Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Results
March 13
Experiment
March 16
Experiment
Positive
Positive
March 20
Experiment
Positive
Negative
Negative
Negative
Spud (exp)
Big Potatoe(exp)
Dulche(+)
Carl(+)
Dave(-)
4
Weight (g)
3
2
1
0
13-Mar
16-Mar
20-Mar
Date of Observation
Appendix
Negative
Date
March13
March 16
March 20
Experiment
Weight (g)
Spud (-K) Big
Potatoe (K)
5.15
5.65
4.25
5.08
3.04
3.96
Dulche
(+)
Carl (+)
Dave (-)
5.16
4.77
3.90
6.17
5.60
5.05
5.81
6.43
6.52
20
Height(cm)
Big Potatoe(exp)
15
Dulche(+)
10
Carl(+)
Dave(-)
0
42079
42083
Date of
Observation
Date
March 16
March 20
Height (cm)
Spud (-K) Big
Potatoe (K)
23.3
22.3
21.7
23.3
Dave (-)
22.5
23.4
23.1
25.3
16.9
19.6
Discussion
Variables affecting the plant were water, sunlight, worms and fungus and
of course nutrients. Distilled water was used so that there wasnt anything
else within the water like nutrients which could have affected the plants.
The plants were in the same room and were on a shelf, some were further
back than others so they may have had different exposure to sunlight
which would have affected the results. There was a worm that was
spotted on at least one plant, this may have weakened the plant(s) and
produced outcomes that would not have happened otherwise. Similarly a
couple plants had a fungus which like the worm affected the outcomes in
a way that it would not have had the fungus not been present.
We collected data by measuring the plants weight as well as (sometimes)
measuring the plants length. Measuring the weight of the plants showed
to be more effective because there was a larger difference in weight than
there was in length.
An error occurred which significantly impacted the results. The positives
and potassium deprived were in the worst shape. This may be because we
overloaded the plant with too much minerals for the first day. We did this
by only adding the nutrients without adding the water. This overload of
minerals made the positives and the potassium deprived dehydrated. It
did this by breaking the link of water molecules linked together by
cohesion that was sucking the water up the plant. This lead to the plants
becoming dehydrated as seen in the results. The positives and potassium
deprived shrivelled up and lost weight. This is evidence of dehydration.
The negative gained weight, although it did succumb to disease it still
prospered.
To make this experiment more accurate with results several things could
have been done differently. The plants could have been directly under a
lamp (without being on a shelf or anything else that would have blocked
sunlight) giving all the plants equal amounts of sunlight. Another
improvement is that there could have been pesticides used on all the
plants in order for the worms to not effect growth. In addition the plants
could have been given fungicide so the fungus also would not have
affected the plants growth. Finally the plants could be given the correct
amount of nutrients so that they would not have been dehydrated.
Conclusion
Our hypotheses was found to be false with negative excelling and the
positives and potassium deprived dehydrated.
Works Cited
Plant Nutrients. (2015, March 31). Retrieved from ncagr.gov:
http://www.ncagr.gov/cyber/kidswrld/plant/nutrient.htm