109" Congress
2d Session SENATE
REPORT
OF THE
SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
ON
THE USE BY THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY OF
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE
IRAQI NATIONAL CONGRESS
together with
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
September 8, 2006 - Ordered to be printedSos” See Wnited States Sate
aug nara ma een September 8, 2006
The Honorable Ted Stevens
President Pro Tempore
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. President:
On behalf of the Select Committee on Intelligence, we submit the following
unclassified reports, together with additional and minority views, for filing with
the Senate: (1) Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links to
Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments and (2) The Use by
the Intelligence Community of Information Provided by the Iraqi National
Congress.
Senate Resolution 400 of the 94" Congress (1976) charges the Committee
with the duty to oversee and make continuing studies of the intelligence activities
and programs of the United States Government, and to report to the Senate
concerning those activities and programs. Pursuant to its responsibilities under
Senate Resolution 400, the Committee has undertaken an in-depth examination of
the matters described in the reports.
Both reports have been approved by the Committee in both classified and
unclassified form. The classified reports are available to Members for reading at
the Committee. The classified reports will also be provided to appropriately
cleared officials of the Executive branch.
The unclassified versions of the reports, which are hereby transmitted for
printing, are intended to provide the Senate, and through it, the American public, a
substantial factual record upon which to consider the issues covered by the
reports.
it Roberts John D. Rockefeller 1V
Chairman Vice ChairmanREPORT
ON
THE USE BY THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY OF
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE
IRAQI NATIONAL CONGRESS
together with
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
September 8, 2006 - Ordered to be printed
SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE
United States Senate
109" Congress
PAT ROBERTS, KANSAS, CHAIRMAN
JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, WEST VIRGINIA, VICE CHAIRMAN
ORRIN G. HATCH, UTAH CARL LEVIN, MICHIGAN
MIKE DEWINE, OHIO DIANNE FEINSTEIN, CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, MISSOURI RON WYDEN, OREGON
‘TRENT LOTT, MISSISSIPPI EVAN BAYH, INDIANA
OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, MAINE BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, MARYLAND
CHUCK HAGEL, NEBRASKA RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, WISCONSIN
SAXBY CHAMBLISS, GEORGIA
BILL FRIST, TENNESSEE, EX OFFICIO
HARRY REID, NEVADA, EX OFFICIO
JOHN WARNER, VIRGINIA, EX OFFICIOTABLE OF CONTENTS
LINTRODUCTION ............--55 eee eee 3
II. BACKGROUND ON IC RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE INC .......- s
III. INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE INC
A. INC Documents
B. INC-Affiliated Sources .
1. Source One .
a. Suspect Nuclear Fac
d. Posewar Findings
2. Source Two
3. Source Three ...
a. Mistaken Identity .........
b. Intelligence Assessments .
4, Source Four .....-- 06600005
a. Postwar Information on Salman Pak
5. Source Five .
6. The Would-Be Defector..........000e00ee eres
C. INC Reporting During DIA’s Management of the ICP. bees
1. CIA Debrief of INC-walk in (Source Eighteen) ........
IV. ALLEGED INC-LINKED SOURCES .
A, CURVE BALL ........+
B. Source Nineteen ..
es — ——__ —_
Page 1V. CONCLUSIONS ........-+
COMMITTEE ACTION
8
|
ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF CHAIRMAN ROBERTS .. -
B
ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF CHAIRMAN ROBERTS JOINED BY SENATORS HATCH,
DEWINE, LOTT, CHAMBLISS, AND WARNER .....-.. +--+ eee eee aloo
ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF VICE CHAIRMAN JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV,
SENATORS CARL LEVIN, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, RON WYDEN, EVAN BAYH,
BARBARA MIKULSKI, AND RUSS FEINGOLD ....... 0002020202080 158
MINORITY VIEWS OF SENATOR HATCH JOINE
(CHAIRMAN ROBERTS ... . 190
ADDITIONAL VIEWS OF SENATOR DEWINE
saeeseeee 199
MINORITY VIEWS OF SENATORS BOND, LOTT, AND CHAMBLISS . . 203
Page 2— ——___—_ _—_—
I. INTRODUCTION
(U) On February 12, 2004, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
agreed to refine the terms of reference of the Committee’s ongoing inquiry into
prewar intelligence with regard to Iraq. The Committee agreed that five of the
new elements, including “the use by the Intelligence Community of information
provided by the Iraqi National Congress (INC),” would be reviewed in “phase II”
of the Iraq inquiry. The Committee released the first phase of the Iraqi review, the
Report of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on the U.S. Intelligence
Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq, on July 9, 2004.
(U) In reviewing the “use by the Intelligence Community of information
provided by the INC,” Committee staff endeavored to keep the scope of the review
consistent with specific terms of reference to which Committee Members
unanimously agreed on February 12, 2004. Consistent with the overall scope of
the inquiry ~ “prewar intelligence with regard to Iraq” — this report focuses only
on the Intelligence Community’s use of prewar INC information, information
provided to the Intelligence Community prior to the March 19, 2003 start of
Operation Iraqi Freedom. The report describes, in brief, the fact that the
Intelligence Community did continue to use and fund the collection of INC
information for over a year after the start of Operation Iraqi Freedom, but does not
provide details regarding how the Intelligence Community used that information
and does not include a review of the quality or utility of INC information after the
start of Operation Iraqi Freedom.
(U) This report also does not focus on the Intelligence Community's use of
INC information in the early and mid-1990s. The Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), which was the agency with primacy in handling the INC following the
1991 Gulf War, has had a long and tumultuous relationship with the INC, in
particular, with the INC’s executive council Chairman Ahmed Chalabi. In
Page 3SS
reviewing the history of this interaction, the Committee found significant
differences of opinion regarding what led to the termination of the relationship,
with each side blaming the other for its failure. The report describes the history of
that relationship to provide context to the Intelligence Community’s later
interaction with the INC, but does not attempt to resolve lingering questions
regarding what led to the CIA’s and INC’s mutual disaffection.
(U) Finally, the report does not provide a review of the INC’s collection
efforts or methods, the INC’s analysis of its own information, or information the
INC may have provided to parties other than the U.S. Intelligence Community.
The Committee understands that the INC made an effort to widely disseminate its
information and brought its information to the attention of U.S. and foreign
government officials, think tanks, the international media, foreign intelligence
services, and others, all of which are outside the scope of the terms of reference
agreed to by Committee Members. The report describes INC defector referrals to
US. government and former government officials, the media, and foreign
intelligence services, only when those referrals pertain to the Intelligence
Community’s use of the information.
(U) The report describes the general history of the Intelligence
Community’s use of INC information and the genesis of how the handling of INC
information transitioned from the CIA to the Department of State and, eventually,
to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The report focuses on information
provided to the Intelligence Community by the INC, in particular, whether and
how the Intelligence Community used that information, the inclusion of that
information in Intelligence Community analysis, and whether the information
played a role in the Intelligence Community’s judgments about Iraq’s weapons of
mass destruction capabilities and links to terrorism.
rr
Page 4a
(U) For clarity, the report makes a distinction between information provided
to the Intelligence Community by members of the INC and information provided
by sources who were referred to the Intelligence Community by the INC. Because
those sources were not members of the INC, the report refers to them as INC-
affiliated sources.
(U) The Committee notes that the Intelligence Community may have
received information from additional INC-affiliated source information from
foreign intelligence services that has not been identified as INC-related. The CIA
told the Committee “we believe it is likely that some reporting from INC sources
may have been fed to the US Intelligence Community via liaison services.” CIA
said this belief reflected its lack of visibility into liaison sources and anecdotal
information that the INC was bringing sources or allegations about Iraq WMD to
other intelligence services, including key liaison partners.
II. BACKGROUND ON IC RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE INC!
(U) In the Spring of 1991, President George H. W. Bush approved efforts
aimed at influencing those in the Iraqi government and military to undertake
action to change the Iraqi leadership. This authorization included encouraging
individuals or groups, both inside and outside Iraq, who wished to remove Saddam
from power and supporting those efforts in a material fashion. It was not the
objective or intent of the U.S. Government that Saddam Hussein, or members of
his regime, be physically harmed, but this authorization took note that there was a
strong possibility that violence of some degree would occur.
" this section of the report has been redrafted substantially from the classified version to accommodate
classification restrictions.
a
Page 5