressions. Arch Intern Med
1992;152:145—9.
264. Ornato JP, Gonzalez ER, Garnett AR, Levine RL, McClung
BK. Effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation compression
rate on end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration and arterial
pressure in man. Crit Care Med 1988;16:241—5.
265. Swenson RD, Weaver WD, Niskanen RA, Martin J, Dahlberg
S. Hemodynamics in humans during conventional and
experimental methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Circulation 1988;78:630—9.
266. Boczar ME, Howard MA, Rivers EP, et al. A technique revis-
ited: hemodynamic comparison of closed- and open-chest
cardiac massage during human cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion. Crit Care Med 1995;23:498—503.
267. Anthi A, Tzelepis GE, Alivizatos P, Michalis A, Palatianos
GM, Geroulanos S. Unexpected cardiac arrest after car-
diac surgery: incidence, predisposing causes, and out-
come of open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest
1998;113:15—9.
268. Pottle A, Bullock I, Thomas J, Scott L. Survival to dis-
charge following Open Chest Cardiac Compression (OCCC).
A 4-year retrospective audit in a cardiothoracic specialist
centre—–Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, United
Kingdom. Resuscitation 2002;52:269—72.
269. Babbs CF. Interposed abdominal compression CPR: a
comprehensive evidence based review. Resuscitation
2003;59:71—82.
270. Babbs CF, Nadkarni V. Optimizing chest compression to res-
cue ventilation ratios during one-rescuer CPR by profes-
sionals and lay persons: children are not just little adults.
Resuscitation 2004;61:173—81.
271. Beyar R, Kishon Y, Kimmel E, Neufeld H, Dinnar U. Intratho-
racic and abdominal pressure variations as an efficient
method for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: studies in dogs
compared with computer model results. Cardiovasc Res
1985;19:335—42.
272. Voorhees WD, Niebauer MJ, Babbs CF. Improved oxy-
gen delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with
interposed abdominal compressions. Ann Emerg Med
1983;12:128—35.
273. Sack JB, Kesselbrenner MB, Jarrad A. Interposed abdominal
compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscita-
tion outcome during asystole and electromechanical disso-
ciation. Circulation 1992;86:1692—700.
274. Sack JB, Kesselbrenner MB, Bregman D. Survival from in-
hospital cardiac arrest with interposed abdominal coun-
terpulsation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA
1992;267:379—85.
275. Mateer JR, Stueven HA, Thompson BM, Aprahamian C,
Darin JC. Pre-hospital IAC-CPR versus standard CPR:
paramedic resuscitation of cardiac arrests. Am J Emerg Med
1985;3:143—6.
276. Lindner KH, Pfenninger EG, Lurie KG, Schurmann
W, Lindner IM, Ahnefeld FW. Effects of active
compression—decompression resuscitation on myocar-
dial and cerebral blood flow in pigs. Circulation
1993;88:1254—63.
277. Shultz JJ, Coffeen P, Sweeney M, et al. Evaluation of stan-
dard and active compression—decompression CPR in an
acute human model of ventricular fibrillation. Circulation
1994;89:684—93.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
278. Chang MW, Coffeen P, Lurie KG, Shultz J, Bache RJ, White
CW. Active compression—decompression CPR improves
vital organ perfusion in a dog model of ventricular fibril-
lation. Chest 1994;106:1250—9.
279. Orliaguet GA, Carli PA, Rozenberg A, Janniere D, Sauval
P, Delpech P. End-tidal carbon dioxide during out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: comparison of active
compression—decompression and standard CPR. Ann Emerg
Med 1995;25:48—51.
280. Tucker KJ, Galli F, Savitt MA, Kahsai D, Bresnahan L, Red-
berg RF. Active compression—decompression resuscitation:
effect on resuscitation success after in-hospital cardiac
arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:201—9.
281. Malzer R, Zeiner A, Binder M, et al. Hemodynamic effects of
active compression—decompression after prolonged CPR.
Resuscitation 1996;31:243—53.
282. Lurie KG, Shultz JJ, Callaham ML, et al. Evaluation of
active compression—decompression CPR in victims of out-
of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 1994;271:1405—11.
283. Cohen TJ, Goldner BG, Maccaro PC, et al. A comparison
of active compression—decompression cardiopulmonary
resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation
for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital. N Engl J Med
1993;329:1918—21.
284. Schwab TM, Callaham ML, Madsen CD, Utecht TA. A random-
ized clinical trial of active compression—decompression
CPR vs standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in
two cities. JAMA 1995;273:1261—8.
285. Stiell I, H’ebert P, Well G, et al. Tne Ontario trial of active
compression—decompression cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion for in-hospital and prehospital cardiac arrest. JAMA
1996;275:1417—23.
286. Mauer D, Schneider T, Dick W, Withelm A, Elich D, Mauer
M. Active compression—decompression resuscitation: a
prospective, randomized study in a two-tiered EMS system
with physicians in the field. Resuscitation 1996;33:125—34.
287. Nolan J, Smith G, Evans R, et al. The United Kingdom
pre-hospital study of active compression—decompression
resuscitation. Resuscitation 1998;37:119—25.
288. Luiz T, Ellinger K, Denz C. Active
compression—decompression cardiopulmonary resus-
citation does not improve survival in patients with
prehospital cardiac arrest in a physician-manned emer-
gency medical system. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
1996;10:178—86.
289. Plaisance P, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, et al. A compari-
son of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and
active compression—decompression resuscitation
for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. French Active
Compression—Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscita-
tion Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;341:569—75.
290. Lafuente-Lafuente C, Melero-Bascones M. Active chest
compression—decompression for cardiopulmonary resusci-
tation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD002751.
291. Baubin M, Rabl W, Pfeiffer KP, Benzer A, Gilly H. Chest
injuries after active compression—decompression car-
diopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) in cadavers. Resus-
citation 1999;43:9—15.
292. Rabl W, Baubin M, Broinger G, Scheithauer R. Serious com-
plications from active compression—decompression
cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Int J Legal Med
1996;109:84—9.
293. Hoke RS, Chamberlain D. Skeletal chest injuries sec-
ondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation
2004;63:327—38.
294. Plaisance P, Lurie KG, Payen D. Inspiratory impedance dur-
ing active compression—decompression cardiopulmonary
S83
resuscitation: a randomized evaluation in patients in car-
diac arrest. Circulation 2000;101:989—94.
295. Plaisance P, Soleil C, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, Ducros L, Payen
D. Use of an inspiratory impedance threshold device on
a facemask and endotracheal tube to reduce intratho-
racic pressures during the decompression phase of active
compression—decompression cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion. Crit Care Med 2005;33:990—4.
296. Wolcke BB, Mauer DK, Schoefmann MF, et al. Comparison
of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus the com-
bination of active compression—decompression cardiopul-
monary resuscitation and an inspiratory impedance thresh-
old device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation
2003;108:2201—5.
297. Aufderheide T, Pirrallo R, Provo T, Lurie K. Clini-
cal evaluation of an inspiratory impedance threshold
device during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in
patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med
2005;33:734—40.
298. Plaisance P, Lurie KG, Vicaut E, et al. Evaluation of an
impedance threshold device in patients receiving active
compression—decompression cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion for out of hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2004;61:265—71.
299. Sunde K, Wik L, Steen PA. Quality of mechanical, manual
standard and active compression—decompression CPR on
the arrest site and during transport in a manikin model.
Resuscitation 1997;34:235—42.
300. Wik L, Bircher NG, Safar P. A comparison of prolonged
manual and mechanical external chest compression after
cardiac arrest in dogs. Resuscitation 1996;32:241—50.
301. Dickinson ET, Verdile VP, Schneider RM, Salluzzo RF. Effec-
tiveness of mechanical versus manual chest compressions
in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: a pilot study.
Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:289—92.
302. McDonald JL. Systolic and mean arterial pressures during
manual and mechanical CPR in humans. Ann Emerg Med
1982;11:292—5.
303. Ward KR, Menegazzi JJ, Zelenak RR, Sullivan RJ, McSwain Jr
N. A comparison of chest compressions between mechan-
ical and manual CPR by monitoring end-tidal PCO2 during
human cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:669—74.
304. Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjoberg T. Eval-
uation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechani-
cal compression and active decompression resuscitation.
Resuscitation 2002;55:285—99.
305. Rubertsson S, Karlsten R. Increased cortical cerebral blood
flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest com-
pressions compared to standard external compressions dur-
ing experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resusci-
tation 2005;65:357—63.
306. Nielsen N, Sandhall L, Schersten F, Friberg H, Olsson SE.
Successful resuscitation with mechanical CPR, therapeu-
tic hypothermia and coronary intervention during man-
ual CPR after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2005;65:111—3.
307. Timerman S, Cardoso LF, Ramires JA, Halperin H. Improved
hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compres-
sion device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Resuscitation 2004;61:273—80.
308. Halperin H, Berger R, Chandra N, et al. Cardiopulmonary
resuscitation with a hydraulic-pneumatic band. Crit Care
Med 2000;28:N203—6.
309. Halperin HR, Paradis N, Ornato JP, et al. Cardiopulmonary
resuscitation with a novel chest compression device in a
porcine model of cardiac arrest: improved hemodynamics
and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2214—20.
S84
310. Casner M, Anderson D, et al. Preliminary report of the
impact of a new CPR assist device on the rate of return of
spontaneous circulation in out of hospital cardiac arrest.
Prehosp Emerg Med 2005;9:61—7.
311. Arntz HR, Agrawal R, Richter H, et al. Phased chest
and abdominal compression—decompression versus con-
ventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest. Circulation 2001;104:768—72.
312. Rozenberg A, Incagnoli P, Delpech P, et al. Prehospital use
of minimally invasive direct cardiac massage (MID-CM): a
pilot study. Resuscitation 2001;50:257—62.
313. Dauchot P, Gravenstein JS. Effects of atropine on the elec-
trocardiogram in different age groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther
1971;12:274—80.
314. Chamberlain DA, Turner P, Sneddon JM. Effects of atropine
on heart-rate in healthy man. Lancet 1967;2:12—5.
315. Bernheim A, Fatio R, Kiowski W, Weilenmann D, Rickli H,
Rocca HP. Atropine often results in complete atrioventric-
ular block or sinus arrest after cardiac transplantation: an
unpredictable and dose-independent phenomenon. Trans-
plantation 2004;77:1181—5.
316. Klumbies A, Paliege R, Volkmann H. Mechanical emer-
gency stimulation in asystole and extreme bradycardia. Z
Gesamte Inn Med 1988;43:348—52.
317. Zeh E, Rahner E. The manual extrathoracal stimulation of
the heart. Technique and effect of the precordial thump
(author’s transl). Z Kardiol 1978;67:299—304.
318. Chan L, Reid C, Taylor B. Effect of three emergency pac-
ing modalities on cardiac output in cardiac arrest due to
ventricular asystole. Resuscitation 2002;52:117—9.
319. Manz M, Pfeiffer D, Jung W, Lueritz B. Intravenous treat-
ment with magnesium in recurrent persistent ventricular
tachycardia. New Trends Arrhythmias 1991;7:437—42.
320. Tzivoni D, Banai S, Schuger C, et al. Treatment of
torsade de pointes with magnesium sulfate. Circulation
1988;77:392—7.
321. Sticherling C, Tada H, Hsu W, et al. Effects of diltiazem
and esmolol on cycle length and spontaneous conver-
sion of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther
2002;7:81—8.
322. Shettigar UR, Toole JG, Appunn DO. Combined use of
esmolol and digoxin in the acute treatment of atrial fib-
rillation or flutter. Am Heart J 1993;126:368—74.
323. Demircan C, Cikriklar HI, Engindeniz Z, et al. Comparison of
the effectiveness of intravenous diltiazem and metoprolol
in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibril-
lation. Emerg Med J 2005;22:411—4.
324. Wattanasuwan N, Khan IA, Mehta NJ, et al. Acute ven-
tricular rate control in atrial fibrillation: IV combination
of diltiazem and digoxin vs. IV diltiazem alone. Chest
2001;119:502—6.
325. Davey MJ, Teubner D. A randomized controlled trial of mag-
nesium sulfate, in addition to usual care, for rate control
in atrial fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:347—53.
326. Chiladakis JA, Stathopoulos C, Davlouros P, Manolis AS.
Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus diltiazem in parox-
ysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2001;79:287—91.
327. Camm AJ, Garratt CJ. Adenosine and supraventricular
tachycardia. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1621—9.
328. Wang HE, O’Connor RE, Megargel RE, et al. The use of
diltiazem for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in the out-
of-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:38—45.
329. Martinez-Marcos FJ, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Ortega-Carpio
A, Fernandez-Gomez JM, Santos JM, Camacho C. Com-
parison of intravenous flecainide, propafenone, and amio-
darone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus
rhythm. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:950—3.
J.P. Nolan et al.
330. Kalus JS, Spencer AP, Tsikouris JP, et al. Impact of pro-
phylactic i.v. magnesium on the efficacy of ibutilide for
conversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Am J Health Syst
Pharm 2003;60:2308—12.
331. Langhelle A, Nolan J, Herlitz J, et al. Recommended guide-
lines for reviewing, reporting, and conducting research
on post-resuscitation care: the Utstein style. Resuscitation
2005;66:271—83.
332. Menon DK, Coles JP, Gupta AK, et al. Diffusion lim-
ited oxygen delivery following head injury. Crit Care Med
2004;32:1384—90.
333. Buunk G, van der Hoeven JG, Meinders AE. Cerebrovascular
reactivity in comatose patients resuscitated from a cardiac
arrest. Stroke 1997;28:1569—73.
334. Buunk G, van der Hoeven JG, Meinders AE. A comparison
of near-infrared spectroscopy and jugular bulb oximetry
in comatose patients resuscitated from a cardiac arrest.
Anaesthesia 1998;53:13—9.
335. Roine RO, Launes J, Nikkinen P, Lindroth L, Kaste M.
Regional cerebral blood flow after human cardiac arrest. A
hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime single photon emission
computed tomographic study. Arch Neurol 1991;48:625—9.
336. Beckstead JE, Tweed WA, Lee J, MacKeen WL. Cerebral
blood flow and metabolism in man following cardiac arrest.
Stroke 1978;9:569—73.
337. Laurent I, Monchi M, Chiche JD, et al. Reversible myocar-
dial dysfunction in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:2110—6.
338. Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Rhee KH, Berg RA. Myocardial dys-
function after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: an exam-
ple of global myocardial stunning. J Am Coll Cardiol
1996;28:232—40.
339. Adrie C, Adib-Conquy M, Laurent I, et al. Successful
cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest as a
‘‘sepsis-like’’ syndrome. Circulation 2002;106:562—8.
340. Mullner M, Sterz F, Binder M, et al. Arterial blood pres-
sure after human cardiac arrest and neurological recovery.
Stroke 1996;27:59—62.
341. Angelos MG, Ward KR, Hobson J, Beckley PD. Organ blood
flow following cardiac arrest in a swine low-flow cardiopul-
monary bypass model. Resuscitation 1994;27:245—54.
342. Rello J, Diaz E, Roque M, Valles J. Risk factors for develop-
ing pneumonia within 48 hours of intubation. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med 1999;159:1742—6.
343. Krumholz A, Stern BJ, Weiss HD. Outcome from coma after
cardiopulmonary resuscitation: relation to seizures and
myoclonus. Neurology 1988;38:401—5.
344. Wijdicks EF, Parisi JE, Sharbrough FW. Prognostic value of
myoclonus status in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.
Ann Neurol 1994;35:239—43.
345. Takino M, Okada Y. Hyperthermia following cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Intensive Care Med 1991;17:419—20.
346. Hickey RW, Kochanek PM, Ferimer H, Alexander HL, Gar-
man RH, Graham SH. Induced hyperthermia exacerbates
neurologic neuronal histologic damage after asphyxial car-
diac arrest in rats. Crit Care Med 2003;31:531—5.
347. Takasu A, Saitoh D, Kaneko N, Sakamoto T, Okada Y. Hyper-
thermia: is it an ominous sign after cardiac arrest? Resus-
citation 2001;49:273—7.
348. Zeiner A, Holzer M, Sterz F, et al. Hyperthermia after car-
diac arrest is associated with an unfavorable neurologic
outcome. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2007—12.
349. Coimbra C, Boris-Moller F, Drake M, Wieloch T. Dimin-
ished neuronal damage in the rat brain by late treat-
ment with the antipyretic drug dipyrone or cooling fol-
lowing cerebral ischemia. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1996;92:
447—53.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
350. Coimbra C, Drake M, Boris-Moller F, Wieloch T. Long-lasting
neuroprotective effect of postischemic hypothermia and
treatment with an anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drug: evi-
dence for chronic encephalopathic processes following
ischemia. Stroke 1996;27:1578—85.
351. Colbourne F, Sutherland G, Corbett D. Postischemic
hypothermia. A critical appraisal with implications for clin-
ical treatment. Mol Neurobiol 1997;14:171—201.
352. Ginsberg MD, Sternau LL, Globus MY, Dietrich WD, Busto
R. Therapeutic modulation of brain temperature: rele-
vance to ischemic brain injury. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab
Rev 1992;4:189—225.
353. Safar PJ, Kochanek PM. Therapeutic hypothermia after car-
diac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002;346:612—3.
354. Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild ther-
apeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome
after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002;346:549—56.
355. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of
comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with
induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:557—63.
356. Hachimi-Idrissi S, Corne L, Ebinger G, Michotte Y, Huyghens
L. Mild hypothermia induced by a helmet device: a clinical
feasibility study. Resuscitation 2001;51:275—81.
357. Bernard SA, Jones BM, Horne MK. Clinical trial of induced
hypothermia in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:146—53.
358. Bernard S, Buist M, Monteiro O, Smith K. Induced hypother-
mia using large volume, ice-cold intravenous fluid in
comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a pre-
liminary report. Resuscitation 2003;56:9—13.
359. Virkkunen I, Yli-Hankala A, Silfvast T. Induction of ther-
apeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in prehospital
patients using ice-cold Ringer’s solution: a pilot study.
Resuscitation 2004;62:299—302.
360. Al-Senani FM, Graffagnino C, Grotta JC, et al. A prospec-
tive, multicenter pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and
safety of using the CoolGard System and Icy catheter fol-
lowing cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2004;62:143—50.
361. Kliegel A, Losert H, Sterz F, et al. Cold simple intravenous
infusions preceding special endovascular cooling for faster
induction of mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest—–a fea-
sibility study. Resuscitation 2005;64:347—51.
362. Kim F, Olsufka M, Carlbom D, et al. Pilot study of rapid infu-
sion of 2 L of 4 degrees C normal saline for induction of mild
hypothermia in hospitalized, comatose survivors of out-of-
hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005;112:715—9.
363. Schmutzhard E, Engelhardt K, Beer R, et al. Safety and
efficacy of a novel intravascular cooling device to control
body temperature in neurologic intensive care patients: a
prospective pilot study. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2481—8.
364. Diringer MN, Reaven NL, Funk SE, Uman GC. Elevated
body temperature independently contributes to increased
length of stay in neurologic intensive care unit patients.
Crit Care Med 2004;32:1489—95.
365. Keller E, Imhof HG, Gasser S, Terzic A, Yonekawa Y.
Endovascular cooling with heat exchange catheters: a new
method to induce and maintain hypothermia. Intensive
Care Med 2003;29:939—43.
366. Polderman KH, Peerdeman SM, Girbes AR. Hypophos-
phatemia and hypomagnesemia induced by cooling
in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg
2001;94:697—705.
367. Polderman KH. Application of therapeutic hypothermia
in the intensive care unit. Opportunities and pitfalls
of a promising treatment modality—–Part 2. Practical
aspects and side effects. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:
757—69.
S85
368. Agnew DM, Koehler RC, Guerguerian AM, et al. Hypother-
mia for 24 hours after asphyxic cardiac arrest in
piglets provides striatal neuroprotection that is sus-
tained 10 days after rewarming. Pediatr Res 2003;54:
253—62.
369. Hicks SD, DeFranco DB, Callaway CW. Hypothermia
during reperfusion after asphyxial cardiac arrest improves
functional recovery and selectively alters stress-
induced protein expression. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
2000;20:520—30.
370. Sterz F, Safar P, Tisherman S, Radovsky A, Kuboyama K,
Oku K. Mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation
improves outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs.
Crit Care Med 1991;19:379—89.
371. Xiao F, Safar P, Radovsky A. Mild protective and resuscita-
tive hypothermia for asphyxial cardiac arrest in rats. Am J
Emerg Med 1998;16:17—25.
372. Katz LM, Young A, Frank JE, Wang Y, Park K. Neurotensin-
induced hypothermia improves neurologic outcome after
hypoxic-ischemia. Crit Care Med 2004;32:806—10.
373. Abella BS, Zhao D, Alvarado J, Hamann K, Vanden
Hoek TL, Becker LB. Intra-arrest cooling improves out-
comes in a murine cardiac arrest model. Circulation
2004;109:2786—91.
374. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Vanden Hoek TL, Hickey RW. Therapeu-
tic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. An advisory statement
by the Advancement Life support Task Force of the Inter-
national Liaison committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation
2003;57:231—5.
375. Baird TA, Parsons MW, Phanh T, et al. Persistent post-
stroke hyperglycemia is independently associated with
infarct expansion and worse clinical outcome. Stroke
2003;34:2208—14.
376. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Pathak P, Gerstein HC.
Stress hyperglycemia and prognosis of stroke in nondia-
betic and diabetic patients: a systematic overview. Stroke
2001;32:2426—32.
377. Scott JF, Robinson GM, French JM, O’Connell JE, Alberti
KG, Gray CS. Glucose potassium insulin infusions in the
treatment of acute stroke patients with mild to moderate
hyperglycemia: the Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial (GIST).
Stroke 1999;30:793—9.
378. Yip PK, He YY, Hsu CY, Garg N, Marangos P, Hogan EL. Effect
of plasma glucose on infarct size in focal cerebral ischemia-
reperfusion. Neurology 1991;41:899—905.
379. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive
insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med
2001;345:1359—67.
380. Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management pro-
tocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients. Mayo
Clin Proc 2004;79:992—1000.
381. Van den Berghe G, Wouters PJ, Bouillon R, et al. Out-
come benefit of intensive insulin therapy in the critically
ill: insulin dose versus glycemic control. Crit Care Med
2003;31:359—66.
382. Katz LM, Wang Y, Ebmeyer U, Radovsky A, Safar P. Glu-
cose plus insulin infusion improves cerebral outcome after
asphyxial cardiac arrest. Neuroreport 1998;9:3363—7.
383. Laver S, Farrow C, Turner D, Nolan J. Mode of death after
admission to an intensive care unit following cardiac arrest.
Intensive Care Med 2004;30:2126—8.
384. Zandbergen EG, de Haan RJ, Stoutenbeek CP, Koel-
man JH, Hijdra A. Systematic review of early predic-
tion of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic coma. Lancet
1998;352:1808—12.
385. Booth CM, Boone RH, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS. Is this patient
dead, vegetative, or severely neurologically impaired?
S86
Assessing outcome for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.
Jama 2004;291:870—9.
386. Edgren E, Hedstrand U, Kelsey S, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Safar
P. Assessment of neurological prognosis in comatose sur-
vivors of cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet
1994;343:1055—9.
387. Tiainen M, Roine RO, Pettila V, Takkunen O. Serum
neuron-specific enolase and S-100B protein in car-
diac arrest patients treated with hypothermia. Stroke
2003;34:2881—6.
388. Fogel W, Krieger D, Veith M, et al. Serum neuron-specific
enolase as early predictor of outcome after cardiac arrest.
Crit Care Med 1997;25:1133—8.
389. Mussack T, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG, et al. Serum S-100B
and interleukin-8 as predictive markers for comparative
neurologic outcome analysis of patients after cardiac
arrest and severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med
2002;30:2669—74.
390. Mussack T, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG, Wiedemann E, Gippner-
Steppert C, Jochum M. S-100b, sE-selectin, and sP-selectin
for evaluation of hypoxic brain damage in patients after
cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pilot study. World J Surg
2001;25:539—43 [discussion 44].
391. Rosen H, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L. CSF levels of neurofil-
ament is a valuable predictor of long-term outcome after
cardiac arrest. J Neurol Sci 2004;221:19—24.
392. Rosen H, Rosengren L, Herlitz J, Blomstrand C. Increased
serum levels of the S-100 protein are associated with
hypoxic brain damage after cardiac arrest. Stroke
1998;29:473—7.
393. Meynaar IA, Straaten HM, van der Wetering J, et al. Serum
neuron-specific enolase predicts outcome in post-anoxic
coma: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med
2003;29:189—95.
394. Rosen H, Sunnerhagen KS, Herlitz J, Blomstrand C, Rosen-
gren L. Serum levels of the brain-derived proteins S-100
and NSE predict long-term outcome after cardiac arrest.
Resuscitation 2001;49:183—91.
395. Schreiber W, Herkner H, Koreny M, et al. Predictors of sur-
vival in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarc-
tion requiring continuous catecholamine support. Resusci-
tation 2002;55:269—76.
396. Schoerkhuber W, Kittler H, Sterz F, et al. Time course of
serum neuron-specific enolase. A predictor of neurologi-
cal outcome in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.
Stroke 1999;30:1598—603.
397. Bottiger BW, Mobes S, Glatzer R, et al. Astroglial protein
S-100 is an early and sensitive marker of hypoxic brain
damage and outcome after cardiac arrest in humans. Cir-
culation 2001;103:2694—8.
398. Martens P, Raabe A, Johnsson P, Serum. S-100 and neuron-
specific enolase for prediction of regaining consciousness
after global cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1998;29:2363—6.
399. Zingler VC, Krumm B, Bertsch T, Fassbender K, Pohlmann-
Eden B. Early prediction of neurological outcome after car-
J.P. Nolan et al.
diopulmonary resuscitation: a multimodal approach com-
bining neurobiochemical and electrophysiological investi-
gations may provide high prognostic certainty in patients
after cardiac arrest. Eur Neurol 2003;49:79—84.
400. Zandbergen EG, de Haan RJ, Hijdra A. Systematic review of
prediction of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic coma with
biochemical markers of brain damage. Intensive Care Med
2001;27:1661—7.
401. Synek VM. Validity of a revised EEG coma scale for pre-
dicting survival in anoxic encephalopathy. Clin Exp Neurol
1989;26:119—27.
402. Moller M, Holm B, Sindrup E, Nielsen BL. Electroencephalo-
graphic prediction of anoxic brain damage after resuscita-
tion from cardiac arrest in patients with acute myocardial
infarction. Acta Med Scand 1978;203:31—7.
403. Scollo-Lavizzari G, Bassetti C. Prognostic value of EEG
in post-anoxic coma after cardiac arrest. Eur Neurol
1987;26:161—70.
404. Bassetti C, Karbowski K. Prognostic value of electroen-
cephalography in non-traumatic comas. Schweiz Med
Wochenschr 1990;120:1425—34.
405. Bassetti C, Bomio F, Mathis J, Hess CW. Early prognosis
in coma after cardiac arrest: a prospective clinical, elec-
trophysiological, and biochemical study of 60 patients. J
Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:610—5.
406. Rothstein TL. Recovery from near death following cerebral
anoxia: a case report demonstrating superiority of median
somatosensory evoked potentials over EEG in predicting
a favorable outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Resuscitation 2004;60:335—41.
407. Berkhoff M, Donati F, Bassetti C. Postanoxic alpha (theta)
coma: a reappraisal of its prognostic significance. Clin Neu-
rophysiol 2000;111:297—304.
408. Kaplan PW, Genoud D, Ho TW, Jallon P. Etiology, neurologic
correlations, and prognosis in alpha coma. Clin Neurophys-
iol 1999;110:205—13.
409. Yamashita S, Morinaga T, Ohgo S, et al. Prognostic value
of electroencephalogram (EEG) in anoxic encephalopathy
after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: relationship among
anoxic period, EEG grading and outcome. Intern Med
1995;34:71—6.
410. Ajisaka H. Early electroencephalographic findings in
patients with anoxic encephalopathy after cardiopul-
monary arrest and successful resusitation. J Clin Neurosci
2004;11:616—8.
411. Rothstein TL, Thomas EM, Sumi SM. Predicting outcome in
hypoxic-ischemic coma. A prospective clinical and elec-
trophysiologic study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
1991;79:101—7.
412. Edgren E, Hedstrand U, Nordin M, Rydin E, Ronquist G.
Prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med
1987;15:820—5.
413. Sorensen K, Thomassen A, Wernberg M. Prognostic signifi-
cance of alpha frequency EEG rhythm in coma after cardiac
arrest. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:840—2.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S87—S96
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 5. Initial management of acute
coronary syndromes
Hans-Richard Arntz, Leo Bossaert, Gerasimos S. Filippatos
Introduction
The incidence of acute myocardial infarction
(AMI) is decreasing in many European countries.1
Although in-hospital mortality from AMI has been
reduced significantly by modern reperfusion ther-
apy and improved secondary prophylaxis,1 the over-
all 28-day mortality is virtually unchanged because
about two thirds of those that die do so before
arrival at hospital.2 Thus, the best chance of
improving survival after AMI is by improving treat-
ment in the early, and particularly the out-of hos-
pital, phase of the disease.
The term acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encom-
passes three different entities within the acute
manifestation of coronary heart disease: ST eleva-
tion myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST eleva-
tion myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable
angina pectoris (UAP) (Figure 5.1). The common
pathophysiology of ACS is a ruptured or eroded
atherosclerotic plaque.3 Electrocardiographic char-
acteristics (absence or presence of ST elevation)
differentiate STEMI from the other forms of ACS.
A NSTEMI or UAP may present with ST segment
depression or non-specific ST segment wave abnor-
malities, or even a normal ECG. In the absence of
ST elevation, an increase in the plasma concentra-
tion of cardiac markers, particularly troponin T or
I as the most specific markers of myocardial cell
necrosis, indicates NSTEMI.
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.003
Acute coronary syndromes are the commonest
cause of malignant arrhythmias leading to sudden
cardiac death. The therapeutic goals are to treat
acute life-threatening conditions, such as ventricu-
lar fibrillation (VF) or extreme bradycardias, and to
preserve left ventricular function and prevent heart
failure by minimising the extent of any myocar-
dial infarction. These guidelines address the first
hours after onset of symptoms. Out-of-hospital
treatment and initial therapy in the emergency
department may vary according to local capabili-
ties, resources and regulations. The data supporting
out-of-hospital treatment are usually extrapolated
from studies of initial treatment early after hospital
admission; there are only few high-quality out-of-
hospital studies. Comprehensive guidelines for the
diagnosis and treatment of ACS with and without
ST elevation have been published by the European
Society of Cardiology and the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association.4,5 The cur-
rent recommendations are in line with these guide-
lines.
Diagnostic tests in acute coronary
syndromes
Since early treatment offers the greatest benefits,
and myocardial ischaemia is the leading precipitant
of sudden cardiac death, it is essential that the
S88
Figure 5.1 Classification of acute coronary syndromes.
public are aware of the typical symptoms associ-
ated with ACS. Patients at risk, and their families,
should be able to recognise characteristic symp-
toms such as chest pain, which may radiate into
other areas of the upper body, often accompanied
by other symptoms including dyspnoea, sweating,
nausea or vomiting and syncope. They should under-
stand the importance of early activation of the
emergency medical service (EMS) system and, ide-
ally, should be trained in basic life support (BLS).
EMS dispatchers must be trained to recognize
ACS symptoms and to ask targeted questions. When
an ACS is suspected, an EMS crew trained in
advanced life support (ALS) and capable of mak-
ing the diagnosis and starting treatment should
be alerted. The sensitivity, specificity and clinical
impact of various diagnostic strategies have been
evaluated for ACS/AMI. These include signs and
symptoms, the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
and biochemical markers of cardiac risk.
Signs and symptoms of ACS/AMI
Even though typical symptoms such as radiating
chest pain, shortness of breath or sweating may be
more intense and generally last longer in patients
with AMI, they are not adequately specific for a
reliable diagnosis of AMI. A 12-lead ECG, cardiac
biomarkers and other diagnostic tests are required
before ACS or AMI can be ruled out in the presence
of a typical history. Atypical symptoms or unusual
H.-R. Arntz et al.
presentations may occur in the elderly, in females,
and in people with diabetes.6,7
12-lead ECG
A 12-lead ECG is the key investigation for assess-
ment of an ACS. In case of STEMI, a 12-lead ECG can
indicate the need for immediate reperfusion ther-
apy (e.g., primary percutaneous coronary interven-
tion (PCI) or prehospital thrombolysis). Recording
of a 12-lead ECG out-of-hospital enables advanced
notification to the receiving facility and expe-
dites treatment decisions after hospital arrival;
in many studies, the time from hospital admis-
sion to initiating reperfusion therapy is reduced by
10—60 min.8—10 Recording and transmission of diag-
nostic quality ECGs to the hospital takes usually
less than 5 min. Trained EMS personnel (emergency
physicians, paramedics and nurses) can identify
STEMI, defined by ST elevation of ≥0.1 mV eleva-
tion in at least two adjacent limb leads or >0.2 mV in
two adjacent precordial leads, with high specificity
and sensitivity comparable to diagnostic accuracy
in the hospital.11—13
Biomarkers
In the presence of a suggestive history, the absence
of ST elevation on the ECG, and elevated concen-
trations of biomarkers (troponin T and troponin
I, CK, CK-MB, myoglobin) characterise non-STEMI
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
and distinguish it from STEMI and unstable angina,
respectively.3 Elevated concentrations of troponin
are particularly helpful in identifying patients at
increased risk of adverse outcome.14 However,
the delay in release of biomarkers from dam-
aged myocardium prevents their use in diagnosing
myocardial infarction in the first 4—6 h after the
onset of symptoms.15
Principles of acute treatment for ACS
Nitrates
Glyceryl trinitrate is an effective treatment for
ischaemic chest pain (Figure 5.2) and has some
beneficial haemodynamic effects, e.g., dilation of
the venous capacitance vessels, coronary arteries
and, to a minor degree, peripheral arteries. Glyc-
eryl trinitrate may be considered if the systolic
blood pressure is higher than 90 mmHg and the
patient has ongoing ischaemic chest pain. Glyc-
eryl trinitrate can be useful in the treatment of
acute pulmonary congestion. Do not use nitrates in
patients with hypotension (systolic blood pressure
≤90 mmHg), particularly if combined with brady-
cardia, nor in patients with inferior infarction and
suspected right ventricular involvement. Use of
nitrates under these circumstances may cause a
precipitous decrease in blood pressure and cardiac
output.
Figure 5.2 Early treatment of patients with signs/symptoms of ACS.
S89
Morphine
Morphine is the analgesic of choice for nitrate-
refractory pain. Being a dilator of venous capac-
itance vessels, it may have additional benefit in
patients with pulmonary congestion. Give morphine
in initial doses of 3—5 mg intravenously and repeat
every few minutes until the patient is pain free.
Oxygen
Give supplementary oxygen (4—8 l min−1 ) to all
patients with arterial oxygen saturation <90%
and/or pulmonary congestion. Despite lack of proof
for long-term benefit of supplementary oxygen,16
give it to all patients with uncomplicated STEMI; it
will benefit patients with unrecognised hypoxia.
Acetylsalicylic acid
Several large randomised controlled trials indi-
cate decreased mortality when acetylsalicylic acid
(ASA), 75—325 mg, is given to patients in hospital
with ACS.17,18 A few studies have suggested reduced
mortality if ASA is given earlier.19 Therefore, give
ASA as soon as possible to all patients with sus-
pected ACS unless the patient has a known true
allergy to ASA. The initial dose of ASA to be chewed
is 160—325 mg. Other forms of ASA (soluble, IV) may
be as effective as chewed tablets.20
S90
Reperfusion therapy
Reperfusion therapy is the most important advance
in the treatment of AMI in the last 20 years.
Large clinical trials have proven that fibrinolytic
therapy in ACS patients with STEMI or new or
presumed new LBBB, who present within 12 h of
onset of symptoms, reduces short- and long-term
mortality.17,21—23 The benefit achieved with fibri-
nolytic therapy is profoundly time dependent; it
is particularly effective if given within the first 3 h
of the onset of symptoms.17,21,22,24 The efficacy of
primary PCI is also time-sensitive but less so than
fibrinolysis.25
Out-of-hospital fibrinolysis
A meta-analysis of six trials involving 6434 patients
documented a 17% decrease in the mortality among
patients treated with out-of-hospital fibrinolysis
compared with in-hospital fibrinolysis.26 The aver-
age time gained by out-of-hospital fibrinolysis was
60 min, and the results were independent of the
experience of the provider. Thus, giving fibrinolyt-
ics out-of-hospital to patients with STEMI or signs
and symptoms of an ACS with presumed new LBBB is
beneficial. Fibrinolytic therapy can be given safely
by trained paramedics, nurses or physicians using
an established protocol.27—29 The efficacy is great-
est within the first 3 h of the onset of symptoms.
An effective and safe system for out-of-hospital
thrombolytic therapy requires adequate facilities
for the diagnosis and treatment of STEMI and its
complications. Ideally, there should be a capability
to communicate with experienced hospital doctors
(e.g., emergency physicians or cardiologists).
Patients with symptoms of ACS and ECG evidence
of STEMI (or presumably new LBBB or true posterior
infarction) presenting directly to the emergency
department should be given fibrinolytic therapy as
soon as possible unless there is immediate access
to primary PCI within 90 min.
Risks of fibrinolytic therapy
Healthcare professionals who give fibrinolytic
therapy must be aware of its contraindications
(Table 5.1) and risks. Patients with large AMIs (e.g.,
indicated by extensive ECG changes) are likely to
derive the greatest benefit from fibrinolytic ther-
apy. Benefits of fibrinolytic therapy are less impres-
sive in inferior wall infarctions than in anterior
infarctions. Older patients have an absolute higher
risk of death, but the absolute benefit of fibrinolytic
therapy is similar to that of younger patients.
Patients over 75 years of age have an increased
H.-R. Arntz et al.
Table 5.1 Contraindications for thrombolysisa .
Absolute contraindications
Haemorrhagic stroke or stroke of unknown origin
at any time
Ischaemic stroke in the preceding 6 months
Central nervous system damage or neoplasms
Recent major trauma/surgery/head injury (within
the preceding 3 weeks)
Gastro-intestinal bleeding within the last month
Known bleeding disorder
Aortic dissection
Relative contraindications
Transient ischaemic attack in preceding 6 months
Oral anticoagulant therapy
Pregnancy within 1 week post partum
Non-compressible punctures
Traumatic resuscitation
Refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure
>180 mmHg
Advanced liver disease
Infective endocarditis
Active peptic ulcer
a According to the guidelines of the European Society of
Cardiology.
risk of intracranial bleeding from fibrinolysis; thus,
the absolute benefit of thrombolysis is reduced by
this complication.30 The risk of intracranial bleed-
ing in patients with a systolic blood pressure of over
180 mmHg is increased; this degree of hypertension
is a relative contraindication to fibrinolytic therapy.
The intracranial bleeding risk also depends in part
on which fibrinolytic drug is used; the total mor-
tality is lower with the more fibrin-specific throm-
bolytics (alteplase, tenecteplase, reteplase), but
the intracranial bleeding risk is lower with strep-
tokinase. The risk of intracranial bleeding is also
increased by the use of antithrombotic therapy,
particularly heparin.
Primary percutaneous intervention
Coronary angioplasty with or without stent place-
ment has become the first-line treatment for
patients with STEMI, because it has been shown
to be superior to fibrinolysis in the combined end-
points of death, stroke and reinfarction in sev-
eral studies and meta-analyses.31,32 This improve-
ment was found when primary PCI was undertaken
by a skilled person in a high-volume centre (i.e.,
>75 procedures per operator per year), with a
delay of balloon inflation of not more than 90 min
after first contact. In the randomised studies com-
paring primary PCI and fibrinolytic therapy, the
typical delay from decision to the beginning of
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
treatment with either primary PCI or fibrinolytic
therapy was less than 60 min; however, in registries
that reflect standard practice more realistically,
the delay was often longer. One study33 and one
post hoc analysis34 comparing fibrinolytic therapy
with primary PCI showed no difference in survival
if fibrinolytic therapy was initiated within 2 or 3 h
of onset of symptoms.
All patients presenting with STEMI and symptoms
of ACS and presumably new LBBB presenting within
12 h after onset of symptoms should be evaluated
for reperfusion therapy (fibrinolytic therapy or PCI).
Primary PCI is preferred in patients with symptom
duration of over 3 h, if a skilled team can under-
take it within 90 min after first patient contact, and
in all patients who have contraindications to fibri-
nolytic therapy. If the duration of symptoms is less
than 3 h, treatment is more time-sensitive and the
superiority of out-of-hospital fibrinolytic therapy,
immediate in-hospital fibrinolytic therapy or trans-
fer for primary PCI is not yet established clearly.
Triage and interfacility transfer for primary PCI.
The risk of death, reinfarction or stroke is reduced
if patients with STEMI are transferred promptly
from community hospitals to tertiary care facilities
for primary PCI.35 It is unclear whether immedi-
ate fibrinolytic therapy (in- or out-of-hospital) or
transfer for primary PCI is superior for patients
presenting with STEMI with a symptom duration of
<2—3 h.33,34 Transfer of STEMI patients for primary
PCI is reasonable for those presenting later than 3 h
but less than 12 h after onset of symptoms, pro-
vided that the transfer can be achieved rapidly.
Optimally, primary PCI should occur within 90 min
from the first contact with the healthcare provider
deciding to treat or transfer.
Interfacility transfer for early PCI after fibrinolytic
therapy. Older studies, that did not include mod-
ern adjunctive drugs and PCI techniques with stent-
ing, do not support a strategy of fibrinolytic therapy
combined with early PCI. In contrast, several recent
smaller studies support a strategy of in-hospital
fibrinolytic therapy in a peripheral hospital fol-
lowed by transfer for PCI within 24 h of fibrinolytic
therapy.36,37 The timing of PCI after fibrinolytic
therapy, the use of coronary stents and control-
group interventions differ widely among these tri-
als.
There is insufficient evidence to recommend rou-
tine transfer of patients for early PCI after suc-
cessful fibrinolytic therapy. Transfer for early PCI
after is recommended for patients in cardiogenic
shock, particularly for those younger than 75 years
and for those who are haemodynamically unstable
S91
or have persistent ischaemic symptoms after fibri-
nolytic therapy.
Cardiogenic shock
Cardiogenic shock (and to some extent, severe left
ventricular failure) is one of the complications of
ACS and has a mortality rate of more than 50%.
Cardiogenic shock in STEMI is not a contraindica-
tion to fibrinolytic therapy, but PCI is preferable.
Early revascularisation (i.e., primary or facilitated
PCI or surgery) is indicated for those patients who
develop shock within 36 h after symptom onset of
AMI and are suitable for revascularisation.38,39
Suspect right ventricular infarction in patients
with inferior infarction, clinical shock and clear
lung fields. ST segment elevation ≥1 mm in lead
V4R is a useful indicator of right ventricular infarc-
tion. These patients have an in-hospital mortality of
up to 30%, and many benefit greatly from reperfu-
sion therapy (fibrinolytic therapy and/or PCI). Avoid
nitrates and other vasodilators, and treat hypoten-
sion with intravenous fluid.
Adjunctive treatment in reperfusion
therapy in ACS
Heparin
Heparin is an indirect inhibitor of thrombin, which
in combination with ASA is used as an adjunct
with fibrinolytic therapy or primary PCI and as an
important part of treatment of unstable angina
and STEMI. Limitations of unfractionated heparin
include its unpredictable anticoagulant effect in
individual patients, the need for it to be given
intravenously and the need to monitor aPTT. More-
over, heparin can induce thrombocytopenia. Low-
molecular-weight heparin has a more predictable
anticoagulant effect with lower rates of thrombocy-
topenia. It can be given subcutaneously in a weight-
adjusted dose and does not require laboratory mon-
itoring. Low-molecular-weight heparins may accu-
mulate in patients with impaired renal function.
Unfractionated heparin versus
low-molecular-weight heparin in NSTEMI
In comparison with unfractionated heparin (UFH),
low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxa-
parin) reduces the combined endpoint of mortal-
ity, myocardial infarction and the need for urgent
revascularisation, if given within the first 24—36 h
of onset of symptoms of NSTEMI/UAP.40—42 Although
LMWH increases the incidence of minor bleed-
ing, in comparison with UFH, the incidence of
S92
serious bleeding is not increased. Early treatment
with LMWH (enoxaparin) is the preferred therapy
for patients with NSTEMI/UAP in addition to ASA,
whenever a non-interventional strategy is planned.
Consider UFH if reperfusion is planned in the
first 24—36 h after symptom onset. Optimal target
value of aPPT is 50—70 s. Avoid switching between
UFH and LMWH, because it may increase bleeding
complications.43
Unfractionated heparin versus
low-molecular-weight heparin in STEMI
Two large randomised controlled thrombolysis stud-
ies comparing LMWH with UFH demonstrated a
reduced frequency of ischaemic complications
when given to patients with STEMI within 6 h of
the onset of symptoms.44,45 This must be balanced
against the increase in intracranial haemorrhage in
patients over 75 years of age who receive LMWH.45
There is no evidence to support giving LMWH to
patients with STEMI proceeding to an invasive strat-
egy. Thus, LMWH is an acceptable alternative to
UFH as an ancillary therapy for patients younger
than 75 years without significant renal dysfunction
who are treated with fibrinolytic therapy. UFH is
recommended as an ancillary therapy to fibrinolytic
therapy in elderly patients and any STEMI patient
for whom revascularisation is planned. The optimal
target value of aPPT is 50—70 s. The use of hep-
arin (preferably LMWH) depends partly on which
fibrinolytic drug is used. Heparin is needed after
shorter-acting drugs because of the rebound hyper-
coagulable state that occurs after a few hours,
but not after streptokinase because the fibrinolytic
effect of streptokinase lasts for about 48 h.
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors
The platelet glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa receptor is
the final common pathway to platelet aggregation.
The synthetic substances eptifibatide and tirofiban
modulate this receptor activity reversibly, whereas
the receptor antibody abciximab blocks it irre-
versibly.
Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTEMI/unstable angina.
The incidences of death and recurrent ischaemia
are reduced when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors are added
to standard therapy including ASA and heparin
in high-risk patients with UAP/NSTEMI treated
with mechanical reperfusion.46 High-risk features
include persistent pain, haemodynamic or rhythm
instability, diabetes, acute or dynamic ECG changes
and any elevation in cardiac troponins. Tirofiban
or eptifibatide failed to reduce death or recur-
H.-R. Arntz et al.
rent ischaemia in patients with UA/NSTEMI with-
out mechanical perfusion, but showed a reduc-
tion in 30-day mortality in a later meta-analysis.46
In patients with UA/NSTEMI, abciximab, given in
addition to standard therapy without mechanical
intervention, resulted in a trend towards a worse
outcome.47 Therefore, in high-risk patients, give
Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in addition to standard ther-
apy in patients for whom revascularisation ther-
apy is planned. If revascularisation therapy is not
planned, tirofiban and eptifibatide can be given to
high-risk NSTEMI/UAP patients in conjunction with
ASA and LMWH. Do not give abciximab if PCI is not
planned.
Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI. Gp IIb/IIIa receptor
blockers in combination with a reduced dose of fib-
rinolytics do not reduce mortality in patients with
STEMI, but increase bleeding risk in patients over
75 years of age.44,48 Abciximab reduces mortality
when given to patients with STEMI and planned
primary PCI, but is not beneficial in patients not
proceeding to primary PCI.46 Prehospital use of
abciximab may improve the patency of the infarct-
related artery with regard to PCI.49 There is no
benefit in giving tirofiban in addition to stan-
dard therapy out of hospital or in the emergency
department.50 Abciximab may be helpful in reduc-
ing short-term mortality and short-term reinfarc-
tion in patients treated with PCI without fibrinolytic
therapy. Abciximab is not recommended in combi-
nation with fibrinolytics in patients with STEMI.
Clopidogrel
Clopidogrel inhibits the platelet ADP receptor irre-
versibly, which further reduces platelet aggregation
in addition to that produced by ASA. Compared
with ASA, there is no increased risk of bleeding
with clopidogrel.51 If given in addition to hep-
arin and ASA within 4 h of presentation, clopi-
dogrel improves outcome in patients with high-
risk ACS.52,53 There is a significant reduction in
adverse ischaemic events at 28 days after elective
PCI when clopidogrel is given at least 6 h before
intervention.54 A recent trial documented a signif-
icant reduction in the composite endpoint of an
occluded infarct-related artery (TIMI flow grade 0
or 1) on angiography or death or recurrent myocar-
dial infarction before angiography, when clopido-
grel (300 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg daily
dose up to 8 days in hospital) is given to patients up
to 75 years of age with STEMI who are treated with
fibrinolytic therapy, ASA and heparin.55
Give a 300-mg oral loading dose of clopidogrel
early, as well as standard care, to patients with
ACS if they have an increase in serum cardiac
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
biomarkers and/or new ECG changes consistent
with ischaemia when a medical approach or PCI is
planned. Give clopidogrel to patients with STEMI
up to 75 years of age receiving fibrinolytic therapy,
ASA and heparin. Clopidogrel, 300 mg, can be given
instead of ASA to patients with a suspected ACS who
have a true allergy to or gastrointestinal intoler-
ance of ASA.
Primary and secondary prevention
interventions
Start preventive interventions, at the latest, at the
initial admission with a confirmed diagnosis of ACS.
Give a beta-blocker as soon as possible unless con-
traindicated or poorly tolerated. Treat all patients
with a statin (HRG co-enzyme A reductase inhibitor)
unless contraindicated or poorly tolerated. Start an
ACE inhibitor in all patients with STEMI, all patients
with STEMI and left ventricular systolic impair-
ment, and consider it in all other patients with
STEMI unless contraindicated or poorly tolerated.
In patients unable to tolerate an ACE inhibitor, an
angiotensin receptor blocker may be used as a sub-
stitute in those patients with left ventricular sys-
tolic impairment.
Beta-blockers
Several studies, undertaken mainly in the pre-
reperfusion era, indicate decreased mortality and
incidence of reinfarction and cardiac rupture as
well as a lower incidence of VF and supraventric-
ular arrhythmia in patients treated early with a
beta-blocker.56,57 Intravenous beta-blockade may
also reduce mortality in patients undergoing pri-
mary PCI who are not on oral beta-blockers.58
Haemodynamically stable patients presenting
with an ACS should be given intravenous beta-
blockers promptly, followed by regular oral therapy
unless contraindicated or poorly tolerated. Con-
traindications to beta-blockers include hypoten-
sion, bradycardia, second- or third-degree AV block,
moderate to severe congestive heart failure and
severe reactive airway disease. Give a beta-blocker
irrespective of the need for early revascularisation
therapy.
Anti-arrhythmics
Apart from the use of a beta-blocker as recom-
mended above, there is no evidence to support
the use of anti-arrhythmic prophylaxis after ACS.
VF accounts for most of the early deaths from
ACS; the incidence of VF is highest in the first
S93
hours after onset of symptoms.59,60 This explains
why numerous studies have been performed with
the aim of demonstrating the prophylactic effect
of anti-arrhythmic therapy. The effects of anti-
arrhythmic drugs (lidocaine, magnesium, disopy-
ramide, mexiletine, verapamil) given prophylacti-
cally to patients with ACS have been studied.61—63
Prophylaxis with lidocaine reduces the incidence
of VF but may increase mortality.58 Routine treat-
ment with magnesium in patients with AMI does
not improve mortality.64 Arrhythmia prophylaxis
using disopyramide, mexiletine or verapamil, given
within the first hours of an ACS, does not improve
mortality.63 In contrast, intravenous beta-blockers
reduced the incidence of VF when given to patients
with ACS.56,57
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
and angiotensin-II receptor blockers
Oral angiotensin-converting inhibitors (ACE) inhibi-
tors reduce mortality when given to patients with
acute myocardial infarction with or without early
reperfusion therapy.65,66 The beneficial effects are
most pronounced in patients presenting with ante-
rior infarction, pulmonary congestion or left ven-
tricular ejection fraction <40%.66 Do not give ACE
inhibitors if the systolic blood pressure is less than
100 mmHg at admission or if there is a known con-
traindication to these drugs.66 A trend towards
higher mortality has been documented if an intra-
venous ACE inhibitor is started within the first 24 h
after onset of symptoms.67 Therefore, give an oral
ACE inhibitor within 24 h after symptom onset in
patients with AMI regardless of whether early reper-
fusion therapy is planned, particularly in those
patients with anterior infarction, pulmonary con-
gestion or left ventricular ejection fraction below
40%. Do not give intravenous ACE inhibitors within
24 h of onset of symptoms. Give an angiotensin
receptor blocker (ARB) to patients intolerant of ACE
inhibitors.
Statins
Statins reduce the incidence of major adverse car-
diovascular events when given within a few days
after onset of ACS. Start statin therapy within 24 h
of onset of symptoms of ACS. If patients are already
receiving statin therapy, do not stop it.68
References
1. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Vanuzzo D, Hobbs M, et al. Estimation
of contribution of changes in coronary care to improving
S94
survival, event rates, and coronary heart disease mortal-
ity across the WHO MONICA Project populations. Lancet
2000;355:688—700.
2. Lowel H, Meisinger C, Heier M, et al. Sex specific trends
of sudden cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction:
results of the population-based KORA/MONICA-Augsburg reg-
ister 1985 to 1998. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2002;127:2311—6.
3. European Society Cardiology. Myocardial infarction
redefined—–a consensus document of The Joint European
Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology
Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J
Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959—69.
4. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al. Management of
acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-
segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of
Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Car-
diology. Eur Heart J 2003;24:28—66.
5. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guide-
lines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction—executive summary: a report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Associa-
tion Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Commit-
tee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management
of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation
2004;110:588—636.
6. Douglas PS, Ginsburg GS. The evaluation of chest pain in
women. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1311—5.
7. Solomon CG, Lee TH, Cook EF, et al. Comparison of clinical
presentation of acute myocardial infarction in patients older
than 65 years of age to younger patients: the Multicenter
Chest Pain Study experience. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:772—6.
8. Kereiakes DJ, Gibler WB, Martin LH, Pieper KS, Anderson LC.
Relative importance of emergency medical system transport
and the prehospital electrocardiogram on reducing hospital
time delay to therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a pre-
liminary report from the Cincinnati Heart Project. Am Heart
J 1992;123(Pt 1):835—40.
9. Canto JG, Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, French WJ, Pearce DJ,
Weaver WD. The prehospital electrocardiogram in acute
myocardial infarction: is its full potential being realized?
National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. J
Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:498—505.
10. Aufderheide TP, Hendley GE, Thakur RK, et al. The diagnos-
tic impact of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography. Ann
Emerg Med 1990;19:1280—7.
11. Foster DB, Dufendach JH, Barkdoll CM, Mitchell BK. Prehos-
pital recognition of AMI using independent nurse/paramedic
12-lead ECG evaluation: impact on in-hospital times to
thrombolysis in a rural community hospital. Am J Emerg Med
1994;12:25—31.
12. Millar-Craig MW, Joy AV, Adamowicz M, Furber R, Thomas B.
Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis
of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission. Heart
1997;78:456—61.
13. Brinfield K. Identification of ST elevation AMI on prehospital
12 lead ECG; accuracy of unaided paramedic interpretation.
J Emerg Med 1998;16:22S.
14. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiac-
specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality
in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med
1996;335:1342—9.
15. Schuchert A, Hamm C, Scholz J, Klimmeck S, Goldmann B,
Meinertz T. Prehospital testing for troponin T in patients
with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J
1999;138:45—8.
16. Rawles JM, Kenmure AC. Controlled trial of oxygen in uncom-
plicated myocardial infarction. BMJ 1976;1:1121—3.
H.-R. Arntz et al.
17. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin,
both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute
myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International
Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet
1988;2:349—60.
18. Gurfinkel EP, Manos EJ, Mejail RI, et al. Low molecular weight
heparin versus regular heparin or aspirin in the treatment
of unstable angina and silent ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol
1995;26:313—8.
19. Freimark D, Matetzky S, Leor J, et al. Timing of aspirin
administration as a determinant of survival of patients with
acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Am
J Cardiol 2002;89:381—5.
20. Husted SE, Kristensen SD, Vissinger H, Morn B, Schmidt EB,
Nielsen HK. Intravenous acetylsalicylic acid—–dose-related
effects on platelet function and fibrinolysis in healthy males.
Thromb Haemost 1992;68:226—9.
21. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute
myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mor-
tality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials
of more than 1000 patients. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists’
(FTT) Collaborative Group. Lancet 1994;343:311—22.
22. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in
acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio
della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet
1986;1:397—402.
23. The GUSTO investigators. An international randomized trial
comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;329:673—82.
24. Boersma E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML. Early throm-
bolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal
of the golden hour. Lancet 1996;348:771—5.
25. De Luca G, van’t Hof AW, de Boer MJ, et al. Time-to-
treatment significantly affects the extent of ST-segment res-
olution and myocardial blush in patients with acute myocar-
dial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J
2004;25:1009—13.
26. Morrison LJ, Verbeek PR, McDonald AC, Sawadsky BV, Cook
DJ. Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocar-
dial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2000;283:2686—92.
27. Welsh RC, Goldstein P, Adgey J, et al. Variations in pre-
hospital fibrinolysis process of care: insights from the Assess-
ment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic 3 Plus
international acute myocardial infarction pre-hospital care
survey. Eur J Emerg Med 2004;11:134—40.
28. Weaver W, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom A, et al. Prehospital-
initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy: the
Myocardial Infacrtion Triage and Intervention Trial (MITI).
JAMA 1993;270:1203—10.
29. European Myocardial Infarction Project Group (EMIP). Pre-
hospital thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected
acute myocardial infarction. The European Myocardial
Infarction Project Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:383—9.
30. White HD. Debate: should the elderly receive thrombolytic
therapy, or primary angioplasty? Current Control Trials Car-
diovasc Med 2000;1:150—4.
31. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary
coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy
for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA
1997;278:2093—8.
32. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty ver-
sus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial
infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.
Lancet 2003;361:13—20.
33. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance
transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombol-
ysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the ran-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
domized national multicentre trial—PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J
2003;24:94—104.
34. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, et al. Impact of time to
treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or pri-
mary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical
trial. Circulation 2003;108:2851—6.
35. Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P, Montalescot G. Trans-
fer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis
in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation
2003;108:1809—14.
36. Scheller B, Hennen B, Hammer B, et al. Beneficial effects of
immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial
infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:634—41.
37. Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, et al. Rou-
tine invasive strategy within 24 h of thrombolysis versus
ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocar-
dial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a ran-
domised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1045—53.
38. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascular-
ization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by car-
diogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently
revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N
Engl J Med 1999;341:625—34.
39. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year sur-
vival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock.
JAMA 2001;285:190—2.
40. Antman EM, McCabe CH, Gurfinkel EP, et al. Enoxaparin
prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable
angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the
thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial. Cir-
culation 1999;100:1593—601.
41. Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP, et al. A comparison of low-
molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for
unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Sub-
cutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study
Group. N Engl J Med 1997;337:447—52.
42. Petersen JL, Mahaffey KW, Hasselblad V, et al. Efficacy
and bleeding complications among patients randomized to
enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin ther-
apy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes:
a systematic overview. JAMA 2004;292:89—96.
43. Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Antman EM, et al. Enoxaparin vs
unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-
segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with
an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the
SYNERGY randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292:45—54.
44. Van de Werf FJ, Armstrong PW, Granger C, Wallentin L. Effi-
cacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxa-
parin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-
3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet
2001;358:605—13.
45. Wallentin L, Goldstein P, Armstrong PW, et al. Efficacy
and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-
molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated hep-
arin in the prehospital setting: the Assessment of the Safety
and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3
PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction. Cir-
culation 2003;108:135—42.
46. Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, et al. Platelet gly-
coprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes:
a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials.
Lancet 2002;359:189—98 [erratum appears in Lancet 2002
Jun 15;359(9323):2120].
47. Simoons ML. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker
abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syn-
dromes without early coronary revascularisation: the GUSTO
IV-ACS randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1915—24.
S95
48. Topol EJ. Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarc-
tion with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibri-
nolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition:
the GUSTO V randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1905—14.
49. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D.
Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors
in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-
segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
JAMA 2004;292:362—6.
50. van’t Hof AW, Ernst N, de Boer MJ, et al. Facilitation of
primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycopro-
tein 2b/3a inhibitor: results of the ongoing tirofiban in
myocardial infarction evaluation (On-TIME) trial. Eur Heart
J 2004;25:837—46.
51. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in
patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steer-
ing Committee. Lancet 1996;348:1329—39.
52. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK.
Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with
acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N
Engl J Med 2001;345:494—502.
53. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment
with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy
in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:
the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001;358:527—33.
54. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann IIIrd JT, et al. Early and sus-
tained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous
coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
2002;288:2411—20.
55. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al. Addition of
clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocar-
dial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med
2005;352:1179—89.
56. The MIAMI Trial Research Group. Metoprolol in acute myocar-
dial infarction (MIAMI): a randomised placebo-controlled
international trial. Eur Heart J 1985;6:199—226.
57. Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027
cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. First
International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group.
Lancet 1986;2:57—66.
58. Halkin A, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Impact of intra-
venous beta-blockade before primary angioplasty on sur-
vival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion ther-
apy for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol
2004;43:1780—7.
59. Campbell RW, Murray A, Julian DG. Ventricular arrhythmias
in first 12 h of acute myocardial infarction: natural history
study. Br Heart J 1981;46:351—7.
60. O’Doherty M, Tayler DI, Quinn E, Vincent R, Chamberlain DA.
Five hundred patients with myocardial infarction monitored
within one hour of symptoms. BMJ 1983;286:1405—8.
61. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Furberg CD. Effects of prophylactic antiar-
rhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An
overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA
1993;270:1589—95.
62. Sadowski ZP, Alexander JH, Skrabucha B, et al. Multicen-
ter randomized trial and a systematic overview of lidocaine
in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1999;137:792—
8.
63. McAlister FA, Teo KK. Antiarrhythmic therapies for the
prevention of sudden cardiac death. Drugs 1997;54:235—
52.
64. ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral capto-
pril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate
in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarc-
tion. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival)
Collaborative Group. Lancet 1995;345:669—85.
S96
65. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Pfeffer M, et al. Effects of long-term treat-
ment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in the
presence or absence of aspirin: a systematic review. Lancet
2002;360:1037—43.
66. ACE Inhibitor MI Collaborative Group. Indications for
ACE inhibitors in the early treatment of acute myocar-
dial infarction: systematic overview of individual data
from 100,000 patients in randomized trials. ACE Inhibitor
Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group. Circulation
1998;97:2202—12.
H.-R. Arntz et al.
67. Swedberg K, Held P, Kjekshus J, Rasmussen K, Ryden L,
Wedel H. Effects of the early administration of enalapril
on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Sur-
vival Study II (CONSENSUS II). N Engl J Med 1992;327:678—
84.
68. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Laufs U, Snapinn S, Bohm M,
White HD. Withdrawal of statins increases event rates
in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation
2002;105:1446—52.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S97—S133
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 6. Paediatric life support
Dominique Biarent, Robert Bingham, Sam Richmond, Ian Maconochie,
Jonathan Wyllie, Sheila Simpson, Antonio Rodriguez Nunez,
David Zideman
Introduction
The process
The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) issued
guidelines for paediatric life support (PLS) in 1994,
1998 and 2000.1—4 The last edition was based on
the International Consensus on Science published
by the American Heart Association in collaboration
with the International Liaison Committee on Resus-
citation (ILCOR), undertaking a series of evidence-
based evaluations of the science of resuscitation
which culminated in the publication of the Guide-
lines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care in August 2000.5,6
This process was repeated in 2004/2005, and the
resulting Consensus on Science and Treatment Rec-
ommendations were published simultaneously in
Resuscitation, Circulation and Pediatrics in Novem-
ber 2005.7,8 The PLS Working Party of the ERC has
considered this document and the supporting sci-
entific literature, and has recommended changes
to the ERC PLS Guidelines. These are presented in
this paper.
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.010
Guidelines changes
The approach to changes has been to alter the
guidelines in response to convincing new scientific
evidence and, where possible, to simplify them in
order to assist teaching and retention. As before,
there remains a paucity of good-quality evidence on
paediatric resuscitation specifically and some con-
clusions have had to be drawn from animal work
and extrapolated adult data.
The current guidelines have a strong focus on
simplification based on the knowledge that many
children receive no resuscitation at all because res-
cuers fear doing harm. This fear is fuelled by the
knowledge that resuscitation guidelines for chil-
dren are different. Consequently, a major area of
study was the feasibility of applying the same guid-
ance for all adults and children. Bystander resusci-
tation improves outcome significantly,9,10 and there
is good evidence from paediatric animal models
that even doing chest compressions or expired air
ventilation alone may be better than doing noth-
ing at all.11 It follows that outcomes could be
improved if bystanders, who would otherwise do
nothing, were encouraged to begin resuscitation,
even if they do not follow an algorithm targeted
specifically at children. There are, however, dis-
S98
tinct differences between the predominantly adult
arrest of cardiac origin and asphyxial arrest, which
is most common in children,12 so a separate paedi-
atric algorithm is justified for those with a duty to
respond to paediatric emergencies (usually health-
care professionals), who are also in a position to
receive enhanced training.
Compression:ventilation ratios
The ILCOR treatment recommendation was that
the compression:ventilation ratio should be based
on whether one or more than one rescuers were
present. ILCOR recommends that lay rescuers,
who usually learn only single rescuer techniques,
should be taught to use a ratio of 30 compres-
sions to 2 ventilations, which is the same as the
adult guidelines and enables anyone trained in
BLS techniques to resuscitate children with mini-
mal additional information. Two or more rescuers
with a duty to respond should learn a different
ratio (15:2), as this has been validated by animal
and manikin studies.13—17 This latter group, who
would normally be healthcare professionals, should
receive enhanced training targeted specifically at
the resuscitation of children. Although there are
no data to support the superiority of any partic-
ular ratio in children, ratios of between 5:1 and
15:2 have been studied in manikins, and animal
and mathematical models, and there is increasing
evidence that the 5:1 ratio delivers an inadequate
number of compressions.14,18 There is certainly no
justification for having two separate ratios for chil-
dren aged greater or less than 8 years, so a single
ratio of 15:2 for multiple rescuers with a duty to
respond is a logical simplification.
It would certainly negate any benefit of simplic-
ity if lay rescuers were taught a different ratio for
use if there were two of them, but those with a duty
to respond can use the 30:2 ratio if they are alone,
particularly if they are not achieving an adequate
number of compressions because of difficulty in the
transition between ventilation and compression.
Age definitions
The adoption of single compression:ventilation
ratios for children of all ages, together with the
change in advice on the lower age limit for the
use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs),
renders the previous guideline division between
children above and below 8 years of age unneces-
sary. The differences between adult and paediatric
resuscitation are based largely on differing aeti-
ology, as primary cardiac arrest is more common
in adults whereas children usually suffer from sec-
D. Biarent et al.
ondary cardiac arrest. The onset of puberty, which
is the physiological end of childhood, is the most
logical landmark for the upper age limit for use
of paediatric guidance. This has the advantage of
being simple to determine, in contrast to an age
limit in years, as age may be unknown at the start of
resuscitation. Clearly, it is inappropriate and unnec-
essary to establish the onset of puberty formally; if
rescuers believe the victim to be a child they should
use the paediatric guidelines. If a misjudgement is
made and the victim turns out to be a young adult,
little harm will accrue, as studies of aetiology have
shown that the paediatric pattern of arrest contin-
ues into early adulthood.19 An infant is a child under
1 year of age; a child is between 1 year and puberty.
It is necessary to differentiate between infants and
older children, as there are some important differ-
ences between these two groups.
Chest compression technique
The modification to age definitions enables a sim-
plification of the advice on chest compression.
Advice for determining the landmarks for infant
compression is now the same as for older chil-
dren, as there is evidence that the previous rec-
ommendation could result in compression over the
upper abdomen.20 Infant compression technique
remains the same: two-finger compression for sin-
gle rescuers and two-thumb, encircling technique
for two or more rescuers,21—25 but for older children
there is no division between the one- or two-hand
technique.26 The emphasis is on achieving an ade-
quate depth of compression with minimal interrup-
tions, using one or two hands according to rescuer
preference.
Automated external defibrillators
Case reports published since International Guide-
lines 2000 have reported safe and successful use of
AEDs in children less than 8 years of age.27,28 Fur-
thermore, recent studies have shown that AEDs are
capable of identifying arrhythmias in children accu-
rately and that, in particular, they are extremely
unlikely to advise a shock inappropriately.29,30 Con-
sequently, advice on the use of AEDs has been
revised to include all children aged greater than 1
year.31 Nevertheless, if there is any possibility that
an AED may need to be used in children, the pur-
chaser should check that the performance of the
particular model has been tested against paediatric
arrhythmias.
Many manufacturers now supply purpose-made
paediatric pads or programmes, which typically
attenuate the output of the machine to 50—75 J.32
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S99

These devices are recommended for children aged

1—8 years.33,34 If no such system or manually
adjustable machine is available, an unmodified
adult AED may be used in children older than 1
year.35 There is currently insufficient evidence to
support a recommendation for or against the use of
AEDs in children aged less than 1 year.

Manual defibrillators

The 2005 Consensus Conference treatment rec-

ommendation for paediatric ventricular fibrillation
(VF) or paediatric pulseless ventricular tachycar-
dia (VT) is to defibrillate promptly. In adult ALS,
the recommendation is to give a single shock and
then resume CPR immediately without checking for
a pulse or reassessing the rhythm (see Section 3). As
a consequence of this single-shock strategy, when
using a monophasic defibrillator in adults a higher
initial energy dose than used previously is recom-
mended (360 J versus 200 J) (see Section 3). The
ideal energy dose for safe and effective defibril-
lation in children is unknown, but animal models
and small paediatric series show that doses larger
than 4 J kg−1 defibrillate effectively with negligible
side effects.27,34,36,37 Biphasic shocks are at least
as effective and produce less post-shock myocardial
dysfunction than monophasic shocks.33,34,37—40 For
simplicity of sequence and consistency with adult
BLS and ALS, we recommend a single-shock strategy
using a non-escalating dose of 4 J kg−1 (monophasic
or biphasic) for defibrillation in children.
Foreign-body airway obstruction sequence
The guidance for managing foreign-body airway
obstruction (FBAO) in children has been simpli-
fied and brought into closer alignment to the adult
sequence. These changes are discussed in detail at
the end of this section.
In the following text the masculine includes the
feminine and ‘child’ refers to both infants and chil-
dren unless noted otherwise.
6a Paediatric basic life support
Sequence of action
Rescuers who have been taught adult BLS and have
no specific knowledge of paediatric resuscitation
may use the adult sequence, with the exception
that they should perform 5 initial breaths followed
by approximately 1 min of CPR before they go for
help (Figure 6.1; also see adult BLS guideline).
Figure 6.1 Paediatric basic life support algorithm.
The following sequence is to be observed by
those with a duty to respond to paediatric emer-
gencies (usually health professionals).
1. Ensure the safety of rescuer and child.
2. Check the child’s responsiveness.
• Gently stimulate the child and ask loudly:
‘‘Are you all right?’’
• Do not shake infants or children with sus-
pected cervical spinal injuries.
3a If the child responds by answering or moving
• leave the child in the position in which you
find him (provided he is not in further danger)
• check his condition and get help if needed
• reassess him regularly
3b If the child does not respond
• shout for help;
• open the child’s airway by tilting the head and
lifting the chin, as follows:
o initially with the child in the position in
which you find him, place your hand on his
forehead and gently tilt his head back;
o at the same time, with your fingertip(s)
under the point of the child’s chin, lift the
chin. Do not push on the soft tissues under
the chin as this may block the airway;
o if you still have difficulty in opening the air-
way, try the jaw thrust method. Place the
first two fingers of each hand behind each
side of the child’s mandible and push the
jaw forward;
o both methods may be easier if the child is
turned carefully onto his back.
S100
If you suspect that there may have been an injury
to the neck, try to open the airway using chin lift or
jaw thrust alone. If this is unsuccessful, add head
tilt a small amount at a time until the airway is
open.
4. Keeping the airway open, look, listen and feel
for normal breathing by putting your face close
to the child’s face and looking along the chest.
• Look for chest movements.
• Listen at the child’s nose and mouth for breath
sounds.
• Feel for air movement on your cheek.
Look, listen and feel for no more than 10 s before
deciding.
5a If the child is breathing normally
• turn the child on his side into the recovery
position (see below)
• check for continued breathing
5b If the child is not breathing or is making agonal
gasps (infrequent, irregular breaths)
• carefully remove any obvious airway obstruc-
tion;
• give five initial rescue breaths;
• while performing the rescue breaths, note
any gag or cough response to your action.
These responses or their absence will form
part of your assessment of signs of a circu-
lation, which will be described later.
Rescue breaths for a child over 1 year are per-
formed as follows (Figure 6.2).
• Ensure head tilt and chin lift.
Figure 6.2 Mouth-to-mouth ventilation— child. © 2005
ERC.
D. Biarent et al.
• Pinch the soft part of the nose closed with the
index finger and thumb of your hand on his fore-
head.
• Open his mouth a little, but maintain the chin
upwards.
• Take a breath and place your lips around the
mouth, making sure that you have a good seal.
• Blow steadily into the mouth over about 1—1.5 s,
watching for chest rise.
• Maintain head tilt and chin lift, take your mouth
away from the victim and watch for his chest to
fall as air is expelled.
• Take another breath and repeat this sequence
five times. Identify effectiveness by seeing that
the child’s chest has risen and fallen in a similar
fashion to the movement produced by a normal
breath.
Rescue breaths for an infant are performed as
follows (Figure 6.3).
• Ensure a neutral position of the head and a chin
lift.
• Take a breath and cover the mouth and nasal
apertures of the infant with your mouth, making
sure you have a good seal. If the nose and mouth
cannot be covered in the older infant, the res-
cuer may attempt to seal only the infant’s nose
or mouth with his mouth (if the nose is used, close
the lips to prevent air escape).
• Blow steadily into the infant’s mouth and nose
over 1—1.5 s, sufficient to make the chest visibly
rise.
• Maintain head tilt and chin lift, take your mouth
away from the victim and watch for his chest to
fall as air is expelled.
• Take another breath and repeat this sequence
five times.
Figure 6.3 Mouth-to-mouth and nose ventilation—
infant. © 2005 ERC.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
If you have difficulty achieving an effective breath,
the airway may be obstructed.
• Open the child’s mouth and remove any visible
obstruction. Do not perform a blind finger sweep.
• Ensure that there is adequate head tilt and chin
lift but also that the neck is not over-extended.
• If head tilt and chin lift have not opened the air-
way, try the jaw thrust method.
• Make up to five attempts to achieve effective
breaths; if still unsuccessful, move on to chest
compressions.
6. Assess the child’s circulation. Take no more than
10 s to
• look for signs of a circulation. This includes
any movement, coughing or normal breathing
(not agonal gasps, which are infrequent, irreg-
ular breaths);
• check the pulse (if you are a health care
provider) but ensure you take no more than
10 s.
If the child is aged over 1 year, feel for the
carotid pulse in the neck.
In an infant, feel for the brachial pulse on the
inner aspect of the upper arm.
7a If you are confident that you can detect signs of
a circulation within 10 s
• continue rescue breathing, if necessary, until
the child starts breathing effectively on his
own
• turn the child onto his side (into the recovery
position) if he remains unconscious
• re-assess the child frequently
7b If there are no signs of a circulation, or no pulse
or a slow pulse (less than 60 min−1 with poor
perfusion), or you are not sure
• start chest compressions
• combine rescue breathing and chest compres-
sions
Chest compressions are performed as follows.
For all children, compress the lower third of the
sternum. To avoid compressing the upper abdomen,
locate the xiphisternum by finding the angle where
the lowest ribs join in the middle. Compress the
sternum one finger’s breadth above this; the com-
pression should be sufficient to depress the ster-
num by approximately one third of the depth of
the chest. Release the pressure and repeat at a
rate of about 100 min−1 . After 15 compressions,
tilt the head, lift the chin, and give two effective
breaths. Continue compressions and breaths in a
ratio of 15:2. Lone rescuers may use a ratio of 30:2,
particularly if having difficulty with the transition
between compression and ventilation. Although the
S101
Figure 6.4 Chest compression — infant. © 2005 ERC.
rate of compressions will be 100 min−1 , the actual
number delivered per minute will be less than 100
because of pauses to give breaths. The best method
for compression varies slightly between infants and
children.
To perform chest compression in infants, the lone
rescuer compresses the sternum with the tips of
two fingers (Figure 6.4). If there are two or more
rescuers, use the encircling technique. Place both
thumbs flat side by side on the lower third of the
sternum (as above) with the tips pointing towards
the infant’s head. Spread the rest of both hands
with the fingers together to encircle the lower part
of the infant’s rib cage with the tips of the fin-
gers supporting the infant’s back. Press down on the
lower sternum with the two thumbs to depress it
approximately one third of the depth of the infant’s
chest.
To perform chest compression in children over
1 year of age, place the heel of one hand
over the lower third of the sternum (as above)
(Figures 6.5 and 6.6). Lift the fingers to ensure that
pressure is not applied over the child’s ribs. Position
yourself vertically above the victim’s chest and,
with your arm straight, compress the sternum to
depress it by approximately one third of the depth
of the chest. In larger children or for small rescuers,
this is achieved most easily by using both hands with
the fingers interlocked.
8. Continue resuscitation until
• the child shows signs of life (spontaneous res-
piration, pulse, movement)
• qualified help arrives
• you become exhausted
When to call for assistance
It is vital for rescuers to get help as quickly as pos-
sible when a child collapses.
S102
• When more than one rescuer is available, one
starts resuscitation while another rescuer goes
for assistance.
• If only one rescuer is present, undertake resus-
citation for about 1 min before going for assis-
tance. To minimise interruption in CPR, it may
be possible to carry an infant or small child while
summoning help.
• The only exception to performing 1 min of CPR
before going for help is in the case of a child with
a witnessed, sudden collapse when the rescuer is
alone. In this case cardiac arrest is likely to be
arrhythmogenic in origin and the child will need
defibrillation. Seek help immediately if there is
no one to go for you.
Recovery position
An unconscious child whose airway is clear, and who
is breathing spontaneously, should be turned on his
side into the recovery position. There are several
Figure 6.5 Chest compression with one hand — child.
© 2005 ERC.
Figure 6.6 Chest compression with two hands — child.
© 2005 ERC.
D. Biarent et al.
recovery positions; each has its advocates. There
are important principles to be followed.
• Place the child in as near true lateral position
as possible, with his mouth dependent to enable
free drainage of fluid.
• The position should be stable. In an infant this
may require the support of a small pillow or
a rolled-up blanket placed behind the back to
maintain the position.
• Avoid any pressure on the chest that impairs
breathing.
• It should be possible to turn the child onto his side
and to return him back easily and safely, taking
into consideration the possibility of cervical spine
injury.
• Ensure the airway can be observed and accessed
easily.
• The adult recovery position is suitable for use in
children.
Foreign-body airway obstruction (FBAO)
No new evidence on this subject was presented dur-
ing the 2005 Consensus Conference. Back blows,
chest thrusts and abdominal thrusts all increase
intrathoracic pressure and can expel foreign bod-
ies from the airway. In half of the episodes,
more than one technique is needed to relieve the
obstruction.41 There are no data to indicate which
measure should be used first or in which order they
should be applied. If one is unsuccessful, try the
others in rotation until the object is cleared.
The International Guidelines 2000 algorithm is
difficult to teach and knowledge retention poor.
The FBAO algorithm for children has been simpli-
fied and aligned with the adult version (Figure 6.7).
This should improve skill retention and encourage
people, who might otherwise have been reluctant,
to perform FBAO manoeuvres on children.
Figure 6.7 Paediatric foreign body airway obstruction
algorithm.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
The most significant difference from the adult
algorithm is that abdominal thrusts should not be
used to treat choking infants. Although abdominal
thrusts have caused injuries in all age groups, the
risk is particularly high in infants and very young
children. This is because of the horizontal position
of the ribs, which leaves the upper abdominal vis-
cera much more exposed to trauma. For this reason,
the guidelines for the treatment of FBAO are differ-
ent between infants and children.
Recognition of FBAO
When a foreign body enters the airway, the child
reacts immediately by coughing in an attempt to
expel it. A spontaneous cough is likely to be more
effective and safer than any manoeuvre a rescuer
might perform. However, if coughing is absent or
ineffective and the object completely obstructs the
airway, the child will rapidly become asphyxiated.
Active interventions to relieve FBAO are therefore
required only when coughing becomes ineffective,
but they then need to be commenced rapidly and
confidently.
The majority of choking events in infants and
children occur during play or eating episodes when
a carer is usually present; thus, the events are fre-
quently witnessed and interventions are usually ini-
tiated when the child is conscious.
Foreign-body airway obstruction is characterized
by the sudden onset of respiratory distress associ-
ated with coughing, gagging or stridor. Similar signs
and symptoms may be associated with other causes
of airway obstruction, such as laryngitis or epiglot-
titis, which require different management. Suspect
FBAO if the onset was very sudden and there are no
other signs of illness and if there are clues to alert
the rescuer, e.g. a history of eating or playing with
small items immediately before the onset of symp-
toms.
Relief of FBAO
1. Safety and summoning assistance
Safety is paramount: rescuers must not place them-
selves in danger and should consider the safest
S103
treatment of the choking child.
• If the child is coughing effectively, no external
manoeuvre is necessary. Encourage the child to
cough, and monitor continually.
• If the child’s coughing is (or is becoming) ineffec-
tive, shout for help immediately and determine
the child’s conscious level.
2. Conscious child with FBAO
• If the child is still conscious but has absent or
ineffective coughing, give back blows.
• If back blows do not relieve the FBAO, give
chest thrusts to infants or abdominal thrusts to
children. These manoeuvres create an ‘artificial
cough’ to increase intrathoracic pressure and dis-
lodge the foreign body.
Back blows. Back blows in the infant are per-
formed as follows.
• Support the infant in a head downwards, prone
position, to enable gravity to assist removal of
the foreign body.
• A seated or kneeling rescuer should be able to
support the infant safely across their lap.
• Support the infant’s head by placing the thumb of
one hand at the angle of the lower jaw, and one
or two fingers from the same hand at the same
point on the other side of the jaw.
• Do not compress the soft tissues under the
infant’s jaw, as this will exacerbate the airway
obstruction.
• Deliver up to five sharp back blows with the heel
of one hand in the middle of the back between
the shoulder blades.
• The aim is to relieve the obstruction with each
blow rather than to give all five blows.
Back blows in the child over 1 year of age are
performed as follows.
• Back blows are more effective if the child is posi-
tioned head down.
• A small child may be placed across the rescuer’s
lap, as with the infant.
• If this is not possible, support the child in a
forward-leaning position and deliver the back
blows from behind.
If back blows fail to dislodge the object, and
the child is still conscious, use chest thrusts for
infants or abdominal thrusts for children. Do not
use abdominal thrusts (Heimlich manoeuvre) in
infants.
S104
Chest thrusts for infants.
• Turn the infant into a head-downwards supine
position. This is achieved safely by placing the
free arm along the infant’s back and encircling
the occiput with the hand.
• Support the infant down your arm, which is
placed down (or across) your thigh.
• Identify the landmark for chest compressions
(lower sternum approximately a finger’s breadth
above the xiphisternum).
• Give five chest thrusts; these are similar to chest
compressions but sharper and delivered at a
slower rate.
Abdominal thrusts for children over 1 year.
• Stand or kneel behind the child; place your arms
under the child’s arms and encircle his torso.
• Clench your fist and place it between the umbili-
cus and xiphisternum.
• Grasp this hand with the other hand and pull
sharply inwards and upwards.
• Repeat up to five times.
• Ensure that pressure is not applied to the xiphoid
process or the lower rib cage; this might cause
abdominal trauma.
Following the chest or abdominal thrusts,
reassess the child. If the object has not been
expelled and the victim is still conscious, continue
the sequence of back blows and chest (for infant) or
abdominal (for children) thrusts. Call out, or send,
for help if it is still not available. Do not leave the
child at this stage.
If the object is expelled successfully, assess
the child’s clinical condition. It is possible that
part of the object may remain in the respira-
tory tract and cause complications. If there is
any doubt, seek medical assistance. Abdominal
thrusts may cause internal injuries, and all vic-
tims so treated should be examined by a medical
practitioner.42
3. Unconscious child with FBAO
If the child with FBAO is, or becomes, uncon-
scious, place him on a firm, flat surface. Call
out, or send, for help if it is still not available.
Do not leave the child at this stage; proceed as
follows.
• Open the mouth and look for any obvious object.
If an object is seen, make an attempt to remove it
with a single finger sweep. Do not attempt blind
or repeated finger sweeps; these can impact the
D. Biarent et al.
object more deeply into the pharynx and cause
injury.
• Open the airway using a head tilt and/or chin
lift and attempt five rescue breaths. Assess the
effectiveness of each breath; if a breath does not
make the chest rise, reposition the head before
making the next attempt.
• Attempt five rescue breaths and, if there is
no response (moving, coughing, spontaneous
breaths), proceed to chest compressions without
further assessment of the circulation.
• Follow the sequence for single-rescuer CPR (step
7b above) for approximately 1 min before sum-
moning the EMS (if this has not already been done
by someone else).
• When the airway is opened for attempted deliv-
ery of rescue breaths, look to see if the foreign
body can be seen in the mouth.
• If an object is seen, attempt to remove it with a
single finger sweep.
• If it appears the obstruction has been relieved,
open and check the airway as above; deliver res-
cue breaths if the child is not breathing.
• If the child regains consciousness and exhibits
spontaneous effective breathing, place him in a
safe position lying on his side and monitor breath-
ing and conscious level while awaiting the arrival
of the EMS.
6b Paediatric advanced life support
Prevention of cardiopulmonary arrest
In children, secondary cardiopulmonary arrests,
caused by either circulatory or respiratory fail-
ure, are more frequent than primary arrests
caused by arrhythmias.9,12,43—46 So-called ‘asphyx-
ial arrests’ or respiratory arrests are also more
common in young adulthood (e.g., trauma, drown-
ing, poisoning).47,48 The outcome from cardiopul-
monary arrests in children is poor; identification of
the antecedent stages of cardiac or respiratory fail-
ure is a priority, as effective early intervention may
be life saving.
The order of assessment and intervention for any
seriously ill or injured child follows the ABC princi-
ples.
• A indicates airway (Ac for airway and cervical
spine stabilisation for the injured child).
• B indicates breathing.
• C indicates circulation.
Interventions are made at each step of the
assessment as abnormalities are identified; the next
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
step of the assessment is not started until the
preceding abnormality has been managed and cor-
rected if possible.
Diagnosing respiratory failure: assessment
of A and B
The first steps in the assessment of the seriously ill
or injured child are the management of the airway
and breathing. Abnormalities in airway patency and
breathing lead to respiratory failure. Signs of res-
piratory failure are
• respiratory rate outside the normal range for the
child’s age—–either too fast or too slow
• initially increasing work of breathing which
may progress to inadequate/decreased work
of breathing, additional noises such as stridor,
wheeze or grunting, or the loss of breath sounds
• cyanosis (without/with supplemental oxygen)
There may be associated signs in other organ sys-
tems affected by inadequate ventilation and oxy-
genation; these are detectable in the C steps of
assessment, such as
• increasing tachycardia progressing to bradycar-
dia (this latter sign being an ominous indicator of
the loss of compensatory mechanisms)
• alteration in the level of consciousness
Diagnosing circulatory failure: assessment
of C
Shock is characterised by a mismatch between
metabolic tissue demand and delivery of oxy-
gen and nutrients by the circulation.49 Physiolog-
ical compensatory mechanisms lead to changes
in the heart rate, in the systemic vascular resis-
tance (which commonly increases as an adaptive
response) and in tissue and organ perfusion. Signs
of circulatory failure are
• increased heart rate (bradycardia is an ominous
sign, heralding physiological decompensation)
• decreased systemic blood pressure
• decreased peripheral perfusion (prolonged capil-
lary refill time, decreased skin temperature, pale
or mottled skin)
• weak or absent peripheral pulses
• decreased or increased preload
• decreased urine output and metabolic acidosis
Other systems may be affected, for example
• respiratory rate may be increased initially, be-
coming bradypnoeic with decompensated shock
S105
• level of consciousness may decrease because of
poor cerebral perfusion
Diagnosing cardiopulmonary arrest
Signs of cardiopulmonary arrest include
• unresponsiveness
• apnoea or gasping respiratory pattern
• absent circulation
• pallor or deep cyanosis
In the absence of ‘signs of life’, search for a
central pulse or cardiac sounds (by direct chest aus-
cultation) for a maximum of 10 s, before starting
CPR. If there is any doubt, start CPR.50—53
Management of respiratory and
circulatory failure
A and B
Open the airway and ensure adequate ventilation
and oxygenation.
• Deliver high-flow oxygen.
• Achieving adequate ventilation and oxygenation
may include the use of airway adjuncts, bag-mask
ventilation (BMV), use of a laryngeal mask airway
(LMA), securing a definitive airway by tracheal
intubation and positive pressure ventilation.
• In rare, extreme circumstances, a surgical airway
may be required.
C
Establish cardiac monitoring.
• Secure vascular access to the circulation. This
may be via peripheral or central intravenous (IV)
or by intraosseous (IO) cannulation.
• Give a fluid bolus and/or inotropes as required.
Assess and re-assess the child continuously, each
time commencing at Airway before Breathing,
thereafter moving onto the Circulation
Airway
Open the airway using basic life support tech-
niques. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways
adjuncts can help maintain the airway. Use the
oropharyngeal airway only in the unconscious child,
in whom there is no gag reflex. Use the appro-
priate size, to avoid pushing the tongue back-
ward and obstructing the epiglottis, or directly
compressing the glottic area. The soft palate in
S106
the child can be damaged by insertion of the
oropharygneal airway; avoid this by inserting the
oropharygneal airway under direct vision and pass-
ing it over a tongue depressor or laryngoscope.
The nasopharyngeal airway is tolerated better in
the conscious child (who has an effective gag
reflex), but should not be used if there is a basal
skull fracture or a coagulopathy. These simple
airway adjuncts do not protect the airway from
aspiration of secretions, blood or stomach con-
tents.
Laryngeal mask airway
The LMA is an acceptable initial airway device for
providers experienced in its use. It may be particu-
larly helpful in airway obstruction caused by upper
airway abnormalities. The LMA does not, however,
protect the airway from aspiration of secretions,
blood or stomach contents, and therefore close
observation is required. LMA use is associated with
a higher incidence of complications in small chil-
dren compared with adults.54
Tracheal intubation
Tracheal intubation is the most secure and effective
way to establish and maintain the airway, prevent
gastric distension, protect the lungs against pul-
monary aspiration, enable optimal control of the
airway pressure and provide positive end expiratory
pressure (PEEP). The oral route is preferable during
resuscitation. Oral intubation is usually quicker and
is associated with fewer complications than nasal
placement. The judicious use of anaesthetics, seda-
tives and neuromuscular blocking drugs is indicated
in the conscious child to avoid multiple intubation
attempts or intubation failure.55—65 The anatomy
of a child’s airway differs significantly from that of
an adult; hence, intubation of a child requires spe-
cial training and experience. Check that tracheal
tube placement is correct by clinical examination
and end-tidal capnography. The tracheal tube must
be secured, and monitoring of the vital signs is
essential.66
It is also essential to plan an alternative airway
management technique in case the trachea cannot
be intubated.
Rapid sequence induction and intubation. The
child who is in cardiopulmonary arrest and deep
coma does not require sedation or analgesia to be
intubated; otherwise, intubation must be preceded
by oxygenation, rapid sedation, analgesia and the
use of neuromuscular blocking drugs to minimise
intubation complications and failure.63 The intuba-
D. Biarent et al.
tor must be experienced and familiar with rapid-
sequence induction drugs.
Tracheal tube sizes. The tracheal tube internal
diameters (ID) for different ages are
• for neonates, 2.5—3.5 mm according to the for-
mula (gestational age in weeks 10)
• for infants, 4 or 4.5 mm
• for children older than 1 year, according to the
formula [(age in years/4) + 4]
Tracheal tube size estimation according the
length of the child’s body as measured by resusci-
tation tapes is more accurate than using the above
formulae.67
Cuffed versus uncuffed tracheal tubes. In the pre-
hospital setting, an uncuffed tracheal tube may be
preferable when using sizes of up to 5.5 mm ID (i.e.,
for children up to 8 years). In hospital, a cuffed tra-
cheal tube may be useful in certain circumstances,
e.g. in cases of poor lung compliance, high air-
way resistance or large glottic air leak.68—70 The
correctly sized cuffed tracheal tube is as safe as
an uncuffed tube for infants and children (not for
neonates), provided attention is paid to its place-
ment, size and cuff inflation pressure; excessive
cuff pressure can lead to ischaemic necrosis of
the surrounding laryngeal tissue and stenosis. Main-
tain the cuff inflation pressure below 20 cmH2 O and
check it regularly.71
Confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement.
Displaced, misplaced or obstructed tubes occur
frequently in the intubated child and are asso-
ciated with increased risk of death.72,73 No sin-
gle technique is 100% reliable for distinguishing
oesophageal from tracheal intubation.74—76 Assess-
ment of the correct tracheal tube position is made
by
• observation of the tube passing beyond the vocal
cords
• observation of symmetrical chest wall movement
during positive pressure ventilation
• observation of mist in the tube during the expi-
ratory phase of ventilation
• absence of gastric distension
• equal air entry heard on bilateral auscultation of
both axillae and apices of the chest
• absence of air entry into the stomach on auscul-
tation
• detection of end-tidal CO2 if the child has a per-
fusing rhythm (this may be seen with effective
CPR)
• improvement or stabilisation of SpO2 to the
expected range
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
• improvement of heart rate towards the age-
expected value (or remaining within the normal
range)
If the child is in cardiopulmonary arrest and
exhaled CO2 is not detected, or if there is any
doubt, confirm tracheal tube position by direct
laryngoscopy. After correct placement and confir-
mation, secure the tracheal tube and reassess its
position. Maintain the child’s head in neutral posi-
tion; flexion of the head drives the tube further into
the trachea whereas extension may pull it out of the
airway.77 Confirm the position of the tracheal tube
at mid trachea by plain chest radiograph; the tra-
cheal tube tip should be at the level of the 2nd or
3rd thoracic vertebra.
DOPES is a useful acronym for the causes of sud-
den deterioration in an intubated child
• D: displacement of the tracheal tube
• O: obstruction of the tracheal tube
• P: pneumothorax
• E: equipment failure (source of gas, BMV, venti-
lator, etc.)
• S: stomach (gastric distension may alter dia-
phragm mechanics)
Breathing
Oxygenation
Use oxygen at the highest concentration (i.e., 100%)
during resuscitation. Once circulation is restored,
give sufficient oxygen to maintain peripheral oxy-
gen saturation at or above 95%.78,79
Studies in neonates suggest some advantages to
using room air during resuscitation, but the evi-
dence as yet is inconclusive (see Section 6c).80—83
In the older child, there is no evidence for any such
advantages, so use 100% oxygen for resuscitation.
Ventilation
Healthcare providers commonly provide excessive
ventilation to victims of cardiopulmonary or res-
piratory arrest, and this may be detrimental.
Hyperventilation causes increased thoracic pres-
sure, decreased cerebral and coronary perfusion,
and poorer survival rates in animals and adults.84—89
The ideal tidal volume should achieve modest chest
wall rise. Use a ratio of 15 chest compressions to 2
ventilations (a lone rescuer may use 30:2); the cor-
rect compression rate is 100 min−1 .
Once the airway is protected by tracheal intu-
bation, continue positive pressure ventilation at
12—20 breaths min−1 without interrupting chest
compressions. Take care to ensure that lung infla-
S107
tion is adequate during chest compressions. When
circulation is restored, or if the child still has a per-
fusing rhythm, ventilate at 12—20 breaths min−1 to
achieve a normal pCO2 . Hyperventilation is harm-
ful.
Bag-mask ventilation. BMV is effective and safe
for a child requiring assisted ventilation for a short
period, i.e. in the prehospital setting or in an emer-
gency department.73,90—92 Assess the effectiveness
of BMV by observing adequate chest rise, monitor-
ing heart rate, auscultating for breath sounds and
measuring peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2 ). Any
healthcare provider dealing with children must be
able to deliver BMV effectively.
Prolonged ventilation. If prolonged ventilation is
required, the benefits of a secured airway prob-
ably outweigh the potential risks associated with
tracheal intubation.
Monitoring of breathing and ventilation
End tidal CO2 . Monitoring end-tidal CO2 with a
colorimetric detector or capnometer confirms tra-
cheal tube placement in the child weighing more
than 2 kg, and may be used in pre- and in-hospital
settings, as well as during any transportation of the
child.93—97 A colour change or the presence of a
capnographic waveform indicates that the tube is
in the tracheobronchial tree, both in the presence
of a perfusing rhythm and during cardiopulmonary
arrest. Capnography does not rule out intubation
of the right mainstem bronchus. The absence of
exhaled CO2 during cardiopulmonary arrest may not
be caused by tube misplacement, since a low or
absent end-tidal CO2 may reflect low or absent pul-
monary blood flow.98—101
Oesophageal detector devices. The self-inflating
bulb or aspirating syringe (oesophageal detector
device, ODD) may be used for the secondary confir-
mation of tracheal tube placement in children with
a perfusing rhythm.102,103 There are no studies on
the use of ODD in children who are in cardiopul-
monary arrest.
Pulse oximetry. Clinical evaluation of the oxygen
level is unreliable; therefore monitor the child’s
peripheral oxygen saturation continuously by pulse
oximetry. Pulse oximetry can be unreliable under
certain conditions, e.g. if the child is in shock, in
cardiopulmonary arrest or has poor peripheral per-
fusion. Although pulse oximetry is relatively simple,
it is a poor guide to tracheal tube displacement;
capnography detects tracheal tube dislodgement
more rapidly than pulse oximetry.104
S108
Circulation
Vascular access
Vascular access is essential to give drugs and fluids
and obtain blood samples. Venous access can be dif-
ficult to establish during resuscitation of an infant
or child.105 Limit the maximum number of attempts
to obtain IV access to three; thereafter, insert an IO
needle.106
Intraosseous access. IO access is a rapid, safe,
and effective route to give drugs, fluids and blood
products.107—113 The onset of action and time
to achieve adequate plasma drug concentrations
are similar to those provided by central venous
access.114,115 Bone marrow samples can be used to
cross-match for blood type or group,116 for chem-
ical analysis,117,118 and for blood gas measure-
ment (the values are comparable to central venous
blood gases).117,119,120 Flush each drug with a bolus
of normal saline to ensure dispersal beyond the
marrow cavity and to achieve faster distribution
to the central circulation. Inject large boluses of
fluid using manual pressure. Intraosseous access can
be maintained until definitive IV access has been
established.
Intravenous access. Peripheral IV access pro-
vides plasma concentrations of drugs and clinical
responses equivalent to central or IO access.121—125
Central lines provide more secure long-term
access121,122,124,125 but offer no advantages during
resuscitation, compared with IO or peripheral IV
access.
Tracheal tube access
IV and IO access are better than the tracheal route
for giving drugs.126 Lipid-soluble drugs, such as
lidocaine, atropine, adrenaline and naloxone are
absorbed via the lower airway.127—131 Optimal tra-
cheal tube drug doses are unknown because of the
great variability of alveolar drug absorption, but
the following dosages have been recommended as
guidance
• adrenaline, 100 mcg kg−1
• lidocaine, 2—3 mg kg−1
• atropine, 30 mcg kg−1
The optimal dose of naloxone is not known.
Dilute the drug in 5 ml of normal saline and fol-
low administration with five ventilations.132—134 Do
not give non-lipid soluble medications (e.g., glu-
cose, bicarbonate, calcium) via the tracheal tube
because they will damage the airway mucosa.
D. Biarent et al.
Fluids and drugs
Volume expansion is indicated when a child shows
signs of shock in the absence of volume overload.135
If systemic perfusion is inadequate, give a bolus
of 20 ml kg−1 of an isotonic crystalloid, even if the
systemic blood pressure is normal. Following every
bolus, re-assess the child’s clinical state using ABC,
to decide whether a further bolus or other treat-
ment is required.
There are insufficient data to make recommen-
dations about the use of hypertonic saline for shock
associated with head injuries or hypovolaemia.136
There are also insufficient data to recommend
delayed fluid resuscitation in the hypotensive child
with blunt trauma.137 Avoid dextrose-containing
solutions unless there is hypoglycaemia.138—141
However, hypoglycaemia must actively be sought
and avoided, particularly in the small child or
infant.
Adenosine
Adenosine is an endogenous nucleotide which
causes a brief atrioventricular (AV) block and
impairs accessory bundle re-entry at the level of the
AV node. Adenosine is recommended for the treat-
ment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT).142 It is
safe to use, as it has a short half-life (10 s); give
it intravenously via upper limb or central veins, to
minimise the time taken to reach the heart. Give
adenosine rapidly, followed by a flush of 3—5 ml of
normal saline.143
Adrenaline (epinephrine)
Adrenaline is an endogenous catecholamine with
potent alpha, beta-1 and beta-1 adrenergic actions.
It is the essential medication in cardiopulmonary
arrest, and is placed prominently in the treat-
ment algorithms for non-shockable and shock-
able rhythms. Adrenaline induces vasoconstriction,
increases diastolic pressure and thereby improves
coronary artery perfusion pressure, enhances
myocardial contractility, stimulates spontaneous
contractions and increases the amplitude and fre-
quency of VF, so increasing the likelihood of suc-
cessful defibrillation. The recommended IV/IO dose
of adrenaline in children is 10 mcg kg−1 . The dose of
adrenaline given via the tracheal tube is ten times
this (100 mcg kg−1 ).127,144—146 If needed, give fur-
ther doses of adrenaline every 3—5 min. The use of
higher doses of adrenaline via the IV or IO route is
not recommended routinely, as it does not improve
survival or neurological outcome after cardiopul-
monary arrest.147—150
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Once spontaneous circulation is restored, a con-
tinuous infusion of adrenaline may be required. Its
haemodynamic effects are dose related; there is
also considerable variability between children in
response, therefore, titrate the infusion dose to
the desired effect. High infusion rates may cause
excessive vasoconstriction, compromising extrem-
ity, mesenteric, and renal blood flow. High-dose
adrenaline may cause severe hypertension and
tachyarrhythmias.151
To avoid tissue damage it is essential to give
adrenaline through a secure intravascular line (IV or
IO). Adrenaline and other catecholamines are inac-
tivated by alkaline solutions and should never be
mixed with sodium bicarbonate.152
Amiodarone
Amiodarone is a non-competitive inhibitor of adren-
ergic receptors; it depresses conduction in myocar-
dial tissue and therefore slows AV conduction and
prolongs the QT interval and the refractory period.
Except when given for the treatment of refrac-
tory VF/pulseless VT, amiodarone must be injected
slowly (over 10—20 min) with systemic blood pres-
sure and ECG monitoring to avoid fast-infusion-
related hypotension. This side effect is less common
with the aqueous solution.153 Other rare but signif-
icant adverse effects are bradycardia and polymor-
phic VT.154
Atropine
Atropine accelerates sinus and atrial pacemakers
by blocking the parasympathetic response. It may
also increase AV conduction. Small doses (<100 mcg)
may cause paradoxical bradycardia.155
Calcium
Calcium is essential for myocardial con-
traction156,157 but routine use of calcium does
not improve the outcome from cardiopulmonary
arrest.158—160
Glucose
Neonatal, child and adult data show that both
hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia are associ-
ated with poor outcome after cardiopulmonary
arrest,161—163 but it is uncertain if this is causative
or merely an association.164 Check blood or plasma
glucose concentration and monitor closely in any ill
or injured child, including after cardiac arrest. Do
not give glucose-containing fluids during CPR unless
hypoglycaemia is present. Avoid hyperglycaemia
S109
and hypoglycaemia following return of spontaneous
circulation (ROSC).
Magnesium
There is no evidence for giving magnesium rou-
tinely during cardiopulmonary arrest.165 Magne-
sium treatment is indicated in the child with doc-
umented hypomagnesaemia or with torsades de
pointes VF, regardless of the cause.166
Sodium bicarbonate
Giving sodium bicarbonate routinely during car-
diopulmonary arrest and CPR or after ROSC is
not recommended.167,168 After effective ventila-
tion and chest compressions have been achieved
and adrenaline given, sodium bicarbonate may be
considered for the child who has had a prolonged
cardiopulmonary arrest and severe metabolic aci-
dosis. Sodium bicarbonate may also be consid-
ered in the case of haemodynamic instability
and co-existing hyperkalaemia, or in the man-
agement of tricyclic overdose. Excessive quan-
tities of sodium bicarbonate may impair tissue
oxygen delivery, produce hypokalaemia, hyper-
natraemia and hyperosmolality and inactivate
catecholamines.
Lidocaine
Lidocaine is less effective than amiodarone for
defibrillation-resistant VF/VT in adults,169 and
therefore is not the first-line treatment in
defibrillation-resistant VF/VT in children.
Procainamide
Procainamide slows intra-atrial conduction and pro-
longs the QRS and QT intervals; it can be used in
SVT170,171 or VT172 resistant to other medications,
in the haemodynamically stable child. However,
paediatric data are sparse and procainamide should
be used cautiously.173,174 Procainamide is a potent
vasodilator and can cause hypotension; infuse it
slowly with careful monitoring.170,175,176
Vasopressin
Vasopressin is an endogenous hormone that acts
at specific receptors, mediating systemic vasocon-
striction (via V1 receptor) and the reabsorption of
water in the renal tubule (by the V2 receptor).177
The use of vasopressin for the treatment of cardiac
arrest in adults is discussed in detail in Section 4e.
There is currently insufficient evidence to support
S110
or refute the use of vasopressin as an alternative to,
or in combination with, adrenaline in any cardiac
arrest rhythm in adults. Thus, there is currently
insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use
of vasopressin in the child with cardiopulmonary
arrest.178—180
Defibrillators
Defibrillators are either automatically (such as the
AED) or manually operated, and may be capable
of delivering either monophasic or biphasic shocks.
Manual defibrillators capable of delivering the full
energy requirements from neonates upwards must
be available within hospitals and in other health-
care facilities caring for children at risk of car-
diopulmonary arrest. Automated external defibril-
lators are preset for all variables, including the
energy dose.
Pad/paddle size for defibrillation. The largest
possible available paddles should be chosen to pro-
vide good contact with the chest wall. The ideal
size is unknown, but there should be good separa-
tion between the pads.181,182 Recommended sizes
are
• 4.5 cm diameter for infants and children weighing
<10 kg
• 8—12 cm diameter for children >10 kg (older than
1 year)
To decrease skin and thoracic impedance,
an electrically conducting interface is required
between the skin and the paddles. Preformed gel
pads or self-adhesive defibrillation electrodes are
effective. Do not use ultrasound gel, saline-soaked
gauze, alcohol-soaked gauze/pads or ultrasound
gel.
Position of the paddles. Apply the paddles firmly
to the bare chest in the anterolateral position, one
paddle placed below the right clavicle and the other
in the left axilla (Figure 6.8). If the paddles are too
large, and there is a danger of charge arcing across
the paddles, one should be placed on the upper
back, below the left scapula, and the other on the
front, to the left of the sternum. This is known as
the anteroposterior position.
Optimal paddle force. To decrease transthoracic
impedance during defibrillation, apply a force of
3 kg for children weighing <10 kg, and 5 kg for larger
children.183,184
Energy dose in children. The ideal energy dose
for safe and effective defibrillation is unknown.
D. Biarent et al.
Figure 6.8 Paddle positions for defibrillation — child.
© 2005 ERC.
Biphasic shocks are at least as effective and pro-
duce less post-shock myocardial dysfunction than
monophasic shocks.33,34,37—40 Animal models show
better results with paediatric doses of 3—4 J kg−1
than with lower doses,34,37 or adult doses.35 Doses
larger than 4 J kg−1 (as much as 9 J kg−1 ) have defib-
rillated children effectively with negligible side
effects.27,36 When using a manual defibrillator, use
4 J kg−1 (biphasic or monophasic waveform) for the
first and subsequent shocks.
If no manual defibrillator is available, use
an AED that can recognise paediatric shockable
rhythms.29,30,185 This AED should be equipped with
a dose attenuator which decreases the delivered
energy to a lower dose more suitable for children
aged 1—8 years (50—75 J).31 If such an AED in not
available, in an emergency use a standard AED and
the preset adult energy levels. For children weigh-
ing more than 25 kg (above 8 years), use a standard
AED with standard paddles. There is currently insuf-
ficient evidence to support a recommendation for
or against the use of AEDs in children less than 1
year.
Management of cardiopulmonary arrest
ABC
Commence and continue with basic life support
(Figure 6.9).
A and B
Oxygenate and ventilate with BMV.
• Provide positive pressure ventilation with a high
inspired oxygen concentration.
• Give five rescue breaths followed by external
chest compression and positive pressure ventila-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S111

Figure 6.9 Paediatric advanced life support algorithm.

tion in the ratio of 15:2 (lone rescuer may use
30:2).
• Avoid rescuer fatigue by changing the rescuer
performing chest compressions frequently.
• Establish cardiac monitoring.
• If no vascular access is available and a tracheal
tube is in situ, give adrenaline, 100 mcg kg−1 , via
this route until IV/IO access is obtained.
• Identify and treat any reversible causes (4Hs &
4Ts).

C
Assess cardiac rhythm and signs of circulation
(±check for a central pulse for no more than 10 s).
Asystole, pulseless electrical activity
(PEA)—–non-shockable
• Give adrenaline, 10 mcg kg−1 IV or IO, and repeat
every 3—5 min.
VF/pulseless VT—–shockable
• Attempt defibrillation immediately (4 J kg−1 for
all shocks).
• Resume CPR as soon as possible.
• After 2 min, check the cardiac rhythm on the
monitor.
• Give second shock if still in VF/pulseless
VT.
S112
• Immediately resume CPR for 2 min and check
monitor; if no change, give adrenaline followed
immediately by a 3rd shock.
• CPR for 2 min.
• Give amiodarone if still in VF/pulseless VT fol-
lowed immediately by a 4th shock.
• Give adrenaline every 3—5 min during CPR.
• If the child remains in VF/pulseless VT, continue
to alternate shocks with 2 min of CPR.
• If signs of life become evident, check the monitor
for an organised rhythm; if this is present, check
for a central pulse.
• Identify and treat any reversible causes (4Hs &
4Ts).
• If defibrillation was successful but VF/pulseless
VT recurs, resume CPR, give amiodarone and
defibrillate again at the dose that was effective
previously. Start a continuous infusion of amio-
darone.
Reversible causes of cardiac arrest (4 Hs
and 4 Ts)
• Hypoxia
• Hypovolaemia
• Hyper/hypokalaemia
• Hypothermia
• Tension pneumothorax
• Tamponade (coronary or pulmonary)
• Toxic/therapeutic disturbances
• Thrombosis (coronary or pulmonary)
Sequence of events in cardiopulmonary
arrest
• When a child becomes unresponsive, with-
out signs of life (no breathing, cough or any
detectable movement), start CPR immediately.
• Provide BMV with 100% oxygen.
• Commence monitoring. Send for a manual or
automatic external defibrillator (AED) to identify
and treat shockable rhythms as quickly as possi-
ble.
In the less common circumstance of a witnessed
sudden collapse, early activation of emergency ser-
vices and getting an AED may be more appropriate;
start CPR as soon as possible.
Rescuers must perform CPR with minimal inter-
ruption until attempted defibrillation.
Cardiac monitoring
Position the cardiac monitor leads or defibrillation
paddles as soon as possible, to enable differentia-
D. Biarent et al.
tion between a shockable and a non-shockable car-
diac rhythm. Invasive monitoring of systemic blood
pressure may help to improve effectiveness of chest
compression,186 but must not delay the provision of
basic or advanced resuscitation.
Shockable rhythms comprise pulseless VT and
VF. These rhythms are more likely in the child
who presents with sudden collapse. Non-shockable
rhythms comprise PEA, bradycardia (<60 beats
min−1 with no signs of circulation) and asystole. PEA
and bradycardia often have wide QRS complexes.
Non-shockable rhythms
Most cardiopulmonary arrests in children and ado-
lescents are of respiratory origin.19,44,187—189 A
period of immediate CPR is therefore mandatory
in this age group, before searching for an AED
or manual defibrillator, as their immediate avail-
ability will not improve the outcome of a res-
piratory arrest.11,13 Bystander CPR is associated
with a better neurological outcome in adults and
children.9,10,190 The most common ECG patterns in
infants, children and adolescents with cardiopul-
monary arrest are asystole and PEA. PEA is charac-
terised by organised, wide complex electrical activ-
ity, usually at a slow rate, and absent pulses. PEA
commonly follows a period of hypoxia or myocardial
ischaemia, but occasionally can have a reversible
cause (i.e., one of the 4 H’s and 4 T’S) that led to
a sudden impairment of cardiac output.
Shockable rhythms
VF occurs in 3.8—19% of cardiopulmonary arrests
in children9,45,188,189 ; the incidence of VF/pulseless
VT increases with age.185,191 The primary deter-
minant of survival from VF/pulseless VT cardiopul-
monary arrest is the time to defibrillation. Prehospi-
tal defibrillation within the first 3 min of witnessed
adult VF arrest results in >50% survival. However,
the success of defibrillation decreases dramatically
as the time to defibrillation increases; for every
minute delay in defibrillation (without any CPR),
survival decreases by 7—10%. Survival after more
than 12 min of VF in adult victims is <5%.192 Car-
diopulmonary resuscitation provided before defib-
rillation for response intervals longer than 5 min
improved outcome in some studies,193,194 but not
in others.195
Drugs in shockable rhythms
Adrenaline is given every 3—5 min by the IV or IO
route in preference to the tracheal tube route.
Amiodarone is indicated in defibrillation-resistant
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
VF/pulseless VT. Experimental and clinical experi-
ence with amiodarone in children is scarce; evi-
dence from adult studies169,196,197 demonstrates
increased survival to hospital admission, but not
to hospital discharge. One paediatric case series
demonstrates the effectiveness of amiodarone for
life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.198 There-
fore, IV amiodarone has a role in the treatment of
defibrillation refractory or recurrent VF/pulseless
VT in children.
Arrhythmias
Unstable arrhythmias
Check the central pulse of any child with an
arrhythmia; if the pulse is absent, proceed to
treating the child as being in cardiopulmonary
arrest. If the child has a central pulse, evaluate
his haemodynamic status. Whenever the haemody-
namic status is compromised, the first steps are as
follows.
• Open the airway.
• Assist ventilation and give oxygen.
• Attach ECG monitor or defibrillator and assess the
cardiac rhythm.
• Evaluate if the rhythm is slow or fast for the
child’s age.
• Evaluate if the rhythm is regular or irregular.
• Measure QRS complex (narrow complexes, <0.08 s
duration; large complexes, >0.08 s).
• The treatment options are dependent on the
child’s haemodynamic stability.
Bradycardia
Bradycardia is caused commonly by hypoxia, acido-
sis and severe hypotension; it may progress to car-
diopulmonary arrest. Give 100% oxygen, and posi-
tive pressure ventilation if required, to any child
presenting with bradyarrhythmia and circulatory
failure.
If a poorly perfused child has a heart rate <60
beats min−1 , and does not respond rapidly to ven-
tilation with oxygen, start chest compressions and
give adrenaline. If the bradycardia is caused by
vagal stimulation, provide ventilation with 100%
oxygen and give atropine, before giving adrenaline.
A cardiac pacemaker is useful only in cases of
AV block or sinus node dysfunction unresponsive to
oxygenation, ventilation, chest compressions and
other medications; the pacemaker is not effective
in asystole or arrhythmias caused by hypoxia or
ischaemia.199
S113
Tachycardia
Narrow complex tachycardia. If supraventricu-
lar tachycardia (SVT) is the likely rhythm, vagal
manoeuvres (Valsalva or diving reflex) may be used
in haemodynamically stable children. The manoeu-
vres can be used in unstable children if they do
not delay chemical or electrical cardioversion.200 If
the child is haemodynamically unstable, omit vagal
manoeuvres and attempt electrical cardioversion
immediately. Adenosine is usually effective in con-
verting SVT into sinus rhythm. Adenosine is given
by rapid IV injection as closely as practical to the
heart (see above), followed immediately by a bolus
of normal saline.
Electrical cardioversion (synchronised with R
wave) is indicated in the haemodynamically com-
promised child, in whom vascular access is not
available, or in whom adenosine has failed to con-
vert the rhythm. The first energy dose for electrical
cardioversion of SVT is 0.5—1 J kg−1 and the second
dose is 2 J kg−1 . If unsuccessful, give amiodarone
or procainamide under guidance from a paediatric
cardiologist or intensivist before the third attempt.
Amiodarone has been shown to be effective
in the treatment of SVT in several paediatric
studies.198,201—207 However, since most studies of
the use of amiodarone in narrow-complex tachy-
cardias have been for junctional ectopic tachycar-
dia in postoperative children, the applicability of
its use in all cases of SVT may be limited. If the
child is haemodynamically stable, early consulta-
tion with an expert is recommended before giving
amiodarone.
Wide complex tachycardia. In children, wide-
QRS-complex tachycardia is more likely to be
supraventricular than ventricular in origin.208
However, wide-QRS-complex tachycardia, although
uncommon, must be considered to be VT in haemo-
dynamically unstable children until proven other-
wise. VT occurs most often in the child with under-
lying heart disease (e.g., after cardiac surgery,
cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, electrolyte disor-
ders, prolonged QT interval, central intracardiac
catheter). Synchronised cardioversion is the treat-
ment of choice for unstable VT with a pulse. Con-
sider antiarrhythmic therapy if a second cardiover-
sion dose is unsuccessful or if VT recurs. Amio-
darone has been shown to be safe and effective in
treating paediatric arrhythmias.198,202,203,209
Stable arrhythmias
Contact an expert before initiating therapy, while
maintaining the child’s ABC. Depending on the
S114
child’s clinical history, presentation and ECG diag-
nosis, a child with stable, wide-QRS-complex tachy-
cardia may be treated for SVT and be given vagal
manoeuvres or adenosine. Otherwise, consider
amiodarone as a treatment option; similarly, con-
sider amiodarone if the diagnosis of VT is confirmed
by ECG. Procainamide may also be considered in
stable SVT refractory to vagal manoeuvres and
adenosine210—212 as well as in stable VT.172,213,214
Do not give procainamide with amiodarone.
Post-arrest management
Myocardial dysfunction is common after cardiopul-
monary resuscitation.215,216 Vasoactive drugs may
improve the child’s post-arrest haemodynamic val-
ues, but the drugs must be titrated according to the
clinical condition. They must be given continuously
through an IV line.
Temperature control and management
Hypothermia is common in the child following car-
diopulmonary resuscitation.217 Central hypother-
mia (32—34 ◦ C) may be beneficial, whereas fever
may be detrimental to the injured brain of sur-
vivors. Although there are no paediatric studies,
mild hypothermia has an acceptable safety pro-
file in adults218,219 and neonates;220—224 it could
increase the number of neurologically intact sur-
vivors.
A child who regains a spontaneous circulation
but remains comatose after cardiopulmonary arrest
may benefit from being cooled to a core tem-
perature of 32—34 ◦ C for 12—24 h. The success-
fully resuscitated child with hypothermia and ROSC
should not be actively rewarmed unless the core
temperature is below 32 ◦ C. Following a period
of mild hypothermia, rewarm the child slowly at
0.25—0.5 ◦ C h−1 .
There are several methods to induce, moni-
tor and maintain body temperature in children.
External and/or internal cooling techniques can
be used to initiate cooling.225—227 Shivering can
be prevented by deep sedation and neuromuscular
blockade. Complications can occur and include an
increased risk of infection, cardiovascular instabil-
ity, coagulopathy, hyperglycaemia and electrolyte
abnormalities.228,229
The optimum target temperature, rate of cool-
ing, duration of hypothermia and rate of re-
warming after deliberate cooling have yet to be
determined; currently, no specific protocol for chil-
dren can be recommended.
D. Biarent et al.
Fever is common following cardiopulmonary
resuscitation; it is associated with a poor neuro-
logical outcome,230—232 the risk of which increases
with each degree of body temperature greater
than 37 ◦ C.230 There are limited experimental
data suggesting that the treatment of fever with
antipyretics and/or physical cooling reduces neu-
ronal damage.233,234 Antipyretics and accepted
drugs to treat fever are safe; therefore, use them
to treat fever aggressively.
Prognosis of cardiopulmonary arrest
There are no simple guidelines to determine when
resuscitative efforts become futile. After 20 min
of resuscitation, the team leader of the resus-
citation team should consider whether or not
to stop.187,235—239 The relevant considerations in
the decision to continue the resuscitation include
the cause of arrest,45,240 pre-existing conditions,
whether the arrest was witnessed, the duration
of untreated cardiopulmonary arrest (‘‘no flow’’),
the effectiveness and duration of CPR (‘‘low
flow’’), the promptness of extracorporeal life sup-
port for a reversible disease process241—243 and
associated special circumstances (e.g, icy water
drowning,9,244 exposure to toxic drugs).
Parental presence
The majority of parents would like to be present
during resuscitation and when any procedure is car-
ried out on their child.245—255 . Parents witnessing
their child’s resuscitation can see that everything
possible has been attempted.256—260 Furthermore,
they may have the opportunity to say goodbye to
their child; allowing parents to be at the side of
their child has been shown to help them gain a
realistic view of the attempted resuscitation and
the child’s death.261 Families who were present at
their child’s death showed less anxiety and depres-
sion, better adjustment and had an improved griev-
ing process when assessed several months later.260
Parental presence in the resuscitation room may
help healthcare providers maintain their profes-
sional behaviour while also helping them to see the
child as a human being and a family member.261
Family presence guidelines
A dedicated member of the resuscitation team
should be present with the parents to explain the
process in an empathetic manner, ensuring that
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
the parents do not interfere with or distract the
resuscitation. If the presence of the parents is
impeding the progress of the resuscitation, they
should be sensitively asked to leave. When appro-
priate, physical contact with the child should be
allowed and, wherever possible, the parents should
be allowed to be with their dying child at the final
moment.256,261—264
The leader of the resuscitation team, not the
parents, will decide when to stop the resuscita-
tion; this should be expressed with sensitivity and
understanding. After the event the team should be
debriefed, to enable any concerns to be expressed
and for the team to reflect on their clinical practice
in a supportive environment.
6c Resuscitation of babies at birth
Introduction
The following guidelines for resuscitation at birth
have been developed during the process that cul-
minated in the 2005 International Consensus Con-
ference on Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC)
and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Science
with Treatment Recommendations.265 They are an
extension of the guidelines already published by
the ERC,2 and take into account recommenda-
tions made by other national266 and international
organisations.267
The guidelines that follow do not define the only
way that resuscitation at birth should be achieved;
they merely represent a widely accepted view of
how resuscitation at birth can be carried out both
safely and effectively.
Preparation
Relatively few babies need any resuscitation at
birth. Of those that do need help, the overwhelm-
ing majority will require only assisted lung aera-
tion. A small minority may need a brief period of
chest compressions in addition to lung aeration.
Of 100,000 babies born in Sweden in 1 year, only
10 per 1000 (1%) babies weighing 2.5 kg or more
appeared to need resuscitation at delivery.268 Of
those babies receiving resuscitation, 8 per 1000
responded to mask inflation and only 2 per 1000
appeared to need intubation.268 The same study
tried to assess the unexpected need for resuscita-
tion at birth, and found that for low-risk babies, i.e.
those born after 32 weeks’ gestation and follow-
ing an apparently normal labour, about 2 per 1000
S115
(0.2%) appeared to need resuscitation at delivery.
Of these, 90% responded to mask inflation alone,
whereas the remaining 10% appeared not to respond
to mask inflation and therefore were intubated at
birth.
Resuscitation or specialist help at birth is more
likely to be needed by babies with intrapartum evi-
dence of significant fetal compromise, babies deliv-
ering before 35 weeks’ gestation, babies delivering
vaginally by the breech and multiple pregnancies.
Although it is often possible to predict the need
for resuscitation before a baby is born, this is not
always the case. Therefore, personnel trained in
newborn life support should be easily available at
every delivery and, should there be any need for
resuscitation, the care of the baby should be their
sole responsibility. One person experienced in tra-
cheal intubation of the newborn should also be
easily available for normal low-risk deliveries and,
ideally, in attendance for deliveries associated with
a high risk for neonatal resuscitation. Local guide-
lines indicating who should attend deliveries should
be developed based on current practice and clinical
audit.
An organised programme educating in the stan-
dards and skills required for resuscitation of the
newborn is therefore essential for any institution
in which deliveries occur.
Planned home deliveries
The recommendations for those who should attend
a planned home delivery vary from country to coun-
try, but the decision to undergo a planned home
delivery, once agreed by the medical and midwifery
staff, should not compromise the standard of ini-
tial resuscitation at birth. There will inevitably
be some limitations to resuscitation of a newborn
baby in the home because of the distance from
further assistance, and this must be made clear
to the mother at the time plans for home delivery
are made. Ideally, two trained professionals should
be present at all home deliveries;269 one of these
must be fully trained and experienced in providing
mask ventilation and chest compressions in the
newborn.
Equipment and environment
Resuscitation at birth is often a predictable event.
It is therefore simpler to prepare the environment
and the equipment before delivery of the baby
than is the case in adult resuscitation. Resuscita-
tion should ideally take place in a warm, well-lit,
draught-free area with a flat resuscitation surface
placed below a radiant heater and other resusci-
S116
tation equipment immediately available. All equip-
ment must be checked daily.
When a birth takes place in a non-designated
delivery area, the recommended minimum set of
equipment includes a device for safe, assisted lung
aeration of an appropriate size for the newborn,
warm dry towels and blankets, a clean (sterile)
instrument for cutting the umbilical cord and clean
gloves for the attendant. It may also be helpful to
have a suction device with a suitably sized suction
catheter and a tongue depressor (or laryngoscope),
to enable the oropharynx to be examined.
Temperature control
Naked, wet, newborn babies cannot maintain their
body temperature in a room that feels comfortably
warm for adults. Compromised babies are partic-
ularly vulnerable.270 Exposure of the newborn to
cold stress will lower arterial oxygen tension271 and
increase metabolic acidosis.272 Prevent heat loss by
• protecting the baby from draughts
• keeping the delivery room warm
• drying the term baby immediately after delivery.
Cover the head and body of the baby, apart from
the face, with a warm towel to prevent further
heat loss. Alternatively, place the baby skin to
skin with the mother and cover both with a towel
• placing the baby on a warm surface under a pre-
heated radiant warmer if resuscitation is needed
In very preterm babies (especially below 28
weeks’ gestation), drying and wrapping may not be
sufficiently effective. A more effective method of
keeping these babies warm is to cover the head and
body of the baby (apart from the face) with plas-
tic wrapping, without drying the baby beforehand,
and then to place the baby so covered under radiant
heat.
Initial assessment
The Apgar scoring system was not designed to iden-
tify prospectively babies needing resuscitation.273
Several studies have also suggested that it is
highly subjective.274 However, components of the
score, namely respiratory rate, heart rate and
colour, if assessed rapidly, can identify babies need-
ing resuscitation.275 Furthermore, repeated assess-
ment of these components can indicate whether the
baby is responding or whether further efforts are
needed.
D. Biarent et al.
Respiratory activity
Check whether the baby is breathing. If so, eval-
uate the rate, depth and symmetry of respiration,
together with any abnormal breathing pattern such
as gasping or grunting.
Heart rate
This is best evaluated by listening to the apex beat
with a stethoscope. Feeling the pulse in the base
of the umbilical cord is often effective but can be
misleading; cord pulsation is only reliable if found
to be more than 100 beats min−1 .276
Colour
A healthy baby is born blue but becomes pink within
30 s of the onset of effective breathing. Observe
whether the baby is centrally pink, cyanosed or
pale. Peripheral cyanosis is common and does not,
by itself, indicate hypoxaemia.
Tone
A very floppy baby is likely to be unconscious and is
likely to need respiratory support.
Tactile stimulation
Drying the baby usually produces enough stimula-
tion to induce effective respiration. Avoid more
vigorous methods of stimulation. If the baby fails
to establish spontaneous and effective respirations
following a brief period of stimulation, further sup-
port will be required.
Classification according to initial assessment
On the basis of the initial assessment, the babies
can usually be divided into four groups.
Group 1: vigorous breathing or crying
good tone
rapidly becoming pink
heart rate higher than 100 beats min−1
This baby requires no intervention other than
drying, wrapping in a warm towel and, where
appropriate, handing to the mother. The baby will
remain warm through skin-to-skin contact with
mother under a cover, and may be put to the breast
at this stage.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Group 2: breathing inadequately or apnoeic
remaining centrally blue
normal or reduced tone
heart rate less than 100 beats min−1
This baby may respond to tactile stimulation
and/or facial oxygen, but may need mask inflation.
Group 3: breathing inadequately or apnoeic
blue or pale
floppy
heart rate less than 100 beats min−1
This baby may improve with mask inflation but
may also require chest compressions.
Group 4: breathing inadequately or apnoeic
pale
floppy
no detectable heart rate
This baby will require immediate airway control,
lung inflation and ventilation. Once this has been
successfully accomplished, the baby may also need
chest compressions and perhaps drugs.
There remains a very rare group of babies who,
though breathing adequately and with a good heart
rate, remain blue. This group includes a range of
possible diagnoses such as diaphragmatic hernia,
surfactant deficiency, congenital pneumonia, pneu-
mothorax or cyanotic congenital heart disease.
Newborn life support
Commence newborn life support (Figure 6.10) if
assessment demonstrates that the baby has failed
to establish adequate regular normal breathing, or
has a heart rate of less than 100 beats min−1 . Open-
ing the airway and aerating the lungs is usually
all that is necessary. Furthermore, more complex
interventions will be futile unless these two first
steps have been successfully completed.
Airway
The baby should be on his or her back with the
head in a neutral position (Figure 6.11). A 2-cm
thickness of the blanket or towel placed under
the baby’s shoulder may be helpful in maintaining
proper head position. In floppy babies, application
of jaw thrust or the use of an appropriately sized
oropharyngeal airway may be helpful in opening the
airway.
Suction is needed only if there is particulate mat-
ter or blood obstructing the airway. Aggressive pha-
ryngeal suction can delay the onset of spontaneous
breathing and cause laryngeal spasm and vagal
S117
bradycardia.277 The presence of thick meconium in
a non-vigorous baby is the only indication for con-
sidering immediate suction. If suction is required,
it is best done under direct vision. Connect a 12—14
FG suction catheter, or a Yankauer sucker, to a suc-
tion source not exceeding −100 mmHg.
Breathing
There is currently insufficient evidence to specify
the concentration of oxygen to be used when start-
ing resuscitation. After initial steps at birth, if res-
piratory efforts are absent or inadequate, lung aer-
ation is the priority (Figure 6.12). The primary mea-
sure of adequate initial lung inflation is a prompt
improvement in heart rate; assess chest wall move-
ment if the heart rate does not improve.
For the first few breaths maintain the initial
inflation pressure for 2—3 s. This will help lung
expansion. Most babies needing resuscitation at
birth will respond with a rapid increase in heart
rate within 30 s of lung inflation. If the heart rate
increases but the baby is not breathing adequately,
continue ventilation at a rate of about 30 breaths
min−1 , allowing approximately 1 s for each infla-
tion, until there is adequate spontaneous breath-
ing.
Adequate passive ventilation is usually indicated
by either a rapidly increasing heart rate or a heart
rate that is maintained faster than 100 beats min−1 .
If the baby does not respond in this way, the
most likely reason is inadequate airway control or
ventilation. Look for passive chest movement in
time with inflation efforts; if these are present,
then lung aeration has been achieved. If these
are absent, then airway control and lung aeration
have not been confirmed. Without adequate lung
aeration chest compressions will be ineffective;
therefore, confirm lung aeration before progress-
ing to circulatory support. Some practitioners will
ensure lung aeration by tracheal intubation, but
this requires training and experience to be achieved
effectively. If this skill is not available and the heart
rate is decreasing, re-evaluate airway position and
deliver aeration breaths while summoning a col-
league with intubation skills.
Continue ventilatory support until the baby has
established normal regular breathing.
Circulatory support
Circulatory support with chest compressions is
effective only if the lungs have first been success-
fully inflated. Give chest compressions if the heart
rate is less than 60 beats min−1 despite adequate
ventilation. The optimal technique is to place the
S118
Figure 6.10 Newborn life support algorithm.
two thumbs side by side over the lower third of
the sternum, with the fingers encircling the torso
and supporting the back (Figure 6.13).21,22,25,278,279
The lower third of the sternum is compressed to a
Figure 6.11 Newborn head in neutral position. © 2005
Resuscitation Council (UK).
D. Biarent et al.
depth of approximately one third of the anterior-
posterior diameter of the chest. A compression to
relaxation ratio with a slightly shorter compres-
sion than relaxation phase offers theoretical advan-
tages for blood flow in the very young infant.280
Do not lift the thumbs off the sternum during
the relaxation phase, but allow the chest wall to
return to its relaxed position between compres-
sions. Use a 3:1 ratio of compressions to ventila-
tions, aiming to achieve approximately 120 events
min−1 , i.e. approximately 90 compressions and 30
breaths. However, the quality of the compressions
and breaths are more important than the rate.281
Check the heart rate after about 30 s and peri-
odically thereafter. Discontinue chest compressions
when the spontaneous heart rate is faster then 60
beats min−1 .
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Figure 6.12 Airway and ventilation — newborn. © 2005
Resuscitation Council (UK).
Drugs
Drugs are rarely indicated in resuscitation of the
newborn infant. Bradycardia in the newborn infant
is usually caused by inadequate lung inflation or
profound hypoxia, and establishing adequate ven-
tilation is the most important step to correct it.
However, if the heart rate remains less than 60
beats min−1 despite adequate ventilation and chest
compressions, drugs may be needed. These drugs
are presumed to exert their effect by their action
on the heart and are being given because cardiac
function is inadequate. It is therefore necessary to
give them as close to the heart as possible, ide-
ally via a rapidly inserted umbilical venous catheter
(Figure 6.14).
Adrenaline
Despite the lack of human data, it is reasonable to
continue to use adrenaline when adequate ventila-
tion and chest compressions have failed to increase
the heart rate above 60 beats min−1 . Use the IV
route as soon as venous access is established. The
recommended IV dose is 10—30 mcg kg−1 . The tra-
cheal route is not recommended (see below) but, if
Figure 6.13 Ventilation and chest compression — new-
born. © 2005 Resuscitation Council (UK).
S119
Figure 6.14 Newborn umbilical cord showing the arter-
ies and veins. © 2005 Resuscitation Council (UK).
it is used, it is highly likely that doses of 30 mcg kg−1
or less are ineffective. Try a higher dose (up to
100 mcg kg−1 ). The safety of these higher tracheal
doses has not been studied. Do not give high IV
doses.
Bicarbonate
If effective spontaneous cardiac output is not
restored despite adequate ventilation and ade-
quate chest compressions, reversing intracar-
diac acidosis may improve myocardial function
and achieve a spontaneous circulation. Give
1—2 mmol kg−1 IV.
Fluids
Consider volume expansion when there has been
suspected blood loss or the infant appears to be
in shock (pale, poor perfusion, weak pulse) and
has not responded adequately to other resuscita-
tive measures. In the absence of suitable blood
(i.e., irradiated and leucocyte-depleted group O
Rh-negative blood) isotonic crystalloid rather than
albumin is the solution of choice for restoring
intravascular volume in the delivery room. Give a
bolus of 10—20 ml kg−1 .
Stopping resuscitation
Local and national committees will determine the
indications for stopping resuscitation. However,
data from infants without signs of life from birth
lasting at least 10 min or longer show either high
mortality or severe neurodevelopmental disability.
After 10 min of continuous and adequate resusci-
tation efforts, discontinuation of resuscitation may
be justified if there are no signs of life.
S120
Communication with the parents
It is vitally important that the team caring for
the newborn baby informs the parents of the
baby’s progress. At delivery adhere to the routine
local plan and, if possible, hand the baby to the
mother at the earliest opportunity. If resuscitation
is required, inform the parents of the procedures
being undertaken and why they are required.
Decisions to discontinue resuscitation ideally
should involve senior paediatric staff. Whenever
possible, the decision to attempt resuscitation of
an extremely preterm baby should be taken in close
consultation with the parents and senior paediatric
and obstetric staff. Where a difficulty has been
foreseen, for example in the case of severe con-
genital malformation, the options and prognosis
should be discussed with the parents, midwives,
obstetricians and birth attendants before deliv-
ery.
All discussions and decisions should be carefully
recorded in the mother’s notes before delivery and
also in the baby’s records after birth.
Specific questions addressed at the
2005 Consensus Conference
Maintaining normal temperature in preterm
infants
Significantly, preterm babies are likely to become
hypothermic despite careful application of the tra-
ditional techniques for keeping them warm (dry-
ing, wrapping and placing under radiant heat).282
Several randomised controlled trials and observa-
tional studies have shown that placing preterm
babies under radiant heat and then covering the
babies with food-grade plastic wrapping, without
drying them, significantly improves temperature on
admission to intensive care compared with tra-
ditional techniques.283—285 The baby’s tempera-
ture must be monitored closely because of the
small but described risk of hyperthermia with this
technique.286 All resuscitation procedures, includ-
ing intubation, chest compression and insertion of
lines, can be achieved with the plastic cover in
place.
Infants born to febrile mothers have been
reported to have a higher incidence of perina-
tal respiratory depression, neonatal seizures, early
mortality and cerebral palsy.286—288 Animal stud-
ies indicate that hyperthermia during or following
ischaemia is associated with a progression of cere-
bral injury.233,289 Hyperthermia should be avoided.
D. Biarent et al.
Meconium
Five years ago, a large randomised controlled study
showed that attempting to intubate and aspirate
inhaled meconium from the tracheas of vigorous
infants at birth was not beneficial.290 A more recent
large multicentre randomised controlled study has
now shown that suctioning meconium from the
baby’s nose and mouth before delivery of the baby’s
chest (intrapartum suctioning) does not reduce
the incidence or severity of meconium aspiration
syndrome.291 Intrapartum suctioning is therefore
no longer recommended. Intubation and suction of
meconium from the trachea of non-vigorous infants
born through meconium-stained liquor is still rec-
ommended.
Air or 100% oxygen
Several studies in recent years have raised concerns
about the potential adverse effects of 100% oxygen
on respiratory physiology and cerebral circulation,
and the potential tissue damage from oxygen free
radicals. There are also concerns about tissue dam-
age from oxygen deprivation during and following
asphyxia. Studies examining blood pressure, cere-
bral perfusion, and various biochemical measures
of cell damage in asphyxiated animals resuscitated
with 100% versus 21% oxygen, have shown conflict-
ing results.292—296 One study of preterm infants
(below 33 weeks’ gestation) exposed to 80% oxy-
gen found lower cerebral blood flow when com-
pared with those stabilised with 21% oxygen.297
Some animal data indicate the opposite effect,
i.e. reduced blood pressure and cerebral perfu-
sion with air versus 100% oxygen.292 Meta-analysis
of four human studies demonstrated a reduction
in mortality and no evidence of harm in infants
resuscitated with air versus those resuscitated with
100% oxygen. However, there are several signifi-
cant concerns about the methodology of these stud-
ies, and these results should be interpreted with
caution.80,298
At present, the standard approach to resuscita-
tion is to use 100% oxygen. Some clinicians may
elect to start resuscitation with an oxygen con-
centration less than 100%, including some who
may start with air. Evidence suggests that this
approach may be reasonable. However, where pos-
sible, ensure supplemental oxygen is available
for use if there is no rapid improvement follow-
ing successful lung aeration. If supplemental oxy-
gen is not readily available, ventilate the lungs
with air. Supplemental oxygen is recommended
for babies who are breathing but have central
cyanosis.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Monitoring the oxygen saturation of babies
undergoing resuscitation may be useful, but stud-
ies have shown that term healthy newborns may
take more than 10 min to achieve a preductal oxy-
gen saturation above 95% and nearly an hour to
achieve this post-ductally.299—301 Giving a variable
concentration of oxygen guided by pulse oximetry
may improve the ability to achieve ‘normal’ oxy-
gen saturation values while more quickly avoiding
‘hyperoxia’, but the definition of these two terms
in the baby at birth are undetermined. Oxygen is a
drug, and oxidant injury is theoretically more likely
in preterm infants.
Initial breaths and assisted ventilation
In term infants, spontaneous or assisted initial
inflations create a functional residual capacity
(FRC).302—309 The optimum pressure, inflation time
and flow required to establish an effective FRC have
not been determined. Average initial peak inflat-
ing pressures of 30—40 cmH2 O (inflation time unde-
fined) usually ventilate unresponsive term infants
successfully.305—307,309 Assisted ventilation rates of
30—60 breaths min−1 are used commonly, but the
relative efficacy of various rates has not been inves-
tigated.
The primary measure of adequate initial ven-
tilation is prompt increase in heart rate; assess
passive chest wall movement if the heart rate
does not increase. The initial peak inflating pres-
sures needed are variable and unpredictable, and
should be individualised to achieve an increase in
heart rate or movement of the chest with each
breath. Where pressure is being monitored, an ini-
tial inflation pressure of 20 cmH2 O may be effec-
tive, but 30—40 cmH2 O or higher may be required
in some term babies. If pressure is not being moni-
tored but merely limited by a non-adjustable ‘blow-
off’ valve, use the minimum inflation required to
achieve an increase in heart rate. There is insuffi-
cient evidence to recommend an optimum inflation
time. In summary, provide artificial ventilation at
30—60 breaths min−1 to achieve or maintain a heart
rate higher than 100 beats min−1 promptly.
Assisted ventilation of preterm infants
Animal studies show that preterm lungs are eas-
ily damaged by large volume inflations immediately
after birth,310 and that maintaining a positive end-
expiratory pressure (PEEP) immediately after birth
protects against lung damage. PEEP also improves
lung compliance and gas exchange.311,312 Human
case series show that most apnoeic preterm infants
can be ventilated with an initial inflation pressure
S121
of 20—25 cmH2 O, though some infants appear to
require a higher pressure.313,314
When ventilating preterm infants, very obvious
passive chest wall movement may indicate exces-
sive tidal volumes and should be avoided. Monitor-
ing of pressure may help to provide consistent infla-
tions and avoid high pressures. If positive-pressure
ventilation is required, an initial inflation pres-
sure of 20—25 cmH2 O is adequate for most preterm
infants. If a prompt increase in heart rate or chest
movement is not obtained, higher pressures may
be needed. If continued positive-pressure ventila-
tion is required, PEEP may be beneficial. Continuous
positive airway pressure (CPAP) in spontaneously
breathing preterm infants following resuscitation
may also be beneficial.314
Devices
Effective ventilation can be achieved with either
a flow-inflating or self-inflating bag or with a
T-piece mechanical device designed to regu-
late pressure.315—317 The blow-off valves of self-
inflating bags are flow dependent, and pressures
generated may exceed the value specified by the
manufacturer.318 Target inflation pressures and long
inspiratory times are achieved more consistently in
mechanical models when using T-piece devices than
when using bags,319 although the clinical implica-
tions are not clear. More training is required to
provide an appropriate pressure using flow-inflating
bags compared with self-inflating bags.320 A self-
inflating bag, a flow-inflating bag or a T-piece
mechanical device, all designed to regulate pres-
sure or limit pressure applied to the airway, can be
used to ventilate a newborn.
Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) are effective
for ventilating newborn near-term and full-term
infants.321,322 There are few data on the use of
these devices in small preterm infants.323,324 Three
case series show that the LMA can provide effective
ventilation in a time frame consistent with current
resuscitation guidelines, although the babies being
studied were not being resuscitated.322,325,326 A
randomised controlled trial found no clinically
significant difference between the LMA and tra-
cheal intubation when bag-mask ventilation was
unsuccessful.321 It is unclear whether the conclu-
sions of this study can be generalized, since the
LMA was inserted by experienced providers. Case
reports suggest that when bag-mask ventilation has
been unsuccessful and tracheal intubation is unfea-
sible or unsuccessful, the LMA may provide effec-
tive ventilation.327—329 There is insufficient evi-
dence to support the routine use of the LMA as the
primary airway device for resuscitation at birth.
S122
Table 6.1 Calculation of tracheal tube size and depth of insertiona
Child’s weight (kg) Gestation (weeks)
<1 <28
1—2 28—34
2—3 34—38
>3 >38
a Depth of insertion from the upper lip can be estimated as insertion depth at lip (cm) = weight in kg + 6 cm.
There are also reservations concerning its effec-
tiveness in the following situations
• when chest compressions are required
• for very low birth weight (VLBW) babies
• when the amniotic fluid is meconium stained
Confirming tracheal tube placement
Tracheal intubation may be considered at several
points during neonatal resuscitation
• when suctioning to remove meconium or other
tracheal blockage is required
• if bag-mask ventilation is ineffective or pro-
longed
• when chest compressions are performed
• in special circumstances (e.g., congenital
diaphragmatic hernia or birth weight below
1000 g)
The use and timing of tracheal intubation will
depend on the skill and experience of the available
resuscitators.
Following tracheal intubation and intermittent
positive pressure, a prompt increase in heart rate
is the best indicator that the tube is in the tracheo-
bronchial tree.330 Exhaled CO2 detection is effec-
tive for confirmation of tracheal tube placement
in infants, including VLBW infants.331—334 Detection
of exhaled CO2 in patients with adequate cardiac
output confirms placement of the tube within the
trachea, whereas failure to detect exhaled CO2
strongly suggests oesophageal intubation.331,333
Poor or absent pulmonary blood flow or tracheal
obstruction may prevent detection of exhaled CO2
despite correct tracheal tube placement. Tracheal
tube placement is identified correctly in nearly all
patients who are not in cardiac arrest99 ; however, in
critically ill infants with poor cardiac output, inabil-
ity to detect exhaled CO2 despite correct place-
ment may lead to unnecessary extubation. Other
clinical indicators of correct tracheal tube place-
ment include evaluation of condensed humidified
gas during exhalation and presence or absence of
chest movement, but these have not been evalu-
ated systematically in newborn babies.
D. Biarent et al.
Tube size (mm ID) Depth of insertion (cm)a
2.5 6.5—7
3.0 7—8
3.0/3.5 8—9
3.5/4.0 >9
Tracheal tube placement (Table 6.1) must be
assessed visually during intubation and, in most
cases, will be confirmed by a rapid increase in heart
rate on ventilating via the tracheal tube. If the
heart rate remains slow, incorrect tube placement
is the most likely cause. Check tube place-
ment either visually or by detection of exhaled
CO2 .
Route and dose of adrenaline
There are no placebo-controlled studies that have
evaluated the use of adrenaline at any stage
in human neonatal resuscitation. A paediatric
study148 and newborn animal studies335,336 showed
no benefit and a trend toward reduced sur-
vival and worse neurological status after high-
dose IV adrenaline (100 mcg kg−1 ) during resusci-
tation. Animal and adult human studies demon-
strate that, when given via the trachea, consid-
erably higher doses of adrenaline than currently
recommended are required to achieve adequate
plasma concentrations.337—339 One neonatal ani-
mal study using the currently recommended dose
of tracheal adrenaline (10 mcg kg−1 ) showed no
benefit.126 One neonatal cohort study of nine
preterm babies requiring resuscitation showed
that tracheal adrenaline was absorbed, but these
workers used 7—25 times the dose recommended
currently.340
Post-resuscitation care
Babies who have required resuscitation may dete-
riorate. Once adequate ventilation and circulation
are established, the infant should be maintained
in or transferred to an environment in which close
monitoring and anticipatory care can be provided.
Glucose
Hypoglycaemia was associated with adverse neu-
rological outcome in a neonatal animal model
of asphyxia and resuscitation.341 Newborn ani-
mals which were hypoglycaemic at the time of
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
an anoxic or hypoxic-ischaemic insult had larger
areas of cerebral infarction and/or decreased sur-
vival compared with controls.342,343 One clinical
study demonstrated an association between hypo-
glycaemia and poor neurological outcome following
perinatal asphyxia.344 No clinical neonatal studies
have investigated the relationship between hyper-
glycaemia and neurological outcome, although in
adults hyperglycaemia is associated with a worse
outcome.345 The range of blood glucose concentra-
tion that is associated with the least brain injury
following asphyxia and resuscitation cannot be
defined on available evidence. Infants who require
significant resuscitation should be monitored and
treated to maintain blood glucose within the nor-
mal range.
Induced hypothermia
In a multicentre trial involving newborns with
suspected asphyxia (indicated by need for resus-
citation at birth, metabolic acidosis and early
encephalopathy), selective head cooling (34.5 ◦ C)
was associated with a non-significant reduction in
the number of survivors with severe disability at
18 months, but a significant benefit in the sub-
group with moderate encephalopathy as judged
by amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram.220
Infants with severe electroencephalographic sup-
pression and seizures did not benefit from
treatment.346 A second, small, controlled pilot
study in asphyxiated infants with early induced
systemic hypothermia resulted in fewer deaths
and disabilities at 12 months. Modest hypother-
mia is associated with bradycardia and ele-
vated blood pressure that do not usually require
treatment, but a rapid increase in body tem-
perature may cause hypotension.347 Profound
hypothermia (core temperature below 33 ◦ C) may
cause arrhythmia, bleeding, thrombosis and sep-
sis, but studies so far have not reported these
complications in infants treated with modest
hypothermia.220,348
There are insufficient data to recommend rou-
tine use of modest systemic or selective cere-
bral hypothermia following resuscitation of infants
with suspected asphyxia. Further clinical trials are
needed to determine which infants benefit most
and which method of cooling is most effective.
Withholding or discontinuing resuscitation
Mortality and morbidity for newborns varies accord-
ing to region and to availability of resources.349
Social science studies indicate that parents desire
a larger role in decisions to resuscitate and to
S123
continue life support in severely compromised
babies.350 There is considerable variability among
providers about the benefits and disadvantages of
aggressive therapies in such babies.351,352
Withholding resuscitation
It is possible to identify conditions associated with
high mortality and poor outcome, where withhold-
ing resuscitation may be considered reasonable,
particularly when there has been the opportunity
for discussion with parents.282,353 A consistent and
coordinated approach to individual cases by the
obstetric and neonatal teams and the parents is an
important goal. Withholding resuscitation and dis-
continuation of life-sustaining treatment during or
following resuscitation are considered by many to
be ethically equivalent, and clinicians should not
be hesitant to withdraw support when the possi-
bility of functional survival is highly unlikely. The
following guidelines must be interpreted according
to current regional outcomes.
• Where gestation, birth weight and/or congeni-
tal anomalies are associated with almost certain
early death, and unacceptably high morbidity is
likely among the rare survivors, resuscitation is
not indicated. Examples from the published liter-
ature include extreme prematurity (gestational
age <23 weeks and/or birthweight <400 g), and
anomalies such as anencephaly and confirmed tri-
somy 13 or 18.
• Resuscitation is nearly always indicated in con-
ditions associated with a high survival rate and
acceptable morbidity. This will generally include
babies with gestational age of 25 weeks or
above (unless there is evidence of fetal compro-
mise such as intrauterine infection or hypoxia-
ischaemia) and those with most congenital mal-
formations.
• In conditions associated with uncertain progno-
sis, where there is borderline survival and a rel-
atively high rate of morbidity, and where the
anticipated burden to the child is high, parental
desires regarding resuscitation should be sup-
ported.
Withdrawing resuscitation efforts
Data from infants without signs of life from
birth, lasting at least 10 min or longer, show
either high mortality or severe neurodevelopmental
disability.354,355 After 10 min of uninterrupted and
adequate resuscitation efforts, discontinuation of
resuscitation may be justified if there are no signs
of life.
S124
References
1. Zideman D, Bingham R, Beattie T, et al. Guidelines for
paediatric life support: a Statement by the Paediatric Life
Support Working Party of the European Resuscitation Coun-
cil. Resuscitation 1994;27:91—105.
2. European Resuscitation Council. Paediatric life support:
(including the recommendations for resuscitation of babies
at birth). Resuscitation 1998;37:95—6.
3. Phillips B, Zideman D, Garcia-Castrillo L, Felix M, Shwarz-
Schwierin U. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines
2000 for Basic Paediatric Life Support. A statement from
the Paediatric Life Support Working Group and approved
by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation
Council. Resuscitation 2001;48:223—9.
4. Phillips B, Zideman D, Garcia-Castrillo L, Felix M, Shwarz-
Schwierin V. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines
2000 for Advanced Paediatric Life Support. A statement
from Paediatric Life Support Working Group and approved
by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation
Council. Resuscitation 2001;48:231—4.
5. American Heart Association in collaboration with Interna-
tional Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Guidelines for
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovas-
cular Care—–an international consensus on science. Resus-
citation 2000;46:3—430.
6. American Heart Association in collaboration with Interna-
tional Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Guidelines 2000
for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardio-
vascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Circu-
lation 2000;102(Suppl. I):I-1—I-370.
7. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005
International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treat-
ment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2005;67:157—341.
8. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005
International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treat-
ment Recommendations. Circulation, in press.
9. Kuisma M, Suominen P, Korpela R. Paediatric out-of-hospital
cardiac arrests: epidemiology and outcome. Resuscitation
1995;30:141—50.
10. Kyriacou DN, Arcinue EL, Peek C, Kraus JF. Effect of imme-
diate resuscitation on children with submersion injury.
Pediatrics 1994;94:137—42.
11. Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Ewy GA. Bystander’’
chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently
improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless ‘‘cardiac
arrest’’. Circulation 2000;101:1743—8.
12. Young KD, Seidel JS. Pediatric cardiopulmonary resus-
citation: a collective review. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:
195—205.
13. Berg RA, Hilwig RW, Kern KB, Babar I, Ewy GA. Simu-
lated mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions
(bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation) improves out-
come in a swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial
cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1893—9.
14. Dorph E, Wik L, Steen PA. Effectiveness of ventilation-
compression ratios 1:5 and 2:15 in simulated single res-
cuer paediatric resuscitation. Resuscitation 2002;54:259—
64.
15. Turner I, Turner S, Armstrong V. Does the compression to
ventilation ratio affect the quality of CPR: a simulation
study. Resuscitation 2002;52:55—62.
16. Babbs CF, Kern KB. Optimum compression to ventila-
tion ratios in CPR under realistic, practical conditions:
D. Biarent et al.
a physiological and mathematical analysis. Resuscitation
2002;54:147—57.
17. Babbs CF, Nadkarni V. Optimizing chest compression to res-
cue ventilation ratios during one-rescuer CPR by profes-
sionals and lay persons: children are not just little adults.
Resuscitation 2004;61:173—81.
18. Whyte SD, Wyllie JP. Paediatric basic life support: a prac-
tical assessment. Resuscitation 1999;41:153—217.
19. Safranek DJ, Eisenberg MS, Larsen MP. The epidemiol-
ogy of cardiac arrest in young adults. Ann Emerg Med
1992;21:1102—6.
20. Clements F, McGowan J. Finger position for chest com-
pressions in cardiac arrest in infants. Resuscitation
2000;44:43—6.
21. Houri PK, Frank LR, Menegazzi JJ, Taylor R. A randomized,
controlled trial of two-thumb vs two-finger chest compres-
sion in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Prehosp
Emerg Care 1997;1:65—7.
22. David R. Closed chest cardiac massage in the newborn
infant. Pediatrics 1988;81:552—4.
23. Dorfsman ML, Menegazzi JJ, Wadas RJ, Auble TE. Two-
thumb vs two-finger chest compression in an infant model
of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg
Med 2000;7:1077—82.
24. Whitelaw CC, Slywka B, Goldsmith LJ. Comparison of a two-
finger versus two-thumb method for chest compressions by
healthcare providers in an infant mechanical model. Resus-
citation 2000;43:213—6.
25. Menegazzi JJ, Auble TE, Nicklas KA, Hosack GM, Rack L,
Goode JS. Two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression
during CRP in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Ann
Emerg Med 1993;22:240—3.
26. Stevenson AG, McGowan J, Evans AL, Graham CA. CPR for
children: one hand or two? Resuscitation 2005;64:205—8.
27. Gurnett CA, Atkins DL. Successful use of a biphasic wave-
form automated external defibrillator in a high-risk child.
Am J Cardiol 2000;86:1051—3.
28. Konig B, Benger J, Goldsworthy L. Automatic external
defibrillation in a 6 year old. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:310—1.
29. Atkinson E, Mikysa B, Conway JA, et al. Specificity and sen-
sitivity of automated external defibrillator rhythm analysis
in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:185—96.
30. Cecchin F, Jorgenson DB, Berul CI, et al. Is arrhythmia
detection by automatic external defibrillator accurate for
children? Sensitivity and specificity of an automatic exter-
nal defibrillator algorithm in 696 pediatric arrhythmias.
Circulation 2001;103:2483—8.
31. Samson R, Berg R, Bingham R. Pediatric Advanced Life Sup-
port Task Force ILCoR. Use of automated external defibril-
lators for children: an update. An advisory statement from
the Pediatric Advanced Life Support Task Force of the Inter-
national Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation
2003;57:237—43.
32. Jorgenson D, Morgan C, Snyder D, et al. Energy attenuator
for pediatric application of an automated external defib-
rillator. Crit Care Med 2002;30:S145—7.
33. Tang W, Weil MH, Jorgenson D, et al. Fixed-energy bipha-
sic waveform defibrillation in a pediatric model of cardiac
arrest and resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2736—41.
34. Berg RA, Chapman FW, Berg MD, et al. Attenuated adult
biphasic shocks compared with weight-based monophasic
shocks in a swine model of prolonged pediatric ventricular
fibrillation. Resuscitation 2004;61:189—97.
35. Berg RA, Samson RA, Berg MD, et al. Better outcome after
pediatric defibrillation dosage than adult dosage in a swine
model of pediatric ventricular fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol
2005;45:786—9.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
36. Rossano JQ, Schiff L, Kenney MA, Atkins DL. Survival
is not correlated with defibrillation dosing in pedi-
atric out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation
2003;108:320—1.
37. Clark CB, Zhang Y, Davies LR, Karlsson G, Kerber RE. Pedi-
atric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monopha-
sic waveforms in an experimental model. Resuscitation
2001;51:159—63.
38. Schneider T, Martens PR, Paschen H, et al. Multicenter,
randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks com-
pared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resusci-
tation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized
Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators. Circula-
tion 2000;102:1780—7.
39. Faddy SC, Powell J, Craig JC. Biphasic and monophasic
shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of
randomised controlled trials. Resuscitation 2003;58:9—16.
40. van Alem AP, Chapman FW, Lank P, Hart AA, Koster
RW. A prospective, randomised and blinded compari-
son of first shock success of monophasic and biphasic
waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation
2003;58:17—24.
41. Redding JS. The choking controversy: critique of evidence
on the Heimlich maneuver. Crit Care Med 1979;7:475—9.
42. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Part 2.
Adult Basic Life Support. 2005 International Consensus
on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardio-
vascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
Resuscitation 2005;67:187—200.
43. Sirbaugh PE, Pepe PE, Shook JE, et al. A prospective,
population-based study of the demographics, epidemi-
ology, management, and outcome of out-of-hospital
pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. Ann Emerg Med
1999;33:174—84.
44. Hickey RW, Cohen DM, Strausbaugh S, Dietrich AM. Pedi-
atric patients requiring CPR in the prehospital setting. Ann
Emerg Med 1995;25:495—501.
45. Reis AG, Nadkarni V, Perondi MB, Grisi S, Berg RA. A
prospective investigation into the epidemiology of in-
hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation using
the international Utstein reporting style. Pediatrics
2002;109:200—9.
46. Young KD, Gausche-Hill M, McClung CD, Lewis RJ. A
prospective, population-based study of the epidemiology
and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary
arrest. Pediatrics 2004;114:157—64.
47. Richman PB, Nashed AH. The etiology of cardiac arrest in
children and young adults: special considerations for ED
management. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:264—70.
48. Engdahl J, Bang A, Karlson BW, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J. Char-
acteristics and outcome among patients suffering from out
of hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac aetiology. Resus-
citation 2003;57:33—41.
49. Carcillo JA. Pediatric septic shock and multiple organ fail-
ure. Crit Care Clin 2003;19:413—40, viii.
50. Eberle B, Dick WF, Schneider T, Wisser G, Doetsch S,
Tzanova I. Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic
accuracy of first responders in patients with and without
a pulse. Resuscitation 1996;33:107—16.
51. Moule P. Checking the carotid pulse: diagnostic accuracy
in students of the healthcare professions. Resuscitation
2000;44:195—201.
52. Lapostolle F, Le Toumelin P, Agostinucci JM, Catineau J,
Adnet F. Basic cardiac life support providers checking the
carotid pulse: performance, degree of conviction, and
influencing factors. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:878—80.
S125
53. Frederick K, Bixby E, Orzel MN, Stewart-Brown S, Willett
K. Will changing the emphasis from ‘pulseless’ to ‘no signs
of circulation’ improve the recall scores for effective life
support skills in children? Resuscitation 2002;55:255—61.
54. Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Do SH, Lee KH. The laryn-
geal mask airway in infants and children. Can J Anaesth
2001;48:413—7.
55. Hedges JR, Dronen SC, Feero S, Hawkins S, Syverud SA,
Shultz B. Succinylcholine-assisted intubations in prehospi-
tal care. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:469—72.
56. Murphy-Macabobby M, Marshall WJ, Schneider C, Dries D.
Neuromuscular blockade in aeromedical airway manage-
ment. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:664—8.
57. Sayre M, Weisgerber I. The use of neuromuscular block-
ing agents by air medical services. J Air Med Transp
1992;11:7—11.
58. Rose W, Anderson L, Edmond S. Analysis of intubations.
Before and after establishment of a rapid sequence intuba-
tion protocol for air medical use. Air Med J 1994;13:475—8.
59. Sing RF, Reilly PM, Rotondo MF, Lynch MJ, McCans JP,
Schwab CW. Out-of-hospital rapid-sequence induction for
intubation of the pediatric patient. Acad Emerg Med
1996;3:41—5.
60. Ma OJ, Atchley RB, Hatley T, Green M, Young J, Brady W.
Intubation success rates improve for an air medical pro-
gram after implementing the use of neuromuscular block-
ing agents. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:125—7.
61. Tayal V, Riggs R, Marx J, Tomaszewski C, Schneider R. Rapid-
sequence intubation at an emergency medicine residency:
success rate and adverse events during a two-year period.
Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:31—7.
62. Wang HE, Sweeney TA, O’Connor RE, Rubinstein H.
Failed prehospital intubations: an analysis of emergency
department courses and outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care
2001;5:134—41.
63. Sagarin MJ, Chiang V, Sakles JC, et al. Rapid sequence
intubation for pediatric emergency airway management.
Pediatr Emerg Care 2002;18:417—43.
64. Kaye K, Frascone RJ, Held T. Prehospital rapid-sequence
intubation: a pilot training program. Prehosp Emerg Care
2003;7:235—40.
65. Wang HE, Kupas DF, Paris PM, Bates RR, Costantino JP, Yealy
DM. Multivariate predictors of failed prehospital endotra-
cheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:717—24.
66. Pepe P, Zachariah B, Chandra N. Invasive airway technique
in resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 1991;22:393—403.
67. Luten RC, Wears RL, Broselow J, et al. Length-based endo-
tracheal tube and emergency equipment in pediatrics. Ann
Emerg Med 1992;21:900—4.
68. Deakers TW, Reynolds G, Stretton M, Newth CJ. Cuffed
endotracheal tubes in pediatric intensive care. J Pediatr
1994;125:57—62.
69. Khine HH, Corddry DH, Kettrick RG, et al. Compar-
ison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in
young children during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology
1997;86:627—31.
70. Newth CJ, Rachman B, Patel N, Hammer J. The use of
cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric
intensive care. J Pediatr 2004;144:333—7.
71. Mhanna MJ, Zamel YB, Tichy CM, Super DM. The ‘‘air leak’’
test around the endotracheal tube, as a predictor of pos-
textubation stridor, is age dependent in children. Crit Care
Med 2002;30:2639—43.
72. Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by
paramedics in an urban emergency medical services sys-
tem. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:32—7.
S126
73. Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al. Effect of out-
of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation on survival
and neurological outcome: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA
2000;283:783—90.
74. Kelly JJ, Eynon CA, Kaplan JL, de Garavilla L, Dalsey WC.
Use of tube condensation as an indicator of endotracheal
tube placement. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:575—8.
75. Andersen KH, Hald A. Assessing the position of the tra-
cheal tube: the reliability of different methods. Anaesthe-
sia 1989;44:984—5.
76. Andersen KH, Schultz-Lebahn T. Oesophageal intubation
can be undetected by auscultation of the chest. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:580—2.
77. Hartrey R, Kestin IG. Movement of oral and nasal tracheal
tubes as a result of changes in head and neck position.
Anaesthesia 1995;50:682—7.
78. Van de Louw A, Cracco C, Cerf C, et al. Accuracy of pulse
oximetry in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med
2001;27:1606—13.
79. Seguin P, Le Rouzo A, Tanguy M, Guillou YM, Feuillu A,
Malledant Y. Evidence for the need of bedside accuracy
of pulse oximetry in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med
2000;28:703—6.
80. Tan A, Schulze A, O’Donnell CP, Davis PG. Air versus oxygen
for resuscitation of infants at birth. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2004:CD002273.
81. Ramji S, Rasaily R, Mishra PK, et al. Resuscitation of asphyx-
iated newborns with room air or 100% oxygen at birth: a
multicentric clinical trial. Indian Pediatr 2003;40:510—7.
82. Vento M, Asensi M, Sastre J, Garcia-Sala F, Pallardo FV,
Vina J. Resuscitation with room air instead of 100% oxygen
prevents oxidative stress in moderately asphyxiated term
neonates. Pediatrics 2001;107:642—7.
83. Saugstad OD. Resuscitation of newborn infants with room
air or oxygen. Semin Neonatol 2001;6:233—9.
84. Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a
common and life-threatening problem during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2004;32:S345—51.
85. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al.
Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Circulation 2004;109:1960—5.
86. Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest. JAMA 2005;293:299—304.
87. Abella BS, Alvarado JP, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of
cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac
arrest. AMA 2005;293:305—10.
88. Abella BS, Sandbo N, Vassilatos P, et al. Chest compression
rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal:
a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Cir-
culation 2005;111:428—34.
89. Borke WB, Munkeby BH, Morkrid L, Thaulow E, Saugstad
OD. Resuscitation with 100% O(2) does not protect the
myocardium in hypoxic newborn piglets. Arch Dis Child
Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F156—60.
90. Stockinger ZT, McSwain Jr NE. Prehospital endotracheal
intubation for trauma does not improve survival over bag-
valve-mask ventilation. J Trauma 2004;56:531—6.
91. Pitetti R, Glustein JZ, Bhende MS. Prehospital care and out-
come of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehosp
Emerg Care 2002;6:283—90.
92. Cooper A, DiScala C, Foltin G, Tunik M, Markenson D,
Welborn C. Prehospital endotracheal intubation for severe
head injury in children: a reappraisal. Semin Pediatr Surg
2001;10:3—6.
93. Bhende MS, Thompson AE, Cook DR, Saville AL. Validity of a
disposable end-tidal CO2 detector in verifying endotracheal
D. Biarent et al.
tube placement in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med
1992;21:142—5.
94. Bhende MS, Thompson AE, Orr RA. Utility of an end-tidal
carbon dioxide detector during stabilization and trans-
port of critically ill children. Pediatrics 1992;89(pt 1):
1042—4.
95. Bhende MS, LaCovey DC. End-tidal carbon dioxide mon-
itoring in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care
2001;5:208—13.
96. Ornato JP, Shipley JB, Racht EM, et al. Multicenter study of
a portable, hand-size, colorimetric end-tidal carbon diox-
ide detection device. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:518—23.
97. Gonzalez del Rey JA, Poirier MP, Digiulio GA. Evaluation
of an ambu-bag valve with a self-contained, colorimetric
end-tidal CO2 system in the detection of airway mishaps:
an animal trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000;16:121—3.
98. Bhende MS, Thompson AE. Evaluation of an end-tidal CO2
detector during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Pediatrics 1995;95:395—9.
99. Bhende MS, Karasic DG, Karasic RB. End-tidal carbon diox-
ide changes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation after
experimental asphyxial cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med
1996;14:349—50.
100. DeBehnke DJ, Hilander SJ, Dobler DW, Wickman LL, Swart
GL. The hemodynamic and arterial blood gas response to
asphyxiation: a canine model of pulseless electrical activ-
ity. Resuscitation 1995;30:169—75.
101. Ornato JP, Garnett AR, Glauser FL. Relationship between
cardiac output and the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension.
Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1104—6.
102. Sharieff GQ, Rodarte A, Wilton N, Silva PD, Bleyle D. The
self-inflating bulb as an esophageal detector device in chil-
dren weighing more than twenty kilograms: a comparison
of two techniques. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41:623—9.
103. Sharieff GQ, Rodarte A, Wilton N, Bleyle D. The self-
inflating bulb as an airway adjunct: is it reliable in chil-
dren weighing less than 20 kilograms? Acad Emerg Med
2003;10:303—8.
104. Poirier MP, Gonzalez Del-Rey JA, McAneney CM, DiGiulio GA.
Utility of monitoring capnography, pulse oximetry, and vital
signs in the detection of airway mishaps: a hyperoxemic
animal model. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:350—2.
105. Lillis KA, Jaffe DM. Prehospital intravenous access in chil-
dren. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:1430—4.
106. Kanter RK, Zimmerman JJ, Strauss RH, Stoeckel KA. Pedi-
atric emergency intravenous access. Evaluation of a proto-
col. Am J Dis Child 1986;140:132—4.
107. Banerjee S, Singhi SC, Singh S, Singh M. The intraosseous
route is a suitable alternative to intravenous route for fluid
resuscitation in severely dehydrated children. Indian Pedi-
atr 1994;31:1511—20.
108. Glaeser PW, Hellmich TR, Szewczuga D, Losek JD, Smith DS.
Five-year experience in prehospital intraosseous infusions
in children and adults. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1119—24.
109. Guy J, Haley K, Zuspan SJ. Use of intraosseous infu-
sion in the pediatric trauma patient. J Pediatr Surg
1993;28:158—61.
110. Orlowski JP, Julius CJ, Petras RE, Porembka DT, Gal-
lagher JM. The safety of intraosseous infusions: risks of
fat and bone marrow emboli to the lungs. Ann Emerg Med
1989;18:1062—7.
111. Orlowski JP, Porembka DT, Gallagher JM, Lockrem JD, Van-
Lente F. Comparison study of intraosseous, central intra-
venous, and peripheral intravenous infusions of emergency
drugs. Am J Dis Child 1990;144:112—7.
112. Abe KK, Blum GT, Yamamoto LG. Intraosseous is faster
and easier than umbilical venous catheterization in new-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
born emergency vascular access models. Am J Emerg Med
2000;18:126—9.
113. Ellemunter H, Simma B, Trawoger R, Maurer H. Intraosseous
lines in preterm and full term neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F74—5.
114. Cameron JL, Fontanarosa PB, Passalaqua AM. A compar-
ative study of peripheral to central circulation delivery
times between intraosseous and intravenous injection using
a radionuclide technique in normovolemic and hypovolemic
canines. J Emerg Med 1989;7:123—7.
115. Warren DW, Kissoon N, Sommerauer JF, Rieder MJ. Compari-
son of fluid infusion rates among peripheral intravenous and
humerus, femur, malleolus, and tibial intraosseous sites
in normovolemic and hypovolemic piglets. Ann Emerg Med
1993;22:183—6.
116. Brickman KR, Krupp K, Rega P, Alexander J, Guinness M.
Typing and screening of blood from intraosseous access.
Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:414—7.
117. Johnson L, Kissoon N, Fiallos M, Abdelmoneim T, Murphy
S. Use of intraosseous blood to assess blood chemistries
and hemoglobin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with
drug infusions. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1147—52.
118. Ummenhofer W, Frei FJ, Urwyler A, Drewe J. Are labora-
tory values in bone marrow aspirate predictable for venous
blood in paediatric patients? Resuscitation 1994;27:123—
8.
119. Kissoon N, Idris A, Wenzel V, Murphy S, Rush W. Intraosseous
and central venous blood acid—base relationship dur-
ing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatr Emerg Care
1997;13:250—3.
120. Abdelmoneim T, Kissoon N, Johnson L, Fiallos M, Mur-
phy S. Acid-base status of blood from intraosseous and
mixed venous sites during prolonged cardiopulmonary
resuscitation and drug infusions. Crit Care Med 1999;27:
1923—8.
121. Venkataraman ST, Orr RA, Thompson AE. Percutaneous infr-
aclavicular subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill
infants and children. J Pediatr 1988;113:480—5.
122. Fleisher G, Caputo G, Baskin M. Comparison of external
jugular and peripheral venous administration of sodium
bicarbonate in puppies. Crit Care Med 1989;17:251—4.
123. Hedges JR, Barsan WB, Doan LA, et al. Central versus
peripheral intravenous routes in cardiopulmonary resusci-
tation. Am J Emerg Med 1984;2:385—90.
124. Neufeld JD, Marx JA, Moore EE, Light AI. Comparison of
intraosseous, central, and peripheral routes of crystalloid
infusion for resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in a swine
model. J Trauma 1993;34:422—8.
125. Stenzel JP, Green TP, Fuhrman BP, Carlson PE, Marches-
sault RP. Percutaneous femoral venous catheteriza-
tions: a prospective study of complications. J Pediatr
1989;114:411—5.
126. Kleinman ME, Oh W, Stonestreet BS. Comparison of intra-
venous and endotracheal epinephrine during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation in newborn piglets. Crit Care Med
1999;27:2748—54.
127. Efrati O, Ben-Abraham R, Barak A, et al. Endo-
bronchial adrenaline: should it be reconsidered? Dose
response and haemodynamic effect in dogs. Resuscitation
2003;59:117—22.
128. Howard RF, Bingham RM. Endotracheal compared with
intravenous administration of atropine. Arch Dis Child
1990;65:449—50.
129. Prengel AW, Lindner KH, Hahnel J, Ahnefeld FW. Endotra-
cheal and endobronchial lidocaine administration: effects
on plasma lidocaine concentration and blood gases. Crit
Care Med 1991;19:911—5.
S127
130. Crespo SG, Schoffstall JM, Fuhs LR, Spivey WH. Compari-
son of two doses of endotracheal epinephrine in a cardiac
arrest model. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:230—4.
131. Lee PL, Chung YT, Lee BY, Yeh CY, Lin SY, Chao CC. The
optimal dose of atropine via the endotracheal route. Ma
Zui Xue Za Zhi 1989;27:35—8.
132. Hahnel JH, Lindner KH, Schurmann C, Prengel A, Ahnefeld
FW. Plasma lidocaine levels and PaO2 with endobronchial
administration: dilution with normal saline or distilled
water? Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1314—7.
133. Jasani MS, Nadkarni VM, Finkelstein MS, Mandell GA,
Salzman SK, Norman ME. Effects of different techniques
of endotracheal epinephrine administration in pediatric
porcine hypoxic-hypercarbic cardiopulmonary arrest. Crit
Care Med 1994;22:1174—80.
134. Steinfath M, Scholz J, Schulte am Esch J, Laer S, Reymann
A, Scholz H. The technique of endobronchial lidocaine
administration does not influence plasma concentration
profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters in humans. Resus-
citation 1995;29:55—62.
135. Carcillo JA, Fields AI. Clinical practice parameters for
hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal patients
in septic shock. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1365—78.
136. Simma B, Burger R, Falk M, Sacher P, Fanconi S. A prospec-
tive, randomized, and controlled study of fluid man-
agement in children with severe head injury: lactated
Ringer’s solution versus hypertonic saline. Crit Care Med
1998;26:1265—70.
137. Rocha e Silva M. Hypertonic saline resuscitation. Medicina
(B Aries) 1998; 58:393-402.
138. Katz LM, Wang Y, Ebmeyer U, Radovsky A, Safar P. Glu-
cose plus insulin infusion improves cerebral outcome after
asphyxial cardiac arrest. Neuroreport 1998;9:3363—7.
139. Longstreth Jr WT, Copass MK, Dennis LK, Rauch-Matthews
ME, Stark MS, Cobb LA. Intravenous glucose after out-of-
hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: a community-based ran-
domized trial. Neurology 1993;43:2534—41.
140. Chang YS, Park WS, Ko SY, et al. Effects of fasting
and insulin-induced hypoglycemia on brain cell membrane
function and energy metabolism during hypoxia-ischemia
in newborn piglets. Brain Res 1999;844:135—42.
141. Cherian L, Goodman JC, Robertson CS. Hyperglycemia
increases brain injury caused by secondary ischemia
after cortical impact injury in rats. Crit Care Med
1997;25:1378—83.
142. Paul T, Bertram H, Bokenkamp R, Hausdorf G. Supraven-
tricular tachycardia in infants, children and adolescents:
diagnosis, and pharmacological and interventional therapy.
Paediatr Drugs 2000;2:171—81.
143. Losek JD, Endom E, Dietrich A, Stewart G, Zempsky W,
Smith K. Adenosine and pediatric supraventricular tachy-
cardia in the emergency department: multicenter study
and review. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:185—91.
144. Roberts JR, Greenburg MI, Knaub M, Baskin SI. Compari-
son of the pharmacological effects of epinephrine admin-
istered by the intravenous and endotracheal routes. JACEP
1978;7:260—4.
145. Zaritsky A. Pediatric resuscitation pharmacology. Members
of the Medications in Pediatric Resuscitation Panel. Ann
Emerg Med 1993;22(pt 2):445—55.
146. Manisterski Y, Vaknin Z, Ben-Abraham R, et al. Endotra-
cheal epinephrine: a call for larger doses. Anesth Analg
2002;95:1037—41 [table of contents].
147. Patterson MD, Boenning DA, Klein BL, et al. The use of
high-dose epinephrine for patients with out-of-hospital
cardiopulmonary arrest refractory to prehospital interven-
tions. Pediatr Emerg Care 2005;21:227—37.
S128
148. Perondi MB, Reis AG, Paiva EF, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA. A
comparison of high-dose and standard-dose epinephrine
in children with cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2004;350:
1722—30.
149. Carpenter TC, Stenmark KR. High-dose epinephrine
is not superior to standard-dose epinephrine in pedi-
atric in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Pediatrics
1997;99:403—8.
150. Dieckmann R, Vardis R. High-dose epinephrine in pedi-
atric out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Pediatrics
1995;95:901—13.
151. Berg RA, Otto CW, Kern KB, et al. High-dose epinephrine
results in greater early mortality after resuscitation from
prolonged cardiac arrest in pigs: a prospective, randomized
study. Crit Care Med 1994;22:282—90.
152. Rubertsson S, Wiklund L. Hemodynamic effects of
epinephrine in combination with different alkaline buffers
during experimental, open-chest, cardiopulmonary resus-
citation. Crit Care Med 1993;21:1051—7.
153. Somberg JC, Timar S, Bailin SJ, et al. Lack of a hypoten-
sive effect with rapid administration of a new aque-
ous formulation of intravenous amiodarone. Am J Cardiol
2004;93:576—81.
154. Yap S-C, Hoomtje T, Sreeram N. Polymorphic ventricu-
lar tachycardia after use of intravenous amiodarone for
postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia. Int J Cardiol
2000;76:245—7.
155. Dauchot P, Gravenstein JS. Effects of atropine on the elec-
trocardiogram in different age groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther
1971;12:274—80.
156. Stulz PM, Scheidegger D, Drop LJ, Lowenstein E, Laver MB.
Ventricular pump performance during hypocalcemia: clin-
ical and experimental studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1979;78:185—94.
157. van Walraven C, Stiell IG, Wells GA, Hebert PC, Van-
demheen K, The OTAC Study Group. Do advanced cardiac
life support drugs increase resuscitation rates from in-
hospital cardiac arrest? Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:544—53.
158. Paraskos JA. Cardiovascular pharmacology III: atropine,
calcium, calcium blockers, and (beta)-blockers. Circulation
1986;74:IV-86—9.
159. Stueven HA, Thompson B, Aprahamian C, Tonsfeldt DJ,
Kastenson EH. The effectiveness of calcium chloride in
refractory electromechanical dissociation. Ann Emerg Med
1985;14:626—9.
160. Stueven HA, Thompson B, Aprahamian C, Tonsfeldt DJ, Kas-
tenson EH. Lack of effectiveness of calcium chloride in
refractory asystole. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:630—2.
161. Srinivasan V, Spinella PC, Drott HR, Roth CL, Helfaer MA,
Nadkarni V. Association of timing, duration, and intensity
of hyperglycemia with intensive care unit mortality in crit-
ically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004;5:329—36.
162. Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management pro-
tocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients. Mayo
Clin Proc 2004;79:992—1000.
163. Losek JD. Hypoglycemia and the ABC’S (sugar) of pediatric
resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 2000;35:43—6.
164. Finney SJ, Zekveld C, Elia A, Evans TW. Glucose control and
mortality in critically ill patients. Jama 2003;290:2041—7.
165. Allegra J, Lavery R, Cody R, et al. Magnesium sulfate in
the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation in the
prehospital setting. Resuscitation 2001;49:245—9.
166. Tzivoni D, Banai S, Schuger C, et al. Treatment of
torsade de pointes with magnesium sulfate. Circulation
1988;77:392—7.
167. Lokesh L, Kumar P, Murki S, Narang A. A random-
ized controlled trial of sodium bicarbonate in neonatal
D. Biarent et al.
resuscitation-effect on immediate outcome. Resuscitation
2004;60:219—23.
168. Bar-Joseph G, Abramson NS, Kelsey SF, Mashiach T, Craig
MT, Safar P. Improved resuscitation outcome in emergency
medical systems with increased usage of sodium bicarbon-
ate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acta Anaesthe-
siol Scand 2005;49:6—15.
169. Dorian P, Cass D, Schwartz B, Cooper R, Gelaznikas
R, Barr A. Amiodarone as compared with lidocaine for
shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med
2002;346:884—90.
170. Walsh EP, Saul JP, Sholler GF, et al. Evaluation of a staged
treatment protocol for rapid automatic junctional tachy-
cardia after operation for congenital heart disease. J Am
Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1046—53.
171. Wang L. Congenital long QT syndrome: 50 years of electro-
physiological research from cell to bedside. Acta Cardio-
logica 2003;58:133—8.
172. Singh BN, Kehoe R, Woosley RL, Scheinman M, Quart
B, Sotalol Multicenter Study Group. Multicenter trial of
sotalol compared with procainamide in the suppression of
inducible ventricular tachycardia: a double-blind, random-
ized parallel evaluation. Am Heart J 1995;129:87—97.
173. Luedtke SA, Kuhn RJ, McCaffrey FM. Pharmacologic man-
agement of supraventricular tachycardias in children, part
2: atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, and junctional and atrial
ectopic tachycardia. Ann Pharmacother 1997;31:1347—59.
174. Luedtke SA, Kuhn RJ, McCaffrey FM. Pharmacologic man-
agement of supraventricular tachycardias in children. Part
1: Wolff-Parkinson-White and atrioventricular nodal reen-
try. Ann Pharmacother 1997;31:1227—43.
175. Mandapati R, Byrum CJ, Kavey RE, et al. Procainamide for
rate control of postsurgical junctional tachycardia. Pediatr
Cardiol 2000;21:123—8.
176. Wang JN, Wu JM, Tsai YC, Lin CS. Ectopic atrial tachycardia
in children. J Formos Med Assoc 2000;99:766—70.
177. Holmes CL, Landry DW, Granton JT. Science review: Vaso-
pressin and the cardiovascular system part 1—–receptor
physiology. Crit Care 2003;7:427—34.
178. Voelckel WG, Lurie KG, McKnite S, et al. Effects of
epinephrine and vasopressin in a piglet model of prolonged
ventricular fibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Crit Care Med 2002;30:957—62.
179. Voelckel WG, Lurie KG, McKnite S, et al. Comparison of
epinephrine and vasopressin in a pediatric porcine model
of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2000;28:3777—
83.
180. Mann K, Berg RA, Nadkarni V. Beneficial effects of vaso-
pressin in prolonged pediatric cardiac arrest: a case series.
Resuscitation 2002;52:149—56.
181. Atkins DL, Kerber RE. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow
is improved by using ‘‘adult’’ electrode paddles. Pediatrics
1994;94:90—3.
182. Atkins DL, Sirna S, Kieso R, Charbonnier F, Kerber RE. Pedi-
atric defibrillation: importance of paddle size in deter-
mining transthoracic impedance. Pediatrics 1988;82:914—
8.
183. Bennetts SH, Deakin CD, Petley GW, Clewlow F. Is optimal
paddle force applied during paediatric external defibrilla-
tion? Resuscitation 2004;60:29—32.
184. Deakin C, Bennetts S, Petley G, Clewlow F. What is the opti-
mal paddle force for paediatric defibrillation? Resuscitation
2002;55:59.
185. Atkins DL, Hartley LL, York DK. Accurate recognition and
effective treatment of ventricular fibrillation by auto-
mated external defibrillators in adolescents. Pediatrics
1998;101(pt 1):393—7.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
186. Pierpont GL, Kruse JA, Nelson DH. Intra-arterial monitoring
during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cathet Cardiovasc
Diagn 1985;11:513—20.
187. Zaritsky A, Nadkarni V, Getson P, Kuehl K. CPR in children.
Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:1107—11.
188. Mogayzel C, Quan L, Graves JR, Tiedeman D, Fahrenbruch
C, Herndon P. Out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in chil-
dren and adolescents: causes and outcomes. Ann Emerg
Med 1995;25:484—91.
189. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist KA,
Holmberg S. Characteristics and outcome among children
suffering from out of hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden.
Resuscitation 2005;64:37—40.
190. Berg RA. Role of mouth-to-mouth rescue breathing in
bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation for asphyxial car-
diac arrest. Crit Care Med 2000;28(Suppl.):N193—5.
191. Appleton GO, Cummins RO, Larson MP, Graves JR. CPR
and the single rescuer: at what age should you ‘‘call
first’’ rather than ‘‘call fast’’? Ann Emerg Med 1995;25:
492—4.
192. Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS, Cummins RO, Hallstrom AP.
Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a
graphic model. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:1652—8.
193. Cobb LA, Fahrenbruch CE, Walsh TR, et al. Influence
of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in
patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. JAMA
1999;281:1182—8.
194. Wik L, Hansen TB, Fylling F, et al. Delaying defibrillation to
give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with
out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial.
JAMA 2003;289:1389—95.
195. Jacobs IG, Finn JC, Oxer HF, Jelinek GA. CPR before defibril-
lation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial.
Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:39—45.
196. Somberg JC, Bailin SJ, Haffajee CI, et al. Intravenous lido-
caine versus intravenous amiodarone (in a new aqueous
formulation) for incessant ventricular tachycardia. Am J
Cardiol 2002;90:853—9.
197. Kudenchuk PJ, Cobb LA, Copass MK, et al. Amiodarone
for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due
to ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1999;341:871—
8.
198. Perry JC, Fenrich AL, Hulse JE, Triedman JK, Friedman RA,
Lamberti JJ. Pediatric use of intravenous amiodarone: effi-
cacy and safety in critically ill patients from a multicenter
protocol. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1246—50.
199. Cummins RO, Graves JR, Larsen MP, et al. Out-of-hospital
transcutaneous pacing by emergency medical technicians
in patients with asystolic cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med
1993;328:1377—82.
200. Sreeram N, Wren C. Supraventricular tachycardia in
infants: response to initial treatment. Arch Dis Child
1990;65:127—9.
201. Bianconi L, Castro AMD, Dinelli M, et al. Comparison of
intravenously administered dofetilide versus amiodarone
in the acute termination of atrial fibrillation and flut-
ter. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:1265—73.
202. Burri S, Hug MI, Bauersfeld U. Efficacy and safety of intra-
venous amiodarone for incessant tachycardias in infants.
Eur J Pediatr 2003;162:880—4.
203. Celiker A, Ceviz N, Ozme S. Effectiveness and safety of
intravenous amiodarone in drug-resistant tachyarrhythmias
of children. Acta Paediatrica Japonica 1998;40:567—72.
204. Dodge-Khatami A, Miller O, Anderson R, Gil-Jaurena J,
Goldman A, de Leval M. Impact of junctional ectopic
tachycardia on postoperative morbidity following repair
S129
of congenital heart defects. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg
2002;21:255—9.
205. Figa FH, Gow RM, Hamilton RM, Freedom RM. Clinical effi-
cacy and safety of intravenous Amiodarone in infants and
children. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:573—7.
206. Hoffman TM, Bush DM, Wernovsky G, et al. Postopera-
tive junctional ectopic tachycardia in children: incidence,
risk factors, and treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:
1607—11.
207. Soult JA, Munoz M, Lopez JD, Romero A, Santos J, Tovaruela
A. Efficacy and safety of intravenous amiodarone for short-
term treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycar-
dia in children. Pediatr Cardiol 1995;16:16—9.
208. Benson Jr D, Smith W, Dunnigan A, Sterba R, Gallagher J.
Mechanisms of regular wide QRS tachycardia in infants and
children. Am J Cardiol 1982;49:1778—88.
209. Drago F, Mazza A, Guccione P, Mafrici A, Di Liso G, Ragonese
P. Amiodarone used alone or in combination with propra-
nolol: a very effective therapy for tachyarrhythmias in
infants and children. Pediatr Cardiol 1998;19:445—9.
210. Benson DJ, Dunnigan A, Green T, Benditt D, Schneider S.
Periodic procainamide for paroxysmal tachycardia. Circu-
lation 1985;72:147—52.
211. Komatsu C, Ishinaga T, Tateishi O, Tokuhisa Y, Yoshimura
S. Effects of four antiarrhythmic drugs on the induction
and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycar-
dia. Jpn Circ J 1986;50:961—72.
212. Mandel WJ, Laks MM, Obayashi K, Hayakawa H, Daley
W. The Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: pharmacologic
effects of procaine amide. Am Heart J 1975;90:744—54.
213. Meldon SW, Brady WJ, Berger S, Mannenbach M. Pediatric
ventricular tachycardia: a review with three illustrative
cases. Pediatr Emerg Care 1994;10:294—300.
214. Shih JY, Gillette PC, Kugler JD, et al. The electrophysiologic
effects of procainamide in the immature heart. Pediatr
Pharmacol (New York) 1982;2:65—73.
215. Hildebrand CA, Hartmann AG, Arcinue EL, Gomez RJ, Bing
RJ. Cardiac performance in pediatric near-drowning. Crit
Care Med 1988;16:331—5.
216. Checchia PA, Sehra R, Moynihan J, Daher N, Tang W, Weil
MH. Myocardial injury in children following resuscitation
after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2003;57:131—7.
217. Hickey RW, Ferimer H, Alexander HL, et al. Delayed,
spontaneous hypothermia reduces neuronal damage
after asphyxial cardiac arrest in rats. Crit Care Med
2000;28:3511—6.
218. Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Aroup. Mild ther-
apeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome
after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2002;346:549—56.
219. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of
comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with
induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:557—63.
220. Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, et al. Selective
head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neona-
tal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet
2005;365:663—70.
221. Battin MR, Penrice J, Gunn TR, Gunn AJ. Treatment of
term infants with head cooling and mild systemic hypother-
mia (35.0 degrees C and 34.5 degrees C) after perinatal
asphyxia. Pediatrics 2003;111:244—51.
222. Compagnoni G, Pogliani L, Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana
P, Mosca F. Hypothermia reduces neurological damage
in asphyxiated newborn infants. Biol Neonate 2002;82:
222—7.
223. Gunn AJ, Gluckman PD, Gunn TR. Selective head cooling
in newborn infants after perinatal asphyxia: a safety study.
Pediatrics 1998;102:885—92.
S130
224. Debillon T, Daoud P, Durand P, et al. Whole-body cooling
after perinatal asphyxia: a pilot study in term neonates.
Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:17—23.
225. Hachimi-Idrissi S, Corne L, Ebinger G, Michotte Y, Huyghens
L. Mild hypothermia induced by a helmet device: a clinical
feasibility study. Resuscitation 2001;51:275—81.
226. Bernard S, Buist M, Monteiro O, Smith K. Induced hypother-
mia using large volume, ice-cold intravenous fluid in
comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a pre-
liminary report. Resuscitation 2003;56:9—13.
227. Kliegel A, Losert H, Sterz F, et al. Cold simple intravenous
infusions preceding special endovascular cooling for faster
induction of mild hypothermia after cardiac arrest—–a fea-
sibility study. Resuscitation 2005;64:347—51.
228. Polderman KH, Peerdeman SM, Girbes AR. Hypophos-
phatemia and hypomagnesemia induced by cooling
in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg
2001;94:697—705.
229. Polderman KH. Application of therapeutic hypothermia in
the intensive care unit. Opportunities and pitfalls of a
promising treatment modality—–Part 2. Practical aspects
and side effects. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:757—69.
230. Zeiner A, Holzer M, Sterz F, et al. Hyperthermia after car-
diac arrest is associated with an unfavorable neurologic
outcome. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2007—12.
231. Takino M, Okada Y. Hyperthermia following cardiopul-
monary resuscitation. Intensive Care Med 1991;17:419—20.
232. Takasu A, Saitoh D, Kaneko N, Sakamoto T, Okada Y. Hyper-
thermia: is it an ominous sign after cardiac arrest? Resus-
citation 2001;49:273—7.
233. Coimbra C, Boris-Moller F, Drake M, Wieloch T. Diminished
neuronal damage in the rat brain by late treatment with
the antipyretic drug dipyrone or cooling following cerebral
ischemia. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1996;92:447—53.
234. Coimbra C, Drake M, Boris-Moller F, Wieloch T. Long-lasting
neuroprotective effect of postischemic hypothermia and
treatment with an anti-inflammatory/antipyretic drug: evi-
dence for chronic encephalopathic processes following
ischemia. Stroke 1996;27:1578—85.
235. Gillis J, Dickson D, Rieder M, Steward D, Edmonds J.
Results of inpatient pediatric resuscitation. Crit Care Med
1986;14:469—71.
236. Schindler MB, Bohn D, Cox PN, et al. Outcome of out-of-
hospital cardiac or respiratory arrest in children. N Engl J
Med 1996;335:1473—9.
237. Suominen P, Korpela R, Kuisma M, Silfvast T, Olkkola KT.
Paediatric cardiac arrest and resuscitation provided by
physician-staffed emergency care units. Acta Anaesthesiol
Scand 1997;41:260—5.
238. Lopez-Herce J, Garcia C, Rodriguez-Nunez A, et al. Long-
term outcome of paediatric cardiorespiratory arrest in
Spain. Resuscitation 2005;64:79—85.
239. Lopez-Herce J, Garcia C, Dominguez P, et al. Character-
istics and outcome of cardiorespiratory arrest in children.
Resuscitation 2004;63:311—20.
240. Hazinski MF, Chahine AA, Holcomb III GW, Morris Jr JA. Out-
come of cardiovascular collapse in pediatric blunt trauma.
Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:1229—35.
241. Morris MC, Wernovsky G, Nadkarni VM. Survival outcomes
after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation insti-
tuted during active chest compressions following refractory
in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med
2004;5:440—6.
242. Duncan BW, Ibrahim AE, Hraska V, et al. Use of rapid-
deployment extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the
resuscitation of pediatric patients with heart disease after
cardiac arrest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:305—11.
D. Biarent et al.
243. Parra DA, Totapally BR, Zahn E, et al. Outcome of cardiopul-
monary resuscitation in a pediatric cardiac intensive care
unit. Crit Care Med 2000;28:3296—300.
244. Idris AH, Berg RA, Bierens J, et al. Recommended guidelines
for uniform reporting of data from drowning: the ‘‘Utstein
style’’. Resuscitation 2003;59:45—57.
245. Bauchner H, Waring C, Vinci R. Parental presence during
procedures in an emergency room: results from 50 obser-
vations. Pediatrics 1991;87:544—8.
246. Bauchner H, Vinci R, Waring C. Pediatric procedures: do
parents want to watch? Pediatrics 1989;84:907—9 [com-
ment].
247. Bauchner H, Zuckerman B. Cocaine, sudden infant
death syndrome, and home monitoring. J Pediatr
1990;117:904—6.
248. Haimi-Cohen Y, Amir J, Harel L, Straussberg R, Varsano
Y. Parental presence during lumbar puncture: anxiety
and attitude toward the procedure. Clin Pediatr (Phila)
1996;35:2—4.
249. Sacchetti A, Lichenstein R, Carraccio CA, Harris RH. Family
member presence during pediatric emergency department
procedures. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996;12:268—71.
250. Boie ET, Moore GP, Brummett C, Nelson DR. Do parents
want to be present during invasive procedures performed
on their children in the emergency department? A survey
of 400 parents. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:70—4.
251. Taylor N, Bonilla L, Silver P, Sagy M. Pediatric procedure: do
parents want to be present? Crit Care Med 1996;24:A131.
252. Powers KS, Rubenstein JS. Family presence during invasive
procedures in the pediatric intensive care unit: a prospec-
tive study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:955—8.
253. Cameron JA, Bond MJ, Pointer SC. Reducing the anx-
iety of children undergoing surgery: parental presence
during anaesthetic induction. J Paediatr Child Health
1996;32:51—6.
254. Merritt KA, Sargent JR, Osborn LM. Attitudes regarding
parental presence during medical procedures. Am J Dis
Child 1990;144:270—1.
255. Wolfram RW, Turner ED. Effects of parental presence during
children’s venipuncture. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:58—64.
256. Jarvis AS. Parental presence during resuscitation: attitudes
of staff on a paediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Crit
Care Nurs 1998;14:3—7.
257. Meyers TA, Eichhorn DJ, Guzzetta CE. Do families want to
be present during CPR? A retrospective survey. J Emerg Nurs
1998;24:400—5.
258. Doyle CJ, Post H, Burney RE, Maino J, Keefe M, Rhee KJ.
Family participation during resuscitation: an option. Ann
Emerg Med 1987;16:673—5.
259. Hanson C, Strawser D. Family presence during car-
diopulmonary resuscitation: Foote Hospital emergency
department’s nine-year perspective. J Emerg Nurs
1992;18:104—6.
260. Robinson SM, Mackenzie-Ross S, Campbell Hewson GL, Egle-
ston CV, Prevost AT. Psychological effect of witnessed resus-
citation on bereaved relatives. Lancet 1998;352:614—7.
261. Meyers TA, Eichhorn DJ, Guzzetta CE, et al. Family pres-
ence during invasive procedures and resuscitation. Am J
Nurs 2000;100:32—42 [quiz 3].
262. Beckman AW, Sloan BK, Moore GP, et al. Should parents
be present during emergency department procedures on
children, and who should make that decision? A survey of
emergency physician and nurse attitudes. Acad Emerg Med
2002;9:154—8.
263. Eppich WJ, Arnold LD. Family member presence in
the pediatric emergency department. Curr Opin Pediatr
2003;15:294—8.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
264. Eichhorn DJ, Meyers TA, Mitchell TG, Guzzetta CE. Opening
the doors: family presence during resuscitation. J Cardio-
vasc Nurs 1996;10:59—70.
265. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Part
7. Neonatal Life Support. 2005 International Consensus
on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardio-
vascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
Resuscitation 2005;67:293—303.
266. Resuscitation Council (UK). Resuscitation at birth. Newborn
life support course provider manual. London, Resuscitation
Council (UK); 2001.
267. Niermeyer S, Kattwinkel J, Van Reempts P, et al. Interna-
tional Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: an excerpt
from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resus-
citation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: Interna-
tional Consensus on Science. Contributors and Review-
ers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines. Pediatrics
E2000;106:29.
268. Palme-Kilander C. Methods of resuscitation in low-Apgar-
score newborn infants—–a national survey. Acta Paediatr
1992;81:739—44.
269. British Paediatric Association Working Party. Neonatal
Resuscitation. London: British Paediatric Association; 1993.
270. Dahm LS, James LS. Newborn temperature and calculated
heat loss in the delivery room. Pediatrics 1972;49:504—13.
271. Stephenson J, Du J, Tk O. The effect if cooling on blood gas
tensions in newborn infants. J Pediatr 1970;76:848—52.
272. Gandy GM, Adamsons Jr K, Cunningham N, Silverman WA,
James LS. Thermal environment and acid—base homeosta-
sis in human infants during the first few hours of life. J Clin
Invest 1964;43:751—8.
273. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the
newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg 1953:32.
274. Anonymous. Is the Apgar score outmoded? Lancet
1989;i:591—2.
275. Chamberlain G, Banks J. Assessment of the Apgar score.
Lancet 1974;2:1225—8.
276. Owen CJ, Wyllie JP. Determination of heart rate in the baby
at birth. Resuscitation 2004;60:213—7.
277. Cordero Jr L, Hon EH. Neonatal bradycardia following
nasopharyngeal stimulation. J Pediatr 1971;78:441—7.
278. Thaler MM, Stobie GH. An improved technique of external
caridac compression in infants and young children. N Engl
J Med 1963;269:606—10.
279. Todres ID, Rogers MC. Methods of external cardiac massage
in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1975;86:781—2.
280. Dean JM, Koehler RC, Schleien CL, et al. Improved blood
flow during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation with
30% duty cycle in infant pigs. Circulation 1991;84:896—904.
281. Whyte SD, Sinha AK, Wyllie JP. Neonatal resuscitation: a
practical assessment. Resuscitation 1999;40:21—5.
282. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson AT, Marlow N, Wilkinson
AR. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospi-
tal for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics
2000;106:659—71.
283. Vohra S, Frent G, Campbell V, Abbott M, Whyte R. Effect of
polyethylene occlusive skin wrapping on heat loss in very
low birth weight infants at delivery: a randomized trial. J
Pediatr 1999;134:547—51.
284. Lenclen R, Mazraani M, Jugie M, et al. Use of a polyethy-
lene bag: a way to improve the thermal environment of
the premature newborn at the delivery room. Arch Pediatr
2002;9:238—44.
285. Bjorklund LJ, Hellstrom-Westas L. Reducing heat loss at
birth in very preterm infants. J Pediatr 2000;137:739—40.
286. Vohra S, Roberts RS, Zhang B, Janes M, Schmidt B. Heat
loss prevention (HeLP) in the delivery room: a randomized
S131
controlled trial of polyethylene occlusive skin wrapping in
very preterm infants. J Pediatr 2004;145:750—3.
287. Lieberman E, Eichenwald E, Mathur G, Richardson D,
Heffner L, Cohen A. Intrapartum fever and unexplained
seizures in term infants. Pediatrics 2000;106:983—8.
288. Grether JK, Nelson KB. Maternal infection and cere-
bral palsy in infants of normal birth weight. JAMA
1997;278:207—11.
289. Dietrich WD, Alonso O, Halley M, Busto R. Delayed posttrau-
matic brain hyperthermia worsens outcome after fluid per-
cussion brain injury: a light and electron microscopic study
in rats. Neurosurgery 1996;38:533—41 [discussion 41].
290. Wiswell TE, Gannon CM, Jacob J, et al. Delivery room
management of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained
neonate: results of the multicenter, international collabo-
rative trial. Pediatrics 2000;105:1—7.
291. Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, Wiswell TE, Aguilar AM,
Vivas NI. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of
meconium-stained neonates before delivery of their shoul-
ders: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet
2004;364:597—602.
292. Solas AB, Kutzsche S, Vinje M, Saugstad OD. Cerebral
hypoxemia-ischemia and reoxygenation with 21% or 100%
oxygen in newborn piglets: effects on extracellular levels
of excitatory amino acids and microcirculation. Pediatr Crit
Care Med 2001;2:340—5.
293. Solas AB, Kalous P, Saugstad OD. Reoxygenation
with 100 or 21% oxygen after cerebral hypoxemia-
ischemia-hypercapnia in newborn piglets. Biol Neonate
2004;85:105—11.
294. Solas AB, Munkeby BH, Saugstad OD. Comparison of
short- and long-duration oxygen treatment after cerebral
asphyxia in newborn piglets. Pediatr Res 2004;56:125—
31.
295. Huang CC, Yonetani M, Lajevardi N, Delivoria-Papadopoulos
M, Wilson DF, Pastuszko A. Comparison of postasphyxial
resuscitation with 100% and 21% oxygen on cortical oxy-
gen pressure and striatal dopamine metabolism in newborn
piglets. J Neurochem 1995;64:292—8.
296. Kutzsche S, Ilves P, Kirkeby OJ, Saugstad OD. Hydrogen per-
oxide production in leukocytes during cerebral hypoxia and
reoxygenation with 100% or 21% oxygen in newborn piglets.
Pediatr Res 2001;49:834—42.
297. Lundstrom KE, Pryds O, Greisen G. Oxygen at birth and pro-
longed cerebral vasoconstriction in preterm infants. Arch
Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995;73:F81—6.
298. Davis PG, Tan A, O’Donnell CP, Schulze A. Resuscitation
of newborn infants with 100% oxygen or air: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2004;364:1329—33.
299. Harris AP, Sendak MJ, Donham RT. Changes in arterial
oxygen saturation immediately after birth in the human
neonate. J Pediatr 1986;109:117—9.
300. Reddy VK, Holzman IR, Wedgwood JF. Pulse oximetry sat-
urations in the first 6 hours of life in normal term infants.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1999;38:87—92.
301. Toth B, Becker A, Seelbach-Gobel B. Oxygen saturation in
healthy newborn infants immediately after birth measured
by pulse oximetry. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002;266:105—
7.
302. Karlberg P, Koch G. Respiratory studies in newborn infants.
III. Development of mechanics of breathing during the
first week of life. A longitudinal study Acta Paediatr
1962;(Suppl. 135):121—9.
303. Vyas H, Milner AD, Hopkins IE. Intrathoracic pressure and
volume changes during the spontaneous onset of respira-
tion in babies born by cesarean section and by vaginal
delivery. J Pediatr 1981;99:787—91.
S132
304. Mortola JP, Fisher JT, Smith JB, Fox GS, Weeks S, Willis
D. Onset of respiration in infants delivered by cesarean
section. J Appl Physiol 1982;52:716—24.
305. Hull D. Lung expansion and ventilation during resuscitation
of asphyxiated newborn infants. J Pediatr 1969;75:47—58.
306. Upton CJ, Milner AD. Endotracheal resuscitation of
neonates using a rebreathing bag. Arch Dis Child
1991;66:39—42.
307. Vyas H, Milner AD, Hopkin IE, Boon AW. Physiologic
responses to prolonged and slow-rise inflation in the resus-
citation of the asphyxiated newborn infant. J Pediatr
1981;99:635—9.
308. Vyas H, Field D, Milner AD, Hopkin IE. Determinants of the
first inspiratory volume and functional residual capacity at
birth. Pediatr Pulmonol 1986;2:189—93.
309. Boon AW, Milner AD, Hopkin IE. Lung expansion, tidal
exchange, and formation of the functional residual capac-
ity during resuscitation of asphyxiated neonates. J Pediatr
1979;95:1031—6.
310. Ingimarsson J, Bjorklund LJ, Curstedt T, et al. Incomplete
protection by prophylactic surfactant against the adverse
effects of large lung inflations at birth in immature lambs.
Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1446—53.
311. Nilsson R, Grossmann G, Robertson B. Bronchiolar epithelial
lesions induced in the premature rabbit neonate by short
periods of artificial ventilation. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand
[A] 1980;88:359—67.
312. Probyn ME, Hooper SB, Dargaville PA, et al. Positive
end expiratory pressure during resuscitation of prema-
ture lambs rapidly improves blood gases without adversely
affecting arterial pressure. Pediatr Res 2004;56:198—
204.
313. Hird MF, Greenough A, Gamsu HR. Inflating pressures for
effective resuscitation of preterm infants. Early Hum Dev
1991;26:69—72.
314. Lindner W, Vossbeck S, Hummler H, Pohlandt F. Deliv-
ery room management of extremely low birth weight
infants: spontaneous breathing or intubation? Pediatrics
1999;103:961—7.
315. Allwood AC, Madar RJ, Baumer JH, Readdy L, Wright D.
Changes in resuscitation practice at birth. Arch Dis Child
Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F375—9.
316. Cole AF, Rolbin SH, Hew EM, Pynn S. An improved ventila-
tor system for delivery-room management of the newborn.
Anesthesiology 1979;51:356—8.
317. Hoskyns EW, Milner AD, Hopkin IE. A simple method of face
mask resuscitation at birth. Arch Dis Child 1987;62:376—8.
318. Ganga-Zandzou PS, Diependaele JF, Storme L, et al. Is Ambu
ventilation of newborn infants a simple question of finger-
touch? Arch Pediatr 1996;3:1270—2.
319. Finer NN, Rich W, Craft A, Henderson C. Comparison of
methods of bag and mask ventilation for neonatal resusci-
tation. Resuscitation 2001;49:299—305.
320. Kanter RK. Evaluation of mask-bag ventilation in resuscita-
tion of infants. Am J Dis Child 1987;141:761—3.
321. Esmail N, Saleh M, et al. Laryngeal mask airway ver-
sus endotracheal intubation for Apgar score improve-
ment in neonatal resuscitation. Egypt J Anesthesiol
2002;18:115—21.
322. Gandini D, Brimacombe JR. Neonatal resuscitation with
the laryngeal mask airway in normal and low birth weight
infants. Anesth Analg 1999;89:642—3.
323. Brimacombe J, Gandini D. Airway rescue and drug delivery
in an 800 g neonate with the laryngeal mask airway. Paedi-
atr Anaesth 1999;9:178.
324. Lonnqvist PA. Successful use of laryngeal mask airway in
low-weight expremature infants with bronchopulmonary
D. Biarent et al.
dysplasia undergoing cryotherapy for retinopathy of the
premature. Anesthesiology 1995;83:422—4.
325. Paterson SJ, Byrne PJ, Molesky MG, Seal RF, Finucane BT.
Neonatal resuscitation using the laryngeal mask airway.
Anesthesiology 1994;80:1248—53.
326. Trevisanuto D, Ferrarese P, Zanardo V, Chiandetti L. Laryn-
geal mask airway in neonatal resuscitation: a survey of
current practice and perceived role by anaesthesiologists
and paediatricians. Resuscitation 2004;60:291—6.
327. Hansen TG, Joensen H, Henneberg SW, Hole P. Laryn-
geal mask airway guided tracheal intubation in a neonate
with the Pierre Robin syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
1995;39:129—31.
328. Osses H, Poblete M, Asenjo F. Laryngeal mask for diffi-
cult intubation in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1999;9:399—
401.
329. Stocks RM, Egerman R, Thompson JW, Peery M. Airway
management of the severely retrognathic child: use of the
laryngeal mask airway. Ear Nose Throat J 2002;81:223—6.
330. Palme-Kilander C, Tunell R, Chiwei Y. Pulmonary gas
exchange immediately after birth in spontaneously breath-
ing infants. Arch Dis Child 1993;68:6—10.
331. Aziz HF, Martin JB, Moore JJ. The pediatric disposable end-
tidal carbon dioxide detector role in endotracheal intuba-
tion in newborns. J Perinatol 1999;19:110—3.
332. Bhende MS, LaCovey D. A note of caution about the continu-
ous use of colorimetric end-tidal CO2 detectors in children.
Pediatrics 1995;95:800—1.
333. Repetto JE, Donohue P-CP, Baker SF, Kelly L, Nogee LM.
Use of capnography in the delivery room for assessment of
endotracheal tube placement. J Perinatol 2001;21:284—7.
334. Roberts WA, Maniscalco WM, Cohen AR, Litman RS,
Chhibber A. The use of capnography for recognition of
esophageal intubation in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Pediatr Pulmonol 1995;19:262—8.
335. Berg RA, Otto CW, Kern KB, et al. A randomized,
blinded trial of high-dose epinephrine versus standard-dose
epinephrine in a swine model of pediatric asphyxial cardiac
arrest. Crit Care Med 1996;24:1695—700.
336. Burchfield DJ, Preziosi MP, Lucas VW, Fan J. Effects of
graded doses of epinephrine during asphxia-induced brady-
cardia in newborn lambs. Resuscitation 1993;25:235—44.
337. Ralston SH, Voorhees WD, Babbs CF. Intrapulmonary
epinephrine during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion: improved regional blood flow and resuscitation in
dogs. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13:79—86.
338. Ralston SH, Tacker WA, Showen L, Carter A, Babbs CF.
Endotracheal versus intravenous epinephrine during elec-
tromechanical dissociation with CPR in dogs. Ann Emerg
Med 1985;14:1044—8.
339. Redding JS, Asuncion JS, Pearson JW. Effective routes of
drug administration during cardiac arrest. Anesth Analg
1967;46:253—8.
340. Schwab KO, von Stockhausen HB. Plasma catecholamines
after endotracheal administration of adrenaline during
postnatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
1994;70:F213—7.
341. Brambrink AM, Ichord RN, Martin LJ, Koehler RC, Trayst-
man RJ. Poor outcome after hypoxia-ischemia in newborns
is associated with physiological abnormalities during early
recovery. Possible relevance to secondary brain injury after
head trauma in infants. Exp Toxicol Pathol 1999;51:151—62.
342. Vannucci RC, Vannucci SJ. Cerebral carbohydrate
metabolism during hypoglycemia and anoxia in newborn
rats. Ann Neurol 1978;4:73—9.
343. Yager JY, Heitjan DF, Towfighi J, Vannucci RC. Effect
of insulin-induced and fasting hypoglycemia on peri-
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
natal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Pediatr Res
1992;31:138—42.
344. Salhab WA, Wyckoff MH, Laptook AR, Perlman JM. Initial
hypoglycemia and neonatal brain injury in term infants with
severe fetal acidemia. Pediatrics 2004;114:361—6.
345. Kent TA, Soukup VM, Fabian RH. Heterogeneity affecting
outcome from acute stroke therapy: making reperfusion
worse. Stroke 2001;32:2318—27.
346. Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, et al. Moderate
hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: efficacy out-
comes. Pediatr Neurol 2005;32:11—7.
347. Thoresen M, Whitelaw A. Cardiovascular changes dur-
ing mild therapeutic hypothermia and rewarming in
infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics
2000;106:92—9.
348. Shankaran S, Laptook A, Wright LL, et al. Whole-body
hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy: animal obser-
vations as a basis for a randomized, controlled pilot study
in term infants. Pediatrics 2002;110:377—85.
349. De Leeuw R, Cuttini M, Nadai M, et al. Treatment choices
for extremely preterm infants: an international perspec-
tive. J Pediatr 2000;137:608—16.
S133
350. Lee SK, Penner PL, Cox M. Comparison of the attitudes
of health care professionals and parents toward active
treatment of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics
1991;88:110—4.
351. Kopelman LM, Irons TG, Kopelman AE. Neonatologists
judge the ‘‘Baby Doe’’ regulations. N Engl J Med
1988;318:677—83.
352. Sanders MR, Donohue PK, Oberdorf MA, Rosenkrantz TS,
Allen MC. Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatolo-
gists’ attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J Peri-
natol 1995;15:494—502.
353. Draper ES, Manktelow B, Field DJ, James D. Tables for
predicting survival for preterm births are updated. BMJ
2003;327:872.
354. Jain L, Ferre C, Vidyasagar D, Nath S, Sheftel D. Car-
diopulmonary resuscitation of apparently stillborn infants:
survival and long-term outcome. J Pediatr 1991;118:778—
82.
355. Haddad B, Mercer BM, Livingston JC, Talati A, Sibai BM.
Outcome after successful resuscitation of babies born with
apgar scores of 0 at both 1 and 5 minutes. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2000;182:1210—4.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S135—S170
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 7. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances
Jasmeet Soar, Charles D. Deakin, Jerry P. Nolan, Gamal Abbas,
Annette Alfonzo, Anthony J. Handley, David Lockey,
Gavin D. Perkins, Karl Thies
7a. Life-threatening electrolyte
disorders
Overview
Electrolyte abnormalities can cause cardiac
arrhythmias or cardiopulmonary arrest. Life-
threatening arrhythmias are associated commonly
with potassium disorders, particularly hyper-
kalaemia, and less commonly with disorders of
serum calcium and magnesium. In some cases
therapy for life-threatening electrolyte disorders
should start before the laboratory results become
available.
The electrolyte values for definitions have been
chosen as a guide to clinical decision-making.
The precise values that trigger treatment deci-
sions will depend on the patient’s clinical con-
dition and the rate of change of the electrolyte
values.
There is little or no evidence base for the treat-
ment of electrolyte abnormalities during cardiac
arrest. Guidance during cardiac arrest is based
on the strategies used in the non-arrest patient.
There are no major changes in the treatment of
these disorders since the International Guidelines
2000.1
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.004
Prevention of electrolyte disorders
• Treat life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities
before cardiac arrest occurs.
• After initial treatment, remove any precipitating
factors (e.g., drugs) and monitor electrolyte lev-
els to prevent recurrence of the abnormality.
• Monitor renal function in patients at risk of elec-
trolyte disorders.
• In haemodialysis patients, review the dialy-
sis prescription regularly to avoid inappropriate
electrolyte shifts during treatment.
Potassium disorders
Potassium homeostasis
Extracellular potassium concentration is regulated
tightly between 3.5—5.0 mmol l−1 . A large con-
centration gradient normally exists between the
intracellular and extracellular fluid compartments.
This potassium gradient across the cell membranes
contributes to the excitability of nerve and mus-
cle cells, including the myocardium. Evaluation
of serum potassium must take into consideration
the effects of changes in serum pH. When serum
pH decreases, serum potassium increases because
S136
potassium shifts from the cellular to the vascular
space. When serum pH increases, serum potassium
decreases because potassium shifts intracellularly.
We therefore anticipate the effects of pH changes
on serum potassium during the therapy for hyper-
kalaemia or hypokalaemia.
Hyperkalaemia
This is the most common electrolyte disorder asso-
ciated with cardiopulmonary arrest. It is usually
caused by increased potassium release from the
cells or impaired excretion by the kidneys.
Definition. There is no universal definition,
although we have defined hyperkalaemia as a serum
potassium concentration higher than 5.5 mmol l−1 ;
in practice, hyperkalaemia is a continuum. As
the potassium concentration increases above this
value, the risk of adverse events increases and the
need for urgent treatment increases. Severe hyper-
kalaemia has been defined as a serum potassium
concentration higher than 6.5 mmol l−1 .
Causes. There are several potential causes of
hyperkalaemia, including renal failure, drugs
(angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI),
angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), potassium-
sparing diuretics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAIDs), beta-blockers, trimethoprim, tis-
sue breakdown (rhabdomyolysis, tumour lysis,
haemolysis), metabolic acidosis, endocrine disor-
ders (Addison’s disease), hyperkalaemic periodic
paralysis, or diet, which may be the sole cause
in patients with established renal failure. Abnor-
mal erythrocytes or thrombocytosis may cause a
spuriously high potassium concentration. The risk
of hyperkalaemia is even greater when there is
a combination of factors, such as the concomi-
tant use of ACEI and NSAIDs or potassium-sparing
diuretics.
Recognition of hyperkalaemia. Exclude hyper-
kalaemia in patients with an arrhythmia or car-
diac arrest.2 Patients may present with weakness
progressing to flaccid paralysis, paraesthesia or
depressed deep tendon reflexes. The first indica-
tor of hyperkalaemia may also be the presence of
ECG abnormalities, arrhythmias, cardiopulmonary
arrest or sudden death. The effect of hyper-
kalaemia on the ECG depends on the absolute serum
potassium as well as the rate of increase. Most
patients will have ECG abnormalities at a serum
potassium concentration higher than 6.7 mmol l−1 .3
The ECG manifestations of hyperkalaemia are usu-
ally progressive and include:
J. Soar et al.
• first-degree heart block (prolonged PR interval)
>0.2 s;
• flattened or absent P waves;
• tall, peaked (tented) T waves, larger than R wave
in more than one lead;
• ST segment depression;
• S and T waves merging;
• widened QRS >0.12 s;
• ventricular tachycardia (VT);
• bradycardia;
• cardiac arrest, i.e., pulseless electrical activity
(PEA), ventricular fibrillation (VF), asystole.
Treatment of hyperkalaemia. The five key steps
in treating hyperkalaemia are:
1. cardiac protection by antagonising the effects of
hyperkalaemia;
2. shifting potassium into cells;
3. removing potassium from the body;
4. monitoring serum potassium for rebound hyper-
kalaemia;
5. prevention of recurrence of hyperkalaemia.
When hyperkalaemia is strongly suspected, e.g.,
in the presence of ECG changes, start life-saving
treatment even before laboratory results are avail-
able. The management of hyperkalaemia is the sub-
ject of a recent Cochrane review.4
Patient not in cardiac arrest. If the patient
is not in cardiac arrest, assess fluid status;
if hypovolaemic, give fluid to enhance urinary
potassium excretion. The values for classification
are an approximate guide. For mild elevation
(5.5—6 mmol l−1 ), remove potassium from the body
with:
• potassium exchange resins, i.e., calcium reso-
nium 15—30 g or sodium polystyrene sulfonate
(Kayexalate® ) 15—30 g in 50—100 ml of 20% sor-
bitol, given either orally or by retention enema
(onset in 1—3 h, maximal effect at 6 h);
• diuretics, i.e., furosemide 1 mg kg−1 IV slowly
(onset with the diuresis);
• dialysis; haemodialysis is more efficient than
peritoneal dialysis at removing potassium (imme-
diate onset, 25—30 mmol potassium h−1 removed
with haemodialysis).
For moderate elevation (6—6.5 mmol l−1 ) with-
out ECG changes, shift potassium into cells with:
• dextrose/insulin: 10 units short-acting insulin
and 50 g glucose IV over 15—30 min (onset in
15—30 min, maximal effect at 30—60 min; mon-
itor blood glucose). Use in addition to removal
strategies above.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
For severe elevation (≥6.5 mmol l−1 ) without
ECG changes, shift potassium into cells with:
• salbutamol, 5 mg nebulised. Several doses may
be required (onset in 15—30 min);
• sodium bicarbonate, 50 mmol IV over 5 min if
metabolic acidosis present (onset in 15—30 min).
Bicarbonate alone is less effective than glucose
plus insulin or nebulised salbutamol; it is best
used in conjunction with these medications;5,6
• use multiple shifting agents in addition to
removal strategies above.
For severe elevation (≥6.5 mmol l−1 ) with toxic
ECG changes, protect the heart first with:
• calcium chloride, i.e., 10 ml 10% calcium chloride
IV over 2—5 min to antagonise the toxic effects of
hyperkalaemia at the myocardial cell membrane.
This protects the heart by reducing the risk of
VF, but does not lower serum potassium (onset in
1—3 min). Use in addition to potassium removal
and shifting strategies stated above.
Patient in cardiac arrest. If the patient is in
cardiac arrest, there are no modifications to BLS
in the presence of electrolyte abnormalities. For
ALS, follow the universal algorithm. The general
approach to treatment depends on the degree of
hyperkalaemia, rate of rise of serum potassium and
the patient’s clinical condition.
In cardiopulmonary arrest, protect the heart
first, then apply shifting and removal strategies
using:
• calcium chloride: 10 ml of 10% calcium chloride
IV by rapid bolus injection to antagonise the toxic
effects of hyperkalaemia at the myocardial cell
membrane;
• sodium bicarbonate: 50 mmol IV by rapid injec-
tion (if severe acidosis or renal failure);
• dextrose/insulin: 10 units short-acting insulin and
50 g glucose IV by rapid injection;
• haemodialysis: consider this for cardiac arrest
induced by hyperkalaemia, which is resistant to
medical treatment.
Indications for dialysis. Haemodialysis is the
most effective method of removal of potassium
from the body. The principal mechanism of action
is the diffusion of potassium ions across the
transmembrane potassium ion gradient. The typ-
ical decline in serum potassium is 1 mmol l−1 in
the first 60 min, followed by 1 mmol l−1 over the
next 2 h. Consider haemodialysis early for hyper-
kalaemia associated with established renal fail-
ure, oliguric acute renal failure (<400 ml day−1
urine output) or when there is marked tissue
S137
breakdown. Dialysis is also indicated when hyper-
kalaemia is resistant to medical management.
Serum potassium frequently rebounds after ini-
tial treatment. In unstable patients, continuous
veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) is less likely
to compromise cardiac output than intermittent
haemodialysis.
Hypokalaemia
Hypokalaemia is common in hospital patients.7
Hypokalaemia increases the incidence of arrhyth-
mias, particularly in patients with pre-existing
heart disease and in those treated with digoxin.
Definition. Hypokalaemia is defined as a serum
potassium <3.5 mmol l−1 . Severe hypokalaemia is
defined as a K+ < 2.5 mmol l−1 and may be associ-
ated with symptoms.
Causes. Causes of hypokalaemia include gas-
trointestinal loss (diarrhoea), drugs (diuretics,
laxatives, steroids), renal losses (renal tubular
disorders, diabetes insipidus, dialysis), endocrine
disorders (Cushing’s syndrome, hyperaldostero-
nism), metabolic alkalosis, magnesium depletion
and poor dietary intake. Treatment strategies used
for hyperkalaemia may also induce hypokalaemia.
Recognition of hypokalaemia. Exclude hypoka-
laemia in every patient with an arrhythmia or
cardiac arrest. In dialysis patients, hypokalaemia
occurs commonly at the end of a haemodialysis
session or during treatment with continuous ambu-
latory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
As serum potassium concentration decreases,
the nerves and muscles are predominantly
affected, causing fatigue, weakness, leg
cramps and constipation. In severe cases
(K+ < 2.5 mmol l−1 ), rhabdomyolysis, ascending
paralysis and respiratory difficulties may occur.
ECG features of hypokalaemia comprise:
• U waves;
• T-wave flattening;
• ST segment changes;
• arrhythmias, especially if patient is taking
digoxin;
• cardiopulmonary arrest (PEA, VF, asystole).
Treatment. Treatment depends on the severity of
hypokalaemia and the presence of symptoms and
ECG abnormalities. Gradual replacement of potas-
sium is preferable but in emergency intravenous
potassium is required. The maximum recommended
IV dose of potassium is 20 mmol h−1 , but more rapid
infusion, e.g., 2 mmol min−1 for 10 min followed by
10 mmol over 5—10 min is indicated for unstable
S138
arrhythmias when cardiac arrest is imminent. Con-
tinuous ECG monitoring is essential during IV infu-
sion, and the dose should be titrated after repeated
sampling of serum potassium levels.
Many patients who are potassium deficient are
also deficient in magnesium. Magnesium is impor-
tant for potassium uptake and for the mainte-
nance of intracellular potassium levels, partic-
ularly in the myocardium. Repletion of magne-
sium stores will facilitate more rapid correction of
hypokalaemia and is recommended in severe cases
of hypokalaemia.8
Calcium and magnesium disorders
The recognition and management of calcium and
magnesium disorders is summarised in Table 7.1.
Summary
Electrolyte abnormalities are among the most com-
mon causes of cardiac arrhythmias. Of all the
electrolyte abnormalities, hyperkalaemia is most
rapidly fatal. A high degree of clinical suspicion and
immediate treatment of the underlying electrolyte
abnormalities can prevent many patients from pro-
gressing to cardiac arrest.
7b. Poisoning
General considerations
Poisoning is an infrequent cause of cardiac arrest,
but remains a leading cause in victims younger than
40 years.9—12 Most research on this topic consists
primarily of small case series, animal studies and
case reports.
Self-poisoning with therapeutic or recreational
drugs is the main reason for hospital admission.
Drug toxicity can also be caused by inappropriate
dosing and drug interactions. Accidental poisoning
is commonest in children. Homicidal poisoning is
uncommon. Industrial accidents, warfare or ter-
rorism may cause extensive chemical or radiation
exposure. Decontamination and safe management
for mass casualty incidents is not part of these
guidelines.
Resuscitation
Treatment of the self-poisoning (‘overdose’)
patient is based on an ABCDE approach to pre-
vent cardiorespiratory arrest whilst awaiting drug
elimination.13 Airway obstruction and respiratory
J. Soar et al.
arrest secondary to a decreased conscious level is
a common cause of death. Alcohol excess is often
associated with self-poisoning.
• After opening and clearing the airway, check for
breathing and a pulse. Avoid mouth-to-mouth
resuscitation in the presence of toxins, such
as cyanide, hydrogen sulphide, corrosives and
organophosphates. Ventilate the patient’s lungs
using a pocket- or bag-mask and the highest
possible concentration of oxygen. Be careful in
paraquat poisoning as pulmonary injury may be
exacerbated by high concentrations of oxygen.14
• There is a high incidence of pulmonary aspira-
tion of gastric contents after poisoning. Intubate
unconscious patients who cannot protect their
airway early, using a rapid-sequence induction
with cricoid pressure to decrease the risk of aspi-
ration (see section 4d). This must be undertaken
by persons trained in the technique.
• In the event of cardiac arrest, provide standard
basic and advanced life support.
• With the exception of torsades de pointes
(see below), cardioversion is indicated for life-
threatening tachyarrhythmias (see section 4f).
• Drug-induced hypotension is common after self-
poisoning. This usually responds to fluid therapy,
but occasionally inotropic support is required.
• Once resuscitation is under way, try to identify
the poison(s). Relatives, friends and ambulance
crews can usually provide useful information.
Examination of the patient may reveal diagnos-
tic clues, such as odours, needle puncture marks,
pinpoint pupils, tablet residues, signs of corro-
sion in the mouth or blisters associated with pro-
longed coma.
• Measure the patient’s temperature; hypo- or
hyperthermia may occur after drug overdose (see
sections 7d and 7e).
• Consult regional or national poisons centres
for information on treatment of the poi-
soned patient.15,16 The World Health Orga-
nization lists poison centres on its website:
http://www.who.int/ipcs/poisons/centre/en/.
Specific therapeutic measures
There are few specific therapeutic measures for
poisons that are useful immediately. The emphasis
is on intensive supportive therapy, with correction
of hypoxia, hypotension and acid/base and elec-
trolyte disorders.
Therapeutic measures include limiting absorp-
tion of ingested poisons, enhancing elimination,
or the use of specific antidotes. For up-to-date
guidance in severe or uncommon poisonings, seek
 European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Table 7.1 Calcium (Ca2+ ) and magnesium (Mg2+ ) disorders with associated clinical presentation, ECG manifestations and recommended treatment
Disorder Causes Presentation ECG Treatment
2+
Hypercalcaemia (Ca Primary or tertiary Confusion Short QT interval Fluid replacement IV
>2.6 mmol l−1 hyperparathyroidism Weakness Prolonged QRS interval Furosemide, 1 mg kg−1 IV
Malignancy Abdominal pain Flat T waves Hydrocortisone, 200—300 mg IV
Sarcoidosis Hypotension AV-block Pamidronate, 60—90 mg IV
Drugs Arrhythmias Cardiac arrest Calcitonin, 4—8 units kg−1 8 h−1 IM
Cardiac arrest Review medication
Haemodialysis
Hypocalcaemia (Ca2+ Chronic renal failure Paraesthesia Prolonged QT interval Calcium chloride 10%, 10—40 ml
<2.1 mmol l−1 Acute pancreatitis Tetany T-wave inversion Magnesium sulphate 50%, 4—8 mmol (if
Calcium channel blocker Seizures Heart block necessary)
overdose AV-block Cardiac arrest
Toxic shock syndrome Cardiac arrest
Rhabdomyolysis
Tumour lysis syndrome
Hypermagnesaemia Renal failure Confusion Prolonged PR and QT Calcium chloride 10%, 5—10 ml,
(Mg2+ > 1.1 mmol l−1 ) Iatrogenic Weakness intervals repeated if necessary
Respiratory depression T-wave peaking Ventilatory support if necessary
AV-block AV-block Saline diuresis: 0.9% saline with
Cardiac arrest Cardiac arrest furosemide 1 mg kg−1 IV
Haemodialysis

Hypomagnesaemia Gastrointestinal loss Tremor Prolonged PR and QT Severe or symptomatic: 2 g 50%

(Mg2+ <0.6 mmol l−1 ) Polyuria Ataxia Intervals magnesium sulphate (4 ml = 8 mmol) IV
Starvation Nystagmus ST-segment depression over 15 min
Alcoholism Seizures Torsades de pointes Torsade de pointes: 2 g 50%
Malabsorption Arrhythmias: torsades T-wave inversion magnesium sulphate (4 ml = 8 mmol) IV
de pointes Flattened P waves over 1—2 min
Cardiac arrest Increased QRS duration Seizure: 2 g 50% magnesium sulphate
(4 ml = 8 mmol) IV over 10 min

S139
S140
advice from a poisons centre.
• Activated charcoal is known to adsorb certain
drugs. Its value decreases over time after inges-
tion. There is no evidence that ingestion of char-
coal improves clinical outcome. According to evi-
dence from volunteer studies, consider giving a
single dose of activated charcoal to patients who
have ingested a potentially toxic amount of poi-
son (known to be adsorbed by activated charcoal)
up to 1 h previously.17 Give it only to patients
with an intact or protected airway. Multiple doses
of activated charcoal can be beneficial in life-
threatening poisoning with carbemazepine, dap-
sone, phenobarbital, quinine and theophylline.
• Gastric lavage followed by activated charcoal
therapy is useful only within 1 h of ingesting the
poison.17 Generally this should be carried out
after tracheal intubation. Delayed gastric lavage
has very little effect on drug absorption and may
propel drugs further along the gastrointestinal
tract.18 Do not give ipecacuanha syrup to induce
vomiting; there is little evidence of benefit.19
• There is little evidence for the use of laxatives,
e.g., lactulose or magnesium citrate, to enhance
drug elimination from the gut.20
• Whole-bowel irrigation by enteral administra-
tion of a polyethylene glycol solution can reduce
drug absorption by cleansing the gastrointesti-
nal tract. It can be useful in cases of potentially
toxic ingestion of sustained release or enteric-
coated drugs, oral iron poisoning and the removal
of ingested packets of illicit drugs.21
• Urine alkalinisation (pH 7.5) by giving IV sodium
bicarbonate can be useful in moderate-to-severe
salicylate poisoning in patients who do not need
haemodialysis.22 Urine alkalinisation can also be
useful in tricyclic overdose (see below).
• Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion can be use-
ful for elimination of specific life-threatening
toxins. Haemodialysis removes drugs or metabo-
lites that are water soluble, have a low vol-
ume of distribution and low plasma protein
binding.23 It may be considered for poison-
ing with methanol, ethylene glycol, salicylates
and lithium. Haemoperfusion involves passing
blood through an absorptive-containing cartridge
(usually charcoal). This technique removes sub-
stances that have a high degree of plasma pro-
tein binding. Charcoal haemoperfusion may be
indicated for intoxications with carbamazepine,
phenobarbital, phenytoin and theophylline.
• Specific antidotes (see below) which may be
effective include: N-acetylcysteine for parac-
etamol; high-dose atropine for organophosphate
insecticides; sodium nitrite, sodium thiosulphate
J. Soar et al.
or dicobalt edetate for cyanides; digoxin-specific
Fab antibodies for digoxin; flumazenil for ben-
zodiazepines; and naloxone for opioids. Reversal
of benzodiazepine intoxication with flumazenil
is associated with significant toxicity in patients
with benzodiazepine dependence or co-ingestion
of proconvulsant medications, such as tricyclic
antidepressants.24 The routine use of flumazenil
in the comatose patient with an overdose is not
recommended.
Specific antidotes
These guidelines will address only some causes of
cardiorespiratory arrest due to poisoning.
Opioid poisoning
Opioid poisoning commonly causes respiratory
depression followed by respiratory insufficiency or
respiratory arrest. The respiratory effects of opi-
oids are reversed rapidly by the opiate antago-
nist naloxone. In severe respiratory depression, the
evidence shows fewer adverse events when air-
way opening, oxygen administration and ventila-
tion are carried out before giving naloxone in cases
of opioid-induced respiratory depression;25—30 how-
ever, the use of naloxone can prevent the need for
intubation. The preferred route for giving naloxone
depends on the skills of the rescuer: IV, intramus-
cular (IM), subcutaneous (SC), endotracheal (ET)
and intranasal (IN) routes can be used. The non-
IV routes can be quicker because time is saved in
not having to establish IV access, which can be
extremely difficult in an IV drug abuser. The ini-
tial doses of naloxone are 400 mcg IV,27 800 mcg
IM, 800 mcg SC,27 2 mg IN31 or 1—2 mg ET. Large
opioid overdoses may require titration to a total
naloxone dose of 6—10 mg. The duration of action
of naloxone is approximately 45—70 min, but respi-
ratory depression can persist for 4—5 h after opioid
overdose. Thus, the clinical effects of naloxone may
not last as long as those of a significant opioid over-
dose. Titrate the dose until the victim is breathing
adequately and has protective airway reflexes.
Acute withdrawal from opioids produces a state
of sympathetic excess and may cause compli-
cations, such as pulmonary oedema, ventricular
arrhythmia and severe agitation. Use naloxone
reversal of opiate intoxication with caution in
patients suspected of opioid dependence.
There is no good evidence that naloxone
improves outcome once cardiac arrest associated
with opioid toxicity has occurred. Cardiac arrest is
usually secondary to a respiratory arrest and associ-
ated with severe brain hypoxia. Prognosis is poor.26
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Giving naloxone is unlikely to be harmful. Once car-
diac arrest has occurred, follow the standard resus-
citation protocols.
Tricyclic antidepressants
Self-poisoning with tricyclic antidepressants is com-
mon and can cause hypotension, seizures and
arrhythmias. Anticholinergic effects include mydri-
asis, fever, dry skin, delirium, tachycardia, ileus
and urinary retention. Most life-threatening prob-
lems occur within the first 6 h after ingestion. A
widening QRS complex indicates a greater risk of
arrhythmias. There is evidence to support the use of
sodium bicarbonate to treat arrhythmias induced by
tricyclic antidepressants and/or hypotension.32—47
The exact threshold for starting treatment based
on QRS duration has not been established. No study
has investigated the optimal target arterial or uri-
nary pH with bicarbonate therapy, but an arterial
pH of 7.45—7.55 has been commonly accepted and
seems reasonable. Hypertonic saline may also be
effective in treating cardiac toxicity.48
Cocaine toxicity
Sympathetic overstimulation associated with
cocaine toxicity may cause agitation, symptomatic
tachycardia, hypertensive crisis, hyperthermia and
myocardial ischaemia with angina. Glyceryl trini-
trate and phentolamine reverse cocaine-induced
coronary vasoconstriction, labetalol has no signifi-
cant effect, and propranolol makes it worse.49—52
Small doses of IV benzodiazepines (midazolam,
diazepam, lorazepam) are effective first-line
drugs. Use nitrates only as second-line therapy for
myocardial ischaemia. Labetalol (alpha- and beta-
blocker) is useful for the treatment of tachycardia
and hypertensive emergencies due to cocaine
toxicity.
Drug-induced severe bradycardia
Severe bradycardia from poisoning or drug over-
dose may be refractory to standard ALS protocols
because of prolonged receptor binding or direct
cellular toxicity. Atropine may be life saving in
organophosphate, carbamate or nerve agent poi-
soning. Give atropine for bradycardia caused by
acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting substances. Large
(2—4 mg) and repeated doses may be required to
achieve a clinical effect. Isoprenaline may be useful
at high doses in refractory bradycardia induced by
beta-antagonist receptor blockade. Heart block and
ventricular arrhythmias associated with digoxin or
digitalis glycoside poisoning may be treated effec-
S141
tively with digoxin-specific antibody fragments.53
Antibody-specific therapy may also be effective in
poisoning from plants as well as Chinese herbal
medications containing digitalis glycosides.53—55
Vasopressors, inotropes, calcium, glucagon,
phosphodiesterase inhibitors and insulin-glucose
may all be useful in beta-blocker and calcium chan-
nel blocker overdose.56—58 Transcutaneous pacing
may be effective for severe bradycardia caused by
poisoning and overdose (see section 3).
Further treatment and prognosis
A long period of coma in a single position can cause
pressure sores and rhabdomyolysis. Measure elec-
trolytes (particularly potassium), blood glucose and
arterial blood gases. Monitor temperature because
thermoregulation is impaired. Both hypothermia
and hyperthermia (hyperpyrexia) can occur after
the overdose of some drugs. Retain samples of blood
and urine for analysis.
Be prepared to continue resuscitation for a pro-
longed period, particularly in young patients as
the poison may be metabolised or excreted during
extended life support measures.
Alternative approaches which may be effective
in severely poisoned patients include:
• higher doses of medication than in standard pro-
tocols;
• non-standard drug therapies;
• prolonged CPR.
7c. Drowning
Overview
Drowning is a common cause of accidental death in
Europe. The most important and detrimental con-
sequence of drowning is hypoxia. The duration of
hypoxia is the critical factor in determining the
victim’s outcome. Therefore, oxygenation, venti-
lation and perfusion should be restored as rapidly
as possible. Immediate resuscitation at the scene
is essential for survival and neurological recovery
after drowning. This will require bystander provi-
sion of CPR plus immediate activation of the EMS
system. Victims who have spontaneous circulation
and breathing when they reach hospital usually
recover with good outcomes.
Epidemiology
The World Health Organization (WHO) esti-
mates that, worldwide, drowning accounts for
S142
approximately 450,000 deaths each year. A further
1.3 million disability-adjusted life-years are lost
each year as a result of premature death or disabil-
ity from drowning;59 97% of deaths from drowning
occur in low- and middle-income countries.59 In
2002, there were 427 deaths from drowning in the
United Kingdom (Royal Society for the Prevention
of Accidents 2002) and 4073 in the United States
(National Center for Injury Prevention 2002),
yielding an annual incidence of drowning of 0.8
and 1.45 per 100,000 population, respectively.
Death from drowning is more common in young
males and is the leading cause of accidental death
in Europe in this group.59 Alcohol consumption is a
contributory factor in up to 70% of drownings.60
The guidelines in this chapter focus on the treat-
ment of the individual drowning victim rather than
the management of mass casualty aquatic inci-
dents.
Definitions, classifications and reporting
Over 30 different terms have been used to describe
the process and outcome from submersion- and
immersion-related incidents.61 To improve clarity
and to help comparability of future scientific and
epidemiological reports, the International Liaison
Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) has proposed
new definitions related to drowning.62 Drowning
itself is defined as a process resulting in primary res-
piratory impairment from submersion/immersion in
a liquid medium. Implicit in this definition is that
a liquid/air interface is present at the entrance
of the victim’s airway, preventing the victim from
breathing air. The victim may live or die after this
process, but whatever the outcome, he or she has
been involved in a drowning incident. Immersion
means to be covered in water or other fluid. For
drowning to occur, usually at least the face and
airway must be immersed. Submersion implies that
the entire body, including the airway, is under the
water or other fluid.
ILCOR recommends that the following terms,
previously used, should no longer be used: dry and
wet drowning, active and passive drowning, silent
drowning, secondary drowning and drowned versus
near-drowned.62
Basic life support
Aquatic rescue and recovery from the water
Always be aware of personal safety and minimise
the danger to yourself and the victim at all times.
Whenever possible, attempt to save the drowning
victim without entry into water. Talking to the vic-
J. Soar et al.
tim, reaching with a rescue aid (e.g., stick or cloth-
ing), or throwing a rope or buoyant rescue aid may
be effective if the victim is close to dry land. Alter-
natively, use a boat or other water vehicle to assist
with the rescue. Avoid entry into the water when-
ever possible. If entry into the water is essential,
take a buoyant rescue aid or flotation device.
Remove all the drowning victims from the water
by the fastest and safest means available and resus-
citate as quickly as possible. The incidence of
cervical spine injury in drowning victims is low
(approximately 0.5%).63 Spinal immobilisation can
be difficult to perform in the water and can delay
removal from the water and adequate resuscita-
tion of the victim. Poorly applied cervical collars
can also cause airway obstruction in unconscious
patients.64 Despite potential spinal injury, victims
who are pulseless and apnoeic should be removed
from water as quickly as possible (even if a back
support device is not available), while attempt-
ing to limit neck flexion and extension. Cervical
spine immobilisation is not indicated unless signs of
severe injury are apparent or the history is consis-
tent with the possibility of severe injury.65 These
circumstances include a history of diving, water-
slide use, signs of trauma or signs of alcohol intoxi-
cation. Whenever possible, remove the victim from
the water in a horizontal position to minimise the
risks of post-immersion hypotension and cardiovas-
cular collapse.66
Rescue breathing
The first and most important treatment for the
drowning victim is alleviation of hypoxaemia.
Prompt initiation of rescue breathing or positive
pressure ventilation increases the survival.67,68 In
the apnoeic victim, start rescue breathing as soon
as the victim’s airway is opened and the rescuer’s
safety ensured. This can sometimes be achieved
when the victim is still in shallow water. It is likely
to be difficult to pinch the victim’s nose, so mouth-
to-nose ventilation may be used as an alternative to
mouth-to-mouth ventilation. If the victim is in deep
water, start in-water rescue breathing if trained to
do so, ideally with the support of a buoyant rescue
aid,69 although in-water, unsupported resuscitation
may also be possible.70 Untrained rescuers should
not attempt to perform any form of resuscitation
with a victim in deep water.
If there is no spontaneous breathing after open-
ing the airway, give rescue breaths for approxi-
mately 1 min.69 If the victim does not start breath-
ing spontaneously, further management depends on
the distance from land. If the victim can be brought
to land in <5 min of rescue time, continue rescue
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
breaths while towing. If more than an estimated
5 min from land, give further rescue breaths over
1 min, then bring the victim to land as quickly as
possible without further attempts at ventilation.69
There is no need to clear the airway of aspi-
rated water. The majority of drowning victims aspi-
rate only a modest amount of water, and this is
absorbed rapidly into the central circulation. An
attempt to remove water from the air passages
by any means other than suction is unnecessary
and dangerous. Abdominal thrusts cause regurgi-
tation of gastric contents and subsequent aspira-
tion. They have been associated with other life-
threatening injuries and should not be performed
unless there are clear signs of foreign-body airway
obstruction.71
Chest compression
As soon as the victim is removed from water,
check for breathing. A healthcare professional who
is trained in pulse checking may also check for
pulse, but this may be even more difficult to find
in a drowning victim, particularly if cold. If the
victim is not breathing, start chest compressions
immediately. Chest compression is ineffective in
water.72,73
Defibrillation
If the victim is unresponsive and not breathing and
an AED is available, attach it to the victim and
turn it on. Before attaching the AED pads, dry
the victim’s chest to enable adherence. Deliver
shocks according to the AED prompts. If the vic-
tim is hypothermic with a core body temperature
≤30 ◦ C (86 ◦ F), limit defibrillation to a total of three
attempts until the core body temperature rises
above 30 ◦ C (86 ◦ F).74
Regurgitation during resuscitation
Regurgitation of stomach contents is common fol-
lowing resuscitation from drowning and will com-
plicate efforts to maintain a patent airway. In one
study, regurgitation occurred in two-thirds of vic-
tims who received rescue breathing and 86% of vic-
tims who required compression and ventilation.75
If regurgitation occurs, turn the victim’s mouth to
the side and remove the regurgitated material using
directed suction if possible. If spinal cord injury is
suspected, log-roll the victim, keeping the head,
neck and torso aligned, before aspirating the regur-
gitated material. Log-rolling will require several
rescuers.
S143
Advanced life support
Airway and breathing
Give high-flow oxygen during the initial assess-
ment of the spontaneously breathing drowning
victim. Consider non-invasive ventilation or contin-
uous positive airway pressure if the victim fails to
respond to treatment with high-flow oxygen.76 Use
pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas analysis to
titrate the concentration of inspired oxygen and
to provide an indicator of the adequacy of ven-
tilation. Consider early intubation and controlled
ventilation for victims who fail to respond to these
initial measures or who have a reduced level of
consciousness. Take care to ensure optimal preoxy-
genation before intubation. Use a rapid-sequence
induction with cricoid pressure to reduce the high
risk of aspiration.77 Protect the airway of the victim
in cardiopulmonary arrest early in the resuscita-
tion attempt, ideally with a tracheal tube. Reduced
pulmonary compliance requiring high inflation pres-
sures may limit the use of adjuncts, such as the
laryngeal mask airway. Initiate ventilation with a
high-inspired oxygen concentration as soon as pos-
sible, to treat the severe hypoxaemia that is likely
to be present.
Circulation and defibrillation
Follow standard advanced life support protocols. If
severe hypothermia is present (core body temper-
ature ≤30 ◦ C or 86 ◦ F), limit defibrillation attempts
to three, and withhold IV drugs until the core
body temperature increases above these levels. If
moderate hypothermia is present, give IV drugs at
longer than standard intervals (see section 7d).
During prolonged immersion, victims may
become hypovolaemic from the hydrostatic pres-
sure of water on the body. Give IV fluid to correct
the hypovolaemia but avoid excessive volumes,
which may cause pulmonary oedema. After return
of spontaneous circulation, use haemodynamic
monitoring to guide fluid resuscitation.
Discontinuing resuscitation efforts
Making a decision to discontinue resuscitation
efforts on a victim of drowning is notoriously dif-
ficult. No single factor can accurately predict good
or poor survival with 100% certainty. Decisions made
in the field frequently prove later to have been
incorrect.78 Continue resuscitation unless there
is clear evidence that resuscitation attempts are
futile (e.g., massive traumatic injuries, rigor mor-
tis, putrefaction etc.), or timely evacuation to
S144
a medical facility is not possible. Neurologically
intact survival has been reported in several victims
submerged for greater than 60 min.79,80
Post-resuscitation care
Salt versus fresh water
Much attention has been focused in the past on dif-
ferences between salt- and fresh-water drowning.
Extensive data from animal studies and human case
series have shown that, irrespective of the tonicity
of the inhaled fluid, the predominant pathophys-
iological process is hypoxaemia, driven by surfac-
tant wash-out and dysfunction, alveolar collapse,
atelectasis and intrapulmonary shunting. Small dif-
ferences in electrolyte disturbance are rarely of any
clinical relevance and do not usually require treat-
ment.
Lung injury
Victims of drowning are at high risk of develop-
ing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for
upto 72 h after submersion. Protective ventilation
strategies improve survival in patients with ARDS.81
The propensity towards alveolar collapse may
require the use of PEEP or other alveolar recruit-
ment manoeuvres to reverse severe hypoxaemia.82
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and nitric
oxide administration have been used in some cen-
tres for refractory hypoxaemia in drowning victims
but the efficacy of these treatments is unproven.65
Pneumonia is common after drowning. Prophy-
lactic antibiotics have not been shown to be of
benefit, although they may be considered after
submersion in grossly contaminated water such as
sewage. Give broad-spectrum antibiotics if signs of
infection develop subsequently.65
Hypothermia
Victims of submersion may develop primary or
secondary hypothermia. If the submersion occurs
in icy water (<5 ◦ C or 41 ◦ F), hypothermia may
develop rapidly and provide some protection
against hypoxia. Such effects, however, have typ-
ically been reported after submersion of children
in icy water.59 Hypothermia may also develop as
a secondary complication of the submersion, and
subsequent heat loss through evaporation dur-
ing attempted resuscitation. In these victims the
hypothermia is not protective (see section 7d).
Several small clinical studies in patients with
accidental hypothermia have shown that survival
may be improved by either passive or active warm-
ing out of hospital or in the emergency room.65
J. Soar et al.
In contrast, there is evidence of benefit from
induced hypothermia for comatose victims resus-
citated from prehospital cardiac arrests.83 To date,
there is no convincing evidence to guide therapy
in this patient group. A pragmatic approach might
be to consider instituting active rewarming until a
core temperature of 32—34 ◦ C is achieved, and then
actively to avoid hyperthermia (>37 ◦ C) during the
subsequent period of intensive care (International
Life Saving Federation, 2003).
Other supportive care
Attempts have been made to improve neurologi-
cal outcome following drowning with the use of
barbiturates, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring
and steroids. None of these interventions has been
shown to alter the outcome. In fact, signs of high
ICP serve as a symptom of significant neurological
hypoxic injury, and no evidence that attempts to
alter the ICP will affect the outcome.65
7d. Hypothermia
Definition
Hypothermia exists when the body core tempera-
ture is below 35 ◦ C and is classified arbitrarily as
mild (35—32 ◦ C), moderate (32—30 ◦ C) or severe
(less than 30 ◦ C). Hypothermia can occur in peo-
ple with normal thermoregulation who are exposed
to cold environments, particularly wet or windy
conditions, or following immersion in cold water.
When thermoregulation is impaired, for example,
in the elderly and very young, hypothermia may
follow a mild cold insult. The risk of hypother-
mia is also increased by drug or alcohol ingestion,
illness, injury or neglect. Hypothermia may be sus-
pected from the clinical history or a brief external
examination of a collapsed patient. A low-reading
thermometer is needed to measure the core tem-
perature and confirm diagnosis.
In some cases, hypothermia may exert a protec-
tive effect on the brain after cardiac arrest.84,85
Intact neurological recovery may be possible after
hypothermic cardiac arrest, although those with
non-asphyxial arrest have a better prognosis than
those with asphyxial hypothermic arrest.86—88 Life-
saving procedures should not be withheld on the
basis of clinical presentation alone.87
Decision to resuscitate
Beware of pronouncing death in a hypothermic
patient, as cold alone may produce a very slow,
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
small-volume, irregular pulse and an unrecordable
blood pressure. Hypothermia protects the brain and
vital organs, and associated arrhythmias are poten-
tially reversible either before or during rewarming.
At 18 ◦ C the brain can tolerate periods of circula-
tory arrest for 10 times longer than at 37 ◦ C. Dilated
pupils can be caused by a variety of insults and must
not be taken as a sign of death.
On discovering a hypothermic cardiac arrest
victim in cold environment, it is not always easy
to distinguish between primary and secondary
hypothermia. Cardiac arrest could be caused pri-
marily by hypothermia, or hypothermia could fol-
low a normothermic cardiac arrest (e.g., cardiac
arrest caused by myocardial ischaemia in a person
in cold environment).
Do not confirm death until the patient has been
rewarmed or until attempts to raise the core tem-
perature have failed; prolonged resuscitation may
be necessary. In the prehospital setting, resusci-
tation should be withheld only if the patient has
obvious lethal injuries or if the body is completely
frozen making resuscitation attempts impossible.89
In the hospital setting, use clinical judgment to
determine when to stop resuscitating a hypother-
mic arrest victim.
Resuscitation
All the principles of prevention, basic and advanced
life support apply to the hypothermic patient. Do
not delay the urgent procedures, such as intu-
bation and insertion of vascular catheters. Intu-
bation can provoke VF in a patient with severe
hypothermia.87,90
• Clear the airway and, if there is no spontaneous
respiratory effort, ventilate the patient’s lungs
with high concentrations of oxygen. If possible,
use warmed (40—46 ◦ C) and humidified oxygen.
Consider careful tracheal intubation when indi-
cated according to the ALS algorithm.
• Palpate a major artery and, if available, look at
the ECG for up to 1 min and look for signs of life
before concluding that there is no cardiac out-
put. If a Doppler ultrasound probe is available,
use it to establish whether there is peripheral
blood flow. If the victim is pulseless, start chest
compressions immediately. If there is any doubt
about whether a pulse is present, start CPR.
• Once resuscitation is under way, confirm
hypothermia with a low-reading thermometer.
The method of temperature measurement
should be the same throughout resuscitation and
rewarming. Use oesophageal, bladder, rectal or
tympanic temperature measurements.91,92
S145
Use the same ventilation and chest compression
rates as for a normothermic patient. Hypothermia
can cause stiffness of the chest wall, making venti-
lation and chest compression difficult.
The hypothermic heart may be unresponsive
to cardioactive drugs, attempted electrical pac-
ing and attempted defibrillation. Drug metabolism
is slowed, leading to potentially toxic plasma
concentrations of any drug given repeatedly.90
The evidence for the efficacy of drugs in severe
hypothermia is limited and based mainly on animal
studies. Adrenaline may be effective in increas-
ing coronary perfusion pressure, but not survival,
in severe hypothermic cardiac arrest.93,94 The effi-
cacy of amiodarone is also reduced.95 For these
reasons, withhold adrenaline and other drugs until
the patient has been warmed to a temperature
greater than 30 ◦ C. Once 30 ◦ C has been reached,
the intervals between doses should be doubled. As
the patient’s temperature returns towards normal,
the standard drug protocols should be used.
Remember to rule out other primary causes of
cardiorespiratory arrest using the four Hs and four
Ts approach (e.g., drug overdose, hypothyroidism,
trauma).
Arrhythmias
As the body core temperature decreases, sinus
bradycardia tends to give way to atrial fibrillation
(AF) followed by ventricular fibrillation (VF) and
finally asystole.96 Follow the standard treatment
protocols.
Severely hypothermic victims (core tempera-
ture <30 ◦ C) in cardiac arrest in hospital must be
rapidly rewarmed using internal methods. Arrhyth-
mias other than VF tend to revert spontaneously
as the core temperature increases, and usually do
not require immediate treatment. Bradycardia may
be physiological in severe hypothermia, and cardiac
pacing is not indicated unless bradycardia persists
after rewarming.
The temperature at which defibrillation should
first be attempted and how often it should be tried
in the severely hypothermic patient has not been
established. AEDs may be used on these patients. If
VF is detected, give a shock; if VF/VT persists after
three shocks, delay further defibrillation attempts
until the core temperature is above 30 ◦ C.97,98 If an
AED is used, follow the AED prompts while rewarm-
ing the patient.
Rewarming
General measures for all casualties include removal
from the cold environment, prevention of further
S146
heat loss and rapid transfer to the hospital. Remove
cold or wet clothing as soon as possible. Cover the
dry casualties with blankets and keep them out of
the wind.
Rewarming may be passive external, active
external, or active internal. Passive warming is
achieved with blankets and a warm room, and is
suitable for conscious victims with mild hypother-
mia. In severe hypothermia or cardiac arrest,
active warming is required, but this must not
delay transport to a hospital where more advanced
rewarming techniques are available. Several tech-
niques have been described, although there are no
clinical trials of outcome to determine the best
rewarming method. Studies show that forced air
rewarming and warm IV fluids are effective in
patients with severe hypothermia and a perfus-
ing rhythm.99,100 Other warming techniques include
the use of warm humidified gases, gastric, peri-
toneal, pleural or bladder lavage with warm fluids
(at 40 ◦ C), and extracorporeal blood warming with
partial bypass.87,90,101—103
In the patient with cardiac arrest and hypother-
mia, cardiopulmonary bypass is the preferred
method of active internal rewarming because it
also provides circulation, oxygenation and ventila-
tion, while the core body temperature is increased
gradually.104,105 Survivors in one case series had an
average of 65 min of conventional CPR before car-
diopulmonary bypass.105 Unfortunately, facilities
for cardiopulmonary bypass are not always avail-
able and a combination of methods may have to be
used.
During rewarming, patients will require large
volumes of fluids as their vascular space expands
with vasodilation. Warm all the IV fluids. Use con-
tinuous haemodynamic monitoring and, if possi-
ble, treat the patient in a critical care unit. Avoid
hyperthermia during and after the warming period.
Although there are no formal studies, once ROSC
has been achieved use standard strategies for post-
resuscitation care, including mild hypothermia if
appropriate (section 4g). There is no evidence
for the routine use of steroids, barbiturates or
antibiotics.106,107
7e. Hyperthermia
Definition
Hyperthermia occurs when the body’s ability
to thermoregulate fails, and core temperature
exceeds the one that is normally maintained
by homeostatic mechanisms. Hyperthermia may
be exogenous, caused by environmental condi-
J. Soar et al.
tions, or secondary to endogenous heat produc-
tion.
Environment-related hyperthermia occurs where
heat, usually in the form of radiant energy, is
absorbed by the body at a rate faster than that can
be lost by thermoregulatory mechanisms. Hyper-
thermia occurs along a continuum of heat-related
conditions, starting with heat stress, progressing
to heat exhaustion, to heat stroke (HS) and finally
multiorgan dysfunction and cardiac arrest in some
instances.108
Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare disorder of
skeletal muscle calcium homeostasis characterised
by muscle contracture and life-threatening hyper-
metabolic crisis following exposure of genetically
predisposed individuals to halogenated anaesthet-
ics and depolarising muscle relaxants.109,110
The key features and treatment of heat stress
and heat exhaustion are included in Table 7.2.
Heat stroke (HS)
HS is a systemic inflammatory response with a
core temperature above 40.6 ◦ C, accompanied by
mental state change and varying levels of organ
dysfunction. There are two forms of HS: clas-
sic non-exertion heat stroke (CHS) occuring dur-
ing high environmental temperatures and often
effecting the elderly during heat waves;111 exer-
tion heat stroke (EHS) occuring during strenu-
ous physical exercise in high environmental tem-
peratures and/or high humidity usually effecting
healthy young adults.112 Mortality from HS ranges
between 10 and 50%.113
Predisposing factors
The elderly are at an increased risk for heat-related
illness because of underlying illness, medication
use, declining thermoregulatory mechanisms and
limited social support. There are several risk fac-
tors: lack of acclimatisation, dehydration, obe-
sity, alcohol, cardiovascular disease, skin condi-
tions (psoriasis, eczema, scleroderma, burn, cys-
tic fibrosis), hyperthyroidism, phaeochromocytoma
and drugs (anticholinergics, diamorphine, cocaine,
amphetamine, phenothiazines, sympathomimetics,
calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers).
Clinical presentation
Heat stroke can resemble septic shock and may be
caused by similar mechanisms.114 Features include:
• core temperature 40.6 ◦ C or more;
• hot, dry skin (sweating is present in about 50% of
cases of exertional heat stroke);
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S147

Table 7.2 Heat stress and heat exhaustion

Condition Features Treatment
Heat stress Normal or mild temperature elevation Rest
Heat oedema: swelling of feet and ankles Elevation of oedematous limbs
Heat syncope: vasodilation causing hypotension Cooling
Heat cramps: sodium depletion causing cramps Oral rehydration
Salt replacement
Heat exhaustion Systemic reaction to prolonged heat exposure As above
(hours to days)
Temperature >37 ◦ C and <40 ◦ C Consider IV fluids and ice packs
for severe cases
Headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, tachycar-
dia, hypotension, sweating muscle pain, weak-
ness and cramps
Haemoconcentration
Hyponatraemia or hypernatraemia
May progress rapidly to heat stroke

• early signs and symptoms, e.g., extreme fatigue, Cooling techniques

headache, fainting, facial flushing, vomiting and
diarrhoea;
• cardiovascular dysfunction including arrhyth-
mias115 and hypotension;
• respiratory dysfunction including ARDS;116
• central nervous system dysfunction including
seizures and coma;117
• liver and renal failure;118
• coagulopathy;116
• rhabdomyolysis.119
Other clinical conditions need to be considered,
including:
• drug toxicity;120,121
• drug withdrawal syndrome;
• serotonin syndrome;122
• neuroleptic malignant syndrome123
• sepsis;124
• central nervous system infection;
• endocrine disorders, e.g., thyroid storm, phaeo-
chromocytoma.125
Management
The mainstay of treatment is supportive ther-
apy based on optimising the ABCDEs and cool-
ing the patient.126,127 Start cooling before the
patient reaches the hospital. Aim to reduce the core
temperature to approximately 39 ◦ C. Patients with
severe heat stroke need to be managed in a criti-
cal care setting. Use haemodynamic monitoring to
guide fluid therapy. Large volumes of fluid may be
required. Correct the electrolyte abnormalities as
described in Section 7a.
Several cooling methods have been described,
but there are few formal trials to determine
which method is best. Simple cooling techniques
include drinking cool fluids, fanning the completely
undressed patient and spraying tepid water on the
patient. Ice packs over areas where there are large
superficial blood vessels (axillae, groins, neck) may
also be useful. Surface cooling methods may cause
shivering. In cooperative stable patients, immer-
sion in cold water can be effective;128 however, this
may cause peripheral vasoconstriction, shunt blood
away from the periphery and reduce heat dissipa-
tion. Immersion is also not practical in the most sick
patients.
Further techniques to cool patients with hyper-
thermia are similar to those used for therapeu-
tic hypothermia after cardiac arrest (see section
4g). Gastric, peritoneal,129 pleural or bladder
lavage with cold water lowers the core tem-
perature. Intravascular cooling techniques include
the use of cold IV fluids,130 intravascular cool-
ing catheters131,132 and extracorporeal circuits,133
e.g., continuous veno-venous haemofiltration or
cardiopulmonary bypass.
Drug therapy in heat stroke
There are no specific drug therapies in heat stroke
to lower the core temperature. There is no good
evidence that antipyretics (e.g., non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs or paracetamol) are effective in
heat stroke. Dantrolene (see below) has not been
shown to be beneficial.134
S148
Malignant hyperthermia (MH)
MH is a life-threatening genetic sensitivity of skele-
tal muscles to volatile anaesthetics and depolaris-
ing neuromuscular blocking drugs, occurring during
or after anaesthesia. Stop triggering agents imme-
diately; give oxygen, correct acidosis and elec-
trolyte abnormalities. Start active cooling and give
dantrolene.135
Modifications to cardiopulmonary
resuscitation and post-resuscitation care
There are no specific studies on cardiac arrest in
hyperthermia. If cardiac arrest occurs, follow stan-
dard procedures for basic and advanced life sup-
port and cool the patient. There are no data on
the effects of hyperthermia on defibrillation thresh-
old; therefore, attempt defibrillation according to
current guidelines, while continuing to cool the
patient. Animal studies suggest that the progno-
sis is poor compared with normothermic cardiac
arrest.136,137 The risk of unfavourable neurological
outcome increases for each degree of body tem-
perature >37 ◦ C.138 Provide post-resuscitation care
according to the normal guidelines.
7f. Asthma
Introduction
Approximately 300 million people of all ages
and ethnic backgrounds suffer from asthma
worldwide.139 Asthma still causes many deaths in
young adults, mostly among those with chronic
severe asthma, adverse psychosocial circumstances
and poor medical management. National and inter-
national guidance for the management of asthma
already exists.139,140 The following guidelines focus
on the treatment of patients with near-fatal asthma
and cardiac arrest.
Causes of cardiac arrest
Cardiac arrest in the asthmatic person is often a
terminal event after a period of hypoxaemia; occa-
sionally, it may be sudden. Cardiac arrest in asth-
matics has been linked to:
• severe bronchospasm and mucous plugging lead-
ing to asphyxia (this condition causes the vast
majority of asthma-related deaths);
• cardiac arrhythmias caused by hypoxia, which is
the common cause of asthma-related arrhythmia.
Arrhythmias can be caused by stimulant drugs
J. Soar et al.
(e.g., beta-adrenergic agonists, aminophylline)
or electrolyte abnormalities;
• dynamic hyperinflation, i.e., autopositive end-
expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP), can occur in
mechanically ventilated asthmatics. Auto-PEEP
is caused by air trapping and ‘breath stack-
ing’ (breathed air entering and being unable to
escape). Gradual build-up of pressure occurs and
reduces blood flow and blood pressure;
• tension pneumothorax (often bilateral).
The four Hs and four Ts approach to reversible
causes helps identify these causes in cardiac arrest.
Diagnosis
Wheezing is a common physical finding, but sever-
ity does not correlate with the degree of airway
obstruction. The absence of wheezing may indi-
cate critical airway obstruction, whereas increased
wheezing may indicate a positive response to bron-
chodilator therapy. SaO2 may not reflect progres-
sive alveolar hypoventilation, particularly if oxygen
is being given. The SaO2 may initially decrease dur-
ing the therapy because beta-agonists cause both
bronchodilation and vasodilation and may increase
intrapulmonary shunting initially.
Other causes of wheezing include: pulmonary
oedema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD), pneumonia, anaphylaxis,141 pneumonia,
foreign bodies, pulmonary embolism, bronchiecta-
sis and subglottic mass.142
The severity of an asthma attack is defined in
Table 7.3.
Key interventions to prevent arrest
The patient with severe asthma requires aggres-
sive medical management to prevent deteriora-
tion. Base assessment and treatment on an ABCDE
approach. Experienced clinicians should treat these
high-risk patients in a critical care area. The spe-
cific drugs and the treatment sequence will vary
according to local practice.
Oxygen
Use a concentration of inspired oxygen that will
achieve an SaO2 ≥92%. High-flow oxygen by mask
is sometimes necessary. Consider rapid-sequence
induction and tracheal intubation if, despite efforts
to optimise drug therapy, the patient has:
• decreased conscious level, coma;
• profuse sweating;
• reduced muscle tone (clinical signs of hypercar-
bia);
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 S149

Table 7.3 The severity of asthma140

Asthma Features
Near-fatal Raised PaCO2 and/or requiring mechanical ventilation with raised inflation pressures
Life-threatening Any one of:
PEF <33% best or predicted
Bradycardia
SpO2 <92%, dysrhythmia
PaO2 <8 kPa, hypotension
Normal PaCO2 (4.6—6.0 kPa (35—45 mmHg)), exhaustion
Silent chest, confusion
Cyanosis, coma
Feeble respiratory effort
Acute severe Any one of:
PEF 33-50% best or predicted
Respiratory rate >25/min
Heart rate >110/min
Inability to complete sentences in one breath
Moderate exacerbation Increasing symptoms
PEF >50—75% best or predicted
No features of acute severe asthma
Brittle Type 1: wide PEF variability (>40% diurnal variation for >50% of the time over a period
>150 days) despite intense therapy
Type 2: sudden severe attacks on a background of apparently well controlled asthma
PEF, peak expiratory flow.

• findings of severe agitation, confusion and fight- Nebulised anticholinergics

ing against the oxygen mask (clinical signs of
hypoxemia).
Elevation of the PaCO2 alone does not indicate
the need for tracheal intubation. Treat the patient,
not the numbers.
Nebulised beta2 -agonists
Salbutamol, 5 mg nebulised, is the cornerstone of
therapy for acute asthma in most of the world.
Repeated doses every 15—20 min are often needed.
Severe asthma may necessitate continuous neb-
ulised salbutamol. Nebuliser units that can be
driven by high-flow oxygen should be available.
The hypoventilation associated with severe or near-
fatal asthma may prevent effective delivery of neb-
ulised drugs.
Intravenous corticosteroids
Oxygen and beta-agonists are the most important
therapies initially, but give corticosteroids (hydro-
cortisone, 200 mg IV,) early. Although there is no
difference in clinical effects between oral and IV
formulations of corticosteroids,143 the IV route is
preferable because patients with near-fatal asthma
may vomit or be unable to swallow.
Nebulised anticholinergics (ipratropium, 0.5 mg
4—6 h) may produce additional bronchodilation in
severe asthma or in those who do not respond to
beta-agonists.144,145
Intravenous salbutamol
Several studies have shown intravenous salbuta-
mol (250 mcg IV slowly) to provide additional ben-
efit in severe asthmatics who are already receiv-
ing nebulised salbutamol.146 Give an infusion of
3—20 mcg min−1 .
Intravenous magnesium sulphate
Magnesium sulphate (2 g, IV slowly) may be useful as
a bronchodilator in severe or near-fatal asthma. A
Cochrane meta-analysis of seven studies concluded
that magnesium is beneficial, particularly for those
with the most severe exacerbations.147 Magnesium
causes bronchial smooth muscle relaxation inde-
pendent of the serum magnesium level and has only
minor side effects (flushing, light-headedness).
Intravenous theophylline
Theophylline is given IV as aminophylline, a
mixture of theophylline with ethylenediamine,
S150
which is 20 times more soluble than theophylline
alone. Aminophylline should only be considered
in severe or near-fatal asthma. A loading dose
of 5 mg kg−1 is given over 20—30 min (unless on
maintenance therapy), followed by an infusion of
500—700 mcg kg−1 h−1 . Addition of this drug to high
doses of beta-agonists increases side effects more
than it increases bronchodilation. Check levels to
avoid toxicity.
Subcutaneous or intramuscular adrenaline and
terbutaline
Adrenaline and terbutaline are adrenergic agents
that may be given subcutaneously to patients
with acute severe asthma. The dose of subcuta-
neous adrenaline is 300 mcg up to a total of three
doses at 20-min intervals. Adrenaline may cause an
increase in heart rate, myocardial irritability and
increased oxygen demand; however, its use (even
in patients over 35 years old) is well tolerated.148
Terbutaline is given in a dose of 250 mcg subcu-
taneously, which can be repeated in 30—60 min.
These drugs are more commonly given to children
with acute asthma and, although most studies have
shown them to be equally effective,149 one study
concluded that terbutaline was superior.150 These
alternative routes may need to be considered when
IV access is impossible.
Intravenous fluids
Severe or near-fatal asthma is associated with
dehydration and hypovolaemia, and this will fur-
ther compromise the circulation in patients with
dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs. If there is evi-
dence of hypovolaemia or dehydration, give IV flu-
ids.
Heliox
Heliox is a mixture of helium and oxygen (usually
80:20 or 70:30). A recent meta-analysis of four
clinical trials did not support the use of heliox
in the initial treatment of patients with acute
asthma.151
Ketamine
Ketamine is a parenteral dissociative anaesthetic
with bronchodilatory properties. One case series
suggested substantial effectiveness,152 but the sin-
gle randomised trial published to date showed
no benefit to ketamine compared with standard
care.153
J. Soar et al.
Non-invasive ventilation
Non-invasive ventilation decreases the intubation
rate and mortality in COPD;154 however, its role
in patients with severe acute asthma is uncertain.
Although promising, a recent Cochrane review sug-
gests that more studies are needed.155
Management of cardiac arrest
Basic life support
Give basic life support according to the standard
guidelines. Ventilation will be difficult because of
increased airway resistance; try to prevent gastric
inflation.
Advanced life support
Modifications to standard ALS guidelines. Con-
sider the need for intubation early. The peak
airway pressures recorded during the ventila-
tion of patients with severe asthma (mean
67.8 ± 11.1 cmH2 0 in 12 patients) are significantly
higher than the normal lower oesophageal sphinc-
ter pressure (approximately 20 cmH2 0).156 There is
a significant risk of gastric inflation and hypoven-
tilation of the lungs when attempting to ventilate
a severe asthmatic without a tracheal tube. Dur-
ing cardiac arrest this risk is even higher because
the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure is sub-
stantially less than normal.157
The new recommended respiratory rate
(10 breaths min−1 ) and tidal volume required
for a normal chest rise during CPR should not
cause dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs (gas
trapping). Tidal volume depends on the inspiratory
time and inspiratory flow, while lung emptying
depends on the expiratory time and expiratory
flow. In mechanically ventilated severe asth-
matics, increasing the expiratory time (achieved
by reducing the respiratory rate) provides only
moderate gains in terms of reduced gas trapping
when a minute volume of less than 10 l min−1 is
used.156
There is limited evidence from the case
reports of unexpected ROSC in patients with
suspected gas trapping when the tracheal tube is
disconnected.158—161 If dynamic hyperinflation of
the lungs is suspected during CPR, compression of
the chest wall and/or a period of apnoea (discon-
nection of tracheal tube) may relieve gas trapping
if dynamic hyperinflation occurs. Although this
procedure is supported by limited evidence, it is
unlikely to be harmful in an otherwise desperate
situation.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Dynamic hyperinflation increases transthoracic
impedance.162 Consider the higher shock energies
for defibrillation if initial defibrillation attempts
fail.
There is no good evidence for the use of open-
chest cardiac compressions in patients with asthma-
associated cardiac arrest. Working through the four
Hs and four Ts will identify potentially reversible
courses of asthma related cardiac arrest. Tension
pneumothorax can be difficult to diagnose in car-
diac arrest; it may be indicated by unilateral expan-
sion of the chest wall, shifting of the trachea and
subcutaneous emphysema. Release air from the
pleural space with needle decompression. Insert a
large-gauge cannula in the second intercostal space
in the mid clavicular line, being careful to avoid
direct puncture of the lung. If air is emitted, insert
a chest tube. Always consider bilateral pneumoth-
oraces in asthma-related cardiac arrest.
Post-resuscitation care
The following should be added to usual manage-
ment after ROSC:
• Optimise the medical management of bron-
chospasm.
• Use permissive hypercapnia; it may not be pos-
sible to achieve normal oxygenation and venti-
lation in a patient with severe bronchospasm.
Efforts to achieve normal arterial blood gas val-
ues may worsen lung injury. Mild hypoventilation
reduces the risk of barotraumas, and hypercap-
noea is typically well-tolerated.163 Target lower
arterial blood oxygen saturations (e.g., 90%).
• Provide sedation (neuromuscular paralysis if
needed) and controlled ventilation. Despite the
absence of formal studies, ketamine and inhala-
tional anaesthetics have bronchodilator proper-
ties that may be useful in the asthmatic patient
who is difficult to ventilate.
• Involve a senior critical care doctor early.
7g. Anaphylaxis
Introduction
Anaphylaxis is a rare, but potentially reversible,
cause of cardiac arrest. Although the management
of cardiac arrest secondary to anaphylaxis follows
the general principles described elsewhere in these
guidelines, the pathophysiological processes occur-
ring during anaphylaxis may require additional spe-
cific therapy.
S151
Anaphylaxis is a severe life-threatening, gen-
eralised or systemic hypersensitivity reaction.
Investigations will show whether the reaction
is allergic (immunoglobulin E (IgE) or non IgE
mediated) or non-allergic anaphylaxis. The term
anaphylactoid reaction is no longer used. An ana-
phylactic reaction is generally defined as a severe,
systemic allergic reaction characterized by multi-
system involvement, including the airway, vascular
system, gastrointestinal tract and skin. Severe
cases may cause complete airway obstruction
secondary to laryngeal oedema, bronchospasm,
hypotension, cardiovascular collapse and death.
Other symptoms include rhinitis, conjunctivitis,
abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhoea and a sense
of impending doom. There is also usually a colour
change; the patient may appear either flushed or
pale. Anaphylactic reactions vary in severity, and
progress may be rapid, slow or (unusually) biphasic.
Rarely, manifestations may be delayed (this may
occur with latex allergy), or persist for more than
24 h.
Pathophysiology
Initial exposure to an allergen may trigger an
immune response that sensitises the body to sub-
sequent exposure. This sensitisation results in
antigen-specific IgE bound to the cell membrane of
basophils and mast cells. On repeat exposure, the
antigen is bound by the IgE, triggering release of
a series of inflammatory mediators including his-
tamines, leukotrienes, prostaglandins, thrombox-
anes and bradykinins. These mediators act system-
ically to cause increased mucous membrane secre-
tion, increased capillary permeability and markedly
reduced vascular smooth muscle tone. This causes
the clinical symptoms of angioedema and airway
swelling, bronchospasm, hypotension and cardio-
vascular collapse.
Anaphylaxis is caused by a hypersensitivity reac-
tion in which histamine, serotonin and other
vasoactive substances are released from basophils
and mast cells in response to an IgE-mediated reac-
tion. Antigen-specific immunoglobulins are pro-
duced after initial exposure to an allergen. Sub-
sequent re-exposure to this allergen provokes an
anaphylactic reaction, although many anaphylactic
reactions occur without known previous exposure.
Aetiology
Although anaphylaxis is relatively common, pro-
gression to a severe life-threatening reaction is
rare. Any antigen capable of activating IgE can the-
oretically be a trigger for anaphylaxis. The com-
S152
monest causes of life-threatening reactions are
drugs, stinging insects and food. In as many as 5%
of the cases, the antigen triggering the anaphylaxis
cannot be identified.
Drugs
Neuromuscular blocking drugs (particularly suxam-
ethonium) and antibiotics are the most common
triggers for drug-induced anaphylaxis.164 Aspirin,
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and IV con-
trast agents are also common causes of life-
threatening anaphylaxis.
Latex
Latex, or natural rubber, is a significant trigger of
anaphylaxis among hospitalised patients because of
frequent instrumentation and operations in which
latex products are used. Avoidance is the only
effective therapy, and the availability of latex-free
clinic and hospital environments, including patient
and operating rooms, is now a priority.165 Life-
threatening anaphylactic reactions to latex are very
rare166,167 with a decade-long registry of anaphy-
lactic deaths in England not registering any latex-
associated deaths.168,169
Stinging insects
The prevalence of IgE-mediated systemic reac-
tions to insect stings is 2.8% in temperate
climates, although higher in countries, such as
Australia where exposure to insect stings is more
common.170 The stinging insects belong to the
Hymenoptera order and include hornets, wasps,
honeybees and fire ants. Most stings cause local
reactions with pain and swelling at the site but
progress to anaphylaxis in susceptible persons.
Fatal anaphylaxis occurs in people who are re-stung
after a previous sting has induced IgE antibodies.
Fatal reactions occur within 10—15 min, with car-
diovascular collapse being the commonest cause of
death.168,169,171
Foods
Life-threatening allergic reactions to food are
increasing. Peanuts, seafood (in particular prawns
and shellfish) and wheat are the foods asso-
ciated most frequently with life-threatening
anaphylaxis.172 Bronchospasm, angioedema, air-
way obstruction and asphyxia comprise the most
common fatal mechanism.168,169,171
J. Soar et al.
Signs and symptoms
Anaphylaxis should be considered when two or
more body systems are affected (cutaneous, res-
piratory, cardiovascular, neurological or gastroin-
testinal), with or without cardiovascular or air-
way involvement. Symptoms may be particularly
severe in patients with asthma, those taking beta-
adrenoceptor blockers and during neuraxial anaes-
thesia: states associated with reduced endogenous
catecholamine response. The speed of the onset of
signs and symptoms is related to the likely severity
of the ensuing anaphylaxis.
Early signs and symptoms include urticaria, rhini-
tis, conjunctivitis, abdominal pain, vomiting and
diarrhoea. Flushing is common but pallor may also
occur. Marked upper airway (laryngeal) oedema
and bronchospasm may develop, causing stridor
and wheezing (or high airway pressures in venti-
lated patients). In asthmatics, this may be par-
ticularly severe and difficult to treat. Cardiovas-
cular collapse is the most common peri-arrest
manifestation. Vasodilation causes relative hypo-
volaemia, exacerbated by true volume loss as
increased capillary permeability results in extrava-
sation of intravascular fluid. Additional cardiac dys-
function may follow from underlying disease or
from the development of myocardial ischaemia
from adrenaline administration.168,169,171
Differential diagnosis
The lack of any consistent clinical manifestation
and a wide range of possible presentations may
cause diagnostic difficulty. In each case, take as
full a history and examination as possible. The his-
tory of previous allergic reactions, as well as that
of the recent incident is important. Pay particular
attention to the condition of the skin, the pulse
rate, the blood pressure and the upper airways,
and auscultate the chest. Measure and record the
peak flow where possible. Consider the diagnosis
of other conditions only after anaphylaxis has been
excluded; failure to identify and treat anaphylaxis
can be fatal:173,174
• ACE inhibitors may cause angioedema with
marked swelling of the upper airway. This reac-
tion may occur at any time and is not related to an
initial exposure to the drug. The best treatment
for this form of angioedema is unclear, but early
recognition and appropriate airway management
are critical.175
• Hereditary angioedema is familial and indistin-
guishable from the early angioedema of anaphy-
laxis or drug-related angioedema. An important
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
distinguishing feature is the absence of urticaria
with hereditary angioedema. This is treated with
C1 esterase inhibitor, either as a specific concen-
trate or contained within fresh frozen plasma.
• Severe asthma may present with bronchospasm
and stridor, which are also common features of
severe anaphylaxis. However, asthma attacks do
not usually present with urticaria or angioedema.
• Rarely, panic attacks may be associated with
functional stridor as a result of forced adduction
of the vocal cords. As with asthma, there is no
urticaria, angioedema, hypoxia or hypotension.
• Vasovagal reactions cause sudden collapse and
extreme bradycardia that may be mistaken for
absence of a pulse. Recovery is usually rela-
tively rapid, and is not associated with urticaria,
angioedema or bronchospasm.
Considerations in relation to treatment
Wide variations in aetiology, severity and organ
involvement preclude standardised treatment rec-
ommendations. The lack of clinical trials necessi-
tates guidelines based on consensus opinion.
Adrenaline is generally agreed to be the most
important drug for any severe anaphylactic reac-
tion. As an alpha-agonist, it reverses peripheral
vasodilation and reduces oedema. Its beta-agonist
properties dilate the airways, increase the force of
myocardial contraction and suppress histamine and
leukotriene release.
Adrenaline is most effective when given early
after the onset of the reaction, but it is not without
risk, particularly when given IV. When given intra-
muscularly, adrenaline is very safe. Adverse effects
are extremely rare, and the only patient reported
to have had a myocardial infarction after intra-
muscular injection had numerous risk factors for
coronary disease. Sometimes there has been uncer-
tainty as to whether complications (e.g., myocar-
dial ischaemia) have been due to the effects of the
allergen itself or to adrenaline given as treatment
for it.168,176
Rarely, adrenaline may fail to reverse the clinical
manifestations of anaphylaxis, particularly in late
reactions or in patients treated with beta-blockers.
Other measures then assume greater importance,
particularly volume replacement.
General resuscitation measures
All victims should recline in a position of comfort.
Remove the likely allergen (i.e., stop drug infusion
or blood transfusion). Lying flat, with or without leg
elevation, may be helpful for hypotension but not
helpful for breathing difficulties. Airway obstruc-
S153
tion can develop rapidly due to soft tissue swelling.
Consider early tracheal intubation; delay may make
intubation extremely difficult.
Oxygen
Give high-flow oxygen (10—15 l min−1 ).
Adrenaline
Give adrenaline intramuscularly to all patients with
clinical signs of shock, airway swelling or definite
breathing difficulty; adrenaline will be absorbed
rapidly. Inspiratory stridor, wheeze, cyanosis, pro-
nounced tachycardia and decreased capillary fill-
ing indicate a severe reaction. For adults, give
an IM dose of adrenaline, 0.5 ml of 1:1000 solu-
tion (500 mcg). If the patient’s condition fails to
improve, repeat the dose after about 5 min. In some
cases several doses may be needed, particularly if
improvement is transient. The IM route is prefer-
able to SC administration because absorption is
more rapid in shock.177,178
IV adrenaline (in a dilution of at least 1:10,000;
never 1:1000) is hazardous and must be reserved
for patients with profound shock that is immedi-
ately life threatening and for special indications,
for example during anaesthesia. A further 10-fold
dilution to 1:100,000 adrenaline enables finer titra-
tion of the dose and increases its safety by reducing
the risk of unwanted adverse effects. This should
be carried out with a minimum of electrocardio-
graphic monitoring. Doctors experienced in the use
of IV adrenaline may prefer to use the IV route in
any patient with signs of severe anaphylaxis.
Antihistamine
Give an H1 -antihistamine (e.g., chlorphenamine
10—20 mg) by slow IV injection. Consider also an
H2 -blocker, e.g., ranitidine, 50 mg IV.179
Hydrocortisone
Give hydrocortisone by slow IV injection after
severe attacks to help avert late sequelae. This is
particularly important for asthmatics (who are at an
increased risk of severe or fatal anaphylaxis) if they
have been treated with corticosteroids previously.
Corticosteroids are considered as slow-acting drugs
and may take up to 4—6 h to have an effect, even if
given IV. However, they may help in the emergency
treatment of an acute attack, and they also have
a role in preventing or shortening the protracted
reactions.
S154
Inhaled bronchodilators
An inhaled beta2 agonist, such as salbutamol
(5 mg, repeated if necessary), may help reverse
the refractory bronchospasm. Inhaled ipratropium
(500 mcg, repeated as necessary) may be partic-
ularly useful for the treatment of bronchospasm
in patients on beta-blockers. Some cases of near-
fatal asthma may really be anaphylaxis, resulting
in mistaken overtreatment with conventional bron-
chodilators rather than more specific treatment
with adrenaline.141
Intravenous fluids
If severe hypotension does not respond rapidly to
drug treatment, give fluid; a rapid infusion of 1—2 l
may be required. Further fluid is likely to be nec-
essary.
Potential therapies
Vasopressin. There are case reports that
vasopressin may benefit severely hypotensive
patients.180,181
Atropine. Case reports also suggest that, when
relative or severe bradycardia is present, there may
be a role for atropine.174
Glucagon. For patients unresponsive to
adrenaline, especially those receiving beta-
blockers, glucagon may be effective. This agent
is short-acting (1—2 mg every 5 min IM, or IV).
Nausea, vomiting and hyperglycaemia are common
side effects.
Envenomation
Rarely, insect envenomation by bees, but not
wasps, leaves a venom sac. Immediately scrape
away any insect parts at the site of the sting.182
Squeezing may increase envenomation.
Cardiac arrest
In addition to the ALS drugs, consider the following
therapies.
Rapid fluid resuscitation
Near-fatal anaphylaxis produces profound vasodila-
tion and a relative hypovolaemia. Massive volume
replacement is essential. Use at least two large-
bore cannulae with pressure bags to give large vol-
umes (as much as 4—8 l IV fluid may be necessary in
the immediate resuscitation period).
J. Soar et al.
Antihistamines
Give an antihistamine IV if antihistamine has not
already been given before the arrest.179
Steroids
Steroids given during a cardiac arrest will have little
immediate effect but, if ROSC is restored, they may
be effective in the post-resuscitation period.
Prolonged CPR
Patients with anaphylaxis are often young, with
healthy hearts and cardiovascular systems. Effec-
tive CPR may maintain sufficient oxygen delivery
until the catastrophic effects of the anaphylactic
reaction resolve.
Airway obstruction
Airway obstruction may occur rapidly in severe ana-
phylaxis, particularly in patients with angioedema.
Warning signs are lingual and labial swelling,
hoarseness and oropharyngeal swelling. Consider
early, elective intubation. As airway obstruction
progresses, both LMAs and Combitubes are likely
to be difficult to insert. Tracheal intubation and
cricothyroidotomy will also become increasingly
difficult. Attempts at tracheal intubation may exac-
erbate laryngeal oedema. Early involvement of a
senior anaesthetist is mandatory when managing
these patients.
Observation
Warn patients with even moderate attacks of the
possibility of an early recurrence of symptoms and,
in some circumstances, keep them under observa-
tion for 8—24 h. This caution is particularly applica-
ble to:
• severe reactions with slow onset due to idio-
pathic anaphylaxis;
• reactions in severe asthmatics or with a severe
asthmatic component;
• reactions with the possibility of continuing
absorption of allergen;
• patients with a previous history of biphasic
reactions.179,183—187
A patient who remains symptom-free for 4 h after
treatment may be discharged.188
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Investigations and further management
Measurement of mast cell tryptase may help with
retrospective diagnosis of anaphylaxis.189,190 Take
three 10-ml clotted blood samples:
• immediately after the reaction has been treated;
• about 1 h after reaction;
• about 6 h and up to 24 h after reaction.
It is important to identify the allergen after suc-
cessful resuscitation from anaphylaxis, to prevent
recurrence. Refer the patient to a specialist clinic.
Patients at very high risk of anaphylaxis may carry
their own adrenaline syringe for self-administration
and wear a ‘MedicAlert’ type bracelet. Report reac-
tions to drugs to the appropriate monitoring agency.
7h. Cardiac arrest following cardiac
surgery
Cardiac arrest following major cardiac surgery
(both on and off bypass) is relatively common in the
immediate postoperative phase, with a reported
incidence of 0.7% in the first 24 h191 and 1.4%
within the first 8 days.192 Cardiac arrest is usu-
ally caused by specific pathology that is reversible
if treated promptly and appropriately, and there-
fore, has a relatively high survival rate. Car-
diac arrest is usually preceded by physiological
deterioration,193 although it may occur suddenly
in stable patients.191 Continuous monitoring on the
intensive care unit (ICU) enables immediate inter-
vention at the time of arrest. Survival to hospi-
tal discharge of patients suffering from cardiac
arrest during the first 24 h after adult cardiac
surgery is reported as 54%192 —79%191,194 and 41%
in children.193
Aetiology
Perioperative myocardial infarction is the common-
est cause of sudden cardiac arrest and is often sec-
ondary to graft occlusion.191,192
The main causes of cardiac arrest in the initial
postoperative period include:
• myocardial ischaemia;
• tension pneumothorax;
• haemorrhage causing hypovolaemic shock;
• cardiac tamponade;
• disconnection of pacing system in pacing-
dependent patient;
• electrolyte disturbances (particularly hypo/
hyperkalaemia).
S155
Diagnosis
An immediate decision on the likely cause of car-
diac arrest must be made to enable rapid interven-
tion and successful resuscitation. Auscultation of
the chest, examination of the ECG and chest radio-
graph, transoesophageal/transthoracic echocardio-
graphy and measurement of blood loss from chest
drains will aid in identifying the cause of the arrest.
Actively seek and exclude reversible causes of car-
diac arrest: the four Hs and four Ts. Myocardial
ischaemia often causes myocardial irritability and
progressive hypotension before an arrest. A tension
pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade will cause
progressive hypotension and an increasing central
venous pressure. Increasing airway pressures and
poor air entry in the affected lung will differenti-
ate between the two conditions. Lack of drainage of
blood from the chest drains does not exclude haem-
orrhage or tamponade, because drains may block
with clot.
Treatment
Treatment of cardiac arrest following cardiac
surgery follows the same principles of BLS and
ALS that have already been described in these
guidelines. Seek assistance from experienced clin-
icians without delay. Exclude immediately cor-
rectable causes, such as pacing-lead disconnection
and tension pneumothorax. Extreme bradycardia or
asystole may respond to pacing via internal pacing-
wires (if present) connected to an external pace-
maker. Ensure correction of hypo/hyperkalaemia
and hypomagnesaemia. Rapid restoration of an ade-
quate blood volume is important, ensuring that
haemoglobin levels are maintained no lower than
8.0 g dl−1 . Be careful when giving IV adrenaline, as
the resulting hypertension may cause catastrophic
failure of anastomoses.
External chest compressions
External chest compressions may be necessary but
may cause sternal subluxation, fractured ribs and
damage to grafts. Continuous observation of the
invasive blood pressure will enable the force of
compression to be optimised. Effective external
chest compressions should take precedence over
the concerns of damage to grafts.
Internal cardiac massage
Mechanical factors (e.g., haemorrhage, tampon-
ade, graft occlusion) account for a substantial
proportion of causes of sudden cardiac arrest
S156
occurring in haemodynamically stable patients dur-
ing the immediate postoperative period.191 Correc-
tion of this pathology may require chest reopen-
ing and therefore internal cardiac massage. Up
to 10% of patients may need chest reopening fol-
lowing cardiac surgery.195 Overall survival to dis-
charge the following internal cardiac massage is
17%196 —25%.195 Cardiac arrest on the ICU, arrest
within 24 h of surgery, and reopening within 10 min
of arrest are independent predictors of survival.195
The high incidence of potentially correctable
mechanical causes of arrest, in conjunction with
the high survival rate achieved by open CPR, sup-
ports an early approach to open-chest CPR in these
patients.191,197 Reopen the patient’s chest imme-
diately if there is no output with external chest
compressions or if there is a shockable rhythm
refractory to cardioversion. Management of asys-
tole usually requires prompt chest opening. Open-
ing of the chest is relatively straightforward and,
if indicated, should be undertaken within 10 min of
cardiac arrest. Consider training the non-surgical
medical staff to open the wound and remove ster-
nal wires, while a surgeon is summoned. Make sure
that a chest opening kit is immediately available on
the ICU. The invasive blood pressure will guide the
effectiveness of internal cardiac massage Remove
the blood clot carefully, either manually or by suc-
tioning, to avoid damaging the grafts. Early iden-
tification and treatment of underlying pathology is
challenging under these circumstances and requires
an experienced surgeon.
Reinstitution of emergency cardiopulmonary
bypass
The need for emergency cardiopulmonary bypass
(CPB) may occur in approximately 0.8% patients,
occurring at a mean of 7 h postoperatively,198 and
is usually indicated to correct surgical bleeding or
graft occlusion and rest an exhausted myocardium.
Emergency institution of CPB should be available
on all units undertaking cardiac surgery. Survival to
discharge the rates of 32%,195 42%198 and 56.3%199
have been reported when CPB is reinstituted on the
ICU. Survival rates decline rapidly when this pro-
cedure is undertaken more than 24 h after surgery
and when performed on the ward rather than the
ICU. Emergency CPB should probably be restricted
to patients who arrest within 72 h of surgery, as
surgically remediable problems are unlikely after
this time.195 Ensuring adequate re-anticoagulation
before commencing CPB, or the use of a heparin-
bonded CPB circuit, is important. The need for a
further period of aortic cross-clamping does not
preclude a favourable outcome.198
J. Soar et al.
Internal defibrillation
Internal defibrillation using paddles applied directly
across the ventricles requires considerably less
energy than that used for external defibrillation.
Biphasic shocks are substantially more effective
than the monophasic shocks for direct defibrilla-
tion. For biphasic shocks, starting at 5 J creates
the optimum conditions for lowest threshold and
cumulative energy, whereas 10 or 20 J offers opti-
mum conditions for more rapid defibrillation and
fewer shocks.200 Monophasic shocks require approx-
imately double these energy levels.200
7i. Traumatic cardiorespiratory arrest
Introduction
Cardiac arrest secondary to traumatic injury has
a very high mortality, with an overall survival of
just 2.2% (range, 0—3.7%) (Table 7.4).201—207 In
those who survive, neurological disability is com-
mon, being absent in only 0.8% of those suffering
from traumatic cardiorespiratory arrest (TCRA).
Diagnosis of traumatic cardiorespiratory
arrest
The diagnosis of TCRA is made clinically: the trauma
patient is unresponsive, apnoeic and pulseless. Both
asystole and organised cardiac activity without car-
diac output are regarded as TCRA.
Commotio cordis
Commotio cordis is actual or near cardiac arrest
caused by a blunt impact to the chest wall over
the heart.208—211 A blow on the chest during the
vulnerable phase of the cardiac cycle may cause
malignant arrhythmias (usually VF). Syncope after
chest wall impact may be caused by non-sustained
arrhythmic events. Commotio cordis occurs mostly
during sports (most commonly baseball) and recre-
ational activities, and victims are usually young
males (mean age 14 years). The Commotio Cordis
Registry in Minneapolis is accruing 5—15 cases of
commotio cordis each year. The overall survival rate
from commotio cordis is 15%, but reaches 25% if
resuscitation is started within 3 min.211
Trauma secondary to medical events
A cardiorespiratory arrest caused by a medi-
cal pathology (e.g., cardiac arrhythmia, hypo-
glycaemia, seizure) may precipitate a secondary
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
traumatic event (e.g., fall, road traffic accident,
etc.). Traumatic injuries may not be the primary
cause of a cardiorespiratory arrest.
Mechanism of injury
Blunt trauma
Of 1242 patients with cardiac arrest after blunt
trauma, 19 (1.5%) survived, but only 2 (0.16%) had
a good neurological outcome (Table 7.4).
Penetrating trauma
Of 839 patients with cardiac arrest after pene-
trating injury, there were 16 (1.9%) survivors, of
whom 12 (1.4%) had a good neurological outcome
(Table 7.4).
Signs of life and initial ECG activity
There are no reliable predictors of survival for
TCRA. One study reported that the presence of
reactive pupils and sinus rhythm correlated signif-
icantly with survival.217 In a study of penetrating
trauma, pupil reactivity, respiratory activity and
sinus rhythm were correlated with survival but were
unreliable.207 Three studies reported no survivors
among patients presenting with asystole or agonal
rhythms.202,207,218 Another reported no survivors in
PEA after blunt trauma.219 Based on these studies,
the American College of Surgeons and the National
Association of EMS Physicians produced prehospi-
tal guidelines on withholding resuscitation.220 They
recommend withholding resuscitation in:
• blunt trauma victims presenting apnoeic and
pulseless, and without organised ECG activity;
• penetrating trauma victims found apnoeic and
pulseless after rapid assessment for signs of life,
such as pupillary reflexes, spontaneous move-
ment or organised ECG activity.
A recent retrospective study questions these
recommendations: in a series of 184 TCRA vic-
tims, several survivors met the criteria for non-
resuscitation.221
Treatment
Survival from TCRA is correlated with duration of
CPR and prehospital time.205,222—226 Prolonged CPR
is associated with a poor outcome; the maximum
CPR time associated with a favourable outcome is
16 min.205,222—224 The level of prehospital interven-
tion will depend on the skills of local EMS providers,
S157
but treatment on scene should focus on good qual-
ity BLS and ALS and exclusion of reversible causes.
Look for and treat any medical condition that may
have precipitated the trauma event. Undertake
only the essential lifesaving interventions on scene
and, if the patient has signs of life, transfer rapidly
to the nearest appropriate hospital. Consider on-
scene thoracostomy for appropriate patients.227,228
Do not delay for unproven interventions, such as
spinal immobilisation.229
Resuscitative thoracotomy
Prehospital. Resuscitative thoracotomy has been
reported as futile if out-of-hospital time has
exceeded 30 min;225 others consider thoracotomy
to be futile in patients with blunt trauma requiring
more than 5 min of prehospital CPR and in patients
with penetrating trauma requiring more than 15 min
of CPR.226 With these time limits in mind, one UK
service recommends that, if surgical intervention
cannot be accomplished within 10 min after loss
of pulse in patients with penetrating chest injury,
on-scene thoracotomy should be considered.227
Following this approach, of 39 patients who
underwent thoracotomy at scene, 4 patients sur-
vived and 3 of these made a good neurological
recovery.
Hospital. A relatively simple technique for
resuscitative thoracotomy has been described
recently.228,230 The American College of Surgeons
has published practice guidelines for emergency
department thoracotomy (EDT) based on a meta-
analysis of 42 outcome studies including 7035
EDTs.231 The overall survival rate was 7.8%, and
of 226 survivors (5%), only 34 (15%) exhibited a
neurological deficit. The investigators concluded
the following:
• After blunt trauma, EDT should be limited to
those with vital signs on arrival and a witnessed
cardiac arrest (estimated survival rate 1.6%).
• Emergency department thoracotomy is best
applied to patients with penetrating cardiac
injuries, who arrive at the trauma centre after
short on-scene and transport times, with wit-
nessed signs of life or ECG activity (estimated
survival rate 31%).
• Emergency department thoracotomy should be
undertaken in penetrating non-cardiac thoracic
injuries even though survival rates are low.
• Emergency department thoracotomy should be
undertaken in patients with exsanguinating
abdominal vascular injury even though survival
rates are low. This procedure should be used as
S158 J. Soar et al.

Table 7.4 Survival after traumatic cardiac arrest

Source Entry criteria Number of survivors Number of survivors of Number of survivors
neurologically intact penetrating trauma of blunt trauma
neurologically intact neurologically intact
Bouillon212 Pulseless, requiring 224
CPR at scene 4
3
Battistella202 Pulseless, requiring 604 300 304
CPR at scene, en route 16 12 4
or in ED 9 9 0
Pasquale206 CPR before or on 106 21 85
hospital admission 3 1 2
Fisher213 Children requiring CPR 65 38
before or on admission 1 1
after blunt trauma 0 0
Hazinski214 Children requiring CPR 38 65
or being severely 1 1
hypotensive on 0 0
admission after blunt
trauma
Shimazu203 TCRA on admission 267
7
4

Calkins215 Children requiring CPR 25 25

after blunt trauma 2 2
2 2
Yanagawa216 OHCA in blunt trauma 332 332
6 6
0 0
Rosemurgy201 CPR before admission 138 42 96
0 0 0
0 0 0
Stratton207 Unconscious, pulseless 879 497 382
at scene 9 4 5
3 3 0
Cera217 CPR on admission 161
15
?
For each study, the first number indicates the number of patients in cardiac arrest, the second indicates the numbers of sur-
vivors and the third indicates the number of survivors with a good neurological outcome. CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
ED = emergency department; TCRA = traumatic cardiorespiratory arrest; OHCA = out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

an adjunct to definitive repair of abdominal vas-
cular injury.
Airway management
Effective airway management is essential to main-
tain oxygenation of the severely compromised
trauma victim. In one study, tracheal intubation on-
scene of patients with TCRA doubled the tolerated
period of CPR, i.e., the mean time of CPR for sur-
vivors who were intubated in the field was 9.1 min
versus 4.2 min for those who were not intubated.224
Tracheal intubation of trauma victims is a dif-
ficult procedure with a high failure rate if car-
ried out by less experienced care providers.232—235
Use the basic airway management manoeuvres and
alternative airways to maintain oxygenation if tra-
cheal intubation cannot be accomplished immedi-
ately. If these measures fail, a surgical airway is
indicated.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Ventilation
In low cardiac output states positive pressure ven-
tilation causes further circulatory depression, or
even cardiac arrest, by impeding venous return to
the heart.236 Monitor ventilation with capnome-
try and adjust to achieve normocapnia. This may
enable slow respiratory rates and low tidal volumes,
and the corresponding decrease in transpulmonary
pressure may increase venous return and cardiac
output.
Chest decompression
Effective decompression of a tension pneumothorax
can be achieved quickly by lateral thoracostomy,
which is likely to be more effective than needle
thoracostomy and quicker than inserting a chest
tube.237
Effectiveness of chest compressions in TCRA
In hypovolaemic cardiac arrest or cardiac tam-
ponade, chest compressions are unlikely to be as
effective as in cardiac arrest from other causes;238
nonetheless, return of spontaneous circulation with
ALS in patients with TCRA is well described. Chest
compressions are still the standard of care in
patients with cardiac arrest, irrespective of aeti-
ology.
Haemorrhage control
Early haemorrhage control is vital. Handle the
patient gently at all times, to prevent clot disrup-
tion. Apply external compression and pelvic and
limb splints when appropriate. Delays in surgical
haemostasis are disastrous for patients with exsan-
guinating trauma.
Pericardiocentesis
In patients with suspected trauma-related cardiac
tamponade, needle pericardiocentesis is probably
not a useful procedure.239 There is no evidence
of benefit in the literature. It may increase scene
time, cause myocardial injury and delay effective
therapeutic measures, such as emergency thoraco-
tomy.
Fluids and blood transfusion on scene
Fluid resuscitation of trauma victims before haem-
orrhage is controlled is controversial, and there is
no clear consensus on when it should be started
and what fluids should be given.240 Limited evi-
dence and general consensus support a more con-
S159
servative approach to IV fluid infusion, with per-
missive hypotension until surgical haemostasis is
achieved.241,242 In the UK, the National Institute for
Clinical Excellence (NICE) has published guidelines
on prehospital fluid replacement in trauma.243 The
recommendations include giving 250 ml boluses of
crystalloid solution until a radial pulse is achieved,
and not delaying rapid transport of trauma victims
for fluid infusion in the field. Prehospital fluid ther-
apy may have a role in prolonged entrapments, but
there is no reliable evidence for this.244,245
Ultrasound
Ultrasound is a valuable tool in the evaluation of the
compromised trauma victim. Haemoperitoneum,
haemo- or pneumothorax and cardiac tamponade
can be diagnosed reliably in minutes even in the
prehospital phase.246 Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
and needle pericardiocentesis have virtually disap-
peared from clinical practice since the introduction
of sonography in trauma care. Prehospital ultra-
sound is now available, although its benefits are yet
to be proven.
Vasopressors
The possible role of vasopressors (e.g., vasopressin)
in trauma resuscitation is unclear and is based
mainly on case reports.247
7j. Cardiac arrest associated with
pregnancy
Overview
Mortality related to pregnancy in developed coun-
tries is rare, occurring in an estimated 1:30,000
deliveries.248 The fetus must always be considered
when an adverse cardiovascular event occurs in a
pregnant woman. Resuscitation guidelines for preg-
nancy are based largely on case series and scientific
rationale. Most reports address the causes in devel-
oped countries, whereas the majority of pregnancy-
related deaths occur in the developing world.
Significant physiological changes occur during
pregnancy, e.g., cardiac output, blood volume,
minute ventilation and oxygen consumption all
increase. Furthermore, the gravid uterus may cause
significant compression of iliac and abdominal ves-
sels when the mother is in the supine position,
resulting in reduced cardiac output and hypoten-
sion.
S160
Causes
There are many causes of cardiac arrest in pregnant
women. A review of nearly 2 million pregnancies in
the UK248 showed that maternal death was associ-
ated with:
• pre-existing cardiac disease;
• thromboembolism;
• suicide;
• hypertensive disorders of pregnancy;
• sepsis;
• ectopic pregnancy;
• haemorrhage;
• amniotic fluid embolism;
Pregnant women can also suffer the same causes
of cardiac arrest as women of the same age
group.
Key interventions to prevent cardiac arrest
In an emergency, use an ABCDE approach. Many
cardiovascular problems associated with pregnancy
are caused by caval compression. Treat a distressed
or compromised pregnant patient as follows:
• Place the patient in the left lateral position or
manually and gently displace the uterus to the
left.
• Give 100% oxygen.
• Give a fluid bolus.
• Immediately re-evaluate the need for any drugs
being given.
• Seek expert help early.
Modifications to BLS guidelines for cardiac
arrest
After 20 weeks’ gestation, the pregnant woman’s
uterus can press down against the inferior vena cava
and the aorta, impeding venous return and cardiac
output. Uterine obstruction of venous return can
cause pre-arrest hypotension or shock and, in the
critically ill patient, may precipitate arrest.249,250
After cardiac arrest, the compromise in venous
return and cardiac output by the gravid uterus
limit the effectiveness of chest compressions. Non-
cardiac arrest data show that the gravid uterus can
be shifted away from the cava in most cases by
placing the patient in 15 degrees of left lateral
decubitus position.251 Tilt may be accomplished by
manual or mechanical means. There is no evidence
to guide the hand position for optimum chest com-
pressions in the pregnant patient. A hand position
higher than the normal position for chest compres-
sion may be needed to adjust for the elevation
J. Soar et al.
of the diaphragm and abdominal contents caused
by the gravid uterus. Attempt defibrillation using
standard energy doses.252 There is no evidence
that shocks from a direct current defibrillator have
adverse effects on the fetal heart. Left lateral tilt
and large breasts will make it difficult to place an
apical defibrillator paddle. Adhesive defibrillator
pads are preferable to paddles in pregnancy.
Modifications to advanced life support
There is a greater potential for gastro-oesophageal
sphincter insufficiency and risk of pulmonary aspi-
ration of gastric contents. Early tracheal intubation
with correctly applied cricoid pressure decreases
this risk. Tracheal intubation will make ventilation
of the lungs easier in the presence of increased
intra-abdominal pressure.
A tracheal tube 0.5—1 mm internal diameter (ID)
smaller than that used for a non-pregnant woman
of similar size may be necessary because of mater-
nal airway narrowing from oedema and swelling.253
Tracheal intubation may be more difficult in the
pregnant patient.254 Expert help, a failed intuba-
tion drill and the use of alternative airway devices
may be needed (see section 4d).255
Reversible causes
Rescuers should attempt to identify common and
reversible causes of cardiac arrest in pregnancy
during resuscitation attempts. The 4 Hs and 4 Ts
approach helps to identify all the common causes of
cardiac arrest in pregnancy. Pregnant patients are
at risk of all the other causes of cardiac arrest for
their age group (e.g., anaphylaxis, drug overdose,
trauma). Consider the use of abdominal ultrasound
by a skilled operator to detect pregnancy and possi-
ble causes during cardiac arrest in pregnancy; how-
ever, do not delay other treatments. Specific causes
of cardiac arrest in pregnancy include the follow-
ing:
Haemorrhage
Life-threatening haemorrhage can occur both
antenatally and postnatally. Associations include
ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, placenta
praevia and uterine rupture.248 A massive haem-
orrhage protocol must be available in all units and
should be updated and rehearsed regularly in con-
junction with the blood bank. Women at high risk of
bleeding should be delivered in centres with facili-
ties for blood transfusion, intensive care and other
interventions, and plans should be made in advance
for their management. Treatment is based on an
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
ABCDE approach. The key step is to stop the bleed-
ing. Consider the following:
• fluid resuscitation including use of rapid transfu-
sion system and cell salvage;256
• correction of coagulopathy. There may be a role
for recombinant Factor VIIa;257
• oxytocin and prostaglandins to correct uterine
atony;258
• uterine compression sutures;259
• radiological embolisation;260
• hysterectomy;
• aortic cross-clamping in catastrophic haemo-
rrhage.261
Drugs
Iatrogenic overdose is possible in eclamptic women
receiving magnesium sulphate, particularly if the
woman becomes oliguric. Give calcium to treat
magnesium toxicity (see life-threatening elec-
trolyte abnormalities).
Central neural blockade for analgesia or anaes-
thesia may cause problems due to sympathetic
blockade (hypotension, bradycardia) or local anaes-
thetic toxicity.262
Cardiovascular disease
Pulmonary hypertension causes most deaths from
congenital heart disease. Peripartum cardiomyopa-
thy, myocardial infarction and aneurysm or dissec-
tion of the aorta or its branches cause most deaths
from acquired cardiac disease.263,264 Patients with
known cardiac disease need to be managed in a spe-
cialist unit. Pregnant women with coronary artery
disease may suffer an acute coronary syndrome.
Percutaneous coronary intervention is the reperfu-
sion strategy of choice for ST-elevation myocardial
infarction in pregnancy because fibrinolytics are
relatively contraindicated.265
Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
Eclampsia is defined as the development of convul-
sions and/or unexplained coma during pregnancy or
postpartum in patients with signs and symptoms of
pre-eclampsia.266,267 Magnesium sulphate is effec-
tive in preventing approximately half of the cases
of eclampsia developing in labour or immediately
postpartum in women with pre-eclampsia.
Life-threatening pulmonary embolism
Successful use of fibrinolytics for massive, life-
threatening pulmonary embolism in pregnant
women has been reported.268—271
S161
Amniotic fluid embolism
Amniotic fluid embolism may present with breath-
lessness, cyanosis, arrhythmias, hypotension and
haemorrhage associated with disseminated intra-
vascular coagulopathy.272 Presentation is variable
and may be similar to anaphylaxis. Treatment is
supportive, as there is no specific therapy. Suc-
cessful use of cardiopulmonary bypass for women
suffering life-threatening amniotic fluid embolism
during labour and delivery is reported.273
If immediate resuscitation attempts fail
Consider the need for an emergency hysterotomy
or Caesarean section as soon as a pregnant woman
goes into cardiac arrest. In some circumstances
immediate resuscitation attempts will restore a
perfusing rhythm; in early pregnancy this may
enable the pregnancy to proceed to term. When
initial resuscitation attempts fail, delivery of
the fetus may improve the chances of successful
resuscitation of the mother and fetus.274—276 The
best survival rate for infants over 24—25 weeks’
gestation occurs when delivery of the infant is
achieved within 5 min after the mother’s cardiac
arrest.274,277—279 This requires that the provider
commence the hysterotomy at about 4 min after
cardiac arrest. Delivery will relieve caval compres-
sion and improve chances of maternal resuscita-
tion. The Caesarean delivery also enables access
to the infant so that newborn resuscitation can
begin.
Decision-making for emergency hysterotomy
Consider gestational age. The gravid uterus
reaches a size that will begin to compromise aorto-
caval blood flow at approximately 20 weeks’ ges-
tation; however, fetal viability begins at approx-
imately 24—25 weeks. Portable ultrasounds are
available in some emergency departments and may
aid in determination of gestational age (in expe-
rienced hands) and positioning, provided their use
does not delay the decision to perform emergency
hysterotomy.280
• At gestational age <20 weeks, urgent Caesarean
delivery need not be considered, because a
gravid uterus of this size is unlikely to signifi-
cantly compromise maternal cardiac output.
• At gestational age approximately 20—23 weeks,
initiate emergency hysterotomy to enable suc-
cessful resuscitation of the mother, not survival
S162
of the delivered infant, which is unlikely at this
gestational age.
• At gestational age approximately ≥24—25 weeks,
initiate emergency hysterotomy to save the life
of both the mother and the infant.
Planning for emergencies. Advanced life support
in pregnancy requires coordination of maternal
resuscitation, Caesarean delivery of the fetus and
newborn resuscitation within 5 min. To achieve this,
units likely to deal with cardiac arrest in pregnancy
should:
• have plans and equipment for resuscitation of
both the pregnant woman and newborn in place;
• ensure early involvement of obstetric and neona-
tal teams;
• ensure regular training in obstetric emergencies.
7k. Electrocution
Introduction
Electrical injury is a relatively infrequent but
potentially devastating multisystem injury with
high morbidity and mortality, causing 0.54 deaths
per 100,000 people each year. Most electrical
injuries in adults occur in the workplace and are
associated generally with high voltage, whereas
children are at risk primarily at home, where the
voltage is lower (220 V in Europe, Australia and Asia;
110 V in the USA and Canada).281 Electrocution from
lightning strikes is rare, but worldwide it causes
1000 deaths each year.282
Electric shock injuries are caused by the direct
effects of current on cell membranes and vascular
smooth muscle. The thermal energy associated with
high-voltage electrocution will also cause burns.
Factors influencing the severity of electrical injury
include whether the current is alternating (AC) or
direct (DC), voltage, magnitude of energy deliv-
ered, resistance to current flow, pathway of current
through the patient, and the area and duration of
contact. Skin resistance is decreased by moisture,
which increases the likelihood of injury. Electric
current follows the path of least resistance; con-
ductive neurovascular bundles within limbs are par-
ticularly prone to damage.
Contact with AC may cause tetanic contraction
of skeletal muscle, which may prevent release from
the source of electricity. Myocardial or respiratory
failure may cause immediate death.
• Respiratory arrest may be caused by paralysis of
the central respiratory control system or the res-
piratory muscles.
J. Soar et al.
• Current may precipitate ventricular fibrillation
(VF) if it traverses the myocardium during
the vulnerable period (analogous to an R-on-
T phenomenon).283 Electrical current may also
cause myocardial ischaemia because of coronary
artery spasm. Asystole may be primary, or sec-
ondary to asphyxia following respiratory arrest.
Current that traverses the myocardium is more
likely to be fatal. A transthoracic (hand-to-hand)
pathway is more likely to be fatal than a vertical
(hand-to-foot) or straddle (foot-to-foot) pathway.
There may be extensive tissue destruction along the
current pathway.
Lightning strike
Lightning strikes deliver as much as 300 kilo-
volts over a few ms. Most of the current from
a lightning strike passes over the surface of the
body in a process called ‘external flashover’. Both
industrial shocks and lightning strikes cause deep
burns at the point of contact. For industry the
points of contact are usually on the upper limbs,
hands and wrists, whereas for lightning they are
mostly on the head, neck and shoulders. Injury
may also occur indirectly through ground current
or current ‘splashing’ from a tree or other object
that is hit by lightning.284 Explosive force may
cause blunt trauma.285 The pattern and severity
of injury from a lightning strike varies consider-
ably, even among affected individuals from a sin-
gle group.286—288 As with industrial and domestic
electric shock, death is caused by cardiac287—291 or
respiratory arrest.284,292 In those who survive the
initial shock, extensive catecholamine release or
autonomic stimulation may occur, causing hyper-
tension, tachycardia, non-specific ECG changes
(including prolongation of the QT interval and tran-
sient T-wave inversion), and myocardial necrosis.
Creatine kinase may be released from myocardial
and skeletal muscle. Lightning can also cause cen-
tral and peripheral nerve damage; brain haemor-
rhage and oedema, and peripheral nerve injury are
common. Mortality from lightning injuries is as high
as 30%, with up to 70% of survivors sustaining sig-
nificant morbidity.293—295
Diagnosis
The circumstances surrounding the incident are not
always known. Unconscious patients with linear or
punctuate burns or feathering should be treated as
a victims of lightning strike.284
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Rescue
Ensure that any power source is switched off and
do not approach the casualty until it is safe.
High voltage (above domestic mains) electricity
can arc and conduct through the ground for up
to a few metres around the casualty. It is safe
to approach and handle casualties after lightning
strike, although it would be wise to move to a safer
environment, particularly if lightning has been seen
within 30 min.284
Resuscitation
Start standard basic and advanced life support with-
out delay.
• Airway management may be difficult if there are
electrical burns around the face and neck. Early
tracheal intubation is needed in these cases, as
extensive soft-tissue oedema may develop caus-
ing airway obstruction. Head and spine trauma
can occur after electrocution. Immobilise the
spine until evaluation can be performed.
• Muscular paralysis, especially after high voltage,
may persist for several hours;294 ventilatory sup-
port is required during this period.
• VF is the commonest initial arrhythmia after high-
voltage AC shock; treat with prompt attempted
defibrillation. Asystole is more common after DC
shock; use standard protocols for this and other
arrhythmias.
• Remove smouldering clothing and shoes to pre-
vent further thermal injury.
• Vigorous fluid therapy is required if there is
significant tissue destruction. Maintain a good
urine output to enhance the excretion of myo-
globin, potassium and other products of tissue
damage.291
• Consider early surgical intervention in patients
with severe thermal injuries.
• Maintain spinal immobilisation if there is a likeli-
hood of head or neck trauma.296,297
• Conduct a thorough secondary survey to exclude
traumatic injuries caused by tetanic muscular
contraction or by the person being thrown.297,298
• Electrocution can cause severe, deep soft-tissue
injury with relatively minor skin wounds, because
current tends to follow neurovascular bundles;
look carefully for features of compartment syn-
drome, which will necessitate fasciotomy.
Patients struck by lightning are most likely to
die if they suffer immediate cardiac or respiratory
arrest and are not treated rapidly. When multi-
ple victims are struck simultaneously by lightning,
rescuers should give highest priority to patients
S163
in respiratory or cardiac arrest. Victims with res-
piratory arrest may require only ventilation to
avoid secondary hypoxic cardiac arrest. Resusci-
tative attempts may have higher success rates
in lightning victims than in patients with car-
diac arrest from other causes, and efforts may
be effective even when the interval before the
resuscitative attempt is prolonged.292 Dilated or
non-reactive pupils should never be used as a prog-
nostic sign, particularly in patients suffering a light-
ning strike.284
There are conflicting reports on the vulnerability
of the fetus to electric shock. The clinical spec-
trum of electrical injury ranges from a transient
unpleasant sensation for the mother with no effect
on her fetus, to fetal death either immediately or
a few days later. Several factors, such as the mag-
nitude of the current and the duration of contact,
are thought to affect outcome.299
Further treatment and prognosis
Immediate resuscitation in young victims of cardiac
arrest due to electrocution can result in survival.
Successful resuscitation has been reported after
prolonged life support. All those who survive elec-
trical injury should be monitored in hospital if they
have a history of cardiorespiratory problems or have
suffered:
• loss of consciousness;
• cardiac arrest;
• electrocardiographic abnormalities;
• soft-tissue damage and burns.
Severe burns (thermal or electrical), myocar-
dial necrosis, the extent of central nervous sys-
tem injury, and secondary multisystem organ failure
determine the morbidity and long-term prognosis.
There is no specific therapy for electrical injury,
and the management is symptomatic. Prevention
remains the best way to minimise the prevalence
and severity of electrical injury.
References
1. Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus
on Science. Part 8: Advanced challenges in resuscitation.
Section 1. Life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities. Cir-
culation 2000;102:I-122—217.
2. Niemann JT, Cairns CB. Hyperkalemia and ionized hypocal-
cemia during cardiac arrest and resuscitation: possible cul-
prits for postcountershock arrhythmias? Ann Emerg Med
1999;34:1—7.
3. Ahmed J, Weisberg LS. Hyperkalemia in dialysis patients.
Semin Dial 2001;14:348—56.
S164
4. Mahoney B, Smith W, Lo D, Tsoi K, Tonelli M, Clase C. Emer-
gency interventions for hyperkalaemia. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2005. CD003235.
5. Ngugi NN, McLigeyo SO, Kayima JK. Treatment of
hyperkalaemia by altering the transcellular gradient in
patients with renal failure: effect of various therapeutic
approaches. East Afr Med J 1997;74:503—9.
6. Allon M, Shanklin N. Effect of bicarbonate administration
on plasma potassium in dialysis patients: interactions with
insulin and albuterol. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;28:508—14.
7. Rastegar A, Soleimani M. Hypokalaemia and hyper-
kalaemia. Postgrad Med J 2001;77:759—64.
8. Cohn JN, Kowey PR, Whelton PK, Prisant LM. New guide-
lines for potassium replacement in clinical practice: a con-
temporary review by the National Council on Potassium in
Clinical Practice. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2429—36.
9. Litovitz TL, Felberg L, White S, Klein-Schwartz W. 1995
annual report of the American Association of Poison Control
Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg
Med 1996;14:487—537.
10. McCaig LF, Burt CW. Poisoning-related visits to emergency
departments in the United States, 1993—1996. J Toxicol
Clin Toxicol 1999;37:817—26.
11. Fingerhut LA, Cox CS. Poisoning mortality, 1985—1995. Pub-
lic Health Rep 1998;113:218—33.
12. Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Klein-Schwartz W, et al. 2003
annual report of the American Association of Poison Control
Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg
Med 2004;22:335—404.
13. Zimmerman JL. Poisonings and overdoses in the intensive
care unit: general and specific management issues. Crit
Care Med 2003;31:2794—801.
14. Suntres ZE. Role of antioxidants in paraquat toxicity. Toxi-
cology 2002;180:65—77.
15. Facility assessment guidelines for regional toxicology treat-
ment centers. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology. J
Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1993;31:211—7.
16. Poison information and treatment systems. American Col-
lege of Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:384.
17. Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. Position
paper: single-dose activated charcoal. Clin Toxicol (Phila)
2005;43:61—87.
18. Vale JA, Kulig K. Position paper: gastric lavage. J Toxicol
Clin Toxicol 2004;42:933—43.
19. Krenzelok EP. Ipecac syrup-induced emesis.. no evidence
of benefit. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005;43:11—2.
20. Position paper: cathartics. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol
2004;42:243—53.
21. Position paper: whole bowel irrigation. J Toxicol Clin Toxi-
col 2004;42:843—54.
22. Proudfoot AT, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA. Position Paper on urine
alkalinization. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004;42:1—26.
23. Golper TA, Bennett WM. Drug removal by continuous
arteriovenous haemofiltration. A review of the evidence
in poisoned patients. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp
1988;3:341—9.
24. Pitetti RD, Singh S, Pierce MC. Safe and efficacious use of
procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists
in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc
Med 2003;157:1090—6.
25. Osterwalder JJ. Naloxone — for intoxications with intra-
venous heroin and heroin mixtures — harmless or haz-
ardous? A prospective clinical study. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol
1996;34:409—16.
26. Sporer KA, Firestone J, Isaacs SM. Out-of-hospital treat-
ment of opioid overdoses in an urban setting. Acad Emerg
Med 1996;3:660—7.
J. Soar et al.
27. Wanger K, Brough L, Macmillan I, Goulding J, MacPhail I,
Christenson JM. Intravenous vs. subcutaneous naloxone for
out-of-hospital management of presumed opioid overdose.
Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:293—9.
28. Hasan RA, Benko AS, Nolan BM, Campe J, Duff J, Zureikat
GY. Cardiorespiratory effects of naloxone in children. Ann
Pharmacother 2003;37:1587—92.
29. Sporer KA. Acute heroin overdose. Ann Intern Med
1999;130:584—90.
30. Schneir AB, Vadeboncoeur TF, Offerman SR, et al. Massive
oxycontin ingestion refractory to naloxone therapy. Ann
Emerg Med 2002;40:425—8.
31. Kelly AM, Kerr D, Dietze P, Patrick I, Walker T, Koutsogian-
nis Z. Randomised trial of intranasal versus intramuscular
naloxone in prehospital treatment for suspected opioid
overdose. Med J Aust 2005;182:24—7.
32. Brown TC. Sodium bicarbonate treatment for tricyclic
antidepressant arrhythmias in children. Med J Aust
1976;2:380—2.
33. Hoffman JR, Votey SR, Bayer M, Silver L. Effect of hyper-
tonic sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of moderate-
to-severe cyclic antidepressant overdose. Am J Emerg Med
1993;11:336—41.
34. Knudsen K, Abrahamsson J. Epinephrine and sodium bicar-
bonate independently and additively increase survival
in experimental amitriptyline poisoning. Crit Care Med
1997;25:669—74.
35. Nattel S, Mittleman M. Treatment of ventricular tach-
yarrhythmias resulting from amitriptyline toxicity in dogs.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984;231:430—5.
36. Nattel S, Keable H, Sasyniuk BI. Experimental amitriptyline
intoxication: electrophysiologic manifestations and man-
agement. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1984;6:83—9.
37. Pentel P, Benowitz N. Efficacy and mechanism of action of
sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of desipramine toxi-
city in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984;230:12—9.
38. Brown TC, Barker GA, Dunlop ME, Loughnan PM. The
use of sodium bicarbonate in the treatment of tri-
cyclic antidepressant-induced arrhythmias. Anaesth Inten-
sive Care 1973;1:203—10.
39. Brown TC. Tricyclic antidepressant overdosage: experimen-
tal studies on the management of circulatory complica-
tions. Clin Toxicol 1976;9:255—72.
40. Hedges JR, Baker PB, Tasset JJ, Otten EJ, Dalsey WC,
Syverud SA. Bicarbonate therapy for the cardiovascular tox-
icity of amitriptyline in an animal model. J Emerg Med
1985;3:253—60.
41. Sasyniuk BI, Jhamandas V, Valois M. Experimental
amitriptyline intoxication: treatment of cardiac toxicity
with sodium bicarbonate. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:1052—9.
42. Stone CK, Kraemer CM, Carroll R, Low R. Does a sodium-
free buffer affect QRS width in experimental amitriptyline
overdose? Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:58—64.
43. McCabe JL, Cobaugh DJ, Menegazzi JJ, Fata J. Exper-
imental tricyclic antidepressant toxicity: a randomized,
controlled comparison of hypertonic saline solution,
sodium bicarbonate, and hyperventilation. Ann Emerg Med
1998;32:329—33.
44. Sasyniuk BI, Jhamandas V. Mechanism of reversal of
toxic effects of amitriptyline on cardiac Purkinje
fibers by sodium bicarbonate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
1984;231:387—94.
45. Sasyniuk BI, Jhamandas V. Frequency-dependent effects of
amitriptyline on Vmax in canine Purkinje fibers and its alter-
ation by alkalosis. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 1986;29:73—5.
46. Bou-Abboud E, Nattel S. Molecular mechanisms of the
reversal of imipramine-induced sodium channel blockade
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
by alkalinization in human cardiac myocytes. Cardiovasc
Res 1998;38:395—404.
47. Levitt MA, Sullivan Jr JB, Owens SM, Burnham L, Finley
PR. Amitriptyline plasma protein binding: effect of plasma
pH and relevance to clinical overdose. Am J Emerg Med
1986;4:121—5.
48. McKinney PE, Rasmussen R. Reversal of severe tricyclic
antidepressant-induced cardiotoxicity with intravenous
hypertonic saline solution. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:20—4.
49. Brogan WCI, Lange RA, Kim AS, Moliterno DJ, Hillis LD.
Alleviation of cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction
by nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:581—6.
50. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy Jr CW, et al. Cocaine-
induced coronary-artery vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med
1989;321:1557—62.
51. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Flores ED, et al. Potentiation
of cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction by beta-
adrenergic blockade. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:897—903.
52. Boehrer JD, Moliterno DJ, Willard JE, Hillis LD, Lange RA.
Influence of labetalol on cocaine-induced coronary vaso-
constriction in humans. Am J Med 1993;94:608—10.
53. Bosse GM, Pope TM. Recurrent digoxin overdose and treat-
ment with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments. J
Emerg Med 1994;12:179—85.
54. Eddleston M, Rajapakse S, Rajakanthan, et al. Anti-digoxin
Fab fragments in cardiotoxicity induced by ingestion of
yellow oleander: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
2000;355:967—72.
55. Dasgupta A, Szelei-Stevens KA. Neutralization of free
digoxin-like immunoreactive components of oriental
medicines Dan Shen and Lu-Shen-Wan by the Fab frag-
ment of antidigoxin antibody (Digibind). Am J Clin Pathol
2004;121:276—81.
56. Bailey B. Glucagon in beta-blocker and calcium channel
blocker overdoses: a systematic review. J Toxicol Clin Tox-
icol 2003;41:595—602.
57. Dewitt CR, Waksman JC. Pharmacology, pathophysiology
and management of calcium channel blocker and beta-
blocker toxicity. Toxicol Rev 2004;23:223—38.
58. Wax PM, Erdman AR, Chyka PA, et al. beta-blocker inges-
tion: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-
hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005;43:131—46.
59. Peden MM, McGee K. The epidemiology of drowning world-
wide. Inj Control Saf Promot 2003;10:195—9.
60. Driscoll TR, Harrison JA, Steenkamp M. Review of the role
of alcohol in drowning associated with recreational aquatic
activity. Inj Prev 2004;10:107—13.
61. Papa L, Hoelle R, Idris A. Systematic review of definitions
for drowning incidents. Resuscitation 2005;65:255—64.
62. Idris AH, Berg RA, Bierens J, et al. Recommended guidelines
for uniform reporting of data from drowning: The ‘‘Utstein
style’’. Resuscitation 2003;59:45—57.
63. Watson RS, Cummings P, Quan L, Bratton S, Weiss NS. Cer-
vical spine injuries among submersion victims. J Trauma
2001;51:658—62.
64. Dodd FM, Simon E, McKeown D, Patrick MR. The effect of a
cervical collar on the tidal volume of anaesthetised adult
patients. Anaesthesia 1995;50:961—3.
65. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation 2005.
International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treat-
ment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2005;67:157—341.
66. Golden FS, Hervey GR, Tipton MJ. Circum-rescue col-
lapse: collapse, sometimes fatal, associated with rescue
of immersion victims. J R Nav Med Serv 1991;77:139—
49.
S165
67. Goh SH, Low BY. Drowning and near-drowning—–some
lessons learnt. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999;28:183—8.
68. Quan L, Wentz KR, Gore EJ, Copass MK. Outcome and
predictors of outcome in pediatric submersion victims
receiving prehospital care in King County. Wash Pediatr
1990;86:586—93.
69. Szpilman D, Soares M. In-water resuscitation—–is it worth-
while? Resuscitation 2004;63:25—31.
70. Perkins GD. In-water resuscitation: a pilot evaluation.
Resuscitation 2005;65:321—4.
71. Rosen P, Stoto M, Harley J. The use of the Heimlich maneu-
ver in near-drowning: Institute of Medicine report. J Emerg
Med 1995;13:397—405.
72. March NF, Matthews RC. New techniques in external car-
diac compressions. Aquatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
JAMA 1980;244:1229—32.
73. March NF, Matthews RC. Feasibility study of CPR in the
water. Undersea Biomed Res 1980;7:141—8.
74. Thomas R, Cahill CJ. Successful defibrillation in profound
hypothermia (core body temperature 25.6 degrees C).
Resuscitation 2000;47:317—20.
75. Manolios N, Mackie I. Drowning and near-drowning on Aus-
tralian beaches patrolled by life-savers: a 10-year study,
1973—1983. Med J Aust 1988;148:165—7, 70—71.
76. Modell JH, Calderwood HW, Ruiz BC, Downs JB, Chap-
man Jr R. Effects of ventilatory patterns on arterial oxy-
genation after near-drowning in sea water. Anesthesiology
1974;40:376—84.
77. Golden FS, Tipton MJ, Scott RC. Immersion, near-drowning
and drowning. Br J Anaesth 1997;79:214—25.
78. Wyatt JP, Tomlinson GS, Busuttil A. Resuscitation of
drowning victims in south-east Scotland. Resuscitation
1999;41:101—4.
79. Schmidt U, Fritz KW, Kasperczyk W, Tscherne H. Successful
resuscitation of a child with severe hypothermia after car-
diac arrest of 88 min. Prehosp Disaster Med 1995;10:60—2.
80. Bolte RG, Black PG, Bowers RS, Thorne JK, Corneli HM. The
use of extracorporeal rewarming in a child submerged for
66 min. JAMA 1988;260:377—9.
81. The acute respiratory distress syndrome network. Ventila-
tion with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional
tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respira-
tory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301—8.
82. Moran I, Zavala E, Fernandez R, Blanch L, Mancebo J.
Recruitment manoeuvres in acute lung injury/acute
respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J Suppl
2003;42:37s—42s.
83. Nolan JP, Morley PT, Vanden Hoek TL, Hickey RW. Therapeu-
tic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. An advisory statement
by the Advancement Life support Task Force of the Inter-
national Liaison committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation
2003;57:231—5.
84. Holzer M, Behringer W, Schorkhuber W, et al. Mild
hypothermia and outcome after CPR. Hypothermia for Car-
diac Arrest (HACA) Study Group. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
Suppl 1997;111:55—8.
85. Sterz F, Safar P, Tisherman S, Radovsky A, Kuboyama K,
Oku K. Mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation
improves outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs.
Crit Care Med 1991;19:379—89.
86. Farstad M, Andersen KS, Koller ME, Grong K, Segadal L,
Husby P. Rewarming from accidental hypothermia by extra-
corporeal circulation. A retrospective study. Eur J Cardio-
thorac Surg 2001;20:58—64.
87. Schneider SM. Hypothermia: from recognition to rewarm-
ing. Emerg Med Rep 1992;13:1—20.
S166
88. Gilbert M, Busund R, Skagseth A, Nilsen PÅ, Solbø JP. Resus-
citation from accidental hypothermia of 13.7 ◦ C with circu-
latory arrest. Lancet 2000;355:375—6.
89. Danzl DF, Pozos RS, Auerbach PS, et al. Multicen-
ter hypothermia survey. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:1042—
55.
90. Reuler JB. Hypothermia: pathophysiology, clinical settings,
and management. Ann Intern Med 1978;89:519—27.
91. Lefrant JY, Muller L, de La Coussaye JE, et al. Temperature
measurement in intensive care patients: comparison of uri-
nary bladder, oesophageal, rectal, axillary, and inguinal
methods versus pulmonary artery core method. Intensive
Care Med 2003;29:414—8.
92. Robinson J, Charlton J, Seal R, Spady D, Joffres MR.
Oesophageal, rectal, axillary, tympanic and pulmonary
artery temperatures during cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth
1998;45:317—23.
93. Krismer AC, Lindner KH, Kornberger R, et al. Cardiopul-
monary resuscitation during severe hypothermia in pigs:
does epinephrine or vasopressin increase coronary perfu-
sion pressure? Anesth Analg 2000;90:69—73.
94. Kornberger E, Lindner KH, Mayr VD, et al. Effects of
epinephrine in a pig model of hypothermic cardiac arrest
and closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation combined
with active rewarming. Resuscitation 2001;50:301—8.
95. Stoner J, Martin G, O’Mara K, Ehlers J, Tomlanovich M.
Amiodarone and bretylium in the treatment of hypother-
mic ventricular fibrillation in a canine model. Acad Emerg
Med 2003;10:187—91.
96. Mattu A, Brady WJ, Perron AD. Electrocardiographic
manifestations of hypothermia. Am J Emerg Med
2002;20:314—26.
97. Southwick FS, DalglishS P.H. Jr. Recovery after prolonged
asystolic cardiac arrest in profound hypothermia: a case
report and literature review. JAMA 1980;243:1250—3.
98. Ujhelyi MR, Sims JJ, Dubin SA, Vender J, Miller AW.
Defibrillation energy requirements and electrical hetero-
geneity during total body hypothermia. Crit Care Med
2001;29:1006—11.
99. Kornberger E, Schwarz B, Lindner KH, Mair P. Forced
air surface rewarming in patients with severe accidental
hypothermia. Resuscitation 1999;41:105—11.
100. Roggla M, Frossard M, Wagner A, Holzer M, Bur A,
Roggla G. Severe accidental hypothermia with or with-
out hemodynamic instability: rewarming without the
use of extracorporeal circulation. Wien Klin Wochenschr
2002;114:315—20.
101. Weinberg AD, Hamlet MP, Paturas JL, White RD, McAninch
GW. Cold weather emergencies: principles of patient man-
agement. Branford, CN: American Medical Publishing Co.;
1990.
102. Zell SC, Kurtz KJ. Severe exposure hypothermia: a resusci-
tation protocol. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:339—45.
103. Althaus U, Aeberhard P, Schupbach P, Nachbur BH, Muh-
lemann W. Management of profound accidental hypother-
mia with cardiorespiratory arrest. Ann Surg 1982;195:492—
5.
104. Walpoth BH, Walpoth-Aslan BN, Mattle HP, et al. Outcome
of survivors of accidental deep hypothermia and circulatory
arrest treated with extracorporeal blood warming. N Engl
J Med 1997;337:1500—5.
105. Silfvast T, Pettila V. Outcome from severe accidental
hypothermia in Southern Finland—–a 10-year review. Resus-
citation 2003;59:285—90.
106. Moss J. Accidental severe hypothermia. Surg Gynecol
Obstet 1986;162:501—13.
J. Soar et al.
107. Safar P. Cerebral resuscitation after cardiac arrest:
research initiatives and future directions [published cor-
rection appears in Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:759]. Ann
Emerg Med 1993;22(pt 2):324—49.
108. Bouchama A, Knochel JP. Heat stroke. N Engl J Med
2002;346:1978—88.
109. Wappler F. Malignant hyperthermia. Eur J Anaesthesiol
2001;18:632—52.
110. Ali SZ, Taguchi A, Rosenberg H. Malignant hyperther-
mia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003;17:519—
33.
111. Bouchama A. The 2003 European heat wave. Intensive Care
Med 2004;30:1—3.
112. Coris EE, Ramirez AM, Van Durme DJ. Heat illness in ath-
letes: the dangerous combination of heat, humidity and
exercise. Sports Med 2004;34:9—16.
113. Grogan H, Hopkins PM. Heat stroke: implications for critical
care and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:700—7.
114. Bouchama A, De Vol EB. Acid-base alterations in heat-
stroke. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:680—5.
115. Akhtar MJ, al-Nozha M, al-Harthi S, Nouh MS. Electrocardio-
graphic abnormalities in patients with heat stroke. Chest
1993;104:411—4.
116. el-Kassimi FA, Al-Mashhadani S, Abdullah AK, Akhtar J.
Adult respiratory distress syndrome and disseminated
intravascular coagulation complicating heat stroke. Chest
1986;90:571—4.
117. Waruiru C, Appleton R. Febrile seizures: an update. Arch
Dis Child 2004;89:751—6.
118. Berger J, Hart J, Millis M, Baker AL. Fulminant hepatic fail-
ure from heat stroke requiring liver transplantation. J Clin
Gastroenterol 2000;30:429—31.
119. Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, Marik PE. Bench-to-bedside
review: Rhabdomyolysis—–an overview for clinicians. Crit
Care 2005;9:158—69.
120. Wolff ED, Driessen OMJ. Theophylline intoxication in a
child. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1977;121:896—901.
121. Sidor K, Mikolajczyk W, Horwath-Stolarczyk A. Acute poi-
soning in children hospitalized at the Medical University
Hospital No 3 in Warsaw, between 1996 and 2000. Pediatr
Polska 2002;77:509—16.
122. Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J
Med 2005;352:1112—20.
123. Bhanushali MJ, Tuite PJ. The evaluation and management
of patients with neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Neurol
Clin 2004;22:389—411.
124. Abraham E, Matthay MA, Dinarello CA, et al. Consensus
conference definitions for sepsis, septic shock, acute lung
injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome: time for a
re-evaluation. Crit Care Med 2000;28:232—5.
125. Savage MW, Mah PM, Weetman AP, Newell-Price J.
Endocrine emergencies. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:506—15.
126. Hadad E, Weinbroum AA, Ben-Abraham R. Drug-induced
hyperthermia and muscle rigidity: a practical approach.
Eur J Emerg Med 2003;10:149—54.
127. Halloran LL, Bernard DW. Management of drug-induced
hyperthermia. Curr Opin Pediatr 2004;16:211—5.
128. Armstrong LE, Crago AE, Adams R, Roberts WO, Maresh CM.
Whole-body cooling of hyperthermic runners: comparison
of two field therapies. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:355—8.
129. Horowitz BZ. The golden hour in heat stroke: use of iced
peritoneal lavage. Am J Emerg Med 1989;7:616—9.
130. Bernard S, Buist M, Monteiro O, Smith K. Induced hypother-
mia using large volume, ice-cold intravenous fluid in
comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a pre-
liminary report. Resuscitation 2003;56:9—13.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
131. Schmutzhard E, Engelhardt K, Beer R, et al. Safety
and efficacy of a novel intravascular cooling device to
control body temperature in neurologic intensive care
patients: a prospective pilot study. Crit Care Med 2002;30:
2481—8.
132. Al-Senani FM, Graffagnino C, Grotta JC, et al. A prospec-
tive, multicenter pilot study to evaluate the feasibility
and safety of using the CoolGard system and icy catheter
following cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2004;62:143—
50.
133. Behringer W, Safar P, Wu X, et al. Veno-venous extracorpo-
real blood shunt cooling to induce mild hypothermia in dog
experiments and review of cooling methods. Resuscitation
2002;54:89—98.
134. Hadad E, Cohen-Sivan Y, Heled Y, Epstein Y. Clinical review:
treatment of heat stroke—–should dantrolene be consid-
ered? Crit Care 2005;9:86—91.
135. Krause T, Gerbershagen MU, Fiege M, Weisshorn R, Wappler
F. Dantrolene—–a review of its pharmacology, therapeutic
use and new developments. Anaesthesia 2004;59:364—73.
136. Eshel G, Safar P, Sassano J, Stezoski W. Hyperthermia-
induced cardiac arrest in dogs and monkeys. Resuscitation
1990;20:129—43.
137. Eshel G, Safar P, Radovsky A, Stezoski SW. Hyperthermia-
induced cardiac arrest in monkeys: limited efficacy of stan-
dard CPR. Aviat Space Environ Med 1997;68:415—20.
138. Zeiner A, Holzer M, Sterz F, et al. Hyperthermia after car-
diac arrest is associated with an unfavorable neurologic
outcome. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2007—12.
139. Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, Beasley R. The global burden
of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination
Committee report. Allergy 2004;59:469—78.
140. BTS/SIGN. British Thoracic Society, Scottish Intercollegiate
Guidelines Network (SIGN). British guideline on the man-
agement of asthma. Thorax 2003;58(Suppl. I):i1—94.
141. Rainbow J, Browne GJ. Fatal asthma or anaphylaxis? Emerg
Med J 2002;19:415—7.
142. Kokturk N, Demir N, Kervan F, Dinc E, Koybasioglu A, Turk-
tas H. A subglottic mass mimicking near-fatal asthma: a
challenge of diagnosis. J Emerg Med 2004;26:57—60.
143. Ratto D, Alfaro C, Sipsey J, Glovsky MM, Sharma OP. Are
intravenous corticosteroids required in status asthmaticus?
JAMA 1988;260:527—9.
144. Aaron SD. The use of ipratropium bromide for the manage-
ment of acute asthma exacerbation in adults and children:
a systematic review. J Asthma 2001;38:521—30.
145. Rodrigo G, Rodrigo C, Burschtin O. A meta-analysis of
the effects of ipratropium bromide in adults with acute
asthma. Am J Med 1999;107:363—70.
146. Munro A, Jacobs M. Best evidence topic reports. Is intra-
venous aminophylline better than intravenous salbutamol
in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma? Emerg Med
J 2004;21:78—80.
147. Rowe BH, Bretzlaff JA, Bourdon C, Bota GW, Camargo Jr
CA. Magnesium sulfate for treating exacerbations of acute
asthma in the emergency department. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2000:CD001490.
148. Cydulka R, Davison R, Grammer L, Parker M, Mathews IV
J. The use of epinephrine in the treatment of older adult
asthmatics. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:322—6.
149. Victoria MS, Battista CJ, Nangia BS. Comparison of sub-
cutaneous terbutaline with epinephrine in the treat-
ment of asthma in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol
1977;59:128—35.
150. Victoria MS, Battista CJ, Nangia BS. Comparison between
epinephrine and terbutaline injections in the acute man-
agement of asthma. J Asthma 1989;26:287—90.
S167
151. Rodrigo GJ, Rodrigo C, Pollack CV, Rowe B. Use of helium-
oxygen mixtures in the treatment of acute asthma: a sys-
tematic review. Chest 2003;123:891—6.
152. Petrillo TM, Fortenberry JD, Linzer JF, Simon HK. Emer-
gency department use of ketamine in pediatric status asth-
maticus. J Asthma 2001;38:657—64.
153. Howton JC, Rose J, Duffy S, Zoltanski T, Levitt MA. Random-
ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous
ketamine in acute asthma. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:170—5.
154. Antonelli M, Pennisi MA, Montini L. Clinical review: nonin-
vasive ventilation in the clinical setting—–experience from
the past 10 years. Crit Care 2005;9:98—103.
155. Ram FS, Wellington S, Rowe BH, Wedzicha JA. Non-invasive
positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respira-
tory failure due to severe acute exacerbations of asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD004360.
156. Leatherman JW, McArthur C, Shapiro RS. Effect of pro-
longation of expiratory time on dynamic hyperinflation in
mechanically ventilated patients with severe asthma. Crit
Care Med 2004;32:1542—5.
157. Bowman FP, Menegazzi JJ, Check BD, Duckett TM. Lower
esophageal sphincter pressure during prolonged cardiac
arrest and resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 1995;26:216—
9.
158. Lapinsky SE, Leung RS. Auto-PEEP and electromechanical
dissociation. N Engl J Med 1996;335:674.
159. Rogers PL, Schlichtig R, Miro A, Pinsky M. Auto-PEEP during
CPR. An ‘‘occult’’ cause of electromechanical dissociation?
Chest 1991;99:492—3.
160. Rosengarten PL, Tuxen DV, Dziukas L, Scheinkestel C, Mer-
rett K, Bowes G. Circulatory arrest induced by inter-
mittent positive pressure ventilation in a patient with
severe asthma. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991;19:118—
21.
161. Sprung J, Hunter K, Barnas GM, Bourke DL. Abdominal
distention is not always a sign of esophageal intuba-
tion: cardiac arrest due to ‘‘auto-PEEP’’. Anesth Analg
1994;78:801—4.
162. Deakin CD, McLaren RM, Petley GW, Clewlow F, Dalrymple-
Hay MJ. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on
transthoracic impedance—–implications for defibrillation.
Resuscitation 1998;37:9—12.
163. Mazzeo AT, Spada A, Pratico C, Lucanto T, Santamaria LB.
Hypercapnia: what is the limit in paediatric patients? A
case of near-fatal asthma successfully treated by multi-
pharmacological approach. Paediatr Anaesth 2004;14:596—
603.
164. Mertes PM, Laxenaire MC, Alla F. Anaphylactic and anaphy-
lactoid reactions occurring during anesthesia in France in
1999—2000. Anesthesiology 2003;99:536—45.
165. Yunginger JW. Latex allergy in the workplace: an
overview of where we are. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
1999;83:630—3.
166. Dreyfus DH, Fraser B, Randolph CC. Anaphylaxis to latex
in patients without identified risk factors for latex allergy.
Conn Med 2004;68:217—22.
167. Ownby DR. A history of latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol
2002;110:S27—32.
168. Pumphrey RS. Lessons for management of anaphy-
laxis from a study of fatal reactions. Clin Exp Allergy
2000;30:1144—50.
169. Pumphrey RS. Fatal anaphylaxis in the UK, 1992—2001.
Novartis Found Symp 2004;257:116—28, discussion 28—32,
57—60, 276—285.
170. Incorvaia C, Senna G, Mauro M, et al. Prevalence of allergic
reactions to Hymenoptera stings in northern Italy. Allerg
Immunol (Paris) 2004;36:372—4.
S168
171. Pumphrey RS, Roberts IS. Postmortem findings after fatal
anaphylactic reactions. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:273—6.
172. Mullins RJ. Anaphylaxis: risk factors for recurrence. Clin
Exp Allergy 2003;33:1033—40.
173. Brown AF. Anaphylaxis: quintessence, quarrels, and quan-
daries. Emerg Med J 2001;18:328.
174. Brown AF. Anaphylaxis gets the adrenaline going. Emerg
Med J 2004;21:128—9.
175. Ishoo E, Shah UK, Grillone GA, Stram JR, Fuleihan
NS. Predicting airway risk in angioedema: staging sys-
tem based on presentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
1999;121:263—8.
176. Pumphrey R. Anaphylaxis: can we tell who is at risk
of a fatal reaction? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol
2004;4:285—90.
177. Simons FE, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine absorption in
adults: intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection. J
Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108:871—3.
178. Simons FER, Chan ES, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine for
the out-of-hospital (first-aid) treatment of anaphylaxis in
infants: is the ampule/syringe/needle method practical? J
Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108:1040—4.
179. Winbery SL, Lieberman PL. Histamine and antihistamines
in anaphylaxis. Clin Allergy Immunol 2002;17:287—317.
180. Kill C, Wranze E, Wulf H. Successful treatment of severe
anaphylactic shock with vasopressin. Two case reports. Int
Arch Allergy Immunol 2004;134:260—1.
181. Williams SR, Denault AY, Pellerin M, Martineau R. Vaso-
pressin for treatment of shock following aprotinin admin-
istration. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:169—72.
182. Visscher PK, Vetter RS, Camazine S. Removing bee stings.
Lancet 1996;348:301—2.
183. Yocum MW, Butterfield JH, Klein JS, Volcheck GW,
Schroeder DR, Silverstein MD. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis
in Olmsted County: a population-based study. J Allergy Clin
Immunol 1999;104(pt 1):452—6.
184. Ellis AK, Day JH. Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis.
CMAJ 2003;169:307—11.
185. Smith PL, Kagey-Sobotka A, Bleecker ER, et al. Physio-
logic manifestations of human anaphylaxis. J Clin Invest
1980;66:1072—80.
186. Stark BJ, Sullivan TJ. Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:76—83.
187. Brazil E, MacNamara AF. Not so immediate’’ hypersensitiv-
ity: the danger of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. J Accid
Emerg Med 1998;15:252—3.
188. Brady Jr WJ, Luber S, Carter CT, Guertler A, Lind-
beck G. Multiphasic anaphylaxis: an uncommon event
in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:
193—7.
189. Joint Working Party of the Association of Anaesthetists of
Great Britain and Ireland and the British Society for Allergy
and Clinical Immunology. Suspected anaphylactic reactions
associated with anaesthesia. 3rd ed. London: The Associa-
tion of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and British
Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology; 2003.
190. Payne V, Kam PC. Mast cell tryptase: a review of
its physiology and clinical significance. Anaesthesia
2004;59:695—703.
191. Anthi A, Tzelepis GE, Alivizatos P, Michalis A, Palatianos
GM, Geroulanos S. Unexpected cardiac arrest after car-
diac surgery: incidence, predisposing causes, and out-
come of open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Chest
1998;113:15—9.
192. Wahba A, Gotz W, Birnbaum DE. Outcome of cardiopul-
monary resuscitation following open heart surgery. Scand
Cardiovasc J 1997;31:147—9.
J. Soar et al.
193. Rhodes JF, Blaufox AD, Seiden HS, et al. Cardiac arrest
in infants after congenital heart surgery. Circulation
1999;100:II194—9.
194. Dimopoulou I, Anthi A, Michalis A, Tzelepis GE. Func-
tional status and quality of life in long-term survivors
of cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med
2001;29:1408—11.
195. Mackay JH, Powell SJ, Osgathorp J, Rozario CJ. Six-year
prospective audit of chest reopening after cardiac arrest.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:421—5.
196. Pottle A, Bullock I, Thomas J, Scott L. Survival to discharge
following open chest cardiac compression (OCCC). A 4-year
retrospective audit in a cardiothoracic specialist centre—–
Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Resuscitation 2002;52:269—72.
197. Raman J, Saldanha RF, Branch JM, et al. Open cardiac com-
pression in the postoperative cardiac intensive care unit.
Anaesth Intensive Care 1989;17:129—35.
198. Birdi I, Chaudhuri N, Lenthall K, Reddy S, Nashef SA. Emer-
gency reinstitution of cardiopulmonary bypass following
cardiac surgery: outcome justifies the cost. Eur J Cardio-
thorac Surg 2000;17:743—6.
199. Rousou JA, Engelman RM, Flack III JE, Deaton DW, Owen SG.
Emergency cardiopulmonary bypass in the cardiac surgical
unit can be a lifesaving measure in postoperative cardiac
arrest. Circulation 1994;90:II280—4.
200. Schwarz B, Bowdle TA, Jett GK, et al. Biphasic shocks com-
pared with monophasic damped sine wave shocks for direct
ventricular defibrillation during open heart surgery. Anes-
thesiology 2003;98:1063—9.
201. Rosemurgy AS, Norris PA, Olson SM, Hurst JM, Albrink MH.
Prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest: the cost of futility. J
Trauma 1993;35:468—73.
202. Battistella FD, Nugent W, Owings JT, Anderson JT.
Field triage of the pulseless trauma patient. Arch Surg
1999;134:742—5.
203. Shimazu S, Shatney CH. Outcomes of trauma patients
with no vital signs on hospital admission. J Trauma
1983;23:213—6.
204. Stockinger ZT, McSwain Jr NE. Additional evidence in sup-
port of withholding or terminating cardiopulmonary resus-
citation for trauma patients in the field. J Am Coll Surg
2004;198:227—31.
205. Fulton RL, Voigt WJ, Hilakos AS. Confusion surrounding
the treatment of traumatic cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Surg
1995;181:209—14.
206. Pasquale MD, Rhodes M, Cipolle MD, Hanley T, Wasser T.
Defining ‘‘dead on arrival’’: impact on a level I trauma cen-
ter. J Trauma 1996;41:726—30.
207. Stratton SJ, Brickett K, Crammer T. Prehospital pulseless,
unconscious penetrating trauma victims: field assessments
associated with survival. J Trauma 1998;45:96—100.
208. Maron BJ, Gohman TE, Kyle SB, Estes III NA, Link MS.
Clinical profile and spectrum of commotio cordis. JAMA
2002;287:1142—6.
209. Maron BJ, Estes III NA, Link MS. Task Force 11: commotio
cordis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1371—3.
210. Nesbitt AD, Cooper PJ, Kohl P. Rediscovering commotio
cordis. Lancet 2001;357:1195—7.
211. Link MS, Estes M, Maron BJ. Sudden death caused by
chest wall trauma (commotio cordis). In: Kohl P, Sachs F,
Franz MR, editors. Cardiac mechano-electric feedback and
arrhythmias: from pipette to patient. Philadelphia: Else-
vier Saunders; 2005. p. 270—6.
212. Bouillon B, Walther T, Kramer M, Neugebauer E. Trauma and
circulatory arrest: 224 preclinical resuscitations in Cologne
in 1990 [in German]. Anaesthesist 1994;43:786—90.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
213. Fisher B, Worthen M. Cardiac arrest induced by blunt
trauma in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 1999;15:
274—6.
214. Hazinski MF, Chahine AA, Holcomb III GW, Morris Jr JA. Out-
come of cardiovascular collapse in pediatric blunt trauma.
Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:1229—35.
215. Calkins CM, Bensard DD, Partrick DA, Karrer FM. A critical
analysis of outcome for children sustaining cardiac arrest
after blunt trauma. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:180—4.
216. Yanagawa Y, Saitoh D, Takasu A, Kaneko N, Sakamoto T,
Okada Y. Experience of treatment for blunt traumatic
out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest patients over 24
years: head injury vs. non-head injury. No Shinkei Geka
2004;32:231—5.
217. Cera SM, Mostafa G, Sing RF, Sarafin JL, Matthews BD, Heni-
ford BT. Physiologic predictors of survival in post-traumatic
arrest. Am Surg 2003;69:140—4.
218. Esposito TJ, Jurkovich GJ, Rice CL, Maier RV, Copass MK,
Ashbaugh DG. Reappraisal of emergency room thoracotomy
in a changing environment. J Trauma 1991;31:881—5, dis-
cussion 5—7.
219. Martin SK, Shatney CH, Sherck JP, et al. Blunt trauma
patients with prehospital pulseless electrical activity
(PEA): poor ending assured. J Trauma 2002;53:876—80, dis-
cussion 80—81.
220. Domeier RM, McSwain Jr NE, Hopson LR, et al. Guidelines
for withholding or termination of resuscitation in prehos-
pital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. J Am Coll Surg
2003;196:475—81.
221. Pickens JJ, Copass MK, Bulger EM. Trauma patients
receiving CPR: predictors of survival. J Trauma 2005;58:
951—8.
222. Gervin AS, Fischer RP. The importance of prompt transport
of salvage of patients with penetrating heart wounds. J
Trauma 1982;22:443—8.
223. Branney SW, Moore EE, Feldhaus KM, Wolfe RE. Critical
analysis of two decades of experience with postinjury
emergency department thoracotomy in a regional trauma
center. J Trauma 1998;45:87—94, discussion -5.
224. Durham III LA, Richardson RJ, Wall Jr MJ, Pepe PE, Mattox
KL. Emergency center thoracotomy: impact of prehospital
resuscitation. J Trauma 1992;32:775—9.
225. Frezza EE, Mezghebe H. Is 30 min the golden period to per-
form emergency room thoratomy (ERT) in penetrating chest
injuries? J Cardiovasc Surg 1999;40:147—51.
226. Powell DW, Moore EE, Cothren CC, et al. Is emergency
department resuscitative thoracotomy futile care for the
critically injured patient requiring prehospital cardiopul-
monary resuscitation? J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:211—5.
227. Coats TJ, Keogh S, Clark H, Neal M. Prehospital resus-
citative thoracotomy for cardiac arrest after pene-
trating trauma: rationale and case series. J Trauma
2001;50:670—3.
228. Wise D, Davies G, Coats T, Lockey D, Hyde J, Good A.
Emergency thoracotomy: ‘‘how to do it’’. Emerg Med J
2005;22:22—4.
229. Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I. Spinal immobilisation for trauma
patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001. CD002803.
230. Voiglio EJ, Coats TJ, Baudoin YP, Davies GD, Wil-
son AW. Resuscitative transverse thoracotomy. Ann Chir
2003;128:728—33.
231. Practice management guidelines for emergency depart-
ment thoracotomy. Working Group, Ad Hoc Subcommittee
on Outcomes, American College of Surgeons-Committee on
Trauma. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:303—9.
232. Jones JH, Murphy MP, Dickson RL, Somerville GG, Brizen-
dine EJ. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intu-
S169
bation: miss rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med
2004;11:707—9.
233. Jemmett ME, Kendal KM, Fourre MW, Burton JH. Unrec-
ognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes in a mixed
urban to rural emergency medical services setting. Acad
Emerg Med 2003;10:961—5.
234. Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by
paramedics in an urban emergency medical services sys-
tem. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:32—7.
235. Deakin CD, Peters R, Tomlinson P, Cassidy M. Securing the
prehospital airway: a comparison of laryngeal mask inser-
tion and endotracheal intubation by UK paramedics. Emerg
Med J 2005;22:64—7.
236. Pepe PE, Roppolo LP, Fowler RL. The detrimental effects
of ventilation during low-blood-flow states. Curr Opin Crit
Care 2005;11:212—8.
237. Deakin CD, Davies G, Wilson A. Simple thoracostomy avoids
chest drain insertion in prehospital trauma. J Trauma
1995;39:373—4.
238. Luna GK, Pavlin EG, Kirkman T, Copass MK, Rice CL. Hemo-
dynamic effects of external cardiac massage in trauma
shock. J Trauma 1989;29:1430—3.
239. Gao JM, Gao YH, Wei GB, et al. Penetrating cardiac
wounds: principles for surgical management. World J Surg
2004;28:1025—9.
240. Kwan I, Bunn F, Roberts I. Timing and volume of fluid admin-
istration for patients with bleeding. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2003. CD002245.
241. Pepe PE, Mosesso VN, Falk JL. Prehospital fluid resuscita-
tion of the patient with major trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care
2002;6:81—91.
242. Bickell WH, Wall Jr MJ, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus
delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with
penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1105—9.
243. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Prehospital ini-
tiation of fluid replacement therapy for trauma. London:
National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004.
244. Sumida MP, Quinn K, Lewis PL, et al. Prehospital blood
transfusion versus crystalloid alone in the air medical trans-
port of trauma patients. Air Med J 2000;19:140—3.
245. Barkana Y, Stein M, Maor R, Lynn M, Eldad A. Prehospi-
tal blood transfusion in prolonged evacuation. J Trauma
1999;46:176—80.
246. Walcher F, Kortum S, Kirschning T, Weihgold N, Marzi I. Opti-
mized management of polytraumatized patients by prehos-
pital ultrasound. Unfallchirurg 2002;105:986—94.
247. Krismer AC, Wenzel V, Voelckel WG, et al. Employing vaso-
pressin as an adjunct vasopressor in uncontrolled traumatic
hemorrhagic shock. Three cases and a brief analysis of the
literature. Anaesthesist 2005;54:220—4.
248. Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office
Department of Health, Department of Health and Social
Services, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die. Report on
confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United
Kingdom, 2000—2002. London: The Stationery Office;
2004.
249. Page-Rodriguez A, Gonzalez-Sanchez JA. Perimortem
cesarean section of twin pregnancy: case report and review
of the literature. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:1072—4.
250. Cardosi RJ, Porter KB. Cesarean delivery of twins dur-
ing maternal cardiopulmonary arrest. Obstet Gynecol
1998;92:695—7.
251. Kinsella SM. Lateral tilt for pregnant women: why 15
degrees? Anaesthesia 2003;58:835—6.
252. Nanson J, Elcock D, Williams M, Deakin CD. Do physiological
changes in pregnancy change defibrillation energy require-
ments? Br J Anaesth 2001;87:237—9.
S170
253. Johnson MD, Luppi CJ, Over DC. Cardiopulmonary resus-
citation. In: Gambling DR, Douglas MJ, editors. Obstetric
anesthesia and uncommon disorders. Philadelphia: W.B.
Saunders; 1998. p. 51—74.
254. Rahman K, Jenkins JG. Failed tracheal intubation in obstet-
rics: no more frequent but still managed badly. Anaesthesia
2005;60:168—71.
255. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Difficult
airway society guidelines for management of the unan-
ticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2004;59:675—
94.
256. Catling S, Joels L. Cell salvage in obstetrics: the time has
come. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;112:131—2.
257. Ahonen J, Jokela R. Recombinant factor VIIa for life-
threatening post-partum haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth
2005;94:592—5.
258. Bouwmeester FW, Bolte AC, van Geijn HP. Pharmacological
and surgical therapy for primary postpartum hemorrhage.
Curr Pharm Des 2005;11:759—73.
259. El-Hamamy E, CBL. A worldwide review of the uses of the
uterine compression suture techniques as alternative to
hysterectomy in the management of severe post-partum
haemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;25:143—9.
260. Hong TM, Tseng HS, Lee RC, Wang JH, Chang CY. Uterine
artery embolization: an effective treatment for intractable
obstetric haemorrhage. Clin Radiol 2004;59:96—
101.
261. Yu S, Pennisi JA, Moukhtar M, Friedman EA. Placental
abruption in association with advanced abdominal preg-
nancy. A case report. J Reprod Med 1995;40:731—5.
262. Wlody D. Complications of regional anesthesia in obstet-
rics. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46:667—78.
263. Ray P, Murphy GJ, Shutt LE. Recognition and management
of maternal cardiac disease in pregnancy. Br J Anaesth
2004;93:428—39.
264. Abbas AE, Lester SJ, Connolly H. Pregnancy and the cardio-
vascular system. Int J Cardiol 2005;98:179—89.
265. Doan-Wiggins L. Resuscitation of the pregnant patient suf-
fering sudden death. In: Paradis NA, Halperin HR, Nowak
RM, editors. Cardiac arrest: the science and practice
of resuscitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
1997. p. 812—9.
266. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet
2005;365:785—99.
267. Sibai BM. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of
eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:402—10.
268. Dapprich M, Boessenecker W. Fibrinolysis with alteplase
in a pregnant woman with stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis
2002;13:290.
269. Turrentine MA, Braems G, Ramirez MM. Use of thrombolyt-
ics for the treatment of thromboembolic disease during
pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1995;50:534—41.
270. Thabut G, Thabut D, Myers RP, et al. Thrombolytic therapy
of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol
2002;40:1660—7.
271. Patel RK, Fasan O, Arya R. Thrombolysis in pregnancy.
Thromb Haemost 2003;90:1216—7.
272. Tuffnell DJ. Amniotic fluid embolism. Curr Opin Obstet
Gynecol 2003;15:119—22.
273. Stanten RD, Iverson LI, Daugharty TM, Lovett SM, Terry
C, Blumenstock E. Amniotic fluid embolism causing catas-
trophic pulmonary vasoconstriction: diagnosis by trans-
esophageal echocardiogram and treatment by cardiopul-
monary bypass. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:496—8.
274. Katz VL, Dotters DJ, Droegemueller W. Perimortem
cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:571—6.
J. Soar et al.
275. Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and
Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus
on Science. Part 8: advanced challenges in resuscitation.
Section 3. Special challenges in ECC. 3F: cardiac arrest
associated with pregnancy. Resuscitation 2000;46:293—5.
276. Cummins RO, Hazinski MF, Zelop CM. Chapter 4, Part 6:
cardiac arrest associated with pregnancy. In: Cummins R,
Hazinski M, Field J, editors. ACLS—–the reference text-
book. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2003, p. 143—
158.
277. Oates S, Williams GL, Rees GA. Cardiopulmonary resuscita-
tion in late pregnancy. BMJ 1988;297:404—5.
278. Strong THJ, Lowe RA. Perimortem cesarean section. Am J
Emerg Med 1989;7:489—94.
279. Boyd R, Teece S. Towards evidence based emergency
medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infir-
mary. Perimortem caesarean section. Emerg Med J
2002;19:324—5.
280. Moore C, Promes SB. Ultrasound in pregnancy. Emerg Med
Clin N Am 2004;22:697—722.
281. Budnick LD. Bathtub-related electrocutions in the United
States, 1979 to 1982. JAMA 1984;252:918—20.
282. Lightning-associated deaths—–United States, 1980—1995.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998;47:391—4.
283. Geddes LA, Bourland JD, Ford G. The mechanism under-
lying sudden death from electric shock. Med Instrum
1986;20:303—15.
284. Zafren K, Durrer B, Herry JP, Brugger H. Lightning injuries:
prevention and on-site treatment in mountains and remote
areas. Official guidelines of the International Commission
for Mountain Emergency Medicine and the Medical Com-
mission of the International Mountaineering and Climb-
ing Federation (ICAR and UIAA MEDCOM). Resuscitation
2005;65:369—72.
285. Cherington M. Lightning injuries. Ann Emerg Med
1995;25:517—9.
286. Fahmy FS, Brinsden MD, Smith J, Frame JD. Lightning: the
multisystem group injuries. J Trauma 1999;46:937—40.
287. Patten BM. Lightning and electrical injuries. Neurol Clin
1992;10:1047—58.
288. Browne BJ, Gaasch WR. Electrical injuries and lightning.
Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992;10:211—29.
289. Kleiner JP, Wilkin JH. Cardiac effects of lightning stroke.
JAMA 1978;240:2757—9.
290. Lichtenberg R, Dries D, Ward K, Marshall W, Scanlon P. Car-
diovascular effects of lightning strikes. J Am Coll Cardiol
1993;21:531—6.
291. Cooper MA. Emergent care of lightning and electrical
injuries. Semin Neurol 1995;15:268—78.
292. Milzman DP, Moskowitz L, Hardel M. Lightning strikes at a
mass gathering. S Med J 1999;92:708—10.
293. Cooper MA. Lightning injuries: prognostic signs for death.
Ann Emerg Med 1980;9:134—8.
294. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK. Neuropathology of lightning
strike injuries. Semin Neurol 1995;15:323—8.
295. Stewart CE. When lightning strikes. Emerg Med Serv
2000;29:57—67, quiz 103.
296. Duclos PJ, Sanderson LM. An epidemiological description
of lightning-related deaths in the United States. Int J Epi-
demiol 1990;19:673—9.
297. Epperly TD, Stewart JR. The physical effects of lightning
injury. J Fam Pract 1989;29:267—72.
298. Whitcomb D, Martinez JA, Daberkow D. Lightning injuries.
S Med J 2002;95:1331—4.
299. Goldman RD, Einarson A, Koren G. Electric shock during
pregnancy. Can Fam Physician 2003;49:297—8.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S171—S180

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for

Resuscitation 2005
Section 8. The ethics of resuscitation and
end-of-life decisions
Peter J.F. Baskett, Petter A. Steen, Leo Bossaert

Introduction This section of the guidelines deals with ethical

aspects and decisions, including
Successful resuscitation attempts have brought
• advance directives, sometimes known as living
extended, useful and precious life to many, and
wills;
happiness and relief to their relatives and loved
• when not to start resuscitation attempts;
ones. And yet, there are occasions when resuscita-
• when to stop resuscitation attempts;
tion attempts have merely prolonged suffering and
• decision making by non-physicians;
the process of dying. In few cases resuscitation has
• when to withdraw treatment from those in a per-
resulted in the ultimate tragedy—–the patient in a
sistent vegetative state following resuscitation;
persistent vegetative state. Resuscitation attempts
• decisions about family members or loved ones
are unsuccessful in 70—95% of cases and death ulti-
who wish to be present during resuscitation;
mately is inevitable. All would wish to die with
• decisions about research and training on the
dignity.
recently dead;
Several ethical decisions are required to ensure
• the breaking of bad news to relatives and loved
that the decisions to attempt or withhold cardiopul-
ones;
monary resuscitation (CPR) are appropriate, and
• staff support.
that patients and their loved ones are treated with
dignity. These decisions may be influenced by indi-
vidual, international and local cultural, legal, tra-
ditional, religious, social and economic factors.1—10 Principles
Sometimes the decisions can be made in advance,
but often they have to be made in a matter of sec- The four key principles are beneficence, non-
onds at the time of the emergency. Therefore, it maleficence, justice and autonomy.11
is important that healthcare providers understand Beneficence implies that healthcare providers
the principles involved before they are put in a must provide benefit while balancing benefit and
situation where a resuscitation decision must be risks. Commonly this will involve attempting resus-
made. citation, but on occasion it will mean withholding

0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.005
S172
cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Beneficence
may also include responding to the overall needs of
the community, e.g. establishing a programme of
public access to defibrillation.
Non maleficence means doing no harm. Resusci-
tation should not be attempted in futile cases, nor
when it is against the patient’s wishes (expressed
when the individual is in a mentally competent
state).
Justice implies a duty to spread benefits and risks
equally within a society. If resuscitation is provided,
it should be made available to all who will benefit
from it within the available resources.
Autonomy relates to patients being able to make
informed decisions on their own behalf, rather than
being subjected to paternalistic decisions being
made for them by the medical or nursing pro-
fessions. This principle has been introduced par-
ticularly during the past 30 years, arising from
legislature such as the Helsinki Declaration of
Human Rights and its subsequent modifications
and amendments.12 Autonomy requires that the
patient is adequately informed, competent, free
from undue pressure and that there is consistency
in the patient’s preferences.
Advance directives
Advance directives have been introduced in many
countries, emphasising the importance of patient
autonomy. Advance directives are a method of com-
municating the patient’s wishes concerning future
care, particularly towards the end of life, and
must be expressed while the patient is mentally
competent and not under duress. Advance direc-
tives are likely to specify limitations concern-
ing terminal care, including the withholding of
CPR.
The term advance directive applies to any
expression of patient preferences, including mere
dialogue between patient and/or close relatives
and loved ones and/or medical or nursing atten-
dants. This may help healthcare attendants in
assessing the patient’s wishes should the patient
become mentally incompetent. However, problems
can arise. The relative may misinterpret the wishes
of the patient, or may have a vested interest in
the death (or continued existence) of the patient.
Healthcare providers tend to underestimate sick
patients’ desire to live.
Written directions by the patient, legally admin-
istered living wills or powers of attorney may elim-
inate some of these problems but are not without
limitations. The patient should describe as pre-
cisely as possible the situation envisaged when life
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
support should be withheld or discontinued. This
may be aided by a medical adviser. For instance,
many would prefer not to undergo the indignity
of futile CPR in the presence of end-stage multi-
organ failure with no reversible cause, but would
welcome the attempt at resuscitation should ven-
tricular fibrillation (VF) occur in association with a
remediable primary cardiac cause. Patients often
change their minds with change in circumstances,
and therefore the advanced directive should be as
recent as possible and take into account any change
of circumstances.
In sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the
attendants usually do not know the patient’s sit-
uation and wishes, and an advance directive is
often not readily available. In these circumstances,
resuscitation is begun immediately and questions
addressed later. There is no ethical difference in
stopping the resuscitation attempt that has started
if the healthcare providers are later presented with
an advance directive limiting care. The family doc-
tor can provide an invaluable link in these situa-
tions.
There is considerable international varia-
tion in the medical attitude to written advance
directives.1 In some countries, the written
advanced directive is considered to be legally
binding and disobedience is considered an assault;
in others, the advance directive is flagrantly
ignored if the doctor does not agree with the
contents. However, in recent years, there has
been a growing tendency towards compliance with
patient autonomy and a reduction in patronising
attitudes by the medical profession.1
When to withhold a resuscitation
attempt
Whereas patients have a right to refuse treatment,
they do not have an automatic right to demand
treatment; they cannot insist that resuscitation
must be attempted in any circumstance. A doc-
tor is required only to provide treatment that is
likely to benefit the patient, and is not required
to provide treatment that would be futile. How-
ever, it would be wise to seek a second opinion
in making this momentous decision, for fear that
the doctor’s own personal values, or the question
of available resources, might influence his or her
opinion.13
The decision to withhold a resuscitation attempt
raises several ethical and moral questions. What
constitutes futility? What exactly is being withheld?
Who should decide? Who should be consulted? Who
should be informed? Is informed consent required?
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
When should the decision be reviewed? What reli-
gious and cultural factors should be taken into con-
sideration?
What constitutes futility?
Futility exists if resuscitation will be of no benefit
in terms of prolonging life of acceptable quality. It
is problematic that, although predictors for non-
survival after attempted resuscitation have been
published,14—17 none has been tested on an inde-
pendent patient sample with sufficient predictive
value, apart from end-stage multi-organ failure
with no reversible cause. Furthermore, studies on
resuscitation are particularly dependent on system
factors such as time to CPR, time to defibrillation,
etc. These may be prolonged in any study but not
applicable to an individual case.
Inevitably, judgements will have to be made,
and there will be grey areas where subjective opin-
ions are required in patients with heart failure and
severe respiratory compromise, asphyxia, major
trauma, head injury and neurological disease. The
age of the patient may feature in the decision but
is only a relatively weak independent predictor of
outcome18,19 ; however, age is frequently associated
with a prevalence of comorbidity, which does have
an influence on prognosis. At the other end of the
scale, most doctors will err on the side of interven-
tion in children for emotional reasons, even though
the overall prognosis is often worse in children than
in adults. It is therefore important that clinicians
understand the factors which influence resuscita-
tion success.
What exactly should be withheld?
Do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) means that,
in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, CPR
should not be performed; DNAR means nothing
more than that. Other treatment should be con-
tinued, particularly pain relief and sedation, as
required. Ventilation and oxygen therapy, nutrition,
antibiotics, fluid and vasopressors, etc., are con-
tinued as indicated, if they are considered to be
contributing to the quality of life. If not, orders not
to continue or initiate any such treatments should
be specified independently of DNAR orders.
DNAR orders for many years in many countries
were written by single doctors, often without con-
sulting the patient, relatives or other health per-
sonnel, but there are now clear procedural require-
ments in many countries such as the USA, UK and
Norway.
S173
Who should decide not to attempt
resuscitation?
This very grave decision is usually made by the
senior doctor in charge of the patient after appro-
priate consultations. Decisions by committee are
impractical and have not been shown to work,
and hospital management personnel lack the train-
ing and experience on which to base a judge-
ment. Decisions by legal authorities are fraught
with delays and uncertainties, particularly if there
is an adversarial legal system, and should be sought
only if there are irreconcilable differences between
the parties involved. In especially difficult cases,
the senior doctor may wish to consult his or her
own medical defence society for a legal opinion.
Medical emergency teams (METs), acting in
response to concern about a patient’s condi-
tion from ward staff, can assist in initiating the
decision-making process concerning DNAR (see Sec-
tion 4a).20,21
Who should be consulted?
Although the ultimate decision for DNAR should
be made by the senior doctor in charge of the
patient, it is wise for this individual to consult oth-
ers before making the decision. Following the prin-
ciple of patient autonomy it is prudent, if possible,
to ascertain the patient’s wishes about a resus-
citation attempt. This must be done in advance,
when the patient is able to make an informed
choice. Opinions vary as to whether such discussions
should occur routinely for every hospital admission
(which might cause undue alarm in the majority
of cases) or only if the diagnosis of a potentially
life-threatening condition is made (when there is
a danger that the patient may be too ill to make a
balanced judgement). In presenting the facts to the
patient, the doctor must be as certain as possible of
the diagnosis and the prognosis and may seek a sec-
ond or third medical opinion in this matter. It is vital
that the doctor should not allow personal life values
to distort the discussion—–in matters of acceptabil-
ity of a certain quality of life, the patient’s opinion
should prevail.
It is considered essential for the doctor to have
discussions with close relatives and loved ones if at
all possible. Whereas they may influence the doc-
tor’s decision, it should be made clear to them that
the ultimate decision will be that of the doctor. It
is unfair and unreasonable to place the burden of
decision on the relative.
The doctor would also be wise to discuss the
matter with the nursing and junior medical per-
sonnel, who are often closer to the patient and
S174
more likely to be given personal information. The
patient’s family doctor may have very close and
long-term insight into the patient’s wishes and the
family relationships, based on years of knowledge
of the particular situation.
Who should be informed?
Once the decision has been made it must be com-
municated clearly to all who may be involved,
including patient and relatives. The decision and
the reasons for it, and a record of who has been
involved in the discussions should be written down,
ideally on a special DNAR form that should be
placed in a place of prominence in the patient’s
notes, and should be recorded in the nursing
records. Sadly, there is evidence of a reluctance
to commit such decisions to writing by doctors in
some centres in some countries.22
When to abandon the resuscitation
attempt
The vast majority of resuscitation attempts do not
succeed and have to be abandoned. Several factors
will influence the decision to stop the resuscitative
effort. These will include the medical history and
anticipated prognosis, the period between cardiac
arrest and start of CPR, the interval to defibrillation
and the period of advanced life support (ALS) with
continuing asystole and no reversible cause.
In many cases, particularly in out-of-hospital car-
diac arrest, the underlying cause of arrest may be
unknown or merely surmised, and the decision is
made to start resuscitation while further informa-
tion is gathered. If it becomes clear that the under-
lying cause renders the situation to be futile, then
resuscitation should be abandoned if the patient
remains in asystole with all ALS measures in place.
Additional information (such as an advance direc-
tive) may become available and may render dis-
continuation of the resuscitation attempt ethically
correct.
In general, resuscitation should be continued
as long as VF persists. It is generally accepted
that ongoing asystole for more than 20 min in the
absence of a reversible cause, and with all ALS mea-
sures in place, constitutes grounds for abandoning
the resuscitation attempt.23 There are, of course,
reports of exceptional cases that prove the general
rule, and each case must be assessed individually.
In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac ori-
gin, if recovery is going to occur, a return of spon-
taneous circulation usually takes place on site.
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
Patients with primary cardiac arrest, who require
ongoing CPR without any return of a pulse during
transport to hospital, rarely survive neurologically
intact.24
Many will persist with the resuscitation attempt
for longer if the patient is a child. This decision
is not generally justified on scientific grounds, for
the prognosis after cardiac arrest in children is cer-
tainly no better, and probably worse, than in adults.
Nevertheless, the decision to persist in the dis-
tressing circumstances of the death of a child is
quite understandable, and the potential enhanced
recruitment of cerebral cells in children after an
ischaemic insult is an as yet unknown factor to be
reckoned with.
The decision to abandon the resuscitation
attempt is made by the team leader, but after
consultation with the other team members, who
may have valid points to contribute. Ultimately, the
decision is based on the clinical judgement that the
patient’s arrest is unresponsive to ALS. The final
conclusion should be reached by the team leader
taking all facts and views into consideration and
dealing sympathetically, but firmly, with any dis-
senter.
When considering abandoning the resuscitation
attempt, a factor that may need to be taken into
account is the possibility of prolonging CPR and
other resuscitative measures to enable organ dona-
tion to take place. Mechanical chest compressions
may be valuable in these circumstances,25 but this
has not been studied. The issue of initiating life-
prolonging treatment with the sole purpose of har-
vesting organs is debated by ethicists, and there is
variation between the different countries of Europe
as to the ethics of this process; at present no con-
sensus exists.
Decision-making by non-physicians
Many cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are
attended by emergency medical technicians or
paramedics, who face similar dilemmas of when
to determine if resuscitation is futile and when
it should be abandoned. In general, resuscitation
is started in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest unless
there is a valid advanced directive to the contrary
or it is clear that resuscitation would be futile
in cases of a mortal injury, such as decapitation,
hemicorporectomy, known prolonged submersion,
incineration, rigor mortis, dependent lividity and
fetal maceration. In such cases, the non-physician
is making a diagnosis of death but is not certifying
death (which can be done only by a physician in
most countries).
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
But what of the decision to abandon a resusci-
tation attempt? Should paramedics trained in ALS
be able to declare death after 20 min of asystole in
the absence of reversible causes, bearing in mind
the very negative results achieved with ongoing
CPR during transport? Opinions vary from country
to country.26 In some countries it is routine, and
it is surely unreasonable to expect paramedics to
continue with resuscitation in the precise circum-
stances where it would be abandoned by a doc-
tor. In making this recommendation, it is essential
that times are recorded very accurately and written
guidelines provided.27 The answer would appear
to lie in superior training and thereafter confi-
dence in those who have been trained to make the
decision.
Similar decisions and a diagnosis of death may
have to be made by nurses in nursing homes
for the aged and terminally ill without a resi-
dent doctor. It is to be hoped that a decision on
the merits of a resuscitation attempt will have
been made previously, and the matter of DNAR
should always be addressed for all patients in these
establishments.
Mitigating circumstances
Certain circumstances, for example hypothermia
at the time of cardiac arrest, will enhance the
chances of recovery without neurological damage,
and the normal prognostic criteria (such as asystole
persisting for more than 20 min) are not applica-
ble. Furthermore, sedative and analgesic drugs may
obscure the assessment of the level of conscious-
ness in the patient who has a return of spontaneous
circulation.
Withdrawal of treatment after a
resuscitation attempt
Prediction of the final neurological outcome in
patients remaining comatose after regaining a
spontaneous circulation is difficult during the first
3 days (see Section 4g). There are no specific clin-
ical signs that can predict outcome in the first few
hours after the return of a spontaneous circulation.
Use of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest
makes attempts at predicting neurological outcome
even more difficult.
In a very small number of distressing cases,
patients regain spontaneous circulation but remain
in persistent vegetative state (PVS). Continued
existence in this state may not be in the patient’s
best interest compared with the alternative of
S175
dying. If remaining alive but in PVS is considered
not to be in the patient’s best interests, consider-
ation must be given to the potential withdrawal of
food and fluids to terminate life. These are pro-
foundly difficult decisions, but generally there is
agreement between relatives and the doctors and
nurses on the correct course of action. In these
cases, decisions can often be made without the
need for legal intervention. Difficulties arise if
there is a disagreement between the doctors and
nurses and the relatives, or between the relatives.
In Europe, although there also may be extreme
views, it seems that the majority are content to
leave the decision to the family and physicians in
private.
Family presence during resuscitation
The concept of a family member being present dur-
ing the resuscitation process was introduced in the
1980s28 and has become accepted practice in many
European countries.29—38 Many relatives would like
to be present during resuscitation attempts and, of
those who have had this experience, over 90% would
wish to do it again.33 Most parents would wish to be
with their child at this time.39
Relatives have considered several benefits from
being permitted to be present during a resuscitation
attempt, including
• help in coming to terms with the reality of death
and easing the bereavement process;
• being able to communicate with, and touch, their
loved one in their final moments while they were
still warm. Many feel that their loved one appre-
ciated their presence at that moment, and this
may be quite possible if consciousness returns
during effective CPR (as has been recorded par-
ticularly with mechanical CPR on occasions);
• feeling that they had been present during the
final moments and that they had been a support
to their loved one when needed;
• feeling that they had been there to see that
everything that could be done, was done.
Several measures are required to ensure that the
experience of the relative is the best under the cir-
cumstances.
• The resuscitation should be seen to be conducted
competently, under good team leadership, with
an open and welcoming attitude to relatives.
• Brief the relatives, in terms that they can under-
stand, before entering; and ensure that contin-
ual support is provided by a member of staff
(usually a nurse) trained in this subject. Ensure
S176
that relatives understand that the choice to be
present is entirely theirs, and do not provoke
feelings of guilt, whatever their decision.
• Make the relatives aware of the procedures
they are likely to see (e.g., tracheal intuba-
tion, insertion of central venous catheters) and
the patient’s response (e.g., convulsive move-
ments after defibrillation). Emphasise the impor-
tance of not interfering with any procedures and
explain clearly the dangers of doing so.
• In the majority, of cases it will be necessary to
explain that the patient has not responded to the
resuscitation attempt and that the attempt has
to be abandoned. This decision should be made
by the team leader, involving the members of the
team. Explain to the relatives that there may be
a brief interval while equipment is removed, and
that then they will be able to return to be with
their loved one at their leisure, alone or sup-
ported, as they wish. Certain tubes and cannulae
may have to be left in place for medicolegal rea-
sons.
• Finally, there should be an opportunity for the
relative to reflect, ask questions about the cause
and the process, and be given advice about the
procedure for registering the death and the sup-
port services available.
In the event of an out-of-hospital arrest, the
relatives may already be present, and possibly per-
forming basic life support (BLS). Offer them the
option to stay; they may appreciate the opportunity
to help and travel in the ambulance to hospital. If
death is pronounced at the scene, offer the rela-
tives the help and support of their family doctor or
community nurse and bereavement councillor.
For resuscitation staff, both in and out hospital,
it is worth offering training in the matter of rela-
tives being present.40
With increasing experience of family presence
during resuscitation attempts, it is clear that prob-
lems rarely, if ever, arise. In the majority of
instances, relatives come in and stay for just a
few minutes and then leave, satisfied that they
have taken the opportunity to be there to sup-
port their loved one and say goodbye as they
would have wished. Ten years ago most staff
would not have countenanced the presence of
relatives during resuscitation, but a recent sur-
vey has shown an increasingly open attitude and
appreciation of the autonomy of both patient and
relatives.1 Perhaps this is related to a generally
more permissive and less autocratic attitude. Inter-
national cultural and social variations still exist,
and must be understood and appreciated with
sensitivity.
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
Training and research on the recently
dead
Another matter that has raised considerable debate
is the ethics, and in some cases the legality,
of undertaking training and/or research on the
recently dead.
Training
The management of resuscitation can be taught
using scenarios with manikins and modern simula-
tors, but training in certain skills required during
resuscitation is notoriously difficult. External chest
compressions and, to an extent, expired air venti-
lation and insertion of oropharyngeal and nasopha-
ryngeal airways can be taught using manikins; but
despite technological advances in manikins and sim-
ulators, many other skills that are needed on a
regular basis during resuscitation can be acquired
satisfactorily only through practice on humans,
dead or alive. These other skills include, for exam-
ple, central and peripheral venous access, arterial
puncture and cannulation, venous cut-down, bag-
mask ventilation, tracheal intubation, cricothy-
roidotomy, needle thoracostomy, chest drainage
and open-chest cardiac massage. Some of these
skills may be practised during routine clinical work,
mostly involving anaesthesia, and to a lesser degree
surgery; but others such as cricothyroidotomy, nee-
dle thoracostomy and open chest cardiac massage
cannot, and are needed only in a life-threatening
emergency when it is difficult to justify a teaching
exercise. In modern day practice, with practition-
ers being called increasingly to account and patient
autonomy prevailing, it is becoming more and more
difficult to obtain permission for student practice of
skills in the living. Gone are the days when admis-
sion to a ‘teaching hospital’ implied automatic con-
sent for students to practise procedures on patients
under supervision as they wished. And yet the pub-
lic expect, and are entitled to, competent practi-
tioners for generation after generation.
So the question arises as to whether it is ethi-
cally and morally appropriate to undertake training
and practice on the living or the dead. There is a
wide diversity of opinion on this matter.41 Many,
particularly those in the Islamic nations, find the
concept of any skills training and practice on the
recently dead completely abhorrent because of an
innate respect for the dead body. Others will accept
the practice of non-invasive procedures that do not
leave a mark, such as tracheal intubation; and some
are open and frank enough to accept that any pro-
cedure may be learned on the dead body with the
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
justification that the learning of skills is paramount
for the well-being of future patients.
One option is to request informed consent for
the procedure from the relative of the deceased.
However, only some will obtain permission,1,40 and
many find this very difficult to do in the harrowing
circumstances of breaking bad news simultaneously
to the recently bereaved. As a result, frequently
only non-invasive procedures are practised, on the
basis that what is not seen will not cause distress.
The days of undertaking any procedure without con-
sent are rapidly coming to an end, and perhaps it
is now becoming increasingly necessary to mount a
publicity campaign to exhort the living to give per-
mission for training on their dead body through an
advance directive, in much the same way as per-
mission for transplant of organs may be given. It
may be that an ‘opt-out’ rather than an ‘opt-in’
arrangement may be adopted, but this will require
changes in the law in most countries. It is advised
that healthcare professionals learn local and hos-
pital policies regarding this issue and follow the
established policy.
Research
There are important ethical issues relating to
undertaking randomized clinical trials for patients
in cardiac arrest who cannot give informed con-
sent to participate in research studies. Progress in
improving the dismal rates of successful resuscita-
tion will only come through the advancement of
science through clinical studies. The utilitarian con-
cept in ethics looks to the greatest good for the
greatest number of people. This must be balanced
with respect for patient autonomy, according to
which patients should not be enrolled in research
studies without their informed consent. Over the
past decade, legal directives have been introduced
into the USA and the European Union42,43 that place
significant barriers to research on patients dur-
ing resuscitation without informed consent from
the patient or immediate relative.44 There are
data showing that such regulations deter research
progress in resuscitation.45 It is indeed possible that
these directives may in themselves conflict with
the basic human right to good medical treatment
as set down in the Helsinki Agreement.12 Research
in resuscitation emanating from the USA has fallen
dramatically in the last decade,46 and it appears
very likely that the European Union will follow
suit as the rules bite there.47 The US authorities
have, to a very limited extent, sought to introduce
methods of exemption,42 but these are still asso-
ciated with problems and almost insurmountable
difficulties.45
S177
Research on the recently dead is likely to
encounter similar restrictions unless previous per-
mission is granted as part of an advance directive
by the patient, or permission can be given imme-
diately by the relative who is next of kin. Legal
ownership of the recently dead is established only
in a few countries, but in many countries it is at
least tacitly agreed that the body ‘belongs’ to the
relatives (unless there are suspicious circumstances
or the cause of death is unknown), and permission
for any research must be granted by the next of kin
unless there is an advance directive giving consent.
Obtaining consent from relatives in the stressful
circumstances of immediate bereavement is unen-
viable and potentially damaging to the relationship
between doctor and relative.
Research can still be carried out during post-
mortem examination, for instance to study the
traumatic damage resulting from the use of spe-
cific methods of chest compression, but all body
parts must be returned to the patient unless spe-
cific permission is obtained from relatives to do
otherwise.
Breaking bad news and bereavement
counselling
Breaking news of the death of a patient to a rel-
ative is an unenviable task. It is a moment that
the relative will remember for ever, so it is very
important to do it as correctly and sensitively as
possible. It also places a considerable stress on the
healthcare provider who has this difficult duty. Both
may need support in the ensuing hours and days. It
is salutatory that the breaking of bad news is sel-
dom taught in medical school or at postgraduate
level.1
Contacting the family in the case of death
without the relatives being present
If the relatives are not present when the patient
dies, they must be contacted as soon as possible.
The caller may not be known to the relative and
must take great care to ensure that his or her
identity is made quite clear to the relative and,
in turn, the caller must make sure of the rela-
tionship of the call recipient to the deceased. In
many cases it is not stated on the telephone that
the patient has actually died, unless the distance
and travel time are prolonged (e.g., the relative
is in another country). Many find that it is better
to say that the patient is seriously and critically
ill or injured and that the relatives should come
to hospital immediately, so that a full explanation
S178
can be given face to face. It is wise to request that
relatives to ask a friend to drive them to hospital,
and to state that nothing will be gained by driving
at speed. When the relatives arrive they should be
greeted right away by a competent and knowledge-
able member of staff, and the situation explained
immediately. Delays in being told the facts are
agonising.
Who should break the bad news to the
relative?
Gone are the days when it was acceptable for the
patronising senior doctor to delegate the breaking
of bad news to a junior assistant. Nowadays, it is
generally agreed that it is the duty of the senior
doctor or the team leader to talk to the relatives.
Nevertheless, it is wise to be accompanied by an
experienced nurse who may be a great comfort for
the patient (and indeed the doctor).
Where and how should bad news be given?
The environment where bad news is given is vitally
important. There should be a room set aside for
relatives of the seriously ill that is tastefully and
comfortably furnished, with free access to a tele-
phone, television and fresh flowers daily (which
may be provided by the florist who runs the flower
shop that is in most hospitals in Europe).
There are some basic principles to be followed
when breaking bad news, that should be adhered to
if grave errors are to be avoided and the relative is
not to be discomforted. It is essential to know the
facts of the case and to make quite sure to whom
who you are talking. Body language is vital; always
sit at the same level as the patient and relative;
do not stand up when they are sitting down. Make
sure you are cleanly dressed; wearing blood-stained
clothing is not good. Do not give the impression
that you are busy and in a hurry. Give the news
they are anxious to hear immediately, using the
words ‘‘dead’’ or ‘‘has died’’, ‘‘I am very sorry to
have to tell you that your father/husband/son has
died’’. Do not leave any room for doubt by using
such phrases as ‘‘passed on’’ or left us’’ or ‘‘gone
up above’’.
Discussing the medical details comprehensively
at this stage is not helpful; wait until they are asked
for. Touching may be appropriate, such as holding
hands or placing an arm on the shoulder, but people
and customs vary and the doctor needs to be aware
of these. Do not be ashamed if you shed a tear your-
self. Allow time for the news to be assimilated by
the relative. Reactions may vary, including
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
• relief (‘‘I am so glad his suffering is over,’’ or
‘‘He went suddenly—–that is what he would have
wished’’);
• anger with the patient (‘‘I told him to stop smok-
ing,’’ or ‘‘He was too fat to play squash,’’ or
‘‘Look at the mess he has left me in’’);
• self-guilt (‘‘If only I had not argued with him this
morning before he left for work,’’ or ‘‘Why did I
not tell the doctor he got chest pain?’’);
• anger with the medical system (‘‘Why did the
ambulance take so long?’’ or ‘‘The doctor was
far too young and did not know what he/she was
doing’’);
• uncontrollable wailing and crying and anguish;
• complete expressionless catatonia.
It may be useful to reassure the family that they
did everything correctly, such as calling for help and
getting to the hospital but, in the vast majority of
cases, healthcare providers are unable to restart
the heart.
Some time may elapse before conversation can
resume and, at this stage, ask relatives if they have
any questions about the medical condition and the
treatment given. It is wise to be completely open
and honest about this, but always say ‘‘He did not
suffer’’.
In the majority of cases the relative will wish
to see the body. It is important that the body and
bedclothes are clean and all tubes and cannulae
are removed, unless these are needed for post-
mortem examination. The image of the body will
leave an impression on the relative that will last for
ever. A post-mortem examination may be required,
and this should requested with tact and sensitiv-
ity, explaining that the procedure will be carried
out by a professional pathologist and will help to
determine the precise cause of death.
Children
Breaking bad news to children may be perceived to
present a special problem, but experience seems
to indicate that it is better to be quite open and
honest with them, so helping to dispel the night-
marish fantasies that children may concoct about
death. It is helpful to contact the school, so that
the teachers and fellow pupils can be prepared to
receive the child back into the school environment
with support and sensitivity.
Closure
In many cases this will be the relative’s first
experience of death, and help should be offered
with the bewildering administration of the official
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
registration of death, funeral arrangements and
socioeconomic support by the hospital or commu-
nity social worker. Depending on religious beliefs,
the hospital padre or priest may have a vital role to
play. Whenever possible, family physicians should
be informed immediately by telephone or e-mail
with the essential details of the case, so that they
can give full support to the relatives. A follow-
up telephone call to the relative a day or two
later from a member of the hospital staff who
was involved, offering to be of help and to answer
any questions that the relative may have forgotten
about at the time, is always appreciated.
Staff debrief
Although many members of staff seem, and often
are, little affected by death in the course of their
work, this should not be assumed. Their sense
of accomplishment and job satisfaction may be
affected adversely, and there may be feelings of
guilt, inadequacy and failure. This may be particu-
larly apparent in, but not restricted to, very junior
members of staff. A team debrief of the event
using positive and constructive critique techniques
should be conducted and personal bereavement
counselling offered to those with a particular need.
How this is done will vary with the individual and
will range from an informal chat in the pub or cafe
(which seems to deal effectively with many cases)
to professional counselling. It should be explained
that distress after a death at work may be a normal
reaction to an abnormal situation.
Conclusions
Resuscitation has given many a new lease of life,
to the delight of themselves and their relatives,
but has the potential to bring misery to a few. This
chapter addresses how that misery can be reduced
by not attempting resuscitation in inappropriate
circumstances or in cases with a valid advanced
directive, and when to discontinue the resuscita-
tion attempt in cases of futility or PVS.
Ethical issues such as training and research on
the recently dead, and the presence of family mem-
bers during the resuscitation attempt, place fur-
ther burdens on the medical profession but must be
dealt with sympathetically, and with an apprecia-
tion of growing patient autonomy and human rights
throughout the world.
Finally, the breaking of bad news is one of the
most difficult tasks to be faced by the medical and
nursing professions. It requires time, training, com-
passion and understanding.
S179
References
1. Baskett PJ, Lim A. The varying ethical attitudes towards
resuscitation in Europe. Resuscitation 2004;62:267—73.
2. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, et al. End-of-life practices
in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA
2003;290:790—7.
3. Richter J, Eisemann MR, Bauer B, Kreibeck H, Astrom S.
Decision-making in the treatment of elderly people: a cross-
cultural comparison between Swedish and German physi-
cians and nurses. Scand J Caring Sci 2002;16:149—56.
4. da Costa DE, Ghazal H, Al Khusaiby S. Do not resuscitate
orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care
unit in a Muslim community. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal
Ed 2002;86:F115—9.
5. Ho NK. Decision-making: initiation and withdrawing life sup-
port in the asphyxiated infants in developing countries. Sin-
gapore Med J 2001;42:402—5.
6. Richter J, Eisemann M, Zgonnikova E. Doctors’ authori-
tarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A compari-
son between Russia, Sweden and Germany. J Med Ethics
2001;27:186—91.
7. Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M, et al. End-of-life decisions in
neonatal intensive care: physicians’ self-reported practices
in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group. Lancet
2000;355:2112—8.
8. Konishi E. Nurses’ attitudes towards developing a do not
resuscitate policy in Japan. Nurs Ethics 1998;5:218—27.
9. Muller JH, Desmond B. Ethical dilemmas in a cross-cultural
context. A Chinese example. West J Med 1992;157:323—7.
10. Edgren E. The ethics of resuscitation; differences between
Europe and the USA-Europe should not adopt American
guidelines without debate. Resuscitation 1992;23:85—9.
11. Beauchamp TL, Childress J, editors. Principles of biomedical
ethics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
12. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical
research involving human subjects adopted by the 18th WMA
General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 and amended
at the 29th, 35th, 41st, 48th, and 52nd WMA Assemblies.
Geneva, 1964.
13. Aasland OG, Forde R, Steen PA. Medical end-of-life decisions
in Norway. Resuscitation 2003;57:312—3.
14. Danciu SC, Klein L, Hosseini MM, Ibrahim L, Coyle BW, Kehoe
RF. A predictive model for survival after in-hospital car-
diopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation 2004;62:35—42.
15. Dautzenberg PL, Broekman TC, Hooyer C, Schonwetter RS,
Duursma SA. Review: patient-related predictors of car-
diopulmonary resuscitation of hospitalized patients. Age
Ageing 1993;22:464—75.
16. Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ, Niemann JT. Prediction rules for esti-
mating neurologic outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac
arrest. Resuscitation 2004;63:145—55.
17. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist KA, Holm-
berg S. Can we define patients with no chance of survival
after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Heart 2004;90:1114—8.
18. Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Angquist KA, Young M,
Holmberg S. Factors associated with an increased chance
of survival among patients suffering from an out-of-hospital
cardiac arrest in a national perspective in Sweden. Am Heart
J 2005;149:61—6.
19. Ebell MH. Prearrest predictors of survival following in-
hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. J
Fam Pract 1992;34:551—8.
20. Hillman K, Parr M, Flabouris A, Bishop G, Stewart A. Redefin-
ing in-hospital resuscitation: the concept of the medical
emergency team. Resuscitation 2001;48:105—10.
S180
21. The MERIT study investigators. Introduction of the medical
emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised con-
trolled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2091—7.
22. Sovik O, Naess AC. Incidence and content of written guide-
lines for ‘‘do not resuscitate’’ orders. Survey at six dif-
ferent somatic hospitals in Oslo. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen
1997;117:4206—9.
23. Bonnin MJ, Pepe PE, Kimball KT, Clark Jr PS. Distinct cri-
teria for termination of resuscitation in the out-of-hospital
setting. JAMA 1993;270:1457—62.
24. Kellermann AL, Hackman BB, Somes G. Predicting the out-
come of unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life sup-
port. JAMA 1993;270:1433—6.
25. Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjoberg T. Evaluation
of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compres-
sion and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation
2002;55:285—99.
26. Naess A, Steen E, Steen P. Ethics in treatment deci-
sions during out-of-hospital resuscitation. Resuscitation
1997;35:245—56.
27. Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee. Newslet-
ter 1996 and 2001. Royal College of Physicians: London.
28. Doyle CJ, Post H, Burney RE, Maino J, Keefe M, Rhee KJ. Fam-
ily participation during resuscitation: an option. Ann Emerg
Med 1987;16:673—5.
29. Adams S, Whitlock M, Higgs R, Bloomfield P, Baskett PJ.
Should relatives be allowed to watch resuscitation? BMJ
1994;308:1687—92.
30. Hanson C, Strawser D. Family presence during cardiopul-
monary resuscitation: Foote Hospital emergency depart-
ment’s nine-year perspective. J Emerg Nurs 1992;18:104—6.
31. Cooke MW. I desperately needed to see my son. BMJ
1991;302:1023.
32. Gregory CM. I should have been with Lisa as she died. Accid
Emerg Nurs 1995;3:136—8.
33. Boie ET, Moore GP, Brummett C, Nelson DR. Do parents want
to be present during invasive procedures performed on their
children in the emergency department? A survey of 400 par-
ents. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:70—4.
34. Boudreaux ED, Francis JL, Loyacano T. Family presence dur-
ing invasive procedures and resuscitations in the emergency
department: a critical review and suggestions for future
research. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40:193—205.
35. Martin J. Rethinking traditional thoughts. J Emerg Nurs
1991;17:67—8.
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
36. Robinson SM, Mackenzie-Ross S, Campbell Hewson GL, Egle-
ston CV, Prevost AT. Psychological effect of witnessed
resuscitation on bereaved relatives. Lancet 1998;352:614—7
[comment].
37. Baskett PJF. The ethics of resuscitation. In: Colquhoun MC,
Handley AJ, Evans TR, editors. The ABC of resuscitation. 5th
ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2004.
38. Azoulay E, Sprung CL. Family-physician interactions in the
intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004;32:2323—8.
39. Bouchner H, Vinci R, Waring C. Pediatric procedures: do par-
ents want to watch? Pediatrics 1989;84:907—9.
40. Resuscitation Council (UK) Project Team. Should relatives
witness resuscitation? London, UK: Resuscitation Council;
1996.
41. Morag RM, DeSouza S, Steen PA, et al. Performing procedures
on the newly deceased for teaching purposes: what if we
were to ask? Arch Intern Med 2005;165:92—6.
42. US Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of
human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed
consent requirements in certain emergency circumstances.
In: 61 Federal Register 51528 (1996) codified at CFR #50.24
and #46.408; 1996.
43. Fontaine N, Rosengren B. Directive/20/EC of the European
Parliament and Council of 4th April 2001 on the approxima-
tion of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions
of the Member States relating to the implementation of
good clinical practice in the conduct of trials on medical
products for human use. Off J Eur Commun 2001;121:34—
44.
44. Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J, et al. The European Union
Directive on Clinical Research: present status of imple-
mentation in EU member states’ legislations with regard
to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:
476—9.
45. Nichol G, Huszti E, Rokosh J, Dumbrell A, McGowan J, Becker
L. Impact of informed consent requirements on cardiac
arrest research in the United States: exception from consent
or from research? Resuscitation 2004;62:3—23.
46. Mosesso Jr VN, Brown LH, Greene HL, et al. Conducting
research using the emergency exception from informed con-
sent: the public access defibrillation (PAD) trial experience.
Resuscitation 2004;61:29—36.
47. Sterz F, Singer EA, Bottiger B, et al. A serious threat to
evidence based resuscitation within the European Union.
Resuscitation 2002;53:237—8.
Resuscitation (2005) 67S1, S181—S189
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for
Resuscitation 2005
Section 9. Principles of training in resuscitation
Peter J. F. Baskett, Jerry P. Nolan, Anthony Handley, Jasmeet Soar,
Dominique Biarent, Sam Richmond
Introduction
There are a variety of methods used for train-
ing in resuscitation. None are perfect and, in the
absence of frequent practice, retention of knowl-
edge and skills is suboptimal. The optimal inter-
val for retraining has not been established, but
repeated refresher training at intervals of less than
6 months seems to be needed for most individuals
who are not undertaking resuscitation on a regular
basis.1—12
Objectives
The objective of training is to equip the learner
with the ability to be able to undertake resuscita-
tion in a real clinical situation at the level at which
they would be expected to perform, be they be lay
bystander, first responder in the community or hos-
pital, a healthcare professional working in an acute
area, or a member of the medical emergency or
cardiac arrest response team.
Methods
Training should follow the principles of adult edu-
cation and learning. Generally this will mean an
0300-9572/$ — see front matter © 2005 European Resuscitation Council. All Rights Reserved. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.006
established European Resuscitation Council (ERC)
course with small-group (four to eight mem-
bers) participation using interactive discussion and
hands-on practice for skills and clinical scenar-
ios for problem-solving and team leadership.13
The ratio of instructors to candidates should
range from 1:3 to 1:6, depending on the type of
course.
Core knowledge should be acquired by candi-
dates before the course by study of the course
manual or an interactive CD designed for the pur-
pose. The course should aim to produce an improve-
ment in competence in the learner, and there
should be a test of core knowledge and an ongoing
assessment of practical skills and scenario manage-
ment. Sophisticated manikins, simulators and vir-
tual reality techniques may be incorporated into
the scenario-based training.14
For basic life support (BLS) by lay people or first
responders, home-based learning using a video or
interactive CD with a simple manikin may offer
a valuable alternative to traditional instructor-
based courses.15—19 This method minimises candi-
date disruption and instructor time and finances.
However, the role of the instructor should not be
underestimated and, in addition to explaining situ-
ations that were unforeseen on the original video
or CD, the instructor can act as a role model
and provide invaluable enthusiasm and motivation.
S182
Group participation has also been demonstrated to
enhance the overall learning process.
Ethos
The course should be taught by trained instruc-
tors who have undertaken the relevant specific ERC
course in teaching and assessment. Teaching should
be conducted by encouragement with construc-
tive feedback on performance rather than humil-
iation. First names are encouraged among both
faculty and candidates to reduce apprehension,
and the mentor/mentee system is used to enhance
feedback and support for the candidate. Stress is
inevitable,20 particularly during assessment, but
the aim of the instructors is to enable the candi-
dates to do their best.
Language
Initially, the ERC courses were taught in English by
an international faculty.13 As local instructors have
been trained, and manuals and course materials
have been translated into different languages, the
courses, particularly the provider courses, are now
taught increasingly in the candidates’ native lan-
guage.
Instructors
A tried and tested method has evolved for identify-
ing and training instructors.
Identification of instructor potentials
Instructors will be individuals who, in the opinion of
the faculty, have demonstrated good competence
in the subjects at a provider course and, impor-
tantly, have shown qualities of leadership and clin-
ical credibility and skills that involve being articu-
late, supportive and motivated. These individuals
will be invited to take part in an instructor course
called the Generic Instructor Course (GIC) in the
case of Advanced Life Support (ALS) and European
Paediatric Life Support (EPLS) courses, or Basic
Life Support (BLS)/Automated External Defibrilla-
tion (AED) Instructor Course in the BLS and AED
courses. An instructor course for Immediate Life
Support (ILS) is under development.
The instructor courses
These are conducted for instructor potentials (IPs)
by experienced instructors and, in the case of the
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
GIC, include an educator who has undertaken spe-
cific training in medical educational practice and
the principles of adult learning. Details of these
instructor courses are given below. There are no
formal tests for candidates during the course, but
assessment is done by the faculty and feedback is
given as appropriate.
Instructor candidate stage
Following successful completion of an instructor
course, the individual is designated as an instruc-
tor candidate (IC), normally taught on two separate
courses under supervision, and is given constructive
feedback on performance. After experience of two
courses, the IC normally progresses to full instruc-
tor status, but occasionally the faculty decides that
a further course is required or, rarely, that the can-
didate is not suitable to progress to be an instructor.
An appeal can be lodged with the relevant Inter-
national Course Committee, which makes the final
decision.
Course director status
Selected individuals may progress to the status of
the course director. They will be selected by their
peers and approved by the relevant committee of
the National Resuscitation Council or the relevant
International Course Committee. Course directors
must be relatively senior individuals with consider-
able clinical credibility, good judgement and impec-
cable powers of assessment and fairness. They will
have embraced the educational principles inher-
ent in the instructor course. Normally, individuals
will have had experience of teaching on at least six
courses and will have been appointed course codi-
rector on at least one occasion.
Interchange of instructors
Interchange between instructors of different dis-
ciplines is possible. For instance, an ALS instruc-
tor may proceed directly to be an IC on an EPLS
course, provided that he or she has passed the EPLS
course and has been identified as an IP and vice
versa. There is no need to repeat the GIC. Simi-
larly, current instructors in the Advanced Trauma
Life Support (ATLS) Course of the American Col-
lege of Surgeons, having been identified as an IP in
the relevant provider course, may proceed directly
to being an IC in ALS or EPLS. Current American
Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support
(ACLS) or Paediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS)
instructors may proceed directly to IC status in the
relevant course.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
Code of conduct
All instructors must adhere to the code of conduct
for the instructors, which is set out in Appendix A.
The Basic Life Support (BLS) and
Automated External Defibrillator (AED)
courses
BLS and AED courses are appropriate for a wide
range of providers. These may include clinical and
non-clinical healthcare professionals (particularly
those who are less likely to be faced with having
to manage a cardiac arrest), general practitioners,
dentists, medical students, first-aid workers, life-
guards, those with a duty of care for others (such
as school teachers and care workers), and members
of first-responder schemes, as well as members of
the general public.
Provider course format
The aim of these provider courses is to enable each
candidate to gain competency in BLS or the use
of AED. Details of appropriate competencies have
been published by the ERC BLS Working Group and
may be found on http://www.erc.edu. BLS and AED
courses are developed and managed by the ERC
International BLS Course Committee (ICC).
Each BLS or AED provider course lasts approx-
imately half a day and consists of skill demon-
strations and hands-on practice, with a minimum
number of lectures. The recommended ratio of
instructors to candidates is 1:6, with at least one
manikin and one AED for each group of six candi-
dates. Formal assessment is not usually undertaken,
but each candidate receives individual feedback on
performance. Those who need a certificate of com-
petency for professional or personal use may be
assessed continuously during the course or defini-
tively at the end.
BLS provider and AED provider manuals, together
with certificates, may be purchased from the ERC.
Approved alternative manuals, translated if neces-
sary into the local language, may also be used.
Instructor course
Many of the candidates attending a BLS or AED
provider course are lay people, and some subse-
quently want to become instructors themselves. For
this reason, the ERC has developed a 1-day BLS/AED
instructor course. Candidates for this course must
be healthcare professionals, or lay people who hold
the ERC BLS or AED provider certificate and are des-
S183
ignated as IP. The aim is to be as inclusive as possible
regarding the course attendance, the over-riding
criterion being that all candidates should have the
potential and knowledge to teach the subject.
The BLS/AED instructor course follows the prin-
ciples of the GIC, with an emphasis on teaching
lay people. Following successful completion of the
course, each candidate becomes an IC and teaches
two BLS or AED courses before becoming a full
instructor.
Introducing courses into a country
Many ERC BLS and AED provider courses are run by,
or under the control of, the National Resuscitation
Council. The normal procedure for introducing ERC
BLS/AED courses into a country is that ERC interna-
tional instructors visit that country to run a 2-day
combined BLS provider, AED provider and BLS/AED
instructor course. If there are local instructors
(e.g., those who have passed an ERC course suc-
cessfully, or who are ERC ALS instructors), they
teach on the course in a 1:1 ratio of international to
local instructor, with the course director (an inter-
national instructor) as an additional person who can
support local instructors. After a successful course
the local instructors become full ERC instructors,
and the outstanding local instructors are selected
to become instructor trainers. Subsequent courses
are normally held in the language of the country
concerned, and training materials are translated
into that language. The candidates who are on the
combined course qualify, hopefully, as ERC BLS/AED
ICs. They then need to teach on one or two provider
courses, under the supervision of full instructors,
before becoming full instructors themselves.
The Immediate Life Support (ILS) course
The ILS course is for the majority of healthcare
professionals who attend cardiac arrests rarely
but have the potential to be first responders
or cardiac-arrest team members.21 The course
teaches the healthcare professionals the skills that
are most likely to result in successful resusci-
tation while awaiting the arrival of the resusci-
tation team.22 Importantly, the ILS course also
includes a section on preventing cardiac arrest,
and complements other short courses that focus on
managing sick patients in the first 24 h of critical ill-
ness when critical care expertise is not immediately
available.23—25 There is a large group of potential
candidates including nurses, nursing students, doc-
tors, medical students, dentists, physiotherapists,
radiographers and cardiac technicians.
S184
Current ALS instructors and ICs can teach and
assess on ILS courses. There is also a pilot project
underway to develop specific ILS instructors. There
must be at least 1 instructor for every 6 can-
didates, with a maximum of 30 candidates on a
course.
Course format
The ILS course is delivered over 1 day and comprises
lectures, hands-on skills teaching and cardiac-
arrest scenario teaching (CASTeach) using manikins.
The programme includes a number of options that
allow instructors to tailor the course to their can-
didate group.
Course content
The course covers those skills that are most likely
to result in successful resuscitation: causes and pre-
vention of cardiac arrest, starting CPR, basic airway
skills and defibrillation (AED or manual). There are
options to include the teaching of the laryngeal
mask airway and drug treatments during cardiac
arrest. Once all the skills have been covered, there
is a cardiac arrest demonstration by the instruc-
tors that outlines the first-responder role to the
candidates. This is followed by the CASTeach sta-
tion where candidates practise. ILS candidates are
not usually expected to undertake the role of the
team leader. Candidates should be able to start
a resuscitation attempt and continue until more
experienced help arrives. When appropriate, the
instructor takes over as a resuscitation team leader.
This is not always necessary, as in some scenarios
resuscitation may be successful before more expe-
rienced help arrives. Set scenarios are used that
are adapted to the workplace and the clinical role
of the candidate.
Assessment
Candidate’s performances are assessed contin-
uously and they must show their competence
throughout the ILS course. There are no formal
testing stations, removing the threat associated
with spot testing at the end of the course. Candi-
dates are sent the assessment forms with the pre-
course materials. The forms indicate clearly how
their performance will be measured against a pre-
determined criteria. Assessment on the ILS course
enables the candidate to see what is expected and
frame learning around achievement of these out-
comes. The following practical skills are assessed on
the ILS course: airway management, BLS and defib-
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
rillation. With a supportive approach, the major-
ity of candidates achieve the course learning out-
comes.
Equipment
The ILS course is designed to be straightforward
to run. Most courses are conducted in hospitals
with small groups of candidates (average 12 can-
didates). The course requires lecture facilities and
a skills teaching area for each group of six candi-
dates. There needs to be at least one ALS manikin
for every six candidates. The course should be suit-
able for local needs. Course centres should try
as far as possible to train candidates to use the
equipment (e.g., defibrillator type) that is available
locally.
Course report and results sheet
A course report and the results sheet are compiled
by the course director and filed with the National
Resuscitation Council and the ERC.
The Advanced Life Support (ALS) course
The target candidates for this course are doctors
and senior nurses working in emergency areas of
the hospital and those who may be members of
the medical emergency or cardiac arrest teams.26
The course is also suitable for senior paramedics
and certain hospital technicians. The ILS course is
more suitable for first-responder nurses, doctors
who rarely encounter cardiac arrest in their prac-
tice, and emergency medical technicians. Up to 32
candidates can be accommodated on the course,
with a ratio of at least 1 instructor for every 3 can-
didates. Up to a maximum of 50% of the instructors
may be ICs. Groups for teaching should not exceed
eight candidates and should be six ideally. Each
instructor acts as a mentor for a small group of can-
didates. The course normally lasts for two to two
and a half days.
Course format
The course format has very few formal lectures
(four), and teaching concentrates on hands-on
skills, clinically based scenarios in small groups with
emphasis on the team leader approach and interac-
tive group discussions. Mentor/mentee sessions are
included, to allow candidates to give and receive
feedback. Faculty meetings are held at the begin-
ning of the course and at the end of each day of the
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
course. Social occasions, such as course and faculty
dinners, add greatly to the course interaction and
enjoyment.
Course content
The course content is based on the current
ERC guidelines for resuscitation. Candidates are
expected to have studied the ALS course manual
carefully before the course.
The course aims to train candidates to highlight
the causes of cardiac arrest, identify sick patients in
danger of deterioration and manage cardiac arrest
and the immediate periarrest problems encoun-
tered in and around the first hour or so of the event.
It is not a course in advanced intensive care or car-
diology. Competence in BLS is expected before the
candidate enrols for the course.
Emphasis is placed on the techniques of safe
defibrillation and ECG interpretation, the manage-
ment of the airway and ventilation, the manage-
ment of periarrest rhythms, simple acid/base bal-
ance and special circumstances relating to car-
diac arrest. Post-resuscitation care, ethical aspects
related to resuscitation and care of the bereaved
are included in the course.
Assessment and testing
Each candidate is assessed individually and
reviewed at the end of each day by the faculty
at their meeting. Feedback is given as required.
There is a testing scenario towards the end of
the course, and an on going assessment of the
management of the sick patient and the need
to be able to defibrillate effectively and safely.
There is a multiple-choice question paper taken
at the end of the course to test core knowledge.
Candidates are required to achieve 75% to pass this
test.
Course venue and equipment
The course requires four practical rooms, a lecture
room, a faculty room and facilities for lunches and
refreshments. At least two digital projectors and
computers and up to four flip charts are needed.
The practical rooms each should have an adult ALS
manikin with ECG simulator and a defibrillator. Four
adult airway manikins are required, together with
the equipment for simple airway care and ventila-
tion, tracheal intubation and placing a supraglot-
tic airway, such as the laryngeal mask. Intravenous
cannulae, syringes, infusion fluids and simulated
drugs make up the list.
S185
Course report and results sheet
A course report and the results sheet are compiled
by the course director and filed with the national
resuscitation council and the ERC.
The European Paediatric Life Support
(EPLS) course
The EPLS course is designed for healthcare workers
who are involved in the resuscitation of a newborn,
an infant or a child whether in or out of hospital
The course aims at providing caregivers with the
knowledge and skills for the management of the
critically ill child during the first hour of illness
and to prevent progression of diseases to cardiac
arrest.
Competence in basic paediatric life support is a
prerequisite, although a 90-min refresher course on
BLS and relief of foreign-body airway obstruction
is included. The EPLS course is suitable for doc-
tors, nurses, emergency medical technicians and
paramedics, etc., who have a duty to respond
to sick newborns, infants and children in their
practice.27,28 EPLS is not a course in neonatal or
paediatric intensive care aimed at the advanced
providers.
The course can accommodate 24 candidates with
a ratio of at least 1 instructor for every 4 candi-
dates. In exceptional circumstances, 28 candidates
may be accepted with extra instructors. Experi-
ence in paediatrics is necessary to keep scenarios
realistic and to answer candidates’ questions, so
a minimum of 50% of the faculty must have regu-
lar experience in neonatal or paediatric practice.
Up to a maximum of 50% of the instructors may be
ICs. Groups for teaching should not exceed eight
candidates and ideally should be five or six; two
instructors act as mentors for a group of five to
seven candidates. The course normally lasts for two
to two and a half days.
Course format
The new course format has fewer formal lectures
(three). Teaching of knowledge and skills is given
in small groups using clinically based scenarios.
The emphasis is on assessment and treatment of
the sick child, team working and leadership. For-
mal mentor/mentee sessions are included, to allow
candidates to give and receive feedback. Faculty
meetings are held at the beginning of the course
and at the end of each day of the course. Feedback
is also given to ICs after each series of workshops
and after their lectures.
S186
Course content
The course content follows the current ERC guide-
lines for neonatal and paediatric resuscitation. The
course candidates are expected to have studied the
manual before attending the course. In the future
they also may receive a CD or a DVD for home
training in BLS.15 A precourse MCQ is sent with the
manual to candidates 4—6 weeks before the course.
It is collected at the beginning and feedback is given
during the course.
The EPLS is aimed at training the candidates
to understand the causes and mechanisms of car-
diorespiratory arrest in neonates and children, to
recognise and treat the critically ill neonate, infant
or child and to manage cardiac arrest if it occurs.
Skills taught include airway management, bag-mask
ventilation, log roll and cervical collar placement,
oxygen delivery, an introduction to intubation and
vascular access, safe defibrillation, cardioversion
and AED use.
Each candidate is assessed individually and
reviewed by the faculty. Feedback is given as
required. A BLS assessment follows the BLS
refresher course, and a second scenario-based test
at the end of the course emphasises the assess-
ment of the sick child and the core skills. There is a
multiple-choice question paper taken at the end of
the course to test the core knowledge. Candidates
are required to achieve 75% to pass this test.
Course venue and equipment
The course requires four practical rooms, a lecture
room, a faculty room and facilities for lunches and
refreshments. At least one digital projector and
computer and up to four flip charts are needed.
Paediatric manikins (infant and child for basic and
advanced techniques) and adjuncts must be avail-
able in each classroom. One defibrillator, one AED
and one rhythms simulator device must also be
available.
Course report and results sheet
A course report and the results sheet are compiled
by the course director and filed with the national
resuscitation council and the ERC.
The Newborn Life Support (NLS) course
This course is designed for health workers likely to
be present at the birth of a baby in the course of
their job. It aims to give those who may be called
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
upon to start resuscitation at birth the background
knowledge and skills to approach the management
of the newborn infant during the first 10—20 min
in a competent manner. The course is suitable for
midwives, nurses and doctors and, like most such
courses, works best with candidates from a mixture
of specialties.
The course is usually conducted over 1 day and
runs best with 24 candidates, though up to 32 may
be permitted. There should be one instructor for
every three candidates in addition to the course
director.
Course format
The NLS manual is sent to each of the candidates 4
weeks before the course. Each candidate receives
a multiple-choice questionnaire, with the manual
and is asked to complete this and bring it to the
course. There are two 30-min and two 15-min lec-
tures. The candidates are then divided into four
groups and pass through three workstations before
lunch. The afternoon is taken up by a demonstra-
tion scenario, followed by 2 h of scenario teach-
ing in small groups and finally a theoretical and
practical assessment by an MCQ and an individual
practical airway test. The course concentrates on
airway management but also covers chest compres-
sion, umbilical venous access and drugs.
Course venue and equipment
The venue requires a lecture room, four good-
sized practical rooms, a faculty room and facilities
for lunch and refreshments. A digital projector is
required in the lecture theatre and a flip chart or
a black/white board in each practical room. Ide-
ally, one of the practical rooms should have hand-
washing facilities. At least four infant BLS and four
infant ALS manikins (ideally six of each) should be
available, as well as other airway adjuncts. Four
Resuscitaires, ideally complete with gas cylinders,
should also be available.
Course report and results sheet
A course report and results sheet are compiled by
the course director and lodged with the national
resuscitation council and the ERC.
The Generic Instructor Course (GIC)
This course is for candidates who have been rec-
ommended as IP, emanating from the ALS or EPLS
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
provider courses. In some, the MIMMS course is
undertaken under the auspices of the ALSG, and
IPs from that course may take the GIC to qualify
as ICs for teaching that course. There should be a
maximum of 24 candidates, with a ratio of at least
1 instructor to 3 candidates. Instructors must all
be fully experienced ERC instructors, not ICs. A key
person is the educator. Groups should not exceed six
candidates. The emphasis of the course is on devel-
oping instruction skills. Core knowledge of the orig-
inal provider course is assumed. The course lasts for
two to two and a half days.
Course format
The course format is largely interactive. The edu-
cator plays a key role and leads many of the discus-
sions and feedback. There is one formal lecture on
effective teaching and adult learning, conducted
by the educator. This lecture is interspersed with
group activities. The remainder of the course is
conducted in small group discussions and skill- and
scenario-based hands-on sessions.
Mentor/mentee sessions are included, and there
is a faculty meeting at the beginning of the course
and at the end of each day.
Course content
The course concentrates on teaching techniques
and skills. Candidates are expected to have stud-
ied the GIC manual carefully before the course
(reference manual). The theoretical background of
adult learning and effective teaching is covered
by the educator at the beginning of the course.
The features of PowerPoint and the flip chart are
demonstrated, and candidates have an opportunity
to present a 5-min lecture and are given personal
feedback on their performance. The principle of
equipment familiarisation, followed by a demon-
stration by the faculty with subsequent candidate
practice, is followed in all aspects of the course.
The teaching of skills is based on the four-stage
approach. Scenario-based sessions use scenarios
from the candidate’s original provider course.
Emphasis is placed on the role of the instructor
throughout this teaching day, and each candidate
has the opportunity to adopt the instructor role.
Constructive feedback is a key element of the
instructor role.
During the second day, the emphasis moves
to assessment and, after demonstrations by the
faculty, all candidates are offered the opportu-
nity to act in the instructor assessor role for the
assessment of skills and scenario leadership. Fur-
ther sessions include the conduct of open and
S187
closed discussions and the role and qualities of the
instructor.
Assessment
Each candidate has ongoing assessment by the fac-
ulty throughout the course. Candidates’ perfor-
mances and attitudes are discussed at the daily
faculty meetings and feedback is given as required.
Successful candidates may proceed to the status of
IC.
Course venue and equipment
This is as for the original provider course. If the
candidates come from mixed backgrounds, then a
variety of equipment is required.
Course report and results sheet
A course report is compiled by the course director
and the educator. This and the results sheet are
filed with the national resuscitation council and the
ERC.
The Educator Master Class (EMC)
This course, normally held annually, is designed for
those aspiring to become medical educators for the
GIC. Suitable candidates are selected by the fac-
ulty, and generally must have a background and
qualification in medical education or must have
demonstrated a special commitment to educational
practice over a number of years. They should have
experience of a provider course and a GIC, and
should have studied the background reading for the
course.
The instructors for the course are experienced
educators. A maximum of 18 candidates can be
accommodated with 6 instructors. The groups
should comprise a maximum of six candidates. The
course lasts just under 2 days.
Course format
The course consists mainly of closed discussion
groups for the whole course, led by one or two
of the instructors, together with break-out small
group discussions and problem solving.
Course content
The course covers the theoretical framework for
medical educators, assessment and quality control,
S188
teaching methodologies, critical appraisal, the role
of the mentor, multiprofessional education strate-
gies and continued development of the medical
educator.
Assessment
Each candidate has ongoing assessment by the fac-
ulty throughout the course. Individual progress is
discussed at a faculty meeting at the end of each
day, and candidates are given the feedback as
appropriate. Successful candidates may proceed to
the status of educator candidate (EC), where they
will be supervised and assessed by an experienced
educator and course director until it is decided
whether or not they will be suitable educators to
work on their own.
Course venue and equipment
The course venue requires a lecture room and three
break-out rooms. A digital projector and three flip
charts are needed; no manikins are required.
Course report and results
The course director compiles a course report after
consultation with the faculty. This, and the results
sheet, are conveyed to the educator’s national
resuscitation council and the ERC.
Appendix A. European Resuscitation
Council Code of Conduct
The Code of Conduct applies to all who instruct, or
otherwise assist, at courses held under the auspices
of the ERC.
It is essential that these individuals
• fully understand that accreditation, and contin-
uing accreditation, of the individual instructor or
assistant is dependent on observing this code as
well as completing the necessary requirements
for re-certification
• ensure that courses approved by the ERC are run
in accordance with the ethos and regulations cur-
rently in force using the manuals, slides and other
materials to ensure that consistent standards of
attitude, knowledge and skills are achieved
• behave at all times while participating in courses
or social events related to the courses, which are
run under the auspices of the ERC, in a respon-
sible manner and observe and other applicable
professional codes of conduct
P.J.F. Baskett et al.
• cooperate with other instructors, educators and
administrators (the faculty) and recognise and
respect their individual contributions
• avoid any abuse of their position and maintain
confidentiality about candidates’ results and per-
formance.
References
1. Makker R, Gray-Siracusa K, Evers M. Evaluation of advanced
cardiac life support in a community teaching hospital by use
of actual cardiac arrests. Heart Lung 1995;24:116—20.
2. Anthonypillai F. Retention of advanced cardiopulmonary
resuscitation knowledge by intensive care trained nurses.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1992;8:180—4.
3. Azcona LA, Gutierrez GE, Fernandez CJ, Natera OM, Ruiz-
Speare O, Ali J. Attrition of advanced trauma life support
(ATLS) skills among ATLS instructors and providers in Mexico.
J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:372—7.
4. Birnbaum ML, Robinson NE, Kuska BM, Stone HL, Fryback
DG, Rose JH. Effect of advanced cardiac life-support train-
ing in rural, community hospitals. Crit Care Med 1994;22:
741—9.
5. Hammond F, Saba M, Simes T, Cross R. Advanced life support:
retention of registered nurses’ knowledge 18 months after
initial training. Aust Crit Care 2000;13:99—104.
6. Kaye W, Mancini ME, Rallis SF. Advanced cardiac life support
refresher course using standardized objective-based mega
code testing. Crit Care Med 1987;15:55—60.
7. Kaye W, Wynne G, Marteau T, et al. An advanced resuscita-
tion training course for preregistration house officers. J R
Coll Physicians Lond 1990;24:51—4.
8. O’Steen DS, Kee CC, Minick MP. The retention of advanced
cardiac life support knowledge among registered nurses. J
Nurs Staff Dev 1996;12:66—72.
9. Schwid HA, O’Donnell D. Anesthesiologists’ manage-
ment of simulated critical incidents. Anesthesiology
1992;76:495—501.
10. Young R, King L. An evaluation of knowledge and skill reten-
tion following an in-house advanced life support course. Nurs
Crit Care 2000;5:7—14.
11. Stross JK. Maintaining competency in advanced cardiac life
support skills. JAMA 1983;249:3339—41.
12. Su E, Schmidt TA, Mann NC, Zechnich AD. A randomized con-
trolled trial to assess decay in acquired knowledge among
paramedics completing a pediatric resuscitation course.
Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:779—86.
13. Baskett P. Progress of the advanced life support courses in
Europe and beyond. Resuscitation 2004;62:311—3.
14. Chamberlain DA, Hazinski MF. Education in resuscitation.
Resuscitation 2003;59:11—43.
15. Braslow A, Brennan RT, Newman MM, Bircher NG, Batcheller
AM, Kaye W. CPR training without an instructor: develop-
ment and evaluation of a video self-instructional system
for effective performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Resuscitation 1997;34:207—20.
16. Todd KH, Braslow A, Brennan RT, et al. Randomized, con-
trolled trial of video self-instruction versus traditional CPR
training. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:364—9.
17. Todd KH, Heron SL, Thompson M, Dennis R, O’Connor J,
Kellermann AL. Simple CPR: a randomized, controlled trial of
video self-instructional cardiopulmonary resuscitation train-
ing in an African American church congregation. Ann Emerg
Med 1999;34:730—7.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005
18. Batcheller AM, Brennan RT, Braslow A, Urrutia A, Kaye W.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of subjects over
forty is better following half-hour video self-instruction com-
pared to traditional four-hour classroom training. Resuscita-
tion 2000;43:101—10.
19. Lynch B, Einspruch E, Nichol G, Becker L, Aufderheide T, Idris
A. Effectiveness of a 30-minute CPR self-instruction program
for lay responders: a controlled randomized study. Resusci-
tation 2005;67:31—43.
20. Sandroni C, Fenici P, Cavallaro F, Bocci MG, Scapigliati
A, Antonelli M. Haemodynamic effects of mental
stress during cardiac arrest simulation testing on
advanced life support courses. Resuscitation 2005;66:39—
44.
21. Soar J, Perkins GD, Harris S, Nolan JP. The immediate life
support course. Resuscitation 2003;57:21—6.
22. Soar J, McKay U. A revised role for the hospital cardiac arrest
team. Resuscitation 1998;38:145—9.
S189
23. Smith GB, Osgood VM, Crane S. ALERT—–a multiprofessional
training course in the care of the acutely ill adult patient.
Resuscitation 2002;52:281—6.
24. Smith GB, Poplett N. Impact of attending a 1-day multi-
professional course (ALERT) on the knowledge of acute care
in trainee doctors. Resuscitation 2004;61:117—22.
25. Featherstone P, Smith GB, Linnell M, Easton S, Osgood VM.
Impact of a one-day inter-professional course (ALERTTM )
on attitudes and confidence in managing critically ill adult
patients. Resuscitation 2005;65:329—36.
26. Nolan J. Advanced life support training. Resuscitation
2001;50:9—11.
27. Buss PW, McCabe M, Evans RJ, Davies A, Jenkins H. A survey
of basic resuscitation knowledge among resident paediatri-
cians. Arch Dis Child 1993;68:75—8.
28. Carapiet D, Fraser J, Wade A, Buss PW, Bingham R. Changes
in paediatric resuscitation knowledge among doctors. Arch
Dis Child 2001;84:412—4.