Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Learning Objectives
Introduction/Do Now
During Lesson
Thursday/Friday
Characterization: Curley, George and
Lennie
AEC writing review
1. Cite strong and thorough textual
evidence to support analysis of what the
text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text. [RL.9-10.1]
3. Analyze how complex characters (e.g.,
those with multiple or conflicting
motivations) develop over the course of a
text, interact with other characters, and
advance the plot or develop the theme.
[RL.9-10.3]
30. Initiate and participate effectively in a
range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with
diverse partners on Grade 9 topics, texts,
and issues, building on others ideas and
expressing their own clearly and
persuasively. [SL.9-10.1]
28. Draw evidence from literary or
informational texts to support analysis,
reflection, and research. [W.9-10.9]
I can characterize multiple characters
based on their actions, thoughts, and
dialogue.
I can use evidence and commentary to
back up my claim in my writing.
Students will complete a Do Now on the
following prompt:
What does it mean to be a good friend?
What characteristics do you look for in a
friend?
Now write about your best friend and why
he/she is such a good friend to you.
o
o
o
Assessment
Homework
Differentiation
Technology
Promethean board
Monday/Tuesday
Major topics in Of Mice and Men:
Characterization, the representation of
women, and vocabulary
Wednesday
Found Poems
Alabama CCRS
Learning Objectives
Introduction/Do Now
During Lesson
Thursday/Friday
Is Killing Ever Justified? (Euthenasia
discussion)
Foreshadowing, and Crooks and the idea
of racism in Of Mice and Men.
1. Cite strong and thorough textual
evidence to support analysis of what the
text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text. [RL.9-10.1]
3. Analyze how complex characters (e.g.,
those with multiple or conflicting
motivations) develop over the course of a
text, interact with other characters, and
advance the plot or develop the theme.
[RL.9-10.3]
5. Analyze how an authors choices
concerning how to structure a text, order
events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and
manipulate time (e.g., pacing, flashbacks)
create such effects as mystery, tension, or
surprise. [RL.9-10.5]
30. Initiate and participate effectively in a
range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with
diverse partners on Grade 9 topics, texts,
and issues, building on others ideas and
expressing their own clearly and
persuasively. [SL.9-10.1]
I can identify moments of foreshadowing
in the story and discuss the authors
purpose in crafting the story.
o
o
o
After Lesson
Assessment
Homework
Differentiation
Technology
Poem
Monday/Tuesday
Post-Mortem of a Protagonist
(Characterization)
American Dream discussion (continued)
1.Cite strong and thorough textual
evidence to support analysis of what the
text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text. [RL.9-10.1]
2. Determine a theme or central idea of a
text and analyze in detail its development
over the course of the text, including how
it emerges and is shaped and refined by
specific details; provide an objective
summary of the text. [RL.9-10.2]
3. Analyze how complex characters (e.g.,
those with multiple or conflicting
motivations) develop over the course of a
text, interact with other characters, and
advance the plot or develop the theme.
[RL.9-10.3]
30. Initiate and participate effectively in a
range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with
diverse partners on Grade 9 topics, texts,
and issues, building on others ideas and
expressing their own clearly and
persuasively. [SL.9-10.1]
Learning Objectives
Introduction/Do Now
Wednesday
Is George guilty of murder?
Is killing ever justified?
Socratic Discussion
30. Initiate and participate effectively in a
range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with
diverse partners on Grade 9 topics, texts,
and issues, building on others ideas and
expressing their own clearly and
persuasively. [SL.9-10.1]
a. Come to discussions prepared, having
read and researched material under
study; explicitly draw on that preparation
by referring to evidence from texts and
other research on the topic or issue to
stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned
exchange of ideas. [SL.9-10.1a]
b. Work with peers to set rules for collegial
discussions and decision-making (e.g.,
informal consensus, taking votes on key
issues, presentation of alternate views),
clear goals and deadlines, and individual
roles as needed. [SL.9-10.1b]
c. Propel conversations by posing and
responding to questions that relate the
current discussion to broader themes or
larger ideas; actively incorporate others
into the discussion; and clarify, verify, or
challenge ideas and conclusions. [SL.910.1c]
d. Respond thoughtfully to diverse
perspectives, summarize points of
agreement and disagreement, and, when
warranted, qualify or justify their own
views and understanding and make new
connections in light of the evidence and
reasoning presented. [SL.9-10.1d]
1. Cite strong and thorough textual
evidence to support analysis of what the
text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text. [RL.9-10.1]
I can support my argument about
Georges guilt/innocence with evidence
from the text and my research.
I can respond thoughtfully and
respectfully to my peers.
Students will read over their trial notes
and add any last minute notes.
Thursday/Friday
Summative Assessment
1. Cite strong and thorough textual
evidence to support analysis of what the
text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text. [RL.9-10.1]
3. Analyze how complex characters (e.g.,
those with multiple or conflicting
motivations) develop over the course of a
text, interact with other characters, and
advance the plot or develop the theme.
[RL.9-10.3]
30. Initiate and participate effectively in a
range of collaborative discussions (oneon-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with
diverse partners on Grade 9 topics, texts,
and issues, building on others ideas and
expressing their own clearly and
persuasively. [SL.9-10.1]
During Lesson
After Lesson
Assessment
Homework
Differentiation
Technology
None.
Test includes:
-Cold passage with questions on
characterization and theme
-Vocabulary word definition knowledge
and use
-Analysis essay on characterization of a
major character in OMaM (not George)
Resources:
Kevin Gallin, former teacher at The New Orleans Charter Science and Math School. (Kevin was my Corps Member Advisor (mentor) through Teach For Americas Delta
Institute teacher preparation program.)
Reflection:
In an ideal world, I would have built in time to compare scenes from either a play or film version of the text to the novel. However, in planning this unit at this point in the
year, there was simply not enough time in the schedule. Since I had already done a medium comparison with scenes from To Kill a Mockingbird and knew that I would be doing so
with Romeo and Juliet, though, I decided it was not necessary for student understanding of the text and our essential questions.
This unit was the first time I used mostly station work to cover major topics in a text. Station work allowed me to cover a wide variety of literary topics in a short
amount of time. Students have worked in groups and did stations on literary devices for The Scarlet Ibis, but not stations for as much analysis as many of these stations
required. I think it was a nice change of pace for the students, and most of them really enjoyed being self-directed. However, in retrospect, I wish I had cut out a few of the
stations or taken more time to cover this text so that we could go more in depth with some stations. Students really enjoyed working in stations and having a more student led
classroom. Though most of the time classes worked in their set groups assigned by me, I gave students the freedom to work alone on some days, which some students really
appreciated. I also realized that some stations just need more time, like the station that analyzed Curleys wife on Day 3. Students need more time to really analyze who she is
and annotate the passage.
Ultimately, however, my students gained decent mastery of my focus standard, which was RL9.3characterization. On the cold passage of the exam (5 questions), the
student average was 71% mastery of RL 9.3. This certainly needs we have areas we need to improve on, but I was confident the students would continue to improve. I also think I
need to add more questions in the future to get a more accurate picture of student mastery.
In addition, I had 36 students make Ds or Fs on the essay portion of the exam (scored out of 100 graded on the pre-AP rubric). The major problems with those students
essays were the following: 1. Lack of sufficient evidence and commentary 2. Didnt really characterize the character (i.e. the student said things like Lennie works on a farm and
then just summarized) 3. Did not finish the essay. I was pleased overall, though, because I could target with the students what to fix for the next time. I also had very few essays
that summarized the story, which was a big change from the previous unit when we studied The Odyssey. On their test for The Odyssey, about half of my students just
summarized the text instead of explaining how the heros journey defined Odysseus. So, the lack of plot summary was a big step forward for my students.