Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The Texas Attorney General considers itself as independent of laws from the counties
that it”governs." For example, the United States Constitution, the State Bar Rules of Professional
Conduct, Daubert, Stowers and other well settled law is not considered when the Texas Attorney
General decides upon policy and in violation of the “Mission Statement” engaging in Texas
Deceptive Practice Act [DPTA] violations that govern the Law Enforcement Division, attorneys
David Talbot Jr. , Karen Matlock and as demonstrated when Karen Matlock is still employed by
the Texas Attorney General and the Texas Attorney General, Greg Abbott lied to Plaintiff
Davis, Dr. Shirley Pigott M.D. and Beverly F. Thompson on Oct 6, 2008 about reaching a
resolution which included the necessary reporting of Professional Conduct Violations of Karen
D. Matlock in a Section 1983 case 4:03-CV-02395, for Matlock’s role in the murder of a
federal witness, Melinda “Lindy Harrison” Honerkamp, the racketeering of Texas Private
Investigators (participating in a illegal dissemination i.e. the “CAPIAS” and in a federal court
trial ) and the Texas Medical Board (dismissing well settled law i.e. Daubert ) denying due
process ( to Dr. Shirley Pigott M.D. ) and where attorney Karen D. Matlock but not limited to
attorney Mari Robinson, attorney Natalia Luna Ashley ( Seguin, Texas) continues to abuse her
( their) office and public money, wasting, abusing public money for ‘legal services’ in violation
Rule 8.04 states Misconduct (a) A lawyer shall not: ... (3) Engage in conduct involving
dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; The State Bar can sanction and, suspend
his license or even DISBAR.
Plaintiff Davis deliberately hindered unable to communicate about Texas Ethics
Commission December 14, 2009 ref ID 27741 for an ’opinion’ from the Chief Open Records
Division using wire services, internet services, when Texas Ethics Commission, attorneys
Warren Tom Harrison, Natalia Luna, General Counsel, and Ian M. Steusloff, Assistant General
Counsel, used the United States Mail to violate the law and make misrepresentations.
Requested are the cost, legal services connected to the Keith Schmidt “Federal Court” case.
Also requested due to Attorney Spriggs intended testimony about intimidation, retaliation,
attorney Karen Matlock riding around in Texas DPS [black and white] cruisers, threatening
opposing counsel Spriggs, Matlock tampering with a GRAND JURY to ‘adjust’ the “Federal
Court” case i.e lawsuit against a former Texas Department of Public Safety trooper who shot an
18-year-old man in 2005 got under way Monday in federal district court. The trial centered
around Trooper Mike Vennell's shooting of Emilio Sanchez Jr., as the teenager ran from a
crashed stolen vehicle after a high-speed car chase from Dumas to Amarillo on Nov. 15, 2005.
Sanchez's family members filed the suit in March 2006. A Potter County grand jury twice
decided not to indict Vennell, who resigned from DPS in June. Vennell is now a student, said
Karen Matlock from the Texas Attorney General's office, which is representing him in the case.
Requested are the cost, legal services connected to the legal defense of Trooper Vennel and the
letter from Texas DPS of the lawsuit filed by the attorney Spriggs.
In addition the Executive Directors and Commissioners of various "Commissions" i.e. Texas
Ethics Commission i.e. attorney Warren Tom Harrison, Texas Medical Board i.e. attorney
Mari Robinson are not elected, but are appointed in an unclear process and the Texas
Attorney General represents the Texas Governor Rick Perry. The lawsuit filed by Plaintiff
Carol Ann Davis February 18, 2003 is legitimate and based on other letters for the Texas
Attorney General requesting the Texas Attorney General to act consistent with duty, written
to Andy Taylor by Plaintiff Davis concerning the events connected to the Texas Board of
Private Investigator i.e. Cliff Grumbles and Jay Kimbrough with Travis County Prosecution
Team 480-735 and the illegal dissemination of identifiers, tampering with governmental
data bases not pursuant to the Texas Government Code, subchapter “F” as demonstrated in
the “CAPIAS” document filed in “Federal Court” case number 4:03-CV-02395 and the
sufficient cause for Texas State Auditor John Keel to launch a criminal investigation, and the
last communication of attorney Karen Matlock was that Plaintiff Davis allegations were
“false and defaming” and Karen Matlock and the Texas Attorney General often make false
statements in the usual course of business and in “Federal Court” absent any basis in fact or
law, impervious to the truth and the Rules of Professional Conduct in the face of
overwhelming evidence that she and her office played a major role in the concealment of
citizens, especially those engaged in federally protected activities including the murders of
Daniel Joost, Alan Mabry, Donna Ringoringo. Attorney Karen D. Jones Matlock (from
Seguin, Texas) continues to economically benefit by lying, yet the Office of the Texas
Attorney General conspired with the O’Quinn Law Firm, attorneys Larry Mayo and Leona
Filis (whose name is not on the “Federal Court docket sheet”) making false claims about a
Section 1983 lawsuit that was recited on PACER as Carol Ann Davis v City of Jersey
Village et al and the Texas Attorney General spent public money defending a private party
i.e. Lonnie Ray Davis. That said, requested are the cost for ‘legal services’ rendered by
the Office of the Texas Attorney General, attorney Karen Matlock and all the other
associates, colleagues, legal assistants, private investigators, including the detailed
telephone toll charges, cellular telephone bills and cellular telephone calls discussed in
“Federal Court”, by attorney Matlock and also but not limited to her conversations with
opposing counsel James “Jim” Supkis, postage , and copying cost that were paid from public
money connected to 4:03-CV-02395 from August 25, 2004 ( at 49 ) un opposed motion, set
up “behind the scenes” by attorney Barbara Worth Palmer, and plaintiff attorneys Mike
Decker (also not the docket sheet) and Tom Sanders. Finally requested is all
correspondence, telephone calls, notes that recite any and all demands for settlement
submitted by Plaintiff in connection with Section 1983 case that was misrepresented by
attorney Karen Matlock et al that Plaintiff Davis sued the Texas DPS ( when Plaintiff did
not) and requested are the current AG, plans to do to continuing his stalwart leadership
as the next attorney general of Texas, who after taking “a very serious look” at the 2010
AG’s race decided to assign Karen Matlock to Civil Action Number 2:09-CV-00296. So
what is Abbott going to do? Requested are documents and the documents connected to the
press spokesman for Abbott’s campaign who has not returned telephone calls seeking
comment to the misrepresentations of Greg Abbott about attorney Karen Matlock. That said,
requested are documents in cases involving claims for malpractice or other alleged
wrongful conduct in the performance of professional services, either under professional risk
insurance policies or outside of such policies by the Texas Attorney General . Claims
include similar claims filed by other actually innocent citizens and the defense of such
claims involves all aspects of litigation, including initial case handling and consultation,
discovery and case development, summary judgment, and other practices designed to reduce
or eliminate the claims asserted against the State of Texas and its ‘professionals’ clients in
arbitrations, mediation, and other forms of alternative dispute resolution, and if necessary,
trial or other contested case evidentiary hearings including Prison Legal News, Civil Action
Number 2:09-CV-00296 filed in TXSD Corpus Christi. Requested are the legal services
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas P. Sartwelle
James C. Harrington