Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Long Title
Elevators are beautiful things. They take the widely accepted concepts of both personal
space and avoiding strangers, and throw them out the window. Space creates settings for
appropriate behavior, enable/disables privacy and facilitates/inhibits interaction from others
(Little, Biggs, Coventry,2005, p 256). Elevators take away this space, forcing interactions with
others. Common elevator behavior is to take out a phone or avoid eye contact with whoever is
there with you. The small spaces of elevators can also cause feelings of claustrophobia for some
people. In a more ideal society, people in an elevator will have meaningful conversations with
each other. The goal of this experiment is to prove that starting a conversation in an elevator, or
any tight place, is nothing to be intimidated by.
Participants
The subjects of the experiment are random people that step into an elevator. The
experiments are conducted in a building with many floors, making it highly likely to see many
different people, even after multiple trips up and down on the elevator. For the best results, the
experiment should be conducted in a diverse setting.
Measurements
A point system has been designed for this experiment. Participants are recorded as a
number on the data table. Participants initially have zero points. They are first asked hey, hows
it going? If the participant smiled, but said nothing (clearly avoiding conversation), or simply
had no type of response, they were given one point. If the participant gave a one-word response,
such as good, or fine, they were given two points. If the participant gives a conversationstriking response (good, how about you? or bad, and precedes to tell why things arent going
well), they are given 3 points, the maximum amount for the experiment.
Procedure
In the environment where the experiment was conducted, the predominant race of the
population was white, and the smallest minority consisted of Hispanic people. There were 50
participants in the study. 27 of which were white, 14 black, 6 Asian, and 3 Hispanic. The results
show that in an elevator, black participants indulge in conversation more than any other race.
86% of black participants spoke, 83% of Asian participants spoke, 70% of white participants
spoke, and 33% of Hispanic participants spoke.
Based on our point system, the composite scores of each race are as follows:
White: 56 points (86% response)
Black: 32 points (94% response)
Asian: 13 points (92% response)
Hispanic: 4 points (50% response)
Trial No.
No. of People
Race
White
Gender
Points Earned
3
White
Black
Asian
Black
Black
White
White
White
White
Hispanic
White
White
Black
Asian
10
White
White
Black
11
12
Hispanic
13
White
White
Asian
Asian
14
15
White
16
Black
Black
White
Hispanic
White
17
18
Black
19
White
White
Black
Black
Asian
20
21
22
23
White
White
White
White
Black
White
White
24
White
25
White
White
White
Black
Black
26
White
27
Asian
White
Discussion
The data gathered in this experiment show that in an elevator, black people are more likely to
indulge in friendly conversation than any other race. hispanic people appear to be less likely to
do so. This doesnt necessarily mean that black people are more sociable than others. Perhaps
black people are less bothered by being confined to a small space. Out of 50 participants, 37
spoke (74%), which is a solid percentage. The small percentage of participants that didnt speak
Some limitations in the experiment should be noted; the given environment may not be the most
ideal for this type of experiment. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte is a PWI
(predominantly white institution), so the minority data will be skewed because there are less
participants. Of all the trials conducted, only 3 Hispanic people entered the elevator, so they are
probably not well represented as a race. But the main thing found in this experiment is that
people will respond if you take the initiative to start a conversation.
References
Nancy K. Baym, Yan Bing Zhang & Mei-Chen Lin. (2004). Social interactions across
media. New Media & Society. 6(3), 299-318.
Kynan Eng, Matti Mintz, and Paul F M J Verschure. (2005). Collective Human Behaivor In
Interactive Spaces. International Conference on Robotics and Automation (112-114)