of Turks are in favor of joining the European Union. -Turkeys unique geo-strategic position, plus the strength of NATOs second- largest army would greatly add to European security. -Turkey is already a vibrant democracy. The prospect of EU membership has spurred reforms that strengthen pluralistic politics and improve human rights. The passage to membership will provide the incentive to complete those reforms. -young and dynamic population. -Global player -would be NATOs 2 nd biggest army -To Turkeys credit, it would be difficult to make such a declaration with the current foreign relations it has with Armenia. -Germany does not want Turkey to become part of the EU due to a fear of mass emigration, which could destabilize the economy and greatly raise the unemployment rate. -Turkeys historic and cultural roots lay in Central Asia and the Middle East. It missed the shared experiences that bind Europeans together, from the cultural legacy of Renaissance and Enlightenment, to the horrors of the Second World War II which galvanized the drive for united Europe. -Freedom of religion -Unstable Government -GDP per capital will be below EU28
Immigration is a problem in the EU because The European Union member states have been faced by the problem of immigration with the influx of citizens from former soviet states and their former colonies and have long tried to curb this influx. The member states of the European union have tried to halt this problem by agreeing on joint policies that they are trying to implement. They have tried to put pressure on other member and non-member states of Europe that have been a source of the problem. There is also the trade in immigrants that is carried out organised gangs who profit from this. Young women and children are sometimes forced to work as prostitutes for these gangs. They are ferried across Europe in the back of lorries, ships or anything that they can be put in and stay undetected until they reach their destination. The funds derived from this criminal activities have been said to be a source of terrorist funding. Illegal immigration also has a negative effect on the economy, the state treasury receives less money because there are so many people out there working and not paying taxes. Illegal immigration is also a strain on the government as some immigrants claim benefits that cost the tax payers hundreds of millions of pounds a year. Illegal immigrants who come into the country in search of better living standards are also more willing to work for less. This tends to cause tension and resentment from the indigenous residents. A few right wing groups have seized on this discontent and campaigned on it at election times. There has always been the question of how to control the flow of immigration into Europe. Different governments and experts have all come up with different solutions. The Italian Interior Minister proposed a six month legal permit that it hoped will stem the flow of illegal immigration and at the same time reduce the cost on the part of the Italian government. The Minister reckons that with his proposal many immigrants will flow into the country through the government system rather than through profiteering gang. The British government suggested having immigration and asylum centers outside the European Union were claims will be processed in one of those enrooted countries. If the plan is generally accepted it is hoped that it will help redistribute more fairly the number of immigrants in Europe. Britain has long been the preferred choice of immigrants coming into the European Union. This plan has proved to be very controversial as other less attractive countries do not want the extra cost it will incur if asylum seekers and immigrants were distributed more fairly across Europe.