Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Division:
Rating Period:
___
SEPS (PLANNING & RESEARCH)
Name of Rater: .
Position:
Assistant Sch. Division Superintendent
Date of Review: December, 2015
MFO
Educational
Services
Q
U
A
KRAs
OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR
TASKS
TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
4
3
2
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
3.500 4.499
2.500 3 .499
1.500 2.499
1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
(35%)
PLANNING
FRAME,
Provide technical inputs
SYSTEMS,
and support to the
and PLANS
crafting of the first
draft of the School
Divisions Strategic
and Operational
Plans (6-year DEDP
and SDO annual
work and financial
plans) to facilitate the
crafting of the plan
for the Schools
Division.
Tracking Sources or
MOVs
Expected MOV:
Apr-Aug
3%
Technical inputs
provided; First
draft of DEDP
crafted then
submitted and
approved for
minor revision
First draft of
DEDP completed
but no action
taken
Drafting of DEDP
is still in the initial
phase
Aug-Sep
3%
Expected MOV:
L
I
T
Y
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
MFO
Educational
Services
KRAs
PLANNING
FRAME,
SYSTEMS,
and
PLANS
OBJECTIVES/
MAJOR TASKS
TIMELINE
May-Jun
2015
May-Jul
2015
Apr-May
2015
Production of Action
research outputs by
classroom teachers
based on the three
thematic areas: (1)
Quality of Education;
(2) Access to
Education; and (3)
Governance of
May-Dec
2015
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Weight
per
KRA
10%
3%
3%
5%
3
Satisfactory
2.500 3 .499
2
Unsatisfactory
1.500 2.499
Tracking Sources or
MOVs
5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000
4
Very Satisfactory
3.500 4.499
Final Draft if at
least 80%
completed
Final Draft if at
least 70%
completed
Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of
support to the K
to 12 and SHS
Program in
portfolio
successfully
presented by
SDS to DepEd
Secretary
Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of support
to the K to 12 and
SHS Program
successfully
submitted to the
SDS
Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of
support to the K
to 12 and SHS
Program
successfully
submitted to the
Chief of SDO
Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of support
to the K to 12 and
SHS Program
drafted
Portfolio with
Summary of schools
which returned their
pledge of support to
the K to 12 and SHS
Program is
incomplete and did
not meet the
deadline for
presentation to
DepEd Secretary
Expected MOV:
Processed data
accepted by
SDS and used in
fact-based
decision-making
Processed data
returned by SDS
for minor revision
Processed data
are almost 90%
done
Processed data
are still 80% done
Expected MOV:
Classroom
teachers
successfully
presented action
research entries
during the First
Regional
Research
Congress
Classroom
teachers
successfully
presented t least
two (2) action
research or
research proposal
entries presented
Expected MOV:
ACTUAL
RESULTS
1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
Expected MOV:
Final Draft
of the Division ICT
Integration Plan
Education.
RATING
SCORE
MFO
Educational
Services
E
F
F
KRAs
TIMELINE
Jul-Aug
2015
I
C
I
E
N
BASIC
EDUCATION
INFORMATION
SYSTEM (EBEIS)
MAINTENANCE
AND REPORT
GENERATION
8%
5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000
4
Very Satisfactory
3.500 4.499
3
Satisfactory
2.500 3 .499
2
Unsatisfactory
1.500 2.499
Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools submitted
to the SDO and
endorsed to the
Regional
Implementing Unit
Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools submitted
to the SDO for
review and
endorsement to the
RIU
Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools submitted to
the Chief of SGOD
for review and
approval by the SDS
School Form-7
(SF-7) template
completed and
data were used as
basis for division
plotting of school
heads and
assignment of new
teacher-entrants
School Form-7
(SF-7) template is
at least 90%
completed and
data were used as
basis for division
plotting of school
heads and
assignment of new
teacher-entrants
Tracking
Sources or
MOVs
Apr-Jun;
Jul-Aug
2015
Jul-Dec
2015
5%
10%
ACTUAL
RESULTS
1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools is ready for
printing
(35%)
C
Y
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Weight per
KRA
Expected MOV:
Feasibility
studies
certification
Expected MOV:
Reliable and
accurate resource
allocation for all
schools were made
Descriptive and
analytical report
of SF-7
(Template)
Expected MOV:
Reports on
consolidated
requirements of
schools and
learning
centers/ 2015
NAT Report
RATING
SCORE
MFO
Educational
Services
KRAs
BASIC
EDUCATION
INFORMATION
SYSTEM (EBEIS)
MAINTENANCE
AND REPORT
GENERATION
T
I
M
E
L
I
N
E
S
S
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE
OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR
TASKS
TIMELINE
20%
Conduct Data
Management and
Information
Technology
Workshop for
DepEd and nonDepEd Elementary
and Secondary
schools and ALS
ICT Coordinators
Provide Technical
Assistance on these
key areas:
a. responding to the
identified needs of
both DepEd and NonDepEd schools in
relation to LIS/EBEIS
matters;
b. SMME activities and
other matters on
governance and
operations;
c. preparation of the
Locator Map for City
Division City Personnel
and Staff;
d. simplifying certificate of
appearance form for
SGOD monitoring;
e. writeshop on action
research;
(20%)
June 2015
May-Dec
April
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Weight
per KRA
5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000
4
Very Satisfactory
3.500 4.499
3
Satisfactory
2.500 3 .499
All ICT
Coordinators were
trained on Data
Management and
Information
Technology for the
LIS resulting to at
least 85% of them
have updated their
LIS as scheduled
At least 4 of the 6
key areas of
technical
assistance were
provided to
different clients
Tracking Sources
or
MOVs
2
Unsatisfactory
1.500 2.499
1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
All ICT
Coordinators
were trained on
Data
Management and
Information
Technology for
the LIS resulting
to at least70% of
them have
updated their LIS
as scheduled
At least 3 of the 6
key areas of
technical assistance
were provided to
different clients
assistance were
provided to
different clients
ACTUAL
RESULTS
Expected MOV:
LIS status of
all schools
Expected MOV:
Completed
questionnaire;
monitoring
checklist for
SMME; Locator
Map; certificate of
appearance form;
certificate of
appreciation;; data
on teachers major
and IPs
Jul
Jun-Dec
Jun-Dec
RATING
SCORE
MFO
KRAs
OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR
TASKS
TIMELINE
OTHERS
1. Division
Testing
Coordinator
Weight
per KRA
5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
4
3
2
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
3.500 4.499
2.500 3 .499
1.500 2.499
1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
Tracking Sources
or
MOVs
ACTUAL
RESULTS
10%
Administer national
examinations of BEA
formerly NETRC
June
November
2015
10%
Successfully
administered exams
without major errors
committed
TOTAL
100%
1. TEPT-PST
2. NCAE
3. PEPT
Conformed:
Administered exams
with one error
committed/noted/
observed either by
DTC or field
personnel
Recommending Approval:
Administered
exams with two
errors
committed/noted/
observed either by
DTC or field
personnel
Administered exams
with three errors
committed/noted/
observed either by
DTC or field
personnel
Administered
exams with more
than three errors
committed/noted/
observed either
by DTC or field
personnel
Narrative
report
submitted to BEA
APPROVED:
RATING
SCORE*