Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
) (
) (
) (
)
(
) (
)
Deviation: | |
Deviation
Trail 1 0.37 mL
Trail 2 0.33 mL
Trail 3 0.03 mL
Average Deviation 0.24 mL
RMD:
According to the data from table 1 average volume used for titration was 20.13 mL. The
average deviation of 0.24 mL and RMD shows that the results were very imprecise. Whenever a
titration is done the deviations should be very small, the large deviation indicates a big percent
error in the final result. For this part of the experiment it was important to keep the
temperature of the solution above 70C, it is very difficult to keep the temperature up and
cautiously titrate the solution, therefore an error could have occurred when the solution fell
below the required temperature.
Table 2: Volume of KMnO
4
used
Buret Reading Rough Trail 1 Trail 2 Trail 3
Final (mL) 19.70 44.50 22.50 46.15
Initial (mL) 0.00 19.70 0.00 22.50
Volume dispensed (mL) 19.70 24.80 22.50 23.65
Average Volume (mL) 23.65
4
Chemical Equations
MnO
4
-
(aq)
+8H
+
(aq)
+5Fe
2+
(aq)
Mn
2+
(aq)
+4H
2
O
(l)
+5Fe
3+
(aq)
KMnO
4
K
+
+MnO
4
-
Mass of Unknown Fe #6: 5.0004 g
Grams Fe used:
) (
) (
)
(
Grams Fe salt used: (
)
% Fe
2+
in soluble compound: (
)
Deviation
Trail 1 1.17 mL
Trail 2 1.15 mL
Trail 3 0 mL
Average Deviation 0.77 mL
RMD: 33
The huge deviation and RMD indicate the results were all over the place and most likely quite
inaccurate. Not following directions all the way though could have caused the error in the
results. It was very important to get the 5.00 mL of H
3
PO
4
as accurate as possible when adding
it to the flasks with the unknown solution. Not enough care was put into adding the H
3
PO
4
solution to the unknown causing the titration to be spread out from trail to trail.
Conclusion
The first part of the experiment was used to determine the molarity of the KMnO
4
solution, which was calculated to be 0.01780 M. The second part of the experiment was used to
determine the main purpose of the experiment, which is to determine the % Fe in unknown
sample. The resulting data and calculations indicated that the % Fe in the unknown sample #6
was 11.76%.
Through this experiment one can conclude that there are way to determine the amount
of certain substance in unknown sample is present.
This method had its drawbacks and advantages. One of the bigger draw backs was that
it was very difficult keeping the substance above 70 degrees Celsius in air conditioned room.
However, titration is a very good system for this type of experiment because it is easier to get
the mixture to the accuracy of a single drop.
5
References
1. Deal, S. T., & Pope, S. R. (1996). Improved end point detection in the redox titration of
vitamin C in green peppers. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(6), 547. Retrieved
from http://search.proquest.com/docview/211991212?accountid=3784
2. "History." Titration. Creative Commons Attribution, n.d. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.
<http://chemteacher.chemeddl.org/services/chemteacher/index.php?option=co
m_content&view=article&id=56>.
3. Chemistry 124 Experiments, Hamilton, P. Ed. CCBC Printing: Baltimore MD. 2014
pg. 54-57