Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Purposeofthestudy:
Nichols,J.,&Soe,K.(2013).AnAnalysisofPreservice
TeacherResponsestoParticipationinaLiteracyProgram
forNewImmigrantChildren.MulticulturalPerspectives,
15(4),220226.
Thepurposeofthisstudywastocreateaprogramto
improvetheliteracyskills(reading,writing,andEnglish
language)ofimmigrantstudents,whileexploringthe
impactoftheprogramonthepreserviceteachereducation
studentswhoparticipatedastutorsfortheproject.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation.
Thisqualitativeexaminationofpreserviceteachers
reflectionsontheseexperienceswerecollectedoverthe
20102011academicyear.Thestudyusedinformation
collectedfrom90writtenjournalreflections.
Forthecurrentstudy,methodsofbothcritical
ethnographyandnarrativeinquirywereimplemented.
Forthisproject,preserviceteachersattitudesand
reactionsofworkingwithlimitedEnglishspeaking
immigrantchildrenwereanalyzed.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
Fourthemesemergedbasedonthepreserviceteachers
journalbreakdowns:
(1)frustrationsinworkingwithELLstudents,
(2)pleasantexperiencesthatconfirmedtheirdecisionto
entertheteachingprofession,
(3)recognizingthattheyarecurrentlynotwellprepared
toworkwithdiverseand/orlowincomepopulations,and
(4)surprisesthatlanguagebarrierswerenotas
debilitatingaswhattheyhadanticipated.(p.222)
tccl.rit.albany.edu
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
DomostuniversityeducationprogramshaveESLorELL
training,classes,oropportunitiestolearnstrategiesfor
teachingchildrenwhospeaklimitedornoEnglish?
Werethereanystrategiesthepreserviceteachersfoundto
beverysuccessfulthroughoutthestudy?
Theprojectwasoverallbeneficialfornewteachersto
haveopportunitiestoworktogetherandprepare
themselvesforstudentstheywillalmostcertainlyhavein
theirclassroomduringtheircareer.
Implicationsforchangeproject
Ifoundthistobeareallyfascinatingarticleandstudy.Ithinktheconceptisreallygreat,IknowmyfirstyearIfelt
manysimilarfeelingstothepreserviceteachersinthestudy.Iwasworkinginaschoolwithalmostanentirepopulation
ofimmigrantfamiliesandESLchildren.IknowthatIwasfortunatetohavesomereallywonderfulmentorsinmyfirst
yearthathelpedandsupportedmewithstrategiesandmanagementideas.Italsomakesmecuriousaboutteachersatthe
Purposeofthestudy:
Aragon,L.,Carroll,D.,Coval,L.,Fulmer,C.,Sobel,D.,
&GarrisonWade,D.(2011).SchoolCultureFor
StudentsWithSignificantSupportNeeds:Belongingis
NotEnough.InternationalJournalofSpecialEducation,
26(2),120127.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Theschoolsselectedwerebasedonrecommendations
fromexpertsofhighschoolswithexceptionalprograms
forstudentswithsignificantsupportneeds.Thesite
selectedwasinthewesternregionoftheUS.
Tenkeypersonnelagreedtobeapartofthestudyand
theirinterviewsweretaperecordedandtranscribed.
Highlydetailedfieldnoteswererecordedduringweekly
observations.Thesenotesincludedphysicalcues,
interactions,conversations,wholistened,silencesand
nonverbalbehavioursect.
Artifactswerealsocollectedandcategorizedforanalysis
(ex.Missionstatements,agenda,samplesofstudentwork
ect).
Informationwasthensortedusingananalyticframework
andbrokendowntodevelopconclusionsand
extrapolationofdata.
http://www.funnyordie.com/topic/school-spirit
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Iamwonderingwhatexpertswerebasingtheirdecisionto
recommendthisasatopqualifyingschoolfortheirspecial
educationtechniques.Whatwastheirlistofrequirements?
Didtheyinterviewthestudentswithspecialneeds?Iwould
havelikedtoheartheperspectivethestudentsgaveabout
theiracademicinclusionandtheirsocialinclusion.Didthey
feelreallyconnectedtotheirschool?Therewasalotof
effortputintobuildingthatschoolcommunity,butIwould
becurioustoknowifthesestudentsfeltthatsenseof
communityorfeltisolatedbecauseacademicallytheywere
soexcluded.
Purposeofthestudy:
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation.
383childrenagesseventoten,fromfourdifferent
schoolswereassignedtooneofthreesocialgroups.
(1)normofinclusionandfriendlinesstowardothers
(2)normofexclusionandunfriendlinesstowardothers,
(3)normofexclusionplusrelationalaggressiontoward
others
Thestudentswereinformedthattheschoolhadanorm
ofinclusion,orweregivennoinformationaboutaschool
norm.
Participantswerethengivenrelevantinformationtothe
grouptheywerein,listenedtoarecordingfroma
memberoftheirgroup,sawphotosandunderwentan
interview.
Participantsthenrespondedtoquestionsthatassessed
theirattitudestowardtheingroupandtheoutgroup.
Specificlanguagewasusedbytheevaluatortoreinforce
thegroupmentalitythatthestudentwasapartof.
Theevaluatorsusedarankingsystemtobreakdownthe
data.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
-Thestudentswerepreparedtoconformtotheirgroups
norms,buttheylikedtheiringrouplessiftheingroup
normsupportedexclusionarybehaviortowardoutgroup
members,especiallyamongtheolderparticipants.
Theschoolnormsdidinstigateanincreaseinthe
positivityoftheparticipantsattitudestowardoutgroup
members.Thisshowsthattheschoolnormsorclassroom
normsdirectlyaffectthewayourstudentsinteractwith
oneanother.
Thesefindingsareconsistentwiththeresultsofearlier
studiesthatreportedthatdespitetheiringroups
endorsementofoutgroupexclusionandrejection,the
negativityofchildrensintergroupattitudes,andthe
likelihoodofchildrenengaginginbullyingand
aggression,tendedtodecreaseastheyincreasedinage.
Whetherornotparticularchildren,orgroupsofchildren,
displayprejudiceismoredependentupontheirunique
socialsituationratherthantheirparticularageorspecific
cognitiveabilities.
Implicationsforchangeproject
Thepurposeofthisstudywastoexaminetheeffectsof
socialgroupnorms,andschoolnorms,on7and10year
oldchildrensintergroupattitudes.
http://www.kidpower.org/library/article/shunning/
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Wherethereanydifferencesinrelationtogirlsvsboysin
termsofinclusiveorexclusivebehaviours?
Theinterviewswereadministeredbyadultsinaprivate
room.Iwonderifresultswouldhavebeendifferentifithad
beenstudentsorteenagersgivingthetest.Kidstypically
wanttopleaseadultsortellthemwhattheywanttohear.
Whowasgivingthetests,andifitwasayoungperson,
wouldthechildrenfeelliketheycouldbemorehonest?
Purposeofthestudy:
Thepresentreviewlooksbeyondthisdebatetofocuson
specificpedagogicalstrategiesforteachingEnglishliteracy
toESLimmigrantstudents.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation
Theauthorscreatedacriteriatocapturestudieswith
experimentaldesignsforinvestigatingbestpracticefor
teachingimmigrantstudents.Theircriteriaislistedon
page634.
Theyidentified5,185articlesandscreenedthenumber
downto20articlesthatmettheircriteria.Therewere26
studiesusedwith3150participants.
Theyfocusedonreadingandwriting
TheythenusedComprehensiveMetaAnalysissoftware
tohelpremoveanoutlyingeffectsizes
analyseswereconductedonthefollowingfactors:type
ofinterventionandoutcome;countryandtypeof
communityinwhichstudieswereconducted;sample
characteristics;implementationfeatures;and
methodologicalfeatures.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
www.jantoo.com
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Theresearchersnarroweddownthearticlestheywantedto
usetotwenty.Intheirfindings,someareaswereconsidered
inconclusiveduetolackofinformation.Whydidtheynot
includemorearticlesandstudies,orbroadentheircriteria?
Theresultswerenotedtobeusedwithcautionasthe
meaneffectsizesmaynotberepresentativeofthe
population.
-effectivestrategiesincludedcooperativereading,
Inoticedalargeportionofthearticlestheyusedinvolved
systematicphonicsinstruction,structuredwritingand
Spanishspeakingstudies.IslearningEnglishmore
diarywriting.
ESLstudentsfromlowSESbackgroundsbenefitedfrom challengingforstudentsfromcertaincountrieswherethere
arelesscorrelationsinwords(forexample,Frenchand
literacyinterventionsthesameasstudentsfromahigher
Englishhavemanywordsthataresimilar).
SESbackground.
theauthorssuggestmoreresearchtobeconductedandto
continuetoexaminefacetsthatengageinclusiveESL
literacyinterventions.
Implicationsforchangeproject
ThisarticlemademereflecthowMayassituationisquiteunique.Thearticlespoketohowwatchingtelevisionwith
captionsoncanbeagreattoolforlearningthelanguageasyouarehearingtheworkandseeingthewordandviewing
thecontextofthemeaningvisually.ForMaya,mosttelevisiononTVwouldbeinDanish,andImsureshewatches
programsthatareinArabicaswell.SheislearningEnglish,butalsolearningDanishwhilespeakingArabicathomeit
isaninterestingsituation.Weareincorporatingsomestrategiesthatarelistedaseffectiveincludingcooperative
reading,phonicsinstruction,anddiary(journal)writing.ForMaya,journalwritinghasbeenthatstrategythatshehas
connectedmostwith.Itisagreattoolforherandsomethingshecanworkindependentlyat,andsomethingwecandoin
amoreguidedwritingmanner.Iwasabitdisappointedthattheresultsfromthisarticlewereabitinconclusive,Ihope
theresearcherscontinuetoworkthroughthistopicandtheresearchisveryvaluableandrelevant!
#5Articlereference:
Purposeofthestudy:
Cirino,P.,LinanThompson,S.,Prater,K.,&Vaughn,S.
(2006).TheResponsetoInterventionofEnglish
LanguageLearnersatRiskforReadingProblems.
JournalofLearningDisabilities,39(5),390398.
Retrievedfromhttps://www.researchgate.net.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Allstudentsingradeonefromelevenschoolswere
screenedinthefalltodetermineiftheywereconsidered
tobeatriskin.
Thescreeningconsistedoftwosubtests(inbothSpanish
andEnglish):(a)theLetterWordIdentificationsubtest
fromWLPBRand(b)thefirstfivewords(consistingof
twotofourletterwords)fromanexperimentalword
readinglistusedtoassessinitialwordreadingability
(p.393).
thestudentswereconsideredtobeatriskiftheydidnot
meetminimumcriteriaoflessthan1SDbelowthemean.
studentsreceivedanextra50minutesadayofliteracy
interventionforsevenmonthsofextrasupport.
Thestudentswerethenassessedagainattheendoffirst
andsecondgradetodeterminehowmanystudentswho
hadpreviouslyrespondedtointerventionkepttheir
responderstatueandhowmanywentbacktobeing
consideredatrisk.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
-The study followed students literacy progress for two
years. It was noted that a significant amount of students
left the school (for example moved) so they were not able
to continue in the study. It is important to note that two of
the three students that were at risk at the end of grade
two, moved to a different district, so following up on
their progress was not an option.
Ifthestudentswerenotrespondingtotheintervention
strategies,thentheywereconsideredforspecial
educationservices.
relativetointerventionstudents,therewereagreater
numberofcontrolstudents,whodidnotmeetRTIcriteria
attheendofgradeone.Thestudysuggeststhatthat
traditionalclassroominstructionaloneisinsufficient.
These findings suggest that ELL students are at risk for
literacy struggles, but when they are provided with
explicit, systematic, and intensive interventions, they can
make substantive gains that distinguish them from control
www.cartoonstock.com
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Whatwerethestrategiestheywereusinginthe
interventionthattheyfoundtobesosuccessful?
Thestudyclaimsthattraditionalclassroominstructionis
notsufficientenoughtomakethenecessarygainstobe
considerednotatrisk.91%ofstudentswhoreceivedthe
interventionmetcriteriaattheendoffirstgrade,compared
toonly41%ofthecontrolstudents.Thismakesmewonder
iftheclassroominstructioniseffective?Perhapsthe
programormethodthatthecontrolgroupisusingneedsto
bealteredormodified?Itmakesmewonderifthe
interventionstrategieswereusedwithintheclassroom
teachings,wouldthatbemorebeneficialandtimeefficient?
Purposeofthestudy:
Thepurposeofthisstudyistoexplorethepsychological
consequencesoneexperienceswhenexcludedinthe
presenceofaninclusiveindividual.
Drawafigurativerepresentation.
ImageobtainedfromGoogleimage.
ThisisfromtheshowTheOffice.(Imnotsureifyou
watchornot,butitisfunnyshow!)
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Werethereanydifferencesinthefeelingsoffemalesversus
males?
Howcouldthisinformationbeappliedtochildren?The
articlestatedthatchildrenasyoungasagefivebegintobe
awareofsocialexclusionandhowitmakesthemfeel.
Wouldtheresultsfromthisstudybethesameasvarious
ages?
Purposeofthestudy:
Wyer,Natalie.(2008).CognitiveConsequencesof
PerceivingSocialExclusion.JournalofExperimental
SocialPsychology,44(4),10031012.
Thepurposeofthestudyistounderstandwhatleadssocial
perceiverstotreatsomerelationships,butnotothersas
categoriesorviewthemasjointentities.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation
Threeseparateexperimentswereusedtoinvestigatehow
peopleperceiverelationships.Inalltheexperiments,
participantswereexposedtovariousscenarioswith
variousrelationshipsbeingdepictedandmanipulated.
Anexamplemightbe,twoindividualssharing
informationwitheachother,whilepurposefully
withholdingtheinformationfromthethirdparty;ortwo
individualssharinginformationwithnoexclusionofthe
thirdperson.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
Participantsinthestudyusedinformationinvolving
socialexclusiontoinferrelationshipboundariesbetween
peoples.
Participantsnotedthatwhentwomembersofa
relationshipactivelyincludeanotherpersonintheir
interactions,thatthirdpersonisincludedwithinthe
relationship.
www.cartoonstock.com
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Doyouthinkthattheparticipantspersonalsituationsor
emotionswouldtransferovertotheirjudgmentsofwhether
ornotsomeonewasbeingincluded?Isthereanyaccount
forpersonalbiasintheresults?
Wouldthisresearchberelevanttoapplytovariousage
categories?
Participantsalsonotedthatwhenthethirdpersonis
activelypreventedfromjoiningtherelationship,the
boundaryisstrengthened,withtheexcludedindividual
ontheoppositesideoftheboundary.
Participantsmakeconclusionsaboutarelationshipbased
onhowinclusivetheinteractionsare.
Whentwoindividualsareviewedashavinganinclusive
relationship,theyessentiallybecomeviewedasasingle
entity.Participantsbegantogeneralizethemasaunitand
rememberedmoredetailsaboutthethirdpersonorthe
outsiderofthegroup.
Implicationsforchangeproject
Thisarticleandstudyreallyfocusesonhowweasindividualsperceiverelationships.Researchindicatesthatitisour
humannaturetobesocialandtowantcloserelationships.Itisimportanttobeabletomakeaccurateinferencesabout
relationshipsandpeoplesowecanunderstandourroleandiftherelationshipispermeableforustojoinorbeapartof.
Forexample,ifwearenoticingtwopeoplehavinganintimate,privateconversation,weshouldbeabletorecognizethey
needspaceandthattheymostlikelydonotwanttosharetheirconversationwithothersatthattime.Thisissomething
weareworkingwithMayatorecognizeandunderstand.Sheneedstolearnpersonalboundaries,communicatingin
#8Articlereference:
Purposeofthestudy:
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation.
Thesamplecamefrom30separateinaschooldistrictin
BC,Canada.Therewere674totalstudentsinthestudy,
572wereL1and102wereESL.(L1=Englishasfirst
language)
TheESLpopulationofthesamplewasverydiverse,
with33languages.ThemajoritywereCantonese,
Mandarin,Korean,FarsiandSpanishspeakers.
-The students were classified into three groups based on
their performance on the SDRT and WRAT3 assessments.
The article provides rationale based on the testing, but the
groups were called poor comprehenders (PC), poor
readers (PR), and good comprehenders (GC).
The students were given standardized and experimental
measures of reading, comprehension, working memory,
phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and
syntactic awareness by trained graduate students.
-Each child was individually assessed in a quiet room.
The reading comprehension tasks were administered in
group settings in classrooms.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
Readingcomprehensionisaskillthatneedstobetaught
directlyandimplementedinthecurriculum.
ThestudyprovedthatthatESLstudentsarecapableof
developingwordreadingandreadingcomprehension
skillsthatareequalorsimilartothoseoftheirL1peers
withsupportandinstruction.
88%ofstudentsinL1and85%ofstudentsintheESL
groupwereclassifiedasGC.
10%oftheL1studentsandabout13%oftheESL
studentswereclassifiedasPC
2%ofbothgroupswereclassifiedasPR
www.andertoons.com
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Theschooldivisionhasadivisionwideliteracyprogram
withsupportfortheirESLlearners.Thereweredifferences
noticedintheliteracyscoresinearlyyears,butbythefifth
gradetheyhadevenedoutsotospeak.Iwouldbecurious
toknowhowmanystudentsconsideredESLinthestudy,
hadbeeninthedivisionforalloftheirschooling.How
manyofthosestudentshadalreadyreceivedextensive
literacysupportthroughouttheirschooling?
Werethestudentsgiventhesametestatthebeginningand
endtodetermineprogress?Werethereanysupportsgiven
whiletakingthetests?(languageclarificationect).
#9Articlereference:
Purposeofthestudy:
Colombo,M.,Jacobs,C.,McMakin,D.,&Shestok,C.
(2013).HopefulnessforTeachersofELLsintheEraof
NCLB.MulticulturalPerspectives,15(2),8187.
Thearticleexplorestheconceptofhopeasanimportant
qualityinteacherpreparationtoteachEnglishLanguage
LearnersintheeraofNCLB.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation.
interviewswith20middleschoolteachersaskingabout
preandinservicepreparationstrategiestheyhavefor
workingwithELLlearners,andhowworkingwithELL
studentsandfamilieshasinfluencedtheirpractice.
usedaconstantcomparisonmethodfordatacodingwith
NVivosoftware.
www.sayuncleinc.com
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
-Teachershavegoodideasandstrategiestohelpmeetthe
needsofESLlearnersandworkhardtodifferentiatetheir
lessonsandassessments.
Theyarehowever,runningintohugedilemmasas
standardizedtestingisonetestforeveryone,writtenin
languagethatisconfusingandchallengingforthese
students.
teachersfeelhelpless,asthesestudentsstrugglethrough
theseassessmentsthatultimatelyreflectnegativelyonthe
teacher.
theauthorsstressimportanceofqualityeducationfor
preserviceteachers,teacherpreparationsupports,
andfindingwaystocreatemeaningful,caring
relationshipswithstudentsandfamiliesofimmigrant
childrenandfamilies.
teachersfeelhopefulwhentheyusestrategiestheyknow
arebeneficialandgiveopportunitiesfortheirstudentsto
experiencesuccessandconfidence.
Implicationsforchangeproject
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
Arethereanyexemptionsforstudentswhohavejust
movedtotheUSfromstandardizedtesting?
Theteacherswerefromschoolswheretheirscoreswere
especiallylowontheESLsubcategory.WhattheSESwas
oftheseschools?
Purposeofthestudy:
Argyrakouli,E.,Didaskalou,E.,&Vlachou,A.(2006).
Preferencesofstudentswithgenerallearningdifficulties
fordifferentservicedeliverymodes.EuropeanJournal
ofSpecialNeedsEducation,21(2),201216.
Thisstudywasdesignedtoextracttheviewsand
preferencesofprimaryeducationstudentswithgeneral
learningdifficulties*involvingdifferentservicedelivery
models.
*Thisisdefinedasdifficultiesduetoenvironmental,
social,culturalandeconomicdisadvantage.
Summarizethemethodinyourownwords.
Drawafigurativerepresentation.
Thesampleconsistedof95Greekstudentingrades26
withacademicorbehavioralchallengesintheir
classrooms.Studentsconsideredimmigrantorstudents
withidentifiedlearningdisabilitieswereNOTincludedin
thestudy.
Interviews,includingsevenquestionsconcerning
studentsviewsonandpreferencesfordifferent
educationalsettings(regularclassroomwithoutadditional
support,resourceroom,inclasssupport),wereemployed
forgatheringdata.
imageobtainedfromGoogleimage.
Listtheoutcomesinpointform,underliningfivekey
words.
Theresultswereorganizedintothreeresponsecategories:
(1) Studentspreferenceforeducationalsetting
(regularwithoutanysupportorresourceroom)
(2) Preferenceforpersonprovidinghelp
(3) Preferenceforpreferredlocationofreceiving
support(inclassorresourceroom)
(1)Themajoritypreferredtheresourceroom(53.7%),
however,thepreferencewasgreatlyinfluencedforall
studentsaboutwheretheyfoundtheyworkedbest.
(2)Majority,64.2%preferredspecialeducationteacher
overtheirclassroomteacher.
(3)Thiswasanalmostevensplit.*SpecialEducation
Teachersdonotpushintoclassroomstosupport,soto
findanswerstothisquestionsthequestionwasaskedasa
hypothetical.Somestudentsreferredtotheirclassroomas
theirnaturallearningplace.Andappearedquite
fascinatedtothinkaboutthespecialeducationteacher
beingthereasahelpertotheclassroomteacher.
Writetwoquestionsyouhaveabouttheresearch.
*Thearticlediscussedthecurrentsituationasbeing
inclusionistonlyinsofarasitinvolveslocational
integration.(203)Theclassroomteachersreceiveno
supportforstudentsmentionedinthestudy,thismakesme
questionifthismakesthesestudentsfeelneglected?
Couldthisrelatetowhythemajorityofthestudentsprefer
theirSpecialeducationteachers?
Howmanyspecialeducationteachersareineachschool?