Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
In this file, you can ref useful information about annual performance appraisal such as annual
performance appraisalmethods, annual performance appraisal tips, annual performance
appraisalforms, annual performance appraisal phrases If you need more assistant for annual
performance appraisal, please leave your comment at the end of file.
Other useful material for you:
performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases
performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms
performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal
Since you can't get out of doing an annual performance review, do what you can to make them as
useful as possible.
No Surprises
The best way to get value out of a performance review is to make sure it contains
no surprises. You shouldn't put anything in an annual performance review that you
haven't already told the employee. This includes your overall evaluation of their
performance and how that compares to others in the group.
The main reason companies require annual performance reviews is to have a method for
distributing annual raises. If each employee is given a grade, raises can be distributed based on
that grade. As a result, when you do an annual performance review, the only thing the employee
listens to is their grade. They want to know what their raise will be.
Using employee grades to apportion raises is fundamentally flawed. It doesn't effectively tie
raises to what an employee did during the year to help the company achieve its goals. It is just a
mathematical distribution. However, you have to use it if it is the company system. Just make
sure you use it in the way that is most helpful in getting your group to produce at peak levels.
Assuming you have been doing continual performance reviews as things happen, and more
formal reviews every quarter, each of your employees will know how they are doing. Therefore,
assembling their annual performance review is simply a matter of pulling material from their
previous three quarterly reviews and adding the fourth quarter items. Make sure the employee
understands that this is just a quarterly review so they can concentrate on what you are telling
them, rather than worry about their grade.
When complete their fourth quarter review, you have completed the performance review part of
the annual review. You and the employee should have a clear and identical perspective on their
performance and, more importantly, their goals for the coming review period. You should both be
able to select the same appropriate grade from whatever list the company has compiled (A, B, C
1, 2, 3, etc.). If there is a difference of opinion, it's usually from the employee not understanding
how their performance compares to others in the group. So if the employee selects a grade higher
than you select, make sure you clarify why.
==================
1. Essay Method
3. Rating Scale
Rating scales consists of several numerical scales
representing job related performance criterions such as
dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc.
Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total
numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are
derived. Advantages Adaptability, easy to use, low cost,
every type of job can be evaluated, large number of
employees covered, no formal training required.
Disadvantages Raters biases
4. Checklist method
5.Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his
subordinates on overall performance. This consists in
simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method,
the ranking of an employee in a work group is done
against that of another employee. The relative position of
each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It
may also be done by ranking a person on his job
performance against another member of the competitive
group.
Advantages of Ranking Method
Employees are ranked according to their
performance levels.
It is easier to rank the best and the worst
employee.
Limitations of Ranking Method
The whole man is compared with another
whole man in this method. In practice, it is very difficult
to compare individuals possessing various individual
traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an