2The spreading of 3Was a qualified p 4He held all the sh 5Lee voted himse 7He recruited him 8He was killed in a 9His widow claime
The Co. opposed the claim on the ground that Lee
The Court held that :
"Lee and his Co. were distinct legal persons which
a servant of the Co."
"In his capacity of MD he could on behalf of the Co
as Pilot and the Co. was that of the servant and m
"Lee was a separate person from the Co. he forme
o. was formed for Aerial Top Dressing by Lee.
spreading of fertilisers such as superphosphate over farmland a qualified pilot held all the shares except one share. voted himself as the MD ecruited himself by inserting a Clasue in AOA as the Chief Pilo was killed in a air crash while working for the Co. widow claimed the compensation for the death of her husband
nd that Lee was not a worker as the same person could
rsons which had entered into contractual relationships
alf of the Co., give himself orders in his other capacity
rvant and master."
o. he formed, and his widow was held entitled to get t
over farmland with the use of aircraft.
the Chief Pilot at a fixed Salary.
of her husband in the course of employment.
person could not be a employer and employee.
elationships under which he became, the Chief Pilot,
her capacity of Pilot, and the relationship between him